Suggested Subject Titles for ScottW's Next 10 OT Threads...

[Vinylanach]

1. Uh
2. I think
3. Hey
4. Wait
5. Hey you
6. If
7. When
8. Why
9. No
10. Yes

Boon

[Vinylanach]

Of course I forgot to put the all important "OT:" in front of each
subject line. We all know how important that is.

Boon

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Aug 27, 5:02*pm, Vinylanach > wrote:
> 1. Uh
> 2. I think
> 3. Hey
> 4. Wait
> 5. Hey you
> 6. If
> 7. When
> 8. Why
> 9. No
> 10. Yes
>
> Boon

You did not spell #1 correctly, which makes you a poor writer.

Please insert the "D" in its proper position.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Shhhh! said:

> > 1. Uh
> > 2. I think
> > 3. Hey
> > 4. Wait
> > 5. Hey you
> > 6. If
> > 7. When
> > 8. Why
> > 9. No
> > 10. Yes

> You did not spell #1 correctly, which makes you a poor writer.
> Please insert the "D" in its proper position.

Your not the write one to give out D's. You probably flunked everything in
O School. You're a F man.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Aug 29, 1:00*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=163693
>
> " I'm actually putting a little edge on my criticism just to make up
> for the fact that on MSNBC last night somebody said, quote, "it wasn't
> a speech: it was a symphony." I'm sorry; I won't even name who did it.
> I am here to balance that bit of fatuous -- fatuous suck-upping!"


What a biting indictment from one of RAO's most balanced and
insightful 'thinkers'.

> LoL.

Agreed.

[MiNe 109]

In article
>,
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote:

> On Aug 29, 1:00*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> > http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=163693
> >
> > " I'm actually putting a little edge on my criticism just to make up
> > for the fact that on MSNBC last night somebody said, quote, "it wasn't
> > a speech: it was a symphony." I'm sorry; I won't even name who did it.
> > I am here to balance that bit of fatuous -- fatuous suck-upping!"
>
>
> What a biting indictment from one of RAO's most balanced and
> insightful 'thinkers'.
>
> > LoL.
>
> Agreed.

For Suck-upping, that doesn't hold a candle to the master:

http://powerlineblog.com/archives/011183.php

It must be very strange to be President Bush. A man of extraordinary
vision and brilliance approaching to genius, he can't get anyone to
notice. He is like a great painter or musician who is ahead of his time,
and who unveils one masterpiece after another to a reception that, when
not bored, is hostile.

--

Stephen

[MiNe 109]

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On Aug 29, 12:40*pm, MiNe 109 > wrote:
> > In article
> > >,
> > *"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote:
> >
> > > On Aug 29, 1:00*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> > > >http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=163693
> >
> > > > " I'm actually putting a little edge on my criticism just to make up
> > > > for the fact that on MSNBC last night somebody said, quote, "it wasn't
> > > > a speech: it was a symphony." I'm sorry; I won't even name who did it.
> > > > I am here to balance that bit of fatuous -- fatuous suck-upping!"
> >
> > > What a biting indictment from one of RAO's most balanced and
> > > insightful 'thinkers'.
> >
> > > > LoL.
> >
> > > Agreed.
> >
> > For Suck-upping, that doesn't hold a candle to the master:
> >
> > http://powerlineblog.com/archives/011183.php
> >
> > It must be very strange to be President Bush. A man of extraordinary
> > vision and brilliance approaching to genius, he can't get anyone to
> > notice. He is like a great painter or musician who is ahead of his time,
> > and who unveils one masterpiece after another to a reception that, when
> > not bored, is hostile.
>
> Passing on the substance again I see. Let me fill you in.

Nope.

> The next paragraph was:
>
> "Hyperbolic? Well, maybe. But consider Bush's latest master stroke:
> the Asia Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate. The
> pact includes the U.S., Japan, Australia, China, India and South
> Korea; these six countries account for most of the world's carbon
> emissions. The treaty is, in essence, a technology transfer agreement.
> The U.S., Japan and Australia will share advanced pollution control
> technology, and the pact's members will contribute to a fund that will
> help implement the technologies. The details are still sketchy and
> more countries may be admitted to the group later on. The pact's
> stated goal is to cut production of "greenhouse gases" in half by the
> end of the century."
>
> Just in cased you missed it and if you believe in AGW,
> you should be celebrating this accomplishment.
> Instead you choose to prove Hinderacker's point.

No, it's still crap.

> I believe Obama said repeatedly, you need to be changed.

Looking forward to his election.

Stephen

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Aug 29, 2:54*pm, ScottW > wrote:

> Just in cased you missed it and if you believe in AGW,
> you should be celebrating this accomplishment.
> Instead you choose to prove Hinderacker's point.
> I believe Obama said repeatedly, you need to be changed.

Or you could read that as evidence that bushie realizes his historical
legacy is not very good and he is trying to change that.

History will tell the tale, 2pid. You apparently think bushie's
presidential legacy will be a good one. Several people have differing
POVs. LOL!

[MiNe 109]

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On Aug 29, 12:40*pm, MiNe 109 > wrote:
> > In article
> > >,
> > *"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote:
> >
> > > On Aug 29, 1:00*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> > > >http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=163693
> >
> > > > " I'm actually putting a little edge on my criticism just to make up
> > > > for the fact that on MSNBC last night somebody said, quote, "it wasn't
> > > > a speech: it was a symphony." I'm sorry; I won't even name who did it.
> > > > I am here to balance that bit of fatuous -- fatuous suck-upping!"
> >
> > > What a biting indictment from one of RAO's most balanced and
> > > insightful 'thinkers'.
> >
> > > > LoL.
> >
> > > Agreed.
> >
> > For Suck-upping, that doesn't hold a candle to the master:
> >
> > http://powerlineblog.com/archives/011183.php
> >
> > It must be very strange to be President Bush. A man of extraordinary
> > vision and brilliance approaching to genius, he can't get anyone to
> > notice. He is like a great painter or musician who is ahead of his time,
> > and who unveils one masterpiece after another to a reception that, when
> > not bored, is hostile.
>
> Passing on the substance again I see. <snip>

Yes, the same way you passed on the substance of Obama's speech. Isn't
it good your quoted example shows some self-awareness and the intent to
self-edit? Those qualities are somewhat absent in the powerline example.

Stephen

[MiNe 109]

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On Aug 29, 1:27*pm, MiNe 109 > wrote:
> > In article
> > >,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > On Aug 29, 12:40*pm, MiNe 109 * > wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > >,
> > > > *"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote:
> >
> > > > > On Aug 29, 1:00*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > >http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=163693
> >
> > > > > > " I'm actually putting a little edge on my criticism just to make
> > > > > > up
> > > > > > for the fact that on MSNBC last night somebody said, quote, "it
> > > > > > wasn't
> > > > > > a speech: it was a symphony." I'm sorry; I won't even name who did
> > > > > > it.
> > > > > > I am here to balance that bit of fatuous -- fatuous suck-upping!"
> >
> > > > > What a biting indictment from one of RAO's most balanced and
> > > > > insightful 'thinkers'.
> >
> > > > > > LoL.
> >
> > > > > Agreed.
> >
> > > > For Suck-upping, that doesn't hold a candle to the master:
> >
> > > >http://powerlineblog.com/archives/011183.php
> >
> > > > It must be very strange to be President Bush. A man of extraordinary
> > > > vision and brilliance approaching to genius, he can't get anyone to
> > > > notice. He is like a great painter or musician who is ahead of his
> > > > time,
> > > > and who unveils one masterpiece after another to a reception that, when
> > > > not bored, is hostile.
> >
> > > Passing on the substance again I see. <snip>
> >
> > Yes, the same way you passed on the substance of Obama's speech.
>
> I don't recall commenting on Obama's speech at all.

Yes, that's what I meant when I said, "you passed on the substance of
Obama's speech." Since the subject was fatuous up-sucking, the substance
is secondary, which made it odd you came to the Hindrocket's defense.

> Would you really like me to comment on every little thing that
> happens? LoL

Yes, it only seems like you do.

STephen

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Aug 29, 8:46*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Aug 29, 6:27*pm, MiNe 109 * > wrote:

> > *ScottW > wrote:

> > > *Would you really like me to comment on every little thing that
> > > happens? LoL
>
> > Yes, it only seems like you do.
>
> *I don't think sssshhhhtard is going to like your idea.

I don't really care, 2pid. As I've said, I enjoy tearing apart your
stupidity. So, as usual, when you try to guess what somebody else
likes or dislikes, you're wrong.

Your posting more tripe would only mean a move from a very "target-
rich environment" to a turkey shoot.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Aug 29, 9:14*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Aug 29, 7:10*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > wrote:
> > On Aug 29, 8:46*pm, ScottW > wrote:
>
> > > On Aug 29, 6:27*pm, MiNe 109 * > wrote:
> > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > *Would you really like me to comment on every little thing that
> > > > > happens? LoL
>
> > > > Yes, it only seems like you do.
>
> > > *I don't think sssshhhhtard is going to like your idea.
>
> > I don't really care, 2pid. As I've said, I enjoy tearing apart your
> > stupidity.
>
> Ah yes, you came, you farted, you conquered....again.
> Congratulations. *LoL.

So tell me, 2pid: which aircraft is "less obsolete": the F-101 Voodoo,
which is supersonic and was introduced about the same time as the
MiG-21, or the A-4 Skyhawk, which is not capable of supersonic speed?

You've hinged your entire counter-argument on the fact that I
mistakenly said "MiG-17" instead of "MiG-21" ragrding the Chinese air
force. I want to know how that changed my basic argument, 2pid.

Hint: it didn't. LoL.

[Harry Lavo]

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote in message
...
On Aug 29, 2:54 pm, ScottW > wrote:

> Just in cased you missed it and if you believe in AGW,
> you should be celebrating this accomplishment.
> Instead you choose to prove Hinderacker's point.
> I believe Obama said repeatedly, you need to be changed.

Or you could read that as evidence that bushie realizes his historical
legacy is not very good and he is trying to change that.

History will tell the tale, 2pid. You apparently think bushie's
presidential legacy will be a good one. Several people have differing
POVs. LOL!

************************************88

(Anybody know how to get the ">'s" working again in Outlook Express's
Newsreader...they just seem t have quit and I can't fina a setting to
restore them.)

The only issue is will history rate him the worst in history, or just among
the worst.

[MiNe 109]

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On Aug 29, 6:27*pm, MiNe 109 > wrote:
> > In article
> > >,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > On Aug 29, 1:27*pm, MiNe 109 * > wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > >,
> >
> > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > On Aug 29, 12:40*pm, MiNe 109 * > wrote:
> > > > > > In article
> > > > > > >,
> > > > > > *"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > On Aug 29, 1:00*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > > > >http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=163693
> >
> > > > > > > > " I'm actually putting a little edge on my criticism just to
> > > > > > > > make
> > > > > > > > up
> > > > > > > > for the fact that on MSNBC last night somebody said, quote, "it
> > > > > > > > wasn't
> > > > > > > > a speech: it was a symphony." I'm sorry; I won't even name who
> > > > > > > > did
> > > > > > > > it.
> > > > > > > > I am here to balance that bit of fatuous -- fatuous
> > > > > > > > suck-upping!"
> >
> > > > > > > What a biting indictment from one of RAO's most balanced and
> > > > > > > insightful 'thinkers'.
> >
> > > > > > > > LoL.
> >
> > > > > > > Agreed.
> >
> > > > > > For Suck-upping, that doesn't hold a candle to the master:
> >
> > > > > >http://powerlineblog.com/archives/011183.php
> >
> > > > > > It must be very strange to be President Bush. A man of
> > > > > > extraordinary
> > > > > > vision and brilliance approaching to genius, he can't get anyone to
> > > > > > notice. He is like a great painter or musician who is ahead of his
> > > > > > time,
> > > > > > and who unveils one masterpiece after another to a reception that,
> > > > > > when
> > > > > > not bored, is hostile.
> >
> > > > > Passing on the substance again I see. <snip>
> >
> > > > Yes, the same way you passed on the substance of Obama's speech.
> >
> > > * I don't recall commenting on Obama's speech at all.
> >
> > Yes, that's what I meant when I said, "you passed on the substance of
> > Obama's speech." Since the subject was fatuous up-sucking, the substance
> > is secondary,
>
> Substance is never secondary, except to Jenn.

Keep your arms inside the bus.

> > which made it odd you came to the Hindrocket's defense.
>
> He had a valid point.

Which he got to after a paragraph of world-class sucking up.

> > > *Would you really like me to comment on every little thing that
> > > happens? LoL
> >
> > Yes, it only seems like you do.
>
> I don't think sssshhhhtard is going to like your idea.

Hey, you're making stuff up again.

Stephen

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

MiNe 109 said:

> Hey, you're making stuff up again.

This is your round of the Scottie Game, and you didn't ring the bell.