2pid silenced at last? LOL!

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

"A U.S. military jury gave Osama bin Laden's driver a surprisingly
light sentence on Thursday, making him eligible for release in just
five months despite the prosecutors' request for at least a 30-year
sentence to deter would-be terrorists."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/guantanamo_bin_laden_s_driver

[John Atkinson[_2_]]

On Aug 7, 5:58 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> "A U.S. military jury gave Osama bin Laden's driver a surprisingly
> light sentence on Thursday, making him eligible for release in just
> five months despite the prosecutors' request for at least a 30-year
> sentence to deter would-be terrorists."
>
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/guantanamo_bin_laden_s_driver

Except that the Bush Administration has declared that,
regardless of the verdict and sentencing, they will
insist on keeping the prisoner in jail after he has
served his sentence. So much for "law and order"!

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile

[Harry Lavo]

"John Atkinson" > wrote in message
...
> On Aug 7, 5:58 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> > wrote:
>> "A U.S. military jury gave Osama bin Laden's driver a surprisingly
>> light sentence on Thursday, making him eligible for release in just
>> five months despite the prosecutors' request for at least a 30-year
>> sentence to deter would-be terrorists."
>>
>> http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/guantanamo_bin_laden_s_driver
>
> Except that the Bush Administration has declared that,
> regardless of the verdict and sentencing, they will
> insist on keeping the prisoner in jail after he has
> served his sentence. So much for "law and order"!
>
> John Atkinson
> Editor, Stereophile

It will be interesting to see what happens. If they are stupid enough not
to release him, all hell will break loose. And if they do release him, Rush
Limbaugh will bust a spleen accusing everybody from the President on down of
being traitors.

[Jenn[_3_]]

In article >,
"Harry Lavo" > wrote:

> "John Atkinson" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On Aug 7, 5:58 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> > > wrote:
> >> "A U.S. military jury gave Osama bin Laden's driver a surprisingly
> >> light sentence on Thursday, making him eligible for release in just
> >> five months despite the prosecutors' request for at least a 30-year
> >> sentence to deter would-be terrorists."
> >>
> >> http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/guantanamo_bin_laden_s_driver
> >
> > Except that the Bush Administration has declared that,
> > regardless of the verdict and sentencing, they will
> > insist on keeping the prisoner in jail after he has
> > served his sentence. So much for "law and order"!
> >
> > John Atkinson
> > Editor, Stereophile
>
> It will be interesting to see what happens. If they are stupid enough not
> to release him, all hell will break loose. And if they do release him, Rush
> Limbaugh will bust a spleen accusing everybody from the President on down of
> being traitors.

How long have you hated America?


;-)

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Aug 7, 6:47*pm, John Atkinson > wrote:
> On Aug 7, 5:58 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > wrote:
> > "A U.S. military jury gave Osama bin Laden's driver a surprisingly
> > light sentence on Thursday, making him eligible for release in just
> > five months despite the prosecutors' request for at least a 30-year
> > sentence to deter would-be terrorists."
>
> >http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/guantanamo_bin_laden_s_driver
>
> Except that the Bush Administration has declared that,
> regardless of the verdict and sentencing, they will
> insist on keeping the prisoner in jail after he has
> served his sentence.

Oh, 2pid will like that.

> So much for "law and order"!

2pid isn't much for the rule of law, as we've seen many times.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Shhhh! said:

> > So much for "law and order"!
>
> 2pid isn't much for the rule of law, as we've seen many times.

Scottie lurn'd all about law & oarder from smart folk's like Limbaugh and
Hannity and O-Reilly. Here's what Yapper believes mostly of, first of all:

1. If they weren't guilty, why did the police arrest em?

2. Illegal border-crossers are criminals and we should put em in jail.

3. Taxe's's are 2 high because Scottie works very hard to save California from
bankruptcy.

4. Its ironic that any military veteran coulda voted against Bush.

5. Driving is a right not a privaludge cos its a form of free speech.

6. Liberal's are traitors and we should shoot em.

7. The guvmint has no business interfering in local politics.

8. The Fed's aren't doing they're job because they don't enforce immigration
laws in socal.

9. If you kill an illegal immigrant your a hero.

10. The Feds have no business telling state's whether they can have capital
punishment.



Scottie has thought long and hard about these core beliefs. If you tell him he
can't believe in his beliefs, your a facscsist.

[[email protected]]

On Aug 7, 6:47 pm, John Atkinson > wrote:
> On Aug 7, 5:58 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > wrote:
> > "A U.S. military jury gave Osama bin Laden's driver a surprisingly
> > light sentence on Thursday, making him eligible for release in just
> > five months despite the prosecutors' request for at least a 30-year
> > sentence to deter would-be terrorists."
>
> >http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/guantanamo_bin_laden_s_driver
>
> Except that the Bush Administration has declared that,
> regardless of the verdict and sentencing, they will
> insist on keeping the prisoner in jail after he has
> served his sentence. So much for "law and order"!
>

Bush, admittedly a stupid man, will not be president when his
sentence is up. So who cares what Bush says?

[[email protected]]

On Aug 8, 2:02 pm, George M. Middius > wrote:
> Shhhh! said:
>
> > > So much for "law and order"!
>
> > 2pid isn't much for the rule of law, as we've seen many times.

Middius is? Bull****.

>
> Scottie lurn'd all about law & oarder from smart folk's like Limbaugh and
> Hannity and O-Reilly. Here's what Yapper believes mostly of, first of all:
>
> 1. If they weren't guilty, why did the police arrest em?

Police arrest because they see presumed illegal activity or on a
warrant. They apprehend them, not convict, sentence or house them.
>
> 2. Illegal border-crossers are criminals and we should put em in jail.

They are criminals as you just said. If someone crosses a border and
it is ILLEGAL then they are LAW_BREAKERS, a/k/a CRIMINALS. By
definition. We should deport or jail them as needed.

>
> 3. Taxe's's are 2 high because Scottie works very hard to save California from
> bankruptcy.

Taxes are too high because of high government spending, YET, not
high enough, because of the deficit.
>
> 4. Its ironic that any military veteran coulda voted against Bush.

I know many who have, but the alternatives were at least as bad.

>
> 5. Driving is a right not a privaludge cos its a form of free speech.

I believe it's a right because roads are paid for by general funds
and built with eminent domain. However, like belief in resurrected
carpenters or teen-poon-hound prophets, it's no more than that.

>
> 6. Liberal's are traitors and we should shoot em.

No, just fools.

>
> 7. The guvmint has no business interfering in local politics.

A nonsequitur.
>
> 8. The Fed's aren't doing they're job because they don't enforce immigration
> laws in socal.

Factually true.
>
> 9. If you kill an illegal immigrant your a hero.

I don't think he said that. At any rate immigration violation is not
a capital crime. No one wants them killed, only sent home where they
in fact belong.
>
> 10. The Feds have no business telling state's whether they can have capital
> punishment.

As far as I know that is the case according to the US Constitution.
>
> Scottie has thought long and hard about these core beliefs. If you tell him he
> can't believe in his beliefs, your a facscsist.

If you tell ANYONE he can't believe what he believes you are a fool
on the surface of things. He will believe what he will believe. You
can disapprove, but that's the end of things.