Device for digital storage of CDs? [Archive]

Arny Krueger

May 20th 08, 08:20 PM

Arny Krueger

May 20th 08, 08:21 PM

"Soundhaspriority" > wrote in message

> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> ...
>> In article
>> >, "Arny
>> Krueger" > wrote:
> [snip]
>>>
>>> Jenn, you have to remember that not being trust fund
>>> babies, money and performance actually matter to some
>>> people.
>>
>> If you knew my background, you might understand what an
>> asshole you're being. What's your beef with me? I
>> simply added to you answer to the OP.
>
> Jenn, he's been on a victimizing rampage since last
> night. You're just one of several he's gashed.

I love it when usually-agressive people bend over so far backwards to
characterize themselves as victims.

Jenn[_2_]

May 20th 08, 08:25 PM

Arny Krueger

May 20th 08, 08:32 PM

"Jenn" > wrote in message

> In article >,
> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:

>> It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing to be
>> omniscient, and then play the pity card.

> I'm not faulting you for being "omniscient".

I never said you did.

> You took an
> uneducated guess, and you were wrong.

No, I was being a tiny bit sarcastic.

> And I'm not playing the "pity card".

Spare me!

> I'm pointing out what an asshole you're being.

How sweet of you, Jenn.

>>> What's your beef with me?
>>
>> Your lack of character.

> More being an asshole on your part.

No, just reflecting on readily observable facts.

>>> I simply added to you answer to the OP.

>> It was a inappropriate comment because of the rotten
>> price/performance of Macs, particularly as data storage
>> devices.

> No, it's not inappropriate, Arny. It's a fact.

Yes it is a fact that Macs have rotten price/performance as data storage
devices.

>> But its the sort of thing I
>> expect from people who brag about having jillion dollar
>> microphones.

> I don't have "jillion dollar microphones.

You know exactly what I mean, Jenn - but thanks for showing your true colors
by being deceptive about it.

> Another wrong guess on your part.

I'm praying that a modicum of self-awareness somehow enters your psyche,
Jenn. And soon!

Jenn[_2_]

May 20th 08, 08:49 PM

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> > In article >,
> > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
> >> It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing to be
> >> omniscient, and then play the pity card.
>
> > I'm not faulting you for being "omniscient".
>
> I never said you did.

You didn't? How do you know that it's "just like me"?

>
> > You took an
> > uneducated guess, and you were wrong.
>
> No, I was being a tiny bit sarcastic.

You should try being nice to people.

>
> > And I'm not playing the "pity card".
>
> Spare me!

Why spare you from the truth?

>
> > I'm pointing out what an asshole you're being.
>
> How sweet of you, Jenn.

You shouldn't pick fights if you don't want to have one.

>
> >>> What's your beef with me?
> >>
> >> Your lack of character.
>
> > More being an asshole on your part.
>
> No, just reflecting on readily observable facts.

I've asked this many times before and you haven't answered the question:
How, in your opinion, do I show lack of character?

>
>
> >>> I simply added to you answer to the OP.
>
> >> It was a inappropriate comment because of the rotten
> >> price/performance of Macs, particularly as data storage
> >> devices.
>
> > No, it's not inappropriate, Arny. It's a fact.
>
> Yes it is a fact that Macs have rotten price/performance as data storage
> devices.

Maybe he already has a Mac. You don't know his situation. "Delusions
of omnipresence noted."

>
> >> But its the sort of thing I
> >> expect from people who brag about having jillion dollar
> >> microphones.
>
> > I don't have "jillion dollar microphones".
>
> You know exactly what I mean, Jenn - but thanks for showing your true colors
> by being deceptive about it.

What am I being deceptive about? I have four microphones totaling about
$600. Are those "jillion dollar" microphones?

>
> > Another wrong guess on your part.
>
> I'm praying that a modicum of self-awareness somehow enters your psyche,
> Jenn. And soon!

lol Irony meter off the scale.

Harry Lavo

May 20th 08, 09:14 PM

Harry Lavo

May 20th 08, 09:16 PM

"Jenn" > wrote in message
...
> In article >,
> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>>
>> > In article >,
>> > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>> >
>> >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>> >> .
>> >> com
>> >>> In article
>> >>> >, "Arny
>> >>> Krueger" > wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
>> >>>> message
>> >>>>
>> >>>> y.
>> >>>> com
>> >>>>> In article
>> >>>>> >, "Arny
>> >>>>> Krueger" > wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> "SkiFastBadly" > wrote
>> >>>>>> in message
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Yeah, I googled and came up with nothing.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Is there a device onto which I can load my CDS (the
>> >>>>>>> music, not the discs), which will hold the data as
>> >>>>>>> WAV, not mp3, which will act as a virtual CD player,
>> >>>>>>> meaning it will send a signal out to my pre-amp,
>> >>>>>>> which has wireless capability to go out to the
>> >>>>>>> internet to determine what CDs I'm loading, and will
>> >>>>>>> provide an easy UI that allows me to select CDs to
>> >>>>>>> play OR will play random cuts? And which will hold
>> >>>>>>> 500+ CDs?
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Yes, they are called Windows PCs.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Or Mac, of course.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Yes, you use Macs if you want 10% of the compatibility
>> >>>> for twice the price.
>> >>>
>> >>> Whatever, Arny. I'm simply expanding on the information
>> >>> you offered.
>> >>
>> >> Jenn, you have to remember that not being trust fund
>> >> babies, money and performance actually matter to some
>> >> people.
>>
>> > If you knew my background, you might understand what an
>> > asshole you're being.
>>
>> It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing to be omnisicent, and
>> then
>> play the pity card.
>
> I'm not faulting you for being "omnisicent". You took an uneducated
> guess, and you were wrong. And I'm not playing the "pity card". I'm
> pointing out what an asshole you're being.
>
>>
>> > What's your beef with me?
>>
>> Your lack of character.
>
> More being an asshole on your part.
>
>>
>> > I simply added to you answer to the OP.
>>
>> It was a inappropriate comment because of the rotten price/performance of
>> Macs, particularly as data storage devices.
>
> No, it's not inappropriate, Arny. It's a fact.
>
>> But its the sort of thing I
>> expect from people who brag about having jillion dollar microphones.
>
> I don't have "jillion dollar microphones. Another wrong guess on your
> part.

Uh oh! Arny's money envy has taken over again.

Jenn[_2_]

May 20th 08, 09:18 PM

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On May 20, 12:49*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > In article >,
> > *"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > "Jenn" > wrote in message
> > .
> > >com
> > > > In article >,
> > > > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > >> It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing to be
> > > >> omniscient, and then play the pity card.
> >
> > > > I'm not faulting you for being "omniscient".
> >
> > > I never said you did.
> >
> > You didn't? *How do you know that it's "just like me"?
> >
> >
> >
> > > > You took an
> > > > uneducated guess, and you were wrong.
> >
> > > No, I was being a tiny bit sarcastic.
> >
> > You should try being nice to people.
> >
> >
> >
> > > > And I'm not playing the "pity card".
> >
> > > Spare me!
> >
> > Why spare you from the truth?
> >
> >
> >
> > > > *I'm pointing out what an asshole you're being.
> >
> > > How sweet of you, Jenn.
> >
> > You shouldn't pick fights if you don't want to have one.
> >
> >
> >
> > > >>> What's your beef with me?
> >
> > > >> Your lack of character.
> >
> > > > More being an asshole on your part.
> >
> > > No, just reflecting on readily observable facts.
> >
> > I've asked this many times before and you haven't answered the question: *
> > How, in your opinion, do I show lack of character?
>
> People of character don't tolerate miscreants just because they
> aren't the brunt of their attention.
>
> ScottW

Speak to Arny, Scott. Glass houses and all...

George M. Middius[_4_]

May 20th 08, 09:22 PM

Yap! Barkety-yappity-bark-bark-WOOF! YAPYAPYAP!

> they aren't the brunt of their attention.

Fleas geting to you today, Witless? Is the need to gibber dominating
your impulses?

I suggest a foray into Postal Vehicle Chasing. Just think of those
delicious spinning hubcaps, those flapping pant legs, and the rush of
the wind in your whiskers. Get your therapy, Scooter -- you need it bad.

Jenn[_2_]

May 20th 08, 09:24 PM

In article >,
"Harry Lavo" > wrote:

> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
> . ..
> > "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >
> > om
> >> In article >,
> >> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >>
> >>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >>>
> >>> .com
> >>>> In article
> >>>> >, "Arny
> >>>> Krueger" > wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
> >>>>> message
> >>>>>
> >>>>> gy.
> >>>>> com
> >>>>>> In article
> >>>>>> >, "Arny
> >>>>>> Krueger" > wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> "SkiFastBadly" > wrote
> >>>>>>> in message
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Yeah, I googled and came up with nothing.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Is there a device onto which I can load my CDS (the
> >>>>>>>> music, not the discs), which will hold the data as
> >>>>>>>> WAV, not mp3, which will act as a virtual CD player,
> >>>>>>>> meaning it will send a signal out to my pre-amp,
> >>>>>>>> which has wireless capability to go out to the
> >>>>>>>> internet to determine what CDs I'm loading, and will
> >>>>>>>> provide an easy UI that allows me to select CDs to
> >>>>>>>> play OR will play random cuts? And which will hold
> >>>>>>>> 500+ CDs?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Yes, they are called Windows PCs.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Or Mac, of course.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yes, you use Macs if you want 10% of the compatibility
> >>>>> for twice the price.
> >>>>
> >>>> Whatever, Arny. I'm simply expanding on the information
> >>>> you offered.
> >>>
> >>> Jenn, you have to remember that not being trust fund
> >>> babies, money and performance actually matter to some
> >>> people.
> >
> >> If you knew my background, you might understand what an
> >> asshole you're being.
> >
> > It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing to be omnisicent, and then
> > play the pity card.
> >
> >> What's your beef with me?
> >
> > Your lack of character.
> >
> >> I simply added to you answer to the OP.
> >
> > It was a inappropriate comment because of the rotten price/performance of
> > Macs, particularly as data storage devices. But its the sort of thing I
> > expect from people who brag about having jillion dollar microphones.
>
> LOL! That's why they are the mainstay of the photographic world, right
> Arny? Because they are inefficient and have a rotten price/performance
> ratio? LOL! What a maroon!

Not to mention the music world.

Jenn[_2_]

May 20th 08, 09:24 PM

In article >,
George M. Middius > wrote:

> Yap! Barkety-yappity-bark-bark-WOOF! YAPYAPYAP!
>
> > they aren't the brunt of their attention.
>
> Fleas geting to you today, Witless? Is the need to gibber dominating
> your impulses?
>
> I suggest a foray into Postal Vehicle Chasing. Just think of those
> delicious spinning hubcaps, those flapping pant legs, and the rush of
> the wind in your whiskers. Get your therapy, Scooter -- you need it bad.

For Scott: I'm against the throwing of such snot.

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

May 20th 08, 09:40 PM

On May 20, 3:34*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On May 20, 1:24*pm, Jenn > wrote:

> > For Scott: *I'm against the throwing of such snot.
>
> *One must ask, is this the best a person of character can do?

Not at all, 2pid. She could cast aspersions about other people's
military service, like some other "people of character" do here.

LOL!

Arny Krueger

May 20th 08, 09:54 PM

"Jenn" > wrote in message

> In article >,
> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>>
>>> In article
>>> >, "Arny
>>> Krueger" > wrote:
>>
>>>> It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing to be
>>>> omniscient, and then play the pity card.

>>> I'm not faulting you for being "omniscient".
>>
>> I never said you did.

> You didn't?

Restated in a lower grade level of English than before, I said you faulted
me for *not* being omnisicent.

> How do you know that it's "just like me"?

How many years of experience with you???

>>> You took an
>>> uneducated guess, and you were wrong.
>>
>> No, I was being a tiny bit sarcastic.
>
> You should try being nice to people.

I am nice --- to people.

>>> And I'm not playing the "pity card".

>> Spare me!

> Why spare you from the truth?

Sarcasm really flys over your head, doesn't it Jenn?

>>> I'm pointing out what an asshole you're being.
>>
>> How sweet of you, Jenn.
>
> You shouldn't pick fights if you don't want to have one.

As usual, you need to live by some of the words you speak. Anybody with a
brain can see that you were trying to pick a Mac versus PC fight.

>>>>> What's your beef with me?
>>>>
>>>> Your lack of character.
>>
>>> More being an asshole on your part.
>>
>> No, just reflecting on readily observable facts.

> I've asked this many times before and you haven't
> answered the question: How, in your opinion, do I show
> lack of character?

This chain of posts, in particular.

>>>>> I simply added to you answer to the OP.
>>
>>>> It was a inappropriate comment because of the rotten
>>>> price/performance of Macs, particularly as data storage
>>>> devices.
>>
>>> No, it's not inappropriate, Arny. It's a fact.

>> Yes it is a fact that Macs have rotten price/performance
>> as data storage devices.

> Maybe he already has a Mac. You don't know his
> situation. "Delusions of omnipresence noted."

Maybe he also has 2 heads. Only a tiny minority of people in this world
lack ready access to a Windows PC. Its not quite as bad as the tiny
percentage of vinyl bigots, but it isn't that far off.

Of course, I should have known that anybody who has a Mac is so ignorant of
how computers work that he couldn't possibly translate my comments about
Windows PCs into their Mac equivalent. What was I thinking???

>>>> But its the sort of thing I
>>>> expect from people who brag about having jillion dollar
>>>> microphones.
>>
>>> I don't have "jillion dollar microphones".
>>
>> You know exactly what I mean, Jenn - but thanks for
>> showing your true colors by being deceptive about it.
>
> What am I being deceptive about? I have four microphones
> totaling about $600. Are those "jillion dollar"
> microphones?

Again, kicking the language down to a level that people with less than
normal IQs might understand, I was speaking of the hyper-expensive mics that
your school wasted the taxpayer's money on.

>>> Another wrong guess on your part.

>> I'm praying that a modicum of self-awareness somehow
>> enters your psyche, Jenn. And soon!

> lol Irony meter off the scale.

Yup its our perfect little Jenn, again.

How could a perfect little girl like you Jenn ever had a bad relationship
with your father?

Arny Krueger

May 20th 08, 09:57 PM

"Jenn" > wrote in message

> In article
> >,
> ScottW > wrote:
>
>> On May 20, 12:49 pm, Jenn
>> > wrote:
>>> In article
>>> >, "Arny
>>> Krueger" > wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
>>>> message
>>>> .
>>>> com
>>>>> In article
>>>>> >, "Arny
>>>>> Krueger" > wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing to be
>>>>>> omniscient, and then play the pity card.
>>>
>>>>> I'm not faulting you for being "omniscient".
>>>
>>>> I never said you did.
>>>
>>> You didn't? How do you know that it's "just like me"?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> You took an
>>>>> uneducated guess, and you were wrong.
>>>
>>>> No, I was being a tiny bit sarcastic.
>>>
>>> You should try being nice to people.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> And I'm not playing the "pity card".
>>>
>>>> Spare me!
>>>
>>> Why spare you from the truth?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> I'm pointing out what an asshole you're being.
>>>
>>>> How sweet of you, Jenn.
>>>
>>> You shouldn't pick fights if you don't want to have one.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>> What's your beef with me?
>>>
>>>>>> Your lack of character.
>>>
>>>>> More being an asshole on your part.
>>>
>>>> No, just reflecting on readily observable facts.
>>>
>>> I've asked this many times before and you haven't
>>> answered the question: How, in your opinion, do I show
>>> lack of character?
>>
>> People of character don't tolerate miscreants just
>> because they aren't the brunt of their attention.
>>
>> ScottW
>
> Speak to Arny, Scott. Glass houses and all...

Nahh, Scott is just noting your ongoing love affair with the Middiot. You
bring out the gallant knight in white armor in him, Jenn. I sense that he's
warming up to drop a whole Depends full of what he does best on RAO.

Arny Krueger

May 20th 08, 09:58 PM

"Harry Lavo" > wrote in message

> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> ...
>> In article
>> >, "Arny
>> Krueger" > wrote:
>>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>>>
>>>> In article
>>>> >, "Arny
>>>> Krueger" > wrote:
>>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
>>>>> message
>>>>> .
>>>>> com
>>>>>> In article
>>>>>> >, "Arny
>>>>>> Krueger" > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> y.
>>>>>>> com
>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>> >,
>>>>>>>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "SkiFastBadly" >
>>>>>>>>> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, I googled and came up with nothing.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Is there a device onto which I can load my CDS
>>>>>>>>>> (the music, not the discs), which will hold the
>>>>>>>>>> data as WAV, not mp3, which will act as a
>>>>>>>>>> virtual CD player, meaning it will send a signal
>>>>>>>>>> out to my pre-amp, which has wireless capability
>>>>>>>>>> to go out to the internet to determine what CDs
>>>>>>>>>> I'm loading, and will provide an easy UI that
>>>>>>>>>> allows me to select CDs to play OR will play
>>>>>>>>>> random cuts? And which will hold 500+ CDs?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes, they are called Windows PCs.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Or Mac, of course.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, you use Macs if you want 10% of the
>>>>>>> compatibility for twice the price.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Whatever, Arny. I'm simply expanding on the
>>>>>> information you offered.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jenn, you have to remember that not being trust fund
>>>>> babies, money and performance actually matter to some
>>>>> people.
>>>
>>>> If you knew my background, you might understand what an
>>>> asshole you're being.
>>>
>>> It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing to be
>>> omnisicent, and then
>>> play the pity card.
>>
>> I'm not faulting you for being "omnisicent". You took
>> an uneducated guess, and you were wrong. And I'm not
>> playing the "pity card". I'm pointing out what an
>> asshole you're being.
>>>
>>>> What's your beef with me?
>>>
>>> Your lack of character.
>>
>> More being an asshole on your part.
>>
>>>
>>>> I simply added to you answer to the OP.
>>>
>>> It was a inappropriate comment because of the rotten
>>> price/performance of Macs, particularly as data storage
>>> devices.
>>
>> No, it's not inappropriate, Arny. It's a fact.
>>
>>> But its the sort of thing I
>>> expect from people who brag about having jillion dollar
>>> microphones.
>>
>> I don't have "jillion dollar microphones. Another wrong
>> guess on your part.
>
> Uh oh! Arny's money envy has taken over again.

Joke - I have more recording equipment by accident than Harry ever has on
purpose.

Arny Krueger

May 20th 08, 10:03 PM

"Harry Lavo" > wrote in message

> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
> . ..
>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>>
>>> In article
>>> >, "Arny
>>> Krueger" > wrote:
>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
>>>> message
>>>>
>>>>> In article
>>>>> >, "Arny
>>>>> Krueger" > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
>>>>>> message
>>>>>> .
>>>>>> com
>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>> >,
>>>>>>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "SkiFastBadly" >
>>>>>>>> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yeah, I googled and came up with nothing.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Is there a device onto which I can load my CDS
>>>>>>>>> (the music, not the discs), which will hold the
>>>>>>>>> data as WAV, not mp3, which will act as a virtual
>>>>>>>>> CD player, meaning it will send a signal out to
>>>>>>>>> my pre-amp, which has wireless capability to go
>>>>>>>>> out to the internet to determine what CDs I'm
>>>>>>>>> loading, and will provide an easy UI that allows
>>>>>>>>> me to select CDs to play OR will play random
>>>>>>>>> cuts? And which will hold 500+ CDs?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes, they are called Windows PCs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Or Mac, of course.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, you use Macs if you want 10% of the
>>>>>> compatibility for twice the price.
>>>>>
>>>>> Whatever, Arny. I'm simply expanding on the
>>>>> information you offered.
>>>>
>>>> Jenn, you have to remember that not being trust fund
>>>> babies, money and performance actually matter to some
>>>> people.
>>
>>> If you knew my background, you might understand what an
>>> asshole you're being.
>>
>> It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing to be
>> omnisicent, and then play the pity card.
>>
>>> What's your beef with me?
>>
>> Your lack of character.
>>
>>> I simply added to you answer to the OP.
>>
>> It was a inappropriate comment because of the rotten
>> price/performance of Macs, particularly as data storage
>> devices. But its the sort of thing I expect from people
>> who brag about having jillion dollar microphones.
>
> LOL! That's why they are the mainstay of the
> photographic world, right Arny?

What alternative universe is that, Harry?

Ever see the stats for sales of Photoshop for the PC versus Photoshop for
the Mac?

> Because they are
> inefficient and have a rotten price/performance ratio? LOL! What a
> maroon!

Arny Krueger

May 20th 08, 10:04 PM

"Jenn" > wrote in message

> In article >,
> "Harry Lavo" > wrote:
>
>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
>> . ..
>>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>>>
>>> om
>>>> In article
>>>> >, "Arny
>>>> Krueger" > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
>>>>> message
>>>>>
>>>>> .com
>>>>>> In article
>>>>>> >, "Arny
>>>>>> Krueger" > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> gy.
>>>>>>> com
>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>> >,
>>>>>>>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "SkiFastBadly" >
>>>>>>>>> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, I googled and came up with nothing.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Is there a device onto which I can load my CDS
>>>>>>>>>> (the music, not the discs), which will hold the
>>>>>>>>>> data as WAV, not mp3, which will act as a
>>>>>>>>>> virtual CD player, meaning it will send a signal
>>>>>>>>>> out to my pre-amp, which has wireless capability
>>>>>>>>>> to go out to the internet to determine what CDs
>>>>>>>>>> I'm loading, and will provide an easy UI that
>>>>>>>>>> allows me to select CDs to play OR will play
>>>>>>>>>> random cuts? And which will hold 500+ CDs?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes, they are called Windows PCs.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Or Mac, of course.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, you use Macs if you want 10% of the
>>>>>>> compatibility for twice the price.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Whatever, Arny. I'm simply expanding on the
>>>>>> information you offered.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jenn, you have to remember that not being trust fund
>>>>> babies, money and performance actually matter to some
>>>>> people.
>>>
>>>> If you knew my background, you might understand what an
>>>> asshole you're being.
>>>
>>> It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing to be
>>> omnisicent, and then play the pity card.
>>>
>>>> What's your beef with me?
>>>
>>> Your lack of character.
>>>
>>>> I simply added to you answer to the OP.
>>>
>>> It was a inappropriate comment because of the rotten
>>> price/performance of Macs, particularly as data storage
>>> devices. But its the sort of thing I expect from people
>>> who brag about having jillion dollar microphones.
>>
>> LOL! That's why they are the mainstay of the
>> photographic world, right Arny? Because they are
>> inefficient and have a rotten price/performance ratio?
>> LOL! What a maroon!
>
> Not to mention the music world.

That's only because a lot of Mac bigots in education have been splurging
taxpayer and student money on excessively expensive equipment and software.

Arny Krueger

May 20th 08, 10:06 PM

"Signal" > wrote in message

> My goodness Arnold, you don't seem to be quite on edge
> today. Did you trash another clients computer? :-)

No Paul, I'm still quite satisfied with what I did to your computer from
thousands of miles away. ;-)

Arny Krueger

May 20th 08, 10:37 PM

"Soundhaspriority" > wrote in message

> "Signal" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>>
> [snip]
>>
>> My goodness Arnold, you don't seem to be quite on edge
>> today. Did you trash another clients computer? :-)
>>
> He did trash two computers about 4 days ago:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/rec.audio.pro/msg/848824f57409cf10
>
> Particularly amusing is that he apparently did so by very
> naive behavior:
> "Then to add insult to injury, in the middle of finding
> the backout procedure, I infected another computer with a
> nasty spyware/virus infection. I guess God thought I
> needed to be a little more humble. ;-)"
> I was kind to him at the time, but this kind of
> acting-out is extremely inconsiderate of the feelings of
> others.
> Apparently the carrot wins the matchup.

Letsee now Robert, you've posted this twice in two different threads.
Obviously I made your dreary life a little bit brighter today. I'm happy to
be of service.

George M. Middius[_4_]

May 20th 08, 10:47 PM

Jenn said:

> > Yap! Barkety-yappity-bark-bark-WOOF! YAPYAPYAP!
> >
> > > they aren't the brunt of their attention.
> >
> > Fleas geting to you today, Witless? Is the need to gibber dominating
> > your impulses?
> >
> > I suggest a foray into Postal Vehicle Chasing. Just think of those
> > delicious spinning hubcaps, those flapping pant legs, and the rush of
> > the wind in your whiskers. Get your therapy, Scooter -- you need it bad.
>
> For Scott: I'm against the throwing of such snot.

Ignored post.

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

May 20th 08, 11:11 PM

On May 20, 3:37*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On May 20, 1:18*pm, Jenn > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article
> > >,
>
> > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > On May 20, 12:49*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > In article >,
> > > > *"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > > > > "Jenn" > wrote in message
> > > > .
> > > > >com
> > > > > > In article >,
> > > > > > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > > > > >> It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing to be
> > > > > >> omniscient, and then play the pity card.
>
> > > > > > I'm not faulting you for being "omniscient".
>
> > > > > I never said you did.
>
> > > > You didn't? *How do you know that it's "just like me"?
>
> > > > > > You took an
> > > > > > uneducated guess, and you were wrong.
>
> > > > > No, I was being a tiny bit sarcastic.
>
> > > > You should try being nice to people.
>
> > > > > > And I'm not playing the "pity card".
>
> > > > > Spare me!
>
> > > > Why spare you from the truth?
>
> > > > > > *I'm pointing out what an asshole you're being.
>
> > > > > How sweet of you, Jenn.
>
> > > > You shouldn't pick fights if you don't want to have one.
>
> > > > > >>> What's your beef with me?
>
> > > > > >> Your lack of character.
>
> > > > > > More being an asshole on your part.
>
> > > > > No, just reflecting on readily observable facts.
>
> > > > I've asked this many times before and you haven't answered the question: *
> > > > How, in your opinion, do I show lack of character?
>
> > > People of character don't tolerate miscreants just because they
> > > aren't the brunt of their attention.
>
> > > ScottW
>
> > Speak to Arny, Scott. *Glass houses and all...
>
> On the scale of snot, Arny is barely a buger compared to the
> never ending stream that is Middiot/****R.

Do I snot on your audio-related posts, 2pid?

No.

Therefore your unintelligent justification for GOIA is inappropriate.
And stupid. LOL!

Jenn[_2_]

May 20th 08, 11:42 PM

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> > In article >,
> > "Harry Lavo" > wrote:
> >
> >> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
> >> . ..
> >>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >>>
> >>> .c
> >>> om
> >>>> In article
> >>>> >, "Arny
> >>>> Krueger" > wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
> >>>>> message
> >>>>>
> >>>>> gy
> >>>>> .com
> >>>>>> In article
> >>>>>> >, "Arny
> >>>>>> Krueger" > wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
> >>>>>>> message
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> di
> >>>>>>> gy.
> >>>>>>> com
> >>>>>>>> In article
> >>>>>>>> >,
> >>>>>>>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> "SkiFastBadly" >
> >>>>>>>>> wrote in message
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Yeah, I googled and came up with nothing.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Is there a device onto which I can load my CDS
> >>>>>>>>>> (the music, not the discs), which will hold the
> >>>>>>>>>> data as WAV, not mp3, which will act as a
> >>>>>>>>>> virtual CD player, meaning it will send a signal
> >>>>>>>>>> out to my pre-amp, which has wireless capability
> >>>>>>>>>> to go out to the internet to determine what CDs
> >>>>>>>>>> I'm loading, and will provide an easy UI that
> >>>>>>>>>> allows me to select CDs to play OR will play
> >>>>>>>>>> random cuts? And which will hold 500+ CDs?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Yes, they are called Windows PCs.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Or Mac, of course.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Yes, you use Macs if you want 10% of the
> >>>>>>> compatibility for twice the price.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Whatever, Arny. I'm simply expanding on the
> >>>>>> information you offered.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Jenn, you have to remember that not being trust fund
> >>>>> babies, money and performance actually matter to some
> >>>>> people.
> >>>
> >>>> If you knew my background, you might understand what an
> >>>> asshole you're being.
> >>>
> >>> It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing to be
> >>> omnisicent, and then play the pity card.
> >>>
> >>>> What's your beef with me?
> >>>
> >>> Your lack of character.
> >>>
> >>>> I simply added to you answer to the OP.
> >>>
> >>> It was a inappropriate comment because of the rotten
> >>> price/performance of Macs, particularly as data storage
> >>> devices. But its the sort of thing I expect from people
> >>> who brag about having jillion dollar microphones.
> >>
> >> LOL! That's why they are the mainstay of the
> >> photographic world, right Arny? Because they are
> >> inefficient and have a rotten price/performance ratio?
> >> LOL! What a maroon!
> >
> > Not to mention the music world.
>
> That's only because a lot of Mac bigots in education have been splurging
> taxpayer and student money on excessively expensive equipment and software.

I wasn't even speaking about the education market, but now that you
mention it...

Jenn[_2_]

May 20th 08, 11:43 PM

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> > In article
> > >,
> > ScottW > wrote:
> >
> >> On May 20, 12:49 pm, Jenn
> >> > wrote:
> >>> In article
> >>> >, "Arny
> >>> Krueger" > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
> >>>> message
> >>>>
> >>>> y.
> >>>> com
> >>>>> In article
> >>>>> >, "Arny
> >>>>> Krueger" > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>>> It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing to be
> >>>>>> omniscient, and then play the pity card.
> >>>
> >>>>> I'm not faulting you for being "omniscient".
> >>>
> >>>> I never said you did.
> >>>
> >>> You didn't? How do you know that it's "just like me"?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>> You took an
> >>>>> uneducated guess, and you were wrong.
> >>>
> >>>> No, I was being a tiny bit sarcastic.
> >>>
> >>> You should try being nice to people.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>> And I'm not playing the "pity card".
> >>>
> >>>> Spare me!
> >>>
> >>> Why spare you from the truth?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>> I'm pointing out what an asshole you're being.
> >>>
> >>>> How sweet of you, Jenn.
> >>>
> >>> You shouldn't pick fights if you don't want to have one.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>> What's your beef with me?
> >>>
> >>>>>> Your lack of character.
> >>>
> >>>>> More being an asshole on your part.
> >>>
> >>>> No, just reflecting on readily observable facts.
> >>>
> >>> I've asked this many times before and you haven't
> >>> answered the question: How, in your opinion, do I show
> >>> lack of character?
> >>
> >> People of character don't tolerate miscreants just
> >> because they aren't the brunt of their attention.
> >>
> >> ScottW
> >
> > Speak to Arny, Scott. Glass houses and all...
>
> Nahh, Scott is just noting your ongoing love affair with the Middiot.

You mean the guy that I basically never post to?

George M. Middius[_4_]

May 20th 08, 11:47 PM

Poor, pitiful Scottie.

> > Do I snot on your audio-related posts, 2pid?
>
> Lol...what post of mine DON'T you snot on?

Are you complaining, Woofies?

George M. Middius[_4_]

May 20th 08, 11:51 PM

Jenn said:

> > >> LOL! That's why they are the mainstay of the
> > >> photographic world, right Arny? Because they are
> > >> inefficient and have a rotten price/performance ratio?
> > >> LOL! What a maroon!
> > >
> > > Not to mention the music world.
> >
> > That's only because a lot of Mac bigots in education have been splurging
> > taxpayer and student money on excessively expensive equipment and software.
>
> I wasn't even speaking about the education market, but now that you
> mention it...

Is it time to mention the graphics world? How about animation?

Apple's latest slogan is "the computer for the rest of us". That's not
empty adspeak. Outside of the corporate world and the custom SW arena,
Macs dominate professional desktops. Not that the Krooborg could be
expected to have any knowledge of that. It's enough Mr. **** is able to
scratch out a few bucks every week to fund his addictions to soundcards
and kiddie porn.

George M. Middius[_4_]

May 20th 08, 11:52 PM

Jenn said:

> > Nahh, Scott is just noting your ongoing love affair with the Middiot.
>
> You mean the guy that I basically never post to?

Arnii is so terrified of me that he assumes everybody else's thoughts
are dominated by fear of my next post just as his are.

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

May 20th 08, 11:54 PM

On May 20, 5:34*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On May 20, 3:11*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> > On May 20, 3:37*pm, ScottW > wrote:
>
> > > On May 20, 1:18*pm, Jenn > wrote:
>
> > > > In article
> > > > >,
>
> > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > On May 20, 12:49*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > > > In article >,
> > > > > > *"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > "Jenn" > wrote in message
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > >com
> > > > > > > > In article >,
> > > > > > > > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > >> It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing to be
> > > > > > > >> omniscient, and then play the pity card.
>
> > > > > > > > I'm not faulting you for being "omniscient".
>
> > > > > > > I never said you did.
>
> > > > > > You didn't? *How do you know that it's "just like me"?
>
> > > > > > > > You took an
> > > > > > > > uneducated guess, and you were wrong.
>
> > > > > > > No, I was being a tiny bit sarcastic.
>
> > > > > > You should try being nice to people.
>
> > > > > > > > And I'm not playing the "pity card".
>
> > > > > > > Spare me!
>
> > > > > > Why spare you from the truth?
>
> > > > > > > > *I'm pointing out what an asshole you're being.
>
> > > > > > > How sweet of you, Jenn.
>
> > > > > > You shouldn't pick fights if you don't want to have one.
>
> > > > > > > >>> What's your beef with me?
>
> > > > > > > >> Your lack of character.
>
> > > > > > > > More being an asshole on your part.
>
> > > > > > > No, just reflecting on readily observable facts.
>
> > > > > > I've asked this many times before and you haven't answered the question: *
> > > > > > How, in your opinion, do I show lack of character?
>
> > > > > People of character don't tolerate miscreants just because they
> > > > > aren't the brunt of their attention.
>
> > > > > ScottW
>
> > > > Speak to Arny, Scott. *Glass houses and all...
>
> > > On the scale of snot, Arny is barely a buger compared to the
> > > never ending stream that is Middiot/****R.
>
> > Do I snot on your audio-related posts, 2pid?
>
> Lol...what post of mine DON'T you snot on?

Lol...I didn't say a word about your recent DAC geekfest, 2pid. That
was audio-related. You only get put in your place for all of your
other stupidity. If you'll recall, 2pid it was *you* who "snotted" on
my on-topic reply to your Orion post. Lol.

Now go back to your spec sheets. I think they're in the kennel.

Lol

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

May 20th 08, 11:55 PM

On May 20, 5:47*pm, George M. Middius >
wrote:
> Poor, pitiful Scottie.
>
> > > Do I snot on your audio-related posts, 2pid?
>
> > Lol...what post of mine DON'T you snot on?
>
> Are you complaining, Woofies?

2pid has no friends except us, George. His family doesn't even like
him.

Jenn[_2_]

May 20th 08, 11:56 PM

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> > In article >,
> > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >> .
> >> com
> >>> In article
> >>> >, "Arny
> >>> Krueger" > wrote:
> >>
> >>>> It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing to be
> >>>> omniscient, and then play the pity card.
>
> >>> I'm not faulting you for being "omniscient".
> >>
> >> I never said you did.
>
> > You didn't?
>
> Restated in a lower grade level of English than before, I said you faulted
> me for *not* being omnisicent.

Sorry, I left out "not". Your point remains the same: nothing.

>
> > How do you know that it's "just like me"?
>
> How many years of experience with you???

Too many. Your point remains the same.

>
> >>> You took an
> >>> uneducated guess, and you were wrong.
> >>
> >> No, I was being a tiny bit sarcastic.
> >
> > You should try being nice to people.
>
> I am nice --- to people.

Suuuurrre.

>
> >>> And I'm not playing the "pity card".
>
> >> Spare me!
>
> > Why spare you from the truth?
>
> Sarcasm really flys over your head, doesn't it Jenn?

The truth flies over yours, Arny. An option for the OP was a Mac. All
I did was point that out.

>
> >>> I'm pointing out what an asshole you're being.
> >>
> >> How sweet of you, Jenn.
> >
> > You shouldn't pick fights if you don't want to have one.
>
> As usual, you need to live by some of the words you speak. Anybody with a
> brain can see that you were trying to pick a Mac versus PC fight.

lol Not at all. I was just pointing out an option to the OP. Your
skin is VERY thin today, Arny.

>
> >>>>> What's your beef with me?
> >>>>
> >>>> Your lack of character.
> >>
> >>> More being an asshole on your part.
> >>
> >> No, just reflecting on readily observable facts.
>
> > I've asked this many times before and you haven't
> > answered the question: How, in your opinion, do I show
> > lack of character?
>
> This chain of posts, in particular.

That doesn't answer the question. You can't answer the question, so you
never will.

>
> >>>>> I simply added to you answer to the OP.
> >>
> >>>> It was a inappropriate comment because of the rotten
> >>>> price/performance of Macs, particularly as data storage
> >>>> devices.
> >>
> >>> No, it's not inappropriate, Arny. It's a fact.
>
> >> Yes it is a fact that Macs have rotten price/performance
> >> as data storage devices.
>
> > Maybe he already has a Mac. You don't know his
> > situation. "Delusions of omnipresence noted."
>
> Maybe he also has 2 heads. Only a tiny minority of people in this world
> lack ready access to a Windows PC. Its not quite as bad as the tiny
> percentage of vinyl bigots, but it isn't that far off.

OK Arny, I give up. I should have remembered that your perfect answers
to questions are never to be clarified or added to. You're right.

>
> Of course, I should have known that anybody who has a Mac is so ignorant of
> how computers work that he couldn't possibly translate my comments about
> Windows PCs into their Mac equivalent. What was I thinking???

You weren't thinking. You were trying to pick a fight, and I stepped
into it. My bad.

>
> >>>> But its the sort of thing I
> >>>> expect from people who brag about having jillion dollar
> >>>> microphones.
> >>
> >>> I don't have "jillion dollar microphones".
> >>
> >> You know exactly what I mean, Jenn - but thanks for
> >> showing your true colors by being deceptive about it.
> >
> > What am I being deceptive about? I have four microphones
> > totaling about $600. Are those "jillion dollar"
> > microphones?
>
> Again, kicking the language down to a level that people with less than
> normal IQs might understand,

Asshole.

> I was speaking of the hyper-expensive mics that
> your school wasted the taxpayer's money on.

I don't "have" those microphones, Arny. I've SEEN them once; is that
what you meant?

>
> >>> Another wrong guess on your part.
>
> >> I'm praying that a modicum of self-awareness somehow
> >> enters your psyche, Jenn. And soon!
>
> > lol Irony meter off the scale.
>
> Yup its our perfect little Jenn, again.

Again, another jerky straw-man statement. I never said that I was
perfect.

>
> How could a perfect little girl like you Jenn ever had a bad relationship
> with your father?

WTH? You are WAY off the sanity scale today, Arny. I hope that
whatever is bothering you gets worked out.

Jenn[_2_]

May 20th 08, 11:57 PM

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On May 20, 1:18*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > In article
> > >,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > On May 20, 12:49*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > In article >,
> > > > *"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > > > "Jenn" > wrote in message
> > > >
> > > > >igy.
> > > > >com
> > > > > > In article >,
> > > > > > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > > > >> It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing to be
> > > > > >> omniscient, and then play the pity card.
> >
> > > > > > I'm not faulting you for being "omniscient".
> >
> > > > > I never said you did.
> >
> > > > You didn't? *How do you know that it's "just like me"?
> >
> > > > > > You took an
> > > > > > uneducated guess, and you were wrong.
> >
> > > > > No, I was being a tiny bit sarcastic.
> >
> > > > You should try being nice to people.
> >
> > > > > > And I'm not playing the "pity card".
> >
> > > > > Spare me!
> >
> > > > Why spare you from the truth?
> >
> > > > > > *I'm pointing out what an asshole you're being.
> >
> > > > > How sweet of you, Jenn.
> >
> > > > You shouldn't pick fights if you don't want to have one.
> >
> > > > > >>> What's your beef with me?
> >
> > > > > >> Your lack of character.
> >
> > > > > > More being an asshole on your part.
> >
> > > > > No, just reflecting on readily observable facts.
> >
> > > > I've asked this many times before and you haven't answered the
> > > > question: *
> > > > How, in your opinion, do I show lack of character?
> >
> > > People of character don't tolerate miscreants just because they
> > > aren't the brunt of their attention.
> >
> > > ScottW
> >
> > Speak to Arny, Scott. *Glass houses and all...
>
> On the scale of snot, Arny is barely a buger compared to the
> never ending stream that is Middiot/****R.
>
>
> ScottW

You give as well as you get with them. It's between you guys. What is
between Arny and me is just that. The difference is I don't expect you
to comment on Arny when it doesn't involve you.

Harry Lavo

May 21st 08, 05:34 AM

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
. ..
> "Harry Lavo" > wrote in message
>
>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
>> . ..
>
>>> That's only because a lot of Mac bigots in education
>>> have been splurging taxpayer and student money on
>>> excessively expensive equipment and software.
>
>> Seem to me if that argument were valid, Arny, the MAC
>> would be the word processor and spread sheet machine of
>> choice.
>
> Please explain the logical connection between what I said and what you
> said, Harry.
>

I guess your brain went to sleep early tonight Arny. Tired of fighting off
your legions of obsessed admirers today?

Here....I'll give you the roadmap:

You: education using MACs = foolish musicians/engineers spending money on
MACs to record music
But by implication then: education using MACs = thousands upon thousands
of worker-bees using word processing and spreadsheeting on MACx in the
office.

If MACs in schools wre the source of musicians using MACs, Arny, why is it
not also the source of worker-bees using MACs in our offices.
Answer: neither statement is true. There is no logical consistency in your
inference that MACs in schools equals MACs in the studios.

Furthermore, the real reason is not obscure. The MAC was a machine produced
by a company that forsaw the merging of computer and the arts, and made
machines that fostered music, photography, graphics use, and accordingly
fostered the software to do it.

Does the stupidity of your arguments stand out clearly enough now for your
brain to absorb, Arny?

Good! Now go to bed.

Harry Lavo

May 21st 08, 05:38 AM

"ScottW" > wrote in message
...
On May 20, 6:59 pm, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Harry Lavo" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
> . ..
> >> "Harry Lavo" > wrote in message
>
> >>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
> . ..
> >>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
> >>>> message
>
> >>>>> In article
> >>>>> >, "Arny
> >>>>> Krueger" > wrote:
> >>>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
> >>>>>> message
>
> >>>>>>> In article
> >>>>>>> >,
> >>>>>>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
> >>>>>>>> message
> .
> >>>>>>>> com
> >>>>>>>>> In article
> >>>>>>>>> >,
> >>>>>>>>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>> "SkiFastBadly" >
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote in message
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, I googled and came up with nothing.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Is there a device onto which I can load my CDS
> >>>>>>>>>>> (the music, not the discs), which will hold the
> >>>>>>>>>>> data as WAV, not mp3, which will act as a
> >>>>>>>>>>> virtual CD player, meaning it will send a
> >>>>>>>>>>> signal out to my pre-amp, which has wireless
> >>>>>>>>>>> capability to go out to the internet to
> >>>>>>>>>>> determine what CDs I'm loading, and will
> >>>>>>>>>>> provide an easy UI that allows me to select CDs
> >>>>>>>>>>> to play OR will play random cuts? And which
> >>>>>>>>>>> will hold 500+ CDs?
>
> >>>>>>>>>> Yes, they are called Windows PCs.
>
> >>>>>>>>> Or Mac, of course.
>
> >>>>>>>> Yes, you use Macs if you want 10% of the
> >>>>>>>> compatibility for twice the price.
>
> >>>>>>> Whatever, Arny. I'm simply expanding on the
> >>>>>>> information you offered.
>
> >>>>>> Jenn, you have to remember that not being trust fund
> >>>>>> babies, money and performance actually matter to some
> >>>>>> people.
>
> >>>>> If you knew my background, you might understand what
> >>>>> an asshole you're being.
>
> >>>> It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing to be
> >>>> omnisicent, and then play the pity card.
>
> >>>>> What's your beef with me?
>
> >>>> Your lack of character.
>
> >>>>> I simply added to you answer to the OP.
>
> >>>> It was a inappropriate comment because of the rotten
> >>>> price/performance of Macs, particularly as data storage
> >>>> devices. But its the sort of thing I expect from people
> >>>> who brag about having jillion dollar microphones.
>
> >>> LOL! That's why they are the mainstay of the
> >>> photographic world, right Arny?
>
> >> What alternative universe is that, Harry?
>
> >> Ever see the stats for sales of Photoshop for the PC
> >> versus Photoshop for the Mac?
>
> > Relative to market share, the MAC wins.
>
> Prove it Harry. Provide a URL supporting this claim or admit that you're
> making it up as you go along.

Looks to me like Adobe is turning their back on Apple.

http://www.tuaw.com/2008/04/03/apple-adobe-and-64-bit-photoshop/

Yeah they could screw it up yet, Scott, but that says nothing about where
they are as of today in terms of an user base.

Jenn[_2_]

May 21st 08, 07:01 AM

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On May 20, 3:43*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > In article >,
> > *"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > "Jenn" > wrote in message
> > .
> > >com
> > > > In article
> > > > >,
> > > > ScottW > wrote:
> >
> > > >> On May 20, 12:49 pm, Jenn
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >>> In article
> > > >>> >, "Arny
> > > >>> Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > >>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
> > > >>>> message
> > >
> > > >>>>dig
> > > >>>> y.
> > > >>>> com
> > > >>>>> In article
> > > >>>>> >, "Arny
> > > >>>>> Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > >>>>>> It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing to be
> > > >>>>>> omniscient, and then play the pity card.
> >
> > > >>>>> I'm not faulting you for being "omniscient".
> >
> > > >>>> I never said you did.
> >
> > > >>> You didn't? How do you know that it's "just like me"?
> >
> > > >>>>> You took an
> > > >>>>> uneducated guess, and you were wrong.
> >
> > > >>>> No, I was being a tiny bit sarcastic.
> >
> > > >>> You should try being nice to people.
> >
> > > >>>>> And I'm not playing the "pity card".
> >
> > > >>>> Spare me!
> >
> > > >>> Why spare you from the truth?
> >
> > > >>>>> I'm pointing out what an asshole you're being.
> >
> > > >>>> How sweet of you, Jenn.
> >
> > > >>> You shouldn't pick fights if you don't want to have one.
> >
> > > >>>>>>> What's your beef with me?
> >
> > > >>>>>> Your lack of character.
> >
> > > >>>>> More being an asshole on your part.
> >
> > > >>>> No, just reflecting on readily observable facts.
> >
> > > >>> I've asked this many times before and you haven't
> > > >>> answered the question: How, in your opinion, do I show
> > > >>> lack of character?
> >
> > > >> People of character don't tolerate miscreants just
> > > >> because they aren't the brunt of their attention.
> >
> > > >> ScottW
> >
> > > > Speak to Arny, Scott. *Glass houses and all...
> >
> > > Nahh, Scott is just noting your ongoing love affair with the Middiot.
> >
> > You mean the guy that I basically never post to?
>
> Yeah, the guy you're afraid to post to, that one.
>
> ScottW

Are you afraid to post to Arny?

Jenn[_2_]

May 21st 08, 07:02 AM

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On May 20, 4:41*pm, George M. Middius >
> wrote:
> > Shhhh! said:
> >
> > > Now please don't be a hypocrite with no morals or integrity and say
> > > that this isn't 100% logical. That would obviously be absurd.
> >
> > I've heard the Bible is full of "absurd" stuff. What does Yapper think
> > of that, I wonder?
>
> Obviously the christians here don't have the character to defend
> their religion.
>
> ScottW

Some Christians believe that the Bible DOES contain absurd stuff.

Jenn[_2_]

May 21st 08, 07:03 AM

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On May 20, 3:57*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > In article
> > >,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > On May 20, 1:18*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > >,
> >
> > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > On May 20, 12:49*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > > > In article >,
> > > > > > *"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > "Jenn" > wrote in message
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > >prod
> > > > > > >igy.
> > > > > > >com
> > > > > > > > In article >,
> > > > > > > > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > >> It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing to be
> > > > > > > >> omniscient, and then play the pity card.
> >
> > > > > > > > I'm not faulting you for being "omniscient".
> >
> > > > > > > I never said you did.
> >
> > > > > > You didn't? *How do you know that it's "just like me"?
> >
> > > > > > > > You took an
> > > > > > > > uneducated guess, and you were wrong.
> >
> > > > > > > No, I was being a tiny bit sarcastic.
> >
> > > > > > You should try being nice to people.
> >
> > > > > > > > And I'm not playing the "pity card".
> >
> > > > > > > Spare me!
> >
> > > > > > Why spare you from the truth?
> >
> > > > > > > > *I'm pointing out what an asshole you're being.
> >
> > > > > > > How sweet of you, Jenn.
> >
> > > > > > You shouldn't pick fights if you don't want to have one.
> >
> > > > > > > >>> What's your beef with me?
> >
> > > > > > > >> Your lack of character.
> >
> > > > > > > > More being an asshole on your part.
> >
> > > > > > > No, just reflecting on readily observable facts.
> >
> > > > > > I've asked this many times before and you haven't answered the
> > > > > > question: *
> > > > > > How, in your opinion, do I show lack of character?
> >
> > > > > People of character don't tolerate miscreants just because they
> > > > > aren't the brunt of their attention.
> >
> > > > > ScottW
> >
> > > > Speak to Arny, Scott. *Glass houses and all...
> >
> > > On the scale of snot, Arny is barely a buger compared to the
> > > never ending stream that is Middiot/****R.
> >
> > > ScottW
> >
> > You give as well as you get with them. *It's between you guys.
>
> You smear guys everywhere giving those social misfits
> such a title.
>
> But this everyone for themselves mentality is hardly a
> sign of character.
>
> ScottW

Ok. I expect you to now take on Arny on my behalf. Then there is the
whole "two Bobs" thing. Engage!

Jenn[_2_]

May 21st 08, 07:04 AM

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> > In article >,
> > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >> .
> >> com
> >>> In article
> >>> >,
> >>> ScottW > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On May 20, 12:49 pm, Jenn
> >>>> > wrote:
> >>>>> In article
> >>>>> >, "Arny
> >>>>> Krueger" > wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
> >>>>>> message
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ig
> >>>>>> y.
> >>>>>> com
> >>>>>>> In article
> >>>>>>> >,
> >>>>>>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>> It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing to
> >>>>>>>> be omniscient, and then play the pity card.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> I'm not faulting you for being "omniscient".
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I never said you did.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You didn't? How do you know that it's "just like me"?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> You took an
> >>>>>>> uneducated guess, and you were wrong.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> No, I was being a tiny bit sarcastic.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You should try being nice to people.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> And I'm not playing the "pity card".
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Spare me!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Why spare you from the truth?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> I'm pointing out what an asshole you're being.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> How sweet of you, Jenn.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You shouldn't pick fights if you don't want to have
> >>>>> one.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> What's your beef with me?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Your lack of character.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> More being an asshole on your part.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> No, just reflecting on readily observable facts.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I've asked this many times before and you haven't
> >>>>> answered the question: How, in your opinion, do I show
> >>>>> lack of character?
> >>>>
> >>>> People of character don't tolerate miscreants just
> >>>> because they aren't the brunt of their attention.
> >>>>
> >>>> ScottW
> >>>
> >>> Speak to Arny, Scott. Glass houses and all...
> >>
> >> Nahh, Scott is just noting your ongoing love affair with
> >> the Middiot.
> >
> > You mean the guy that I basically never post to?
>
> I don't know about that Jenn, but you surely hold him up to a far lower
> standard than your usual whipping boys, such as mysefl and Scott.

Wow, talk about your "pity party"! lol

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

May 21st 08, 08:31 AM

On May 20, 9:48*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On May 20, 5:36*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> > On May 20, 3:56*pm, ScottW > wrote:
>
> > > On May 20, 1:40*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > On May 20, 3:34*pm, ScottW > wrote:
>
> > > > > On May 20, 1:24*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > > > For Scott: *I'm against the throwing of such snot.
>
> > > > > *One must ask, is this the best a person of character can do?
>
> > > > Not at all, 2pid. She could cast aspersions about other people's
> > > > military service, like some other "people of character" do here.
>
> > > I don't need to cast aspersions about your service.
> > > You did that bragging about discarding it as an act of protest
> > > yourself.
>
> > Discard what, 2pid? I didn't throw anything away. One of us has a
> > "Major, Retired, U.S. Army" ID card. One of us does not. ;-)
>
> *And one of us bragged that their "retirement" was an act of protest.

Bull****.

> *A despicable use of military service and wholly inappropriate.

Not so, dim one. Look at what you are advocating: leading soldiers in
a hostile-fire zone without the expertise in the area one would be
leading in, and without a belief that what was going on was right.

As I said, you are a worthless, thoughtless piece of ****. In a
paraphrase of what gets said to me quite often, "Thank you for not
serving". You're a disaster.

> *It's just more of your starship trooper BS.

Not at all, 2pid. It's the truth: you couldn't be bothered to devote
one nanosecond to what you're wailing about. Ditto politics. Weep weep
weep. wail wail wail. Whine whine whine. Bark bark bark. Yap yap yap.

> If you earned any respect for your service you just as quickly
> lost it forgetting what you serve.

And what is it that the military serves, 2pid? Do you even know?

Nope.

What an utter dumb****.

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

May 21st 08, 08:35 AM

On May 20, 9:36*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On May 20, 4:37*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

> > For the umpteenth time, Jenn, 2pid's deal is different. No offense
> > intended, this is formatted so 2pid can understand.
>
> > GOIA good, Shhhh! and George bad.
>
> Arny's a jerk but you clones are the real sicko's around here.

I'm sick because I recognize your hypocrisy, your inanity, your
extreme stupidity and a bunch of other less-than-desireable traits
about you that nearly everybody else also recognizes but you do not?

Lol. Right.

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

May 21st 08, 08:40 AM

On May 20, 9:35*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On May 20, 3:57*pm, Jenn > wrote:

> > You give as well as you get with them. *It's between you guys.
>
> *You smear guys everywhere giving those social misfits
> such a title.

What "title"? Guy? Were you awarded that "title" or is there something
you want to tell us? Lol

What an imbecile. Your poor brain stem. It's obviously so overtaxed
that it's absurd.

> *But this everyone for themselves mentality is hardly a
> sign of character.

That's why you gang up on GOIA when he's a dick to Jenn.

What a worthless piece of **** you are, 2pid. You're beneath contempt,
actually. Lol

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

May 21st 08, 09:00 AM

On May 20, 9:39*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On May 20, 3:43*pm, Jenn > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article >,
> > *"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > > "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >
> > > > In article
> > > > >,
> > > > ScottW > wrote:
>
> > > >> On May 20, 12:49 pm, Jenn
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >>> In article
> > > >>> >, "Arny
> > > >>> Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > > >>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
> > > >>>> message
> > >
> > > >>>> y.
> > > >>>> com
> > > >>>>> In article
> > > >>>>> >, "Arny
> > > >>>>> Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > > >>>>>> It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing to be
> > > >>>>>> omniscient, and then play the pity card.
>
> > > >>>>> I'm not faulting you for being "omniscient".
>
> > > >>>> I never said you did.
>
> > > >>> You didn't? How do you know that it's "just like me"?
>
> > > >>>>> You took an
> > > >>>>> uneducated guess, and you were wrong.
>
> > > >>>> No, I was being a tiny bit sarcastic.
>
> > > >>> You should try being nice to people.
>
> > > >>>>> And I'm not playing the "pity card".
>
> > > >>>> Spare me!
>
> > > >>> Why spare you from the truth?
>
> > > >>>>> I'm pointing out what an asshole you're being.
>
> > > >>>> How sweet of you, Jenn.
>
> > > >>> You shouldn't pick fights if you don't want to have one.
>
> > > >>>>>>> What's your beef with me?
>
> > > >>>>>> Your lack of character.
>
> > > >>>>> More being an asshole on your part.
>
> > > >>>> No, just reflecting on readily observable facts.
>
> > > >>> I've asked this many times before and you haven't
> > > >>> answered the question: How, in your opinion, do I show
> > > >>> lack of character?
>
> > > >> People of character don't tolerate miscreants just
> > > >> because they aren't the brunt of their attention.
>
> > > >> ScottW
>
> > > > Speak to Arny, Scott. *Glass houses and all...
>
> > > Nahh, Scott is just noting your ongoing love affair with the Middiot.
>
> > You mean the guy that I basically never post to?
>
> *Yeah, the guy you're afraid to post to, that one.

For the umpteenth time, Jenn, 2pid's deal is different. No offense
intended, this is formatted so 2pid can understand.

GOIA good, Shhhh! and George bad.

Jenn bad because she say things to GOIA, who good. 2pid no say bad to
GOIA, because GOIA good. [Me forget to add: this also make 2pid good.]

2pid good because he say things to Shhhh! and George who bad. Jenn
bad
because she no say bad to Shhhh! or George, who also bad.

Now please don't be a hypocrite with no morals or integrity and say
that this isn't 100% logical. That would obviously be absurd.

GeoSynch

May 21st 08, 09:44 AM

SkiFastBadly wrote:

> Is there a device onto which I can load my CDS (the music, not the discs),
> which will hold the data as WAV, not mp3, which will act as a virtual CD
> player, meaning it will send a signal out to my pre-amp, which has
> wireless capability to go out to the internet to determine what CDs I'm
> loading, and will provide an easy UI that allows me to select CDs to play
> OR will play random cuts? And which will hold 500+ CDs?

If you're really serious, find a December 2007 issue of the The Absolute
Sound. Here is a link as to its contents:
http://www.enjoythemusic.com/tas/177/

Of particular interest will be three articles on pages 47, 60 and especially
79.

This may also be of interest:
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=937195

GeoSynch

Arny Krueger

May 21st 08, 12:08 PM

"Jenn" > wrote in message

> In article
> >,
> ScottW > wrote:
>
>> On May 20, 4:41 pm, George M. Middius
>> > wrote:
>>> Shhhh! said:
>>>
>>>> Now please don't be a hypocrite with no morals or
>>>> integrity and say that this isn't 100% logical. That
>>>> would obviously be absurd.
>>>
>>> I've heard the Bible is full of "absurd" stuff. What
>>> does Yapper think of that, I wonder?
>>
>> Obviously the christians here don't have the character
>> to defend their religion.

> Some Christians believe that the Bible DOES contain
> absurd stuff.

That's because that's what the Bible teaches, and unlike Jenn, some
Christians both know and try to follow what the Bible teaches.

Arny Krueger

May 21st 08, 12:09 PM

"ScottW" > wrote in message

> On May 20, 4:37 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> > wrote:
>> On May 20, 5:57 pm, Jenn
>> > wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> In article
>>> >,
>>
>>> ScottW > wrote:
>>>> On May 20, 1:18 pm, Jenn
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>> In article
>>>>> >,
>>
>>>>> ScottW > wrote:
>>>>>> On May 20, 12:49 pm, Jenn
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>> >,
>>>>>>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> igy.
>>>>>>>> com
>>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>>> >,
>>>>>>>>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>> It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing
>>>>>>>>>> to be omniscient, and then play the pity card.
>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm not faulting you for being "omniscient".
>>
>>>>>>>> I never said you did.
>>
>>>>>>> You didn't? How do you know that it's "just like
>>>>>>> me"?
>>
>>>>>>>>> You took an
>>>>>>>>> uneducated guess, and you were wrong.
>>
>>>>>>>> No, I was being a tiny bit sarcastic.
>>
>>>>>>> You should try being nice to people.
>>
>>>>>>>>> And I'm not playing the "pity card".
>>
>>>>>>>> Spare me!
>>
>>>>>>> Why spare you from the truth?
>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm pointing out what an asshole you're being.
>>
>>>>>>>> How sweet of you, Jenn.
>>
>>>>>>> You shouldn't pick fights if you don't want to have
>>>>>>> one.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> What's your beef with me?
>>
>>>>>>>>>> Your lack of character.
>>
>>>>>>>>> More being an asshole on your part.
>>
>>>>>>>> No, just reflecting on readily observable facts.
>>
>>>>>>> I've asked this many times before and you haven't
>>>>>>> answered the question:
>>>>>>> How, in your opinion, do I show lack of character?
>>
>>>>>> People of character don't tolerate miscreants just
>>>>>> because they aren't the brunt of their attention.
>>
>>>>>> ScottW
>>
>>>>> Speak to Arny, Scott. Glass houses and all...
>>
>>>> On the scale of snot, Arny is barely a buger compared
>>>> to the never ending stream that is Middiot/****R.
>>
>>>> ScottW
>>
>>> You give as well as you get with them. It's between you
>>> guys. What is between Arny and me is just that. The
>>> difference is I don't expect you to comment on Arny
>>> when it doesn't involve you.
>>
>> For the umpteenth time, Jenn, 2pid's deal is different.
>> No offense intended, this is formatted so 2pid can
>> understand.
>>
>> GOIA good, Shhhh! and George bad.
>
> Arny's a jerk but you clones are the real sicko's around
> here.

The Middiot and ****R aren't so much sick, as examples of what happens when
the body graduates from High School, but the mind never leaves it.

Arny Krueger

May 21st 08, 12:10 PM

Arny Krueger

May 21st 08, 12:11 PM

"ScottW" > wrote in message

> On May 20, 3:43 pm, Jenn >
> wrote:
>> In article
>> >, "Arny
>> Krueger" > wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>>>
>>>> In article
>>>> >,
>>>> ScottW > wrote:
>>
>>>>> On May 20, 12:49 pm, Jenn
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>> In article
>>>>>> >, "Arny
>>>>>> Krueger" > wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> y.
>>>>>>> com
>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>> >,
>>>>>>>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>> It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing
>>>>>>>>> to be omniscient, and then play the pity card.
>>
>>>>>>>> I'm not faulting you for being "omniscient".
>>
>>>>>>> I never said you did.
>>
>>>>>> You didn't? How do you know that it's "just like me"?
>>
>>>>>>>> You took an
>>>>>>>> uneducated guess, and you were wrong.
>>
>>>>>>> No, I was being a tiny bit sarcastic.
>>
>>>>>> You should try being nice to people.
>>
>>>>>>>> And I'm not playing the "pity card".
>>
>>>>>>> Spare me!
>>
>>>>>> Why spare you from the truth?
>>
>>>>>>>> I'm pointing out what an asshole you're being.
>>
>>>>>>> How sweet of you, Jenn.
>>
>>>>>> You shouldn't pick fights if you don't want to have
>>>>>> one.
>>
>>>>>>>>>> What's your beef with me?
>>
>>>>>>>>> Your lack of character.
>>
>>>>>>>> More being an asshole on your part.
>>
>>>>>>> No, just reflecting on readily observable facts.
>>
>>>>>> I've asked this many times before and you haven't
>>>>>> answered the question: How, in your opinion, do I
>>>>>> show lack of character?
>>
>>>>> People of character don't tolerate miscreants just
>>>>> because they aren't the brunt of their attention.
>>
>>>>> ScottW
>>
>>>> Speak to Arny, Scott. Glass houses and all...
>>
>>> Nahh, Scott is just noting your ongoing love affair
>>> with the Middiot.
>>
>> You mean the guy that I basically never post to?
>
> Yeah, the guy you're afraid to post to, that one.

Jenn really holding the Middiot up to a reasonable standard of behavior
would be like Skywalker criticizing Yoda. ;-)

Arny Krueger

May 21st 08, 12:12 PM

"Jenn" > wrote in message

> In article
> >,
> ScottW > wrote:
>
>> On May 20, 3:43 pm, Jenn
>> > wrote:
>>> In article
>>> >, "Arny
>>> Krueger" > wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
>>>> message
>>>> .
>>>> com
>>>>> In article
>>>>> >,
>>>>> ScottW > wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> On May 20, 12:49 pm, Jenn
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>> >,
>>>>>>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> dig
>>>>>>>> y.
>>>>>>>> com
>>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>>> >,
>>>>>>>>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing
>>>>>>>>>> to be omniscient, and then play the pity card.
>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm not faulting you for being "omniscient".
>>>
>>>>>>>> I never said you did.
>>>
>>>>>>> You didn't? How do you know that it's "just like
>>>>>>> me"?
>>>
>>>>>>>>> You took an
>>>>>>>>> uneducated guess, and you were wrong.
>>>
>>>>>>>> No, I was being a tiny bit sarcastic.
>>>
>>>>>>> You should try being nice to people.
>>>
>>>>>>>>> And I'm not playing the "pity card".
>>>
>>>>>>>> Spare me!
>>>
>>>>>>> Why spare you from the truth?
>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm pointing out what an asshole you're being.
>>>
>>>>>>>> How sweet of you, Jenn.
>>>
>>>>>>> You shouldn't pick fights if you don't want to have
>>>>>>> one.
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> What's your beef with me?
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Your lack of character.
>>>
>>>>>>>>> More being an asshole on your part.
>>>
>>>>>>>> No, just reflecting on readily observable facts.
>>>
>>>>>>> I've asked this many times before and you haven't
>>>>>>> answered the question: How, in your opinion, do I
>>>>>>> show lack of character?
>>>
>>>>>> People of character don't tolerate miscreants just
>>>>>> because they aren't the brunt of their attention.
>>>
>>>>>> ScottW
>>>
>>>>> Speak to Arny, Scott. Glass houses and all...
>>>
>>>> Nahh, Scott is just noting your ongoing love affair
>>>> with the Middiot.
>>>
>>> You mean the guy that I basically never post to?
>>
>> Yeah, the guy you're afraid to post to, that one.
>>
>> ScottW
>
> Are you afraid to post to Arny?

Jenn, he does it reasonbly often, but you're blind to it.

Arny Krueger

May 21st 08, 12:15 PM

"Harry Lavo" > wrote in message

> You: education using MACs = foolish

...and unecessarily expensive.

> musicians/engineers spending money on MACs to record music

Very old school, and foolish and expensive.

Therefore, at best false premises.

> But by implication then: education using MACs =
> thousands upon thousands of worker-bees using word
> processing and spreadsheeting on MACx in the office.

Irrelevant. No logical connection shown.

> If MACs in schools wre the source of musicians using
> MACs, Arny, why is it not also the source of worker-bees
> using MACs in our offices.

No logical connection shown.

BTW, folks if you look at the properties of Harry's posts, they come from a
computer that is running MS Windows.

Arny Krueger

May 21st 08, 12:17 PM

"ScottW" > wrote in message

> On May 20, 6:59 pm, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>> "Harry Lavo" > wrote in message
>>
>>

>>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
>>> . ..

>>>> Ever see the stats for sales of Photoshop for the PC
>>>> versus Photoshop for the Mac?

>>> Relative to market share, the MAC wins.

>> Prove it Harry. Provide a URL supporting this claim or
>> admit that you're making it up as you go along.

> Looks to me like Adobe is turning their back on Apple.

> http://www.tuaw.com/2008/04/03/apple-adobe-and-64-bit-photoshop/

Something about Adobe being a well-managed company that follows long-term
market trends.

Arny Krueger

May 21st 08, 12:20 PM

"GeoSynch" > wrote in message

> SkiFastBadly wrote:
>
>> Is there a device onto which I can load my CDS (the
>> music, not the discs), which will hold the data as WAV,
>> not mp3, which will act as a virtual CD player, meaning
>> it will send a signal out to my pre-amp, which has
>> wireless capability to go out to the internet to
>> determine what CDs I'm loading, and will provide an easy
>> UI that allows me to select CDs to play OR will play
>> random cuts? And which will hold 500+ CDs?
>
> If you're really serious, find a December 2007 issue of
> the The Absolute Sound. Here is a link as to its contents:
> http://www.enjoythemusic.com/tas/177/
>
> Of particular interest will be three articles on pages
> 47, 60 and especially 79.
>
> This may also be of interest:
> http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=937195

"The Absolute Sound editor Robert Harley (in the December 2007 issue) has
published a seminal work comparing computer based Music Servers to
traditional dedicated CD playback. Mr. Harley rightfully concludes that
optical disc CD playback is inferior to hard-disk based playback.
This is really good news as I’ve been none too kind to the high-end industry
for dragging **s. Finally expensive rotational CD transports are now
officially declared obsolete and worthless. Pay particular attention to
Stereophile magazine who still frequently review (and carries ads) for the
most outrageously priced CD disc playback gear. (If only I could sell
tickets!)

Now that the rotational music era is finished, Mr. Harley with the
assistance of Karl Schuster, quickly moves on to provide a step-by-step
guide to turning your PC into a music server. It is the best single source
of concise information and puts the fragmented piece-meal Internet searches
to shame. "

Best single guide? That would be a first!

I've been advocating playing music on PCs since the 1990s, and gotten abused
by the usual RAO idiot trolls all along.

Clyde Slick

May 21st 08, 12:40 PM

On 21 Mai, 07:08, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> m
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article
> > >,
> > ScottW > wrote:
>
> >> On May 20, 4:41 pm, George M. Middius
> >> > wrote:
> >>> Shhhh! said:
>
> >>>> Now please don't be a hypocrite with no morals or
> >>>> integrity and say that this isn't 100% logical. That
> >>>> would obviously be absurd.
>
> >>> I've heard the Bible is full of "absurd" stuff. What
> >>> does Yapper think of that, I wonder?
>
> >> *Obviously the christians here don't have the character
> >> to defend their religion.
> > Some Christians believe that the Bible DOES contain
> > absurd stuff.
>
> That's because that's what the Bible teaches, and unlike Jenn, some
> Christians both know and try to follow what the Bible teaches.-

Like such rot that dinosaurs and humans existed at the same time.

Clyde Slick

May 21st 08, 12:44 PM

On 21 Mai, 07:20, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "GeoSynch" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > SkiFastBadly wrote:
>
> >> Is there a device onto which I can load my CDS (the
> >> music, not the discs), which will hold the data as WAV,
> >> not mp3, which will act as a virtual CD player, meaning
> >> it will send a signal out to my pre-amp, which has
> >> wireless capability to go out to the internet to
> >> determine what CDs I'm loading, and will provide an easy
> >> UI that allows me to select CDs to play OR will play
> >> random cuts? *And which will hold 500+ CDs?
>
> > If you're really serious, find a December 2007 issue of
> > the The Absolute Sound. Here is a link as to its contents:
> >http://www.enjoythemusic.com/tas/177/
>
> > Of particular interest will be three articles on pages
> > 47, 60 and especially 79.
>
> > This may also be of interest:
> >http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=937195
>
> "The Absolute Sound editor Robert Harley (in the December 2007 issue) has
> published a seminal work comparing computer based Music Servers to
> traditional dedicated CD playback. Mr. Harley rightfully concludes that
> optical disc CD playback is inferior to hard-disk based playback.
> This is really good news as I’ve been none too kind to the high-end industry
> for dragging **s. Finally expensive rotational CD transports are now
> officially declared obsolete and worthless. Pay particular attention to
> Stereophile magazine who still frequently review (and carries ads) for the
> most outrageously priced CD disc playback gear. (If only I could sell
> tickets!)
>
> Now that the rotational music era is finished, Mr. Harley with the
> assistance of Karl Schuster, quickly moves on to provide a step-by-step
> guide to turning your PC into a music server. It is the best single source
> of concise information and puts the fragmented piece-meal Internet searches
> to shame. "
>
> Best single guide? That would be a first!
>
> I've been advocating playing music on PCs since the 1990s, and gotten abused
> by the usual RAO idiot trolls all along.-

But you also argued that almost any $99 cd player puts out perfect cd
sound.

Arny Krueger

May 21st 08, 12:56 PM

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message

> On 21 Mai, 07:08, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> In article
>>> >,
>>> ScottW > wrote:
>>
>>>> On May 20, 4:41 pm, George M. Middius
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>> Shhhh! said:
>>
>>>>>> Now please don't be a hypocrite with no morals or
>>>>>> integrity and say that this isn't 100% logical. That
>>>>>> would obviously be absurd.
>>
>>>>> I've heard the Bible is full of "absurd" stuff. What
>>>>> does Yapper think of that, I wonder?
>>
>>>> Obviously the christians here don't have the character
>>>> to defend their religion.

>>> Some Christians believe that the Bible DOES contain
>>> absurd stuff.

>> That's because that's what the Bible teaches, and unlike
>> Jenn, some Christians both know and try to follow what
>> the Bible teaches.-

> Like such rot that dinosaurs and humans existed at the
> same time.

Got a chapter and verse for that one?

Nahh, I didn't think so.

Arny Krueger

May 21st 08, 12:57 PM

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message

> On 21 Mai, 07:20, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>> "GeoSynch" > wrote in message
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> SkiFastBadly wrote:
>>
>>>> Is there a device onto which I can load my CDS (the
>>>> music, not the discs), which will hold the data as WAV,
>>>> not mp3, which will act as a virtual CD player, meaning
>>>> it will send a signal out to my pre-amp, which has
>>>> wireless capability to go out to the internet to
>>>> determine what CDs I'm loading, and will provide an
>>>> easy UI that allows me to select CDs to play OR will
>>>> play random cuts? And which will hold 500+ CDs?
>>
>>> If you're really serious, find a December 2007 issue of
>>> the The Absolute Sound. Here is a link as to its
>>> contents: http://www.enjoythemusic.com/tas/177/
>>
>>> Of particular interest will be three articles on pages
>>> 47, 60 and especially 79.
>>
>>> This may also be of interest:
>>> http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=937195
>>
>> "The Absolute Sound editor Robert Harley (in the
>> December 2007 issue) has published a seminal work
>> comparing computer based Music Servers to traditional
>> dedicated CD playback. Mr. Harley rightfully concludes
>> that optical disc CD playback is inferior to hard-disk
>> based playback.
>> This is really good news as I’ve been none too kind to
>> the high-end industry for dragging **s. Finally
>> expensive rotational CD transports are now officially
>> declared obsolete and worthless. Pay particular
>> attention to Stereophile magazine who still frequently
>> review (and carries ads) for the most outrageously
>> priced CD disc playback gear. (If only I could sell
>> tickets!)
>>
>> Now that the rotational music era is finished, Mr.
>> Harley with the assistance of Karl Schuster, quickly
>> moves on to provide a step-by-step guide to turning your
>> PC into a music server. It is the best single source of
>> concise information and puts the fragmented piece-meal
>> Internet searches to shame. "
>>
>> Best single guide? That would be a first!
>>
>> I've been advocating playing music on PCs since the
>> 1990s, and gotten abused by the usual RAO idiot trolls
>> all along.-
>
> But you also argued that almost any $99 cd player puts
> out perfect cd sound.

Prove me wrong.

Arny Krueger

May 21st 08, 02:03 PM

"MiNe 109" > wrote in message

> In article
> >,
> Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
>> On 21 Mai, 07:08, "Arny Krueger" >
>> wrote:
>>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>>>
>>>
>>> om
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> In article
>>>> >,
>>>> ScottW > wrote:
>>>
>>>>> On May 20, 4:41 pm, George M. Middius
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>> Shhhh! said:
>>>
>>>>>>> Now please don't be a hypocrite with no morals or
>>>>>>> integrity and say that this isn't 100% logical. That
>>>>>>> would obviously be absurd.
>>>
>>>>>> I've heard the Bible is full of "absurd" stuff. What
>>>>>> does Yapper think of that, I wonder?
>>>
>>>>> Obviously the christians here don't have the character
>>>>> to defend their religion.
>>>> Some Christians believe that the Bible DOES contain
>>>> absurd stuff.
>>>
>>> That's because that's what the Bible teaches, and
>>> unlike Jenn, some Christians both know and try to
>>> follow what the Bible teaches.-
>>
>> Like such rot that dinosaurs and humans existed at the
>> same time.
>
> http://home9.inet.tele.dk/mha/Images/jesus-dinosaur.gif
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/58362611@N00/431306643/

Wow, that's conclusive evidence about what the Bible teaches, Stephen. Did
you learn what you know about music from comic books or what? ;-)

Arny Krueger

May 21st 08, 02:04 PM

"MiNe 109" > wrote in message

> In article
> >,
> ScottW > wrote:
>
>>>> Nahh, Scott is just noting your ongoing love affair
>>>> with the Middiot.
>>>
>>> You mean the guy that I basically never post to?
>>
>> Yeah, the guy you're afraid to post to, that one.
>
> Damned if you do...

Damned if you don't.

It is the sort of risk you have to take when you're dealing with people who
are hopelessly self-centered.

Harry Lavo

May 21st 08, 02:37 PM

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
. ..
> "Harry Lavo" > wrote in message
>
>
>> You: education using MACs = foolish
>
> ..and unecessarily expensive.
>
>> musicians/engineers spending money on MACs to record music
>
> Very old school, and foolish and expensive.
>
> Therefore, at best false premises.
>
>> But by implication then: education using MACs =
>> thousands upon thousands of worker-bees using word
>> processing and spreadsheeting on MACx in the office.
>
> Irrelevant. No logical connection shown.
>
>> If MACs in schools wre the source of musicians using
>> MACs, Arny, why is it not also the source of worker-bees
>> using MACs in our offices.
>
> No logical connection shown.
>
> BTW, folks if you look at the properties of Harry's posts, they come from
> a computer that is running MS Windows.

Yep, because I've got years of legacy using PC's (back in the early '80's)
for business purposes....but if I were starting over I'd go MAC, as my
daughter the multimedia editor has done, and my niece, and my nephew, and my
sister and her husband. But I've got a ton of PC software, and I upgrade my
own gear, so it has been a natural evolution for me. But I'll flat out say
the MACs are better for media work, although its a lot closer than it used
to be in terms of getting the work done.....but the MAC is still head and
shoulders above the PC in operating system reliability.

Harry Lavo

May 21st 08, 02:41 PM

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
. ..
> "ScottW" > wrote in message
>
>> On May 20, 6:59 pm, "Arny Krueger" >
>> wrote:
>>> "Harry Lavo" > wrote in message
>>>
>>>
>
>>>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
>>>> . ..
>
>>>>> Ever see the stats for sales of Photoshop for the PC
>>>>> versus Photoshop for the Mac?
>
>>>> Relative to market share, the MAC wins.
>
>>> Prove it Harry. Provide a URL supporting this claim or
>>> admit that you're making it up as you go along.
>
>> Looks to me like Adobe is turning their back on Apple.
>
>> http://www.tuaw.com/2008/04/03/apple-adobe-and-64-bit-photoshop/
>
> Something about Adobe being a well-managed company that follows long-term
> market trends.

Right. It has nothing to do with them moving to a complete overhaul/rewrite
of the software so that it is much more multiplatform in its basic
structure, does it? Postponing the 64 bit upgrade to the newer
software....THAT is a logical business decision (maybe not the best for
Photoshop loyalists) but certainly understandable.

Arny Krueger

May 21st 08, 04:58 PM

"Harry Lavo" > wrote in message

> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
> . ..
>> "Harry Lavo" > wrote in message
>>
>>
>>> You: education using MACs = foolish
>>
>> ..and unecessarily expensive.
>>
>>> musicians/engineers spending money on MACs to record
>>> music
>>
>> Very old school, and foolish and expensive.
>>
>> Therefore, at best false premises.
>>
>>> But by implication then: education using MACs =
>>> thousands upon thousands of worker-bees using word
>>> processing and spreadsheeting on MACx in the office.
>>
>> Irrelevant. No logical connection shown.
>>
>>> If MACs in schools wre the source of musicians using
>>> MACs, Arny, why is it not also the source of worker-bees
>>> using MACs in our offices.
>>
>> No logical connection shown.
>>
>> BTW, folks if you look at the properties of Harry's
>> posts, they come from a computer that is running MS
>> Windows.
>
> Yep, because I've got years of legacy using PC's (back in
> the early '80's) for business purposes....

Well, you started out right, Harry.

> but if I were
> starting over I'd go MAC, as my daughter the multimedia
> editor has done,

I see that poor critical thinking may run in the family. Or maybe its a job
thing. My daughter worked in a lab that was run by Mac bigots.

> and my niece, and my nephew, and my
> sister and her husband.

Birds of a feather flock together, it seems.

> But I've got a ton of PC
> software, and I upgrade my own gear, so it has been a
> natural evolution for me.

The point is Harry, that you don't practice what you preach, again.

> But I'll flat out say the MACs are better for media work,

The market disagrees with you Harry. Every multimedia product worth its salt
runs primarily on a PC these days. If there are any exceptions, its because
McIntosh forcably keeps it from being ported to the dominant platform, in a
vain attempt to keep on selling their overpriced software.

>although its a lot closer than
> it used to be in terms of getting the work done.....but
> the MAC is still head and shoulders above the PC in
> operating system reliability.

Nahhh. It's also way down on compatiblity with most of the real world.

But I can see how someone who buys into High End Audio hype would carry the
same lack of critical thinking to their computer preferences, at least their
computer preferences in their dreams.

George M. Middius[_4_]

May 21st 08, 05:09 PM

MiNe 109 said:

> > Like such rot that dinosaurs and humans existed at the same time.

> http://www.flickr.com/photos/58362611@N00/431306643

"Jesus riding dinosaur"

That's a nice tunic JEE-zus is wearing. The highlights look like
polyester or rayon. Are anachronisms a problem for "real christians"?

George M. Middius[_4_]

May 21st 08, 05:10 PM

Jenn said:

> Ok. I expect you to now take on Arny on my behalf. Then there is the
> whole "two Bobs" thing. Engage!

I'm glad to hear you haven't suffered breast cancer, Jenn. Mazel tov.

George M. Middius[_4_]

May 21st 08, 05:12 PM

Jenn said:

> > I don't know about that Jenn, but you surely hold him up to a far lower
> > standard than your usual whipping boys, such as mysefl and Scott.
>
> Wow, talk about your "pity party"! lol

I think you're wearing the wrong party dress. Turdy's current frame of
mind indicates he's picturing this one:

http://tiny.cc/SKPfW

George M. Middius[_4_]

May 21st 08, 05:13 PM

Shhhh! said:

> > > GOIA good, Shhhh! and George bad.
> >
> > Arny's a jerk but you clones are the real sicko's around here.
>
> I'm sick because I recognize your hypocrisy, your inanity, your
> extreme stupidity and a bunch of other less-than-desireable traits
> about you that nearly everybody else also recognizes but you do not?

Now you've got it.

> Lol. Right.

Well, really. Are you laughing or agreeing with Scottie? You ex-military
guys are sooooo complicated.

Jenn[_2_]

May 21st 08, 05:18 PM

In article
>,
MiNe 109 > wrote:

> In article
> >,
> ScottW > wrote:
>
> > > > Nahh, Scott is just noting your ongoing love affair with the Middiot.
> > >
> > > You mean the guy that I basically never post to?
> >
> > Yeah, the guy you're afraid to post to, that one.
>
> Damned if you do...
>
> Stephen

You noticed! ;-)

Jenn[_2_]

May 21st 08, 05:20 PM

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "ScottW" > wrote in message
>
> > On May 20, 3:43 pm, Jenn >
> > wrote:
> >> In article
> >> >, "Arny
> >> Krueger" > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >>>
> >>> .com
> >>>> In article
> >>>> >,
> >>>> ScottW > wrote:
> >>
> >>>>> On May 20, 12:49 pm, Jenn
> >>>>> > wrote:
> >>>>>> In article
> >>>>>> >, "Arny
> >>>>>> Krueger" > wrote:
> >>
> >>>>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
> >>>>>>> message
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> dig
> >>>>>>> y.
> >>>>>>> com
> >>>>>>>> In article
> >>>>>>>> >,
> >>>>>>>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >>
> >>>>>>>>> It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing
> >>>>>>>>> to be omniscient, and then play the pity card.
> >>
> >>>>>>>> I'm not faulting you for being "omniscient".
> >>
> >>>>>>> I never said you did.
> >>
> >>>>>> You didn't? How do you know that it's "just like me"?
> >>
> >>>>>>>> You took an
> >>>>>>>> uneducated guess, and you were wrong.
> >>
> >>>>>>> No, I was being a tiny bit sarcastic.
> >>
> >>>>>> You should try being nice to people.
> >>
> >>>>>>>> And I'm not playing the "pity card".
> >>
> >>>>>>> Spare me!
> >>
> >>>>>> Why spare you from the truth?
> >>
> >>>>>>>> I'm pointing out what an asshole you're being.
> >>
> >>>>>>> How sweet of you, Jenn.
> >>
> >>>>>> You shouldn't pick fights if you don't want to have
> >>>>>> one.
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>> What's your beef with me?
> >>
> >>>>>>>>> Your lack of character.
> >>
> >>>>>>>> More being an asshole on your part.
> >>
> >>>>>>> No, just reflecting on readily observable facts.
> >>
> >>>>>> I've asked this many times before and you haven't
> >>>>>> answered the question: How, in your opinion, do I
> >>>>>> show lack of character?
> >>
> >>>>> People of character don't tolerate miscreants just
> >>>>> because they aren't the brunt of their attention.
> >>
> >>>>> ScottW
> >>
> >>>> Speak to Arny, Scott. Glass houses and all...
> >>
> >>> Nahh, Scott is just noting your ongoing love affair
> >>> with the Middiot.
> >>
> >> You mean the guy that I basically never post to?
> >
> > Yeah, the guy you're afraid to post to, that one.
>
> Jenn really holding the Middiot up to a reasonable standard of behavior
> would be like Skywalker criticizing Yoda. ;-)

Idiotic statement.

Jenn[_2_]

May 21st 08, 05:21 PM

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> > In article
> > >,
> > ScottW > wrote:
> >
> >> On May 20, 4:41 pm, George M. Middius
> >> > wrote:
> >>> Shhhh! said:
> >>>
> >>>> Now please don't be a hypocrite with no morals or
> >>>> integrity and say that this isn't 100% logical. That
> >>>> would obviously be absurd.
> >>>
> >>> I've heard the Bible is full of "absurd" stuff. What
> >>> does Yapper think of that, I wonder?
> >>
> >> Obviously the christians here don't have the character
> >> to defend their religion.
>
> > Some Christians believe that the Bible DOES contain
> > absurd stuff.
>
> That's because that's what the Bible teaches,

Which is why I wrote what I did. Duh.

> and unlike Jenn, some
> Christians both know and try to follow what the Bible teaches.

You REALLY don't want to go there, Arny.

George M. Middius[_4_]

May 21st 08, 05:27 PM

The Krooborg smacks its lips and orders a McFishBurger.

> > the MAC is still head and shoulders above the PC in
> > operating system reliability.
>
> Nahhh[sic]. It's also way down on compatiblity with most of the real world.

Would you like fries with that, Arnii? How about a fake milkshake?

George M. Middius[_4_]

May 21st 08, 05:34 PM

Jenn said:

> > and unlike Jenn, some
> > Christians both know and try to follow what the Bible teaches.
>
> You REALLY don't want to go there, Arny.

Did you consider the possibility that Arnii is practicing his new
standup routine?

Jenn[_2_]

May 21st 08, 05:36 PM

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On May 20, 11:03*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > In article
> > >,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > On May 20, 3:57*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > >,
> >
> > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > On May 20, 1:18*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > > > In article
> > > > > > >,
> >
> > > > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > > > On May 20, 12:49*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > > > > > In article >,
> > > > > > > > *"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > "Jenn" > wrote in message
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >ews.
> > > > > > > > >prod
> > > > > > > > >igy.
> > > > > > > > >com
> > > > > > > > > > In article >,
> > > > > > > > > > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > >> It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing to be
> > > > > > > > > >> omniscient, and then play the pity card.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > I'm not faulting you for being "omniscient".
> >
> > > > > > > > > I never said you did.
> >
> > > > > > > > You didn't? *How do you know that it's "just like me"?
> >
> > > > > > > > > > You took an
> > > > > > > > > > uneducated guess, and you were wrong.
> >
> > > > > > > > > No, I was being a tiny bit sarcastic.
> >
> > > > > > > > You should try being nice to people.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > And I'm not playing the "pity card".
> >
> > > > > > > > > Spare me!
> >
> > > > > > > > Why spare you from the truth?
> >
> > > > > > > > > > *I'm pointing out what an asshole you're being.
> >
> > > > > > > > > How sweet of you, Jenn.
> >
> > > > > > > > You shouldn't pick fights if you don't want to have one.
> >
> > > > > > > > > >>> What's your beef with me?
> >
> > > > > > > > > >> Your lack of character.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > More being an asshole on your part.
> >
> > > > > > > > > No, just reflecting on readily observable facts.
> >
> > > > > > > > I've asked this many times before and you haven't answered the
> > > > > > > > question: *
> > > > > > > > How, in your opinion, do I show lack of character?
> >
> > > > > > > People of character don't tolerate miscreants just because they
> > > > > > > aren't the brunt of their attention.
> >
> > > > > > > ScottW
> >
> > > > > > Speak to Arny, Scott. *Glass houses and all...
> >
> > > > > On the scale of snot, Arny is barely a buger compared to the
> > > > > never ending stream that is Middiot/****R.
> >
> > > > > ScottW
> >
> > > > You give as well as you get with them. *It's between you guys.
> >
> > > *You smear guys everywhere giving those social misfits
> > > such a title.
> >
> > > *But this everyone for themselves mentality is hardly a
> > > sign of character.
> >
> > > ScottW
> >
> > Ok. *I expect you to now take on Arny on my behalf.
>
> When he just starts spamming childish insult and vulgarities,
> I'll be right on it.

You're already late.

>
> ScottW
>
> > *Then there is the
> > whole "two Bobs" thing. *Engage!
>
> Which one?

There's more than one set?

Jenn[_2_]

May 21st 08, 05:43 PM

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On May 20, 11:01*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > In article
> > >,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > On May 20, 3:43*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > In article >,
> > > > *"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > > > "Jenn" > wrote in message
> > > >
> > > > >igy.
> > > > >com
> > > > > > In article
> > > > > > >,
> > > > > > ScottW > wrote:
> >
> > > > > >> On May 20, 12:49 pm, Jenn
> > > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > >>> In article
> > > > > >>> >, "Arny
> > > > > >>> Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > > > >>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
> > > > > >>>> message
> > > > >
> > > > > >>>>.pro
> > > > > >>>>dig
> > > > > >>>> y.
> > > > > >>>> com
> > > > > >>>>> In article
> > > > > >>>>> >, "Arny
> > > > > >>>>> Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > > > >>>>>> It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing to be
> > > > > >>>>>> omniscient, and then play the pity card.
> >
> > > > > >>>>> I'm not faulting you for being "omniscient".
> >
> > > > > >>>> I never said you did.
> >
> > > > > >>> You didn't? How do you know that it's "just like me"?
> >
> > > > > >>>>> You took an
> > > > > >>>>> uneducated guess, and you were wrong.
> >
> > > > > >>>> No, I was being a tiny bit sarcastic.
> >
> > > > > >>> You should try being nice to people.
> >
> > > > > >>>>> And I'm not playing the "pity card".
> >
> > > > > >>>> Spare me!
> >
> > > > > >>> Why spare you from the truth?
> >
> > > > > >>>>> I'm pointing out what an asshole you're being.
> >
> > > > > >>>> How sweet of you, Jenn.
> >
> > > > > >>> You shouldn't pick fights if you don't want to have one.
> >
> > > > > >>>>>>> What's your beef with me?
> >
> > > > > >>>>>> Your lack of character.
> >
> > > > > >>>>> More being an asshole on your part.
> >
> > > > > >>>> No, just reflecting on readily observable facts.
> >
> > > > > >>> I've asked this many times before and you haven't
> > > > > >>> answered the question: How, in your opinion, do I show
> > > > > >>> lack of character?
> >
> > > > > >> People of character don't tolerate miscreants just
> > > > > >> because they aren't the brunt of their attention.
> >
> > > > > >> ScottW
> >
> > > > > > Speak to Arny, Scott. *Glass houses and all...
> >
> > > > > Nahh, Scott is just noting your ongoing love affair with the Middiot.
> >
> > > > You mean the guy that I basically never post to?
> >
> > > *Yeah, the guy you're afraid to post to, that one.
> >
> > > ScottW
> >
> > Are you afraid to post to Arny?
>
> Post to Arny, Jenn seems to think you're scary.

Huh? lol

> So does Middiot and ****r, I think you're harmlessly
> obnoxious.
> Middiot and ****r are disgusting.
> Subtle distinction but one I can tolerate and the other
> I'd rather not have to.

Then don't post to them.

>
> ScottW

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

May 21st 08, 07:34 PM

On May 21, 11:45Â*am, ScottW > wrote:
> On May 21, 12:31Â*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> > On May 20, 9:48Â*pm, ScottW > wrote:
>
> > > On May 20, 5:36Â*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > On May 20, 3:56Â*pm, ScottW > wrote:
>
> > > > > On May 20, 1:40Â*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > On May 20, 3:34Â*pm, ScottW > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On May 20, 1:24Â*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > > > > > For Scott: Â*I'm against the throwing of such snot.
>
> > > > > > > Â*One must ask, is this the best a person of character can do?
>
> > > > > > Not at all, 2pid. She could cast aspersions about other people's
> > > > > > military service, like some other "people of character" do here.
>
> > > > > I don't need to cast aspersions about your service.
> > > > > You did that bragging about discarding it as an act of protest
> > > > > yourself.
>
> > > > Discard what, 2pid? I didn't throw anything away. One of us has a
> > > > "Major, Retired, U.S. Army" ID card. One of us does not. ;-)
>
> > > Â*And one of us bragged that their "retirement" was an act of protest.
>
> > Bull****.
>
> LoL, now you want to run away from your own history.
> Perhaps another act of retirement is in order?

Well, in two years you and Clyde have gone from "Shhhh! is not a
retired military officer" to "But you Retired in Protest!" Perhaps in
another two years the trurh that you are apparently so afraid of will
sink through your Densium skull. Lol!

Here you go, 2pid: the very first mention of my reasons for retiring
from the military that I can find in Google, just for you!

************************************************** **********************
>Semantics.... now you must define invasion for us.
>Any military incursion inside their borders? How about air space?

Actually, I do not have to define anything for 'us.' In fact, there is
nothing that I 'must' do for you, 'us' or anybody else.

If you want to, why don't you define 'invasion' for 'us'?

Scott, without getting lost in minutiae and arguing about whatever
happened on April 3rd 1946 at 12:00, as is the typical response to any
claim or argument made on r.a.o that I've seen, and which is also the
track you are very much trying to go down here, the point is this:

Unlike the Roman, Macedonians, Greeks, Norse, Spanish, British,
French,
Germans, or any other 'empire' down throught the ages, we have not,
until now, tried to invade other nation-states to militarily conquer
other lands to make them bend to our will. We changed from the War
Department to the Department of Defense. That, to me, was more than
just a symbolic name change. We should change it back.

You, on the other hand, want to claim that actions such as this:

NICARAGUA
1981-90
Command operation, naval CIA directs exile (Contra) invasions, plants
harbor mines against revolution.

are exactly the same. I disagree.

You believe whatever you wish. I find this much more interesting than
debating minutiae with you:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11467986/

Particularly this quote:

At any rate, the school isn't just about operating in Iraq, Short
said,
but about preparing officers for the rest of their careers. "I think
*we're going to be in more of these wars*," he said. (Emphasis mine.)

So my point, before it gets lost in a boring (I should say *more*
boring) debate with you about what constitutes an invasion vs. another
operation in your mind, is this: we have, as a nation and a military,
turned a corner that I disagree with. That was what I said. That was
what I meant. That was, in part, why I chose to retire when I did. And
I stand by that statement.

On the bright side, another point that I've made is that the military
is very ill-suited to these missions. It appears that, after three
years, they're starting to figure that out. Unfortunately, as the
article says, in order to do the job right, we have to leave our
bases.
That is without question true, but that also exposes the troops to
higher levels of danger.

So Scott, you go on your merry little way and argue that the US has
acted exactly the same as the previous empire-building nations that
have had the biggest, baddest militaries on Earth have acted down
through history. I don't think that we have in the past. I think we
are
starting to now. You disagree. I predict the results will be the same
for us. You probably think that we will somehow get a different result
from what history has shown, just as rummy thinks that new weapons
mean
the underlying concepts of warfare have changed.

Whatever.

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/msg/1e5bffbb31618f59?dmode=source
************************************************** *****************

Now let's see this, 2pid!
************************************************** ****************
brag (brÄƒg)
v., bragged, bragÂ·ging, brags.
v.intr.
To talk boastfully. See synonyms at boast1.
v.tr.
To assert boastfully.
n.

Andrew Barss

May 21st 08, 10:47 PM

SkiFastBadly > wrote:
: Yeah, I googled and came up with nothing.

: Is there a device onto which I can load my CDS (the music, not the discs),
: which will hold the data as WAV, not mp3, which will act as a virtual CD
: player, meaning it will send a signal out to my pre-amp, which has wireless
: capability to go out to the internet to determine what CDs I'm loading, and
: will provide an easy UI that allows me to select CDs to play OR will play
: random cuts? And which will hold 500+ CDs?

A hard drive to hold the data (for portability, use an external HD).
I just losslessly ripped (to FLAC format files) about 400 CDs, which
take up about 140 GBs. You can get a HD larger than this for about $75.
(Get two, one for backup, if you're worried about crashing).

For actually getting the data to your stereo, one option is the
Squeezebox, sold by SlimDevices. Excellent DAC inside, and
very nice (and free) software. See:

http://www.slimdevices.com

the new model, with a video interface, is the Duet; the Classic
doesn't have this (but is a nice piece of equipment).

The hard drive can be attached to a Windows, Mac, or Limux computer, or to a network storage
drive.

-- Andy Barss

Harry Lavo

May 21st 08, 10:47 PM

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> "Harry Lavo" > wrote in message
>
>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
>> . ..
>>> "Harry Lavo" > wrote in message
>>>
>>>
>>>> You: education using MACs = foolish
>>>
>>> ..and unecessarily expensive.
>>>
>>>> musicians/engineers spending money on MACs to record
>>>> music
>>>
>>> Very old school, and foolish and expensive.
>>>
>>> Therefore, at best false premises.
>>>
>>>> But by implication then: education using MACs =
>>>> thousands upon thousands of worker-bees using word
>>>> processing and spreadsheeting on MACx in the office.
>>>
>>> Irrelevant. No logical connection shown.
>>>
>>>> If MACs in schools wre the source of musicians using
>>>> MACs, Arny, why is it not also the source of worker-bees
>>>> using MACs in our offices.
>>>
>>> No logical connection shown.
>>>
>>> BTW, folks if you look at the properties of Harry's
>>> posts, they come from a computer that is running MS
>>> Windows.
>>
>> Yep, because I've got years of legacy using PC's (back in
>> the early '80's) for business purposes....
>
> Well, you started out right, Harry.

I started out logically, Arny, since I had a pretty good intuition as to
what my businesses needs would be. Religous certainty had nothing to do
with it.

>> but if I were
>> starting over I'd go MAC, as my daughter the multimedia
>> editor has done,
>
> I see that poor critical thinking may run in the family. Or maybe its a
> job thing. My daughter worked in a lab that was run by Mac bigots.

Ever hear of the Final Cut Pro Suite, Arny? Its the standard for this kind
of work. And it is a MAC program.

>> and my niece, and my nephew, and my
>> sister and her husband.

Educators, all. Again, using the standard tools of their trade, Arny. And
BTW they get them at good academic discounts...green again, Arny?

> Birds of a feather flock together, it seems.

Didn't you mother ever tell you to just shut up if you ave nothing to say,
Arny?

>> But I've got a ton of PC
>> software, and I upgrade my own gear, so it has been a
>> natural evolution for me.
>
> The point is Harry, that you don't practice what you preach, again.

What am I "preaching" Arny? Theirs that religiousity again...totally out
of line with reality.

>
>> But I'll flat out say the MACs are better for media work,
>
> The market disagrees with you Harry. Every multimedia product worth its
> salt runs primarily on a PC these days. If there are any exceptions, its
> because McIntosh forcably keeps it from being ported to the dominant
> platform, in a vain attempt to keep on selling their overpriced software.

Again, ever hear of Final Cut Pro, Arny? Aperture? These are professional
standards, as well as Photoshop for the MAC.

>>although its a lot closer than
>> it used to be in terms of getting the work done.....but
>> the MAC is still head and shoulders above the PC in
>> operating system reliability.
>
> Nahhh. It's also way down on compatiblity with most of the real world.

I see. Dual boot is "way down on compatibility" Arny? How well do PC's run
MAC software, Arny. With or without dual boot?

>
> But I can see how someone who buys into High End Audio hype would carry
> the same lack of critical thinking to their computer preferences, at least
> their computer preferences in their dreams.

You are the one saying I have a MAC preference, not me. Computers are
tools, Arny, not things to worship.

SkiFastBadly

May 21st 08, 11:02 PM

"Andrew Barss" > wrote in message
...
> SkiFastBadly > wrote:
> : Yeah, I googled and came up with nothing.
>
> : Is there a device onto which I can load my CDS (the music, not the
> discs),
> : which will hold the data as WAV, not mp3, which will act as a virtual CD
> : player, meaning it will send a signal out to my pre-amp, which has
> wireless
> : capability to go out to the internet to determine what CDs I'm loading,
> and
> : will provide an easy UI that allows me to select CDs to play OR will
> play
> : random cuts? And which will hold 500+ CDs?
>
>
> A hard drive to hold the data (for portability, use an external HD).
> I just losslessly ripped (to FLAC format files) about 400 CDs, which
> take up about 140 GBs. You can get a HD larger than this for about $75.
> (Get two, one for backup, if you're worried about crashing).
>
>
> For actually getting the data to your stereo, one option is the
> Squeezebox, sold by SlimDevices. Excellent DAC inside, and
> very nice (and free) software. See:
>
>
> http://www.slimdevices.com
>
>
> the new model, with a video interface, is the Duet; the Classic
> doesn't have this (but is a nice piece of equipment).
>
> The hard drive can be attached to a Windows, Mac, or Limux computer, or to
> a network storage
> drive.
>
>
> -- Andy Barss

Thank you. Nice to get a serious answer that didn't degrade into a ****ing
contest.

Jesus, some people here need to get out and get some air.

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

May 21st 08, 11:27 PM

On May 21, 5:02*pm, "SkiFastBadly" >
wrote:

> Jesus, some people here need to get out and get some air.

2pid, I am told, gets walked twice per day.

Jenn[_2_]

May 22nd 08, 12:46 AM

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> > In article >,
> > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> >> "ScottW" > wrote in message
> >>
> >>> On May 20, 3:43 pm, Jenn
> >>> > wrote:
>
> >>>>> Nahh, Scott is just noting your ongoing love affair
> >>>>> with the Middiot.
> >>>>
> >>>> You mean the guy that I basically never post to?
> >>>
> >>> Yeah, the guy you're afraid to post to, that one.
> >>
> >> Jenn really holding the Middiot up to a reasonable
> >> standard of behavior would be like Skywalker criticizing
> >> Yoda. ;-)
> >
> > Idiotic statement.
>
> Jenn, your only value to the Middiot is how he can manipulate other's
> fascination with you to cause more hatred.

I don't claim that I have any "value" to George. I have no idea what
you're talking about.

Jenn[_2_]

May 22nd 08, 12:47 AM

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> > In article
> > >,
>
> >> So does Middiot and ****r, I think you're harmlessly
> >> obnoxious.
> >> Middiot and ****r are disgusting.
> >> Subtle distinction but one I can tolerate and the other
> >> I'd rather not have to.
> >
> > Then don't post to them.
>
> Doesn't work, Jenn. I didn't post to them for months and months, maybe more
> than a year. Didn't affect their behavior at all.

In your case, I happen to agree. But during Scott's recent hiatus, he
pretty much wasn't mentioned.

Jenn[_2_]

May 22nd 08, 12:49 AM

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> > In article >,
> > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >> .
> >> com
> >>> In article
> >>> >,
> >>> ScottW > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On May 20, 4:41 pm, George M. Middius
> >>>> > wrote:
> >>>>> Shhhh! said:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Now please don't be a hypocrite with no morals or
> >>>>>> integrity and say that this isn't 100% logical. That
> >>>>>> would obviously be absurd.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I've heard the Bible is full of "absurd" stuff. What
> >>>>> does Yapper think of that, I wonder?
> >>>>
> >>>> Obviously the christians here don't have the character
> >>>> to defend their religion.
> >>
> >>> Some Christians believe that the Bible DOES contain
> >>> absurd stuff.
> >>
> >> That's because that's what the Bible teaches,
> >
> > Which is why I wrote what I did. Duh.
> >
> >> and unlike Jenn, some
> >> Christians both know and try to follow what the Bible
> >> teaches.
> >
> > You REALLY don't want to go there, Arny.
>
> Been there, done that. Jenn, you've made no secret of how poorly you
> understand and adhere to the teachings of Christianity. You show your
> hypocrisy in other ways.

Another jerky statement by you. OK, you want to go there... How have I
shown that I poorly understand and adhere to the teachings of
Christianity? How have I shown hypocrisy? Then it will be my turn...

Jenn[_2_]

May 22nd 08, 12:50 AM

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On May 21, 9:43*am, Jenn > wrote:
> > In article
> > >,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > On May 20, 11:01*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > >,
> >
> > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > On May 20, 3:43*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > > > In article >,
> > > > > > *"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > "Jenn" > wrote in message
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > >prod
> > > > > > >igy.
> > > > > > >com
> > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > om>,
> > > > > > > > ScottW > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > >> On May 20, 12:49 pm, Jenn
> > > > > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > > > >>> In article
> > > > > > > >>> >, "Arny
> > > > > > > >>> Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > >>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
> > > > > > > >>>> message
> > > > > > > >>>>news:jennconductsREMOVETHIS-956852.12254020052008@newsclstr02.
> > > > > > > >>>>news
> > > > > > > >>>>.pro
> > > > > > > >>>>dig
> > > > > > > >>>> y.
> > > > > > > >>>> com
> > > > > > > >>>>> In article
> > > > > > > >>>>> >, "Arny
> > > > > > > >>>>> Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > >>>>>> It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing to be
> > > > > > > >>>>>> omniscient, and then play the pity card.
> >
> > > > > > > >>>>> I'm not faulting you for being "omniscient".
> >
> > > > > > > >>>> I never said you did.
> >
> > > > > > > >>> You didn't? How do you know that it's "just like me"?
> >
> > > > > > > >>>>> You took an
> > > > > > > >>>>> uneducated guess, and you were wrong.
> >
> > > > > > > >>>> No, I was being a tiny bit sarcastic.
> >
> > > > > > > >>> You should try being nice to people.
> >
> > > > > > > >>>>> And I'm not playing the "pity card".
> >
> > > > > > > >>>> Spare me!
> >
> > > > > > > >>> Why spare you from the truth?
> >
> > > > > > > >>>>> I'm pointing out what an asshole you're being.
> >
> > > > > > > >>>> How sweet of you, Jenn.
> >
> > > > > > > >>> You shouldn't pick fights if you don't want to have one.
> >
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> What's your beef with me?
> >
> > > > > > > >>>>>> Your lack of character.
> >
> > > > > > > >>>>> More being an asshole on your part.
> >
> > > > > > > >>>> No, just reflecting on readily observable facts.
> >
> > > > > > > >>> I've asked this many times before and you haven't
> > > > > > > >>> answered the question: How, in your opinion, do I show
> > > > > > > >>> lack of character?
> >
> > > > > > > >> People of character don't tolerate miscreants just
> > > > > > > >> because they aren't the brunt of their attention.
> >
> > > > > > > >> ScottW
> >
> > > > > > > > Speak to Arny, Scott. *Glass houses and all...
> >
> > > > > > > Nahh, Scott is just noting your ongoing love affair with the
> > > > > > > Middiot.
> >
> > > > > > You mean the guy that I basically never post to?
> >
> > > > > *Yeah, the guy you're afraid to post to, that one.
> >
> > > > > ScottW
> >
> > > > Are you afraid to post to Arny?
> >
> > > *Post to Arny, * Jenn seems to think you're scary.
> >
> > Huh? *lol
> >
> > > *So does Middiot and ****r, I think you're harmlessly
> > > obnoxious.
> > > *Middiot and ****r are disgusting.
> > > Subtle distinction but one I can tolerate and the other
> > > I'd rather not have to.
> >
> > Then don't post to them.
>
> That's like telling me not to walk on the beach
> to avoid the dog ****.

No, it would be like telling you to walk on the beach but avoid the dog
****.

Jenn[_2_]

May 22nd 08, 12:50 AM

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On May 21, 9:36*am, Jenn > wrote:
> > In article
> > >,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > On May 20, 11:03*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > >,
> >
> > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > On May 20, 3:57*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > > > In article
> > > > > > >,
> >
> > > > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > > > On May 20, 1:18*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > om>,
> >
> > > > > > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On May 20, 12:49*pm, Jenn >
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > In article >,
> > > > > > > > > > *"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > "Jenn" > wrote in message
> > > > > > > > > > >news:jennconductsREMOVETHIS-956852.12254020052008@newsclstr
> > > > > > > > > > >02.n
> > > > > > > > > > >ews.
> > > > > > > > > > >prod
> > > > > > > > > > >igy.
> > > > > > > > > > >com
> > > > > > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > > > > > >,
> > > > > > > > > > > > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing to be
> > > > > > > > > > > >> omniscient, and then play the pity card.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not faulting you for being "omniscient".
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > I never said you did.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > You didn't? *How do you know that it's "just like me"?
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > You took an
> > > > > > > > > > > > uneducated guess, and you were wrong.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > No, I was being a tiny bit sarcastic.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > You should try being nice to people.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > And I'm not playing the "pity card".
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > Spare me!
> >
> > > > > > > > > > Why spare you from the truth?
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > *I'm pointing out what an asshole you're being.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > How sweet of you, Jenn.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > You shouldn't pick fights if you don't want to have one.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> What's your beef with me?
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> Your lack of character.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > More being an asshole on your part.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > No, just reflecting on readily observable facts.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > I've asked this many times before and you haven't answered
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > question: *
> > > > > > > > > > How, in your opinion, do I show lack of character?
> >
> > > > > > > > > People of character don't tolerate miscreants just because
> > > > > > > > > they
> > > > > > > > > aren't the brunt of their attention.
> >
> > > > > > > > > ScottW
> >
> > > > > > > > Speak to Arny, Scott. *Glass houses and all...
> >
> > > > > > > On the scale of snot, Arny is barely a buger compared to the
> > > > > > > never ending stream that is Middiot/****R.
> >
> > > > > > > ScottW
> >
> > > > > > You give as well as you get with them. *It's between you guys.
> >
> > > > > *You smear guys everywhere giving those social misfits
> > > > > such a title.
> >
> > > > > *But this everyone for themselves mentality is hardly a
> > > > > sign of character.
> >
> > > > > ScottW
> >
> > > > Ok. *I expect you to now take on Arny on my behalf.
> >
> > > *When he just starts spamming childish insult and vulgarities,
> > > I'll be right on it.
> >
> > You're already late.
>
> Reference?
>
> ScottW

You really need examples?

George M. Middius[_4_]

May 22nd 08, 01:09 AM

Jenn said:

> I don't claim that I have any "value" to George. I have no idea what
> you're talking about.

I was thinking of parting you out to an organ bank. Any objections?

Arny Krueger

May 22nd 08, 01:15 AM

Arny Krueger

May 22nd 08, 01:15 AM

"Jenn" > wrote in message

> In article >,
> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>>
>>> In article
>>> >,
>>
>>>> So does Middiot and ****r, I think you're harmlessly
>>>> obnoxious.
>>>> Middiot and ****r are disgusting.
>>>> Subtle distinction but one I can tolerate and the other
>>>> I'd rather not have to.
>>>
>>> Then don't post to them.
>>
>> Doesn't work, Jenn. I didn't post to them for months and
>> months, maybe more than a year. Didn't affect their
>> behavior at all.

> In your case, I happen to agree. But during Scott's
> recent hiatus, he pretty much wasn't mentioned.

Scott is a lot more plain vanilla than I am.

Arny Krueger

May 22nd 08, 01:17 AM

"Jenn" > wrote in message

> In article >,
> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>>
>>> In article
>>> >, "Arny
>>> Krueger" > wrote:
>>>
>>>> "ScottW" > wrote in message
>>>>
>>>>> On May 20, 3:43 pm, Jenn
>>>>> > wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> Nahh, Scott is just noting your ongoing love affair
>>>>>>> with the Middiot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You mean the guy that I basically never post to?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, the guy you're afraid to post to, that one.
>>>>
>>>> Jenn really holding the Middiot up to a reasonable
>>>> standard of behavior would be like Skywalker
>>>> criticizing Yoda. ;-)
>>>
>>> Idiotic statement.
>>
>> Jenn, your only value to the Middiot is how he can
>> manipulate other's fascination with you to cause more
>> hatred.
>
> I don't claim that I have any "value" to George.

So what?

It's a fact that he uses you.

> I have no idea what you're talking about.

I know better than to spend much energy trying to wake you up from that life
long sleep you're in.

George M. Middius[_4_]

May 22nd 08, 01:26 AM

Arnii "I just crashed another client's computer" Krooborg finds himself
repugnant.

> Scott is a lot more plain vanilla than I am.

Indeed he is. Your color is much browner.

Arny Krueger

May 22nd 08, 01:27 AM

"Harry Lavo" > wrote in message

> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Harry Lavo" > wrote in message
>>
>>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
>>> . ..
>>>> "Harry Lavo" > wrote in message
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> You: education using MACs = foolish
>>>>
>>>> ..and unecessarily expensive.
>>>>
>>>>> musicians/engineers spending money on MACs to record
>>>>> music
>>>>
>>>> Very old school, and foolish and expensive.
>>>>
>>>> Therefore, at best false premises.
>>>>
>>>>> But by implication then: education using MACs =
>>>>> thousands upon thousands of worker-bees using word
>>>>> processing and spreadsheeting on MACx in the office.
>>>>
>>>> Irrelevant. No logical connection shown.
>>>>
>>>>> If MACs in schools wre the source of musicians using
>>>>> MACs, Arny, why is it not also the source of
>>>>> worker-bees using MACs in our offices.
>>>>
>>>> No logical connection shown.
>>>>
>>>> BTW, folks if you look at the properties of Harry's
>>>> posts, they come from a computer that is running MS
>>>> Windows.
>>>
>>> Yep, because I've got years of legacy using PC's (back
>>> in the early '80's) for business purposes....
>>
>> Well, you started out right, Harry.
>
> I started out logically, Arny, since I had a pretty good
> intuition as to what my businesses needs would be. Religous certainty had
> nothing to do with it.
>
>
>>> but if I were
>>> starting over I'd go MAC, as my daughter the multimedia
>>> editor has done,
>>
>> I see that poor critical thinking may run in the family.
>> Or maybe its a job thing. My daughter worked in a lab
>> that was run by Mac bigots.
>
>
> Ever hear of the Final Cut Pro Suite, Arny?

Sure.

> Its the standard for this kind of work.

Only in your prideful oxygen-starved brain, Harry. Even people who advocate
it (and it is a fine piece of software) admit that it *an* alternative, not
*the* only alternative.

> And it is a MAC program.

It runs fine on Intel CPUs, no?

The only thing that keeps it from running under XP or XP64 is the system
calls that it is coded with. Were its vendor not Apple computer, there would
have been a PC version of it on the market for any number of years.

>>> and my niece, and my nephew, and my
>>> sister and her husband.

> Educators, all.

Our family ran strongly to educators in the last generation. In this
generation, we are mostly scientific researchers who actually do basic
research, and not teaching.

> Again, using the standard tools of their trade, Arny.

Apples multimedia software is just some good products among many good and
excellent products. I'm surprised that Robert isn't bragging up say, Avid at
this point.

> And BTW they get them at good academic discounts...green again, Arny?

As if Apple is the only vendor that gets academic discounts. As if I
couldn't get an academic discount if so inclined.

>> Birds of a feather flock together, it seems.

> Didn't you mother ever tell you to just shut up if you
> have nothing to say, Arny?

Comments like that only happen when I strike close to home.

>>> But I've got a ton of PC
>>> software, and I upgrade my own gear, so it has been a
>>> natural evolution for me.
>
>> The point is Harry, that you don't practice what you
>> preach, again.

> What am I "preaching" Arny?

You're preaching that Apple is *it* for multimedia.

> Theirs that religiousity
> again...totally out of line with reality.

Harry, you need to study up on your there/their usage, I see. Didn't you
learn that in grade school? Or, are you regressing into your second
childhood in hold age?

>>> But I'll flat out say the MACs are better for media
>>> work,

>> The market disagrees with you Harry. Every multimedia
>> product worth its salt runs primarily on a PC these
>> days. If there are any exceptions, its because McIntosh
>> forcably keeps it from being ported to the dominant
>> platform, in a vain attempt to keep on selling their
>> overpriced software.

> Again, ever hear of Final Cut Pro, Arny? Aperture? These
> are professional standards, as well as Photoshop for the MAC.

They are fine alternatives in a crowded market.

>>> although its a lot closer than
>>> it used to be in terms of getting the work done.....but
>>> the MAC is still head and shoulders above the PC in
>>> operating system reliability.
>>
>> Nahhh. It's also way down on compatiblity with most of
>> the real world.

> I see. Dual boot is "way down on compatibility" Arny?

Its a kluge. I prefer to boot an OS that is the world's leader for
compatibility, all by itself.

> How well do PC's run MAC software, Arny. With or without
> dual boot?

Nobody cares but you, Harry. The reason why people are tricking up their
Macs to boot XP is because they *need* XP.

>> But I can see how someone who buys into High End Audio
>> hype would carry the same lack of critical thinking to
>> their computer preferences, at least their computer
>> preferences in their dreams.

> You are the one saying I have a MAC preference, not me.

I think you've got nobody fooled but yourself, Harry.

> Computers are tools, Arny, not things to worship.

Exactly.

Clyde Slick

May 22nd 08, 03:21 AM

On 21 Mai, 07:56, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 21 Mai, 07:08, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>> In article
> >>> >,
> >>> ScottW > wrote:
>
> >>>> On May 20, 4:41 pm, George M. Middius
> >>>> > wrote:
> >>>>> Shhhh! said:
>
> >>>>>> Now please don't be a hypocrite with no morals or
> >>>>>> integrity and say that this isn't 100% logical. That
> >>>>>> would obviously be absurd.
>
> >>>>> I've heard the Bible is full of "absurd" stuff. What
> >>>>> does Yapper think of that, I wonder?
>
> >>>> Obviously the christians here don't have the character
> >>>> to defend their religion.
> >>> Some Christians believe that the Bible DOES contain
> >>> absurd stuff.
> >> That's because that's what the Bible teaches, and unlike
> >> Jenn, some Christians both know and try to follow what
> >> the Bible teaches.-
> > Like such rot that dinosaurs and humans existed at the
> > same time.
>
> Got a chapter and verse for that one?
>
> Nahh, I didn't think so.-

Ok, fine,
then you agree that high end cd players
sound better than $99 cd players

Clyde Slick

May 22nd 08, 03:23 AM

On 21 Mai, 07:57, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > But you also argued that almost any $99 cd player puts
> > out perfect cd sound.
>
> Prove me wrong.-

You already did it for me.

Clyde Slick

May 22nd 08, 03:26 AM

Clyde Slick

May 22nd 08, 03:30 AM

On 21 Mai, 15:24, ScottW > wrote:
> On May 21, 9:43*am, Jenn > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article
> > >,
>
> > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > On May 20, 11:01*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > >,
>
> > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > On May 20, 3:43*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > > > In article >,
> > > > > > *"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > "Jenn" > wrote in message
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >igy.
> > > > > > >com
> > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > >,
> > > > > > > > ScottW > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > >> On May 20, 12:49 pm, Jenn
> > > > > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > > > >>> In article
> > > > > > > >>> >, "Arny
> > > > > > > >>> Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > >>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
> > > > > > > >>>> message
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >>>>.pro
> > > > > > > >>>>dig
> > > > > > > >>>> y.
> > > > > > > >>>> com
> > > > > > > >>>>> In article
> > > > > > > >>>>> >, "Arny
> > > > > > > >>>>> Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing to be
> > > > > > > >>>>>> omniscient, and then play the pity card.
>
> > > > > > > >>>>> I'm not faulting you for being "omniscient".
>
> > > > > > > >>>> I never said you did.
>
> > > > > > > >>> You didn't? How do you know that it's "just like me"?
>
> > > > > > > >>>>> You took an
> > > > > > > >>>>> uneducated guess, and you were wrong.
>
> > > > > > > >>>> No, I was being a tiny bit sarcastic.
>
> > > > > > > >>> You should try being nice to people.
>
> > > > > > > >>>>> And I'm not playing the "pity card".
>
> > > > > > > >>>> Spare me!
>
> > > > > > > >>> Why spare you from the truth?
>
> > > > > > > >>>>> I'm pointing out what an asshole you're being.
>
> > > > > > > >>>> How sweet of you, Jenn.
>
> > > > > > > >>> You shouldn't pick fights if you don't want to have one.
>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> What's your beef with me?
>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> Your lack of character.
>
> > > > > > > >>>>> More being an asshole on your part.
>
> > > > > > > >>>> No, just reflecting on readily observable facts.
>
> > > > > > > >>> I've asked this many times before and you haven't
> > > > > > > >>> answered the question: How, in your opinion, do I show
> > > > > > > >>> lack of character?
>
> > > > > > > >> People of character don't tolerate miscreants just
> > > > > > > >> because they aren't the brunt of their attention.
>
> > > > > > > >> ScottW
>
> > > > > > > > Speak to Arny, Scott. *Glass houses and all...
>
> > > > > > > Nahh, Scott is just noting your ongoing love affair with the Middiot.
>
> > > > > > You mean the guy that I basically never post to?
>
> > > > > *Yeah, the guy you're afraid to post to, that one.
>
> > > > > ScottW
>
> > > > Are you afraid to post to Arny?
>
> > > *Post to Arny, * Jenn seems to think you're scary.
>
> > Huh? *lol
>
> > > *So does Middiot and ****r, I think you're harmlessly
> > > obnoxious.
> > > *Middiot and ****r are disgusting.
> > > Subtle distinction but one I can tolerate and the other
> > > I'd rather not have to.
>
> > Then don't post to them.
>
> * That's like telling me not to walk on the beach
> to avoid the dog ****.
>
> * ScottW-

Well, you would avoid surfing off the San Diego
beaches to avoid the San Diego sharks!!!

Clyde Slick

May 22nd 08, 03:32 AM

On 21 Mai, 15:35, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:

>
> Hm. I wonder if this statement has anything to do with GOIA's well-
> known predilection for younger sex partners.

Even I wouldn't expect him
to do 60 yhear old wrinkle bags.
I'll give huim a brak here!

Clyde Slick

May 22nd 08, 03:53 AM

On 21 Mai, 20:15, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> m
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article >,
> > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
> >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> >>> In article
> >>> >,
>
> >>>> *So does Middiot and ****r, I think you're harmlessly
> >>>> obnoxious.
> >>>> *Middiot and ****r are disgusting.
> >>>> Subtle distinction but one I can tolerate and the other
> >>>> I'd rather not have to.
>
> >>> Then don't post to them.
>
> >> Doesn't work, Jenn. I didn't post to them for months and
> >> months, maybe more than a year. Didn't affect their
> >> behavior at all.
> > In your case, I happen to agree. *But during Scott's
> > recent hiatus, he pretty much wasn't mentioned.
>
> Scott is a lot more plain vanilla than I am.-

While your "Cinnamon Buns" are known for
their "Brownie Batter".

Arny Krueger

May 22nd 08, 11:30 AM

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message

> On 21 Mai, 07:56, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 21 Mai, 07:08, "Arny Krueger" >
>>> wrote:
>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
>>>> message
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> In article
>>>>> >,
>>>>> ScottW > wrote:
>>
>>>>>> On May 20, 4:41 pm, George M. Middius
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>> Shhhh! said:
>>
>>>>>>>> Now please don't be a hypocrite with no morals or
>>>>>>>> integrity and say that this isn't 100% logical.
>>>>>>>> That would obviously be absurd.
>>
>>>>>>> I've heard the Bible is full of "absurd" stuff. What
>>>>>>> does Yapper think of that, I wonder?
>>
>>>>>> Obviously the christians here don't have the
>>>>>> character to defend their religion.
>>>>> Some Christians believe that the Bible DOES contain
>>>>> absurd stuff.
>>>> That's because that's what the Bible teaches, and
>>>> unlike Jenn, some Christians both know and try to
>>>> follow what the Bible teaches.-
>>> Like such rot that dinosaurs and humans existed at the
>>> same time.
>>
>> Got a chapter and verse for that one?
>>
>> Nahh, I didn't think so.-

> Ok, fine,

Art, thanks for finally admitting that you just make up stuff and then lie
and say I said it so you can rail against it. You're just arguing with
yourself!

Arny Krueger

May 22nd 08, 11:33 AM

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message

> On 21 Mai, 15:35, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> Hm. I wonder if this statement has anything to do with
>> GOIA's well- known predilection for younger sex partners.

Actually, I prefer the appearance women my own age and older.

> Even I wouldn't expect him
> to do 60 year old wrinkle bags.

OTOH, older and still looking fine works for me.

Arny Krueger

May 22nd 08, 11:37 AM

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message

> On 21 Mai, 07:57, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:

>>> But you also argued that almost any $99 cd player puts
>>> out perfect cd sound.

>> Prove me wrong.-

> You already did it for me.

Art, you have no idea what proof is. If you hadn't seen the satellite
pictures, you'd believe all the "proofs" that the world is flat.

George M. Middius[_4_]

May 22nd 08, 11:41 AM

Clyde Slick said:

> > > But you also argued that almost any $99 cd player puts
> > > out perfect cd sound.

> > Prove me wrong.-

> You already did it for me.

Are you talking about a DBT for the taste of Michigan crap vs. Rumanian
crap?

Clyde Slick

May 22nd 08, 12:31 PM

On 22 Mai, 06:30, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 21 Mai, 07:56, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>> On 21 Mai, 07:08, "Arny Krueger" >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
> >>>> message
>
>
>
> >>>>> In article
> >>>>> >,
> >>>>> ScottW > wrote:
>
> >>>>>> On May 20, 4:41 pm, George M. Middius
> >>>>>> > wrote:
> >>>>>>> Shhhh! said:
>
> >>>>>>>> Now please don't be a hypocrite with no morals or
> >>>>>>>> integrity and say that this isn't 100% logical.
> >>>>>>>> That would obviously be absurd.
>
> >>>>>>> I've heard the Bible is full of "absurd" stuff. What
> >>>>>>> does Yapper think of that, I wonder?
>
> >>>>>> Obviously the christians here don't have the
> >>>>>> character to defend their religion.
> >>>>> Some Christians believe that the Bible DOES contain
> >>>>> absurd stuff.
> >>>> That's because that's what the Bible teaches, and
> >>>> unlike Jenn, some Christians both know and try to
> >>>> follow what the Bible teaches.-
> >>> Like such rot that dinosaurs and humans existed at the
> >>> same time.
>
> >> Got a chapter and verse for that one?
>
> >> Nahh, I didn't think so.-
> > Ok, fine,
>
> Art, thanks for finally admitting that you just make up stuff and then lie
> and say I said it so you can rail against it. You're just arguing with
> yourself!-

My relevant response was snipped, talk about lies, you are the
biggest liar there is
recocile that with your Bible based relifion.
And reconcile Genesis with real science.
we await your answer.

Clyde Slick

May 22nd 08, 12:32 PM

On 22 Mai, 06:41, George M. Middius > wrote:
> Clyde Slick said:
>

>
> Are you talking about a DBT for the taste of Michigan crap vs. Rumanian
> crap?

no, strictly for smell

Arny Krueger

May 22nd 08, 12:49 PM

"George M. Middius" > wrote in
message
> Clyde Slick said:
>
>>>> But you also argued that almost any $99 cd player puts
>>>> out perfect cd sound.
>
>>> Prove me wrong.-
>
>> You already did it for me.
>
> Are you talking about a DBT for the taste of Michigan
> crap vs. Rumanian crap?

George, is it true that your room is the only one in the adult day care
facility where the Depends lady makes deliveries of used product?

George M. Middius[_4_]

May 22nd 08, 01:12 PM

IKYABWAIBorg elbows duh-Scottie aside.

> > Are you talking about a DBT for the taste of Michigan
> > crap vs. Rumanian crap?
>
> George, is it true that your room is the only one in the adult day care
> facility where the Depends lady makes deliveries of used product?

We already know you have no shame, no wit, and no self-awareness. I've
told you that, Shushie has told you that, and many former RAOers have
told you that. Are you waiting for Jenn to tell you the same thing? I'd
encourage her to do so if it would lead to your long-delayed encounter
with a speeding bus.

Jenn, ball's in your court. Arnii's date with destiny depends on your
approbation. Tell him he's a witless ****** with no hope of redemption,
and soon Usenet will be free of the odious presence of Arnii "spooge on
my keyboard" Krooger.

Harry Lavo

May 22nd 08, 01:21 PM

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
> On 22 Mai, 06:30, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> My relevant response was snipped, talk about lies, you are the
> biggest liar there is
> recocile that with your Bible based relifion.
> And reconcile Genesis with real science.
> we await your answer.

Arny's favorite trick when the "debate" doesn't go his way.

George M. Middius[_4_]

May 22nd 08, 01:22 PM

Harry Lavo said:

> > My relevant response was snipped, talk about lies, you are the
> > biggest liar there is
> > recocile that with your Bible based relifion.
> > And reconcile Genesis with real science.
> > we await your answer.
>
> Arny's favorite trick when the "debate" doesn't go his way.

Wrong again. Tricks are magic. Arnii only believes in sciciccnnncee.

Arny Krueger

May 22nd 08, 03:02 PM

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message

>
> My relevant response was snipped, talk about lies, you
> are the biggest liar there is

No Art, I trim out as much irrelevant garbage as I can. With your replies,
that's why I often don't reply - I trimmed out everything you wrote.

> recocile that with your Bible based religion.

Where's your beef Art, besides your complete ignorance of it?

> And reconcile Genesis with real science.

Where's your beef Art, besides your complete ignorance of both the Bible and
real science?

> we await your answer.

Note the title line Art, your whole post is again irrelevant to the thread.

Jenn[_2_]

May 22nd 08, 05:14 PM

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On May 21, 4:47*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > In article >,
> > *"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > "Jenn" > wrote in message
> > .
> > >net
> > > > In article
> > > > >,
> >
> > > >> *So does Middiot and ****r, I think you're harmlessly
> > > >> obnoxious.
> > > >> *Middiot and ****r are disgusting.
> > > >> Subtle distinction but one I can tolerate and the other
> > > >> I'd rather not have to.
> >
> > > > Then don't post to them.
> >
> > > Doesn't work, Jenn. I didn't post to them for months and months, maybe
> > > more
> > > than a year. Didn't affect their behavior at all.
> >
> > In your case, I happen to agree. *But during Scott's recent hiatus, he
> > pretty much wasn't mentioned.
>
> What does pretty much wasn't mean to you?

It means that you were barely mentioned.

> I know what oblivious means to me.
> It sometimes applies to you.

Lord, I'm hurt to the core...

Jenn[_2_]

May 22nd 08, 05:16 PM

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On May 21, 4:50*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > In article
> > >,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > On May 21, 9:43*am, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > >,
> >
> > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > On May 20, 11:01*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > > > In article
> > > > > > >,
> >
> > > > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > > > On May 20, 3:43*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > > > > > In article >,
> > > > > > > > *"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > "Jenn" > wrote in message
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >ews.
> > > > > > > > >prod
> > > > > > > > >igy.
> > > > > > > > >com
> > > > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > ps.c
> > > > > > > > > > om>,
> > > > > > > > > > ScottW > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > >> On May 20, 12:49 pm, Jenn
> > > > > > > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>> In article
> > > > > > > > > >>> >, "Arny
> > > > > > > > > >>> Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > >>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
> > > > > > > > > >>>> message
> > > > > > > > > >>>>news:jennconductsREMOVETHIS-956852.12254020052008@newsclst
> > > > > > > > > >>>>r02.
> > > > > > > > > >>>>news
> > > > > > > > > >>>>.pro
> > > > > > > > > >>>>dig
> > > > > > > > > >>>> y.
> > > > > > > > > >>>> com
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> In article
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> >, "Arny
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing to be
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> omniscient, and then play the pity card.
> >
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> I'm not faulting you for being "omniscient".
> >
> > > > > > > > > >>>> I never said you did.
> >
> > > > > > > > > >>> You didn't? How do you know that it's "just like me"?
> >
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> You took an
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> uneducated guess, and you were wrong.
> >
> > > > > > > > > >>>> No, I was being a tiny bit sarcastic.
> >
> > > > > > > > > >>> You should try being nice to people.
> >
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> And I'm not playing the "pity card".
> >
> > > > > > > > > >>>> Spare me!
> >
> > > > > > > > > >>> Why spare you from the truth?
> >
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> I'm pointing out what an asshole you're being.
> >
> > > > > > > > > >>>> How sweet of you, Jenn.
> >
> > > > > > > > > >>> You shouldn't pick fights if you don't want to have one.
> >
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> What's your beef with me?
> >
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Your lack of character.
> >
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> More being an asshole on your part.
> >
> > > > > > > > > >>>> No, just reflecting on readily observable facts.
> >
> > > > > > > > > >>> I've asked this many times before and you haven't
> > > > > > > > > >>> answered the question: How, in your opinion, do I show
> > > > > > > > > >>> lack of character?
> >
> > > > > > > > > >> People of character don't tolerate miscreants just
> > > > > > > > > >> because they aren't the brunt of their attention.
> >
> > > > > > > > > >> ScottW
> >
> > > > > > > > > > Speak to Arny, Scott. *Glass houses and all...
> >
> > > > > > > > > Nahh, Scott is just noting your ongoing love affair with the
> > > > > > > > > Middiot.
> >
> > > > > > > > You mean the guy that I basically never post to?
> >
> > > > > > > *Yeah, the guy you're afraid to post to, that one.
> >
> > > > > > > ScottW
> >
> > > > > > Are you afraid to post to Arny?
> >
> > > > > *Post to Arny, * Jenn seems to think you're scary.
> >
> > > > Huh? *lol
> >
> > > > > *So does Middiot and ****r, I think you're harmlessly
> > > > > obnoxious.
> > > > > *Middiot and ****r are disgusting.
> > > > > Subtle distinction but one I can tolerate and the other
> > > > > I'd rather not have to.
> >
> > > > Then don't post to them.
> >
> > > * That's like telling me not to walk on the beach
> > > to avoid the dog ****.
> >
> > No, it would be like telling you to walk on the beach but avoid the dog
> > ****.
>
> Progress, we agree Middiot and ****r are dog ****.

No, we don't. I think that the posts between the three of you are dog
****.

> Now the question
> is how to deal with it/them.

I already offered my opinion.

Jenn[_2_]

May 22nd 08, 05:19 PM

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On May 21, 4:50*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > In article
> > >,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > On May 21, 9:36*am, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > >,
> >
> > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > On May 20, 11:03*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > > > In article
> > > > > > >,
> >
> > > > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > > > On May 20, 3:57*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > om>,
> >
> > > > > > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On May 20, 1:18*pm, Jenn >
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > ps.c
> > > > > > > > > > om>,
> >
> > > > > > > > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > On May 20, 12:49*pm, Jenn
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > > > > > >,
> > > > > > > > > > > > *"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "Jenn" > wrote in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > message
> > > > > > > > > > > > >news:jennconductsREMOVETHIS-956852.12254020052008@newsc
> > > > > > > > > > > > >lstr
> > > > > > > > > > > > >02.n
> > > > > > > > > > > > >ews.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >prod
> > > > > > > > > > > > >igy.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> It's just like you Jenn to fault me for failing to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> omniscient, and then play the pity card.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not faulting you for being "omniscient".
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I never said you did.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > You didn't? *How do you know that it's "just like me"?
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > You took an
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > uneducated guess, and you were wrong.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > No, I was being a tiny bit sarcastic.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > You should try being nice to people.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > And I'm not playing the "pity card".
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Spare me!
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Why spare you from the truth?
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > *I'm pointing out what an asshole you're being.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > How sweet of you, Jenn.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > You shouldn't pick fights if you don't want to have
> > > > > > > > > > > > one.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> What's your beef with me?
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Your lack of character.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > More being an asshole on your part.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > No, just reflecting on readily observable facts.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I've asked this many times before and you haven't
> > > > > > > > > > > > answered
> > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > question: *
> > > > > > > > > > > > How, in your opinion, do I show lack of character?
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > People of character don't tolerate miscreants just
> > > > > > > > > > > because
> > > > > > > > > > > they
> > > > > > > > > > > aren't the brunt of their attention.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > ScottW
> >
> > > > > > > > > > Speak to Arny, Scott. *Glass houses and all...
> >
> > > > > > > > > On the scale of snot, Arny is barely a buger compared to the
> > > > > > > > > never ending stream that is Middiot/****R.
> >
> > > > > > > > > ScottW
> >
> > > > > > > > You give as well as you get with them. *It's between you guys.
> >
> > > > > > > *You smear guys everywhere giving those social misfits
> > > > > > > such a title.
> >
> > > > > > > *But this everyone for themselves mentality is hardly a
> > > > > > > sign of character.
> >
> > > > > > > ScottW
> >
> > > > > > Ok. *I expect you to now take on Arny on my behalf.
> >
> > > > > *When he just starts spamming childish insult and vulgarities,
> > > > > I'll be right on it.
> >
> > > > You're already late.
> >
> > > * Reference?
> >
> > > ScottW
> >
> > You really need examples?
>
> Should be easy to provide. Not simple disagreements or even
> inuendo but the
> seriously grade school crap of Middiot and Ssshhhie.

Should be easy for you to recognize.

>
> My gut feel is your level of sensitivity is extremely high
> when it's about you.

"At least" that's really different than you, right?

Jenn[_2_]

May 22nd 08, 05:30 PM

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> > In article >,
> > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >> .
> >> net
> >>> In article
> >>> >, "Arny
> >>> Krueger" > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
> >>>> message
> >>>>
> >>>> y.
> >>>> com
> >>>>> In article
> >>>>> >,
> >>>>> ScottW > wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On May 20, 4:41 pm, George M. Middius
> >>>>>> > wrote:
> >>>>>>> Shhhh! said:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Now please don't be a hypocrite with no morals or
> >>>>>>>> integrity and say that this isn't 100% logical.
> >>>>>>>> That would obviously be absurd.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I've heard the Bible is full of "absurd" stuff. What
> >>>>>>> does Yapper think of that, I wonder?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Obviously the christians here don't have the
> >>>>>> character to defend their religion.
> >>>>
> >>>>> Some Christians believe that the Bible DOES contain
> >>>>> absurd stuff.
> >>>>
> >>>> That's because that's what the Bible teaches,
> >>>
> >>> Which is why I wrote what I did. Duh.
> >>>
> >>>> and unlike Jenn, some
> >>>> Christians both know and try to follow what the Bible
> >>>> teaches.
> >>>
> >>> You REALLY don't want to go there, Arny.
> >>
> >> Been there, done that. Jenn, you've made no secret of
> >> how poorly you understand and adhere to the teachings of
> >> Christianity. You show your hypocrisy in other ways.
> >
> > Another jerky statement by you. OK, you want to go
> > there... How have I shown that I poorly understand and
> > adhere to the teachings of Christianity? How have I
> > shown hypocrisy? Then it will be my turn...
>
> I've explained the hypocrisy thing until I was blue in the face, and then I
> realized that I was arguing against your will not your reason. I won't make
> that mistake again with a discussion of Christianity.

As expected, once again you can't back up your statements about me. No
Arny, you've never explained a thing. EVERY time you make a statement
about my character and are pressed to back it up, you give this type of
response. EVERY time. For example, you've accused me of lying, but
when asked to show even one lie, you don't. You simply say that you
have, but you haven't. Here's the predictable next step: I ask you to
show where you've "explained the hypocrisy thing", and you say that you
can't be bothered, or some other excuse in an effort to avoid actually
answering the question. If you're going to make serious charges about a
person's character, the least you can do, if you have integrity, is to
back it up.

Arny Krueger

May 22nd 08, 07:01 PM

"Jenn" > wrote in message

> In article >,
> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>>
>>> In article
>>> >, "Arny
>>> Krueger" > wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
>>>> message
>>>> .
>>>> net
>>>>> In article
>>>>> >, "Arny
>>>>> Krueger" > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
>>>>>> message
>>>>>>
>>>>>> y.
>>>>>> com
>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>> >,
>>>>>>> ScottW > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On May 20, 4:41 pm, George M. Middius
>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Shhhh! said:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Now please don't be a hypocrite with no morals or
>>>>>>>>>> integrity and say that this isn't 100% logical.
>>>>>>>>>> That would obviously be absurd.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I've heard the Bible is full of "absurd" stuff.
>>>>>>>>> What does Yapper think of that, I wonder?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Obviously the christians here don't have the
>>>>>>>> character to defend their religion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Some Christians believe that the Bible DOES contain
>>>>>>> absurd stuff.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's because that's what the Bible teaches,
>>>>>
>>>>> Which is why I wrote what I did. Duh.
>>>>>
>>>>>> and unlike Jenn, some
>>>>>> Christians both know and try to follow what the Bible
>>>>>> teaches.
>>>>>
>>>>> You REALLY don't want to go there, Arny.
>>>>
>>>> Been there, done that. Jenn, you've made no secret of
>>>> how poorly you understand and adhere to the teachings
>>>> of Christianity. You show your hypocrisy in other ways.
>>>
>>> Another jerky statement by you. OK, you want to go
>>> there... How have I shown that I poorly understand and
>>> adhere to the teachings of Christianity? How have I
>>> shown hypocrisy? Then it will be my turn...
>>
>> I've explained the hypocrisy thing until I was blue in
>> the face, and then I realized that I was arguing against
>> your will not your reason. I won't make that mistake
>> again with a discussion of Christianity.
>
> As expected, once again you can't back up your statements
> about me.

Not at all. I'm all too aware, based on years of experience, of your
inability to comprehend your own weaknesses and failings, Jenn.

>No Arny, you've never explained a thing.

That's a lie, but lie on, little sister.

> EVERY time you make a statement about my character and
> are pressed to back it up, you give this type of
> response.

Nope, only since I learned about the futility of exlaining things to you
that you don't want to understand.

> EVERY time. For example, you've accused me of
> lying, but when asked to show even one lie, you don't.

Actually, I've explained a number of them in great detail, and watched you
blow the explanations off.

> You simply say that you have, but you haven't.

I've even quoted them from google when you said that they never happened.

> Here's
> the predictable next step: I ask you to show where
> you've "explained the hypocrisy thing", and you say that
> you can't be bothered, or some other excuse in an effort
> to avoid actually answering the question.

No excuses, just facts.

> If you're
> going to make serious charges about a person's character,
> the least you can do, if you have integrity, is to back it up.

Been there, done that.

BTW Jern, you just played your stupid act again when called for your slur
about the professionalism of the technical folk at the Idol final.

Teflon Jenn rides again. :-(

No Name

May 22nd 08, 07:08 PM

"SkiFastBadly" > wrote in message
...
> Yeah, I googled and came up with nothing.
>
> Is there a device onto which I can load my CDS (the music, not the discs),
> which will hold the data as WAV, not mp3, which will act as a virtual CD
> player, meaning it will send a signal out to my pre-amp, which has
> wireless capability to go out to the internet to determine what CDs I'm
> loading, and will provide an easy UI that allows me to select CDs to play
> OR will play random cuts? And which will hold 500+ CDs?

NewEgg has a 500GB external hard drive for sale: $80, delivered. This
drive will hold over 700 CDs, uncompressed. If you store them as FLAC
files, you can probably up the number to 1000 CDs. All you need is a cheap
laptop with a 48x CD drive and a USB 2.0 connection to play your entire
collection.

Norm Strong

Jenn[_2_]

May 22nd 08, 08:47 PM

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> > In article >,
> > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >> .
> >> com
> >>> In article
> >>> >, "Arny
> >>> Krueger" > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
> >>>> message
> >>>>
> >>>> y.
> >>>> net
> >>>>> In article
> >>>>> >, "Arny
> >>>>> Krueger" > wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
> >>>>>> message
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ig
> >>>>>> y.
> >>>>>> com
> >>>>>>> In article
> >>>>>>> >,
> >>>>>>> ScottW > wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On May 20, 4:41 pm, George M. Middius
> >>>>>>>> > wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Shhhh! said:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Now please don't be a hypocrite with no morals or
> >>>>>>>>>> integrity and say that this isn't 100% logical.
> >>>>>>>>>> That would obviously be absurd.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I've heard the Bible is full of "absurd" stuff.
> >>>>>>>>> What does Yapper think of that, I wonder?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Obviously the christians here don't have the
> >>>>>>>> character to defend their religion.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Some Christians believe that the Bible DOES contain
> >>>>>>> absurd stuff.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> That's because that's what the Bible teaches,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Which is why I wrote what I did. Duh.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> and unlike Jenn, some
> >>>>>> Christians both know and try to follow what the Bible
> >>>>>> teaches.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You REALLY don't want to go there, Arny.
> >>>>
> >>>> Been there, done that. Jenn, you've made no secret of
> >>>> how poorly you understand and adhere to the teachings
> >>>> of Christianity. You show your hypocrisy in other ways.
> >>>
> >>> Another jerky statement by you. OK, you want to go
> >>> there... How have I shown that I poorly understand and
> >>> adhere to the teachings of Christianity? How have I
> >>> shown hypocrisy? Then it will be my turn...
> >>
> >> I've explained the hypocrisy thing until I was blue in
> >> the face, and then I realized that I was arguing against
> >> your will not your reason. I won't make that mistake
> >> again with a discussion of Christianity.
> >
> > As expected, once again you can't back up your statements
> > about me.
>
> Not at all. I'm all too aware, based on years of experience, of your
> inability to comprehend your own weaknesses and failings, Jenn.
>
> >No Arny, you've never explained a thing.
>
> That's a lie, but lie on, little sister.
>
> > EVERY time you make a statement about my character and
> > are pressed to back it up, you give this type of
> > response.
>
> Nope, only since I learned about the futility of exlaining things to you
> that you don't want to understand.
>
> > EVERY time. For example, you've accused me of
> > lying, but when asked to show even one lie, you don't.
>
> Actually, I've explained a number of them in great detail, and watched you
> blow the explanations off.
>
> > You simply say that you have, but you haven't.
>
> I've even quoted them from google when you said that they never happened.
>
> > Here's
> > the predictable next step: I ask you to show where
> > you've "explained the hypocrisy thing", and you say that
> > you can't be bothered, or some other excuse in an effort
> > to avoid actually answering the question.
>
> No excuses, just facts.
>
> > If you're
> > going to make serious charges about a person's character,
> > the least you can do, if you have integrity, is to back it up.
>
> Been there, done that.
>
> BTW Jern, you just played your stupid act again when called for your slur
> about the professionalism of the technical folk at the Idol final.
>
> Teflon Jenn rides again. :-(

So here it is again for everyone to read, as predicted. You SAY you've
backed up your statements, but provide no evidence of it. You won't do
that, because you CAN'T do it. You SAY you've quoted in detail, but you
haven't, because you can't. You SAY that you've done these things, but
there is no evidence of it, because you CAN'T do it. We now have yet
another record of your lack of integrity.

Arny Krueger

May 22nd 08, 09:04 PM

"Jenn" > wrote in message

> In article >,
> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>>
>>> In article
>>> >, "Arny
>>> Krueger" > wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
>>>> message
>>>> .
>>>> com
>>>>> In article
>>>>> >, "Arny
>>>>> Krueger" > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
>>>>>> message
>>>>>>
>>>>>> y.
>>>>>> net
>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>> >,
>>>>>>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ig
>>>>>>>> y.
>>>>>>>> com
>>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>>> >,
>>>>>>>>> ScottW > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On May 20, 4:41 pm, George M. Middius
>>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Shhhh! said:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Now please don't be a hypocrite with no morals
>>>>>>>>>>>> or integrity and say that this isn't 100%
>>>>>>>>>>>> logical. That would obviously be absurd.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I've heard the Bible is full of "absurd" stuff.
>>>>>>>>>>> What does Yapper think of that, I wonder?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Obviously the christians here don't have the
>>>>>>>>>> character to defend their religion.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Some Christians believe that the Bible DOES
>>>>>>>>> contain absurd stuff.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's because that's what the Bible teaches,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Which is why I wrote what I did. Duh.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> and unlike Jenn, some
>>>>>>>> Christians both know and try to follow what the
>>>>>>>> Bible teaches.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You REALLY don't want to go there, Arny.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Been there, done that. Jenn, you've made no secret of
>>>>>> how poorly you understand and adhere to the teachings
>>>>>> of Christianity. You show your hypocrisy in other
>>>>>> ways.
>>>>>
>>>>> Another jerky statement by you. OK, you want to go
>>>>> there... How have I shown that I poorly understand and
>>>>> adhere to the teachings of Christianity? How have I
>>>>> shown hypocrisy? Then it will be my turn...
>>>>
>>>> I've explained the hypocrisy thing until I was blue in
>>>> the face, and then I realized that I was arguing
>>>> against your will not your reason. I won't make that
>>>> mistake again with a discussion of Christianity.
>>>
>>> As expected, once again you can't back up your
>>> statements about me.
>>
>> Not at all. I'm all too aware, based on years of
>> experience, of your inability to comprehend your own
>> weaknesses and failings, Jenn.
>>
>>> No Arny, you've never explained a thing.
>>
>> That's a lie, but lie on, little sister.
>>
>>> EVERY time you make a statement about my character and
>>> are pressed to back it up, you give this type of
>>> response.
>>
>> Nope, only since I learned about the futility of
>> exlaining things to you that you don't want to
>> understand.
>>
>>> EVERY time. For example, you've accused me of
>>> lying, but when asked to show even one lie, you don't.
>>
>> Actually, I've explained a number of them in great
>> detail, and watched you blow the explanations off.
>>
>>> You simply say that you have, but you haven't.
>>
>> I've even quoted them from google when you said that
>> they never happened.
>>
>>> Here's
>>> the predictable next step: I ask you to show where
>>> you've "explained the hypocrisy thing", and you say that
>>> you can't be bothered, or some other excuse in an effort
>>> to avoid actually answering the question.
>>
>> No excuses, just facts.
>>
>>> If you're
>>> going to make serious charges about a person's
>>> character,
>>> the least you can do, if you have integrity, is to back
>>> it up.
>>
>> Been there, done that.
>>
>> BTW Jern, you just played your stupid act again when
>> called for your slur about the professionalism of the
>> technical folk at the Idol final.
>>
>> Teflon Jenn rides again. :-(
>
> So here it is again for everyone to read, as predicted.
> You SAY you've backed up your statements, but provide no
> evidence of it.

Been there, done that to no avail.

> You won't do that, because you CAN'T do it.

Jenn, what you're doing is the equivalent of a cute lesbian picking up a guy
at a bar. Ever do that in real life?

Jenn[_2_]

May 22nd 08, 09:21 PM

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> > In article >,
> > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >> .
> >> com
> >>> In article
> >>> >, "Arny
> >>> Krueger" > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
> >>>> message
> >>>>
> >>>> y.
> >>>> com
> >>>>> In article
> >>>>> >, "Arny
> >>>>> Krueger" > wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
> >>>>>> message
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ig
> >>>>>> y.
> >>>>>> net
> >>>>>>> In article
> >>>>>>> >,
> >>>>>>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
> >>>>>>>> message
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> od
> >>>>>>>> ig
> >>>>>>>> y.
> >>>>>>>> com
> >>>>>>>>> In article
> >>>>>>>>> >,
> >>>>>>>>> ScottW > wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On May 20, 4:41 pm, George M. Middius
> >>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Shhhh! said:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Now please don't be a hypocrite with no morals
> >>>>>>>>>>>> or integrity and say that this isn't 100%
> >>>>>>>>>>>> logical. That would obviously be absurd.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I've heard the Bible is full of "absurd" stuff.
> >>>>>>>>>>> What does Yapper think of that, I wonder?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Obviously the christians here don't have the
> >>>>>>>>>> character to defend their religion.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Some Christians believe that the Bible DOES
> >>>>>>>>> contain absurd stuff.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> That's because that's what the Bible teaches,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Which is why I wrote what I did. Duh.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> and unlike Jenn, some
> >>>>>>>> Christians both know and try to follow what the
> >>>>>>>> Bible teaches.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> You REALLY don't want to go there, Arny.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Been there, done that. Jenn, you've made no secret of
> >>>>>> how poorly you understand and adhere to the teachings
> >>>>>> of Christianity. You show your hypocrisy in other
> >>>>>> ways.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Another jerky statement by you. OK, you want to go
> >>>>> there... How have I shown that I poorly understand and
> >>>>> adhere to the teachings of Christianity? How have I
> >>>>> shown hypocrisy? Then it will be my turn...
> >>>>
> >>>> I've explained the hypocrisy thing until I was blue in
> >>>> the face, and then I realized that I was arguing
> >>>> against your will not your reason. I won't make that
> >>>> mistake again with a discussion of Christianity.
> >>>
> >>> As expected, once again you can't back up your
> >>> statements about me.
> >>
> >> Not at all. I'm all too aware, based on years of
> >> experience, of your inability to comprehend your own
> >> weaknesses and failings, Jenn.
> >>
> >>> No Arny, you've never explained a thing.
> >>
> >> That's a lie, but lie on, little sister.
> >>
> >>> EVERY time you make a statement about my character and
> >>> are pressed to back it up, you give this type of
> >>> response.
> >>
> >> Nope, only since I learned about the futility of
> >> exlaining things to you that you don't want to
> >> understand.
> >>
> >>> EVERY time. For example, you've accused me of
> >>> lying, but when asked to show even one lie, you don't.
> >>
> >> Actually, I've explained a number of them in great
> >> detail, and watched you blow the explanations off.
> >>
> >>> You simply say that you have, but you haven't.
> >>
> >> I've even quoted them from google when you said that
> >> they never happened.
> >>
> >>> Here's
> >>> the predictable next step: I ask you to show where
> >>> you've "explained the hypocrisy thing", and you say that
> >>> you can't be bothered, or some other excuse in an effort
> >>> to avoid actually answering the question.
> >>
> >> No excuses, just facts.
> >>
> >>> If you're
> >>> going to make serious charges about a person's
> >>> character,
> >>> the least you can do, if you have integrity, is to back
> >>> it up.
> >>
> >> Been there, done that.
> >>
> >> BTW Jern, you just played your stupid act again when
> >> called for your slur about the professionalism of the
> >> technical folk at the Idol final.
> >>
> >> Teflon Jenn rides again. :-(
> >
> > So here it is again for everyone to read, as predicted.
> > You SAY you've backed up your statements, but provide no
> > evidence of it.
>
> Been there, done that to no avail.

And there it is AGAIN. Drop the shovel, Arny.

>
> > You won't do that, because you CAN'T do it.
>
> Jenn, what you're doing is the equivalent of a cute lesbian picking up a guy
> at a bar. Ever do that in real life?

lol I generally don't go to bars.

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

May 22nd 08, 09:23 PM

On May 21, 7:49*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On May 21, 4:50*pm, Jenn > wrote:

> > In article
> > >,
>
> > *ScottW > wrote:

> > > * That's like telling me not to walk on the beach
> > > to avoid the dog ****.
>
> > No, it would be like telling you to walk on the beach but avoid the dog
> > ****.
>
> *Progress, we agree Middiot and ****r are dog ****. *Now the question
> is how to deal with it/them.

I'll bet you still can't see why people think you're really stupid,
2pid.

Lol

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

May 22nd 08, 09:23 PM

On May 21, 7:54*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On May 21, 4:47*pm, Jenn > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article >,
> > *"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > > "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >
> > > > In article
> > > > >,
>
> > > >> *So does Middiot and ****r, I think you're harmlessly
> > > >> obnoxious.
> > > >> *Middiot and ****r are disgusting.
> > > >> Subtle distinction but one I can tolerate and the other
> > > >> I'd rather not have to.
>
> > > > Then don't post to them.
>
> > > Doesn't work, Jenn. I didn't post to them for months and months, maybe more
> > > than a year. Didn't affect their behavior at all.
>
> > In your case, I happen to agree. *But during Scott's recent hiatus, he
> > pretty much wasn't mentioned.
>
> *What does pretty much wasn't mean to you?

It means that when you're gone, you're not missed.

> *I know what oblivious means to me.
> *It sometimes applies to you.

Duh.

Lol

George M. Middius[_4_]

May 22nd 08, 09:37 PM

Jenn said:

> > >>>> how poorly you understand and adhere to the teachings of Christianity.

> > >>> How have I shown that I poorly understand and
> > >>> adhere to the teachings of Christianity? .... Then it will be my turn...

[...]

> So here it is again for everyone to read, as predicted. You SAY you've
> backed up your statements, but provide no evidence of it. You won't do
> that, because you CAN'T do it. You SAY you've quoted in detail, but you
> haven't, because you can't. You SAY that you've done these things, but
> there is no evidence of it, because you CAN'T do it. We now have yet
> another record of your lack of integrity.

It's been a while on RAO since a self-declared christian who isn't
insane took Arnii to task for his fatuosity. You gave Turdy a chance to
list your transgressions of faith, and in your judgment, he failed. So
now how about pointing out, for the benefit of us non-believers, your
views on Krooger's adherence to the tenets of his professed faith?

Jenn[_2_]

May 22nd 08, 09:50 PM

In article >,
George M. Middius > wrote:

> Jenn said:
>
> > > >>>> how poorly you understand and adhere to the teachings of
> > > >>>> Christianity.
>
> > > >>> How have I shown that I poorly understand and
> > > >>> adhere to the teachings of Christianity? .... Then it will be my
> > > >>> turn...
>
> [...]
>
> > So here it is again for everyone to read, as predicted. You SAY you've
> > backed up your statements, but provide no evidence of it. You won't do
> > that, because you CAN'T do it. You SAY you've quoted in detail, but you
> > haven't, because you can't. You SAY that you've done these things, but
> > there is no evidence of it, because you CAN'T do it. We now have yet
> > another record of your lack of integrity.
>
> It's been a while on RAO since a self-declared christian who isn't
> insane took Arnii to task for his fatuosity. You gave Turdy a chance to
> list your transgressions of faith, and in your judgment, he failed. So
> now how about pointing out, for the benefit of us non-believers, your
> views on Krooger's adherence to the tenets of his professed faith?

I believe that one's practice of his/her faith is (or should be) a very
personal thing. It's not for me to judge, IMO.

George M. Middius[_4_]

May 22nd 08, 09:57 PM

Jenn said:

> > > > >>> How have I shown that I poorly understand and
> > > > >>> adhere to the teachings of Christianity? .... Then it will be my
> > > > >>> turn...

[...]

> > It's been a while on RAO since a self-declared christian who isn't
> > insane took Arnii to task for his fatuosity. You gave Turdy a chance to
> > list your transgressions of faith, and in your judgment, he failed. So
> > now how about pointing out, for the benefit of us non-believers, your
> > views on Krooger's adherence to the tenets of his professed faith?
>
> I believe that one's practice of his/her faith is (or should be) a very
> personal thing. It's not for me to judge, IMO.

So what did you mean by "my turn"?

George M. Middius[_4_]

May 22nd 08, 10:00 PM

The sermon is cancelled. In its place, our guest mutt will scratch
himself in embarrassing places.

> > > It's been a while on RAO since a self-declared christian who isn't
> > > insane took Arnii to task for his fatuosity. You gave Turdy a chance to
> > > list your transgressions of faith, and in your judgment, he failed. So
> > > now how about pointing out, for the benefit of us non-believers, your
> > > views on Krooger's adherence to the tenets of his professed faith?
> >
> > I believe that one's practice of his/her faith is (or should be) a very
> > personal thing. *It's not for me to judge, IMO.
>
> [George the Great] will do it for you. Never mind
that in the process
> your
> faith
> is ridiculed.

Scottie, I wasn't trying to offend you. It's Krooger who is the worst
example of a good "christian" I've ever seen. But if you have an opinion
on the matter of Mr. ****'s adherence, please share it.

Arny Krueger

May 22nd 08, 10:10 PM

"ScottW" > wrote in message

> On May 22, 1:50 pm, Jenn >
> wrote:

>> I believe that one's practice of his/her faith is (or
>> should be) a very personal thing. It's not for me to
>> judge, IMO.

> Middiot will do it for you.

And Jenn just sits there and approves of what he does with her silence.

By being silent, she has him to do her dirty work for her, and spare her the
usual Middiiot treatment.

> Never mind that in the process your faith is ridiculed.

The Middiot is incapable of intelligent conversation. Everything is
rediculed except for his posse members like Marc, Art, and Jenn.

Art and Marc are about equally stupid (sub-carrot IQ) and every so often
they blunder into criticizing the Middiot, as Marc did today.

Arny Krueger

May 22nd 08, 10:11 PM

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" >
wrote in message

> On May 21, 7:49 pm, ScottW > wrote:
>> On May 21, 4:50 pm, Jenn
>> > wrote:
>
>>> In article
>>> >,
>>
>>> ScottW > wrote:
>
>>>> That's like telling me not to walk on the beach
>>>> to avoid the dog ****.
>>
>>> No, it would be like telling you to walk on the beach
>>> but avoid the dog ****.
>>
>> Progress, we agree Middiot and ****r are dog ****. Now
>> the question is how to deal with it/them.
>
> I'll bet you still can't see why people think you're
> really stupid, 2pid.

Hmm, and here we have ****R playing mean girl from high school, just like
Robert was doing yesterday.

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

May 22nd 08, 10:14 PM

On May 22, 3:53*pm, ScottW > wrote:

> *Never mind that in the process your
> faith is ridiculed.

Thank god Jenn isn't a Muslim, right, 2pid?

Harry Lavo

May 22nd 08, 11:30 PM

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
. ..
> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
>> In article >,
>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>>
>>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>>>
>>>> In article
>>>> >, "Arny
>>>> Krueger" > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
>>>>> message
>>>>> .
>>>>> net
>>>>>> In article
>>>>>> >, "Arny
>>>>>> Krueger" > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> y.
>>>>>>> com
>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>> >,
>>>>>>>> ScottW > wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On May 20, 4:41 pm, George M. Middius
>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Shhhh! said:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Now please don't be a hypocrite with no morals or
>>>>>>>>>>> integrity and say that this isn't 100% logical.
>>>>>>>>>>> That would obviously be absurd.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I've heard the Bible is full of "absurd" stuff.
>>>>>>>>>> What does Yapper think of that, I wonder?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Obviously the christians here don't have the
>>>>>>>>> character to defend their religion.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Some Christians believe that the Bible DOES contain
>>>>>>>> absurd stuff.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's because that's what the Bible teaches,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which is why I wrote what I did. Duh.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and unlike Jenn, some
>>>>>>> Christians both know and try to follow what the Bible
>>>>>>> teaches.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You REALLY don't want to go there, Arny.
>>>>>
>>>>> Been there, done that. Jenn, you've made no secret of
>>>>> how poorly you understand and adhere to the teachings
>>>>> of Christianity. You show your hypocrisy in other ways.
>>>>
>>>> Another jerky statement by you. OK, you want to go
>>>> there... How have I shown that I poorly understand and
>>>> adhere to the teachings of Christianity? How have I
>>>> shown hypocrisy? Then it will be my turn...
>>>
>>> I've explained the hypocrisy thing until I was blue in
>>> the face, and then I realized that I was arguing against
>>> your will not your reason. I won't make that mistake
>>> again with a discussion of Christianity.
>>
>> As expected, once again you can't back up your statements
>> about me.
>
> Not at all. I'm all too aware, based on years of experience, of your
> inability to comprehend your own weaknesses and failings, Jenn.
>
>>No Arny, you've never explained a thing.
>
> That's a lie, but lie on, little sister.
>
>> EVERY time you make a statement about my character and
>> are pressed to back it up, you give this type of
>> response.
>
> Nope, only since I learned about the futility of exlaining things to you
> that you don't want to understand.
>
>> EVERY time. For example, you've accused me of
>> lying, but when asked to show even one lie, you don't.
>
> Actually, I've explained a number of them in great detail, and watched you
> blow the explanations off.
>
>> You simply say that you have, but you haven't.
>
> I've even quoted them from google when you said that they never happened.
>
>> Here's
>> the predictable next step: I ask you to show where
>> you've "explained the hypocrisy thing", and you say that
>> you can't be bothered, or some other excuse in an effort
>> to avoid actually answering the question.
>
> No excuses, just facts.
>
>> If you're
>> going to make serious charges about a person's character,
>> the least you can do, if you have integrity, is to back it up.
>
> Been there, done that.
>
> BTW Jern, you just played your stupid act again when called for your slur
> about the professionalism of the technical folk at the Idol final.
>
> Teflon Jenn rides again. :-(

The fact is Arny that your response to Jenn here is a total pack of lies.
You REALLY don't know the difference from truth, do you?

Harry Lavo

May 22nd 08, 11:37 PM

> wrote in message
. ..
>
> "SkiFastBadly" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Yeah, I googled and came up with nothing.
>>
>> Is there a device onto which I can load my CDS (the music, not the
>> discs), which will hold the data as WAV, not mp3, which will act as a
>> virtual CD player, meaning it will send a signal out to my pre-amp, which
>> has wireless capability to go out to the internet to determine what CDs
>> I'm loading, and will provide an easy UI that allows me to select CDs to
>> play OR will play random cuts? And which will hold 500+ CDs?
>
> NewEgg has a 500GB external hard drive for sale: $80, delivered. This
> drive will hold over 700 CDs, uncompressed. If you store them as FLAC
> files, you can probably up the number to 1000 CDs. All you need is a
> cheap laptop with a 48x CD drive and a USB 2.0 connection to play your
> entire collection.
>
> Norm Strong

I can vouch for that. I took delivery of two of them this week. They will
replace my 160k mirrored HD's for photo storage with 500k of mirrored
storage. And they cost about teh same as the 160K's did two years ago.
Can't beat that. This vertical magnetization is another example of the
technology curve. Ten years ago most corporations were hard pressed to by a
Terrabyte of storage, with a mirrored backup. Now here we are with half
that on our personal computers. You can buy an external 2 Terabyte (1
Terabyte mirrored) HD for about $430.

Sometimes technology IS wonderful (and sometimes it ain't, so don't get
excited, Arny).

George M. Middius[_4_]

May 23rd 08, 12:02 AM

Harry Lavo said:

> > BTW Jern, you just played your stupid act again when called for your slur
> > about the professionalism of the technical folk at the Idol final.

> The fact is Arny that your response to Jenn here is a total pack of lies.
> You REALLY don't know the difference from truth, do you?

Ha! Turdy caught you in his carefully laid trap, Harry. You will note
that Mr. **** said "Jern". Since there's no such person, his accusation
about a "stupid act" is irrelavant™ and immaterial.

Arnii Krooger racks up another "debating trade" point. ;-)

John Atkinson[_2_]

May 23rd 08, 12:30 AM

On May 22, 3:47 pm, Jenn > wrote:
> So here it is again for everyone to read, as predicted. You SAY you've
> backed up your statements, but provide no evidence of it. You won't do
> that, because you CAN'T do it. You SAY you've quoted in detail, but you
> haven't, because you can't. You SAY that you've done these things, but
> there is no evidence of it, because you CAN'T do it. We now have yet
> another record of your lack of integrity.

A long long record, Jenn. But it makes no difference
to Mr. Krueger. All he seeks is attention and once
again he has suckered someone who has better
things to do with her time to giving him that
attention. Listen to something like Eric Whitacre's
Lux Aurumque or Vaughan Williams' Flos Campi
or Serenade to Music and put the narcissistic
Mr. Krueger out of your mind. Reflect on the fact
that you only encounter him occasionally but he
has to be with himself 100% of the time. :-)

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile

Jenn[_2_]

May 23rd 08, 03:01 AM

In article >,
George M. Middius > wrote:

> Jenn said:
>
> > > > > >>> How have I shown that I poorly understand and
> > > > > >>> adhere to the teachings of Christianity? .... Then it will be my
> > > > > >>> turn...
>
> [...]
>
> > > It's been a while on RAO since a self-declared christian who isn't
> > > insane took Arnii to task for his fatuosity. You gave Turdy a chance to
> > > list your transgressions of faith, and in your judgment, he failed. So
> > > now how about pointing out, for the benefit of us non-believers, your
> > > views on Krooger's adherence to the tenets of his professed faith?
> >
> > I believe that one's practice of his/her faith is (or should be) a very
> > personal thing. It's not for me to judge, IMO.
>
> So what did you mean by "my turn"?

My turn to defend myself.

Jenn[_2_]

May 23rd 08, 03:02 AM

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On May 22, 1:50*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > In article >,
> > *George M. Middius > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > Jenn said:
> >
> > > > > >>>> how poorly you understand and adhere to the teachings of
> > > > > >>>> Christianity.
> >
> > > > > >>> How have I shown that I poorly understand and
> > > > > >>> adhere to the teachings of Christianity? *.... Then it will be my
> > > > > >>> turn...
> >
> > > [...]
> >
> > > > So here it is again for everyone to read, as predicted. *You SAY you've
> > > > backed up your statements, but provide no evidence of it. *You won't do
> > > > that, because you CAN'T do it. *You SAY you've quoted in detail, but you
> > > > haven't, because you can't. *You SAY that you've done these things, but
> > > > there is no evidence of it, because you CAN'T do it. *We now have yet
> > > > another record of your lack of integrity.
> >
> > > It's been a while on RAO since a self-declared christian who isn't
> > > insane took Arnii to task for his fatuosity. You gave Turdy a chance to
> > > list your transgressions of faith, and in your judgment, he failed. So
> > > now how about pointing out, for the benefit of us non-believers, your
> > > views on Krooger's adherence to the tenets of his professed faith?
> >
> > I believe that one's practice of his/her faith is (or should be) a very
> > personal thing. *It's not for me to judge, IMO.
>
> Middiot will do it for you. Never mind that in the process your
> faith
> is ridiculed.

People's faith is ridiculed every day. If one is secure in her/his
beliefs, it doesn't matter much.

George M. Middius[_4_]

May 23rd 08, 03:06 AM

Jenn said:

> > > > It's been a while on RAO since a self-declared christian who isn't
> > > > insane took Arnii to task for his fatuosity. You gave Turdy a chance to
> > > > list your transgressions of faith, and in your judgment, he failed. So
> > > > now how about pointing out, for the benefit of us non-believers, your
> > > > views on Krooger's adherence to the tenets of his professed faith?
> > >
> > > I believe that one's practice of his/her faith is (or should be) a very
> > > personal thing. It's not for me to judge, IMO.
> >
> > So what did you mean by "my turn"?
>
> My turn to defend myself.

How boring. Wouldn't you rather ream out Turdy for his anti-christian
behavior? That's what Rev. Adams used to do, and we all ate it up.

George M. Middius[_4_]

May 23rd 08, 03:07 AM

Jenn said:

> People's faith is ridiculed every day. If one is secure in her/his
> beliefs, it doesn't matter much.

Even if one is insane?

Jenn[_2_]

May 23rd 08, 03:12 AM

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "ScottW" > wrote in message
>
> > On May 22, 1:50 pm, Jenn >
> > wrote:
>
> >> I believe that one's practice of his/her faith is (or
> >> should be) a very personal thing. It's not for me to
> >> judge, IMO.
>
> > Middiot will do it for you.
>
> And Jenn just sits there and approves of what he does with her silence.

It's better for you that I should remain silent. I don't care to debate
matters of faith on an audio newsgroup.

>
> By being silent, she has him to do her dirty work for her, and spare her the
> usual Middiiot treatment.

What is my "dirty work" Arny?

>
> > Never mind that in the process your faith is ridiculed.
>
> The Middiot is incapable of intelligent conversation. Everything is
> rediculed except for his posse members like Marc, Art, and Jenn.
>
>
> Art and Marc are about equally stupid (sub-carrot IQ) and every so often
> they blunder into criticizing the Middiot, as Marc did today.

Jenn[_2_]

May 23rd 08, 03:20 AM

In article
>,
John Atkinson > wrote:

> On May 22, 3:47 pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > So here it is again for everyone to read, as predicted. You SAY you've
> > backed up your statements, but provide no evidence of it. You won't do
> > that, because you CAN'T do it. You SAY you've quoted in detail, but you
> > haven't, because you can't. You SAY that you've done these things, but
> > there is no evidence of it, because you CAN'T do it. We now have yet
> > another record of your lack of integrity.
>
> A long long record, Jenn. But it makes no difference
> to Mr. Krueger. All he seeks is attention and once
> again he has suckered someone who has better
> things to do with her time to giving him that
> attention. Listen to something like Eric Whitacre's
> Lux Aurumque

I just did it in December. Lovely work, and Eric is a nice, nice
person. I also did his "October" this season, and next season I'm doing
his Noisy Wheels of Joy.

> or Vaughan Williams' Flos Campi
> or Serenade to Music and put the narcissistic
> Mr. Krueger out of your mind. Reflect on the fact
> that you only encounter him occasionally but he
> has to be with himself 100% of the time. :-)
>
> John Atkinson
> Editor, Stereophile

I know. It's the end of the semester, and I'm tired and a bit bored.
It'll pass... ;-)

Jenn[_2_]

May 23rd 08, 03:22 AM

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On May 22, 9:19*am, Jenn > wrote:
> > In article
> > >,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > On May 21, 4:50*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > >,
> >
> > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > On May 21, 9:36*am, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > > > In article
> > > > > > >,
> >
> > > > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > > > On May 20, 11:03*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > om>,
> >
> > > > > > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On May 20, 3:57*pm, Jenn >
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > ps.c
> > > > > > > > > > om>,
> >
> > > > > > > > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > On May 20, 1:18*pm, Jenn >
> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > grou
> > > > > > > > > > > > ps.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > om>,
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 20, 12:49*pm, Jenn
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > *"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Jenn" > wrote in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > message
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >news:jennconductsREMOVETHIS-956852.12254020052008@n
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >ewsc
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >lstr
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >02.n
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >ews.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >prod
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >igy.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> It's just like you Jenn to fault me for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> failing to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> omniscient, and then play the pity card.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not faulting you for being "omniscient".
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I never said you did.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > You didn't? *How do you know that it's "just like
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > me"?
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You took an
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > uneducated guess, and you were wrong.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, I was being a tiny bit sarcastic.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > You should try being nice to people.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And I'm not playing the "pity card".
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Spare me!
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why spare you from the truth?
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *I'm pointing out what an asshole you're being.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How sweet of you, Jenn.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > You shouldn't pick fights if you don't want to have
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > one.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> What's your beef with me?
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Your lack of character.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > More being an asshole on your part.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, just reflecting on readily observable facts.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've asked this many times before and you haven't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > answered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > question: *
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > How, in your opinion, do I show lack of character?
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > People of character don't tolerate miscreants just
> > > > > > > > > > > > > because
> > > > > > > > > > > > > they
> > > > > > > > > > > > > aren't the brunt of their attention.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ScottW
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Speak to Arny, Scott. *Glass houses and all...
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > On the scale of snot, Arny is barely a buger compared to
> > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > never ending stream that is Middiot/****R.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > ScottW
> >
> > > > > > > > > > You give as well as you get with them. *It's between you
> > > > > > > > > > guys.
> >
> > > > > > > > > *You smear guys everywhere giving those social misfits
> > > > > > > > > such a title.
> >
> > > > > > > > > *But this everyone for themselves mentality is hardly a
> > > > > > > > > sign of character.
> >
> > > > > > > > > ScottW
> >
> > > > > > > > Ok. *I expect you to now take on Arny on my behalf.
> >
> > > > > > > *When he just starts spamming childish insult and vulgarities,
> > > > > > > I'll be right on it.
> >
> > > > > > You're already late.
> >
> > > > > * Reference?
> >
> > > > > ScottW
> >
> > > > You really need examples?
> >
> > > *Should be easy to provide. Not simple disagreements or even
> > > inuendo but the
> > > seriously grade school crap of Middiot and Ssshhhie.
> >
> > Should be easy for you to recognize.
>
> I was giving you a break as I don't often bother to read
> you and Arny's tit tat.

And I don't often read you/Shhhh/George's. Yet, I'm expected to comment
on it.

>
> But if you have no aggregious quote, I guess I'll just
> have to judge the claim by the source.

Just see my first post in the thread, and read Arny's response.

> >
> >
> >
> > > My gut feel is your level of sensitivity is extremely high
> > > when it's about you.
> >
> > "At least" that's really different than you, right?
>
> I am an extremely sensitive individual :)
>
> ScottW

George M. Middius[_4_]

May 23rd 08, 03:26 AM

Jenn said:

> And I don't often read you/Shhhh/George's. Yet, I'm expected to comment
> on it.

Like it or not, Arnii and Scottie see you as RAO's Headmistress.

George M. Middius[_4_]

May 23rd 08, 03:35 AM

Jenn said:

> > By being silent, she has him to do her dirty work for her,

> What is my "dirty work" Arny?

Arnii knows you loathe and despise him. You can't conceal the truth by
not revealing it. Arnii knows what Arnii knows.

yellowmattercustard

May 23rd 08, 03:35 AM

George M. Middius wrote:

> Apple's latest slogan is "the computer for the rest of us". That's not
> empty adspeak. Outside of the corporate world and the custom SW arena,
> Macs dominate professional desktops.

Well, I can tell you this ... I love my friggin Mac. Being forced to
work in a windoze environment all day long (due to my vendors being
computer illiterate) makes coming home a joy.

....and vista? What a joke! XP has it beat hands down. I've never seen a
buggier OS in my entire life. I had it on two different computers (XP
dual boot and OSX dual boot) but alas, it's inadequacies have left me
cold. I'm down to the XP dual boot installation and even then, I haven't
used it in over two months now. It's junk!

Clyde Slick

May 23rd 08, 04:34 AM

On 22 Mai, 10:02, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
> > My relevant response was snipped, talk about lies, you
> > are the biggest liar there is
>
> No Art, I trim out as much irrelevant garbage as I can. With your replies,
> that's why I often don't reply - I trimmed out everything you wrote.
>
> > recocile that with your Bible based religion.
>
> Where's your beef Art, besides your complete ignorance of it?
>
> > And reconcile Genesis with real science.
>
> Where's your beef Art, besides your complete ignorance of both the Bible and
> real science?
>
> > we await your answer.
>
> Note the title line Art, your whole post is again irrelevant to the thread.

Answer the questions
Reconcile Genesis with science

Clyde Slick

May 23rd 08, 04:36 AM

On 22 Mai, 16:21, Jenn > wrote:
> In article >,
> *"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> > > In article >,
> > > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> > .
> > >> com
> > >>> In article
> > >>> >, "Arny
> > >>> Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > >>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
> > >>>> message
> >
> > >>>> y.
> > >>>> com
> > >>>>> In article
> > >>>>> >, "Arny
> > >>>>> Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > >>>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
> > >>>>>> message
> >
> > >>>>>> ig
> > >>>>>> y.
> > >>>>>> net
> > >>>>>>> In article
> > >>>>>>> >,
> > >>>>>>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > >>>>>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
> > >>>>>>>> message
> >
> > >>>>>>>> od
> > >>>>>>>> ig
> > >>>>>>>> y.
> > >>>>>>>> com
> > >>>>>>>>> In article
> > >>>>>>>>> >,
> > >>>>>>>>> ScottW > wrote:
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On May 20, 4:41 pm, George M. Middius
> > >>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Shhhh! said:
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Now please don't be a hypocrite with no morals
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> or integrity and say that this isn't 100%
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> logical. That would obviously be absurd.
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> I've heard the Bible is full of "absurd" stuff.
> > >>>>>>>>>>> What does Yapper think of that, I wonder?
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> *Obviously the christians here don't have the
> > >>>>>>>>>> character to defend their religion.
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Some Christians believe that the Bible DOES
> > >>>>>>>>> contain absurd stuff.
>
> > >>>>>>>> That's because that's what the Bible teaches,
>
> > >>>>>>> Which is why I wrote what I did. *Duh.
>
> > >>>>>>>> and unlike Jenn, some
> > >>>>>>>> Christians both know and try to follow what the
> > >>>>>>>> Bible teaches.
>
> > >>>>>>> You REALLY don't want to go there, Arny.
>
> > >>>>>> Been there, done that. Jenn, you've made no secret of
> > >>>>>> how poorly you understand and adhere to the teachings
> > >>>>>> of Christianity. You show your hypocrisy in other
> > >>>>>> ways.
>
> > >>>>> Another jerky statement by you. *OK, you want to go
> > >>>>> there... How have I shown that I poorly understand and
> > >>>>> adhere to the teachings of Christianity? *How have I
> > >>>>> shown hypocrisy? *Then it will be my turn...
>
> > >>>> I've explained the hypocrisy thing until I was blue in
> > >>>> the face, and then I realized that I was arguing
> > >>>> against your will not your reason. I won't make that
> > >>>> mistake again with a discussion of Christianity.
>
> > >>> As expected, once again you can't back up your
> > >>> statements about me.
>
> > >> Not at all. I'm all too aware, based on years of
> > >> experience, of your inability to comprehend your own
> > >> weaknesses and failings, Jenn.
>
> > >>> No Arny, you've never explained a thing.
>
> > >> That's a lie, but lie on, little sister.
>
> > >>> EVERY time you make a statement about my character and
> > >>> are pressed to back it up, you give this type of
> > >>> response.
>
> > >> Nope, only since I learned about the futility of
> > >> exlaining things to you that you don't want to
> > >> understand.
>
> > >>> EVERY time. *For example, you've accused me of
> > >>> lying, but when asked to show even one lie, you don't.
>
> > >> Actually, I've explained a number of them in great
> > >> detail, and watched you blow the explanations off.
>
> > >>> You simply say that you have, but you haven't.
>
> > >> I've even quoted them from google when you said that
> > >> they never happened.
>
> > >>> Here's
> > >>> the predictable next step: *I ask you to show where
> > >>> you've "explained the hypocrisy thing", and you say that
> > >>> you can't be bothered, or some other excuse in an effort
> > >>> to avoid actually answering the question.
>
> > >> No excuses, just facts.
>
> > >>> If you're
> > >>> going to make serious charges about a person's
> > >>> character,
> > >>> the least you can do, if you have integrity, is to back
> > >>> it up.
>
> > >> Been there, done that.
>
> > >> BTW Jern, you just played your stupid act again when
> > >> called for your slur about the professionalism of the
> > >> technical folk at the Idol final.
>
> > >> Teflon Jenn rides again. :-(
>
> > > So here it is again for everyone to read, as predicted.
> > > You SAY you've backed up your statements, but provide no
> > > evidence of it.
>
> > Been there, done that to no avail.
>
> And there it is AGAIN. *Drop the shovel, Arny.
>
>
>
> > > *You won't do that, because you CAN'T do it.
>
> > Jenn, what you're doing is the equivalent of a cute lesbian picking up a guy
> > at a bar. Ever do that in real life?
>
> lol *I generally don't go to bars.-

Unnoticed is this:

"At least" Arny considers you a cute lesbian!!!

Clyde Slick

May 23rd 08, 04:40 AM

On 22 Mai, 16:53, ScottW > wrote:
> On May 22, 1:50*pm, Jenn > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article >,
> > *George M. Middius > wrote:
>
> > > Jenn said:
>
> > > > > >>>> how poorly you understand and adhere to the teachings of
> > > > > >>>> Christianity.
>
> > > > > >>> How have I shown that I poorly understand and
> > > > > >>> adhere to the teachings of Christianity? *.... Then it will be my
> > > > > >>> turn...
>
> > > [...]
>
> > > > So here it is again for everyone to read, as predicted. *You SAY you've
> > > > backed up your statements, but provide no evidence of it. *You won't do
> > > > that, because you CAN'T do it. *You SAY you've quoted in detail, but you
> > > > haven't, because you can't. *You SAY that you've done these things, but
> > > > there is no evidence of it, because you CAN'T do it. *We now have yet
> > > > another record of your lack of integrity.
>
> > > It's been a while on RAO since a self-declared christian who isn't
> > > insane took Arnii to task for his fatuosity. You gave Turdy a chance to
> > > list your transgressions of faith, and in your judgment, he failed. So
> > > now how about pointing out, for the benefit of us non-believers, your
> > > views on Krooger's adherence to the tenets of his professed faith?
>
> > I believe that one's practice of his/her faith is (or should be) a very
> > personal thing. *It's not for me to judge, IMO.
>
> *Middiot will do it for you. *Never mind that in the process your
> faith
> is ridiculed.
>
> ScottW-

If you are talking about his abhorent behavior:

Arny's "faith" is NOT Christianity.
But If it is, then it should be subject to ridicule.

If you are talking about his belief in Creationism, then
I ask, what is your position on Creationism?

Clyde Slick

May 23rd 08, 04:42 AM

On 22 Mai, 17:10, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> Art and Marc are about equally stupid (sub-carrot IQ) and every so often
> they blunder into criticizing the Middiot, as Marc did today.

THE IQ challenge is still alive.
Are you up for it?

Clyde Slick

May 23rd 08, 04:44 AM

On 22 Mai, 19:30, John Atkinson > wrote:

Reflect on the fact
> that you only encounter him occasionally but he
> has to be with himself 100% of the time. :-)
>

Its gruesome enough to make him want to walk in front of a bus

Jenn[_2_]

May 23rd 08, 05:43 AM

In article
>,
Clyde Slick > wrote:

> On 22 Mai, 16:21, Jenn > wrote:
> > In article >,
> > *"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > "Jenn" > wrote in message
> > .
> > >net
> > > > In article >,
> > > > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> > >
> > > >>gy.
> > > >> com
> > > >>> In article
> > > >>> >, "Arny
> > > >>> Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > >>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
> > > >>>> message
> > >
> > > >>>>dig
> > > >>>> y.
> > > >>>> com
> > > >>>>> In article
> > > >>>>> >, "Arny
> > > >>>>> Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > >>>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
> > > >>>>>> message
> > >
> > > >>>>>>rod
> > > >>>>>> ig
> > > >>>>>> y.
> > > >>>>>> net
> > > >>>>>>> In article
> > > >>>>>>> >,
> > > >>>>>>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > >>>>>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in
> > > >>>>>>>> message
> > >
> > > >>>>>>>>.pr
> > > >>>>>>>> od
> > > >>>>>>>> ig
> > > >>>>>>>> y.
> > > >>>>>>>> com
> > > >>>>>>>>> In article
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> om>,
> > > >>>>>>>>> ScottW > wrote:
> >
> > > >>>>>>>>>> On May 20, 4:41 pm, George M. Middius
> > > >>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Shhhh! said:
> >
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Now please don't be a hypocrite with no morals
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> or integrity and say that this isn't 100%
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> logical. That would obviously be absurd.
> >
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> I've heard the Bible is full of "absurd" stuff.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> What does Yapper think of that, I wonder?
> >
> > > >>>>>>>>>> *Obviously the christians here don't have the
> > > >>>>>>>>>> character to defend their religion.
> >
> > > >>>>>>>>> Some Christians believe that the Bible DOES
> > > >>>>>>>>> contain absurd stuff.
> >
> > > >>>>>>>> That's because that's what the Bible teaches,
> >
> > > >>>>>>> Which is why I wrote what I did. *Duh.
> >
> > > >>>>>>>> and unlike Jenn, some
> > > >>>>>>>> Christians both know and try to follow what the
> > > >>>>>>>> Bible teaches.
> >
> > > >>>>>>> You REALLY don't want to go there, Arny.
> >
> > > >>>>>> Been there, done that. Jenn, you've made no secret of
> > > >>>>>> how poorly you understand and adhere to the teachings
> > > >>>>>> of Christianity. You show your hypocrisy in other
> > > >>>>>> ways.
> >
> > > >>>>> Another jerky statement by you. *OK, you want to go
> > > >>>>> there... How have I shown that I poorly understand and
> > > >>>>> adhere to the teachings of Christianity? *How have I
> > > >>>>> shown hypocrisy? *Then it will be my turn...
> >
> > > >>>> I've explained the hypocrisy thing until I was blue in
> > > >>>> the face, and then I realized that I was arguing
> > > >>>> against your will not your reason. I won't make that
> > > >>>> mistake again with a discussion of Christianity.
> >
> > > >>> As expected, once again you can't back up your
> > > >>> statements about me.
> >
> > > >> Not at all. I'm all too aware, based on years of
> > > >> experience, of your inability to comprehend your own
> > > >> weaknesses and failings, Jenn.
> >
> > > >>> No Arny, you've never explained a thing.
> >
> > > >> That's a lie, but lie on, little sister.
> >
> > > >>> EVERY time you make a statement about my character and
> > > >>> are pressed to back it up, you give this type of
> > > >>> response.
> >
> > > >> Nope, only since I learned about the futility of
> > > >> exlaining things to you that you don't want to
> > > >> understand.
> >
> > > >>> EVERY time. *For example, you've accused me of
> > > >>> lying, but when asked to show even one lie, you don't.
> >
> > > >> Actually, I've explained a number of them in great
> > > >> detail, and watched you blow the explanations off.
> >
> > > >>> You simply say that you have, but you haven't.
> >
> > > >> I've even quoted them from google when you said that
> > > >> they never happened.
> >
> > > >>> Here's
> > > >>> the predictable next step: *I ask you to show where
> > > >>> you've "explained the hypocrisy thing", and you say that
> > > >>> you can't be bothered, or some other excuse in an effort
> > > >>> to avoid actually answering the question.
> >
> > > >> No excuses, just facts.
> >
> > > >>> If you're
> > > >>> going to make serious charges about a person's
> > > >>> character,
> > > >>> the least you can do, if you have integrity, is to back
> > > >>> it up.
> >
> > > >> Been there, done that.
> >
> > > >> BTW Jern, you just played your stupid act again when
> > > >> called for your slur about the professionalism of the
> > > >> technical folk at the Idol final.
> >
> > > >> Teflon Jenn rides again. :-(
> >
> > > > So here it is again for everyone to read, as predicted.
> > > > You SAY you've backed up your statements, but provide no
> > > > evidence of it.
> >
> > > Been there, done that to no avail.
> >
> > And there it is AGAIN. *Drop the shovel, Arny.
> >
> >
> >
> > > > *You won't do that, because you CAN'T do it.
> >
> > > Jenn, what you're doing is the equivalent of a cute lesbian picking up a
> > > guy
> > > at a bar. Ever do that in real life?
> >
> > lol *I generally don't go to bars.-
>
> Unnoticed is this:
>
> "At least" Arny considers you a cute lesbian!!!

Well, thank goodness.

Jenn[_2_]

May 23rd 08, 05:52 AM

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On May 22, 7:22*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > In article
> > >,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > On May 22, 9:19*am, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > >,
> >
> > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > On May 21, 4:50*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > > > In article
> > > > > > >,
> >
> > > > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > > > On May 21, 9:36*am, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > m>,
> >
> > > > > > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On May 20, 11:03*pm, Jenn >
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > ps.c
> > > > > > > > > > om>,
> >
> > > > > > > > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > On May 20, 3:57*pm, Jenn >
> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > grou
> > > > > > > > > > > > ps.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > om>,
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 20, 1:18*pm, Jenn
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ogle
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > grou
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ps.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > om>,
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 20, 12:49*pm, Jenn
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Jenn" > wrote
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > message
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >news:jennconductsREMOVETHIS-956852.122540200520
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >08@n
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >ewsc
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >lstr
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >02.n
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >ews.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >prod
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >igy.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> It's just like you Jenn to fault me for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> failing to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> omniscient, and then play the pity card.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not faulting you for being
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "omniscient".
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I never said you did.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You didn't? *How do you know that it's "just
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > like
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > me"?
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You took an
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > uneducated guess, and you were wrong.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, I was being a tiny bit sarcastic.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You should try being nice to people.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And I'm not playing the "pity card".
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Spare me!
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why spare you from the truth?
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *I'm pointing out what an asshole you're
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > being.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How sweet of you, Jenn.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You shouldn't pick fights if you don't want to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > one.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> What's your beef with me?
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Your lack of character.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > More being an asshole on your part.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, just reflecting on readily observable
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > facts.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've asked this many times before and you
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > haven't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > answered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > question: *
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How, in your opinion, do I show lack of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > character?
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > People of character don't tolerate miscreants
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > just
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > they
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > aren't the brunt of their attention.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ScottW
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Speak to Arny, Scott. *Glass houses and all...
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On the scale of snot, Arny is barely a buger compared
> > > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > never ending stream that is Middiot/****R.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ScottW
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > You give as well as you get with them. *It's between
> > > > > > > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > > > > > guys.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > *You smear guys everywhere giving those social misfits
> > > > > > > > > > > such a title.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > *But this everyone for themselves mentality is hardly a
> > > > > > > > > > > sign of character.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > ScottW
> >
> > > > > > > > > > Ok. *I expect you to now take on Arny on my behalf.
> >
> > > > > > > > > *When he just starts spamming childish insult and
> > > > > > > > > vulgarities,
> > > > > > > > > I'll be right on it.
> >
> > > > > > > > You're already late.
> >
> > > > > > > * Reference?
> >
> > > > > > > ScottW
> >
> > > > > > You really need examples?
> >
> > > > > *Should be easy to provide. Not simple disagreements or even
> > > > > inuendo but the
> > > > > seriously grade school crap of Middiot and Ssshhhie.
> >
> > > > Should be easy for you to recognize.
> >
> > > *I was giving you a break as I don't often bother to read
> > > you and Arny's tit tat.
> >
> > And I don't often read you/Shhhh/George's. *Yet, I'm expected to comment
> > on it.
>
> You must not read George at all, he's a turd to anyone who join his
> crusade
> and often the first to flame a newb.

Have I ever stated otherwise? I've written several times that I find
all of the name calling and especially gross references to certain
sexual practices he accuses people of to be disgusting. He knows how I
feel about it.

BTW, that said, the three best writers in the group are clearly George,
Shhhh, and John, content not withstanding.

> >
> >
> >
> > > *But if you have no aggregious quote, I guess I'll just
> > > have to judge the claim by the source.
> >
> > Just see my first post in the thread, and read Arny's response.
>
> Am I missing the childish insults?

I guess so.

>
> ScottW

George M. Middius[_4_]

May 23rd 08, 05:57 AM

Jenn said:

> > "At least" Arny considers you a cute lesbian!!!
>
> Well, thank goodness.

Bear in mind that Turdy is quite confused about your age. He thinks
you're around 32.

Jenn[_2_]

May 23rd 08, 05:58 AM

In article >,
George M. Middius > wrote:

> Jenn said:
>
> > > "At least" Arny considers you a cute lesbian!!!
> >
> > Well, thank goodness.
>
> Bear in mind that Turdy is quite confused about your age. He thinks
> you're around 32.

I AM around 32. WAY around 32 ;-)

Arny Krueger

May 23rd 08, 12:09 PM

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message

> On 22 Mai, 10:02, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> Answer the questions

> Reconcile Genesis with science

Genesis says why.

Science says how.

Arny Krueger

May 23rd 08, 12:10 PM

"Jenn" > wrote in message

> In article >,
> George M. Middius > wrote:
>
>> Jenn said:
>>
>>>> "At least" Arny considers you a cute lesbian!!!
>>>
>>> Well, thank goodness.
>>
>> Bear in mind that Turdy is quite confused about your
>> age. He thinks you're around 32.

> I AM around 32. WAY around 32 ;-)

So how many years until you draw social security, Jenn?

Arny Krueger

May 23rd 08, 12:11 PM

"Jenn" > wrote in message

> In article >,
> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
>> "ScottW" > wrote in message
>>
>>> On May 22, 1:50 pm, Jenn
>>> > wrote:
>>
>>>> I believe that one's practice of his/her faith is (or
>>>> should be) a very personal thing. It's not for me to
>>>> judge, IMO.
>>
>>> Middiot will do it for you.
>>
>> And Jenn just sits there and approves of what he does
>> with her silence.
>
> It's better for you that I should remain silent. I don't
> care to debate matters of faith on an audio newsgroup.
>
>>
>> By being silent, she has him to do her dirty work for
>> her, and spare her the usual Middiiot treatment.
>
> What is my "dirty work" Arny?

Trying to be dominant.

Arny Krueger

May 23rd 08, 12:15 PM

"John Atkinson" > wrote in
message

Jenn. But it makes no difference
> to Mr. Krueger. All he seeks is attention and once
> again he has suckered someone who has better
> things to do with her time to giving him that
> attention.

The real truth John is that as opposed to you, I seek the truth about audio
and I want it to be well-known.

That of course makes you a big target.

Arny Krueger

May 23rd 08, 12:18 PM

"Harry Lavo" > wrote in message

> I can vouch for that. I took delivery of two of them
> this week. They will replace my 160k mirrored HD's for
> photo storage with 500k of mirrored storage. And they
> cost about teh same as the 160K's did two years ago.
> Can't beat that.

Anybody with an iPod can beat someone with "160k" and "500k" hard drives by
about 30 years.

Actually, I don't think there ever were PC hard drives as small as 160K, but
there were floppys that small. My recollection is that the first PC hard
drives were 5 megabytes.

John Atkinson[_2_]

May 23rd 08, 12:31 PM

On May 22, 10:20 pm, Jenn > wrote:
> In article
> >,
> John Atkinson > wrote:
> > Listen to something like Eric Whitacre's Lux Aurumque
>
> I just did it in December. Lovely work, and Eric is a nice, nice
> person. I also did his "October" this season, and next season
> I'm doing his Noisy Wheels of Joy.

I mentioned it because I have just finished mixing and
editing a performance for release on CD in the summer.
I am in awe that such contemplative, beautiful,
new-sounding music can be composed in the 21st
century.

Paying attention to Mr. Krueger's self-absorption and
petty jealousies seems pointless when such music
opens a gateway to depths of joy, for wnat of a better
word.

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile

Arny Krueger

May 23rd 08, 12:35 PM

"John Atkinson" > wrote in
message

> Paying attention to Mr. Krueger's self-absorption and
> petty jealousies seems pointless when such music
> opens a gateway to depths of joy, for wnat of a better
> word.

If paying attention to self-absorbtion and petty jealosies is so pointless
John, how do you cope with most of Stereophile's writers? Why do you have
any time for the Middiot? How do you live with yourself?

Harry Lavo

May 23rd 08, 01:01 PM

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
. ..
> "Harry Lavo" > wrote in message
>
>
>> I can vouch for that. I took delivery of two of them
>> this week. They will replace my 160k mirrored HD's for
>> photo storage with 500k of mirrored storage. And they
>> cost about teh same as the 160K's did two years ago.
>> Can't beat that.
>
> Anybody with an iPod can beat someone with "160k" and "500k" hard drives
> by about 30 years.
>
> Actually, I don't think there ever were PC hard drives as small as 160K,
> but there were floppys that small. My recollection is that the first PC
> hard drives were 5 megabytes.

I'm just a 1980 person trapped in a 2008 body? How'd I get here? :-)

Obviously a very, very senior moment.

I assume most people will read Gb and let it go at that.

George M. Middius[_4_]

May 23rd 08, 03:40 PM

This thread has been rated XXX. Turn on your filters and send the
kiddies out of the room.

> > What is my "dirty work" Arny?
>
> Trying to be dominant.

Bingo! Called it!

Jenn[_2_]

May 23rd 08, 04:16 PM

In article
>,
John Atkinson > wrote:

> On May 22, 10:20 pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > In article
> > >,
> > John Atkinson > wrote:
> > > Listen to something like Eric Whitacre's Lux Aurumque
> >
> > I just did it in December. Lovely work, and Eric is a nice, nice
> > person. I also did his "October" this season, and next season
> > I'm doing his Noisy Wheels of Joy.
>
> I mentioned it because I have just finished mixing and
> editing a performance for release on CD in the summer.
> I am in awe that such contemplative, beautiful,
> new-sounding music can be composed in the 21st
> century.

Neat, I'll look forward to it.
Yes, contemporary classical music has taken a welcome turn, IMO. If you
haven't had the chance yet, check out Lauridsen.

>
> Paying attention to Mr. Krueger's self-absorption and
> petty jealousies seems pointless when such music
> opens a gateway to depths of joy, for wnat of a better
> word.

Indeed. I'll get over it soon ;-) Tomorrow and SUnday are all listening
for pleasure with about 3 hours of practicing thrown in. I need to
finish a little piece that I'm writing for guitar in DADGAD tuning to
play at a lesson with Laurence Juber that is coming up. Speaking of LJ,
may I recommend his pretty new CD for review in SP? Great sound
(recorded at Capitol), great playing.
http://www.acousticmusicresource.com/product_info.php?cPath=7&products_id
=5428

Jenn[_2_]

May 23rd 08, 04:19 PM

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> > In article >,
> > George M. Middius > wrote:
> >
> >> Jenn said:
> >>
> >>>> "At least" Arny considers you a cute lesbian!!!
> >>>
> >>> Well, thank goodness.
> >>
> >> Bear in mind that Turdy is quite confused about your
> >> age. He thinks you're around 32.
>
> > I AM around 32. WAY around 32 ;-)
>
> So how many years until you draw social security, Jenn?

I'm 51. If in good health, I hope to work until I'm 67, then just guest
conduct and play little acoustic guitar gigs, along with finally doing
some writing for journals, until I drop.

Jenn[_2_]

May 23rd 08, 04:20 PM

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> > In article >,
> > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> >> "ScottW" > wrote in message
> >>
> >>> On May 22, 1:50 pm, Jenn
> >>> > wrote:
> >>
> >>>> I believe that one's practice of his/her faith is (or
> >>>> should be) a very personal thing. It's not for me to
> >>>> judge, IMO.
> >>
> >>> Middiot will do it for you.
> >>
> >> And Jenn just sits there and approves of what he does
> >> with her silence.
> >
> > It's better for you that I should remain silent. I don't
> > care to debate matters of faith on an audio newsgroup.
> >
> >>
> >> By being silent, she has him to do her dirty work for
> >> her, and spare her the usual Middiiot treatment.
> >
> > What is my "dirty work" Arny?
>
> Trying to be dominant.

lol Good one.

Arny Krueger

May 23rd 08, 04:52 PM

"Jenn" > wrote in message

> In article >,
> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>>
>>> In article >,
>>> George M. Middius > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jenn said:
>>>>
>>>>>> "At least" Arny considers you a cute lesbian!!!
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, thank goodness.
>>>>
>>>> Bear in mind that Turdy is quite confused about your
>>>> age. He thinks you're around 32.
>>
>>> I AM around 32. WAY around 32 ;-)
>>
>> So how many years until you draw social security, Jenn?
>
> I'm 51. If in good health, I hope to work until I'm 67,
> then just guest conduct and play little acoustic guitar
> gigs, along with finally doing some writing for journals,
> until I drop.

Just a babe.

Bill[_16_]

May 23rd 08, 05:35 PM

In article <jennconductsREMOVETHIS-36E2D4.21521722052008
@news.la.sbcglobal.net>, says...

> BTW, that said, the three best writers in the group are clearly George,
> Shhhh, and John, content not withstanding.

I agree - though Stephen certainly merits some recognition. He can be a
touch obscure at times, but that's half the fun. I also think that Bob's
posts can be very thought provoking and enjoyable to read.

You do a pretty good job of expressing yourself as well Jenn.

--
Bill

George M. Middius[_4_]

May 23rd 08, 05:38 PM

Bill said:

> > BTW, that said, the three best writers in the group are clearly George,
> > Shhhh, and John, content not withstanding.

> I agree - though Stephen certainly merits some recognition. He can be a
> touch obscure at times, but that's half the fun. I also think that Bob's
> posts can be very thought provoking and enjoyable to read.
>
> You do a pretty good job of expressing yourself as well Jenn.

So do you, Bill. Even Ken from the UK is ten times clearer than
duh-Scottie.

Bill[_16_]

May 23rd 08, 05:42 PM

In article >,
says...

[...]

> > > What is my "dirty work" Arny?
> >
> > Trying to be dominant.
>
> Bingo! Called it!

LOL!

Very good call. For the life of me I can't see where Mr. Kreuger gets
that idea though. Maybe it stems from the bad experiences he had in high
school with those mean teenage girls?

George M. Middius[_4_]

May 23rd 08, 06:01 PM

Bill said:

> > > > What is my "dirty work" Arny?
> > >
> > > Trying to be dominant.
> >
> > Bingo! Called it!
>
> LOL!
>
> Very good call. For the life of me I can't see where Mr. Kreuger gets
> that idea though. Maybe it stems from the bad experiences he had in high
> school with those mean teenage girls?

Yep. There has to be a connection. Too bad we can't look at his mother's
psychiatric record.

George M. Middius[_4_]

May 23rd 08, 07:20 PM

Time for another bout of irrational yapping.

> > > > > > What is my "dirty work" Arny?
> >
> > > > > Trying to be dominant.
> >
> > > > Bingo! Called it!
> >
> > > Very good call. For the life of me I can't see where Mr. Kreuger gets
> > > that idea though. Maybe it stems from the bad experiences he had in high
> > > school with those mean teenage girls?
> >
> > Yep. There has to be a connection. Too bad we can't look at his mother's
> > psychiatric record.
>
> If he was truly sick, how sick are you for wanting to look at this?

Scottie, the lesson you should have drawn from your meltdown yesterday
is that the impulses that flit through your dim little "mind" are not
comprehensible thoughts. First, nobody else has any idea why you are
inferring that the Krooborg "was" sick, when we all know it ***IS***
sick. Yes, the Beast may well have been sick for quite some time, but we
on RAO only know of its illness starting in '97 or so.

Second, I referred to Mama Krooborg's record. I implied that Turdy's
mama was also sick. (Why that implication was relevant to the discussion
I'll leave to somebody to explain to you.)

Third, there's no apparent reason why you think it would be "sick" on
*my* part to inquire into Mama Krooborg's mental health. My suggestion
clearly follows from the discussion to that point. (That is, it follows
if the reader has normal intelligence and reading comprehension skill.
If the reader is handicapped in those areas, all bets are off.)

I'm sorry you're a pathetic, feeble-minded dimbulb, but it's not my
fault. Nor does it make me "sick". It would be better for all concerned
if you would just shut your yap and leave the discussions of mental
health to we who aren't quasi-retarded.

George M. Middius[_4_]

May 23rd 08, 07:22 PM

MiNe 109 said:

> > > > > > What is my "dirty work" Arny?
> > > > >
> > > > > Trying to be dominant.
> > > >
> > > > Bingo! Called it!
> > >
> > > LOL!
> > >
> > > Very good call. For the life of me I can't see where Mr. Kreuger gets
> > > that idea though. Maybe it stems from the bad experiences he had in high
> > > school with those mean teenage girls?
> >
> > Yep. There has to be a connection. Too bad we can't look at his mother's
> > psychiatric record.
>
> It's all about the patriarchy: Promise Keepers, men's rights, etc.

Sounds like a caveman's life to me.

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

May 23rd 08, 07:54 PM

On May 22, 9:17*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On May 22, 1:23*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> > On May 21, 7:49*pm, ScottW > wrote:
>
> > > On May 21, 4:50*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > >,
>
> > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > * That's like telling me not to walk on the beach
> > > > > to avoid the dog ****.
>
> > > > No, it would be like telling you to walk on the beach but avoid the dog
> > > > ****.
>
> > > *Progress, we agree Middiot and ****r are dog ****. *Now the question
> > > is how to deal with it/them.
>
> > I'll bet you still can't see why people think you're really stupid,
> > 2pid.
>
> *I have it on good authority your posts are dog****.

Your own. Lol

But as we've seen, your opinion is as valid as anybody else's on any
topic.

> > Lol
>
> *Be careful where you step.

I'm not on a leash, 2pid. I can walk where I please.

LoL

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

May 23rd 08, 07:58 PM

On May 22, 9:35*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On May 22, 7:22*pm, Jenn > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article
> > >,
>
> > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > On May 22, 9:19*am, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > >,
>
> > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > On May 21, 4:50*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > > > In article
> > > > > > >,
>
> > > > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > > > On May 21, 9:36*am, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > >,
>
> > > > > > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On May 20, 11:03*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > om>,
>
> > > > > > > > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > On May 20, 3:57*pm, Jenn >
> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > ps.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > om>,
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 20, 1:18*pm, Jenn >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > grou
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ps.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > om>,
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 20, 12:49*pm, Jenn
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Jenn" > wrote in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > message
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >news:jennconductsREMOVETHIS-956852.12254020052008@n
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >ewsc
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >lstr
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >02.n
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >ews.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >prod
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >igy.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> It's just like you Jenn to fault me for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> failing to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> omniscient, and then play the pity card..
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not faulting you for being "omniscient".
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I never said you did.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You didn't? *How do you know that it's "just like
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > me"?
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You took an
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > uneducated guess, and you were wrong.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, I was being a tiny bit sarcastic.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You should try being nice to people.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And I'm not playing the "pity card".
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Spare me!
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why spare you from the truth?
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *I'm pointing out what an asshole you're being.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How sweet of you, Jenn.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You shouldn't pick fights if you don't want to have
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > one.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> What's your beef with me?
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Your lack of character.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > More being an asshole on your part.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, just reflecting on readily observable facts.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've asked this many times before and you haven't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > answered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > question: *
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How, in your opinion, do I show lack of character?
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > People of character don't tolerate miscreants just
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > they
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > aren't the brunt of their attention.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ScottW
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Speak to Arny, Scott. *Glass houses and all...
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On the scale of snot, Arny is barely a buger compared to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > never ending stream that is Middiot/****R.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ScottW
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > You give as well as you get with them. *It's between you
> > > > > > > > > > > > guys.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > *You smear guys everywhere giving those social misfits
> > > > > > > > > > > such a title.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > *But this everyone for themselves mentality is hardly a
> > > > > > > > > > > sign of character.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > ScottW
>
> > > > > > > > > > Ok. *I expect you to now take on Arny on my behalf.
>
> > > > > > > > > *When he just starts spamming childish insult and vulgarities,
> > > > > > > > > I'll be right on it.
>
> > > > > > > > You're already late.
>
> > > > > > > * Reference?
>
> > > > > > > ScottW
>
> > > > > > You really need examples?
>
> > > > > *Should be easy to provide. Not simple disagreements or even
> > > > > inuendo but the
> > > > > seriously grade school crap of Middiot and Ssshhhie.
>
> > > > Should be easy for you to recognize.
>
> > > *I was giving you a break as I don't often bother to read
> > > you and Arny's tit tat.
>
> > And I don't often read you/Shhhh/George's. *Yet, I'm expected to comment
> > on it.
>
> *You must not read George at all, he's a turd to anyone who join his
> crusade
> and often the first to flame a newb.

Not everybody defines their existance through the actions of others,
2pid.

You may be the only one here who does. Lol

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

May 23rd 08, 08:01 PM

On May 22, 11:52*pm, Jenn > wrote:

> *ScottW > wrote:

> > > And I don't often read you/Shhhh/George's. *Yet, I'm expected to comment
> > > on it.
>
> > *You must not read George at all, he's a turd to anyone who join his
> > crusade
> > and often the first to flame a newb.
>
> Have I ever stated otherwise? *I've written several times that I find
> all of the name calling and especially gross references to certain
> sexual practices he accuses people of to be disgusting. *He *knows how I
> feel about it.

I know how you feel about it as well. Perhaps this will suffice to
silence 2pid's constant nattering at you to "take me to task" but I
doubt it.

> BTW, that said, the three best writers in the group are clearly George,
> Shhhh, and John, content not withstanding.

Thank you.

Jenn[_2_]

May 23rd 08, 08:10 PM

In article >,
Bill > wrote:

> In article <jennconductsREMOVETHIS-36E2D4.21521722052008
> @news.la.sbcglobal.net>, says...
>
> > BTW, that said, the three best writers in the group are clearly George,
> > Shhhh, and John, content not withstanding.
>
>
> I agree - though Stephen certainly merits some recognition.

Agreed.

> He can be a
> touch obscure at times, but that's half the fun. I also think that Bob's
> posts can be very thought provoking and enjoyable to read.

Yep.

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

May 23rd 08, 08:12 PM

On May 23, 1:19*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On May 22, 9:52*pm, Jenn > wrote:

> > BTW, that said, the three best writers in the group are clearly George,
> > Shhhh, and John, content not withstanding.
>
> * A ridiculous statement if there ever was one.

LMAO!

> *All the eloquence in the world cannot make up for vacuous writing.

LMAO!

I feel like my writing has just been crtiticized by a retarded thrid-
grader.

> *It's attitude like that which leads to the acceptance of the BS
> below in a meaningful and disturbing way.
>
> http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/23/congressman-admits-dems-stretche...
>
> "“Now anybody was a good student of Government,” said Kanjorski,
> “would know that wasn’t true [that they “could stop the war”].”

But that's not good writing, 2pid. There's something missing. ;-)

> No matter, they spoke well and eloquently. Who cares if it's all
> childish BULL****?

Most people can see that what I've written to you, e.g. our
'discussions' on JFK's role in Vietnam, how to fight insurgencies (and
many other military matters), your inconsistencies of thought,
hypocrisy, and poor logic and on and on, isn't "BULL****" though. I
know you can't see that, but we all know that you're 'special'. ;-)

> Apparently not Jenn.

Well, I did "retire in protest", right, 2pid? So my opinions are quite
not as valid as yours.

Still, as "bad" as that is, I do suppose that's somehow better than
"totally refusing to serve my country based on selfishness and
cowardice".

But apparently you do not agree. ;-)

Lol

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

May 23rd 08, 08:21 PM

On May 23, 1:42*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On May 23, 11:20*am, George M. Middius >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Time for another bout of irrational yapping.
>
> > > > > > > > What is my "dirty work" Arny?
>
> > > > > > > Trying to be dominant.
>
> > > > > > Bingo! Called it!
>
> > > > > Very good call. For the life of me I can't see where Mr. Kreuger gets
> > > > > that idea though. Maybe it stems from the bad experiences he had in high
> > > > > school with those mean teenage girls?
>
> > > > Yep. There has to be a connection. Too bad we can't look at his mother's
> > > > psychiatric record.
>
> > > *If he was truly sick, how sick are you for wanting to look at this?
>
> > Scottie, the lesson you should have drawn from your meltdown yesterday
> > is that the impulses that flit through your dim little "mind" are not
> > comprehensible thoughts. First, nobody else has any idea why you are
> > inferring that the Krooborg "was" sick, when we all know it ***IS***
> > sick.
>
> * And if you know this, it's sick of you to want to examine
> his family history.
>
> *All the shallow eloquence

Lol 2pid's new bumper sticker: "They may be smarter than I am and they
may be able to write better than I can and they all understand logic
better than I do and they may have more experience and training than I
do, but my opinion is still valid!"

> in the world can't hide your
> twisted sadistic perversions.

I do get a perverse pleasure exposing the depths of your stupidity,
2pid. I can't help it. You make it so fun.

> Well, maybe from Jenn it does.

Jenn has said several times that she does not approve of what I
write. You have never said that you don't approve of what GOIA writes.
That somehow puts you on a higher moral plane than Jenn, and shows
more 'integrity'. Right, 2pid?

What an "obviously" "absurd" thing to say. Why are you pointing
fingers...again? ;-)

Lol

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

May 23rd 08, 08:22 PM

On May 23, 1:58*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On May 23, 11:54*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> > On May 22, 9:17*pm, ScottW > wrote:
>
> > > On May 22, 1:23*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > On May 21, 7:49*pm, ScottW > wrote:
>
> > > > > On May 21, 4:50*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > > > In article
> > > > > > >,
>
> > > > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > > > * That's like telling me not to walk on the beach
> > > > > > > to avoid the dog ****.
>
> > > > > > No, it would be like telling you to walk on the beach but avoid the dog
> > > > > > ****.
>
> > > > > *Progress, we agree Middiot and ****r are dog ****. *Now the question
> > > > > is how to deal with it/them.
>
> > > > I'll bet you still can't see why people think you're really stupid,
> > > > 2pid.
>
> > > *I have it on good authority your posts are dog****.
>
> > Your own. Lol
>
> * You obviously *just don't pay much attention to anything.
>
>
>
> > But as we've seen, your opinion is as valid as anybody else's on any
> > topic.
>
> * That includes yours, thank-you.
>
>
>
> > > > Lol
>
> > > *Be careful where you step.
>
> > I'm not on a leash, 2pid. I can walk where I please.
>
> *Obviously. But considering your droppings should it
> be so?

You said "dog ****", 2pid. Yap yap yap. Bark bark bark

<insert another IKYABWAI here>

Bill[_16_]

May 23rd 08, 08:38 PM

In article >,
says...
>
> I'm just a 1980 person trapped in a 2008 body? How'd I get here? :-)
>
> Obviously a very, very senior moment.
>
> I assume most people will read Gb and let it go at that.

Don't worry Harry - everyone knew what you meant. I'm sure even Arny
did, but he'll never pass up an opportunity for "debating trade" points.

--
Bill

John Atkinson[_2_]

May 23rd 08, 11:09 PM

On May 23, 12:52 am, Jenn > wrote:
> BTW, that said, the three best writers in the group are clearly George,
> Shhhh, and John, content not withstanding.

Thanks Jenn. I'm saddened that the usual suspects
judge writing ability by _what_ is written, not by _how_
it is written.

And to echo Bill, Stephen Milne and Bob Morein
always post thoughtful and thought-provoking
ideas. As do you.

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile

George M. Middius[_4_]

May 23rd 08, 11:39 PM

John Atkinson said:

> And to echo Bill, Stephen [McElroy] and Bob Morein
> always post thoughtful and thought-provoking
> ideas. As do you.

Thoughts provoke bad. Make Scottie's head hurt. Yow-wow-woof!

Jenn[_2_]

May 24th 08, 01:09 AM

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On May 22, 9:52*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > In article
> > >,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > On May 22, 7:22*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > >,
> >
> > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > On May 22, 9:19*am, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > > > In article
> > > > > > >,
> >
> > > > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > > > On May 21, 4:50*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > om>,
> >
> > > > > > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On May 21, 9:36*am, Jenn >
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > s.co
> > > > > > > > > > m>,
> >
> > > > > > > > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > On May 20, 11:03*pm, Jenn
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > grou
> > > > > > > > > > > > ps.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > om>,
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 20, 3:57*pm, Jenn
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ogle
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > grou
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ps.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > om>,
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 20, 1:18*pm, Jenn
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <1f0e5b0e-5e16-43c5-8aa4-6b2e8c2b0...@z16g2000pr
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > n.go
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ogle
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > grou
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ps.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > om>,
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 20, 12:49*pm, Jenn
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Jenn" >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > message
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >news:jennconductsREMOVETHIS-956852.1225402005
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >08@n
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >ewsc
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >lstr
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >02.n
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >ews.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >prod
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >igy.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In article
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Arny Krueger" >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> It's just like you Jenn to fault me
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> failing to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> omniscient, and then play the pity
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > card.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not faulting you for being
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "omniscient".
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I never said you did.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You didn't? *How do you know that it's
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "just
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > like
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > me"?
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You took an
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > uneducated guess, and you were wrong.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, I was being a tiny bit sarcastic.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You should try being nice to people.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And I'm not playing the "pity card".
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Spare me!
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why spare you from the truth?
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *I'm pointing out what an asshole
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you're
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > being.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How sweet of you, Jenn.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You shouldn't pick fights if you don't want
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > one.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> What's your beef with me?
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Your lack of character.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > More being an asshole on your part.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, just reflecting on readily observable
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > facts.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've asked this many times before and you
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > haven't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > answered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > question: *
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How, in your opinion, do I show lack of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > character?
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > People of character don't tolerate miscreants
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > just
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > they
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > aren't the brunt of their attention.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ScottW
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Speak to Arny, Scott. *Glass houses and all...
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On the scale of snot, Arny is barely a buger
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > compared
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > never ending stream that is Middiot/****R.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ScottW
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > You give as well as you get with them. *It's
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > between
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > guys.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > *You smear guys everywhere giving those social
> > > > > > > > > > > > > misfits
> > > > > > > > > > > > > such a title.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > *But this everyone for themselves mentality is hardly
> > > > > > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > sign of character.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ScottW
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Ok. *I expect you to now take on Arny on my behalf.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > *When he just starts spamming childish insult and
> > > > > > > > > > > vulgarities,
> > > > > > > > > > > I'll be right on it.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > You're already late.
> >
> > > > > > > > > * Reference?
> >
> > > > > > > > > ScottW
> >
> > > > > > > > You really need examples?
> >
> > > > > > > *Should be easy to provide. Not simple disagreements or even
> > > > > > > inuendo but the
> > > > > > > seriously grade school crap of Middiot and Ssshhhie.
> >
> > > > > > Should be easy for you to recognize.
> >
> > > > > *I was giving you a break as I don't often bother to read
> > > > > you and Arny's tit tat.
> >
> > > > And I don't often read you/Shhhh/George's. *Yet, I'm expected to
> > > > comment
> > > > on it.
> >
> > > *You must not read George at all, he's a turd to anyone who join his
> > > crusade
> > > and often the first to flame a newb.
> >
> > Have I ever stated otherwise? *I've written several times that I find
> > all of the name calling and especially gross references to certain
> > sexual practices he accuses people of to be disgusting. *He *knows how I
> > feel about it.
> >
> > BTW, that said, the three best writers in the group are clearly George,
> > Shhhh, and John, content not withstanding.

Do you know what "content not withstanding" means?

Jenn[_2_]

May 24th 08, 01:09 AM

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On May 23, 11:20*am, George M. Middius >
> wrote:
> > Time for another bout of irrational yapping.
> >
> > > > > > > > What is my "dirty work" Arny?
> >
> > > > > > > Trying to be dominant.
> >
> > > > > > Bingo! Called it!
> >
> > > > > Very good call. For the life of me I can't see where Mr. Kreuger gets
> > > > > that idea though. Maybe it stems from the bad experiences he had in
> > > > > high
> > > > > school with those mean teenage girls?
> >
> > > > Yep. There has to be a connection. Too bad we can't look at his
> > > > mother's
> > > > psychiatric record.
> >
> > > *If he was truly sick, how sick are you for wanting to look at this?
> >
> > Scottie, the lesson you should have drawn from your meltdown yesterday
> > is that the impulses that flit through your dim little "mind" are not
> > comprehensible thoughts. First, nobody else has any idea why you are
> > inferring that the Krooborg "was" sick, when we all know it ***IS***
> > sick.
>
> And if you know this, it's sick of you to want to examine
> his family history.
>
> All the shallow eloquence in the world can't hide your
> twisted sadistic perversions.
> Well, maybe from Jenn it does.
>
> ScottW

Do you know what "content not withstanding" means?

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

May 24th 08, 01:13 AM

On May 23, 7:09*pm, Jenn > wrote:

> Do you know what "content not withstanding" means?

Silly question, Jenn.

2pid, it means that Jenn sees that I am a good writer, but that she
doesn't necessarily agree with what I write.

Sorry, Jenn, but 2pid is FAR too ****ing stupid to pick up on such
subtlety.

Arny Krueger

May 24th 08, 01:37 AM

"John Atkinson" > wrote in
message

> On May 23, 12:52 am, Jenn
> > wrote:
>> BTW, that said, the three best writers in the group are
>> clearly George, Shhhh, and John, content not
>> withstanding.
>
> Thanks Jenn. I'm saddened that the usual suspects
> judge writing ability by _what_ is written, not by _how_
> it is written.

Indeed John you should be saddened when posts are judged by what is written,
because your posts are generally written about nothing that matters in the
larger scheme of things. Little or no audio content whatsever. Mostly about
how hurt you are by certain people on this group.

Clyde Slick

May 24th 08, 01:53 AM

On 23 Mai, 12:33, ScottW > wrote:
> On May 22, 8:40*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
>>
> Why? *Because it's Arny's?
>
>
>
> > If *you are talking about his belief in Creationism, then
> > I ask, what is your position on Creationism?
>
> *Please define Creationism. That topic is tossed about
> without meaning far too often for reasonable discussion IMO.
>

The old Testament - the account in Genesis

Jenn[_2_]

May 24th 08, 01:58 AM

In article
>,
Clyde Slick > wrote:

> On 23 Mai, 12:33, ScottW > wrote:
> > On May 22, 8:40*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> >
> >>
> > Why? *Because it's Arny's?
> >
> >
> >
> > > If *you are talking about his belief in Creationism, then
> > > I ask, what is your position on Creationism?
> >
> > *Please define Creationism. That topic is tossed about
> > without meaning far too often for reasonable discussion IMO.
> >
>
> The old Testament - the account in Genesis

Actually there are two different creation accounts in Genesis.

Clyde Slick

May 24th 08, 02:03 AM

On 23 Mai, 20:58, Jenn > wrote:
> In article
> >,
> *Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 23 Mai, 12:33, ScottW > wrote:
> > > On May 22, 8:40*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > > Why? *Because it's Arny's?
>
> > > > If *you are talking about his belief in Creationism, then
> > > > I ask, what is your position on Creationism?
>
> > > *Please define Creationism. That topic is tossed about
> > > without meaning far too often for reasonable discussion IMO.
>
> > The old Testament - *the account in Genesis
>
> Actually there are two different creation accounts in Genesis.-

Then "at least" one of them is a lie!

Jenn[_2_]

May 24th 08, 02:10 AM

In article
>,
Clyde Slick > wrote:

> On 23 Mai, 20:58, Jenn > wrote:
> > In article
> > >,
> > *Clyde Slick > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On 23 Mai, 12:33, ScottW > wrote:
> > > > On May 22, 8:40*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> >
> > > > Why? *Because it's Arny's?
> >
> > > > > If *you are talking about his belief in Creationism, then
> > > > > I ask, what is your position on Creationism?
> >
> > > > *Please define Creationism. That topic is tossed about
> > > > without meaning far too often for reasonable discussion IMO.
> >
> > > The old Testament - *the account in Genesis
> >
> > Actually there are two different creation accounts in Genesis.-
>
> Then "at least" one of them is a lie!

Or just a different morality story.

John Atkinson[_2_]

May 24th 08, 02:52 AM

On May 23, 6:09 pm, John Atkinson > wrote:
> Stephen Milne and Bob Morein always post
>thoughtful and thought-provoking ideas.

Stephen _McElroy_. Sorry Stephen. Brainfade.

Thanks for the gentle correction, George.

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

May 24th 08, 03:31 AM

On May 23, 7:37*pm, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "John Atkinson" > wrote in
>
>
> > On May 23, 12:52 am, Jenn
> > > wrote:
> >> BTW, that said, the three best writers in the group are
> >> clearly George, Shhhh, and John, content not
> >> withstanding.
>
> > Thanks Jenn. I'm saddened that the usual suspects
> > judge writing ability by _what_ is written, not by _how_
> > it is written.
>
> Indeed John you should be saddened when posts are judged by what is written,
> because your posts are generally *written about nothing that matters in the
> larger scheme of things. Little or no audio content whatsever. Mostly about
> how hurt you are by certain people on this group.

I was proud of you for picking up on 2pid's irony earlier. I see now
you've missed it entirely in your own account.

Very sad, GOIA, very sad indeed. ;-(

George M. Middius[_4_]

May 24th 08, 03:37 AM

Shhhh! said:

> I was proud of you for picking up on 2pid's irony earlier. I see now
> you've missed it entirely in your own account.
> Very sad, GOIA, very sad indeed. ;-(

Arnii is getting ready to launch his Turd Of The Month Club bidniz. You
can order by aroma, by septic field, or by age. Success, at long last,
is within Turdy's grasp.

Clyde Slick

May 24th 08, 05:36 AM

On 23 Mai, 22:37, George M. Middius > wrote:
> Shhhh! said:
>
> > I was proud of you for picking up on 2pid's irony earlier. I see now
> > you've missed it entirely in your own account.
> > Very sad, GOIA, very sad indeed. ;-(
>
> Arnii is getting ready to launch his Turd Of The Month Club bidniz. You
> can order by aroma, by septic field, or by age. Success, at long last,
> is within Turdy's grasp.

you better send in your card,
or the big brown truck will be delivering you
Arny's special selection of the month,
list price, plus shipping and handling.

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

May 24th 08, 06:00 AM

On May 23, 11:36*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> On 23 Mai, 22:37, George M. Middius > wrote:
>
> > Shhhh! said:
>
> > > I was proud of you for picking up on 2pid's irony earlier. I see now
> > > you've missed it entirely in your own account.
> > > Very sad, GOIA, very sad indeed. ;-(
>
> > Arnii is getting ready to launch his Turd Of The Month Club bidniz. You
> > can order by aroma, by septic field, or by age. Success, at long last,
> > is within Turdy's grasp.
>
> you better send in your card,
> or the big brown truck will be delivering you
> Arny's *special selection of the month,
> list price, plus shipping and handling.

Does GOIA really charge a handling fee?

Ah, living the life of the modern day Life of Riley, doing something
one truly enjoys and getting paid for it.

"What a revoltin' development this is!"

UnsteadyKen

May 24th 08, 08:34 AM

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! said:

> "What a revoltin' development this is!"
>
Yeah, great innit?

Super service too, each order is acknowledged with a personaly
written email, mine read...

Your special gift is on it's way
I've posted off the parcel
I hope you like it very much
It's the contents of my arsehole.

I bought it as a gift for a friend before anybody comments.

--
Ken

Arny Krueger

May 24th 08, 11:17 AM

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message

> On 23 Mai, 12:33, ScottW > wrote:

>> Please define Creationism. That topic is tossed about
>> without meaning far too often for reasonable discussion
>> IMO.

> The old Testament - the account in Genesis

Wrong again. Creationism is a dogma that was invented by radical
fundamentalists, in the last few decades. Creationism attempts to explain
how the earth was created without mentioning evolution. The Bible is about
why and who, but generally not about the details of how.

Arny Krueger

May 24th 08, 11:19 AM

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message

> On 23 Mai, 20:58, Jenn >
> wrote:
>> In article
>> >,
>> Clyde Slick > wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 23 Mai, 12:33, ScottW > wrote:
>>>> On May 22, 8:40 pm, Clyde Slick
>>>> > wrote:
>>
>>>> Why? Because it's Arny's?
>>
>>>>> If you are talking about his belief in Creationism,
>>>>> then I ask, what is your position on Creationism?
>>
>>>> Please define Creationism. That topic is tossed about
>>>> without meaning far too often for reasonable
>>>> discussion IMO.
>>
>>> The old Testament - the account in Genesis
>>
>> Actually there are two different creation accounts in
>> Genesis.-

They are only different in detail.

> Then "at least" one of them is a lie!

In Art's little world all differences in perspective are intentional
falsehoods. That ****R hasn't called this insanity only shows what an unfair
and unqualified judge that he is.

Arny Krueger

May 24th 08, 11:20 AM

"MiNe 109" > wrote in message

> In article
> >,
> John Atkinson > wrote:
>
>> On May 23, 6:09 pm, John Atkinson
>> > wrote:
>>> Stephen Milne and Bob Morein always post
>>> thoughtful and thought-provoking ideas.
>>
>> Stephen _McElroy_. Sorry Stephen. Brainfade.
>>
>> Thanks for the gentle correction, George.
>
> No problem!
>
> Stephen

Note the cosmic suck-up. :-(

Clyde Slick

May 24th 08, 03:35 PM

On 24 Mai, 06:17, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> > On 23 Mai, 12:33, ScottW > wrote:
> >> Please define Creationism. That topic is tossed about
> >> without meaning far too often for reasonable discussion
> >> IMO.
> > The old Testament - *the account in Genesis
>
> Wrong again. Creationism is a dogma that was invented by radical
> fundamentalists, in the last few decades. *Creationism attempts to explain
> how the earth was created without mentioning evolution. The Bible is about
> why and who, but generally not about the details of how.

that's Creation Science you are talking about.
Another pile of ****

Clyde Slick

May 24th 08, 03:44 PM

On 24 Mai, 06:19, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 23 Mai, 20:58, Jenn >
> > wrote:
> >> In article
> >> >,
> >> Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> >>> On 23 Mai, 12:33, ScottW > wrote:
> >>>> On May 22, 8:40 pm, Clyde Slick
> >>>> > wrote:
>
> >>>> Why? Because it's Arny's?
>
> >>>>> If you are talking about his belief in Creationism,
> >>>>> then I ask, what is your position on Creationism?
>
> >>>> Please define Creationism. That topic is tossed about
> >>>> without meaning far too often for reasonable
> >>>> discussion IMO.
>
> >>> The old Testament - the account in Genesis
>
> >> Actually there are two different creation accounts in
> >> Genesis.-
>
> They are only different in detail.
>
> > Then "at least" one of them is a lie!
>
> In Art's little world all differences in perspective are intentional
> falsehoods. That ****R hasn't called this insanity only shows what an unfair
> and unqualified judge that he is.- \

I am convinced your insanity derives not from your
mother, but from the inner conflict between your
supposed belief in science, and your
Baptist style Christianity. Virgin births, an intervening God,
miracles, parting of the seas, Creation in seven days,
a 10,000 appx year old earth, parting of seas,
god talking to you, son of god
waling on earth as a man, resurrection, all of
this mumbo jumbo does not square with science.

Or maybe you really don't believe, and just
pretend, to please your wife, so you can keep getting
some of that prime 60+ tight pussy you like so much.

Arny Krueger

May 24th 08, 03:52 PM

"ScottW" > wrote in message

>> Do you know what "content not withstanding" means?

It means someone is sucking up.

> I do, and I don't agree that there is any merit to posts
> without substantive content no matter how well written you
> percieve them to be.

Agreed. A well-written post with zero or irrelevant content is like that
John Cage piece composed of silence, only worse because someone still put
for the effort to write that nonsense.

> All you've done is encourage more childish crap...

Comes with her territory in the Middiot posse.

> and it's somewhat staggering that you can find vacuous posts
> with no purpose well written.

Prizing form over function is at best questionable, prizing form over
dysfunction is pretty strange.

However, I'm not surprised to see Atkinson praising form over dysfunction
because that is what his day job seems to me.

Arny Krueger

May 24th 08, 04:00 PM

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message

> I am convinced your insanity

So rants one of the inmates in the Middiot's insane asylum...

> derives not from your
> mother, but from the inner conflict between your
> supposed belief in science,

Come on Art, for your post to make any sense at all you have to decide
whether I believe in science or not.

> and your Baptist style Christianity.

Yes Art, my Christian beliefs that you have demonstrated your ignorance of
and misapprehensions about again and again.

> Virgin births,

Parthenogenesis is the scientific word.

> an intervening God,

"Acts of God" is the legal term.

> miracles,

You obviously don't know it Art, but you just said that.

> parting of the seas,

Another repetition of "an intervening God" as you put it.

> Creation in seven days,

Another repetition of "an intervening God" as you put it.

> a 10,000 appx year old earth,

That's not found in the Bible.

> parting of seas,

Another repetition of "an intervening God" as you put it, not to mention
another repetition of "parting of the seas".

> god talking to you,

Yet another repetition of "an intervening God".

> son of god waling on earth as a man,

Yet another repetition of "an intervening God".

> resurrection,

Yet another repetition of "an intervening God". When will you come up with
another salient point, Art?

> all of this mumbo jumbo does not square with science.

Prove it.

> Or maybe you really don't believe, and just
> pretend, to please your wife, so you can keep getting
> some of that prime 60+ tight pussy you like so much.

Sue me for enjoying married life, Art. Here's a news flash that you
obviously need, there is something to say for having a stable situation with
your life's partner. Too bad about your situation - obviously you aren't
getting any if you are obsessing over my enjoyment of life.

Arny Krueger

May 24th 08, 04:02 PM

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message

> On 24 Mai, 06:17, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 23 Mai, 12:33, ScottW > wrote:
>>>> Please define Creationism. That topic is tossed about
>>>> without meaning far too often for reasonable discussion
>>>> IMO.
>>> The old Testament - the account in Genesis
>>
>> Wrong again. Creationism is a dogma that was invented by
>> radical fundamentalists, in the last few decades.
>> Creationism attempts to explain how the earth was
>> created without mentioning evolution. The Bible is about
>> why and who, but generally not about the details of how.

> that's Creation Science you are talking about.

Your point?

> Another pile of ****

I don't completely disagree with the general idea. However the form of
expression is typical of the Middiot's coprophiliac posse.

Arny Krueger

May 24th 08, 04:03 PM

"ScottW" > wrote in message

> On May 23, 5:53 pm, Clyde Slick >
> wrote:
>> On 23 Mai, 12:33, ScottW > wrote:
>>
>>> On May 22, 8:40 pm, Clyde Slick
>>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Why? Because it's Arny's?
>>
>>>> If you are talking about his belief in Creationism,
>>>> then I ask, what is your position on Creationism?
>>
>>> Please define Creationism. That topic is tossed about
>>> without meaning far too often for reasonable discussion
>>> IMO.
>>
>> The old Testament - the account in Genesis
>
> It's clear to me a literal interpretation and debate
> today of a work created
> over a thousand years for people over 2000 years ago is
> a futile discussion.

It's about as close as Art can possibly come to be interesting to me, let
alone relevant to the forum.

Clyde Slick

May 24th 08, 04:31 PM

On 24 Mai, 11:00, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> > I am convinced *your insanity
>
> So rants one of the inmates in the Middiot's insane asylum...
>
> > *derives not from your
> > mother, but from the inner conflict between your
> > supposed belief in science,
>
> Come on Art, for your post to make any sense at all you have to decide
> whether I believe in science or not.
>
> > *and your Baptist style Christianity.
>
> Yes Art, my Christian beliefs that *you have demonstrated your ignorance of
> and misapprehensions about again and again.
>
> > *Virgin births,
>
> Parthenogenesis is the scientific word.
>
> > *an intervening God,
>
> "Acts of God" is the legal term.
>
> > miracles,
>
> You obviously don't know it Art, but you just said that.
>
> > parting of the seas,
>
> Another repetition of "an intervening God" as you put it.
>
> > *Creation in seven days,
>
> Another repetition of "an intervening God" as you put it.
>
> > a 10,000 appx year old earth,
>
> That's not found in the Bible.
>
> > *parting of seas,
>
> Another repetition of "an intervening God" as you put it, not to mention
> another repetition of "parting of the seas".
>
> > *god talking to you,
>
> Yet another repetition of "an intervening God".
>
> > *son of god waling on earth as a man,
>
> Yet another repetition of "an intervening God".
>
> > resurrection,
>
> Yet another repetition of "an intervening God". *When will you come up with
> another salient point, Art?
>
> > all of *this mumbo jumbo does not square with science.
>
> Prove it.
>
> > Or maybe you really don't believe, and just
> > pretend, to please your wife, so you can keep getting
> > some of that prime 60+ tight *pussy you like so much.
>
> Sue me for enjoying married life, Art. Here's a news flash that you
> obviously need, there is something to say for having a stable situation with
> your life's partner. Too bad about your situation - obviously you aren't
> getting any if you are obsessing over my enjoyment of life.

I'll up you 5 debating trade points:
sue me, I took a five minute break form my latest ****fest

now get back to the point and reconcile science, jesus, and God's
miracles.

Jenn[_2_]

May 24th 08, 05:05 PM

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On May 23, 5:09*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > In article
> > >,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > On May 23, 11:20*am, George M. Middius >
> > > wrote:
> > > > Time for another bout of irrational yapping.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > What is my "dirty work" Arny?
> >
> > > > > > > > > Trying to be dominant.
> >
> > > > > > > > Bingo! Called it!
> >
> > > > > > > Very good call. For the life of me I can't see where Mr. Kreuger
> > > > > > > gets
> > > > > > > that idea though. Maybe it stems from the bad experiences he had
> > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > high
> > > > > > > school with those mean teenage girls?
> >
> > > > > > Yep. There has to be a connection. Too bad we can't look at his
> > > > > > mother's
> > > > > > psychiatric record.
> >
> > > > > *If he was truly sick, how sick are you for wanting to look at this?
> >
> > > > Scottie, the lesson you should have drawn from your meltdown yesterday
> > > > is that the impulses that flit through your dim little "mind" are not
> > > > comprehensible thoughts. First, nobody else has any idea why you are
> > > > inferring that the Krooborg "was" sick, when we all know it ***IS***
> > > > sick.
> >
> > > * And if you know this, it's sick of you to want to examine
> > > his family history.
> >
> > > *All the shallow eloquence in the world can't hide your
> > > twisted sadistic perversions.
> > > Well, maybe from Jenn it does.
> >
> > > ScottW
> >
> > Do you know what "content not withstanding" means?
>
> I do, and I don't agree that there is any merit to posts
> without substantive content no matter how well written you
> percieve them to be.
> All you've done is encourage more childish crap and it's
> somewhat staggering that you can find vacuous posts
> with no purpose well written.
>
> ScottW

You might not agree, but most people know that there is a technique to
writing. William Pierce's books are well-written.

Jenn[_2_]

May 24th 08, 05:06 PM

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "ScottW" > wrote in message
>
>
> >> Do you know what "content not withstanding" means?
>
> It means someone is sucking up.

No, it means that there is good writing, regardless of content. I'm
sorry that you don't understand that.

Arny Krueger

May 24th 08, 05:20 PM

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message

> On 24 Mai, 11:00, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>>
>>
>>
>>> I am convinced your insanity
>>
>> So rants one of the inmates in the Middiot's insane
>> asylum...
>>
>>> derives not from your
>>> mother, but from the inner conflict between your
>>> supposed belief in science,
>>
>> Come on Art, for your post to make any sense at all you
>> have to decide whether I believe in science or not.
>>
>>> and your Baptist style Christianity.
>>
>> Yes Art, my Christian beliefs that you have demonstrated
>> your ignorance of and misapprehensions about again and
>> again.
>>
>>> Virgin births,
>>
>> Parthenogenesis is the scientific word.
>>
>>> an intervening God,
>>
>> "Acts of God" is the legal term.
>>
>>> miracles,
>>
>> You obviously don't know it Art, but you just said that.
>>
>>> parting of the seas,
>>
>> Another repetition of "an intervening God" as you put it.
>>
>>> Creation in seven days,
>>
>> Another repetition of "an intervening God" as you put it.
>>
>>> a 10,000 appx year old earth,
>>
>> That's not found in the Bible.
>>
>>> parting of seas,
>>
>> Another repetition of "an intervening God" as you put
>> it, not to mention another repetition of "parting of the
>> seas".
>>
>>> god talking to you,
>>
>> Yet another repetition of "an intervening God".
>>
>>> son of god waling on earth as a man,
>>
>> Yet another repetition of "an intervening God".
>>
>>> resurrection,
>>
>> Yet another repetition of "an intervening God". When
>> will you come up with another salient point, Art?
>>
>>> all of this mumbo jumbo does not square with science.
>>
>> Prove it.
>>
>>> Or maybe you really don't believe, and just
>>> pretend, to please your wife, so you can keep getting
>>> some of that prime 60+ tight pussy you like so much.
>>
>> Sue me for enjoying married life, Art. Here's a news
>> flash that you obviously need, there is something to say
>> for having a stable situation with your life's partner.
>> Too bad about your situation - obviously you aren't
>> getting any if you are obsessing over my enjoyment of
>> life.
>
>
> I'll up you 5 debating trade points:
> sue me, I took a five minute break form my latest ****fest

IOW, you ate a piece of raw calf's liver.

No sale!

> now get back to the point and reconcile science, jesus,
> and God's miracles.

Art, you're trapped in a loop.

Jenn[_2_]

May 24th 08, 05:21 PM

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On May 24, 9:06*am, Jenn > wrote:
> > In article >,
> > *"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > "ScottW" > wrote in message
> >
> >
> > > >> Do you know what "content not withstanding" means?
> >
> > > It means someone is sucking up.
> >
> > No, it means that there is good writing, regardless of content.
>
> On the grand scale, content is 10.
> Good writing is a browny point.
>
> ScottW

I know that you don't value good writing very much. IIRC, you pointed
out that someone at your work was fired due to putting too much emphasis
on spelling, or something like that. I certainly agree that content is
the most important thing. I'm simply stating that good writing skill
exists around here.

George M. Middius[_4_]

May 24th 08, 05:24 PM

The Idiot yapped:

> > No, it means that there is good writing, regardless of content.

> On the grand scale, content is 10.

Coincidentally, your lack of writing skill is striking. Oh wait, I
forgot -- the rest of us don't have sufficient reading skill to
comprehend your artistic flights. Whew! That was close.

> Good writing is a browny[sic] point.

Self-mockery noted.

Arny Krueger

May 24th 08, 05:25 PM

"Jenn" > wrote in message

> In article >,
> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
>> "ScottW" > wrote in message
>>
>>
>>>> Do you know what "content not withstanding" means?
>>
>> It means someone is sucking up.
>
> No, it means that there is good writing, regardless of
> content.

Avoiding the obvioius question, is it even possible to have good writing
with zero or negligable relevant content? I can see why you want to avoid
this question, Jenn.

> I'm sorry that you don't understand that.

No, I was at least one move ahead of you, Jenn.

Jenn[_2_]

May 24th 08, 05:28 PM

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> > In article >,
> > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> >> "ScottW" > wrote in message
> >>
> >>
> >>>> Do you know what "content not withstanding" means?
> >>
> >> It means someone is sucking up.
> >
> > No, it means that there is good writing, regardless of
> > content.
>
> Avoiding the obvioius question, is it even possible to have good writing
> with zero or negligable relevant content? I can see why you want to avoid
> this question, Jenn.

What I'll "avoid" is pointing out how your... never mind; it's not
worth the effort. To answer your question above: Yes, it is possible
to have good writing with zero relevant content. There is a technique
to writing that the people I named (and others) display.

>
> > I'm sorry that you don't understand that.
>
> No, I was at least one move ahead of you, Jenn.

lol

Arny Krueger

May 24th 08, 05:31 PM

"Jenn" > wrote in message

> I know that you don't value good writing very much.

You *know* lots of things you made up, Jenn.

> IIRC, you pointed out that someone at your work was fired
> due to putting too much emphasis on spelling, or
> something like that.

Your conclusion does not follow from the evidence, Jenn. However, I
question whether you really grasp the idea of evidence. With your current
stated set of values, you might get a document that is full of lies or
irrelvant information but with great sentence structure and spelling. A
second document would be poorly written but loaded with relevant
information. The writing and spelling would be poor, but the content could
easily remain quite clear to anybody who could get past the obvious flaws.

Jenn would likely believe the lies and ignore the truth, because the truth
was inartfully expressed.

> I certainly agree that content is the most important thing.

Lip service, no doubt.

> I'm simply stating that good writing skill exists around here.

Not with the individuals stated because they are so content-challenged.

Then of course we have Art, who gets no points for truth or form. His only
possible claim to value comes from his ability to suck up to the Middiot and
attack his enemies. And in the cosmic scheme of things, that is negative
value.

Jenn[_2_]

May 24th 08, 05:51 PM

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On May 24, 9:05*am, Jenn > wrote:
> > In article
> > >,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > On May 23, 5:09*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > >,
> >
> > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > On May 23, 11:20*am, George M. Middius >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > Time for another bout of irrational yapping.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > What is my "dirty work" Arny?
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > Trying to be dominant.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > Bingo! Called it!
> >
> > > > > > > > > Very good call. For the life of me I can't see where Mr.
> > > > > > > > > Kreuger
> > > > > > > > > gets
> > > > > > > > > that idea though. Maybe it stems from the bad experiences he
> > > > > > > > > had
> > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > high
> > > > > > > > > school with those mean teenage girls?
> >
> > > > > > > > Yep. There has to be a connection. Too bad we can't look at his
> > > > > > > > mother's
> > > > > > > > psychiatric record.
> >
> > > > > > > *If he was truly sick, how sick are you for wanting to look at
> > > > > > > this?
> >
> > > > > > Scottie, the lesson you should have drawn from your meltdown
> > > > > > yesterday
> > > > > > is that the impulses that flit through your dim little "mind" are
> > > > > > not
> > > > > > comprehensible thoughts. First, nobody else has any idea why you
> > > > > > are
> > > > > > inferring that the Krooborg "was" sick, when we all know it
> > > > > > ***IS***
> > > > > > sick.
> >
> > > > > * And if you know this, it's sick of you to want to examine
> > > > > his family history.
> >
> > > > > *All the shallow eloquence in the world can't hide your
> > > > > twisted sadistic perversions.
> > > > > Well, maybe from Jenn it does.
> >
> > > > > ScottW
> >
> > > > Do you know what "content not withstanding" means?
> >
> > > *I do, and I don't agree that there is any merit to posts
> > > without substantive content no matter how well written you
> > > percieve them to be.
> > > *All you've done is encourage more childish crap and it's
> > > somewhat staggering that you can find vacuous posts
> > > with no purpose well written.
> >
> > > ScottW
> >
> > You might not agree, but most people know that there is a technique to
> > writing.
>
> Most people know there is not "a" technique to writing but many
> techniques and the appropriate one is determined by the purpose of the
> writing.
> Middiot has no purpose other than his own personal amusement and your
> playing his puppet with this acknowledgement of his inappropriately
> applied
> technique.
>
>
> >*William Pierce's books are well-written.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Luther_Pierce
>
>
> Studying the White Separatist National Alliance in your spare time?

I've read all of his books, and many others of that ilk, yes.

George M. Middius[_4_]

May 24th 08, 05:51 PM

Yapper barked:

> > *I'm simply stating that good writing skill exists around here.

> If anything, good writing skill is abused around here.
> There is nothing commendable in [George the Great's] posts.

That's where you're mistaken, O Greatly Stupid Moron. Many, many newbies
have written to thank me for alerting them to your overarching stupidity.
Some of them thought your stupid comments were trolls, and others thought
you might be one of those passive-aggressive provocateurs. But it was my
(and others') willingness to call a spade a spade that enabled the newbies
to figure out that you're exactly what you seem to be: a brazen,
uninhibited moron.

Harry Lavo

May 24th 08, 06:57 PM

"Jenn" > wrote in message
...
> In article
> >,
> ScottW > wrote:
>
>> On May 23, 5:09 pm, Jenn > wrote:
>> > In article
>> > >,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ScottW > wrote:
>> > > On May 23, 11:20 am, George M. Middius >
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > Time for another bout of irrational yapping.
>> >
>> > > > > > > > > > What is my "dirty work" Arny?
>> >
>> > > > > > > > > Trying to be dominant.
>> >
>> > > > > > > > Bingo! Called it!
>> >
>> > > > > > > Very good call. For the life of me I can't see where Mr.
>> > > > > > > Kreuger
>> > > > > > > gets
>> > > > > > > that idea though. Maybe it stems from the bad experiences he
>> > > > > > > had
>> > > > > > > in
>> > > > > > > high
>> > > > > > > school with those mean teenage girls?
>> >
>> > > > > > Yep. There has to be a connection. Too bad we can't look at his
>> > > > > > mother's
>> > > > > > psychiatric record.
>> >
>> > > > > If he was truly sick, how sick are you for wanting to look at
>> > > > > this?
>> >
>> > > > Scottie, the lesson you should have drawn from your meltdown
>> > > > yesterday
>> > > > is that the impulses that flit through your dim little "mind" are
>> > > > not
>> > > > comprehensible thoughts. First, nobody else has any idea why you
>> > > > are
>> > > > inferring that the Krooborg "was" sick, when we all know it
>> > > > ***IS***
>> > > > sick.
>> >
>> > > And if you know this, it's sick of you to want to examine
>> > > his family history.
>> >
>> > > All the shallow eloquence in the world can't hide your
>> > > twisted sadistic perversions.
>> > > Well, maybe from Jenn it does.
>> >
>> > > ScottW
>> >
>> > Do you know what "content not withstanding" means?
>>
>> I do, and I don't agree that there is any merit to posts
>> without substantive content no matter how well written you
>> percieve them to be.
>> All you've done is encourage more childish crap and it's
>> somewhat staggering that you can find vacuous posts
>> with no purpose well written.
>>
>> ScottW
>
> You might not agree, but most people know that there is a technique to
> writing. William Pierce's books are well-written.

Strunk and White have something to say about that.

Jenn[_2_]

May 24th 08, 06:59 PM

In article >,
"Harry Lavo" > wrote:

> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> ...
> > In article
> > >,
> > ScottW > wrote:
> >
> >> On May 23, 5:09 pm, Jenn > wrote:
> >> > In article
> >> > >,
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ScottW > wrote:
> >> > > On May 23, 11:20 am, George M. Middius >
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > > Time for another bout of irrational yapping.
> >> >
> >> > > > > > > > > > What is my "dirty work" Arny?
> >> >
> >> > > > > > > > > Trying to be dominant.
> >> >
> >> > > > > > > > Bingo! Called it!
> >> >
> >> > > > > > > Very good call. For the life of me I can't see where Mr.
> >> > > > > > > Kreuger
> >> > > > > > > gets
> >> > > > > > > that idea though. Maybe it stems from the bad experiences he
> >> > > > > > > had
> >> > > > > > > in
> >> > > > > > > high
> >> > > > > > > school with those mean teenage girls?
> >> >
> >> > > > > > Yep. There has to be a connection. Too bad we can't look at his
> >> > > > > > mother's
> >> > > > > > psychiatric record.
> >> >
> >> > > > > If he was truly sick, how sick are you for wanting to look at
> >> > > > > this?
> >> >
> >> > > > Scottie, the lesson you should have drawn from your meltdown
> >> > > > yesterday
> >> > > > is that the impulses that flit through your dim little "mind" are
> >> > > > not
> >> > > > comprehensible thoughts. First, nobody else has any idea why you
> >> > > > are
> >> > > > inferring that the Krooborg "was" sick, when we all know it
> >> > > > ***IS***
> >> > > > sick.
> >> >
> >> > > And if you know this, it's sick of you to want to examine
> >> > > his family history.
> >> >
> >> > > All the shallow eloquence in the world can't hide your
> >> > > twisted sadistic perversions.
> >> > > Well, maybe from Jenn it does.
> >> >
> >> > > ScottW
> >> >
> >> > Do you know what "content not withstanding" means?
> >>
> >> I do, and I don't agree that there is any merit to posts
> >> without substantive content no matter how well written you
> >> percieve them to be.
> >> All you've done is encourage more childish crap and it's
> >> somewhat staggering that you can find vacuous posts
> >> with no purpose well written.
> >>
> >> ScottW
> >
> > You might not agree, but most people know that there is a technique to
> > writing. William Pierce's books are well-written.
>
> Strunk and White have something to say about that.

Indeed.

Clyde Slick

May 24th 08, 08:41 PM

On 24 Mai, 12:20, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 24 Mai, 11:00, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>> I am convinced your insanity
>
> >> So rants one of the inmates in the Middiot's insane
> >> asylum...
>
> >>> derives not from your
> >>> mother, but from the inner conflict between your
> >>> supposed belief in science,
>
> >> Come on Art, for your post to make any sense at all you
> >> have to decide whether I believe in science or not.
>
> >>> and your Baptist style Christianity.
>
> >> Yes Art, my Christian beliefs that you have demonstrated
> >> your ignorance of and misapprehensions about again and
> >> again.
>
> >>> Virgin births,
>
> >> Parthenogenesis is the scientific word.
>
> >>> an intervening God,
>
> >> "Acts of God" is the legal term.
>
> >>> miracles,
>
> >> You obviously don't know it Art, but you just said that.
>
> >>> parting of the seas,
>
> >> Another repetition of "an intervening God" as you put it.
>
> >>> Creation in seven days,
>
> >> Another repetition of "an intervening God" as you put it.
>
> >>> a 10,000 appx year old earth,
>
> >> That's not found in the Bible.
>
> >>> parting of seas,
>
> >> Another repetition of "an intervening God" as you put
> >> it, not to mention another repetition of "parting of the
> >> seas".
>
> >>> god talking to you,
>
> >> Yet another repetition of "an intervening God".
>
> >>> son of god waling on earth as a man,
>
> >> Yet another repetition of "an intervening God".
>
> >>> resurrection,
>
> >> Yet another repetition of "an intervening God". When
> >> will you come up with another salient point, Art?
>
> >>> all of this mumbo jumbo does not square with science.
>
> >> Prove it.
>
> >>> Or maybe you really don't believe, and just
> >>> pretend, to please your wife, so you can keep getting
> >>> some of that prime 60+ tight pussy you like so much.
>
> >> Sue me for enjoying married life, Art. Here's a news
> >> flash that you obviously need, there is something to say
> >> for having a stable situation with your life's partner.
> >> Too bad about your situation - obviously you aren't
> >> getting any if you are obsessing over my enjoyment of
> >> life.
>
> > I'll up you 5 debating trade points:
> > sue me, I took a five minute break form my latest ****fest
>
> IOW, you ate a piece of raw calf's liver.
>
> No sale!
>
> > now get back to the point and reconcile science, jesus,
> > and God's miracles.
>
> Art, you're trapped in a loop.-
I'm on your ass until you answer the question.

BTW, engineers should be forced to renounce
religion before they are allowed to practice.
I don't want people like you, who talk with Jesus
and believe in miracle fairy tales
to be designing the planes I fly in,
the cars I drive, and the bridges I drive over.

Even worse is if they design the audio stuff
I listen to. We can't have that kind of people
who believe in mumbo jumbo rubbish in audio, can we!!!!!

Clyde Slick

May 24th 08, 08:43 PM

On 24 Mai, 12:31, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:

>
> Then of course we have Art, who gets no points for truth or form. His only
> possible claim to value comes from his ability to suck up to the Middiot and
> attack his enemies. And in the cosmic scheme of things, that is negative
> value.

Improper use of plural noted!!!
I only have one enemy.

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

May 24th 08, 11:09 PM

On May 24, 5:19*am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 23 Mai, 20:58, Jenn >
> > wrote:
> >> In article
> >> >,
> >> Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> >>> On 23 Mai, 12:33, ScottW > wrote:
> >>>> On May 22, 8:40 pm, Clyde Slick
> >>>> > wrote:
>
> >>>> Why? Because it's Arny's?
>
> >>>>> If you are talking about his belief in Creationism,
> >>>>> then I ask, what is your position on Creationism?
>
> >>>> Please define Creationism. That topic is tossed about
> >>>> without meaning far too often for reasonable
> >>>> discussion IMO.
>
> >>> The old Testament - the account in Genesis
>
> >> Actually there are two different creation accounts in
> >> Genesis.-
>
> They are only different in detail.
>
> > Then "at least" one of them is a lie!
>
> In Art's little world all differences in perspective are intentional
> falsehoods. That ****R hasn't called this insanity only shows what an unfair
> and unqualified judge that he is.

****R thinks that unsupported beliefs in supernatural powers is one
definition of insanity, GOIA, especially when one butchers it like you
do. ****R thinks that Scientology and Christianity and a belief in
Spiderman as a moral guide to get into "Heaven" are equally valid
belief systems. None is very rational.

Now, as an aid in helping prove your 'sanity', why don't you tell me
how Christianity is "true" and Scientology and a belief in Spiderman
are "hokum"? If you can do this logically, and without using the word
"faith" or circular reasoning, I'll even stop calling you "insane". Do
we have a deal?

You compound your own errors in reasoning.

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

May 24th 08, 11:10 PM

On May 24, 5:20*am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "MiNe 109" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article
> > >,
> > John Atkinson > wrote:
>
> >> On May 23, 6:09 pm, John Atkinson
> >> > wrote:
> >>> Stephen Milne and Bob Morein always post
> >>> thoughtful and thought-provoking ideas.
>
> >> Stephen _McElroy_. Sorry Stephen. Brainfade.
>
> >> Thanks for the gentle correction, George.
>
> > No problem!
>
> > Stephen
>
> Note the cosmic suck-up. :-(

Yes, accepting someone's apology *is* a little out there for me too. :-
(

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

May 24th 08, 11:12 PM

On May 24, 9:46*am, ScottW > wrote:

> *it's somewhat staggering that you can find vacuous posts
> with no purpose well written.

It's equally staggering when someone posts poorly-written vacuous
posts and then claims that they are "equally valid".

Hint: stupidity is not simply a "differing POV". ;-)

LoL

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

May 24th 08, 11:18 PM

On May 24, 11:11*am, ScottW > wrote:

> > No, it means that there is good writing, regardless of content.
>
> On the grand scale, content is 10.
> Good writing is a browny point.

We know why you feel that way, 2pid. It's because you cannot write,
cannot communicate, and cannot understand words. You're envious.

You feel that your posts have "deep thoughts" (and in the SNL view,
they do), but that they aren't expressed very well. The truth is that
they do not have "deep thoughts" AND they are not well-written.

I'm very sorry to break this to you, but that is the primary reason
you get laughed at so much. Poorly expressed expositions of poorly-
thought-out positions are not very compelling.

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

May 24th 08, 11:21 PM

On May 24, 11:51*am, Jenn > wrote:
> In article
> >,
>
>
>
>
>
> *ScottW > wrote:
> > On May 24, 9:05*am, Jenn > wrote:
> > > In article
> > > >,
>
> > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > On May 23, 5:09*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > > In article
> > > > > >,
>
> > > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > > On May 23, 11:20*am, George M. Middius >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > Time for another bout of irrational yapping.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > What is my "dirty work" Arny?
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Trying to be dominant.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > Bingo! Called it!
>
> > > > > > > > > > Very good call. For the life of me I can't see where Mr.
> > > > > > > > > > Kreuger
> > > > > > > > > > gets
> > > > > > > > > > that idea though. Maybe it stems from the bad experiences he
> > > > > > > > > > had
> > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > high
> > > > > > > > > > school with those mean teenage girls?
>
> > > > > > > > > Yep. There has to be a connection. Too bad we can't look at his
> > > > > > > > > mother's
> > > > > > > > > psychiatric record.
>
> > > > > > > > *If he was truly sick, how sick are you for wanting to look at
> > > > > > > > this?
>
> > > > > > > Scottie, the lesson you should have drawn from your meltdown
> > > > > > > yesterday
> > > > > > > is that the impulses that flit through your dim little "mind" are
> > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > comprehensible thoughts. First, nobody else has any idea why you
> > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > inferring that the Krooborg "was" sick, when we all know it
> > > > > > > ***IS***
> > > > > > > sick.
>
> > > > > > * And if you know this, it's sick of you to want to examine
> > > > > > his family history.
>
> > > > > > *All the shallow eloquence in the world can't hide your
> > > > > > twisted sadistic perversions.
> > > > > > Well, maybe from Jenn it does.
>
> > > > > > ScottW
>
> > > > > Do you know what "content not withstanding" means?
>
> > > > *I do, and I don't agree that there is any merit to posts
> > > > without substantive content no matter how well written you
> > > > percieve them to be.
> > > > *All you've done is encourage more childish crap and it's
> > > > somewhat staggering that you can find vacuous posts
> > > > with no purpose well written.
>
> > > > ScottW
>
> > > You might not agree, but most people know that there is a technique to
> > > writing.
>
> > Most people know there is not "a" technique to writing but many
> > techniques and the appropriate one is determined by the purpose of the
> > writing.
> > Middiot has no purpose other than his own personal amusement and your
> > playing his puppet with this acknowledgement of his inappropriately
> > applied
> > technique.
>
> > >*William Pierce's books are well-written.
>
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Luther_Pierce
>
> > Studying the White Separatist National Alliance in your spare time?
>
> I've read all of his books, and many others of that ilk, yes.

You're supposed to avoid things you disagree with, Jenn. I'm very
disappointed in you. :-(

George M. Middius[_4_]

May 25th 08, 12:27 AM

Shhhh! said to duh-Scottie:

> I'm very sorry to break this to you, but that is the primary reason
> you get laughed at so much. Poorly expressed expositions of poorly-
> thought-out positions are not very compelling.

There you go being mean to Scottie again. You know the poor thing's
"values" don't allow him to understand POVs that conflict with his own.
I think you're deliberately trying to torment him. For shame.

BTW, the Krooborg uttered a death threat on another newsgroup. I hope they
report him to the authorities.

George M. Middius[_4_]

May 25th 08, 01:28 AM

MiNe 109 said:

> Lord! I guess Arny's not used to receiving apologies, or thinks them a
> weakness to exploit.

Comes from never being wrong, I suspect.

Jenn[_2_]

May 25th 08, 03:41 AM

In article
>,
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote:

> On May 24, 11:51*am, Jenn > wrote:
> > In article
> > >,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > On May 24, 9:05*am, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > >,
> >
> > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > On May 23, 5:09*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > > > In article
> > > > > > >,
> >
> > > > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > > > On May 23, 11:20*am, George M. Middius >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > Time for another bout of irrational yapping.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > What is my "dirty work" Arny?
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Trying to be dominant.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Bingo! Called it!
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > Very good call. For the life of me I can't see where Mr.
> > > > > > > > > > > Kreuger
> > > > > > > > > > > gets
> > > > > > > > > > > that idea though. Maybe it stems from the bad experiences
> > > > > > > > > > > he
> > > > > > > > > > > had
> > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > high
> > > > > > > > > > > school with those mean teenage girls?
> >
> > > > > > > > > > Yep. There has to be a connection. Too bad we can't look at
> > > > > > > > > > his
> > > > > > > > > > mother's
> > > > > > > > > > psychiatric record.
> >
> > > > > > > > > *If he was truly sick, how sick are you for wanting to look
> > > > > > > > > at
> > > > > > > > > this?
> >
> > > > > > > > Scottie, the lesson you should have drawn from your meltdown
> > > > > > > > yesterday
> > > > > > > > is that the impulses that flit through your dim little "mind"
> > > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > comprehensible thoughts. First, nobody else has any idea why
> > > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > inferring that the Krooborg "was" sick, when we all know it
> > > > > > > > ***IS***
> > > > > > > > sick.
> >
> > > > > > > * And if you know this, it's sick of you to want to examine
> > > > > > > his family history.
> >
> > > > > > > *All the shallow eloquence in the world can't hide your
> > > > > > > twisted sadistic perversions.
> > > > > > > Well, maybe from Jenn it does.
> >
> > > > > > > ScottW
> >
> > > > > > Do you know what "content not withstanding" means?
> >
> > > > > *I do, and I don't agree that there is any merit to posts
> > > > > without substantive content no matter how well written you
> > > > > percieve them to be.
> > > > > *All you've done is encourage more childish crap and it's
> > > > > somewhat staggering that you can find vacuous posts
> > > > > with no purpose well written.
> >
> > > > > ScottW
> >
> > > > You might not agree, but most people know that there is a technique to
> > > > writing.
> >
> > > Most people know there is not "a" technique to writing but many
> > > techniques and the appropriate one is determined by the purpose of the
> > > writing.
> > > Middiot has no purpose other than his own personal amusement and your
> > > playing his puppet with this acknowledgement of his inappropriately
> > > applied
> > > technique.
> >
> > > >*William Pierce's books are well-written.
> >
> > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Luther_Pierce
> >
> > > Studying the White Separatist National Alliance in your spare time?
> >
> > I've read all of his books, and many others of that ilk, yes.
>
> You're supposed to avoid things you disagree with, Jenn.

Oh, right. Sorry.

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

May 25th 08, 07:45 PM

On May 24, 6:27*pm, George M. Middius >
wrote:
> Shhhh! said to duh-Scottie:
>
> > I'm very sorry to break this to you, but that is the primary reason
> > you get laughed at so much. Poorly expressed expositions of poorly-
> > thought-out positions are not very compelling.
>
> There you go being mean to Scottie again. You know the poor thing's
> "values" don't allow him to understand POVs that conflict with his own.
> I think you're deliberately trying to torment him. For shame.

I'm a sadist. 2pid proved that earlier.

And since it's obviously ;-) the case that I'm into kinky sex, I'm
probably gay too. To think otherwise would be absurd. ;-)

> BTW, the Krooborg uttered a death threat on another newsgroup. I hope they
> report him to the authorities.

Did somebody offer a different POV from GOIA's? If that's the case,
they probably deserved it.

George M. Middius[_4_]

May 25th 08, 08:43 PM

Shhhh! said:

> > BTW, the Krooborg uttered a death threat on another newsgroup. I hope they
> > report him to the authorities.
>
> Did somebody offer a different POV from GOIA's? If that's the case,
> they probably deserved it.

This time of year, it doesn't take much to light Turdy's fuse. The trigger
could have been something as commonplace as a guy asking Arnii to set up a
quickie with the Kroobitch.

Arny Krueger

May 26th 08, 12:17 PM

"Jenn" > wrote in message

> In article
> >,
> ScottW > wrote:
>
>> On May 24, 9:05 am, Jenn
>> > wrote:
>>> In article
>>> >,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ScottW > wrote:
>>>> On May 23, 5:09 pm, Jenn
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>> In article
>>>>> >,
>>>
>>>>> ScottW > wrote:
>>>>>> On May 23, 11:20 am, George M. Middius
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>> Time for another bout of irrational yapping.
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> What is my "dirty work" Arny?
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Trying to be dominant.
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Bingo! Called it!
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Very good call. For the life of me I can't see
>>>>>>>>>> where Mr. Kreuger
>>>>>>>>>> gets
>>>>>>>>>> that idea though. Maybe it stems from the bad
>>>>>>>>>> experiences he had
>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>> high
>>>>>>>>>> school with those mean teenage girls?
>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yep. There has to be a connection. Too bad we
>>>>>>>>> can't look at his mother's
>>>>>>>>> psychiatric record.
>>>
>>>>>>>> If he was truly sick, how sick are you for wanting
>>>>>>>> to look at this?
>>>
>>>>>>> Scottie, the lesson you should have drawn from your
>>>>>>> meltdown yesterday
>>>>>>> is that the impulses that flit through your dim
>>>>>>> little "mind" are not
>>>>>>> comprehensible thoughts. First, nobody else has any
>>>>>>> idea why you are
>>>>>>> inferring that the Krooborg "was" sick, when we all
>>>>>>> know it ***IS***
>>>>>>> sick.
>>>
>>>>>> And if you know this, it's sick of you to want to
>>>>>> examine
>>>>>> his family history.
>>>
>>>>>> All the shallow eloquence in the world can't hide
>>>>>> your
>>>>>> twisted sadistic perversions.
>>>>>> Well, maybe from Jenn it does.
>>>
>>>>>> ScottW
>>>
>>>>> Do you know what "content not withstanding" means?
>>>
>>>> I do, and I don't agree that there is any merit to
>>>> posts without substantive content no matter how well
>>>> written you percieve them to be.
>>>> All you've done is encourage more childish crap and
>>>> it's somewhat staggering that you can find vacuous
>>>> posts
>>>> with no purpose well written.
>>>
>>>> ScottW
>>>
>>> You might not agree, but most people know that there is
>>> a technique to writing.
>>
>> Most people know there is not "a" technique to writing
>> but many techniques and the appropriate one is
>> determined by the purpose of the writing.
>> Middiot has no purpose other than his own personal
>> amusement and your playing his puppet with this
>> acknowledgement of his inappropriately applied
>> technique.
>
>>> William Pierce's books are well-written.

>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Luther_Pierce

>> Studying the White Separatist National Alliance in your
>> spare time?

> I've read all of his books, and many others of that ilk,
> yes.

Your example undercuts your thesis, Jenn. There is widely held opinion that
William Pierce's books contain meaning.

Arny Krueger

May 26th 08, 12:19 PM

"MiNe 109" > wrote in message

> Lord! I guess Arny's not used to receiving apologies,

True. It is one of those areas where my practice is to give far more than I
receive.

Jenn[_2_]

May 28th 08, 10:36 PM

Arny Krueger

May 29th 08, 12:20 PM

"Jenn" > wrote in message

> In article
> >,
> ScottW > wrote:
>
>> On May 23, 11:20 am, George M. Middius
>> > wrote:
>>> Time for another bout of irrational yapping.
>>>
>>>>>>>>> What is my "dirty work" Arny?
>>>
>>>>>>>> Trying to be dominant.
>>>
>>>>>>> Bingo! Called it!
>>>
>>>>>> Very good call. For the life of me I can't see where
>>>>>> Mr. Kreuger gets that idea though. Maybe it stems
>>>>>> from the bad experiences he had in high
>>>>>> school with those mean teenage girls?
>>>
>>>>> Yep. There has to be a connection. Too bad we can't
>>>>> look at his mother's
>>>>> psychiatric record.
>>>
>>>> If he was truly sick, how sick are you for wanting to
>>>> look at this?
>>>
>>> Scottie, the lesson you should have drawn from your
>>> meltdown yesterday is that the impulses that flit
>>> through your dim little "mind" are not comprehensible
>>> thoughts. First, nobody else has any idea why you are
>>> inferring that the Krooborg "was" sick, when we all
>>> know it ***IS*** sick.
>>
>> And if you know this, it's sick of you to want to
>> examine
>> his family history.
>>
>> All the shallow eloquence in the world can't hide your
>> twisted sadistic perversions.
>> Well, maybe from Jenn it does.
>>
>> ScottW
>
> What does "aside from content" mean to you, Scott?

Intellectual shallowness. Form over function.

Harry Lavo

May 29th 08, 01:16 PM

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
. ..
> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
>> In article
>> >,
>> ScottW > wrote:
>>
>>> On May 23, 11:20 am, George M. Middius
>>> > wrote:
>>>> Time for another bout of irrational yapping.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What is my "dirty work" Arny?
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Trying to be dominant.
>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bingo! Called it!
>>>>
>>>>>>> Very good call. For the life of me I can't see where
>>>>>>> Mr. Kreuger gets that idea though. Maybe it stems
>>>>>>> from the bad experiences he had in high
>>>>>>> school with those mean teenage girls?
>>>>
>>>>>> Yep. There has to be a connection. Too bad we can't
>>>>>> look at his mother's
>>>>>> psychiatric record.
>>>>
>>>>> If he was truly sick, how sick are you for wanting to
>>>>> look at this?
>>>>
>>>> Scottie, the lesson you should have drawn from your
>>>> meltdown yesterday is that the impulses that flit
>>>> through your dim little "mind" are not comprehensible
>>>> thoughts. First, nobody else has any idea why you are
>>>> inferring that the Krooborg "was" sick, when we all
>>>> know it ***IS*** sick.
>>>
>>> And if you know this, it's sick of you to want to
>>> examine
>>> his family history.
>>>
>>> All the shallow eloquence in the world can't hide your
>>> twisted sadistic perversions.
>>> Well, maybe from Jenn it does.
>>>
>>> ScottW
>>
>> What does "aside from content" mean to you, Scott?
>
> Intellectual shallowness. Form over function.

therefore, Good Writing over Content.

You've just come full circle, Scott.

>
>

Jenn[_2_]

May 29th 08, 04:14 PM

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> > In article
> > >,
> > ScottW > wrote:
> >
> >> On May 23, 11:20 am, George M. Middius
> >> > wrote:
> >>> Time for another bout of irrational yapping.
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>> What is my "dirty work" Arny?
> >>>
> >>>>>>>> Trying to be dominant.
> >>>
> >>>>>>> Bingo! Called it!
> >>>
> >>>>>> Very good call. For the life of me I can't see where
> >>>>>> Mr. Kreuger gets that idea though. Maybe it stems
> >>>>>> from the bad experiences he had in high
> >>>>>> school with those mean teenage girls?
> >>>
> >>>>> Yep. There has to be a connection. Too bad we can't
> >>>>> look at his mother's
> >>>>> psychiatric record.
> >>>
> >>>> If he was truly sick, how sick are you for wanting to
> >>>> look at this?
> >>>
> >>> Scottie, the lesson you should have drawn from your
> >>> meltdown yesterday is that the impulses that flit
> >>> through your dim little "mind" are not comprehensible
> >>> thoughts. First, nobody else has any idea why you are
> >>> inferring that the Krooborg "was" sick, when we all
> >>> know it ***IS*** sick.
> >>
> >> And if you know this, it's sick of you to want to
> >> examine
> >> his family history.
> >>
> >> All the shallow eloquence in the world can't hide your
> >> twisted sadistic perversions.
> >> Well, maybe from Jenn it does.
> >>
> >> ScottW
> >
> > What does "aside from content" mean to you, Scott?
>
> Intellectual shallowness. Form over function.

Now Arny, you're making things up again. I never indicated that I
consider form to be more important than function.

George M. Middius[_4_]

May 29th 08, 05:19 PM

Jenn said:

> > >>> Scottie, the lesson you should have drawn from your
> > >>> meltdown yesterday is that the impulses that flit
> > >>> through your dim little "mind" are not comprehensible
> > >>> thoughts. First, nobody else has any idea why you are
> > >>> inferring that the Krooborg "was" sick, when we all
> > >>> know it ***IS*** sick.

> > >> All the shallow eloquence in the world can't hide your
> > >> twisted sadistic perversions.
> > >> Well, maybe from Jenn it does.

> > > What does "aside from content" mean to you, Scott?

> > Intellectual shallowness. Form over function.

> Now Arny, you're making things up again. I never indicated that I
> consider form to be more important than function.

Jenn Jen, poor dear Jennn. Its like your a newbie at, the debating trade
Jnen. You can't fool Arnii Krooger. ;-) Where in, your vicious personal
attack did you-bother to say *NOT* form-over function Jenen? Please, Jennnn
learn to say what Arnii want's you to, say Jeen. You can claim you are not
a Midduis-dupe, Jennn but the truth speak's other-wise Jen.

Harry Lavo

May 29th 08, 05:37 PM

"ScottW" > wrote in message
...
On May 29, 5:16 am, "Harry Lavo" > wrote:
> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
>
> . ..
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> >> In article
> >> >,
> >> ScottW > wrote:
>
> >>> On May 23, 11:20 am, George M. Middius
> >>> > wrote:
> >>>> Time for another bout of irrational yapping.
>
> >>>>>>>>>> What is my "dirty work" Arny?
>
> >>>>>>>>> Trying to be dominant.
>
> >>>>>>>> Bingo! Called it!
>
> >>>>>>> Very good call. For the life of me I can't see where
> >>>>>>> Mr. Kreuger gets that idea though. Maybe it stems
> >>>>>>> from the bad experiences he had in high
> >>>>>>> school with those mean teenage girls?
>
> >>>>>> Yep. There has to be a connection. Too bad we can't
> >>>>>> look at his mother's
> >>>>>> psychiatric record.
>
> >>>>> If he was truly sick, how sick are you for wanting to
> >>>>> look at this?
>
> >>>> Scottie, the lesson you should have drawn from your
> >>>> meltdown yesterday is that the impulses that flit
> >>>> through your dim little "mind" are not comprehensible
> >>>> thoughts. First, nobody else has any idea why you are
> >>>> inferring that the Krooborg "was" sick, when we all
> >>>> know it ***IS*** sick.
>
> >>> And if you know this, it's sick of you to want to
> >>> examine
> >>> his family history.
>
> >>> All the shallow eloquence in the world can't hide your
> >>> twisted sadistic perversions.
> >>> Well, maybe from Jenn it does.
>
> >>> ScottW
>
> >> What does "aside from content" mean to you, Scott?
>
> > Intellectual shallowness. Form over function.
>
> therefore, Good Writing over Content.
>
> You've just come full circle, Scott.

Who are you talking to?
Try not to be so confused when addressing me. It's disturbing.

ScottW

Sorry Scott....my bad.