Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking Advice: Simple High-Quality Digital Recorder
Hello all. I hope this is an appropriate question for this newsgroup.
I am a member of a small group that mainly does medieval and renaissance music. I need to record the group for rehearsal feedback purposes, and the occasional use on local radio etc. My old Tascam analogue recording deck has died and I have been able to borrow a friend's HDD digital deck a couple of times but need to acquire one of my own. It will only be used for recording from microphones. I've spent some time looking around on eBay and there seem to be quite a few devices available, most of which with features I do not need. What I need is: 4 mic inputs stereo PCM output 44.1 kHz or better sampling stereo RCA and headphone output some means of digital output that will enable me to transfer files to a modern PC: USB, Firewire, SD or even CD-R I guess that RCA stereo line input would be acceptable as I have a 4-2 mic mixer lying about somewhere. What I don't need is on-device editing, lots of fancy digital effects, track bouncing, a drum machine etc etc. Grateful for any recommendations. Stewart |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking Advice: Simple High-Quality Digital Recorder
Hello Steve,
I was facing a very similar list of requirements a few months ago and I have decided to get the Edirol R-4. It has 4 mic inputs and records to 40 GB internal hard-disk (up to 24 bit / 96 khz). Transfer can then be made to Compact-Flash card or via USB 2.0 to any connected computer (the internal hard-drive will just show up as a new storage device of the computer - very simple). Some (few) effects are built in but strictly for enhancing the recording - no fancy features like drum machines, track bouncing etc. Operation is very easy and the device is even portable (takes 8 AA batteries or rechargeables for 2-3 hours of operating time). The quality of the mic-preamps is good (though not outstanding). Martin "Stewart" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... Hello all. I hope this is an appropriate question for this newsgroup. I am a member of a small group that mainly does medieval and renaissance music. I need to record the group for rehearsal feedback purposes, and the occasional use on local radio etc. My old Tascam analogue recording deck has died and I have been able to borrow a friend's HDD digital deck a couple of times but need to acquire one of my own. It will only be used for recording from microphones. I've spent some time looking around on eBay and there seem to be quite a few devices available, most of which with features I do not need. What I need is: 4 mic inputs stereo PCM output 44.1 kHz or better sampling stereo RCA and headphone output some means of digital output that will enable me to transfer files to a modern PC: USB, Firewire, SD or even CD-R I guess that RCA stereo line input would be acceptable as I have a 4-2 mic mixer lying about somewhere. What I don't need is on-device editing, lots of fancy digital effects, track bouncing, a drum machine etc etc. Grateful for any recommendations. Stewart |
#3
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking Advice: Simple High-Quality Digital Recorder
On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 13:31:43 +1000, Stewart wrote:
I am a member of a small group that mainly does medieval and renaissance music. I need to record the group for rehearsal feedback purposes, and the occasional use on local radio etc. My old Tascam analogue recording deck has died and I have been able to borrow a friend's HDD digital deck a couple of times but need to acquire one of my own. It will only be used for recording from microphones. I've spent some time looking around on eBay and there seem to be quite a few devices available, most of which with features I do not need. What I need is: 4 mic inputs stereo PCM output 44.1 kHz or better sampling stereo RCA and headphone output some means of digital output that will enable me to transfer files to a modern PC: USB, Firewire, SD or even CD-R I guess that RCA stereo line input would be acceptable as I have a 4-2 mic mixer lying about somewhere. What I don't need is on-device editing, lots of fancy digital effects, track bouncing, a drum machine etc etc. Grateful for any recommendations. Your mixer will take care of the eadphone output, I expect. The exact types of connectors are hardly important, adaptors can easily be made up. So it looks as if you just need a simple stereo digital recorder. I often use my iRiver H320 for this sort of job. Sometimes a portable MiniDisk machine (I know it's a compressed audio format, but in practice it sounds very good.) Or maybe you already own a laptop computer? The internal audio system is unlikely to be very good (though you should try the Line In before jumping to conclusions). But adding a USB or Firewire audio interface is easy and affordable. |
#4
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking Advice: Simple High-Quality Digital Recorder
"Martin Doppelbauer" wrote ...
Hello Steve, I was facing a very similar list of requirements a few months ago and I have decided to get the Edirol R-4. It has 4 mic inputs and records to 40 GB internal hard-disk (up to 24 bit / 96 khz). Transfer can then be made to Compact-Flash card or via USB 2.0 to any connected computer (the internal hard-drive will just show up as a new storage device of the computer - very simple). Some (few) effects are built in but strictly for enhancing the recording - no fancy features like drum machines, track bouncing etc. Operation is very easy and the device is even portable (takes 8 AA batteries or rechargeables for 2-3 hours of operating time). The quality of the mic-preamps is good (though not outstanding). Appears to be discontinued. At least here in the US. |
#5
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking Advice: Simple High-Quality Digital Recorder
On Apr 21, 11:31 pm, Stewart wrote:
I am a member of a small group that mainly does medieval and renaissance music. I need to record the group for rehearsal feedback purposes, and the occasional use on local radio etc. My old Tascam analogue recording deck has died and I have been able to borrow a friend's HDD digital deck There are several approaches to this. What (exactly) is your old analog unit, what (exactly) did you borrow from your friend, and how well did those suit your needs or not? 4 mic inputs stereo PCM output 44.1 kHz or better sampling stereo RCA and headphone output some means of digital output that will enable me to transfer files to a modern PC: USB, Firewire, SD or even CD-R What I don't need is on-device editing, lots of fancy digital effects, track bouncing, a drum machine etc etc. You have quite a mishmash of needs, but the truth is that you'll have to take what you can get, or put together a system from individual components to customize it to your needs. You say you need four mic inputs. Is this because there are four members of the group? Or do you have a successful way of recording the group in stereo using four mics and a mixer? Is the group well balanced so that they could be recorded direct to stereo with a pair of properly placed mics? I'm thinking that you probably shouldn't be looking on eBay because you don't really know what you need yet. You should be looking in a well stocked music store, at least to get some ideas as to feature sets, makes and models, and price ranges. They come in all shapes and sizes. The way I'd do what I think you're describing is to use one of the new flash memory card recorders. For example the Zoom H4 has a built-in pair of mics that reports range from blah to good (but you can plug in better mics if you have them, or even a mixer if you want to use four mics and mix them to stereo as you record), it costs less than $300, and will fit in a jacket pocket - no setup hassles other than to put it someplace where it can adequately "hear" the group. You can connect it to a computer via USB, do your "production" there, and burn your CDs. You might find one fo the current TASCAM 8-track digital workstations to be a good replacement for your old recorder if that's sort of what you had that used cassettes, but they have their limitations, too. |
#6
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking Advice: Simple High-Quality Digital Recorder
Stewart wrote:
I am a member of a small group I need to record the group I have been able to borrow a friend's HDD digital deck a couple of times but need to acquire one of my own. Grateful for any recommendations. Have a look at the Fostex FR-2LE http://www.fostex.com/index.php?file=products/pfr/fr2le I saw it at NAB last week, and when the Fostex folks at the booth mentioned it was selling for $600, I thought that was quite attractive. You can buy it from Musician's Friend for $500 and they'll throw in Sony MDR 7502 headphones with it. If your budget allows, park a MOTU Traveler next to it, and you've got a pretty nice setup for what you want to do. I use a Traveler with a Marantz PMD 670 (or whichever recorder I happen to be taking for the job) and am quite pleased. The Traveler is a little fiddly, but once you get the hang of it, no problem. And just a note: If you buy a CF recorder, be sure to use good quality, name brand CF cards. I cheaped out once and got a card from Two Hung Lo discount computer supply or somebody like that. LSS, spend the money, get the good stuff. Good luck. TM |
#7
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking Advice: Simple High-Quality Digital Recorder
Try
http://www.swee****er.com/store/detail/R4Edirol/ "Richard Crowley" wrote in message ... "Martin Doppelbauer" wrote ... Hello Steve, I was facing a very similar list of requirements a few months ago and I have decided to get the Edirol R-4. It has 4 mic inputs and records to 40 GB internal hard-disk (up to 24 bit / 96 khz). Transfer can then be made to Compact-Flash card or via USB 2.0 to any connected computer (the internal hard-drive will just show up as a new storage device of the computer - very simple). Some (few) effects are built in but strictly for enhancing the recording - no fancy features like drum machines, track bouncing etc. Operation is very easy and the device is even portable (takes 8 AA batteries or rechargeables for 2-3 hours of operating time). The quality of the mic-preamps is good (though not outstanding). Appears to be discontinued. At least here in the US. |
#8
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking Advice: Simple High-Quality Digital Recorder
On Apr 22, 12:17 pm, "Baabin" wrote:
I have decided to get the Edirol R-4. Appears to be discontinued. At least here in the US. They came up with the R4-Pro or something like that, which has SMPTE time code. It's possible that they dropped distribution of that model in the US because they couldn't sell it against the Fostex models that have time code. But it's true that it no longer appears (at least not obviously) on the Edirol.com website. Pity. I was always kind of interested in that model for myself, but I heard enough cranky things about it (don't ask - I don't remember) that my interest eventually cooled off. Now I'm waiting for the Korg MR-1000. |
#9
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking Advice: Simple High-Quality Digital Recorder
On Apr 22, 11:36 am, tmaki wrote:
Have a look at the Fostex FR-2LE I saw it at NAB last week, and when the Fostex folks at the booth mentioned it was selling for $600, I thought that was quite attractive. You can buy it from Musician's Friend for $500 and they'll throw in Sony MDR 7502 headphones with it. You can't buy it yet because they told me it wouldn't be shipping until May. But like just about everything in that category these days, it records to a compact flash card rather than a disk drive. I don't want that, though the original poster might be able to work with it. |
#10
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking Advice: Simple High-Quality Digital Recorder
"Baabin" wrote ...
"Richard Crowley" wrote ... "Martin Doppelbauer" wrote ... Hello Steve, I was facing a very similar list of requirements a few months ago and I have decided to get the Edirol R-4. It has 4 mic inputs and records to 40 GB internal hard-disk (up to 24 bit / 96 khz). Transfer can then be made to Compact-Flash card or via USB 2.0 to any connected computer (the internal hard-drive will just show up as a new storage device of the computer - very simple). Some (few) effects are built in but strictly for enhancing the recording - no fancy features like drum machines, track bouncing etc. Operation is very easy and the device is even portable (takes 8 AA batteries or rechargeables for 2-3 hours of operating time). The quality of the mic-preamps is good (though not outstanding). Appears to be discontinued. At least here in the US. Try http://www.swee****er.com/store/detail/R4Edirol/ Better order quick if you want one. Most other retailers list it as discontinued. Dunno whether I would consider buying a discontinued product. |
#11
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking Advice: Simple High-Quality Digital Recorder
Mike Rivers wrote:
On Apr 22, 11:36 am, tmaki wrote: Have a look at the Fostex FR-2LE I saw it at NAB last week, and when the Fostex folks at the booth mentioned it was selling for $600, I thought that was quite attractive. You can buy it from Musician's Friend for $500 and they'll throw in Sony MDR 7502 headphones with it. You can't buy it yet because they told me it wouldn't be shipping until May. Right, although they hinted to me that maybe next week, which is pretty much the same as May. But like just about everything in that category these days, it records to a compact flash card rather than a disk drive. I don't want that Well, everybody has their own reasons for their preferences, but I, too, had misgivings about CF. When I lost an important recording using a 2Gb CF (the Two Hung Lo brand), I contacted Doug Oade for his advice thinking perhaps there might be a firmware upgrade for the PMD 670 that might solve the problem. His advice was to use either Lexar or Sandisk CF. I bought Lexar on that advice, and haven't had a problem since. I have a microdrive as well, and strangely, it won't play back in the machine. I have to plug it into the card reader in the computer. I've decided to use it for computer data chores. The only HD failure I've ever experienced in a recorder was in one of my Fostex D1624s. It wasn't the machine's fault -- the drive just went TU, like they all do. So, ya never know. I'm still not betting everything on CF. Just Friday I did a 2to2 and used the laptop as backup. But the CF performed flawlessly. A professional photographer colleague just yesterday was telling how his life has changed using CF in his Canon cameras. Photo guys have as much at stake as recording guys, and they seem to be getting comfortable with CF. Several of the respected recorder brands are going to CF. I don't remember if it was Zaxcom or SD that was showing models with CF (we blasted through the whole show on Monday, and were probably among the last ones out of South Hall at 6:15 PM, so recollectible details are fuzzy), but it seems to becoming quite acceptable as a stable medium. Nevertheless, I've still got 145 10" reels of Ampex 456 and 457 on the shelf, so I can always go back to analog R/R. Take care. TM |
#12
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking Advice: Simple High-Quality Digital Recorder
On Apr 22, 9:32 am, Mike Rivers wrote:
On Apr 22, 12:17 pm, "Baabin" wrote: I have decided to get the Edirol R-4. Appears to be discontinued. At least here in the US. They came up with the R4-Pro or something like that, which has SMPTE time code. It's possible that they dropped distribution of that model in the US because they couldn't sell it against the Fostex models that have time code. But it's true that it no longer appears (at least not obviously) on the Edirol.com website. Pity. I was always kind of interested in that model for myself, but I heard enough cranky things about it (don't ask - I don't remember) that my interest eventually cooled off. Now I'm waiting for the Korg MR-1000. Both the EDIROL R-4 and the R-4 Pro are readily available in the US and neither are discontinued. The R-4 unit works very well for those that do use time code and as a result it is a few hundred dollars less than the R-4 Pro (which does have int/ext time code). Full R-4 info is up on the EDIROL web site at http://www.edirol.com/index.php?opti...6&Itemi d=385 R-4 Pro at http://www.edirol.com/index.php?opti...0&Itemi d=385 Hope that helps, John Broadhead Roland Systems Group |
#13
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking Advice: Simple High-Quality Digital Recorder
On Apr 22, 11:16 pm, wrote:
Both the EDIROL R-4 and the R-4 Pro are readily available in the US and neither are discontinued. Nice to have you lurking here, John. I missed the R-4 on the web site because I didn't look under Video (since it isn't video). You might want to suggest to your web designer that he put a link to the R-4 page along with the link to "Audio Capture" on the Interfaces section where the other recorders are listed. It's easy to miss otherwise if you know you're looking for a recorder. |
#14
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking Advice: Simple High-Quality Digital Recorder
Thanks to all who replied with advice. In the end I went with a Zoom H4.
I have access to a studio if I need anything fancier. Stewart wrote: Hello all. I hope this is an appropriate question for this newsgroup. I am a member of a small group that mainly does medieval and renaissance music. I need to record the group for rehearsal feedback purposes, and the occasional use on local radio etc. My old Tascam analogue recording deck has died and I have been able to borrow a friend's HDD digital deck a couple of times but need to acquire one of my own. It will only be used for recording from microphones. I've spent some time looking around on eBay and there seem to be quite a few devices available, most of which with features I do not need. What I need is: 4 mic inputs stereo PCM output 44.1 kHz or better sampling stereo RCA and headphone output some means of digital output that will enable me to transfer files to a modern PC: USB, Firewire, SD or even CD-R I guess that RCA stereo line input would be acceptable as I have a 4-2 mic mixer lying about somewhere. What I don't need is on-device editing, lots of fancy digital effects, track bouncing, a drum machine etc etc. Grateful for any recommendations. Stewart |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|