What will Scottiedork doooooooo? ow-wow-WOOOOOOOOOOOO!

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Vice President Joseph Biden. How's that sound, Witless?

The liberal's liberal. The excruciatingly intellectual, ivory-tower-loving,
bleeding-heart archetype of the modern American liberal politician. A mere
heartbeat away from the Presidency.

Can you imagine what Biden would do if something happened to Obama? We'd have
responsible government. No wars motivated by radical ideology. No keys to the
Treasury for the oil companies. Real action on greenhouse emissions instead of
the stalling tactics used by the dinosaur ****uplicans.

Scottie, you'll be moving to Mexico, right? Even better: I heard Jesse Ventura
wants to move to some little island in the Pacific and declare himself General
For Life. You can go be one of his minions and not have to pay all those taxes
that twist you into a pretzel.

[Clyde Slick]

On 23 Aug, 01:12, George M. Middius > wrote:

>
> Can you imagine what Biden would do if something happened to Obama?

Your email came at 1:00 AM?
Mine didn't come till 3.
Good choice!!

[Clyde Slick]

On 23 Aug, 01:12, George M. Middius > wrote:
> Vice President Joseph Biden. How's that sound, Witless?
>
> The liberal's liberal. The excruciatingly intellectual, ivory-tower-loving,
> bleeding-heart archetype of the modern American liberal politician. A mere
> heartbeat away from the Presidency.
>
> Can you imagine what Biden would do if something happened to Obama? We'd have
> responsible government. No wars motivated by radical ideology. No keys to the
> Treasury for the oil companies. Real action on greenhouse emissions instead of
> the stalling tactics used by the dinosaur ****uplicans.
>
> Scottie, you'll be moving to Mexico, right? Even better: I heard Jesse Ventura
> wants to move to some little island in the Pacific and declare himself General
> For Life. You can go be one of his minions and not have to pay all those taxes
> that twist you into a pretzel.

i meant text message

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Scottie yaps furiously in a vain attempt to hide his horror.

> > Vice President Joseph Biden. How's that sound, Witless?

> A little more on that here.

You snipped my pointed questions, Poochie.

> > The liberal's liberal. The excruciatingly intellectual, ivory-tower-loving,
> > bleeding-heart archetype of the modern American liberal politician. A mere
> > heartbeat away from the Presidency.

> > Can you imagine what Biden would do if something happened to Obama? We'd have
> > responsible government. No wars motivated by radical ideology. No keys to the
> > Treasury for the oil companies. Real action on greenhouse emissions instead of
> > the stalling tactics used by the dinosaur ****uplicans.

> > Scottie, you'll be moving to Mexico, right? Even better: I heard Jesse Ventura
> > wants to move to some little island in the Pacific and declare himself General
> > For Life. You can go be one of his minions and not have to pay all those taxes
> > that twist you into a pretzel.

Why didn't you acknowledge the truths I spoke? Cat got your tongue?

> "Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr. (D-Del.), in his first 12 minutes of
> questioning the nominee, managed to get off only one question.
[etc etc etc]

What is your 'point' supposed to be, moron?

> Why that springs [George the Great]

Did you say it "springs" me, moron?

> is one of God's mysterious ways.

Again with the religious crapola.

> http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2008/08/the_case_against_joe_biden.html

What was it you said about the MSM, moron? If I remember correctly, they're
untrustworthy, biased, subject to political censorship.... anything else?

Now that you've joined the enemy, will you be singing the praises of the
Washington Post from now until November? The Post's editorial page is rightly
known as a substantially liberal. Is that the right company for you to keep,
moron?

[Jenn[_3_]]

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On Aug 23, 9:09*am, ScottW > wrote:
> > On Aug 22, 10:12*pm, George M. Middius >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Vice President Joseph Biden. How's that sound, Witless?
> >
> > *All the republican need do is play Biden's pontificating during the
> > Alito
> > confirmation hearings. *It clearly revealed what an ass he is.
>
> A little more on that here.
>
> "Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr. (D-Del.), in his first 12 minutes of
> questioning the nominee, managed to get off only one question.
> Instead, during his 30-minute round of questioning, Biden spoke about
> his own Irish American roots, his "Grandfather Finnegan," his son's
> application to Princeton (he attended the University of Pennsylvania
> instead, Biden said), a speech the senator gave on the Princeton
> campus, the fact that Biden is "not a Princeton fan," and his views on
> the eyeglasses of Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.)."
>
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/10/AR200601100156
> 0.html
>
> Why that springs the Middiot is one of God's mysterious ways.
>
> Still ssshtard has got to love a guy who says,
> "I think I have a much higher IQ than you do."
>
> http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2008/08/the_case_against_joe_biden.htm
> l
>
> I have to wonder what Obama thinks this guy really
> brings to the campaign. He's boring, nasty, egotistical,
> and a loose cannon. 20 years of erratic senate votes
> and tons of video showing he's a problem in Washington
> insider politics, not a solution. Is this change?
>
> From a republican perspective I'm happy with the choice
> as I think Biden is not a boost to the campaign for
> independent or undecided voters. Certainly he does
> nothing to bring the Hillary renegades into the fold.
>
> But from the perspective of hoping that Obama is really
> an agent of change as he claims for the dysfunctional politics
> that rule Washington, this choice is anything but
> evidence of that.
>
> ScottW

I think that Biden will help a great deal, especially in the rust belt.
He's huge on family values, especially in comparison to McCain, huge on
world politics.

Who do you think McCain will choose? Romney or the Minnesota guy? I
don't see the religious right warming up to Romney. I think that the
Mormonism hurts him there. Their beliefs are just so different from
main stream Christianity. Then again, there are A LOT of Mormon voters.

[Clyde Slick]

On 23 Aug, 16:10, Jenn > wrote:
> In article
> >,
>
>
>
>
>
> *ScottW > wrote:
> > On Aug 23, 9:09*am, ScottW > wrote:
> > > On Aug 22, 10:12*pm, George M. Middius >
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > Vice President Joseph Biden. How's that sound, Witless?
>
> > > *All the republican need do is play Biden's pontificating during the
> > > Alito
> > > confirmation hearings. *It clearly revealed what an ass he is.
>
> > A little more on that here.
>
> > "Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr. (D-Del.), in his first 12 minutes of
> > questioning the nominee, managed to get off only one question.
> > Instead, during his 30-minute round of questioning, Biden spoke about
> > his own Irish American roots, his "Grandfather Finnegan," his son's
> > application to Princeton (he attended the University of Pennsylvania
> > instead, Biden said), a speech the senator gave on the Princeton
> > campus, the fact that Biden is "not a Princeton fan," and his views on
> > the eyeglasses of Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.)."
>
> >http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/10/AR200...
> > 0.html
>
> > Why that springs the Middiot is one of God's mysterious ways.
>
> > Still ssshtard has got to love a guy who says,
> > "I think I have a much higher IQ than you do."
>
> >http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2008/08/the_case_against_joe_...
> > l
>
> > I have to wonder what Obama thinks this guy really
> > brings to the campaign. He's boring, nasty, egotistical,
> > and a loose cannon. *20 years of erratic senate votes
> > and tons of video showing he's a problem in Washington
> > insider politics, not a solution. *Is this change?
>
> > From a republican perspective I'm happy with the choice
> > as I think Biden is not a boost to the campaign for
> > independent or undecided voters. Certainly he does
> > nothing to bring the Hillary renegades into the fold.
>
> > But from the perspective of hoping that Obama is really
> > an agent of change as he claims for the dysfunctional politics
> > that rule Washington, this choice is anything but
> > evidence of that.
>
> > ScottW
>
> I think that Biden will help a great deal, especially in the rust belt. *
> He's huge on family values, especially in comparison to McCain, huge on
> world politics.
>
> Who do you think McCain will choose? *Romney or the Minnesota guy? *I
> don't see the religious right warming up to Romney. *I think that the
> Mormonism hurts him there. *Their beliefs are just so different from
> main stream Christianity. *Then again, there are A LOT of Mormon voters..-

I think Romney, more of a national heavyweight then the Minesota guy
whose name you can't even recall, will be picked. I can't even see
the rightist base being enthused over Pawlenty, though he won't
**** anyone off, either. But he adds nothing.
LOL!

[Clyde Slick]

On 23 Aug, 16:10, Jenn > wrote:
> In article
> >,
>
>
>
>
>
> *ScottW > wrote:
> > On Aug 23, 9:09*am, ScottW > wrote:
> > > On Aug 22, 10:12*pm, George M. Middius >
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > Vice President Joseph Biden. How's that sound, Witless?
>
> > > *All the republican need do is play Biden's pontificating during the
> > > Alito
> > > confirmation hearings. *It clearly revealed what an ass he is.
>
> > A little more on that here.
>
> > "Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr. (D-Del.), in his first 12 minutes of
> > questioning the nominee, managed to get off only one question.
> > Instead, during his 30-minute round of questioning, Biden spoke about
> > his own Irish American roots, his "Grandfather Finnegan," his son's
> > application to Princeton (he attended the University of Pennsylvania
> > instead, Biden said), a speech the senator gave on the Princeton
> > campus, the fact that Biden is "not a Princeton fan," and his views on
> > the eyeglasses of Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.)."
>
> >http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/10/AR200...
> > 0.html
>
> > Why that springs the Middiot is one of God's mysterious ways.
>
> > Still ssshtard has got to love a guy who says,
> > "I think I have a much higher IQ than you do."
>
> >http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2008/08/the_case_against_joe_...
> > l
>
> > I have to wonder what Obama thinks this guy really
> > brings to the campaign. He's boring, nasty, egotistical,
> > and a loose cannon. *20 years of erratic senate votes
> > and tons of video showing he's a problem in Washington
> > insider politics, not a solution. *Is this change?
>
> > From a republican perspective I'm happy with the choice
> > as I think Biden is not a boost to the campaign for
> > independent or undecided voters. Certainly he does
> > nothing to bring the Hillary renegades into the fold.
>
> > But from the perspective of hoping that Obama is really
> > an agent of change as he claims for the dysfunctional politics
> > that rule Washington, this choice is anything but
> > evidence of that.
>
> > ScottW
>
> I think that Biden will help a great deal, especially in the rust belt. *
> He's huge on family values, especially in comparison to McCain, huge on
> world politics.
>
> Who do you think McCain will choose? *Romney or the Minnesota guy? *I
> don't see the religious right warming up to Romney. *I think that the
> Mormonism hurts him there. *Their beliefs are just so different from
> main stream Christianity. *Then again, there are A LOT of Mormon voters..-


If McCain wants to satifsy the fundamentalists, he might as
well pick Pat Robertson or Franklin Graham and be done woth it.

[Jenn[_3_]]

In article
>,
Clyde Slick > wrote:

> On 23 Aug, 16:10, Jenn > wrote:
> > In article
> > >,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > On Aug 23, 9:09*am, ScottW > wrote:
> > > > On Aug 22, 10:12*pm, George M. Middius >
> > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > Vice President Joseph Biden. How's that sound, Witless?
> >
> > > > *All the republican need do is play Biden's pontificating during the
> > > > Alito
> > > > confirmation hearings. *It clearly revealed what an ass he is.
> >
> > > A little more on that here.
> >
> > > "Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr. (D-Del.), in his first 12 minutes of
> > > questioning the nominee, managed to get off only one question.
> > > Instead, during his 30-minute round of questioning, Biden spoke about
> > > his own Irish American roots, his "Grandfather Finnegan," his son's
> > > application to Princeton (he attended the University of Pennsylvania
> > > instead, Biden said), a speech the senator gave on the Princeton
> > > campus, the fact that Biden is "not a Princeton fan," and his views on
> > > the eyeglasses of Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.)."
> >
> > >http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/10/AR200...
> > > 0.html
> >
> > > Why that springs the Middiot is one of God's mysterious ways.
> >
> > > Still ssshtard has got to love a guy who says,
> > > "I think I have a much higher IQ than you do."
> >
> > >http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2008/08/the_case_against_joe_...
> > > l
> >
> > > I have to wonder what Obama thinks this guy really
> > > brings to the campaign. He's boring, nasty, egotistical,
> > > and a loose cannon. *20 years of erratic senate votes
> > > and tons of video showing he's a problem in Washington
> > > insider politics, not a solution. *Is this change?
> >
> > > From a republican perspective I'm happy with the choice
> > > as I think Biden is not a boost to the campaign for
> > > independent or undecided voters. Certainly he does
> > > nothing to bring the Hillary renegades into the fold.
> >
> > > But from the perspective of hoping that Obama is really
> > > an agent of change as he claims for the dysfunctional politics
> > > that rule Washington, this choice is anything but
> > > evidence of that.
> >
> > > ScottW
> >
> > I think that Biden will help a great deal, especially in the rust belt. *
> > He's huge on family values, especially in comparison to McCain, huge on
> > world politics.
> >
> > Who do you think McCain will choose? *Romney or the Minnesota guy? *I
> > don't see the religious right warming up to Romney. *I think that the
> > Mormonism hurts him there. *Their beliefs are just so different from
> > main stream Christianity. *Then again, there are A LOT of Mormon voters.-
>
>
> If McCain wants to satifsy the fundamentalists, he might as
> well pick Pat Robertson or Franklin Graham and be done woth it.

Good point.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Jenn said:

> Who do you think McCain will choose? Romney or the Minnesota guy? I
> don't see the religious right warming up to Romney. I think that the
> Mormonism hurts him there. Their beliefs are just so different from
> main stream Christianity. Then again, there are A LOT of Mormon voters.

When was the last time a Democrat carried Utah? I'll bet it was before
Lincoln.

[MiNe 109]

In article
>,
Clyde Slick > wrote:

> If McCain wants to satifsy the fundamentalists, he might as
> well pick Pat Robertson or Franklin Graham and be done woth it.

Jindal, a hell of a choice.

Stephen

[MiNe 109]

In article >,
George M. Middius > wrote:

> Jenn said:
>
> > Who do you think McCain will choose? Romney or the Minnesota guy? I
> > don't see the religious right warming up to Romney. I think that the
> > Mormonism hurts him there. Their beliefs are just so different from
> > main stream Christianity. Then again, there are A LOT of Mormon voters.
>
> When was the last time a Democrat carried Utah? I'll bet it was before
> Lincoln.

Bet it wasn't. :-)

Stephen

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

MiNe 109 said:

> > > Then again, there are A LOT of Mormon voters.
> >
> > When was the last time a Democrat carried Utah? I'll bet it was before
> > Lincoln.
>
> Bet it wasn't. :-)

LBJ?

[MiNe 109]

In article >,
George M. Middius > wrote:

> MiNe 109 said:
>
> > > > Then again, there are A LOT of Mormon voters.
> > >
> > > When was the last time a Democrat carried Utah? I'll bet it was before
> > > Lincoln.
> >
> > Bet it wasn't. :-)
>
> LBJ?

FDR, HST and LBJ, according to research.

Utah entered the Union in 1896.

Stephen

[Jenn[_3_]]

In article >,
George M. Middius > wrote:

> Jenn said:
>
> > Who do you think McCain will choose? Romney or the Minnesota guy? I
> > don't see the religious right warming up to Romney. I think that the
> > Mormonism hurts him there. Their beliefs are just so different from
> > main stream Christianity. Then again, there are A LOT of Mormon voters.
>
> When was the last time a Democrat carried Utah? I'll bet it was before
> Lincoln.

The Mormon population is increasing in other places besides Utah.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

MiNe 109 said:

> > > > When was the last time a Democrat carried Utah? I'll bet it was before
> > > > Lincoln.
> > >
> > > Bet it wasn't. :-)
> >
> > LBJ?
>
> FDR, HST and LBJ, according to research.

You're industrious today!

> Utah entered the Union in 1896.

My Scottie.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Jenn said:

> > > Then again, there are A LOT of Mormon voters.
> >
> > When was the last time a Democrat carried Utah? I'll bet it was before
> > Lincoln.
>
> The Mormon population is increasing in other places besides Utah.

Really? We have to do something about that. Maybe mandatory drinking laws.

[Clyde Slick]

On 23 Aug, 18:13, MiNe 109 > wrote:
> In article
> >,
> *Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > If McCain wants to satifsy the fundamentalists, he might as
> > well pick Pat Robertson or Franklin Graham and be done woth it.
>
> Jindal, a hell of a choice.
>

explain, please.

[Clyde Slick]

On 23 Aug, 20:41, Jenn > wrote:
> In article >,
> *George M. Middius > wrote:
>
> > Jenn said:
>
> > > Who do you think McCain will choose? *Romney or the Minnesota guy? *I
> > > don't see the religious right warming up to Romney. *I think that the
> > > Mormonism hurts him there. *Their beliefs are just so different from
> > > main stream Christianity. *Then again, there are A LOT of Mormon voters.
>
> > When was the last time a Democrat carried Utah? I'll bet it was before
> > Lincoln.
>
> The Mormon population is increasing in other places besides Utah.

We have got to get them to Planned Parenthood.

[MiNe 109]

In article
>,
Clyde Slick > wrote:

> On 23 Aug, 18:13, MiNe 109 > wrote:
> > In article
> > >,
> > *Clyde Slick > wrote:
> >
> > > If McCain wants to satifsy the fundamentalists, he might as
> > > well pick Pat Robertson or Franklin Graham and be done woth it.
> >
> > Jindal, a hell of a choice.
> >
>
> explain, please.

http://www.time-blog.com/swampland/2008/06/jindals_exorcism.html

<http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/06/bobby_jindals_da
nce_with_the_d.php>

Bobby Jindal, the 36-year old governor of Louisiana, is being taken
seriously by the national press as a candidate on the shortlist to be
John McCain's Vice President. No one doubts that he's a political
prodigy -- his impressive resume includes stints as president of the
state university system, a Congressman and now governor.

But one of Jindal's job titles hasn't gotten much attention -- and it
just might prompt a few questions if his Veep candidacy gains steam:
Exorcist.

As others noted during his 2003 and 2007 gubernatorial campaigns (see
update), in an essay Jindal wrote in 1994 for the New Oxford Review, a
serious right-wing Catholic journal, Jindal narrated a bizarre story of
a personal encounter with a demon, in which he participated in an
exorcism with a group of college friends. And not only did they cast out
the supernatural spirit that had possessed his friend, Jindal wrote that
he believes that their ritual may well have cured her cancer.

--

Stephen

[Clyde Slick]

On 23 Aug, 22:58, MiNe 109 > wrote:
> In article
> >,
> *Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > On 23 Aug, 18:13, MiNe 109 * > wrote:
> > > In article
> > > >,
> > > *Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > > > If McCain wants to satifsy the fundamentalists, he might as
> > > > well pick Pat Robertson or Franklin Graham and be done woth it.
>
> > > Jindal, a hell of a choice.
>
> > explain, please.
>
> http://www.time-blog.com/swampland/2008/06/jindals_exorcism.html
>
> <http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/06/bobby_jindals_da
> nce_with_the_d.php>
>
> Bobby Jindal, the 36-year old governor of Louisiana, is being *taken
> seriously by the national press as a candidate on the shortlist to be
> John McCain's Vice President. No one doubts that he's a political
> prodigy -- his impressive resume includes stints as president of the
> state university system, a Congressman and now governor.
>
> But one of Jindal's job titles hasn't gotten much attention -- and it
> just might prompt a few questions if his Veep candidacy gains steam:
> Exorcist.
>
> As others noted during his 2003 and 2007 gubernatorial campaigns (see
> update), in an essay Jindal wrote in 1994 for the New Oxford Review, a
> serious right-wing Catholic journal, Jindal narrated a bizarre story of
> a personal encounter with a demon, in which he participated in an
> exorcism with a group of college friends. And not only did they cast out
> the supernatural spirit that had possessed his friend, Jindal wrote that
> he believes that their ritual may well have cured her cancer.
>


Unfortunately, this demon found itself a new host. But maybe
he can exorcise it a second time, as he will encounter her
when he becomes President of the Senate.

[Clyde Slick]

On 24 Aug, 09:06, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> On 23 Aug, 22:58, MiNe 109 * > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article
> > >,
> > *Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > > On 23 Aug, 18:13, MiNe 109 * > wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > >,
> > > > *Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > > > > If McCain wants to satifsy the fundamentalists, he might as
> > > > > well pick Pat Robertson or Franklin Graham and be done woth it.
>
> > > > Jindal, a hell of a choice.
>
> > > explain, please.
>
> >http://www.time-blog.com/swampland/2008/06/jindals_exorcism.html
>
> > <http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/06/bobby_jindals_da
> > nce_with_the_d.php>
>
> > Bobby Jindal, the 36-year old governor of Louisiana, is being *taken
> > seriously by the national press as a candidate on the shortlist to be
> > John McCain's Vice President. No one doubts that he's a political
> > prodigy -- his impressive resume includes stints as president of the
> > state university system, a Congressman and now governor.
>
> > But one of Jindal's job titles hasn't gotten much attention -- and it
> > just might prompt a few questions if his Veep candidacy gains steam:
> > Exorcist.
>
> > As others noted during his 2003 and 2007 gubernatorial campaigns (see
> > update), in an essay Jindal wrote in 1994 for the New Oxford Review, a
> > serious right-wing Catholic journal, Jindal narrated a bizarre story of
> > a personal encounter with a demon, in which he participated in an
> > exorcism with a group of college friends. And not only did they cast out
> > the supernatural spirit that had possessed his friend, Jindal wrote that
> > he believes that their ritual may well have cured her cancer.
>
> Unfortunately, this demon found itself a new host. But maybe
> he can exorcise it a second time, as he will encounter her
> when he becomes President of the Senate.-

http://www.cnn.com/US/9606/22/hillary.book/index.html

[MINe109]

On Aug 24, 8:38 am, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> On 24 Aug, 09:06, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 23 Aug, 22:58, MiNe 109 > wrote:
>
> > > In article
> > > >,
> > > Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > > > On 23 Aug, 18:13, MiNe 109 > wrote:
> > > > > In article
> > > > > >,
> > > > > Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > > > > > If McCain wants to satifsy the fundamentalists, he might as
> > > > > > well pick Pat Robertson or Franklin Graham and be done woth it.
>
> > > > > Jindal, a hell of a choice.
>
> > > > explain, please.
>
> > >http://www.time-blog.com/swampland/2008/06/jindals_exorcism.html
>
> > > <http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/06/bobby_jindals_da
> > > nce_with_the_d.php>
>
> > > Bobby Jindal, the 36-year old governor of Louisiana, is being taken
> > > seriously by the national press as a candidate on the shortlist to be
> > > John McCain's Vice President. No one doubts that he's a political
> > > prodigy -- his impressive resume includes stints as president of the
> > > state university system, a Congressman and now governor.
>
> > > But one of Jindal's job titles hasn't gotten much attention -- and it
> > > just might prompt a few questions if his Veep candidacy gains steam:
> > > Exorcist.
>
> > > As others noted during his 2003 and 2007 gubernatorial campaigns (see
> > > update), in an essay Jindal wrote in 1994 for the New Oxford Review, a
> > > serious right-wing Catholic journal, Jindal narrated a bizarre story of
> > > a personal encounter with a demon, in which he participated in an
> > > exorcism with a group of college friends. And not only did they cast out
> > > the supernatural spirit that had possessed his friend, Jindal wrote that
> > > he believes that their ritual may well have cured her cancer.
>
> > Unfortunately, this demon found itself a new host. But maybe
> > he can exorcise it a second time, as he will encounter her
> > when he becomes President of the Senate.-
>
> http://www.cnn.com/US/9606/22/hillary.book/index.html

Yes, life-coach role-playing is very much like exorcism.

Stephen

[Clyde Slick]

On 24 Aug, 14:45, MINe109 > wrote:
> On Aug 24, 8:38 am, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 24 Aug, 09:06, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > > On 23 Aug, 22:58, MiNe 109 * > wrote:
>
> > > > In article
> > > > >,
> > > > *Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > > > > On 23 Aug, 18:13, MiNe 109 * > wrote:
> > > > > > In article
> > > > > > >,
> > > > > > *Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > If McCain wants to satifsy the fundamentalists, he might as
> > > > > > > well pick Pat Robertson or Franklin Graham and be done woth it.

[MiNe 109]

In article
>,
Clyde Slick > wrote:

> On 24 Aug, 14:45, MINe109 > wrote:
> > On Aug 24, 8:38 am, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On 24 Aug, 09:06, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> >
> > > > On 23 Aug, 22:58, MiNe 109 * > wrote:
> >
> > > > > In article
> > > > > >,
> > > > > *Clyde Slick > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > On 23 Aug, 18:13, MiNe 109 * > wrote:
> > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ,
> > > > > > > *Clyde Slick > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > If McCain wants to satifsy the fundamentalists, he might as
> > > > > > > > well pick Pat Robertson or Franklin Graham and be done woth it.
> >
> > > > > > > Jindal, a hell of a choice.
> >
> > > > > > explain, please.
> >
> > > > >http://www.time-blog.com/swampland/2008/06/jindals_exorcism.html
> >
> > > > > <http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/06/bobby_jindals
> > > > > _da
> > > > > nce_with_the_d.php>
> >
> > > > > Bobby Jindal, the 36-year old governor of Louisiana, is being *taken
> > > > > seriously by the national press as a candidate on the shortlist to be
> > > > > John McCain's Vice President. No one doubts that he's a political
> > > > > prodigy -- his impressive resume includes stints as president of the
> > > > > state university system, a Congressman and now governor.
> >
> > > > > But one of Jindal's job titles hasn't gotten much attention -- and it
> > > > > just might prompt a few questions if his Veep candidacy gains steam:
> > > > > Exorcist.
> >
> > > > > As others noted during his 2003 and 2007 gubernatorial campaigns (see
> > > > > update), in an essay Jindal wrote in 1994 for the New Oxford Review,
> > > > > a
> > > > > serious right-wing Catholic journal, Jindal narrated a bizarre story
> > > > > of
> > > > > a personal encounter with a demon, in which he participated in an
> > > > > exorcism with a group of college friends. And not only did they cast
> > > > > out
> > > > > the supernatural spirit that had possessed his friend, Jindal wrote
> > > > > that
> > > > > he believes that their ritual may well have cured her cancer.
> >
> > > > Unfortunately, this demon found itself a new host. But maybe
> > > > he can exorcise it a second time, as he will encounter her
> > > > when he becomes President of the Senate.-
> >
> > >http://www.cnn.com/US/9606/22/hillary.book/index.html
> >
> > Yes, life-coach role-playing is very much like exorcism.
> >
>
> HEHEHEHE!!!
> LOL!!!!!
>
> "Life coach role, playing"
> What was she learning from eleanor, how to eat pussy?

Wow. I hope you amused yourself.

Stephen

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Aug 23, 4:10*pm, Jenn > wrote:

> Who do you think McCain will choose? *Romney or the Minnesota guy? *

I hope Pawlenty.

He'll be easy enough to tear apart.

[Clyde Slick]

On 26 Aug, 01:31, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Aug 23, 4:10*pm, Jenn > wrote:
>
> > Who do you think McCain will choose? *Romney or the Minnesota guy? *
>
> I hope Pawlenty.
>
> He'll be easy enough to tear apart.

Wouldn't you want a competent person, in case McCain won?
That's why I approve of Biden over other alternatives.

[MiNe 109]

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On Aug 26, 12:18*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> > On 26 Aug, 01:31, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > On Aug 23, 4:10*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> >
> > > > Who do you think McCain will choose? *Romney or the Minnesota guy? *
> >
> > > I hope Pawlenty.
> >
> > > He'll be easy enough to tear apart.
> >
> > Wouldn't you want a competent person, in case McCain won?
> > That's why I approve of Biden over other alternatives.
>
> You consider Biden competent? I consider him a self adoring
> pontificating ass. For all his so-called foreign policy experience,
> I'd like someone to show me one thing he's made a good call on.
>
> ScottW

http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Biden_delivering_speech_on_Iraq_1121.html

[Clyde Slick]

On Aug 26, 3:33*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Aug 26, 12:18*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > On 26 Aug, 01:31, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > wrote:
> > > On Aug 23, 4:10*pm, Jenn > wrote:
>
> > > > Who do you think McCain will choose? *Romney or the Minnesota guy? *
>
> > > I hope Pawlenty.
>
> > > He'll be easy enough to tear apart.
>
> > Wouldn't you want a competent person, in case McCain won?
> > That's why I approve of Biden over other alternatives.
>
> You consider Biden competent? *I consider him a self adoring
> pontificating ass. *For all his so-called foreign policy experience,
> I'd like someone to show me one thing he's made a good call on.
>
> ScottW

That depends on how you would categorize the invaasion of Iraq.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Aug 26, 3:18*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> On 26 Aug, 01:31, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > wrote:
> > On Aug 23, 4:10*pm, Jenn > wrote:
>
> > > Who do you think McCain will choose? *Romney or the Minnesota guy? *
>
> > I hope Pawlenty.
>
> > He'll be easy enough to tear apart.
>
> Wouldn't you want a competent person, in case McCain won?

republicans think he is competent.

> That's why I approve of Biden over other alternatives.

I see that 2pid think Biden is an "ass". I'd think that would make
2pid like him. Birds of a feather and all.

[MiNe 109]

In article >,
MiNe 109 > wrote:

> > You consider Biden competent? I consider him a self adoring
> > pontificating ass. For all his so-called foreign policy experience,
> > I'd like someone to show me one thing he's made a good call on.
> >
> > ScottW
>
> http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Biden_delivering_speech_on_Iraq_1121.html

Here's another one:

<http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/the_plank/archive/2008/08/25/the-strange-
silence-on-biden-s-signature-accomplishment.aspx#comments>

Biden's signature accomplishment in domestic policy: the Violence
Against Women's Act. And that's no small thing.

<snip>

VAWA changed all of that. It cracked down on interstate stalking, set
standards for the collection and use of evidence in abuse cases, and set
up a national domestic violence hotline. No less important, VAWA poured
money into local communities for the creation of new prevention and
treatment initiatives. In Detroit, according to Ellis, a VAWA grant
allowed local authorities to hire prosecutors, police officers. and
counselors specifically trained to deal with domestic violence. It also
paid for outreach programs into non-English speaking communities, where
many victims had no idea of their rights--or the resources now available
to them.

--

Stephen

[Clyde Slick]

On 26 Aug, 20:59, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Aug 26, 3:18*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:

>
> > Wouldn't you want a competent person, in case McCain won?
>
> republicans think he is competent.
>
>

what should be important to you is what 'you' think.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Clyde Slick said:

> what should be important to you is what 'you' think.

Your pal Scottie Witlessmongrel doesn't think, at least not in any
recognizable human sense. I have my doubts about you too. For example, would
you ever support a Democratic candidate for President?

[Clyde Slick]

On 26 Aug, 23:03, George M. Middius > wrote:
> Clyde Slick said:
>
> > what *should be important to you is what 'you' think.
>
> Your pal Scottie Witlessmongrel doesn't think, at least not in any
> recognizable human sense. I have my doubts about you too. For example, would
> you ever support a Democratic candidate for President?

Yes, if he/she (LOL!!!--Not Hillary) were a decent person and not
too far to the left, and/or if the Republican was an indecent
person or too far to the right, or was possessed by a Fundamentalist
agenda.
For instance, this year, if it were Huckabee vs Obama, I
would vote for Obama. On McCain vs Obama, I am undecided,
I have misgivings about both. In some ways Obama is better
(temprement,
intelligence, communication) but he is naive about the evils and
perils of the world (i.e., Georgia situation "Both sides must show
restraint")
and secretive about his past.

Of course, I don't believe you would ever vote for a Republican.
Not even Guiliani, one of the least conservative.

[Clyde Slick]

On 26 Aug, 23:59, "ScottW" > wrote:
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>
> ...
> On Aug 26, 3:33 pm, ScottW > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Aug 26, 12:18 pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > > On 26 Aug, 01:31, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > On Aug 23, 4:10 pm, Jenn > wrote:
>
> > > > > Who do you think McCain will choose? Romney or the Minnesota guy?
>
> > > > I hope Pawlenty.
>
> > > > He'll be easy enough to tear apart.
>
> > > Wouldn't you want a competent person, in case McCain won?
> > > That's why I approve of Biden over other alternatives.
>
> > You consider Biden competent? I consider him a self adoring
> > pontificating ass. For all his so-called foreign policy experience,
> > I'd like someone to show me one thing he's made a good call on.
>
> > ScottW
>
> That depends on how you would categorize the invaasion of Iraq.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> He voted for the use of force.
>
> http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_...
>
> ScottW-

that is waht I meant.
some people don't like that

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Aug 26, 10:39*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> On 26 Aug, 20:59, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > wrote:
> > On Aug 26, 3:18*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > > Wouldn't you want a competent person, in case McCain won?
>
> > republicans think he is competent.
>
> what *should be important to you is what 'you' think.

I think the republicans should do whatever they want to. I'm not a
republican. I will not be voting for McCain regardless of who his
running mate is. Therefore what I think about their choice for VP is
not important.

I hope it's Pawlenty. He'll be easy to tear apart.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Aug 27, 12:17*am, Clyde Slick > wrote:

> Not even Guiliani, one of the least conservative.

The republicans have even managed to corrupt the word "conservative".

Guiliani is, perhaps, one of the least *radical*.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Clyde Slick said:

> > Your pal Scottie Witlessmongrel doesn't think, at least not in any
> > recognizable human sense. I have my doubts about you too. For example, would
> > you ever support a Democratic candidate for President?
>
> Yes, if he/she (LOL!!!--Not Hillary) were a decent person and not
> too far to the left,

Let's stop here so you can explain what you mean by that. Recently, you ranted
that Shhhh was very far to the political left, but you were unable to
substantiate that claim with a single example. That led the rest of us to
believe that you are so far to the political right that you can't even see the
center.

If you want to try again, what are your criteria for "too far to the left"?
What puts, say, Obama and Biden in or out of your range of acceptability?

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Shhhh! said:

> > Not even Guiliani, one of the least conservative.
>
> The republicans have even managed to corrupt the word "conservative".

Indeed. I believe this phenomenon might be why the Moron Brigade (hi Scottie!)
are so deeply committed to Dumbya and his gang: They use/misuse well-known
words without regard to their established meanings, thus rendering meaningless
the location of reference points for 'discussions'. Nothing they say means
what you'd expect, and the terms they use take on arbitrary and, uh, "fluid"
meanings.

Scottie loves that muddling of ontology. It makes him feel less inferior, if
only for a moment.

[Clyde Slick]

On 27 Aug, 01:01, George M. Middius > wrote:
> Clyde Slick said:
>

>
> If you want to try again, what are your criteria for "too far to the left"?
> What puts, say, Obama and Biden in or out of your range of acceptability?

I isn't possible to quantify, as it is a qualitative decision.
One has to look at everything as a whole, there are more than twenty
issues I could look at, and on each issue there is a continuum between
the right and the left. There are also factors of character and
temperament to consider.
For me, there is also such a thing as too far to the right.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Clyde Slick said:

> > If you want to try again, what are your criteria for "too far to the left"?
> > What puts, say, Obama and Biden in or out of your range of acceptability?

> I isn't possible to quantify, as it is a qualitative decision.

Oops! You missed the important part of my post.

> > > Yes, if he/she (LOL!!!--Not Hillary) were a decent person and not
> > > too far to the left,

> > Let's stop here so you can explain what you mean by that. Recently, you ranted
> > that Shhhh was very far to the political left, but you were unable to
> > substantiate that claim with a single example. That led the rest of us to
> > believe that you are so far to the political right that you can't even see the
> > center.

Apparently you're still having difficulty 'thinking'. Too bad.

Also: Shut up, Witless.