Anyone knows a spray to stop this buzz-buzzer?

[[email protected]]

Rahe's own aspiring Nazi B. Ludwig tirelessly floods this once audio
forum with OTs copied wholesale from the semi-inteligentsia of the
brown variety. Nobody replies because nobody can read those pompous
effusions from the Neo-Nazi grouplet circuit without falling asleep
after the first paragraph. .
The readership of this forum express their opinion by ignoring him.
Sadly, there is no way of stopping this polluter He already succeeded
in making a once lively audio forum into the biggest bore in the long-
suffering internet web.

Ludovic Mirabel

[Jez Slink]

> wrote in message
...
> Rahe's own aspiring Nazi B. Ludwig tirelessly floods this once audio
> forum with OTs copied wholesale from the semi-inteligentsia of the
> brown variety. Nobody replies because nobody can read those pompous
> effusions from the Neo-Nazi grouplet circuit without falling asleep
> after the first paragraph. .
> The readership of this forum express their opinion by ignoring him.
> Sadly, there is no way of stopping this polluter He already succeeded
> in making a once lively audio forum into the biggest bore in the long-
> suffering internet web.
>
> Ludovic Mirabel

He is being monitored.

[George M. Middius]

Jez Slink said:

[Bratzi]

> He is being monitored.

Cool! Did you tag him with a transponder too? It'll help you track him
back to his lair and maybe trap some other Nazis from his herd.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Nov 21, 2:13 pm, "ScottW" > wrote:
> > wrote in message

> > Sadly, there is no way of stopping this polluter.
>
> See Jenn, she's the filter expert. Since it so troubling to you,
> he can be made invisible.
> Then you can read Geore, a veritable fountain of audio
> knowledge.

No, Geore is a veritible fountain of knowledge on pollution.

He won a Nobel recently, you know.

[George M. Middius]

Shhhh! said:

> > Then you can read Geore, a veritable fountain of audio
> > knowledge.

> No, Geore is a veritible fountain of knowledge on pollution.

Are you trying to trick Scottie with a spelling shell game?

> He won a Nobel recently, you know.

He also got tapped to consult for a big venture capital company. Scottie
should tell them their company is worthless because nobody is going to
buy solutions to a non-problem.

[Clyde Slick]

On 21 Noi, 19:06, MiNe 109 > wrote:
> In article >,
>
>
>
> "ScottW" > wrote:
> > "George M. Middius" <cmndr _ george @ comcast . net> wrote in message
> ...
>
> > > Shhhh! said:
>
> > >> > Then you can read Geore, a veritable fountain of audio
> > >> > knowledge.
>
> > >> No, Geore is a veritible fountain of knowledge on pollution.
>
> > > Are you trying to trick Scottie with a spelling shell game?
>
> > >> He won a Nobel recently, you know.
>
> > > He also got tapped to consult for a big venture capital company. Scottie
> > > should tell them their company is worthless because nobody is going to
> > > buy solutions to a non-problem.
>
> > Carbon credits are a sham.
>
> They're also the conservative market-based alternative to government
> regulation. Take your pick.
>
except the purchaser is really not paying for anything, other than
a guilt free conscience.
talk about snake oil!!!
its like many charitable donations, where only 5 to 20%
get to those who have the problems.
and of course, it favors the rich, and is against the poor,
such a great adherence to liberal tradition!!
guilt free carbon splurging for
those fortunate to afford it.
of course, the government could always enclose a carbon
credit or two in each welfare check envelope.

[George M. Middius]

MiNe 109 said:

> > > [Former VP and Nobel laureate Al Gore Jr.] also got tapped to consult for a big venture
> > > capital company. Scottieshould tell them their company is worthless because nobody is
> > > going to buy solutions to a non-problem.

> > Carbon credits are a sham[sic].

I think you meant "scam", Scooter. Don't worry, though -- your
semiliteracy is an open secret.

> They're also the conservative market-based alternative to government
> regulation. Take your pick.

The only reason Witless deplores carbon credits is because he's too
stupid and/or lazy to retrofit his tract house to reap the benefits.

[George M. Middius]

Clyde Slick said:

> > They're also the conservative market-based alternative to government
> > regulation. Take your pick.

> except the purchaser is really not paying for anything, other than
> a guilt free conscience.

You're starting to dumb yourself down again, Sacky.

> talk about snake oil!!!

Let's not and say we did.

> its[sic] like many charitable donations, where only 5 to 20%

Did you like duh-Scottie's excuse for not learning his native language?

> and of course, it favors the rich, and is against the poor,
> such a great adherence to liberal tradition!!
> guilt free carbon splurging for
> those fortunate to afford it.
> of course, the government could always enclose a carbon
> credit or two in each welfare check envelope.

Good thinking. I can see why you're dead-set against the huge expansions
of government accomplished by Reagan and Dumbya.

[[email protected]]

On Nov 21, 5:26 pm, George M. Middius <cmndr _ george @ comcast .
net> wrote:
> MiNe 109 said:
>
> > > > [Former VP and Nobel laureate Al Gore Jr.] also got tapped to consult for a big venture
> > > > capital company. Scottieshould tell them their company is worthless because nobody is
> > > > going to buy solutions to a non-problem.
> > > Carbon credits are a sham[sic].
>
> I think you meant "scam", Scooter. Don't worry, though -- your
> semiliteracy is an open secret.
>
> > They're also the conservative market-based alternative to government
> > regulation. Take your pick.
>
> The only reason Witless deplores carbon credits is because he's too
> stupid and/or lazy to retrofit his tract house to reap the benefits.

Note that I never mentioned him. But when I was talking about the OT
bores I had him in miind as well,. But one at atime.. Obviously, I
touched a nerve. Wear the cap ScottW.
Ludovic Mirabel

[Clyde Slick]

On 21 Noi, 20:37, George M. Middius <cmndr _ george @ comcast . net>
wrote:
> Clyde Slick said:
>
> > > They're also the conservative market-based alternative to government
> > > regulation. Take your pick.
> > except the purchaser is really not paying for anything, other than
> > a guilt free conscience.
>
> You're starting to dumb yourself down again, Sacky.
>
> > talk about snake oil!!!
>
> Let's not and say we did.
>
> > its[sic] like many charitable donations, where only 5 to 20%
>
> Did you like duh-Scottie's excuse for not learning his native language?
>
> > and of course, it favors the rich, and is against the poor,
> > such a great adherence to liberal tradition!!
> > guilt free carbon splurging for
> > those fortunate to afford it.
> > of course, the government could always enclose a carbon
> > credit or two in each welfare check envelope.
>
> Good thinking. I can see why you're dead-set against the huge expansions
> of government accomplished by Reagan and Dumbya.

it doesn't matter who is in, it just keeps getting bigger, just a
matter of what
sectors tax money is wasted in. Personally, i profited
from wasting it in highway and road development, not a particularly
political item,
so it marches on, no matter what.

[Clyde Slick]

On 22 Noi, 00:52, MiNe 109 > wrote:
> In article >,
> George M. Middius <cmndr _ george @ comcast . net> wrote:
>
> > Clyde Slick said:
>
> > > > They're also the conservative market-based alternative to government
> > > > regulation. Take your pick.
>
> > > except the purchaser is really not paying for anything, other than
> > > a guilt free conscience.
>
> > You're starting to dumb yourself down again, Sacky.
>
> What is it about conservatives and abstract reasoning? Anything not a
> number is an "opinion" for Scott and here the basics of cap and trade
> are not "anything".
>

and just what do you get for your purchase?
i have nothing against carbon credits.
they do EXACTLY what they are designed to do,
to make wealthy carbon wasting liberals feel good
about themselves.
they are no worse than attending a self
fulfillment seminar of one sort or another.
yeah, i have no problem with
people buying very little for a whole
lot of money. its all part of capitalism.

>
>
> > > talk about snake oil!!!
>
> > Let's not and say we did.
>
> > > its[sic] like many charitable donations, where only 5 to 20%
>
> > Did you like duh-Scottie's excuse for not learning his native language?
>
> > > and of course, it favors the rich, and is against the poor,
> > > such a great adherence to liberal tradition!!
> > > guilt free carbon splurging for
> > > those fortunate to afford it.
> > > of course, the government could always enclose a carbon
> > > credit or two in each welfare check envelope.
>
> > Good thinking. I can see why you're dead-set against the huge expansions
> > of government accomplished by Reagan and Dumbya.
>
> How about "Freedom Futures" in which we can sell our right not to be
> spied on by our phone companies?
>

you can best reduce your carbon foot print by permanently
puttng yourself to rest in the ground.
a benefit of replacing your own caqrbon depletions, and preventing
new ones upon your behalf. that is the best carbon credit of all.

[Clyde Slick]

On 22 Noi, 00:52, MiNe 109 > wrote:
\
>
> How about "Freedom Futures" in which we can sell our right not to be
> spied on by our phone companies?
>

we already have that at your local supermarket.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Nov 22, 12:16 am, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> On 22 Noi, 00:52, MiNe 109 > wrote:

> > What is it about conservatives and abstract reasoning? Anything not a
> > number is an "opinion" for Scott and here the basics of cap and trade
> > are not "anything".
>
> and just what do you get for your purchase?
> i have nothing against carbon credits.
> they do EXACTLY what they are designed to do,
> to make wealthy carbon wasting liberals feel good
> about themselves.

Hm. On the one hand, 2pid recently argued that capitalist market
forces would help keep the Amazon Basin from being deforested in an
irresponsible way.

OTOH, now that captalist market incentives are created to reward
reducing emissions by allowing those who are more efficient to offset
those that are not, it's a liberal trick to assuage a guilty
conscience.

So which conservative view is the correct one? I guess that just
depends on which way the CO2-filled wind is blowing.

> > How about "Freedom Futures" in which we can sell our right not to be
> > spied on by our phone companies?
>
> you can best reduce your carbon foot print by permanently
> puttng yourself to rest in the ground.

Then please kill yourself immediately, Clyde. We need all the help in
this department we can get.

> a benefit of replacing your own caqrbon depletions, and preventing
> new ones upon your behalf. that is the best carbon credit of all.

And please take 2pid and nob with you. We can't afford to waste air
any more.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Nov 21, 11:52 pm, MiNe 109 > wrote:

> What is it about conservatives and abstract reasoning? Anything not a
> number is an "opinion" for Scott and here the basics of cap and trade
> are not "anything".

I think mindless blind devotion is a prerequisite for being a
conservative. If they could think, they would be liberal.

[Clyde Slick]

On 22 Noi, 07:05, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Nov 22, 12:16 am, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > On 22 Noi, 00:52, MiNe 109 > wrote:
> > > What is it about conservatives and abstract reasoning? Anything not a
> > > number is an "opinion" for Scott and here the basics of cap and trade
> > > are not "anything".
>
> > and just what do you get for your purchase?
> > i have nothing against carbon credits.
> > they do EXACTLY what they are designed to do,
> > to make wealthy carbon wasting liberals feel good
> > about themselves.
>
> Hm. On the one hand, 2pid recently argued that capitalist market
> forces would help keep the Amazon Basin from being deforested in an
> irresponsible way.
>
> OTOH, now that captalist market incentives are created to reward
> reducing emissions by allowing those who are more efficient to offset
> those that are not, it's a liberal trick to assuage a guilty
> conscience.
>
> So which conservative view is the correct one? I guess that just
> depends on which way the CO2-filled wind is blowing.

i didn't make the first argument, nor do i necessarily
subscribe to it. Your second argument is a mischaracterization

The market force is guilt reduction, not effective environmental
action

the two assertions have nothing to do with each other.

[Arny Krueger]

> wrote in message

> Rahe's own aspiring Nazi B. Ludwig tirelessly floods this
> once audio forum with OTs copied wholesale from the
> semi-inteligentsia of the brown variety. Nobody replies
> because nobody can read those pompous effusions from
> the Neo-Nazi grouplet circuit without falling asleep
> after the first paragraph. .

> The readership of this forum express their opinion by
> ignoring him. Sadly, there is no way of stopping this
> polluter He already succeeded in making a once lively
> audio forum into the biggest bore in the long- suffering
> internet web.

Given the polluting regulars that trash the place day after day...

[George M. Middius]

MiNe 109 said:

> > Good thinking. I can see why you're dead-set against the huge expansions
> > of government accomplished by Reagan and Dumbya.

> How about "Freedom Futures" in which we can sell our right not to be
> spied on by our phone companies?

I'd give thanks for that!

Wait... What do you mean "phone companies"? Is this part of Patriot Act
Part IV?

[MINe109]

On Nov 22, 11:07 am, George M. Middius <cmndr _ george @ comcast .
net> wrote:
> MiNe 109 said:
>
> > > Good thinking. I can see why you're dead-set against the huge expansions
> > > of government accomplished by Reagan and Dumbya.
> > How about "Freedom Futures" in which we can sell our right not to be
> > spied on by our phone companies?
>
> I'd give thanks for that!
>
> Wait... What do you mean "phone companies"? Is this part of Patriot Act
> Part IV?

That and the secret ATT rooms the internet goes through.

It's google groups time as my regular provider has taken the day off.

Stephen

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Nov 22, 7:08 pm, MINe109 > wrote:
> On Nov 22, 11:07 am, George M. Middius <cmndr _ george @ comcast .
>
> net> wrote:
> > MiNe 109 said:
>
> > > > Good thinking. I can see why you're dead-set against the huge expansions
> > > > of government accomplished by Reagan and Dumbya.
> > > How about "Freedom Futures" in which we can sell our right not to be
> > > spied on by our phone companies?
>
> > I'd give thanks for that!
>
> > Wait... What do you mean "phone companies"? Is this part of Patriot Act
> > Part IV?
>
> That and the secret ATT rooms the internet goes through.
>
> It's google groups time as my regular provider has taken the day off.

Is this really you?

I recently learned of a secret plan of George's to impersonate you
this week.

[MINe109]

On Nov 23, 1:56 am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Nov 22, 7:08 pm, MINe109 > wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Nov 22, 11:07 am, George M. Middius <cmndr _ george @ comcast .
>
> > net> wrote:
> > > MiNe 109 said:
>
> > > > > Good thinking. I can see why you're dead-set against the huge expansions
> > > > > of government accomplished by Reagan and Dumbya.
> > > > How about "Freedom Futures" in which we can sell our right not to be
> > > > spied on by our phone companies?
>
> > > I'd give thanks for that!
>
> > > Wait... What do you mean "phone companies"? Is this part of Patriot Act
> > > Part IV?
>
> > That and the secret ATT rooms the internet goes through.
>
> > It's google groups time as my regular provider has taken the day off.
>
> Is this really you?
>
> I recently learned of a secret plan of George's to impersonate you
> this week.

If my Usenet provider had gone wonky after I entered a discussion on
the Patriot Act and domestic spying I'd be more paranoid.

BTW, Googlegroups is cumbersome and the bracket thingie didn't make
any difference for cumbersome URLs.

Stephen

[George M. Middius]

MINe109 said:

> BTW, Googlegroups is cumbersome and the bracket thingie didn't make
> any difference for cumbersome URLs.

This is why the world is still waiting for Kroo-Mongrel Software Ink. to
step in and make everything all better.

[Clyde Slick]

On 23 Noi, 10:41, George M. Middius <cmndr _ george @ comcast . net>
wrote:
> MINe109 said:
>
> > BTW, Googlegroups is cumbersome and the bracket thingie didn't make
> > any difference for cumbersome URLs.
>
> This is why the world is still waiting for Kroo-Mongrel Software Ink. to
> step in and make everything all better.

he's been there, done that, of course.

[George M. Middius]

Clyde Slick said:

> > > BTW, Googlegroups is cumbersome and the bracket thingie didn't make
> > > any difference for cumbersome URLs.

> > This is why the world is still waiting for Kroo-Mongrel Software Ink. to
> > step in and make everything all better.

> he's been there, done that, of course.

You should say "they", not "he".