This about sums it up:

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

Since George W. Bush became president, the Republican Party has
presided over massive, out-of-control government spending, converted a
federal budget surplus into a half-trillion-dollar deficit, and looked
the other way while Wall Street's greed and stupidity turned the
hallowed free market into scorched earth. Now the party has to watch
as a Republican president orchestrates the biggest government
intervention into the workings of the private sector since the New
Deal.

Can any Republican candidate claim with a straight face to represent
the party of small government? For that matter, can any Republican
candidate plausibly explain what the party is supposed to stand for
these days?

....

When a political party reaches the point of lurching incoherence, the
most effective cure is a good, long spell in the wilderness. Americans
should help Republicans out by sending them home to get their act
together.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/10/socialist_charges_from_bailout.html

Perhaps 2pid or Clyde can tell me what the republicans stand for and
how they are superior to the Dems.

Don't forget to keep it short, Clyde. I'll allow you three sentences.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Shhhh! said:

> Since George W. Bush became president, the Republican Party has
> presided over massive, out-of-control government spending, converted a
> federal budget surplus into a half-trillion-dollar deficit, and looked
> the other way while Wall Street's greed and stupidity turned the
> hallowed free market into scorched earth. Now the party has to watch
> as a Republican president orchestrates the biggest government
> intervention into the workings of the private sector since the New
> Deal.

You can't win 'em all. Hoover said that a lot.

> Can any Republican candidate claim with a straight face to represent
> the party of small government? For that matter, can any Republican
> candidate plausibly explain what the party is supposed to stand for
> these days?

They're still trying to outlaw Gay marriage and prohibit sex ed for teens.
And in some states, they're down with mandatory gun ownership and equal
time for Bible stories alongside science curricula.

But you knew all that. ;-)

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Oct 14, 2:59*pm, George M. Middius >
wrote:

> They're still trying to outlaw Gay marriage and prohibit sex ed for teens..
> And in some states, they're down with mandatory gun ownership and equal
> time for Bible stories alongside science curricula.

OK, so the republicans are the party of bedroom intrusion and
firearms. The reason is that you don't need sex: Mary and a couple of
sharks have proven that.

> But you knew all that. ;-)

Indeed. ;-)

[Trevor Wilson[_2_]]

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> Shhhh! said:
>
>> Since George W. Bush became president, the Republican Party has
>> presided over massive, out-of-control government spending, converted a
>> federal budget surplus into a half-trillion-dollar deficit, and looked
>> the other way while Wall Street's greed and stupidity turned the
>> hallowed free market into scorched earth. Now the party has to watch
>> as a Republican president orchestrates the biggest government
>> intervention into the workings of the private sector since the New
>> Deal.
>
> You can't win 'em all. Hoover said that a lot.
>
>> Can any Republican candidate claim with a straight face to represent
>> the party of small government? For that matter, can any Republican
>> candidate plausibly explain what the party is supposed to stand for
>> these days?
>
> They're still trying to outlaw Gay marriage and prohibit sex ed for teens.
> And in some states, they're down with mandatory gun ownership and equal
> time for Bible stories alongside science curricula.
>
> But you knew all that. ;-)

**Indeed. However, the REAL question that enquiring minds want answered is
this:

Will Arny vote for this bunch of crooks again?


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Trevor Wilson said:

> > They're still trying to outlaw Gay marriage and prohibit sex ed for teens.
> > And in some states, they're down with mandatory gun ownership and equal
> > time for Bible stories alongside science curricula.
> >
> > But you knew all that. ;-)
>
> **Indeed. However, the REAL question that enquiring minds want answered is
> Will Arny vote for this bunch of crooks again?

Not if we can get Turdy convicted of a felony.

[Vinylanach]

On Oct 14, 8:08�pm, George M. Middius >
wrote:
> Trevor Wilson said:
>
> > > They're still trying to outlaw Gay marriage and prohibit sex ed for teens.
> > > And in some states, they're down with mandatory gun ownership and equal
> > > time for Bible stories alongside science curricula.
>
> > > But you knew all that. ;-)
>
> > **Indeed. However, the REAL question that enquiring minds want answered is
> > Will Arny vote for this bunch of crooks again?
>
> Not if we can get Turdy convicted of a felony.

Or maybe we already did.

Boon

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Vinylanach said:

> > > Will Arny vote for this bunch of crooks again?
> >
> > Not if we can get Turdy convicted of a felony.
>
> Or maybe we already did.

I still think Scottie murdered Turdborg. Notice there were only two
snot-posts from Mr. ****'s account the other day? Even Scottie could fake
up two posts.

[Vinylanach]

On Oct 14, 8:43�pm, George M. Middius >
wrote:
> Vinylanach said:
>
> > > > Will Arny vote for this bunch of crooks again?
>
> > > Not if we can get Turdy convicted of a felony.
>
> > Or maybe we already did.
>
> I still think Scottie murdered Turdborg. Notice there were only two
> snot-posts from Mr. ****'s account the other day? Even Scottie could fake
> up two posts.

What's the theory behind the connection? Where's the motive?

Boon

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Oct 14, 11:31*pm, Vinylanach > wrote:
> On Oct 14, 8:43 pm, George M. Middius >
> wrote:
>
> > Vinylanach said:
>
> > > > > Will Arny vote for this bunch of crooks again?
>
> > > > Not if we can get Turdy convicted of a felony.
>
> > > Or maybe we already did.
>
> > I still think Scottie murdered Turdborg. Notice there were only two
> > snot-posts from Mr. ****'s account the other day? Even Scottie could fake
> > up two posts.
>
> What's the theory behind the connection? *Where's the motive?

I already explained that. 2pid left a Palin rally all fired up with
the chants of "Lynch him! Off with his head!" bouncing around in his
'brain'. 2pid then ran into GOIA and mistook him for Obama. Ever the
good little conservative, 2pid did what he had been told to do.

[Arny Krueger]

"Vinylanach" > wrote in message

> On Oct 14, 8:08?pm, George M. Middius
> > wrote:
>> Trevor Wilson said:
>>
>>>> They're still trying to outlaw Gay marriage and
>>>> prohibit sex ed for teens. And in some states, they're
>>>> down with mandatory gun ownership and equal time for
>>>> Bible stories alongside science curricula.
>>
>>>> But you knew all that. ;-)
>>
>>> **Indeed. However, the REAL question that enquiring
>>> minds want answered is Will Arny vote for this bunch of
>>> crooks again?
>>
>> Not if we can get Turdy convicted of a felony.
>
> Or maybe we already did.

You really believe this crap?

LOL!

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

The Krooborg has a sudden change of "heart" about standards of "proof".

> >> Not if we can get Turdy convicted of a felony.
> >
> > Or maybe we already did.
>
> You really believe this [dinner treat]?

Arnii, I'll remind you that you have not posted a single shred of evidence
to prove you are not a felon. We'll need something concrete if you want to
put our well-founded suspicions to rest. A link to the disposition of your
trial(s) would be a good start.

Lacking any concrete evidence, we have little choice but to take your
silence on the issue of your criminality as a confession of guilt. That's
how the "debating trade" works -- according to you, the "master".

[Vinylanach]

On Oct 15, 5:39�am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Vinylanach" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 14, 8:08?pm, George M. Middius
> > > wrote:
> >> Trevor Wilson said:
>
> >>>> They're still trying to outlaw Gay marriage and
> >>>> prohibit sex ed for teens. And in some states, they're
> >>>> down with mandatory gun ownership and equal time for
> >>>> Bible stories alongside science curricula.
>
> >>>> But you knew all that. ;-)
>
> >>> **Indeed. However, the REAL question that enquiring
> >>> minds want answered is Will Arny vote for this bunch of
> >>> crooks again?
>
> >> Not if we can get Turdy convicted of a felony.
>
> > Or maybe we already did.
>
> You really believe this crap?
>
> LOL!-

You sound like a man with a lot to hide.

Boon

[Arny Krueger]

"Vinylanach" > wrote in message

> On Oct 15, 5:39?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>> "Vinylanach" > wrote in message
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Oct 14, 8:08?pm, George M. Middius
>>> > wrote:
>>>> Trevor Wilson said:
>>
>>>>>> They're still trying to outlaw Gay marriage and
>>>>>> prohibit sex ed for teens. And in some states,
>>>>>> they're down with mandatory gun ownership and equal
>>>>>> time for Bible stories alongside science curricula.
>>
>>>>>> But you knew all that. ;-)
>>
>>>>> **Indeed. However, the REAL question that enquiring
>>>>> minds want answered is Will Arny vote for this bunch
>>>>> of crooks again?
>>
>>>> Not if we can get Turdy convicted of a felony.
>>
>>> Or maybe we already did.
>>
>> You really believe this crap?
>>
>> LOL!-
>
> You sound like a man with a lot to hide.

Compared to you Boonie, I'm an open book. Think I'm kidding? Why not post
your true address and phone number on the web like I have.

Nahh, I didn't think so.

[Arny Krueger]

"George M. Middiots" > wrote in
message

> My dear master and Command Mr. Krueger,
> I see that the mental midget who posts as Marc Phillips has exposed his
> ignorance as follows:

>>>> Not if we can get My Master and Commander Mr. Krueger convicted of a
>>>> felony.

>>> Or maybe we already did.

>> You really believe this?

> Arnii, I'll remind you that you have not posted a single
> shred of evidence to prove you are not a felon.

Note the childish logic that the Middiot relies on as usual for him. Adults
know that proving a negative hypothesis like this is very difficult or
impossible. Obviously, the Middiot does not know the basics of logic.

[Vinylanach]

On Oct 15, 1:40�pm, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Vinylanach" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 15, 5:39?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> > wrote:
> >> "Vinylanach" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>> On Oct 14, 8:08?pm, George M. Middius
> >>> > wrote:
> >>>> Trevor Wilson said:
>
> >>>>>> They're still trying to outlaw Gay marriage and
> >>>>>> prohibit sex ed for teens. And in some states,
> >>>>>> they're down with mandatory gun ownership and equal
> >>>>>> time for Bible stories alongside science curricula.
>
> >>>>>> But you knew all that. ;-)
>
> >>>>> **Indeed. However, the REAL question that enquiring
> >>>>> minds want answered is Will Arny vote for this bunch
> >>>>> of crooks again?
>
> >>>> Not if we can get Turdy convicted of a felony.
>
> >>> Or maybe we already did.
>
> >> You really believe this crap?
>
> >> LOL!-
>
> > You sound like a man with a lot to hide.
>
> Compared to you Boonie, I'm an open book. �Think I'm kidding? Why not post
> your true address and phone number on the web like I have.
>
> Nahh, I didn't think so.-

Apparently you can't tell the difference between being an open book
and being a fool. You had someone deliver a box of feces to your
door!

Then again, we all know you probably enjoyed that.

Boon

[Arny Krueger]

"Vinylanach" > wrote in message

> On Oct 15, 1:40?pm, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>> "Vinylanach" > wrote in message
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Oct 15, 5:39?am, "Arny Krueger" >
>>> wrote:
>>>> "Vinylanach" > wrote in message
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> On Oct 14, 8:08?pm, George M. Middius
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>> Trevor Wilson said:
>>
>>>>>>>> They're still trying to outlaw Gay marriage and
>>>>>>>> prohibit sex ed for teens. And in some states,
>>>>>>>> they're down with mandatory gun ownership and equal
>>>>>>>> time for Bible stories alongside science curricula.
>>
>>>>>>>> But you knew all that. ;-)
>>
>>>>>>> **Indeed. However, the REAL question that enquiring
>>>>>>> minds want answered is Will Arny vote for this bunch
>>>>>>> of crooks again?
>>
>>>>>> Not if we can get Turdy convicted of a felony.
>>
>>>>> Or maybe we already did.
>>
>>>> You really believe this crap?
>>
>>>> LOL!-
>>
>>> You sound like a man with a lot to hide.
>>
>> Compared to you Boonie, I'm an open book. ?Think I'm
>> kidding? Why not post your true address and phone number
>> on the web like I have.
>>
>> Nahh, I didn't think so.-
>
> Apparently you can't tell the difference between being an
> open book and being a fool. You had someone deliver a
> box of feces to your door!

As usual Boonie, your comment is wrong in every detail.

Nobody has ever delivered feces here, but if you would like to make a
pick-up, please be my guest!

[Vinylanach]

On Oct 15, 1:44�pm, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "George M. Middiots" > wrote in
> messagenews:8rvbf4psb4n7d4c8jv0s82duhjbuoul7co@4ax .com
>
> > My dear master and Command Mr. Krueger,
> > I see that the mental midget who posts as Marc Phillips has exposed his
> > ignorance as follows:
> >>>> Not if we can get My Master and Commander Mr. Krueger convicted of a
> >>>> felony.
> >>> Or maybe we already did.
> >> You really believe this?
> > Arnii, I'll remind you that you have not posted a single
> > shred of evidence to prove you are not a felon.
>
> Note the childish logic that the Middiot relies on as usual for him. Adults
> know that proving a negative hypothesis like this is very difficult or
> impossible. Obviously, the Middiot does not know the basics of logic.

It's not that you can't prove a negative. It's that you can't prove a
positive by citing the absence of a negative. Obviously, Arny does
not know the basics of logic.

Boon

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

The Krooborg jets skyward on a cloud of Kroopocrisy.

> > Arnii, I'll remind you that you have not posted a single
> > shred of evidence to prove you are not a felon.
>
> Note the childish[sic] logic that [my supreme master] relies[sic] on as usual[sic] for him.

Somebody's terribly konfused. You see, Turdball, it's not my "logic" --
it's yours. You would see that if you hadn't gone apoplectic before
finishing my post. My second paragraph contained the vital point of
reference that identifies exactly whose "logic" is at play here:

> > Lacking any concrete evidence, we have little choice but to take your
> > silence on the issue of your criminality as a confession of guilt. That's
> > how the "debating trade" works -- according to you, the "master".

If you're too insane to follow along, ask Mr. Shhhh to explain it to you.
Word has it he's very patient with needy individuals who ask for help.

[Arny Krueger]

"Vinylanach" > wrote in message

> On Oct 15, 1:44?pm, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>> "George M. Middiots" > wrote in
>> messagenews:8rvbf4psb4n7d4c8jv0s82duhjbuoul7co@4ax .com
>>
>>> My dear master and Command Mr. Krueger,
>>> I see that the mental midget who posts as Marc Phillips
>>> has exposed his ignorance as follows:
>>>>>> Not if we can get My Master and Commander Mr.
>>>>>> Krueger convicted of a felony.
>>>>> Or maybe we already did.
>>>> You really believe this?
>>> Arnii, I'll remind you that you have not posted a single
>>> shred of evidence to prove you are not a felon.
>>
>> Note the childish logic that the Middiot relies on as
>> usual for him. Adults know that proving a negative
>> hypothesis like this is very difficult or impossible.
>> Obviously, the Middiot does not know the basics of
>> logic.
>
> It's not that you can't prove a negative.

That's not what I said, Boonie.

Do try to learn to read in your spare time. Then you can get your GED...

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

That old brown magic has taken hold of you again, Turdy. You've started
arguing with yourself for the umpteenth time.

> >> proving a negative hypothesis like this is very difficult or impossible.

> > It's not that you can't prove a negative.

> That's not what I said, Boonie.

Arnii, please instruct yourself to read your own posts before
contradicting yourself. TIA, you crazy whacko Bush-lover.

[Vinylanach]

On Oct 15, 2:43�pm, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Vinylanach" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 15, 1:44?pm, "Arny Krueger" >
> > wrote:
> >> "George M. Middiots" > wrote in
> >> messagenews:8rvbf4psb4n7d4c8jv0s82duhjbuoul7co@4ax .com
>
> >>> My dear master and Command Mr. Krueger,
> >>> I see that the mental midget who posts as Marc Phillips
> >>> has exposed his ignorance as follows:
> >>>>>> Not if we can get My Master and Commander Mr.
> >>>>>> Krueger convicted of a felony.
> >>>>> Or maybe we already did.
> >>>> You really believe this?
> >>> Arnii, I'll remind you that you have not posted a single
> >>> shred of evidence to prove you are not a felon.
>
> >> Note the childish logic that the Middiot relies on as
> >> usual for him. Adults know that proving a negative
> >> hypothesis like this is very difficult or impossible.
> >> Obviously, the Middiot does not know the basics of
> >> logic.
>
> > It's not that you can't prove a negative.
>
> That's not what I said, Boonie.
>
> Do try to learn to read in your spare time. Then you can get your GED...-

Don't you remember? I got my degree from a second tier state
university, and you got yours from a fourth-tier regional college. If
you had graduated from my school, you might be able to actually take a
shot at proving me wrong. Instead, you snip and hide...LOL!

Boon

[Vinylanach]

On Oct 15, 2:32�pm, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Vinylanach" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 15, 1:40?pm, "Arny Krueger" >
> > wrote:
> >> "Vinylanach" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>> On Oct 15, 5:39?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> "Vinylanach" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>>>> On Oct 14, 8:08?pm, George M. Middius
> >>>>> > wrote:
> >>>>>> Trevor Wilson said:
>
> >>>>>>>> They're still trying to outlaw Gay marriage and
> >>>>>>>> prohibit sex ed for teens. And in some states,
> >>>>>>>> they're down with mandatory gun ownership and equal
> >>>>>>>> time for Bible stories alongside science curricula.
>
> >>>>>>>> But you knew all that. ;-)
>
> >>>>>>> **Indeed. However, the REAL question that enquiring
> >>>>>>> minds want answered is Will Arny vote for this bunch
> >>>>>>> of crooks again?
>
> >>>>>> Not if we can get Turdy convicted of a felony.
>
> >>>>> Or maybe we already did.
>
> >>>> You really believe this crap?
>
> >>>> LOL!-
>
> >>> You sound like a man with a lot to hide.
>
> >> Compared to you Boonie, I'm an open book. ?Think I'm
> >> kidding? Why not post your true address and phone number
> >> on the web like I have.
>
> >> Nahh, I didn't think so.-
>
> > Apparently you can't tell the difference between being an
> > open book and being a fool. �You had someone deliver a
> > box of feces to your door!
>
> As usual Boonie, your comment is wrong in every detail.
>
> Nobody has ever delivered feces here, but if you would like to make a
> pick-up, please be my guest!

OK...so let's get this straight...you are a fool, bit no one ever
delivered feces to your door.

Got it.

Boon

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Vinylanach said to KrazyBorg:

> > Do try to learn to read in your spare time. Then you can get your GED...-
>
> Don't you remember? I got my degree from a second tier state
> university, and you got yours from a fourth-tier regional college. If
> you had graduated from my school, you might be able to actually take a
> shot at proving me wrong.

I respectfully disagree with your blanket statement. In addition to a
proper education, Turdy would also need a lifetime inoculation against
insanity. Otherwise it's Kroologic and "debating trade" crapola until the
'borgs come home to regenerate.

> Instead, you snip and hide...LOL!

Arnii can't respond because his fingers are in his ears and he's chanting
"LALALALALAICANTHEARYOU!"

[Vinylanach]

On Oct 15, 3:03�pm, George M. Middius >
wrote:
> That old brown magic has taken hold of you again, Turdy. You've started
> arguing with yourself for the umpteenth time.
>
> > >> proving a negative hypothesis like this is very difficult or impossible.
> > > It's not that you can't prove a negative.
> > That's not what I said, Boonie.
>
> Arnii, please instruct yourself to read your own posts before
> contradicting yourself. TIA, you crazy whacko Bush-lover.

He's going to focus on the "very difficult" part, I'm sure. In truth,
it's easy to prove a negative. For instance, I can prove that I
didn't commit a crime by providing an alibi. Not hard at all.

Then again, what can you expect from someone who graduated from
Oakland College?

Boon

[Vinylanach]

On Oct 15, 4:16�pm, George M. Middius >
wrote:
> Vinylanach said to KrazyBorg:
>
> > > Do try to learn to read in your spare time. Then you can get your GED....-
>
> > Don't you remember? �I got my degree from a second tier state
> > university, and you got yours from a fourth-tier regional college. If
> > you had graduated from my school, you might be able to actually take a
> > shot at proving me wrong. �
>
> I respectfully disagree with your blanket statement. In addition to a
> proper education, Turdy would also need a lifetime inoculation against
> insanity. Otherwise it's Kroologic and "debating trade" crapola until the
> 'borgs come home to regenerate.
>
> > Instead, you snip and hide...LOL!
>
> Arnii can't respond because his fingers are in his ears and he's chanting
> "LALALALALAICANTHEARYOU!"

By the way, didn't somebody send Arny a box of turds a few years ago?
I seem to remember him accusing the Devil of doing it. I just checked
the google archives, and there's absolutely nothing. I remember it
clearly, since it happened when I first got here.

Has Arny been erasing his posts again, or is Google lying to me?

Boon

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Vinylanach said:

> > Arnii can't respond because his fingers are in his ears and he's chanting
> > "LALALALALAICANTHEARYOU!"
>
> By the way, didn't somebody send Arny a box of turds a few years ago?
> I seem to remember him accusing the Devil of doing it. I just checked
> the google archives, and there's absolutely nothing. I remember it
> clearly, since it happened when I first got here.
>
> Has Arny been erasing his posts again, or is Google lying to me?

The former is certainly possible. The latter would depend on
Kroo-kraziness being contagious.

Another possibility is that Arnii was talking echolalically. The RAO
Normals can't be the only ones who recognize Turdborg's obsession with
worthless sound cards as a manifestation of his insanity. When he made the
claim about a box of turds on his doorstep, Turdy was probably just
repeating something poor Susan said to him.

[Clyde Slick]

On 15 Oct, 16:39, Vinylanach > wrote:
> On Oct 15, 5:39 am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
>
> You sound like a man with a lot to hide.
>
> Boon-

After several years, the ****ster is still ashamed of his brown bushes
and dirt covered lawn.

[Clyde Slick]

On 15 Oct, 16:40, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Vinylanach" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 15, 5:39?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> > wrote:
> >> "Vinylanach" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>> On Oct 14, 8:08?pm, George M. Middius
> >>> > wrote:
> >>>> Trevor Wilson said:
>
> >>>>>> They're still trying to outlaw Gay marriage and
> >>>>>> prohibit sex ed for teens. And in some states,
> >>>>>> they're down with mandatory gun ownership and equal
> >>>>>> time for Bible stories alongside science curricula.
>
> >>>>>> But you knew all that. ;-)
>
> >>>>> **Indeed. However, the REAL question that enquiring
> >>>>> minds want answered is Will Arny vote for this bunch
> >>>>> of crooks again?
>
> >>>> Not if we can get Turdy convicted of a felony.
>
> >>> Or maybe we already did.
>
> >> You really believe this crap?
>
> >> LOL!-
>
> > You sound like a man with a lot to hide.
>
> Compared to you Boonie, I'm an open book. *

probably this one

Psychosis and near Psychosis: Ego Function, Symbol Structure,
Treatment, by Eric R. Marcus

Norman Doidge


This book is full of brilliant observations, distinctions, and
clarifications about how to better treat two difficult mental
conditions with psychoanalytic methods: the psychoses, and what the
author calls the near psychoses—a range of subtle disturbances that
include, among other symptomatology, borderline phenomena and
pseudodelusions. The author also has important observations about
patients with “different” wiring, including those with learning
disabilities and Attention Deficit Disorder. It is not an easy book,
but rather one to be studied; for the most part, the difficulties it
presents lie in the fact that it is one of the most probing books on
psychosis ever written by anyone in any field, and one of the most
important books in psychoanalysis in the last fifty years—a true
classic.

http://www.pep-web.org/document.php?id=paq.076.1375a

[Clyde Slick]

On 15 Oct, 16:44, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "George M. Middiots" > wrote in
> messagenews:8rvbf4psb4n7d4c8jv0s82duhjbuoul7co@4ax .com
>
> > My dear master and Command Mr. Krueger,
> > I see that the mental midget who posts as Marc Phillips has exposed his
> > ignorance as follows:
> >>>> Not if we can get My Master and Commander Mr. Krueger convicted of a
> >>>> felony.
> >>> Or maybe we already did.
> >> You really believe this?
> > Arnii, I'll remind you that you have not posted a single
> > shred of evidence to prove you are not a felon.
>
> Note the childish logic that the Middiot relies on as usual for him. Adults
> know that proving a negative hypothesis like this is very difficult or
> impossible. Obviously, the Middiot does not know the basics of logic.

Bull****, you can go to the MSP and get a copy of your criminal
record.
If you are not a felon, it will so indicate that.

[Clyde Slick]

On 15 Oct, 17:32, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Vinylanach" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 15, 1:40?pm, "Arny Krueger" >
> > wrote:
> >> "Vinylanach" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>> On Oct 15, 5:39?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> "Vinylanach" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>>>> On Oct 14, 8:08?pm, George M. Middius
> >>>>> > wrote:
> >>>>>> Trevor Wilson said:
>
> >>>>>>>> They're still trying to outlaw Gay marriage and
> >>>>>>>> prohibit sex ed for teens. And in some states,
> >>>>>>>> they're down with mandatory gun ownership and equal
> >>>>>>>> time for Bible stories alongside science curricula.
>
> >>>>>>>> But you knew all that. ;-)
>
> >>>>>>> **Indeed. However, the REAL question that enquiring
> >>>>>>> minds want answered is Will Arny vote for this bunch
> >>>>>>> of crooks again?
>
> >>>>>> Not if we can get Turdy convicted of a felony.
>
> >>>>> Or maybe we already did.
>
> >>>> You really believe this crap?
>
> >>>> LOL!-
>
> >>> You sound like a man with a lot to hide.
>
> >> Compared to you Boonie, I'm an open book. ?Think I'm
> >> kidding? Why not post your true address and phone number
> >> on the web like I have.
>
> >> Nahh, I didn't think so.-
>
> > Apparently you can't tell the difference between being an
> > open book and being a fool. *You had someone deliver a
> > box of feces to your door!
>
> As usual Boonie, your comment is wrong in every detail.
>
> Nobody has ever delivered feces here, but if you would like to make a
> pick-up, please be my guest!-

He is having a tough time
"dumping" his surplus on eBay.

[Clyde Slick]

On 15 Oct, 19:27, Vinylanach > wrote:
> On Oct 15, 4:16 pm, George M. Middius >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Vinylanach said to KrazyBorg:
>
> > > > Do try to learn to read in your spare time. Then you can get your GED...-
>
> > > Don't you remember? I got my degree from a second tier state
> > > university, and you got yours from a fourth-tier regional college. If
> > > you had graduated from my school, you might be able to actually take a
> > > shot at proving me wrong.
>
> > I respectfully disagree with your blanket statement. In addition to a
> > proper education, Turdy would also need a lifetime inoculation against
> > insanity. Otherwise it's Kroologic and "debating trade" crapola until the
> > 'borgs come home to regenerate.
>
> > > Instead, you snip and hide...LOL!
>
> > Arnii can't respond because his fingers are in his ears and he's chanting
> > "LALALALALAICANTHEARYOU!"
>
> By the way, didn't somebody send Arny a box of turds a few years ago?
> I seem to remember him accusing the Devil of doing it. *I just checked
> the google archives, and there's absolutely nothing. *I remember it
> clearly, since it happened when I first got here.
>
> Has Arny been erasing his posts again, or is Google lying to me?
>
> Boon-

Let's apply some Kroologic here.
It actually happened, because if it didn't
happen, he would have falsely accused me of doing it.

[Vinylanach]

On Oct 15, 9:11*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> On 15 Oct, 16:40, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Vinylanach" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> > > On Oct 15, 5:39?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> > > wrote:
> > >> "Vinylanach" > wrote in message
>
> >
>
> > >>> On Oct 14, 8:08?pm, George M. Middius
> > >>> > wrote:
> > >>>> Trevor Wilson said:
>
> > >>>>>> They're still trying to outlaw Gay marriage and
> > >>>>>> prohibit sex ed for teens. And in some states,
> > >>>>>> they're down with mandatory gun ownership and equal
> > >>>>>> time for Bible stories alongside science curricula.
>
> > >>>>>> But you knew all that. ;-)
>
> > >>>>> **Indeed. However, the REAL question that enquiring
> > >>>>> minds want answered is Will Arny vote for this bunch
> > >>>>> of crooks again?
>
> > >>>> Not if we can get Turdy convicted of a felony.
>
> > >>> Or maybe we already did.
>
> > >> You really believe this crap?
>
> > >> LOL!-
>
> > > You sound like a man with a lot to hide.
>
> > Compared to you Boonie, I'm an open book. *
>
> probably this one
>
> Psychosis and near Psychosis: Ego Function, Symbol Structure,
> Treatment, by Eric R. Marcus
>
> Norman Doidge
>
> This book is full of brilliant observations, distinctions, and
> clarifications about how to better treat two difficult mental
> conditions with psychoanalytic methods: the psychoses, and what the
> author calls the near psychoses—a range of subtle disturbances that
> include, among other symptomatology, borderline phenomena and
> pseudodelusions. The author also has important observations about
> patients with “different” wiring, including those with learning
> disabilities and Attention Deficit Disorder. It is not an easy book,
> but rather one to be studied; for the most part, the difficulties it
> presents lie in the fact that it is one of the most probing books on
> psychosis ever written by anyone in any field, and one of the most
> important books in psychoanalysis in the last fifty years—a true
> classic.
>
> http://www.pep-web.org/document.php?id=paq.076.1375a-

LOL.

Sometimes when I pick up my copy of the DSM-IV, I think I'm reading
Arny's biography.

Boon

[Clyde Slick]

On 19 Oct, 02:43, Soundhaspriority > wrote:

>
> Is this just a borderline phenomena and pseudodelusion?
>

what is the difference between a "real" delusion and a "pseudo"
delusion?

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Clyde Slick said:

> > Is this just a borderline phenomena and pseudodelusion?

> what is the difference between a "real" delusion and a "pseudo"
> delusion?

Hardly.™ Thats an opinion you get to have.™ If you had, a brain Art
you would-know the difference Art, loT"s.

[Vinylanach]

On Oct 19, 11:35*am, George M. Middius >
wrote:
> Clyde Slick said:
>
> > > Is this just a borderline phenomena and pseudodelusion?
> > what is the difference between a "real" delusion and a "pseudo"
> > delusion?
>
> Hardly.™ *Thats an opinion you get to have.™ *If you had, a brain Art
> you would-know the difference Art, loT"s.

Its nice to see that the Middiot thinks thinks that I left RAO forever
but can't stop talking about me, Middiot. Thanks for admitting that
you can't live without me Middiot.

Boon

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Oct 19, 1:35*pm, George M. Middius >
wrote:
> Clyde Slick said:
>
> > > Is this just a borderline phenomena and pseudodelusion?
> > what is the difference between a "real" delusion and a "pseudo"
> > delusion?
>
> Hardly.™ *Thats an opinion you get to have.™ *If you had, a brain Art
> you would-know the difference Art, loT"s (sic).

You missed a "TM".

[MiNe 109]

In article
>,
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote:

> On Oct 19, 1:35*pm, George M. Middius >
> wrote:
> > Clyde Slick said:
> >
> > > > Is this just a borderline phenomena and pseudodelusion?
> > > what is the difference between a "real" delusion and a "pseudo"
> > > delusion?
> >
> > Hardly.� *Thats an opinion you get to have.� *If you had, a brain Art
> > you would-know the difference Art, loT"s (sic).
>
> You missed a "TM".

Doooh!

Stephen

[Laurence Payne[_2_]]

On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 09:58:57 -0700 (PDT), Clyde Slick
> wrote:

>> Is this just a borderline phenomena and pseudodelusion?
>>
>
>what is the difference between a "real" delusion and a "pseudo"
>delusion?

A real delusion is thinking that "phenomena" is a singular noun. A
pseudodelusion" is that anyone cares if you point it out.

[Arny Krueger]

"Laurence Payne" > wrote in message


> On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 09:58:57 -0700 (PDT), Clyde Slick
> > wrote:
>
>>> Is this just a borderline phenomena and pseudodelusion?

>> what is the difference between a "real" delusion and a
>> "pseudo" delusion?

> A real delusion is thinking that "phenomena" is a
> singular noun.

LOL, and very appropriate for the RAO hypercritics of everything that
anything that anybody but they write.

> A pseudodelusion is that anyone cares if
> you point it out.

Indeed, and that applies to all of the RAO trolls, not just Art.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Oct 20, 5:54*am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> > A pseudodelusion is that anyone cares if
> > you point it out.
>
> Indeed, and that applies to all of the RAO trolls, not just Art.

Hm. It seems that GOIA has often bragged about what a good troll he
is.

What does this say about him? That he feels he's a pseudodelusion?

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Shhhh! said:

> > > A pseudodelusion is that anyone cares if
> > > you point it out.
> >
> > Indeed, and that applies to all of the RAO trolls, not just Art.
>
> Hm. It seems that GOIA has often bragged about what a good troll he
> is.
>
> What does this say about him? That he feels he's a pseudodelusion?

He can pretend to be anything he wants. We know he's 97% pure feces,
however.

[Clyde Slick]

On 14 Oct, 14:40, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:

>
> Don't forget to keep it short, Clyde. I'll allow you three sentences.


LOL!!
You offered me a nine sentence question.

[Clyde Slick]

On 14 Oct, 22:45, "Trevor Wilson" >
wrote:
> "George M. Middius" > wrote in messagenews:hdu9f4ld3ot9ot706q31u0h0ji6q3i52bh@4ax .com...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Shhhh! said:
>
> >> Since George W. Bush became president, the Republican Party has
> >> presided over massive, out-of-control government spending, converted a
> >> federal budget surplus into a half-trillion-dollar deficit, and looked
> >> the other way while Wall Street's greed and stupidity turned the
> >> hallowed free market into scorched earth. Now the party has to watch
> >> as a Republican president orchestrates the biggest government
> >> intervention into the workings of the private sector since the New
> >> Deal.
>
> > You can't win 'em all. Hoover said that a lot.
>
> >> Can any Republican candidate claim with a straight face to represent
> >> the party of small government? For that matter, can any Republican
> >> candidate plausibly explain what the party is supposed to stand for
> >> these days?
>
> > They're still trying to outlaw Gay marriage and prohibit sex ed for teens.
> > And in some states, they're down with mandatory gun ownership and equal
> > time for Bible stories alongside science curricula.
>
> > But you knew all that. ;-)
>
> **Indeed. However, the REAL question that enquiring minds want answered is
> this:
>
> Will Arny vote for this bunch of crooks again?
>

As for me, I'm going to vote for a different set of crooks.
I believe in equal opportunity thievery.

[Clyde Slick]

On 20 Oct, 06:54, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Laurence Payne" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> > On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 09:58:57 -0700 (PDT), Clyde Slick
> > > wrote:
>
> >>> Is this just a borderline phenomena and pseudodelusion?
> >> what is the difference between a "real" delusion and a
> >> "pseudo" delusion?
> > A real delusion is thinking that "phenomena" is a
> > singular noun.
>
> LOL, and very appropriate for the RAO hypercritics of everything that
> anything that anybody but they write.
>

"At least" most of the rest of us write better than you.
Besides, I never criticize George's, Boon's, or Shhh's
explanations for your insanity.




> > A pseudodelusion is that anyone cares if
> > you point it out.
>
> Indeed, and that applies to all of the RAO trolls, not just Art.

[Clyde Slick]

On 20 Oct, 11:46, George M. Middius > wrote:
> Shhhh! said:
>
> > > > A pseudodelusion is that anyone cares if
> > > > you point it out.
>
> > > Indeed, and that applies to all of the RAO trolls, not just Art.
>
> > Hm. It seems that GOIA has often bragged about what a good troll he
> > is.
>
> > What does this say about him? That he feels he's a pseudodelusion?
>
> He can pretend to be anything he wants. We know he's 97% pure feces,
> however.

98, 98, 98 ,98 ,98, 98
I measured it yesterday.

[Clyde Slick]

On 20 Oct, 04:03, Laurence Payne > wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 09:58:57 -0700 (PDT), Clyde Slick
>
> > wrote:
> >> Is this just a borderline phenomena and pseudodelusion?
>
> >what is the difference between a "real" delusion and a "pseudo"
> >delusion?
>
> A real delusion is thinking that "phenomena" is a singular noun. *A
> pseudodelusion" is that anyone cares if you point it out.

the author prefaced it with "a", which is singular ("a borderline
phenomena")
so who knows what he actually meant.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Oct 20, 8:38*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> On 14 Oct, 14:40, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > wrote:
>
> > Don't forget to keep it short, Clyde. I'll allow you three sentences.
>
> LOL!!
> You offered me a nine sentence question.

I don't know what you were reading:

Perhaps 2pid or Clyde can tell me what the republicans stand for and
how they are superior to the Dems.

(Note: that's one sentence.)

Don't forget to keep it short, Clyde. I'll allow you three sentences.

Your three sentences begin now.

[Clyde Slick]

On 20 Oct, 23:06, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Oct 20, 8:38*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > On 14 Oct, 14:40, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > Don't forget to keep it short, Clyde. I'll allow you three sentences.
>
> > LOL!!
> > You offered me a nine sentence question.
>
> I don't know what you were reading:
>
> Perhaps 2pid or Clyde can tell me what the republicans stand for and
> how they are superior to the Dems.
>
> (Note: that's one sentence.)
>
> Don't forget to keep it short, Clyde. I'll allow you three sentences.
>
> Your three sentences begin now.

I don't think either party is superior.
I happen to be a registered Democrat, not that
I am active in any way.
You can give my lefotver sentence to someone else, if you don't
want to count this one.

[Vinylanach]

On Oct 20, 8:06�pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:

> Perhaps 2pid or Clyde can tell me what the republicans stand for and
> how they are superior to the Dems.

I'll take a shot:

The Republicans stand for moolah. They are superior to the Dems
because they can scoop up more moolah and shove it into their pockets
when no one is looking.

Wow...I did it in two sentences!

Boon

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Oct 21, 7:22*am, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> On 20 Oct, 23:06, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> > On Oct 20, 8:38*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > > On 14 Oct, 14:40, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > Don't forget to keep it short, Clyde. I'll allow you three sentences.
>
> > > LOL!!
> > > You offered me a nine sentence question.
>
> > I don't know what you were reading:
>
> > Perhaps 2pid or Clyde can tell me what the republicans stand for and
> > how they are superior to the Dems.
>
> > (Note: that's one sentence.)
>
> > Don't forget to keep it short, Clyde. I'll allow you three sentences.
>
> > Your three sentences begin now.
>
> I don't think either party is superior.
> I happen to be a registered Democrat, not that
> I am active in any way.
> You can give my lefotver sentence to someone else, if you don't
> want to count this one.

Or you can use it to describe what the republicans stand for.

(Hint: "small government" and "fiscal responsibility" are non-
starters.)

[Clyde Slick]

On 21 Oct, 09:55, Vinylanach > wrote:
> On Oct 20, 8:06 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > wrote:
> > Perhaps 2pid or Clyde can tell me what the republicans stand for and
> > how they are superior to the Dems.
>
> I'll take a shot:
>
> The Republicans stand for moolah. *They are superior to the Dems
> because they can scoop up more moolah and shove it into their pockets
> when no one is looking.
>
> Wow...I did it in two sentences!
>
> Boon

LOL!!!!!

"At least" they are more competent, or maybe
its just thatthe ppos Dems have holes in their pockets.

[Clyde Slick]

On 21 Oct, 13:37, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:

> Or you can use it to describe what the republicans stand for.
>
> (Hint: "small government" and "fiscal responsibility" are non-
> starters.)- Ascunde citatul -
>


Definitely with you there.
I lived in DC,area, still there part time.Govt and consultancies keep
growing and growing whether Dem or Rep.