Sony ICD-MX20 - Awful Sound & Dodgy Software

[[email protected]]

Compared to the other Sony IC recorders I have (ICD-MS515 and
ICD-BP150) the ICD-MX20 is a major let down - especially for the
price.

Although ICD-MX20 is very well-built it just cannot make good
recordings. There are lots of phasing artefacts - even in the
highest-quality mode.

For me the supplied software - Digital Voice Editor 3 - would be
functional enough if it could get along okay with the drivers for my
Edirol FA-101 firewire audio interface. But clicking DVE 3's volume
control seems to disable the Edirol drivers meaning that they have to
be reinstalled. So I have removed DVE 3 from the PC and now use Sony's
WMP plug-in to play .msv files on the computer. Then, for converting
..msv files to other formats, I use NCH SWITCH.

http://www.nch.com.au/switch/

I would recommend you test ICD-MX20 in a store before buying it. There
must be other machines out there that can make better recordings for
the same or far less money.

[Rob[_3_]]

wrote:
> Compared to the other Sony IC recorders I have (ICD-MS515 and
> ICD-BP150) the ICD-MX20 is a major let down - especially for the
> price.
>
> Although ICD-MX20 is very well-built it just cannot make good
> recordings. There are lots of phasing artefacts - even in the
> highest-quality mode.
>
> For me the supplied software - Digital Voice Editor 3 - would be
> functional enough if it could get along okay with the drivers for my
> Edirol FA-101 firewire audio interface. But clicking DVE 3's volume
> control seems to disable the Edirol drivers meaning that they have to
> be reinstalled. So I have removed DVE 3 from the PC and now use Sony's
> WMP plug-in to play .msv files on the computer. Then, for converting
> .msv files to other formats, I use NCH SWITCH.
>
> http://www.nch.com.au/switch/
>
> I would recommend you test ICD-MX20 in a store before buying it. There
> must be other machines out there that can make better recordings for
> the same or far less money.

FWIW, I recently went on a training session at work and they recommended
(and supply/use) Edirol SS recorders for field research/podcasts on so
on. We had a play with what I think from memory is the R09HR model. I
found the build pretty uninspiring but the voice recordings were to my
mind superb. Apparently they're holding up well on the reliability front.

On the software front, it was just a simple file transfer interface and
imported to Audacity. We used high bitrate mp3s.

Loosely related, i had a meeting with a PhD student and recommended
trying one of these for her field research. I was (effectively) shouted
down by a colleague who stated SS devices were not reliable and to stick
to cassettes.

Rob