Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
December 14th 07, 07:47 PM
On Dec 14, 11:43 am, Eeyore >
wrote:
> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Eeyore wrote:
> > > "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:
> > > > Eeyore wrote:
> > > > > Jenn wrote:
> > > > > > Eeyore wrote:
> > > > > > > "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > So you deny that many denied GW even existed,
>
> > > > > > > Who denied that ? I think you'll find that'a a myth put about by the
> > > > > > > rent-a-mob AGWists.
>
> > > > > > Actually, I recall just about the entire right-wing nutcase radio crowd
> > > > > > claiming this prior to about 6 months ago.
>
> > > > > I don't pay any attention to them. They are as you say, nutcases.
>
> > > > And as for the websites showing AGW to be bunk from "proper"
> > > > scientists?
>
> > > > Or are you having trouble digging them out?
>
> > > As I posted previously, I just lost my bookmarks. Have patience.
>
> > Are they as funny as this NZ one? I've been chuckling since I started
> > reading it.
>
> > Have you noticed how all these "new" sources depend on the same "old"
> > data from Lindzen, Sally what's-her-face (balalaika? You know, the one
> > who utterly misread the conclusions of a paper, based another paper on
> > it, and then would not admit her error...) and those wonderful
> > Robinsons and Soons who are generally laughed at.
>
> They don't.
>
> STOP LYING ! Just making stuff up is ****ing childish.
You haven't read your own citation then. Look at the "supporting"
links on the NZ site. Direct links to ICECAP (Balalaika, et al.) Fred
Singer. CO2 science, which was exposed in a British paper as being
funded by Exxon. 2pid brought that one up and a Brit right here on RAO
exposed that link. And on and on. They even trumpeted the pope's
recent proclamation. Now that's science at it's best! Right on the NZ
homepage! And they trumpeted an open letter to the Secretary-General
of the UN, signed by (surprise!) Lindzen, Spencer and Singer.
If you won't even read the sites you refer to and their "recommended
links", how am I to take you seriously? More importantly, why should
I?
Lying indeed. Insults are what those opposed to AGW apparently must
depend on to "shout down" their opponents. LOL!
wrote:
> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Eeyore wrote:
> > > "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:
> > > > Eeyore wrote:
> > > > > Jenn wrote:
> > > > > > Eeyore wrote:
> > > > > > > "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > So you deny that many denied GW even existed,
>
> > > > > > > Who denied that ? I think you'll find that'a a myth put about by the
> > > > > > > rent-a-mob AGWists.
>
> > > > > > Actually, I recall just about the entire right-wing nutcase radio crowd
> > > > > > claiming this prior to about 6 months ago.
>
> > > > > I don't pay any attention to them. They are as you say, nutcases.
>
> > > > And as for the websites showing AGW to be bunk from "proper"
> > > > scientists?
>
> > > > Or are you having trouble digging them out?
>
> > > As I posted previously, I just lost my bookmarks. Have patience.
>
> > Are they as funny as this NZ one? I've been chuckling since I started
> > reading it.
>
> > Have you noticed how all these "new" sources depend on the same "old"
> > data from Lindzen, Sally what's-her-face (balalaika? You know, the one
> > who utterly misread the conclusions of a paper, based another paper on
> > it, and then would not admit her error...) and those wonderful
> > Robinsons and Soons who are generally laughed at.
>
> They don't.
>
> STOP LYING ! Just making stuff up is ****ing childish.
You haven't read your own citation then. Look at the "supporting"
links on the NZ site. Direct links to ICECAP (Balalaika, et al.) Fred
Singer. CO2 science, which was exposed in a British paper as being
funded by Exxon. 2pid brought that one up and a Brit right here on RAO
exposed that link. And on and on. They even trumpeted the pope's
recent proclamation. Now that's science at it's best! Right on the NZ
homepage! And they trumpeted an open letter to the Secretary-General
of the UN, signed by (surprise!) Lindzen, Spencer and Singer.
If you won't even read the sites you refer to and their "recommended
links", how am I to take you seriously? More importantly, why should
I?
Lying indeed. Insults are what those opposed to AGW apparently must
depend on to "shout down" their opponents. LOL!