Question for Scottie Witlessmongrel

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

To His Magnificent Dumbness, duh-Scottie of San Diego:

Arnii Krooborg has proven himself the worst excuse for a self-described
"christian" in the history of Usenet. Of course, we all know the filthy
Beast is off his rails, as in not all there, looney-tunes, bazonkers, etc.
By contrast, you appear to be sane, albeit a bit slow. I would like to ask
you, as a lifelong and devout Lutheran, why you condone Bratzi's racist
rants.

By way of explaining your responsibility to deliver a rationalization for
your approval of RAO's little Nazi bedbug, I point out that you have adopted
the Krooborg's "debating trade" religion. Therefore we Smart Guys demand
that you conform to the least possible level of integrity in the performance
of the "debating trade". That means that you, like your hideous, misbegotten
idol Arnii Kroofeces, are required to utter frequent denunciations of every
opinion and every post of which you disapprove. Lacking such overt
denunciations, your allegiance to the "debating trade" indicates your
acceptance of such posts.

You've never been shy about tattling on me or Shhhh to Mistress Jenn. Nor
have you been reticent about launching volley after volley of impotent
puff-ball insults at John Atkinson, whose only crime, by the 'evidence'
you've cited, is drawing breath. Since you are not obviously insane, you
bear the obligation to denounce racism and other bigotry, else otherwise
your fealty to those antihuman values be presumed as dominant. Get on the
stick, you filthy mutt!

[Clyde Slick]

On 25 Noi, 20:57, George M. Middius > wrote:
> To His Magnificent Dumbness, duh-Scottie of San Diego:
>
> Arnii Krooborg has proven himself the worst excuse for a self-described
> "christian" in the history of Usenet. Of course, we all know the filthy
> Beast is off his rails, as in not all there, looney-tunes, bazonkers, etc.
> By contrast, you appear to be sane, albeit a bit slow. I would like to ask
> you, as a lifelong and devout Lutheran, why you condone Bratzi's racist
> rants.
>
> By way of explaining your responsibility to deliver a rationalization for
> your approval of RAO's little Nazi bedbug, I point out that you have adopted
> the Krooborg's "debating trade" religion. Therefore we Smart Guys demand
> that you conform to the least possible level of integrity in the performance
> of the "debating trade". That means that you, like your hideous, misbegotten
> idol Arnii Kroofeces, are required to utter frequent denunciations of every
> opinion and every post of which you disapprove. Lacking such overt
> denunciations, your allegiance to the "debating trade" indicates your
> acceptance of such posts.
>
> You've never been shy about tattling on me or Shhhh to Mistress Jenn. Nor
> have you been reticent about launching volley after volley of impotent
> puff-ball insults at John Atkinson, whose only crime, by the 'evidence'
> you've cited, is drawing breath. Since you are not obviously insane, you
> bear the obligation to denounce racism and other bigotry, else otherwise
> your fealty to those antihuman values be presumed as dominant. Get on the
> stick, you filthy mutt!


LOL!
Again, I must call you on your loaded question.
If I didn't, Kroologic would dictate that my silence is to be
construed as condoning
your denial of Scott's civil rights in his having an attorney present
during
your interrogation. Of course, if he cannot afford one,
you will have to provide one for him.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Clyde Slick said:

> > To His Magnificent Dumbness, duh-Scottie of San Diego:
> >
> > Arnii Krooborg has proven himself the worst excuse for a self-described
> > "christian" in the history of Usenet. Of course, we all know the filthy
> > Beast is off his rails, as in not all there, looney-tunes, bazonkers, etc.
> > By contrast, you appear to be sane, albeit a bit slow. I would like to ask
> > you, as a lifelong and devout Lutheran, why you condone Bratzi's racist
> > rants.
> >
> > By way of explaining your responsibility to deliver a rationalization for
> > your approval of RAO's little Nazi bedbug, I point out that you have adopted
> > the Krooborg's "debating trade" religion. Therefore we Smart Guys demand
> > that you conform to the least possible level of integrity in the performance
> > of the "debating trade". That means that you, like your hideous, misbegotten
> > idol Arnii Kroofeces, are required to utter frequent denunciations of every
> > opinion and every post of which you disapprove. Lacking such overt
> > denunciations, your allegiance to the "debating trade" indicates your
> > acceptance of such posts.
> >
> > You've never been shy about tattling on me or Shhhh to Mistress Jenn. Nor
> > have you been reticent about launching volley after volley of impotent
> > puff-ball insults at John Atkinson, whose only crime, by the 'evidence'
> > you've cited, is drawing breath. Since you are not obviously insane, you
> > bear the obligation to denounce racism and other bigotry, else otherwise
> > your fealty to those antihuman values be presumed as dominant. Get on the
> > stick, you filthy mutt!
>
>
> LOL!
> Again, I must call you on your loaded question.

Stop trying to put lipstick on a pig. It's a troll, plain and simple. If you
weren't drunk all the time, you'd recall my unambiguous statements that it's
impossible to have a serious discussion with Witlessmongrel.

> If I didn't, Kroologic

Did you smuggle some of that slivo back into the States?

[Clyde Slick]

On 25 Noi, 21:44, George M. Middius > wrote:
> Clyde Slick said:
>
>
>
>
>
> > > To His Magnificent Dumbness, duh-Scottie of San Diego:
>
> > > Arnii Krooborg has proven himself the worst excuse for a self-described
> > > "christian" in the history of Usenet. Of course, we all know the filthy
> > > Beast is off his rails, as in not all there, looney-tunes, bazonkers, etc.
> > > By contrast, you appear to be sane, albeit a bit slow. I would like to ask
> > > you, as a lifelong and devout Lutheran, why you condone Bratzi's racist
> > > rants.
>
> > > By way of explaining your responsibility to deliver a rationalization for
> > > your approval of RAO's little Nazi bedbug, I point out that you have adopted
> > > the Krooborg's "debating trade" religion. Therefore we Smart Guys demand
> > > that you conform to the least possible level of integrity in the performance
> > > of the "debating trade". That means that you, like your hideous, misbegotten
> > > idol Arnii Kroofeces, are required to utter frequent denunciations of every
> > > opinion and every post of which you disapprove. Lacking such overt
> > > denunciations, your allegiance to the "debating trade" indicates your
> > > acceptance of such posts.
>
> > > You've never been shy about tattling on me or Shhhh to Mistress Jenn. Nor
> > > have you been reticent about launching volley after volley of impotent
> > > puff-ball insults at John Atkinson, whose only crime, by the 'evidence'
> > > you've cited, is drawing breath. Since you are not obviously insane, you
> > > bear the obligation to denounce racism and other bigotry, else otherwise
> > > your fealty to those antihuman values be presumed as dominant. Get on the
> > > stick, you filthy mutt!
>
> > LOL!
> > Again, I must call you on your loaded question.
>
> Stop trying to put lipstick on a pig. It's a troll, plain and simple. If you
> weren't drunk all the time, you'd recall my unambiguous statements that it's
> impossible to have a serious discussion with Witlessmongrel.
>
> > If I didn't, Kroologic
>
> Did you smuggle some of that slivo back into the States?-


do you think my retrolls are any more serious than your trolls?

i willl let you handle the pig
http://www.trutv.com/shows/operation_repo/interview-sonia_pizarro.html


..