Tc electronic M3000 ore reverb 4000 ?

[danny g]

Which is the best , price not included ? The TC electronic : M3000 ore the
Reverb 4000 , also a TC electronic (it is the stereo version of the reverb
6000) ?

Best regards , Danny Gevaers .

[Scott Dorsey]

danny g > wrote:
>Which is the best , price not included ? The TC electronic : M3000 ore the
>Reverb 4000 , also a TC electronic (it is the stereo version of the reverb
>6000) ?

For what application?
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

[Tim Padrick]

"Scott Dorsey" > wrote in message
...
> danny g > wrote:
>>Which is the best , price not included ? The TC electronic : M3000 ore the
>>Reverb 4000 , also a TC electronic (it is the stereo version of the reverb
>>6000) ?
>
> For what application?
> --scott
> --
> "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

The many comments I have read would suggest that in each case the
performance is commensurrate with the price. However the price differential
is so large that comparison is hardly worthwhile.

[Scott Dorsey]

In article >,
Tim Padrick > wrote:
>
>"Scott Dorsey" > wrote in message
...
>> danny g > wrote:
>>>Which is the best , price not included ? The TC electronic : M3000 ore the
>>>Reverb 4000 , also a TC electronic (it is the stereo version of the reverb
>>>6000) ?
>>
>> For what application?
>
>The many comments I have read would suggest that in each case the
>performance is commensurrate with the price. However the price differential
>is so large that comparison is hardly worthwhile.

Again, for what application? For a lot of things, you won't notice a
bit of difference, especially through typical PA speakers if you're only
using a little touch-up reverb. If you're trying to match room sounds to
dub a soloist into an existing live recording, oh, man, you will notice
the difference. Fixing reverb tails on chopped-off classical recordings?
It'll be very obvious there too. Depends on the job.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."