2pid will be all over this one

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

“Take the worst possibility here, which is Senator McCain misspoke,”
Mr. Kyl said. “And that because of the specific words used, what he
said was not entirely accurate. O.K., so what?”

But in a news conference here, in response to separate questions, Mr.
McCain twice denied that he had misspoken, even as he admitted that
the drawdown from the troop escalation had not yet been completed.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24900460

I demand an explanantion.

McCain was clearly and obviously lying. This borders on sedition and
treason.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On May 31, 9:56*am, ScottW > wrote:
> On May 31, 4:16*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > wrote:
> > “Take the worst possibility here, which is Senator McCain misspoke,”
> > Mr. Kyl said. “And that because of the specific words used, what he
> > said was not entirely accurate. O.K., so what?”
>
> > But in a news conference here, in response to separate questions, Mr.
> > McCain twice denied that he had misspoken, even as he admitted that
> > the drawdown from the troop escalation had not yet been completed.
>
> >http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24900460
>
> > I demand an explanantion.
>
> *It was obviously nitpicking.

"Obviously". LoL

"Clearly" in the same sense that Obama "obviously" lied about his
uncle.

Lol

Imbecile.

> > McCain was clearly and obviously lying. This borders on sedition and
> > treason.
>
> *I'm sure IYO, it does. *Funny how that works.

Yet this "outright lie" gets a pass.

Things that make you go "Hmmmm".

LoL

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On May 31, 11:40*am, ScottW > wrote:
> On May 31, 9:26*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> > On May 31, 9:56*am, ScottW > wrote:
>
> > > On May 31, 4:16*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > “Take the worst possibility here, which is Senator McCain misspoke,”
> > > > Mr. Kyl said. “And that because of the specific words used, what he
> > > > said was not entirely accurate. O.K., so what?”
>
> > > > But in a news conference here, in response to separate questions, Mr..
> > > > McCain twice denied that he had misspoken, even as he admitted that
> > > > the drawdown from the troop escalation had not yet been completed.
>
> > > >http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24900460
>
> > > > I demand an explanantion.
>
> > > *It was obviously nitpicking.
>
> > "Obviously". LoL
>
> > "Clearly" in the same sense that Obama "obviously" lied about his
> > uncle.
>
> > Lol
>
> > Imbecile.
>
> > > > McCain was clearly and obviously lying. This borders on sedition and
> > > > treason.
>
> > > *I'm sure IYO, it does. *Funny how that works.
>
> > Yet this "outright lie" gets a pass.
>
> > Things that make you go "Hmmmm".
>
> *more like pffft.

So to you, it is more important for a CinC to know where Auschwitz is
than to know how many troops he has deployed.

That's very 'intelligent' of you, dum-dum.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On May 31, 5:15*pm, "ScottW" > wrote:
> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote in ...
> On May 31, 11:40 am, ScottW > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 31, 9:26 am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > wrote:
> > > On May 31, 9:56 am, ScottW > wrote:
>
> > > > On May 31, 4:16 am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > “Take the worst possibility here, which is Senator McCain misspoke,”
> > > > > Mr. Kyl said. “And that because of the specific words used, what he
> > > > > said was not entirely accurate. O.K., so what?”
>
> > > > > But in a news conference here, in response to separate questions, Mr.
> > > > > McCain twice denied that he had misspoken, even as he admitted that
> > > > > the drawdown from the troop escalation had not yet been completed.
>
> > > > >http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24900460
>
> > > > > I demand an explanantion.
>
> > > > It was obviously nitpicking.
>
> > > "Obviously". LoL
>
> > > "Clearly" in the same sense that Obama "obviously" lied about his
> > > uncle.
>
> > > Lol
>
> > > Imbecile.
>
> > > > > McCain was clearly and obviously lying. This borders on sedition and
> > > > > treason.
>
> > > > I'm sure IYO, it does. Funny how that works.
>
> > > Yet this "outright lie" gets a pass.
>
> > > Things that make you go "Hmmmm".
>
> > more like pffft.
>
> So to you, it is more important for a CinC to know where Auschwitz is
> than to know how many troops he has deployed.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> A couple of points.
>
> Your logic is that if McCain doesn't know
> then Obama must. *That is clearly ridiculous.

Clearly Obama does or he wouldn't have called McCain on it. Duh.

> Second, *nothing I ever said indicates I give these issues
> equal importance. That's you making **** up again.
> In fact, the one time I mentioned it I clearly said Iraq is the far
> more important issue and should not be trivialized.
> What issue does raising Obama's gaffe trivialize?

Brilliant 'logic', 2pid. You *can* raise a huge fuss because somebody
gets something wrong that doesn't matter. You *cannot* raise a fuss
about somebody getting something wrong that does matter.

Absolutely brilliant.

> Obama's vacillating Iraq strategy statements speak volumes while
> McCain's is steadfast and clear.

Even if true. that has nothing to do with McCain not knowing how many
troops are in Iraq, or how many will be in July.

Why are you such a little propaganda machine? Are you on the RNC
payroll? You can never discuss anything without resorting to the party
line.

> Third, The fact that he may not know
> the exact status of brigades in transition while he is a candidate
> is of no great importance and not particularly telling of what he
> will or will not know when/if he is CinC.

But Obama mistanly saying "Auscwitz" instead of "Buchenwald"
"obviously" ;-) told you something about Obama that you felt the need
to let the rest of RAO know.

As I said, brilliant.