Re: The Gimpity-Gimp Goes Hoppity-Hop Down The Bunny Trail

[Clyde Slick]

On 30 Sep, 23:59, "Sophistic" > wrote:

>
> Lemme guess, Gene Robinson or some Episcopalian lesbo. Did you also ask
> said minister how s/he square their abominative activity and what it says
> about
> it in the Bible, and then watch them spin like a top to come up with a
> plausible
> rationalization?

the Bible? You might as well consult
a Spiderman comic book.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Clyde Slick said:

> I don't collect the Testaments
> plus I got 2 years to go till geezerhood.

But you are a dirty jew. Blobbo is trying to summon Pharaoh back from
the dead so he can launch our millennium's first pogrom.

[Sophistic]

Wonderin' how long it would take the MiddiotBot to change the thread title:

> Clyde Slick said:

>> I don't collect the Testaments
>> plus I got 2 years to go till geezerhood.

> But you are a dirty jew. Blobbo is trying to summon Pharaoh back from
> the dead so he can launch our millennium's first pogrom.

.... and then fire and brimstone and pillars of salt left in its wake.

[Vinylanach]

On Oct 1, 2:39�pm, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> Wonderin' how long it would take the MiddiotBot to change the thread title:
>
> > Clyde Slick said:
> >> I don't collect the Testaments
> >> plus I got 2 years to go till geezerhood.
> > But you are a dirty jew. Blobbo is trying to summon Pharaoh back from
> > the dead so he can launch our millennium's first pogrom.
>
> ... and then fire and brimstone and pillars of salt left in its wake.

RAO ain't what it used to be. We pretty much know each other, and the
place isn't run over by sockpuppets. Blasts from the past tend to get
shown the door pretty quickly. Is it time for you to come clean?

Boon

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Vinylanach said:

> > > But you are a dirty jew. Blobbo is trying to summon Pharaoh back from
> > > the dead so he can launch our millennium's first pogrom.
> >
> > ... and then fire and brimstone and pillars of salt left in its wake.
>
> RAO ain't what it used to be. We pretty much know each other, and the
> place isn't run over by sockpuppets. Blasts from the past tend to get
> shown the door pretty quickly. Is it time for you to come clean?

You don't remember Stynchblob? He's just full of hatred, ya know. He had
his first orgasm in many years when he learned about Missy Palin's
"qualifications" to be the Veep.

[Sophistic]

Boonie wrote:

> RAO ain't what it used to be. We pretty much know each other, and the
> place isn't run over by sockpuppets. Blasts from the past tend to get
> shown the door pretty quickly. Is it time for you to come clean?

Chucked the EarthLink account, fed up with the India call centers.
New ISP meant new nom-de-net.
First choices of Sonorous or Epiphany not available.
Sophistic - with chameleonic connotations - was.
You knew me as GeoSynch, Boonie, and I made no attempt to alter my writing
style.
(And lose the smug attitude, it only makes you appear more pompous than usual.)

[Bill[_16_]]

In article >,
says...
>
>
> Vinylanach said:
>
> > > > But you are a dirty jew. Blobbo is trying to summon Pharaoh back from
> > > > the dead so he can launch our millennium's first pogrom.
> > >
> > > ... and then fire and brimstone and pillars of salt left in its wake.
> >
> > RAO ain't what it used to be. We pretty much know each other, and the
> > place isn't run over by sockpuppets. Blasts from the past tend to get
> > shown the door pretty quickly. Is it time for you to come clean?
>
> You don't remember Stynchblob? He's just full of hatred, ya know. He had
> his first orgasm in many years when he learned about Missy Palin's
> "qualifications" to be the Veep.

He used to post under "Geosynch" -- possibly other nyms, but that's one
I remember.

--
Bill

[Sophistic]

The MidYut's lapdog yapped:

> He used to post under "Geosynch" -- possibly other nyms, but that's one
> I remember.

If you can remember that far back, toady, then you'll also remember
Greg Singh, Paul Wagner, Ed Shain and many others who confided
personal info through private e-mail with that lowlife sleazeball that
goes by the name George M. Middius, who then turned around and
betrayed such confidences when it proved expedient.

Hopefully, you know better than to make that same mistake.

[Clyde Slick]

On 1 Oct, 17:26, George M. Middius > wrote:
> Clyde Slick said:
>
> > I don't collect the Testaments
> > plus I got 2 years to go till geezerhood.
>
> But you are a dirty jew. Blobbo is trying to summon Pharaoh back from
> the dead so he can launch our millennium's first pogrom.

My favorite superhero will make it rain locusts on him.

[Sophistic]

Sacky's screwy:

> My favorite superhero will make it rain locusts on him.

Don't take much to nudge you into Loony Tune-land.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Clyde Slick said:

> > But you are a dirty jew. Blobbo is trying to summon Pharaoh back from
> > the dead so he can launch our millennium's first pogrom.
>
> My favorite superhero will make it rain locusts on him.

I hope you don't mean Spider-Man. Or don't you get "Heroes" in Romania?

[Clyde Slick]

On 1 Oct, 19:36, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> Sacky's screwy:
>
> > My favorite superhero will make it rain locusts on him.
>
> Don't take much to nudge you into Loony Tune-land.

Wrong, I am not a Christian

[Clyde Slick]

On 1 Oct, 20:14, George M. Middius > wrote:
> Clyde Slick said:
>
> > > But you are a dirty jew. Blobbo is trying to summon Pharaoh back from
> > > the dead so he can launch our millennium's first pogrom.
>
> > My favorite superhero will make it rain locusts on him.
>
> I hope you don't mean Spider-Man. Or don't you get "Heroes" in Romania?

his name is Kopel Speiderman, son of Isadore, grandson of Isaac

[Vinylanach]

On Oct 1, 3:38�pm, George M. Middius > wrote:
> Vinylanach said:
>
> > > > But you are a dirty jew. Blobbo is trying to summon Pharaoh back from
> > > > the dead so he can launch our millennium's first pogrom.
>
> > > ... and then fire and brimstone and pillars of salt left in its wake.
>
> > RAO ain't what it used to be. �We pretty much know each other, and the
> > place isn't run over by sockpuppets. Blasts from the past tend to get
> > shown the door pretty quickly. Is it time for you to come clean?
>
> You don't remember Stynchblob? He's just full of hatred, ya know. He had
> his first orgasm in many years when he learned about Missy Palin's
> "qualifications" to be the Veep.

Nope, I remember GeoSynch. As I remember, he lived close to me before
I moved to the Pacific Northwest. He once called me caustic, which I
wore as a badge of honor.

Boon

[Vinylanach]

On Oct 1, 3:40�pm, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> Boonie wrote:
> > RAO ain't what it used to be. �We pretty much know each other, and the
> > place isn't run over by sockpuppets. Blasts from the past tend to get
> > shown the door pretty quickly. Is it time for you to come clean?
>
> Chucked the EarthLink account, fed up with the India call centers.
> New ISP meant new nom-de-net.
> First choices of Sonorous or Epiphany not available.
> Sophistic - with chameleonic connotations - was.
> You knew me as GeoSynch, Boonie, and I made no attempt to alter my writing
> style.
> (And lose the smug attitude, it only makes you appear more pompous than usual.)

That wasn't what I meant, unless it says GeoSynch on your driver's
license. And it's hard not to act smug when you have to deal with
Internet poseurs day in and day out.

Boon

[Sophistic]

Boonie twiddled:

> That wasn't what I meant, unless it says GeoSynch on your driver's
> license.

Of course it doesn't. What is this, like, "Groundhog Day" deja-vu all over
again? Asked and answered ad nauseum in the past.

> And it's hard not to act smug when you have to deal with
> Internet poseurs day in and day out.

And all that smugness lay dormant in between long hiatuses from posting on rao?
Or is the noggin gettin' waterlogged from the Pacific Northwest?

[Vinylanach]

On Oct 1, 10:48�pm, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> Boonie twiddled:
>
> > That wasn't what I meant, unless it says GeoSynch on your driver's
> > license.
>
> Of course it doesn't. What is this, like, "Groundhog Day" deja-vu all over
> again? Asked and answered ad nauseum in the past.

I don't think the answer was satisfactory, which is why the issue
keeps coming up.

>
> > And it's hard not to act smug when you have to deal with
> > Internet poseurs day in and day out.
>
> And all that smugness lay dormant in between long hiatuses from posting on rao?
> Or is the noggin gettin' waterlogged from the Pacific Northwest?

I'll take smug anyday over throwing on a cyber-cape, jumping on a
newsgroup and rehashing old battles by calling everyone childish
names. What is this, like "Groundhog Day" deja-vu all over again?
It's worse than smug...it's being a giant asshole.

Boon

[Sophistic]

Boonie gaped:

> > > That wasn't what I meant, unless it says GeoSynch on your driver's
> > > license.

> > Of course it doesn't. What is this, like, "Groundhog Day" deja-vu all over
> > again? Asked and answered ad nauseum in the past.

> I don't think the answer was satisfactory, which is why the issue
> keeps coming up.

Do you ask the same question of "Sheesh! I'm Blabbering For No Reason" who mocks
and disparages two real-life friends of yours? Feckless and obtuse doesn't even
begin to describe you in this instance.

> > > And it's hard not to act smug when you have to deal with
> > > Internet poseurs day in and day out.

> > And all that smugness lay dormant in between long hiatuses from posting on
> > rao?
> > Or is the noggin gettin' waterlogged from the Pacific Northwest?

> I'll take smug anyday ...
> It's worse than smug...it's being a giant asshole.

Nice self-description there, Boonie. I couldn't agree more.
You are, indeed, a humongous sphincter.

[Vinylanach]

On Oct 2, 2:06�pm, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> Boonie gaped:
>
> > > > That wasn't what I meant, unless it says GeoSynch on your driver's
> > > > license.
> > > Of course it doesn't. What is this, like, "Groundhog Day" deja-vu all over
> > > again? Asked and answered ad nauseum in the past.
> > I don't think the answer was satisfactory, which is why the issue
> > keeps coming up.
>
> Do you ask the same question of "Sheesh! I'm Blabbering For No Reason" who mocks
> and disparages two real-life friends of yours? Feckless and obtuse doesn't even
> begin to describe you in this instance.

Here's another problem...most of us who the others are. Do you need a
program?

>
> > > > And it's hard not to act smug when you have to deal with
> > > > Internet poseurs day in and day out.
> > > And all that smugness lay dormant in between long hiatuses from posting on
> > > rao?
> > > Or is the noggin gettin' waterlogged from the Pacific Northwest?
> > I'll take smug anyday ...
> > It's worse than smug...it's being a giant asshole.
>
> Nice self-description there, Boonie. I couldn't agree more.
> You are, indeed, a humongous sphincter.

Oh, a IKYABWAI! How predictable. How long before you self-destruct
like all the others?

Boon

[Sophistic]

Boonie wrote:

> Here's another problem...most of us who the others are. Do you need a
> program?

> > > I'll take smug anyday ...
> > > It's worse than smug...it's being a giant asshole.

> > Nice self-description there, Boonie. I couldn't agree more.
> > You are, indeed, a humongous sphincter.

> Oh, a IKYABWAI! How predictable. How long before you self-destruct
> like all the others?

"[S]elf-destruct"ing you say? Care to re-read that first sentence of yours?
(Oh, and never mind the "Groundhog Day" IKYABWAI you did.)

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Vinylanach said:

> The problem here, of course, is that you have no idea of what happened
> behind the scenes. Sanders (not Saunders) had more of a problem with
> Art and Scott that with George, something we discussed in depth in
> person. If Jim didn't want me to speak to George, he probably would
> have asked. In fact, I don't remember Jim saying anything that
> negative about George. I think they probably communicated with each
> other behind the scenes as much as George and I ever have.

Actually, we did not. But when a twisted hatemonger like Styncho makes a claim
about who "stabbed" whom, it carries just as much weight as when duh-Scottie
does the same thing. Witless had a habit of claiming I "betrayed" Gregipus.
That was about 10% true. Noxious pests like those Stynchie and Scottie are one
cause of the current state of our federal government: They embrace the tactic
of substituting partial truth for the whole truth, and vote for the candidates
who reinforce their laziness and stupidity.

> Why do Internet geeks always have to speak out of ignorance to try and
> score points?

Did you notice that Blobbo never offers the slightest remorse for his hate
trolls? Like the Krooborg, Kroopologists are completely devoid of humor, but
some of them have plunged considerably deeper than their idol into the
darkness of misanthropy and misogyny.

[Sophistic]

Pudge the Gimp minced:

> Vinylanach said:

>> ... In fact, I don't remember Jim saying anything that
>> negative about George. I think they probably communicated with each
>> other behind the scenes as much as George and I ever have.

> Actually, we did not. But when a twisted hatemonger like Styncho makes a claim
> about who "stabbed" whom, it carries just as much weight as when duh-Scottie
> does the same thing. Witless had a habit of claiming I "betrayed" Gregipus.
> That was about 10% true.

And there you have it, Marc - your animosity towards Arny outweighs your
friendship with Scott and, hence, you willingly ally yourself with a lowlife
sleazeball that goes by the name George M. Middius.

Pudge, a pathological prevaricator such as yourself can no longer distinguish
between truth and lies, so your above percentage probably needs to be multiplied
by a factor of ten to arrive at a reasonable level of realism.

> Noxious pests like those Stynchie and Scottie are one
> cause of the current state of our federal government: They embrace the tactic
> of substituting partial truth for the whole truth, and vote for the candidates
> who reinforce their laziness and stupidity.

What meandering tripe...

>> Why do Internet geeks always have to speak out of ignorance to try and
>> score points?

> Did you notice that Blobbo never offers the slightest remorse for his hate
> trolls?

So, 'lil Georgie, did you ever express regret or remorse for the obscenely
incestual comments you repeatedly made to Greg (and even to this day still do
with the "Gregipus" moniker). The words "hate troll" as uttered by you are way
beyond comical.

> Like the Krooborg, Kroopologists are completely devoid of humor, but
> some of them have plunged considerably deeper than their idol into the
> darkness of misanthropy and misogyny.

What a transparently hollow attempt to fortify your alliance with Marc by
bringing up the dreaded spectre of the Krooborg.

[Vinylanach]

On Oct 2, 2:28�pm, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> Boonie wrote:
> > Here's another problem...most of us who the others are. �Do you need a
> > program?
> > > > I'll take smug anyday ...
> > > > It's worse than smug...it's being a giant asshole.
> > > Nice self-description there, Boonie. I couldn't agree more.
> > > You are, indeed, a humongous sphincter.
> > Oh, a IKYABWAI! �How predictable. �How long before you self-destruct
> > like all the others?
>
> "[S]elf-destruct"ing you say? Care to re-read that first sentence of yours?

Yeah...I forgot a word. I must be self-destructing!!!! OMG!!!!

Man, that's as bad as Arny.

> (Oh, and never mind the "Groundhog Day" IKYABWAI you did.)

That wasn't an IKYABWAI...it was throwing your words back in your
face. You don't know the difference?

Boon

[Vinylanach]

On Oct 2, 3:11�pm, George M. Middius > wrote:
> Vinylanach said:
>
> > The problem here, of course, is that you have no idea of what happened
> > behind the scenes. �Sanders (not Saunders) had more of a problem with
> > Art and Scott that with George, something we discussed in depth in
> > person. �If Jim didn't want me to speak to George, he probably would
> > have asked. �In fact, I don't remember Jim saying anything that
> > negative about George. �I think they probably communicated with each
> > other behind the scenes as much as George and I ever have.
>
> Actually, we did not. But when a twisted hatemonger like Styncho makes a claim
> about who "stabbed" whom, it carries just as much weight as when duh-Scottie
> does the same thing. Witless had a habit of claiming I "betrayed" Gregipus.
> That was about 10% true. Noxious pests like those Stynchie and Scottie are one
> cause of the current state of our federal government: They embrace the tactic
> of substituting partial truth for the whole truth, and vote for the candidates
> who reinforce their laziness and stupidity.
>
> > Why do Internet geeks always have to speak out of ignorance to try and
> > score points?
>
> Did you notice that Blobbo never offers the slightest remorse for his hate
> trolls? Like the Krooborg, Kroopologists are completely devoid of humor, but
> some of them have plunged considerably deeper than their idol into the
> darkness of misanthropy and misogyny.

Well, I did notice that he skirted the whole issue about being wrong
about Jim Sanders...unless he was talking about MLB pitcher Joe
Saunders (go Angels!).

Jim and I often talked about RAO, and we both agreed that it was dumb
to hate people we didn't know and have never met. I don't remember
any issues between you and him that had irked him on a personal
level. I may be wrong, but I certainly never saw an instance where I
had to choose between you or him.

The problem with Scott and Art happened because these were people whom
he knew personally. They had been to his house and had received his
hospitality. That was why the situation was so explosive.
Personally, the rest of the RAO bunch (including Arny) were little
more than diversions from a stressful day for him. Apparently
Sophomoric believes, like Bob, that Usenet IS the real world.

Boon

[Vinylanach]

On Oct 2, 3:58�pm, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> Pudge the Gimp minced:
>
> > Vinylanach said:
> >> ... �In fact, I don't remember Jim saying anything that
> >> negative about George. �I think they probably communicated with each
> >> other behind the scenes as much as George and I ever have.
> > Actually, we did not. But when a twisted hatemonger like Styncho makes a claim
> > about who "stabbed" whom, it carries just as much weight as when duh-Scottie
> > does the same thing. Witless had a habit of claiming I "betrayed" Gregipus.
> > That was about 10% true.
>
> And there you have it, Marc - your animosity towards Arny outweighs your
> friendship with Scott and, hence, you willingly ally yourself with a lowlife
> sleazeball that goes by the name George M. Middius.

Jesus Christ...how old are you? Do you really think any of us say
"Choose between me or George?" As far as I know, I am on friendly
terms with Art, Scott, Jim Sanders and even Greg Singh. Anyone who
would take RAO seriously enough to let it leak into real world
friendships is too immature to be my friend. You obviously take this
place too seriously. You might want to discuss this with Bob and see
how it's working out for him.

>
> Pudge, a pathological prevaricator such as yourself can no longer distinguish
> between truth and lies, so your above percentage probably needs to be multiplied
> by a factor of ten to arrive at a reasonable level of realism.

Are you talking to George or me? You keep jumping back and forth.
Find one narrative and stick with it.

>
> > Noxious pests like those Stynchie and Scottie are one
> > cause of the current state of our federal government: They embrace the tactic
> > of substituting partial truth for the whole truth, and vote for the candidates
> > who reinforce their laziness and stupidity.
>
> What meandering tripe...

What non-responsiveness.

>
> >> Why do Internet geeks always have to speak out of ignorance to try and
> >> score points?
> > Did you notice that Blobbo never offers the slightest remorse for his hate
> > trolls?
>
> So, 'lil Georgie, did you ever express regret or remorse for the obscenely
> incestual comments you repeatedly made to Greg (and even to this day still do
> with the "Gregipus" moniker). The words "hate troll" as uttered by you are way
> beyond comical.
>
> > Like the Krooborg, Kroopologists are completely devoid of humor, but
> > some of them have plunged considerably deeper than their idol into the
> > darkness of misanthropy and misogyny.
>
> What a transparently hollow attempt to fortify your alliance with Marc by
> bringing up the dreaded spectre of the Krooborg.

Yeah, like an old married couple, George and I have to constantly work
at this relationship. ROTFLMAO! I don't remember you being such a
drama queen before.

Boon

[Sophistic]

Boonie wrote:

> > > > > I'll take smug anyday ...
> > > > > It's worse than smug...it's being a giant asshole.

> > > > Nice self-description there, Boonie. I couldn't agree more.
> > > > You are, indeed, a humongous sphincter.

> > > Oh, a IKYABWAI! How predictable. How long before you self-destruct
> > > like all the others?

> > "[S]elf-destruct"ing you say? Care to re-read that first sentence of yours?

> Yeah...I forgot a word. I must be self-destructing!!!! OMG!!!!
> Man, that's as bad as Arny.

Well, you opened that door first, then proceeded to slam your finger with it and
followed with a lame gripe that appears to be a shallow face-saving ploy.

> > (Oh, and never mind the "Groundhog Day" IKYABWAI you did.)

> That wasn't an IKYABWAI...it was throwing your words back in your
> face. You don't know the difference?

I know the petulant rantings of a pompous gasbag, which your discourse is
denigrating into.

[Jenn[_3_]]

In article >,
"Sophistic" > wrote:


> I know the petulant rantings of a pompous gasbag,

You should, obviously.

[Sophistic]

Jenn mooed:

>> I know the petulant rantings of a pompous gasbag,

> You should, obviously.

Bravo, Jenn. Well put. Nothing like a bowl of chili and burrito for lunch.

[Jenn[_3_]]

In article >,
"Sophistic" > wrote:

> Jenn mooed:
>
> >> I know the petulant rantings of a pompous gasbag,
>
> > You should, obviously.
>
> Bravo, Jenn.

That would be "brava".

> Well put. Nothing like a bowl of chili and burrito for lunch.

....resulting in your writings here.

[Sophistic]

Jenn curtsied:

>> >> I know the petulant rantings of a pompous gasbag,

>> > You should, obviously.

>> Bravo, Jenn.

> That would be "brava".

If not bravura.

>> Well put. Nothing like a bowl of chili and burrito for lunch.

> ...resulting in your writings here.

"Jumpin' Jack Flash, it's a gas, gas, gas..."

[BretLudwig]

*>>" Jenn mooed:
>
> >> I know the petulant rantings of a pompous gasbag,
>
> > You should, obviously.
>
> Bravo, Jenn.

That would be "brava"."<<

In a similar gender offense,

>>"USS Intrepid to return to its Manhattan pier

BY BILL BLEYER |
October 1, 2008

The historic aircraft carrier Intrepid returns to its Manhattan pier
tomorrow after a 22-month overhaul, and museum officials have taken no
chances that it might get stuck in the mud as it did at the beginning of
its outbound trip.

Bill White, president of the Intrepid Sea, Air & Space Museum, said the
museum has paid $10 million to dredge more Hudson River mud - more than
90,000 cubic yards - than was done for the first unsuccessful attempt to
move the 900-foot-long ship to a New Jersey dry dock. And for good
measure, the ship's four 16-ton, bronze, 22-foot-diameter propellers have
been permanently removed so they can no longer serve as unwanted anchors.
"I am 100 percent confident she will come back in with no problems," White
said.

The ship reopens for the public Nov. 8 at Pier 86, at 12th Avenue and West
46th Street. After an expenditure of almost $120 million since the carrier
was finally relocated in December 2006, visitors will see new exhibits,
areas of the 29,000-ton ship launched in 1943 that were formerly off
limits during its first 23 years on display and additional historic
aircraft and they have access from a newly built pier topped by a free
park."<<

<<snip>>

As the museum president notes, a ship (whether a merchant or naval
vessel) is correctly referred to in the feminine, i.e,"her", "she".
'Dickocracy' or incompetence? Since the writer of the article is
presumably a J-school grad, it's virtually certain it's the latter.

--
Message posted using http://www.talkaboutaudio.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/
More information at http://www.talkaboutaudio.com/faq.html

[Sophistic]

Boon wrote:

> Yeah, like an old married couple, George and I have to constantly work
> at this relationship.

Marc, you know the following as incontrovertible fact:

1. George wheedles personal info via private e-mail from others and then has
used that against them on rao.

2. George repeatedly slandered Greg Singh as having incestual sex with his
mother.

That you can associate with such a lowlife sleazeball speaks volumes of the type
of person you really are. Why is that, Marc? Does it have anything to do with
you and George's shared animosity towards Arny?

[Vinylanach]

On Oct 2, 5:17�pm, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> Boonie wrote:
> > > > > > I'll take smug anyday ...
> > > > > > It's worse than smug...it's being a giant asshole.
> > > > > Nice self-description there, Boonie. I couldn't agree more.
> > > > > You are, indeed, a humongous sphincter.
> > > > Oh, a IKYABWAI! How predictable. How long before you self-destruct
> > > > like all the others?
> > > "[S]elf-destruct"ing you say? Care to re-read that first sentence of yours?
> > Yeah...I forgot a word. �I must be self-destructing!!!! � OMG!!!!
> > Man, that's as bad as Arny.
>
> Well, you opened that door first, then proceeded to slam your finger with it and
> followed with a lame gripe that appears to be a shallow face-saving ploy.

That doesn't even make sense. Yeah, I need to save face because I
forgot a word. I'll never be able to face myself.

>
> > > (Oh, and never mind the "Groundhog Day" IKYABWAI you did.)
> > That wasn't an IKYABWAI...it was throwing your words back in your
> > face. �You don't know the difference?
>
> I know the petulant rantings of a pompous gasbag, which your discourse is
> denigrating into.

Again, no sense at all, just name-calling. Arny would call that a
meltdown.

Boon

[Vinylanach]

On Oct 2, 5:28�pm, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> Jenn mooed:
>
> >> I know the petulant rantings of a pompous gasbag,
> > You should, obviously.
>
> Bravo, Jenn. Well put. Nothing like a bowl of chili and burrito for lunch..

Are you calling Jenn a cow?

Tell us...just how ****ed up is your life right now? Don't be
afraid...you could always be Arny.

Boon

[Vinylanach]

On Oct 2, 9:52�pm, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> Boon wrote:
> > Yeah, like an old married couple, George and I have to constantly work
> > at this relationship.
>
> Marc, you know the following as incontrovertible fact:
>
> 1. George wheedles personal info via private e-mail from others and then has
> used that against them on rao.

If they're private emails, then how would I know that as an
incontrovertible fact? I've told George private things about my life,
and he hasn't used them against me.

>
> 2. George repeatedly slandered Greg Singh as having incestual sex with his
> mother.

Yes. George and Greg were friends and then had a very public
blowout. That doesn't make either one a sleazeball, just two people
who said things in anger.

>
> That you can associate with such a lowlife sleazeball speaks volumes of the type
> of person you really are.

You just called Jenn a cow, and you're judging others? I choose not
to associate with you...that's the type of person I really am.

Why is that, Marc? Does it have anything to do with
> you and George's shared animosity towards Arny?

You're assuming that George and I are alone in our animosity. That's
a pretty blatant error on your part.

Boon

[Clyde Slick]

On 3 Oct, 00:52, "Sophistic" > wrote:

>
> 2. George repeatedly slandered Greg Singh as having incestual sex with his
> mother.
>


vs non incestual sex with his mother?

[Jenn[_3_]]

In article
>,
Vinylanach > wrote:

> On Oct 2, 5:17?pm, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> > Boonie wrote:
> > > > > > > I'll take smug anyday ...
> > > > > > > It's worse than smug...it's being a giant asshole.
> > > > > > Nice self-description there, Boonie. I couldn't agree more.
> > > > > > You are, indeed, a humongous sphincter.
> > > > > Oh, a IKYABWAI! How predictable. How long before you self-destruct
> > > > > like all the others?
> > > > "[S]elf-destruct"ing you say? Care to re-read that first sentence of
> > > > yours?
> > > Yeah...I forgot a word. ?I must be self-destructing!!!! ? OMG!!!!
> > > Man, that's as bad as Arny.
> >
> > Well, you opened that door first, then proceeded to slam your finger with
> > it and
> > followed with a lame gripe that appears to be a shallow face-saving ploy.
>
> That doesn't even make sense. Yeah, I need to save face because I
> forgot a word. I'll never be able to face myself.
>
> >
> > > > (Oh, and never mind the "Groundhog Day" IKYABWAI you did.)
> > > That wasn't an IKYABWAI...it was throwing your words back in your
> > > face. ?You don't know the difference?
> >
> > I know the petulant rantings of a pompous gasbag, which your discourse is
> > denigrating into.
>
> Again, no sense at all, just name-calling. Arny would call that a
> meltdown.


Or his autobiography.

[Vinylanach]

On Oct 2, 10:49�pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> On 3 Oct, 00:52, "Sophistic" > wrote:
>
>
>
> > 2. George repeatedly slandered Greg Singh as having incestual sex with his
> > mother.
>
> vs non incestual sex with his mother?

And somehow Sophomoric thinks this is worse than Arny posting graphic
descriptions of incestual necrophilia on an audio newsgroup.

Boon

[Sophistic]

Boon wrote:

> > Marc, you know the following as incontrovertible fact:

> > 1. George wheedles personal info via private e-mail from others and then has
> > used that against them on rao.

> If they're private emails, then how would I know that as an
> incontrovertible fact?

Don't feign disingenuousness, Marc. Of all the queen-sized hissy fits Paula
Wagner had thrown, this ranked as one of the more flamboyant ones:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/browse_thread/thread/85c4af0184b27e74/8680c574ac2e0148?lnk=gst&q=George%27s+Lies+1#8680c574ac2e0148

wherein George acknowledged
I didn't ask in confidence, Rev. Fraud. You asked me to treat your
answers in confidence, which I agreed to.

But I chucked that out when it became apparent to me that you're a
loon. A wacko, a nutsy-cuckoo, a fruitcake. What's a promise to a
madman?"

and concluded with
"You're nothing BUT a faggot half-kike, and a stupid ONE at
that. ...You have repeatedly claimed that I use "racist"
terms, but you have yet to provide a single bit of evidence to
support that accusation."

This, mind you, before Boy George had traipsed out of the closet ... calling a
fellow homo a "faggot" ... too funny.

> I've told George private things about my life, and he hasn't used them against
> me.

Ah-hah, now we're getting somewhere. Could it be that the lowlife sleazeball has
wheedled damning information from you and wields it like the sword of Damocles
above your head? You see, Marc, in most all other aspects, you seem to be a
decent, stand-up guy, which makes your standing shoulder-to-shoulder with George
through thick and thin all the more baffling.

> > 2. George repeatedly slandered Greg Singh as having incestual sex with his
> > mother.

> Yes. George and Greg were friends and then had a very public
> blowout. That doesn't make either one a sleazeball, just two people
> who said things in anger.

What other possible word is there to characterize this sort of behavior, Marc?

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/search?group=rec.audio.opinion&q=gregipus+mommy****er

> > That you can associate with such a lowlife sleazeball speaks volumes of the
> > type
> > of person you really are.

> You just called Jenn a cow, and you're judging others? I choose not
> to associate with you...that's the type of person I really am.

Part of a methane gasbag riff metaphor meant in jest that has you grasping at
straws to exploit.

> > Why is that, Marc? Does it have anything to do with
> > you and George's shared animosity towards Arny?

> You're assuming that George and I are alone in our animosity. That's
> a pretty blatant error on your part.

Weak, unpersuavsive, if not downright myopic insight. There are many others who
despise Arny as reprehensible but also rightly conclude George as being not much
better. One can only then assume he has something on you, Marc, and may have
threatened to go public with it.

[Surf]

"Sophistic" > wrote...
> Ah-hah, now we're getting somewhere. Could it be that the
> lowlife sleazeball has wheedled damning information from
> you and wields it like the sword of Damocles above your
> head? You see, Marc, in most all other aspects, you seem
> to be a decent, stand-up guy, which makes your standing
> shoulder-to-shoulder with George through thick and thin
> all the more baffling.

you're a complete idiot, Stink.

> Weak, unpersuavsive, if not downright myopic insight.
> There are many others who despise Arny as reprehensible
> but also rightly conclude George as being not much better.
> One can only then assume he has something on you, Marc,
> and may have threatened to go public with it.

Who doesn't like Arny and George?
George is a nice guy.
So in Marc.
So is Sanders.
I've never met Art, but he seems like an interesting
guy....wrong-minded.
Personally, I think big Scott is an asshole.
I've never met you, but you seem not smart......and young.

[Sophistic]

Surf surfaced:

> you're a complete idiot, Stink.

And you've been brained by a surfboard once too often.

Still peddling real estate, har-har.

[Surf]

"Sophistic" > wrote ...
> Surf surfaced:
>
>> you're a complete idiot, Stink.
>
> And you've been brained by a surfboard once too often.

good one. how old?

> Still peddling real estate, har-har.

Yeah. Million dollar deal today. Do the math. You?

You want my email address? You wanna chat? I didn't think
so.

[Sophistic]

Surf's ridin' a big wave:

>>> you're a complete idiot, Stink.

>> And you've been brained by a surfboard once too often.

> good one. how old?

Probably older than the Beach Boys, like you.

>> Still peddling real estate, har-har.

> Yeah. Million dollar deal today. Do the math. You?

Sure, I'll take your word for it. Why not?

Me? Couldn't be better. House is paid off, no car payments, work from home half
the time remoting in to corporate network. Life is good.

> You want my email address? You wanna chat? I didn't think so.

Well, if you put it that way, then, no, maybe some other time.

[Surf]

"Sophistic" > wrote...

>> good one. how old?
>
> Probably older than the Beach Boys, like you.

I'm not older than the Beach Boys. Take another look at my
website.
>
>>> Still peddling real estate, har-har.
>
>> Yeah. Million dollar deal today. Do the math. You?
>
> Sure, I'll take your word for it. Why not?

Even a blind squirrel gets a nut once in awhile, right?

> Me? Couldn't be better. House is paid off, no car
> payments, work from home half the time remoting in to
> corporate network. Life is good.

Not me. Never satisfied. The home is worth double the
mortgage tho. That good? What kind of car?
>
>> You want my email address? You wanna chat? I didn't think
>> so.
>
> Well, if you put it that way, then, no, maybe some other
> time.

Watch TV? Heroes? Battlestar? Lost? Hi-Def? TV a waste of
time? Fantasy footbal? What floats your boat, man?

[Vinylanach]

On Oct 3, 6:48�pm, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> �Boon wrote:
> > > Marc, you know the following as incontrovertible fact:
> > > 1. George wheedles personal info via private e-mail from others and then has
> > > used that against them on rao.
> > If they're private emails, then how would I know that as an
> > incontrovertible fact?
>
> Don't feign disingenuousness, Marc. Of all the queen-sized hissy fits Paula
> Wagner had thrown, this ranked as one of the more flamboyant ones:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/browse_thread/thread...
>
> wherein George acknowledged
> I didn't ask in confidence, Rev. Fraud. You asked me to treat your
> answers in confidence, which I agreed to.
>
> But I chucked that out when it became apparent to me that you're a
> loon. A wacko, a nutsy-cuckoo, a fruitcake. What's a promise to a
> madman?"
>
> and concluded with
> "You're nothing BUT a faggot half-kike, and a stupid ONE at
> that. ...You have repeatedly claimed that I use "racist"
> terms, but you have yet to provide a single bit of evidence to
> support that accusation."
>
> This, mind you, before Boy George had traipsed out of the closet ... calling a
> fellow homo a "faggot" ... too funny.

And what does this have to do with me? I don't judge people by the
things they say in anger. Why are you so obsessed with it?

>
> > I've told George private things about my life, and he hasn't used them against
> > me.
>
> Ah-hah, now we're getting somewhere. Could it be that the lowlife sleazeball has
> wheedled damning information from you and wields it like the sword of Damocles
> above your head?

No, not at all. Again, you should stick with the facts. That's the
Achilles' Heel of Internet geeks...endless conjecture, no truth.

You see, Marc, in most all other aspects, you seem to be a
> decent, stand-up guy, which makes your standing shoulder-to-shoulder with George
> through thick and thin all the more baffling.

Well, if you paid any attention, you'd see that George and I do not
agree on everything. In fact, he and I disagreed about Bob several
times. What did we do? We discussed it an came to an agreement. I
couldn't imagine doing that with an Internet geek like yourself. In
fact, I've shown you to be wrong several times in the last few days,
and what have you done? You move onto something else without
admitting defeat. On that point alone, George is by far the better
man.

>
> > > 2. George repeatedly slandered Greg Singh as having incestual sex with his
> > > mother.
> > Yes. �George and Greg were friends and then had a very public
> > blowout. �That doesn't make either one a sleazeball, just two people
> > who said things in anger.
>
> What other possible word is there to characterize this sort of behavior, Marc?
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/search?group=rec.aud....

Again, you expect me to be some sort of judge and jury here. Let me
illustrate just how pointless your argument is. Bob Morein and I
recently had a blowup because I questioned his statement that SS amps
from the '80s were just as good if not better than state-of-the-art
designs from today. The argument escalated to the point where Bob
wrote an email to someone he perceived to be my employer complaining
about my behavior here. He then started posting "MARC PHILLIPS IS A
BAD AUDIO REVIEWER" all over Usenet. While his complaints had no
effect on my business (mainly because Bob Morein is a well-known
Internet whacko), it was his intent that I had a problem with. This
****ing lunatic tried to ruin my career. He tried to take food out of
the mouths of my children (one of whom has special needs). I want you
to compare a scumbag like that with some argument Greg and George had
many years ago. Now see how you look like an idiot.

But here's the point...Art, who stood by my side through the whole
incident, told Jenn that she should probably avoid talking to Bob
because he had clearly crossed the line. (A few people, including
myself, have now killfiled Bob.) Jenn replied that she still had
pleasant conversations with Bob, and that she didn't want to go
through and read the threads between Bob and me because she could only
handle so many fights at once. Did I get ****ed at her? Did I call
her myopic? NO. I respected her decision to limit the amount of
negativity in her life. That's what grownups do. They don't keep
score on The Big Board, harboring resentment for years, like you do.

>
> > > That you can associate with such a lowlife sleazeball speaks volumes of the
> > > type
> > > of person you really are.
> > You just called Jenn a cow, and you're judging others? �I choose not
> > to associate with you...that's the type of person I really am.
>
> Part of a methane gasbag riff metaphor meant in jest that has you grasping at
> straws to exploit.

Nope. This is where you look like a real scumbag. You just got
caught being a major hypocrite, and your whole argument just fell
apart. Yet you try to skip away as if nothing happened. You just
called a woman a cow, and that's okay. But my failure to pick sides
in an argument that happened years ago is somehow a fatal flaw.

Do you have any idea how stupid and petty and juvenile you look? Of
course not...you're an Internet geek.

>
> > > Why is that, Marc? Does it have anything to do with
> > > you and George's shared animosity towards Arny?
> > You're assuming that George and I are alone in our animosity. �That's
> > a pretty blatant error on your part.
>
> Weak, unpersuavsive, if not downright myopic insight. There are many others who
> despise Arny as reprehensible but also rightly conclude George as being not much
> better. One can only then assume he has something on you, Marc, and may have
> threatened to go public with it.

You can assume all you want. No one here gives a ****. But I will
let you in on a little secret...one of the vast imporvements around
here lately is the overall distaste for Internet trolls like
yourself. The current mix on RAO is still certainly adversarial, but
at least it's real people with real arguments, as opposed to anonymous
****heads coming in here trying to stir up the pot. These idiots tend
to get plonked very quickly.

If you'd like to remain here and not post in a vacuum, I suggest that
you grow a pair of balls and admit that you don't know what you're
talking about. No one here is interested in ancient history. Most of
us here have agreed to a moratorium on certain subjects. I recommend
that you go into the archives and find out what these subjects are.
If you don't, expect to see a lot of plonking. If you can't admit that
you've lost this argument with me right here and now, I'll be the
first.

Ball's in your court, Internet geek.

Boon

[Sophistic]

Boon wrote:

> > > > Marc, you know the following as incontrovertible fact:
> > > > 1. George wheedles personal info via private e-mail from others and then
> > > > has
> > > > used that against them on rao.

> > > If they're private emails, then how would I know that as an
> > > incontrovertible fact?

> > Don't feign disingenuousness, Marc. Of all the queen-sized hissy fits Paula
> > Wagner had thrown, this ranked as one of the more flamboyant ones:

> > http://groups.google.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/browse_thread/thread...

> > wherein George acknowledged
> > "I didn't ask in confidence, Rev. Fraud. You asked me to treat your
> > answers in confidence, which I agreed to.

> > But I chucked that out when it became apparent to me that you're a
> > loon. A wacko, a nutsy-cuckoo, a fruitcake. What's a promise to a
> > madman?"

> And what does this have to do with me? I don't judge people by the
> things they say in anger. Why are you so obsessed with it?

I just vivisected your lame "If they're private emails, then how would I know
that as an incontrovertible fact?" statement and you affirmed it with your
feeble response.

> > > I've told George private things about my life, and he hasn't used them
> > > against
> > > me.

> > Ah-hah, now we're getting somewhere. Could it be that the lowlife sleazeball
> > has
> > wheedled damning information from you and wields it like the sword of
> > Damocles
> > above your head?

> No, not at all. Again, you should stick with the facts. That's the
> Achilles' Heel of Internet geeks...endless conjecture, no truth.

> > You see, Marc, in most all other aspects, you seem to be a
> > decent, stand-up guy, which makes your standing shoulder-to-shoulder with
> > George
> > through thick and thin all the more baffling.

> Well, if you paid any attention, you'd see that George and I do not
> agree on everything. In fact, he and I disagreed about Bob several
> times. What did we do? We discussed it an came to an agreement. I
> couldn't imagine doing that with an Internet geek like yourself. In
> fact, I've shown you to be wrong several times in the last few days,
> and what have you done? You move onto something else without
> admitting defeat. On that point alone, George is by far the better
> man.

You haven't "shown" any such thing, other than delusions of grandeur.

> > > > 2. George repeatedly slandered Greg Singh as having incestual sex with
> > > > his
> > > > mother.

> > > Yes. George and Greg were friends and then had a very public
> > > blowout. That doesn't make either one a sleazeball, just two people
> > > who said things in anger.

> > What other possible word is there to characterize this sort of behavior,
> > Marc?

> > http://groups.google.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/search?group=rec.aud...

> Again, you expect me to be some sort of judge and jury here. Let me
> illustrate just how pointless your argument is. Bob Morein and I
> recently had a blowup because I questioned his statement that SS amps
> from the '80s were just as good if not better than state-of-the-art
> designs from today. The argument escalated to the point where Bob
> wrote an email to someone he perceived to be my employer complaining
> about my behavior here. He then started posting "MARC PHILLIPS IS A
> BAD AUDIO REVIEWER" all over Usenet. While his complaints had no
> effect on my business (mainly because Bob Morein is a well-known
> Internet whacko), it was his intent that I had a problem with. This
> ****ing lunatic tried to ruin my career. He tried to take food out of
> the mouths of my children (one of whom has special needs). I want you
> to compare a scumbag like that with some argument Greg and George had
> many years ago. Now see how you look like an idiot.

You're always carping about me using a nom-de-Net and here you are almost the
victim of the perils of using your real name coupled with a "caustic" posting
personality that you wear as a badge of honor. Do you realize how idiotic that
makes you look?

> But here's the point...Art, who stood by my side through the whole
> incident, told Jenn that she should probably avoid talking to Bob
> because he had clearly crossed the line. (A few people, including
> myself, have now killfiled Bob.) Jenn replied that she still had
> pleasant conversations with Bob, and that she didn't want to go
> through and read the threads between Bob and me because she could only
> handle so many fights at once. Did I get ****ed at her? Did I call
> her myopic? NO. I respected her decision to limit the amount of
> negativity in her life. That's what grownups do. They don't keep
> score on The Big Board, harboring resentment for years, like you do.

Live and learn, Boonie. You know Bob's scorched-earth battles with McLardo have
left him completely unhinged.

> > > > That you can associate with such a lowlife sleazeball speaks volumes of
> > > > the
> > > > type
> > >> of person you really are.

> > > You just called Jenn a cow, and you're judging others? ?I choose not
> > > to associate with you...that's the type of person I really am.

> > Part of a methane gasbag riff metaphor meant in jest that has you grasping
> > at
> > straws to exploit.

> Nope. This is where you look like a real scumbag. You just got
> caught being a major hypocrite, and your whole argument just fell
> apart. Yet you try to skip away as if nothing happened. You just
> called a woman a cow, and that's okay. But my failure to pick sides
> in an argument that happened years ago is somehow a fatal flaw.

> Do you have any idea how stupid and petty and juvenile you look? Of
> course not...you're an Internet geek.

Still trying to make a mountain out of that molehill, are you? If there had been
a pattern there, you might have a point, but prefacing a post with "Jenn mooed:"
instead of "Jenn wrote:" is not quite the same as calling a woman a cow, except,
of course, in the specious nit-picky feeble mind of, oh, say, a Marc Phillips.

> > > > Why is that, Marc? Does it have anything to do with
> > > > you and George's shared animosity towards Arny?
> > > You're assuming that George and I are alone in our animosity. ?That's
> > > a pretty blatant error on your part.

> > Weak, unpersuavsive, if not downright myopic insight. There are many others
> > who
> > despise Arny as reprehensible but also rightly conclude George as being not
> > much
> > better. One can only then assume he has something on you, Marc, and may have
> > threatened to go public with it.

[Remaining tripe snipped.]

[Vinylanach]

On Oct 5, 2:59�pm, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> Boon wrote:
> > > > > Marc, you know the following as incontrovertible fact:
> > > > > 1. George wheedles personal info via private e-mail from others and then
> > > > > has
> > > > > used that against them on rao.
> > > > If they're private emails, then how would I know that as an
> > > > incontrovertible fact?
> > > Don't feign disingenuousness, Marc. Of all the queen-sized hissy fits Paula
> > > Wagner had thrown, this ranked as one of the more flamboyant ones:
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/browse_thread/thread....
> > > wherein George acknowledged
> > > "I didn't ask in confidence, Rev. Fraud. You asked me to treat your
> > > answers in confidence, which I agreed to.
> > > But I chucked that out when it became apparent to me that you're a
> > > loon. A wacko, a nutsy-cuckoo, a fruitcake. What's a promise to a
> > > madman?"
> > And what does this have to do with me? �I don't judge people by the
> > things they say in anger. �Why are you so obsessed with it?
>
> I just vivisected your lame "If they're private emails, then how would I know
> that as an incontrovertible fact?" statement and you affirmed it with your
> feeble response.

No, I actually didn't see you prove any point. More accurately, I
lost interest. You seem determined to dredge up old posts in order to
keep the level of hate and intolerance high. That makes you a troll.

BTW, in order to prove your point, you have to prove that I have
knowledge of this stuff. You haven't done it.

Therefore you are wrong, and you need to apologize.

>
>
> > > > I've told George private things about my life, and he hasn't used them
> > > > against
> > > > me.
> > > Ah-hah, now we're getting somewhere. Could it be that the lowlife sleazeball
> > > has
> > > wheedled damning information from you and wields it like the sword of
> > > Damocles
> > > above your head?
> > No, not at all. �Again, you should stick with the facts. �That's the
> > Achilles' Heel of Internet geeks...endless conjecture, no truth.
> > > You see, Marc, in most all other aspects, you seem to be a
> > > decent, stand-up guy, which makes your standing shoulder-to-shoulder with
> > > George
> > > through thick and thin all the more baffling.
> > Well, if you paid any attention, you'd see that George and I do not
> > agree on everything. �In fact, he and I disagreed about Bob several
> > times. �What did we do? �We discussed it an came to an agreement. �I
> > couldn't imagine doing that with an Internet geek like yourself. �In
> > fact, I've shown you to be wrong several times in the last few days,
> > and what have you done? �You move onto something else without
> > admitting defeat. �On that point alone, George is by far the better
> > man.
>
> You haven't "shown" any such thing, other than delusions of grandeur.
>

That's merely truth by assertion. In other words, you are wrong here
as well. You need to apologize if you're a real man.


> > > > > 2. George repeatedly slandered Greg Singh as having incestual sex with
> > > > > his
> > > > > mother.
> > > > Yes. George and Greg were friends and then had a very public
> > > > blowout. That doesn't make either one a sleazeball, just two people
> > > > who said things in anger.
> > > What other possible word is there to characterize this sort of behavior,
> > > Marc?
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/search?group=rec.aud...
> > Again, you expect me to be some sort of judge and jury here. �Let me
> > illustrate just how pointless your argument is. �Bob Morein and I
> > recently had a blowup because I questioned his statement that SS amps
> > from the '80s were just as good if not better than state-of-the-art
> > designs from today. �The argument escalated to the point where Bob
> > wrote an email to someone he perceived to be my employer complaining
> > about my behavior here. �He then started posting "MARC PHILLIPS IS A
> > BAD AUDIO REVIEWER" all over Usenet. �While his complaints had no
> > effect on my business (mainly because Bob Morein is a well-known
> > Internet whacko), it was his intent that I had a problem with. �This
> > ****ing lunatic tried to ruin my career. �He tried to take food out of
> > the mouths of my children (one of whom has special needs). I want you
> > to compare a scumbag like that with some argument Greg and George had
> > many years ago. �Now see how you look like an idiot.
>
> You're always carping about me using a nom-de-Net and here you are almost the
> victim of the perils of using your real name coupled with a "caustic" posting
> personality that you wear as a badge of honor. Do you realize how idiotic that
> makes you look?

The nom-de-Net isn't the problem here. It's your decision to be on
here for one reason...to stir up trouble by having animosity for
everyone else here. Name one person here you can call an ally. Name
one person here who agrees with you and supports your points. Nope,
you're here for one reason...to work out your frustrations online
because your real life sucks. If it didn't, you would be able to
converse with others here in a way that isn't constantly
confrontational.

You're a relic.


>
> > But here's the point...Art, who stood by my side through the whole
> > incident, told Jenn that she should probably avoid talking to Bob
> > because he had clearly crossed the line. (A few people, including
> > myself, have now killfiled Bob.) �Jenn replied that she still had
> > pleasant conversations with Bob, and that she didn't want to go
> > through and read the threads between Bob and me because she could only
> > handle so many fights at once. �Did I get ****ed at her? �Did I call
> > her myopic? �NO. �I respected her decision to limit the amount of
> > negativity in her life. �That's what grownups do. They don't keep
> > score on The Big Board, harboring resentment for years, like you do.
>
> Live and learn, Boonie. You know Bob's scorched-earth battles with McLardo have
> left him completely unhinged.

And yet he has ostensibly tried hard to move beyond that to be a
productive poster here, and to forget the past. I was ready to be
accommodating to him by engaging him in an honest debate about
something he said. I'm glad I revealed that he is still unhinged, and
I felt I did a service to the group by reminding the others that he
was still volatile. So some good came out of the whole thing.
>
>
>
>
>
> > > > > That you can associate with such a lowlife sleazeball speaks volumes of
> > > > > the
> > > > > type
> > > >> of person you really are.
> > > > You just called Jenn a cow, and you're judging others? ?I choose not
> > > > to associate with you...that's the type of person I really am.
> > > Part of a methane gasbag riff metaphor meant in jest that has you grasping
> > > at
> > > straws to exploit.
> > Nope. �This is where you look like a real scumbag. �You just got
> > caught being a major hypocrite, and your whole argument just fell
> > apart. �Yet you try to skip away as if nothing happened. �You just
> > called a woman a cow, and that's okay. �But my failure to pick sides
> > in an argument that happened years ago is somehow a fatal flaw.
> > Do you have any idea how stupid and petty and juvenile you look? �Of
> > course not...you're an Internet geek.
>
> Still trying to make a mountain out of that molehill, are you? If there had been
> a pattern there, you might have a point, but prefacing a post with "Jenn mooed:"instead of "Jenn wrote:" is not quite the same as calling a woman a cow, except,
>
> of course, in the specious nit-picky feeble mind of, oh, say, a Marc Phillips.

Yet you're doing the opposite by trying to downplay your misogynist,
homphobic comments here. I'm not making a mountain out of a molehill.
I'm merely making a simple point that completely undermines your
credibility. No wonder you keep running away from it.

>
> > > > > Why is that, Marc? Does it have anything to do with
> > > > > you and George's shared animosity towards Arny?
> > > > You're assuming that George and I are alone in our animosity. ?That's
> > > > a pretty blatant error on your part.
> > > Weak, unpersuavsive, if not downright myopic insight. There are many others
> > > who
> > > despise Arny as reprehensible but also rightly conclude George as being not
> > > much
> > > better. One can only then assume he has something on you, Marc, and may have
> > > threatened to go public with it.
>
> [Remaining tripe snipped.]-

Because you have no answer for it. A real man would stand up and say
he was wrong. Pussy.

Boon

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Vinylanach said:

> A real man would stand up and say he was wrong.

OTOH, a real 'borg runs away and eats a plateful of turds.

[Vinylanach]

On Oct 5, 4:10�pm, George M. Middius > wrote:
> Vinylanach said:
>
> > A real man would stand up and say he was wrong.
>
> OTOH, a real 'borg runs away and eats a plateful of turds.

Yup. I'm wondering how long Sophomoric lasts. I hope he sticks
around for target practice, since Arny seems to be spending more time
thinking about the conundrum of his salvation these days.

Boon

[Sophistic]

Boon prattled:

> A real man would stand up and say he was wrong.

The only thing I was wrong about was believing you to still be a "decent,
stand-up guy." Siding with the MidYut has rubbed off on you so that you now
engage in the same intellectual dishonesty he Pudge routinely traffics in.

> Pussy.

Fag hag.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Clyde Slick said:

> > Isn't Styncho special? He only pretends to have the mindset of a
> > 13-year-old. But he does do it well.
>
> isn't it curious? they both come back at just around the same time?

Just like you and your sober evil twin.

[Vinylanach]

On Oct 5, 4:35�pm, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> Boon prattled:
>
> > A real man would stand up and say he was wrong.
>
> The only thing I was wrong about was believing you to still be a "decent,
> stand-up guy." Siding with the MidYut has rubbed off on you so that you now
> engage in the same intellectual dishonesty he Pudge routinely traffics in..
>
> > Pussy.
>
> Fag hag.

So let me get this straight...I'm a bad person because I refuse to go
back and pick sides on every Usenet argument George has ever had over
the last decade, and you're a good person because you call women cows
and make homophobic comments to complete strangers. I mean, that's the
position you're trying to defend here.

Boon

[Jenn[_3_]]

In article
>,
Vinylanach > wrote:

> So let me get this straight...I'm a bad person because I refuse to go
> back and pick sides on every Usenet argument George has ever had over
> the last decade

Join the club.

[Vinylanach]

On Oct 5, 10:08�pm, Jenn > wrote:
> In article
> >,
>
> �Vinylanach > wrote:
> > So let me get this straight...I'm a bad person because I refuse to go
> > back and pick sides on every Usenet argument George has ever had over
> > the last decade
>
> Join the club.

Yes, Sophomoric has become very Arny-like during his return, hasn't
he.

Boon

[Sophistic]

Jenn seconded:

> Vinylanach > wrote:

>> So let me get this straight...I'm a bad person because I refuse to go
>> back and pick sides on every Usenet argument George has ever had over
>> the last decade

> Join the club.

Hey Jenn, are you a member of the MidYut fanc club, too, along with Boonie?

The very same lowlife sleazeball who said this:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/msg/9a46f23fbb03abb3

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Margaret von B. said:


> > Hi Margie-Baby! May I call you Margie-Baby?
> Hi George!
> Naturally you can call me anything you want :-)


Anything other than "nasty dripping gash", I presume. :-)

--------------------------------------------------------------------

[Vinylanach]

On Oct 5, 10:34�pm, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> Jenn seconded:
>
> > Vinylanach > wrote:
> >> So let me get this straight...I'm a bad person because I refuse to go
> >> back and pick sides on every Usenet argument George has ever had over
> >> the last decade
> > Join the club.
>
> Hey Jenn, are you a member of the MidYut fanc club, too, along with Boonie?
>
> The very same lowlife sleazeball who said this:http://groups.google.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/msg/9a46f23fbb03abb3
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Margaret von B. said:
>
> > > Hi Margie-Baby! May I call you Margie-Baby?
> > Hi George!
> > Naturally you can call me anything you want :-)
>
> Anything other than "nasty dripping gash", I presume. :-)
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------

Margaret von B. was a man, genius.

Boon

[Sophistic]

Boon prattled:

> > > A real man would stand up and say he was wrong.

> > The only thing I was wrong about was believing you to still be a "decent,
> > stand-up guy." Siding with the MidYut has rubbed off on you so that you now
> > engage in the same intellectual dishonesty he Pudge routinely traffics in.

> > > Pussy.

> > Fag hag.

> So let me get this straight...I'm a bad person because I refuse to go
> back and pick sides on every Usenet argument George has ever had over
> the last decade, and you're a good person because you call women cows
> and make homophobic comments to complete strangers. I mean, that's the
> position you're trying to defend here.

The above comment stands. Go ahead and twist yourself into a pretzel trying to
avoid the gist of the matter.

[Jenn[_3_]]

In article >,
"Sophistic" > wrote:

> Jenn seconded:
>
> > Vinylanach > wrote:
>
> >> So let me get this straight...I'm a bad person because I refuse to go
> >> back and pick sides on every Usenet argument George has ever had over
> >> the last decade
>
> > Join the club.
>
> Hey Jenn, are you a member of the MidYut fanc club, too, along with Boonie?
>
> The very same lowlife sleazeball who said this:
> http://groups.google.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/msg/9a46f23fbb03abb3

George knows exactly how I feel about those kind of posts.

[Vinylanach]

On Oct 5, 10:39�pm, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> Boon prattled:
>
> > > > A real man would stand up and say he was wrong.
> > > The only thing I was wrong about was believing you to still be a "decent,
> > > stand-up guy." Siding with the MidYut has rubbed off on you so that you now
> > > engage in the same intellectual dishonesty he Pudge routinely traffics in.
> > > > Pussy.
> > > Fag hag.
> > So let me get this straight...I'm a bad person because I refuse to go
> > back and pick sides on every Usenet argument George has ever had over
> > the last decade, and you're a good person because you call women cows
> > and make homophobic comments to complete strangers. I mean, that's the
> > position you're trying to defend here.
>
> The above comment stands. Go ahead and twist yourself into a pretzel trying to
> avoid the gist of the matter.

I don't have to twist myself into anything. I'll let it stand as
well. I just don't see anyone coming to your aid or slapping you on
the back. That should be a hint on just how much you've lost control
of your life.

Boon

[Sophistic]

Boon prattled:

> > > > A real man would stand up and say he was wrong.
> > > The only thing I was wrong about was believing you to still be a "decent,
> > > stand-up guy." Siding with the MidYut has rubbed off on you so that you
> > > now
> > > engage in the same intellectual dishonesty he Pudge routinely traffics in.
> > > > Pussy.
> > > Fag hag.
> > So let me get this straight...I'm a bad person because I refuse to go
> > back and pick sides on every Usenet argument George has ever had over
> > the last decade, and you're a good person because you call women cows
> > and make homophobic comments to complete strangers. I mean, that's the
> > position you're trying to defend here.
>
> The above comment stands. Go ahead and twist yourself into a pretzel trying to
> avoid the gist of the matter.

I don't have to twist myself into anything. I'll let it stand as
well. I just don't see anyone coming to your aid or slapping you on
the back. That should be a hint on just how much you've lost control
of your life.

There you go again, flailing away, taking stabs in the dark of thing you know
not of.

[Vinylanach]

On Oct 5, 10:48�pm, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> �Boon prattled:
>
> > > > > A real man would stand up and say he was wrong.
> > > > The only thing I was wrong about was believing you to still be a "decent,
> > > > stand-up guy." Siding with the MidYut has rubbed off on you so that you
> > > > now
> > > > engage in the same intellectual dishonesty he Pudge routinely traffics in.
> > > > > Pussy.
> > > > Fag hag.
> > > So let me get this straight...I'm a bad person because I refuse to go
> > > back and pick sides on every Usenet argument George has ever had over
> > > the last decade, and you're a good person because you call women cows
> > > and make homophobic comments to complete strangers. I mean, that's the
> > > position you're trying to defend here.
>
> > The above comment stands. Go ahead and twist yourself into a pretzel trying to
> > avoid the gist of the matter.
>
> I don't have to twist myself into anything. �I'll let it stand as
> well. �I just don't see anyone coming to your aid or slapping you on
> the back. �That should be a hint on just how much you've lost control
> of your life.
>
> There you go again, flailing away, taking stabs in the dark of thing you know
> not of.

It's funny that you talk about hypocrisy. You're complaining about
George's treatment of Greg Singh, but I just looked you up on Google,
and the fourth post listed has you saying the following about Greg:

"Yep, he's one sikh, stinkhin' septikh tankh of a skhrewball."

Yes, you're a paragon of virtue, arent you. LOL!

Boon

[Sophistic]

Boon prattled:
>
> > > > > A real man would stand up and say he was wrong.
> > > > The only thing I was wrong about was believing you to still be a
> > > > "decent,
> > > > stand-up guy." Siding with the MidYut has rubbed off on you so that you
> > > > now
> > > > engage in the same intellectual dishonesty he Pudge routinely traffics
> > > > in.
> > > > > Pussy.
> > > > Fag hag.
> > > So let me get this straight...I'm a bad person because I refuse to go
> > > back and pick sides on every Usenet argument George has ever had over
> > > the last decade, and you're a good person because you call women cows
> > > and make homophobic comments to complete strangers. I mean, that's the
> > > position you're trying to defend here.
>
> > The above comment stands. Go ahead and twist yourself into a pretzel trying
> > to
> > avoid the gist of the matter.
>
> I don't have to twist myself into anything. ?I'll let it stand as
> well. ?I just don't see anyone coming to your aid or slapping you on
> the back. ?That should be a hint on just how much you've lost control
> of your life.
>
> There you go again, flailing away, taking stabs in the dark of thing you know
> not of.

It's funny that you talk about hypocrisy. You're complaining about
George's treatment of Greg Singh, but I just looked you up on Google,
and the fourth post listed has you saying the following about Greg:

"Yep, he's one sikh, stinkhin' septikh tankh of a skhrewball."

Yes, you're a paragon of virtue, arent you. LOL!

Still spinning, still avoiding, still fooling no one but yourself.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Jenn said:

[link to banter with "Margaret"]

> George knows exactly how I feel about those kind of posts.

Stynchie, you know you've hit bottom when all you can do is tattle to
Mistress Jenn. It's pathetic when the Krooborg and Witlessmongrel do it,
and just as much so when you do it.

Would JEE-zus approve of you inflaming every exchange with your bilious
spew of hatred and acrimony? I don't think he would. Looks like you're
going to Hell.

[Vinylanach]

On Oct 6, 10:17�am, George M. Middius >
wrote:
> Jenn said:
>
> [link to banter with "Margaret"]
>
> > George knows exactly how I feel about those kind of posts.
>
> Stynchie, you know you've hit bottom when all you can do is tattle to
> Mistress Jenn. It's pathetic when the Krooborg and Witlessmongrel do it,
> and just as much so when you do it.
>
> Would JEE-zus approve of you inflaming every exchange with your bilious
> spew of hatred and acrimony? I don't think he would. Looks like you're
> going to Hell.

Oh, ****...is this loser another Christian, too? That would explain
the blatant hypocrisy (not to mention the misogyny and homophobia).

Boon

[Sophistic]

Pudge the Gimp minced:

> Jenn said:

> [link to banter with "Margaret"]

>> George knows exactly how I feel about those kind of posts.

> Stynchie, you know you've hit bottom when all you can do is tattle to
> Mistress Jenn. It's pathetic when the Krooborg and Witlessmongrel do it,
> and just as much so when you do it.

Ancillary to pointing out what a lowlife sleazeball you are Pudge. You provide a
wealth of information to work with. You can't help it. It's your nature.

Just wanted to see if Jenn would overlook your depravity, since you're both part
of the so-called LGBT "community."

[Sophistic]

Boonie reeks himself out again:

> That would explain the blatant hypocrisy

My suspicions about your alliance with the MidYut were, to paraphrase you,
'conjecturing by an Internet geek' but your conjectures about my motivations for
showing up and posting on rao along with a lot aspects of my personal life
(which you know nothing about) were based on a foundation about as solid as a
house of cards. Like I said, Boonie, 'how often do you reek yourself right out
of the room with the overbearing stench of your own hypocrisy'?

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Vinylanach said:

> > [link to banter with "Margaret"]
> >
> > > George knows exactly how I feel about those kind of posts.
> >
> > Stynchie, you know you've hit bottom when all you can do is tattle to
> > Mistress Jenn. It's pathetic when the Krooborg and Witlessmongrel do it,
> > and just as much so when you do it.
> >
> > Would JEE-zus approve of you inflaming every exchange with your bilious
> > spew of hatred and acrimony? I don't think he would. Looks like you're
> > going to Hell.
>
> Oh, ****...is this loser another Christian, too? That would explain
> the blatant hypocrisy (not to mention the misogyny and homophobia).

Not exactly. Blobbo is a 'christian', a lot like the Krooborg's
'kristianity'. It's just a rag he waves around because he thinks saying it
gives him a free pass for being a ****.

[Vinylanach]

On Oct 6, 1:34�pm, George M. Middius > wrote:
> Vinylanach said:
>
> > > [link to banter with "Margaret"]
>
> > > > George knows exactly how I feel about those kind of posts.
>
> > > Stynchie, you know you've hit bottom when all you can do is tattle to
> > > Mistress Jenn. It's pathetic when the Krooborg and Witlessmongrel do it,
> > > and just as much so when you do it.
>
> > > Would JEE-zus approve of you inflaming every exchange with your bilious
> > > spew of hatred and acrimony? I don't think he would. Looks like you're
> > > going to Hell.
>
> > Oh, ****...is this loser another Christian, too? �That would explain
> > the blatant hypocrisy (not to mention the misogyny and homophobia).
>
> Not exactly. Blobbo is a 'christian', a lot like the Krooborg's
> 'kristianity'. It's just a rag he waves around because he thinks saying it
> gives him a free pass for being a ****.

If I subjected him to the same line of questioning that I did Scott,
do you think he would fold sooner or later?

Boon

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Vinylanach said:

> > > > Would JEE-zus approve of you inflaming every exchange with your bilious
> > > > spew of hatred and acrimony? I don't think he would. Looks like you're
> > > > going to Hell.
> >
> > > Oh, ****...is this loser another Christian, too? ?That would explain
> > > the blatant hypocrisy (not to mention the misogyny and homophobia).
> >
> > Not exactly. Blobbo is a 'christian', a lot like the Krooborg's
> > 'kristianity'. It's just a rag he waves around because he thinks saying it
> > gives him a free pass for being a ****.
>
> If I subjected him to the same line of questioning that I did Scott,
> do you think he would fold sooner or later?

Didn't Scottie end up denying that he's a christian at all? I'm sure that
was a lie. Styncho wouldn't do that. My guess is Blobbo would react the
way the Krooborg did: He'd load up his snotgun with low-caliber cartridges
full of "debating trade" and blast away. Stynchie would look for any
opportunity to throw insults and he'd spew hypocrisy and doubletalk every
which way. Good luck! <G>

[Vinylanach]

On Oct 6, 4:15�pm, George M. Middius > wrote:
> Vinylanach said:
>
> > > > > Would JEE-zus approve of you inflaming every exchange with your bilious
> > > > > spew of hatred and acrimony? I don't think he would. Looks like you're
> > > > > going to Hell.
>
> > > > Oh, ****...is this loser another Christian, too? ?That would explain
> > > > the blatant hypocrisy (not to mention the misogyny and homophobia).
>
> > > Not exactly. Blobbo is a 'christian', a lot like the Krooborg's
> > > 'kristianity'. It's just a rag he waves around because he thinks saying it
> > > gives him a free pass for being a ****.
>
> > If I subjected him to the same line of questioning that I did Scott,
> > do you think he would fold sooner or later?
>
> Didn't Scottie end up denying that he's a christian at all? I'm sure that
> was a lie. Styncho wouldn't do that. My guess is Blobbo would react the
> way the Krooborg did: He'd load up his snotgun with low-caliber cartridges
> full of "debating trade" and blast away. Stynchie would look for any
> opportunity to throw insults and he'd spew hypocrisy and doubletalk every
> which way. Good luck! <G>

When I brought it up with Arny, he ran the other way. Christians know
that they can't beat logic and reason. That's why the church has
always been active in developing countries. It's easy to sell fairy
tales to primitive and superstitious cultures.

Boon