So 2pid...

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

Do you 'think' my recent OT posts about Palin and McCain were "on the
mark" and that they brought up "interesting" points for 'discussion',
'helping' to 'save' RAO?

Or do you think they were dumb, poorly-thought-out and made me look
stupid, even imbecilic?

Just curious. LoL.

[Vinylanach]

On Sep 10, 2:42�pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Sep 10, 2:28�pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > wrote:
> > Do you 'think' my recent OT posts about Palin and McCain were "on the
> > mark" and that they brought up "interesting" points for 'discussion',
> > 'helping' to 'save' RAO?
>
> �Sorry, I didn't read it given your inability to create or sustain
> any form of civil discourse which, based on the volume of
> replies to your posts, seems to be the general consensus.
> There are some disadvantages to being an ass of your
> magnitude.

I think that's what people have been saying about you and your
excessive OT posting. But you knew that.

Boon

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Vinylanach said:

> > > Do you 'think' my recent OT posts about Palin and McCain were "on the
> > > mark" and that they brought up "interesting" points for 'discussion',
> > > 'helping' to 'save' RAO?
> >
> > ?Sorry, I didn't read it given your inability to create or sustain
> > any form of civil discourse which, based on the volume of
> > replies to your posts, seems to be the general consensus.
> > There are some disadvantages to being an ass of your
> > magnitude.
>
> I think that's what people have been saying about you and your
> excessive OT posting. But you knew that.

Want to bet? <G>

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Sep 10, 4:42*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Sep 10, 2:28*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > wrote:
> > Do you 'think' my recent OT posts about Palin and McCain were "on the
> > mark" and that they brought up "interesting" points for 'discussion',
> > 'helping' to 'save' RAO?
>
> *Sorry, I didn't read it given your inability to create or sustain
> any form of civil discourse which, based on the volume of
> replies to your posts, seems to be the general consensus.
> There are some disadvantages to being an ass of your
> magnitude.

And you expect people to read yours. LoL.

Calling you an "imbecile" *is* "civil discourse". Do you know why? LoL.