Re: **** on Kyoto

[Eeyore]

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:

> Eeyore wrote:
> > "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:
> >
> > > What I question is why power companies have representation on EVERY
> > > SINGLE site that claims to have "proof" discrediting AGW. You don't
> > > think that's at all odd. I do. In fact I think that's very odd. So be
> > > it.
> >
> > How about you provide some evidence of your absurd claim. Which power companies are represented ?
> > Who are their representatives. Let's have names instead of unsupported assertions.
>
> Dear Person Whose Ability to Think I Now Find Myself Questioning,
>
> How about ON THE SITE YOU PROVIDED? i already provided that name.

So write it here. I'm not playing guessing games with you.



Graham

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Dec 14, 2:57 pm, Eeyore >
wrote:
> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:
>
> > Eeyore wrote:
> > > "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:
>
> > > > What I question is why power companies have representation on EVERY
> > > > SINGLE site that claims to have "proof" discrediting AGW. You don't
> > > > think that's at all odd. I do. In fact I think that's very odd. So be
> > > > it.
>
> > > How about you provide some evidence of your absurd claim. Which power companies are represented ?
> > > Who are their representatives. Let's have names instead of unsupported assertions.
>
> > Dear Person Whose Ability to Think I Now Find Myself Questioning,
>
> > How about ON THE SITE YOU PROVIDED? i already provided that name.
>
> So write it here. I'm not playing guessing games with you.

Dear Person Whose Ability to Think Has Now Moved From "Questionable"
to "Clearly Very Limited",

************************************************** **************
43. Eeyore View profile
More options Dec 14, 12:07 am

Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion
From: Eeyore >
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 06:07:09 +0000
Local: Fri, Dec 14 2007 12:07 am
Subject: Re: **** on Kyoto

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:
> Eeyore wrote:

> > The inaugural founders of the coalition were:

> > Dr Vincent Gray, of Wellington, an expert reviewer for the Intergovernmental
> > Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), most recently a visiting scholar at the Beijing
> > Climate Centre in China.................. "

> > See, they even have an IPCC man.

> Why is it the EVERY single one of these groups also has a "consultant
> to energy companies" on board? EVERY single one? EVERY SINGLE ONE?
> Isn't that odd? I mean, what are the odds of that?

> "Brian Leyland, MSc , FIEE, FIMechE, FIPENZ, an Electrical and
> Mechanical Engineer specialising in power generation and power
> systems, now a power industry consultant."

Why the hell shouldn't they have an energy expert on their panel ? It
seems perfectly
natural to me.

Do you automatically assume they must be tainted in some way ? If so,
then you need
to look very seriously at your prejudices.
************************************************** *****************

Your "Powers of Retention" are now suspect too.

Oh. Brian Leyland. I'd hate to be called "TWIT" again, or accused of
trying to play guessing games. It made me very sad on the inside and
****.