| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
9/11 and Moon Landing Hoax explained
Moon landing hoax and 9/11 explanation
9-11 1. WTC building 7: After Popular Mechanics says that somehow air jet fuel, which can't reach the melting point of steel, was responsible for the pools of molten steel found... how do they explain the molten steel found in the third building WTC 7? This building was never hit by an aircraft and suffered a small hit from debris. How do they explain the molten steel in this building? Molten steel can't be created by the temperatures of air craft fuel. 2. Designers of the WTC said the buildings could withstand multiple hits from aircraft. 3. Why the cover up of any sort of scientific investigation? If there is nothing to hide why cover up the evidence? 4. Explosions reported by eye witnesses are consistent with controlled demolitions. 5. Why did the buildings fall in free fall rather than topple over? In order to do so, you have to get under the building and cut its supports from underneath. The planes hit the tops of the buildings. 6. These are the first three steel frame buildings to ever collapse from fire, all on the same day, in symmetrical "freefall" fashion (as in professional demolitions). http://www.serendipity.li/wot/other_...ther_fires.htm 7. The owner of the buildings getting them insured and getting more than he insured them for. This after the buildings had been condemned. It seems like Silverstein wanted them destroyed so he wouldn’t have to spend the money renovating them and the government was all too happy to assist him and cover up the actual cause of the collapse as an excuse to claim a war on terrorism, erode our rights, and a pretext to control huge resources of oil in Iraq. Our government is nothing more than a mafia, with the Godfather(s) being the elite. These elite are the international banking cartels. 8. Try Zeitgeist for starters and much more info. http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/ ----------------------- Moon Landing 0. Ooops. http://video.google.com/videosearch?...&hl=en&emb= 0 1. Astronauts didn't seem proud on return. If they had actually gone you would think they would be enthusiastic upon returning but it was the opposite, they seemed ashamed of what they'd done. 2. Technology was at the point where we could just go into orbit around the Earth with a manned vessel. Yet somehow, we took a giant leap and landed a manned vessel on the moon. Then we also took off from the moon with ease and returned safely, passing through the Van Allen Radiation Belt a second time unscathed? 3. The Van Allen Radiation Belt around earth contains deadly radiation that would kill any astronauts in a vessel attempting to go through it on the way to the moon. We didn't have the technology nor do we have it now to safely pass through it with a manned vessel. "It is the belief of John Mauldin, a physicist who works for NASA, that in order to be protected from the radiation, shielding at least 2 metres thick would be required. Yet the walls of the Lunar Landers which took astronauts from the spaceship to the moon surfaces were according to NASA "about the thickness of heavy duty aluminium foil."" http://durham21.co.uk/archive.asp?ID=102 This is a NASA physicist telling you this. Do you see the irony in that? Besides, if they did make it past the belts, there is even more deadly radiation caused by the sun's flares on their way to the moon. Yet the astronauts suffered no ill effects from all this radiation in a vessel that had shielding compared to heavy duty tin foil, and space suits that provided little to no protection. Not to mention that in the sunny areas where the astronauts are show to be frolicking about happily the temperature would have been 250 F above 0. How many of you would last more than a minute in such extremes and at the same time run around without a care. During the night, the temperature would fall 250 F below 0. That space suit is supposed to protect you from all these hazards? Right... http://video.google.com/videosearch?...&hl=en &emb=0 4. Camera trickery prior to alleged moon landing. Why fake halfway to the moon when they can go all the way to the moon? http://video.google.com/videosearch?...8&sa=N&tab=wv# 5. No stars in the photos. Yeah I know about the camera exposure explanation; this is one of the only explanations debunkers give that has any substance. Even letting that slip, you're telling me you go all the way to the moon and take thousands of photos but not one of them has stars in them, not even partial exposure, not even a trace? Keep in mind there is no atmosphere to obscure the stars and the stars would be much more visible and brighter; like the view from a desert but even more intense and pure, not dim and easy to obscure as debunkers would have you believe. The view of the stars from the moon without an atmosphere to obscure the light would be incredible. Yet, these guys don't even take one photo of the stars? They don't even mention the stars. Are you kidding me? That would be one of the first things you would notice. They don't mention them so that they don't bring them to your attention. 6. Dark Side of the Moon Stanley Kubrick directed the holly wood moon landing hoax. http://video.google.com/videosearch?...8&sa=N&tab=wv# 7. Moon rocks. You can find such rocks on Earth in places like Antarctica. They are just asteroids or lunites that have dropped to Earth and have stayed in good condition because of the ideal stasis conditions that exist in the Antarctic. 8. The Russians who were ahead of the USA in space exploration and technology could bring back about 10 ounces of moon rock at most with unmanned vessels, yet the USA managed to bring back hundreds of pounds of moon rocks in manned vessels. How did this giant leap in technology happen over night? 9. Director of NASA takes a trip to Antarctica prior to alleged Moon landings; most likely to collect so called "moon rocks". These are just asteroids; Antarctica because of the ideal conditions to find untainted rocks that easier to spot against the white background. 10. Photos showing shadows cast in more than one direction, consistent with multiple spotlights rather than one sun. http://video.google.com/videosearch?...ke&hl=en&emb=0 11. Rocks with markings like on a movie set. 12. Flag waving. The way the flag waves in particular should be noted. A flag doesn't wave in this way when manhandled. Only wind moves a flag in such a way. http://video.google.com/videosearch?...ke&hl=en&emb=0 13. If you look at the moon rovers and the dirt they fling into the air, they are consistent with Earth gravity and not Moon gravity. The dirt flies up and falls down in an arc consistent with earth gravity. http://video.google.com/videosearch?...ke&hl=en&emb=0 14. When you double the speed of the footage, the astronauts appear to be running and skipping in earth gravity. http://video.google.com/videosearch?...ke&hl=en&emb=0 15. Astronaut descending into the shadow of the space vessel yet his body is lit up. http://video.google.com/videosearch?...ke&hl=en&emb=0 16. If it was real, there would be no errors or anything dubious to point out in the first place. You can't argue with Truth. 17. Backlit objects being clearly visible from the front. This indicates spotlights as used on movie sets. 18. Area 51, where the moon movie was made has an area covered with craters ideal for a fake moon landing. http://video.google.com/videosearch?...ke&hl=en&emb=0 19. No blast crater where the module landed. The module is perfectly clean as well where there should have been dust settling on the craft from landing. 20. The module crashed in tests on Earth and was very unstable and hard to control. Armstrong had to eject to save his life. Yet, it landed flawlessly on the Moon six times, leaving no blast crater each time. http://video.google.com/videosearch?...ke&hl=en&emb=0 21. The Russians were sent grain as payment to keep them from exposing the hoax. 22. Ooops! lol http://video.google.com/videosearch?...&hl=en&emb= 0 |
|
#2
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
9/11 and Moon Landing Hoax explained
On Sep 27, 5:38*pm, wrote:
Moon landing hoax and 9/11 explanation 9-11 1. *WTC building 7: After Popular Mechanics says that somehow air jet fuel, which can't reach the melting point of steel, was responsible for the pools of molten steel found... how do they explain the molten steel found in the third building WTC 7? This building was never hit by an aircraft and suffered a small hit from debris. How do they explain the molten steel in this building? *Molten steel can't be created by the temperatures of air craft fuel. 2. *Designers of the WTC said the buildings could withstand multiple hits from aircraft. 3. *Why the cover up of any sort of scientific investigation? *If there is nothing to hide why cover up the evidence? 4. *Explosions reported by eye witnesses are consistent with controlled demolitions. 5. *Why did the buildings fall in free fall rather than topple over? In order to do so, you have to get under the building and cut its supports from underneath. *The planes hit the tops of the buildings. 6. *These are the first three steel frame buildings to ever collapse from fire, all on the same day, in symmetrical "freefall" fashion (as in professional demolitions).http://www.serendipity.li/wot/other_...ther_fires.htm 7. *The owner of the buildings getting them insured and getting more than he insured them for. *This after the buildings had been condemned. *It seems like Silverstein wanted them destroyed so he wouldn’t have to spend the money renovating them and the government was all too happy to assist him and cover up the actual cause of the collapse as an excuse to claim a war on terrorism, erode our rights, and a pretext to control huge resources of oil in Iraq. *Our government is nothing more than a mafia, with the Godfather(s) being the elite. *These elite are the international banking cartels. 8. *Try Zeitgeist for starters and much more info. http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/ ----------------------- Moon Landing 0. *Ooops. http://video.google.com/videosearch?...0steps%20on%20.... 1. *Astronauts didn't seem proud on return. *If they had actually gone you would think they would be enthusiastic upon returning but it was the opposite, they seemed ashamed of what they'd done. 2. Technology was at the point where we could just go into orbit around the Earth with a manned vessel. *Yet somehow, we took a giant leap and landed a manned vessel on the moon. *Then we also took off from the moon with ease and returned safely, passing through the Van Allen Radiation Belt a second time unscathed? 3. *The Van Allen Radiation Belt around earth contains deadly radiation that would kill any astronauts in a vessel attempting to go through it on the way to the moon. *We didn't have the technology nor do we have it now to safely pass through it with a manned vessel. "It is the belief of John Mauldin, a physicist who works for NASA, that in order to be protected from the radiation, shielding at least 2 metres thick would be required. *Yet the walls of the Lunar Landers which took astronauts from the spaceship to the moon surfaces were according to NASA "about the thickness of heavy duty aluminium foil."" http://durham21.co.uk/archive.asp?ID=102 This is a NASA physicist telling you this. *Do you see the irony in that? Besides, if they did make it past the belts, there is even more deadly radiation caused by the sun's flares on their way to the moon. *Yet the astronauts suffered no ill effects from all this radiation in a vessel that had shielding compared to heavy duty tin foil, and space suits that provided little to no protection. Not to mention that in the sunny areas where the astronauts are show to be frolicking about happily the temperature would have been 250 F above 0. *How many of you would last more than a minute in such extremes and at the same time run around without a care. *During the night, the temperature would fall 250 F below 0. *That space suit is supposed to protect you from all these hazards? *Right... http://video.google.com/videosearch?...0steps%20on%20.... 4. *Camera trickery prior to alleged moon landing. * Why fake halfway to the moon when they can go all the way to the moon? http://video.google.com/videosearch?...ings%20faked&u.... 5. *No stars in the photos. *Yeah I know about the camera exposure explanation; this is one of the only explanations debunkers give that has any substance. *Even letting that slip, you're telling me you go all the way to the moon and take thousands of photos but not one of them has stars in them, not even partial exposure, not even a trace? Keep in mind there is no atmosphere to obscure the stars and the stars would be much more visible and brighter; like the view from a desert but even more intense and pure, not dim and easy to obscure as debunkers would have you believe. *The view of the stars from the moon without an atmosphere to obscure the light would be incredible. *Yet, these guys don't even take one photo of the stars? *They don't even mention the stars. *Are you kidding me? *That would be one of the first things you would notice. *They don't mention them so that they don't bring them to your attention. 6. Dark Side of the Moon *Stanley Kubrick directed the holly wood moon landing hoax.http://video.google.com/videosearch?...%20of%20the%20... 7. Moon rocks. *You can find such rocks on Earth in places like Antarctica. *They are just asteroids or lunites that have dropped to Earth and have stayed in good condition because of the ideal stasis conditions that exist in the Antarctic. 8. *The Russians who were ahead of the USA in space exploration and technology could bring back about 10 ounces of moon rock at most with unmanned vessels, yet the USA managed to bring back hundreds of pounds of moon rocks in manned vessels. *How did this giant leap in technology happen over night? 9. *Director of NASA takes a trip to Antarctica prior to alleged Moon landings; most likely to collect so called "moon rocks". *These are just asteroids; Antarctica because of the ideal conditions to find untainted rocks that easier to spot against the white background. 10. *Photos showing shadows cast in more than one direction, consistent with multiple spotlights rather than one sun.http://video.google.com/videosearch?...0steps%20on%20... 11. *Rocks with markings like on a movie set. 12. *Flag waving. *The way the flag waves in particular should be noted. *A flag doesn't wave in this way when manhandled. *Only wind moves a flag in such a way. http://video.google.com/videosearch?...0steps%20on%20.... 13. *If you look at the moon rovers and the dirt they fling into the air, they are consistent with Earth gravity and not Moon gravity. *The dirt flies up and falls down in an arc consistent with earth gravity.http://video.google.com/videosearch?...0steps%20on%20... 14. *When you double the speed of the footage, the astronauts appear to be running and skipping in earth gravity.http://video.google.com/videosearch?...0steps%20on%20... 15. *Astronaut descending into the shadow of the space vessel yet his body is lit up.http://video.google.com/videosearch?...0steps%20on%20... 16. *If it was real, there would be no errors or anything dubious to point out in the first place. *You can't argue with Truth. 17. Backlit objects being clearly visible from the front. *This indicates spotlights as used on movie sets. 18. *Area 51, where the moon movie was made has an area covered with craters ideal for a fake moon landing.http://video.google.com/videosearch?...0steps%20on%20... 19. No blast crater where the module landed. *The module is perfectly clean as well where there should have been dust settling on the craft from landing. 20. *The module crashed in tests on Earth and was very unstable and hard to control. *Armstrong had to eject to save his life. *Yet, it landed flawlessly on the Moon six times, leaving no blast crater each time.http://video.google.com/videosearch?...0steps%20on%20... 21. *The Russians were sent grain as payment to keep them from exposing the hoax. 22. Ooops! lol http://video.google.com/videosearch?...0steps%20on%20.... This should be the correct video for 0 and 22: http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...ng&vt=lf&hl=en |
|
#3
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
9/11 and Moon Landing Hoax explained
On Sep 27, 5:45*pm, wrote:
On Sep 27, 5:38*pm, wrote: Moon landing hoax and 9/11 explanation 9-11 1. *WTC building 7: After Popular Mechanics says that somehow air jet fuel, which can't reach the melting point of steel, was responsible for the pools of molten steel found... how do they explain the molten steel found in the third building WTC 7? This building was never hit by an aircraft and suffered a small hit from debris. How do they explain the molten steel in this building? *Molten steel can't be created by the temperatures of air craft fuel. 2. *Designers of the WTC said the buildings could withstand multiple hits from aircraft. 3. *Why the cover up of any sort of scientific investigation? *If there is nothing to hide why cover up the evidence? 4. *Explosions reported by eye witnesses are consistent with controlled demolitions. 5. *Why did the buildings fall in free fall rather than topple over? In order to do so, you have to get under the building and cut its supports from underneath. *The planes hit the tops of the buildings. 6. *These are the first three steel frame buildings to ever collapse from fire, all on the same day, in symmetrical "freefall" fashion (as in professional demolitions).http://www.serendipity.li/wot/other_...ther_fires.htm 7. *The owner of the buildings getting them insured and getting more than he insured them for. *This after the buildings had been condemned. *It seems like Silverstein wanted them destroyed so he wouldn’t have to spend the money renovating them and the government was all too happy to assist him and cover up the actual cause of the collapse as an excuse to claim a war on terrorism, erode our rights, and a pretext to control huge resources of oil in Iraq. *Our government is nothing more than a mafia, with the Godfather(s) being the elite. *These elite are the international banking cartels. 8. *Try Zeitgeist for starters and much more info. http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/ ----------------------- Moon Landing 0. *Ooops. http://video.google.com/videosearch?...0steps%20on%20... 1. *Astronauts didn't seem proud on return. *If they had actually gone you would think they would be enthusiastic upon returning but it was the opposite, they seemed ashamed of what they'd done. 2. Technology was at the point where we could just go into orbit around the Earth with a manned vessel. *Yet somehow, we took a giant leap and landed a manned vessel on the moon. *Then we also took off from the moon with ease and returned safely, passing through the Van Allen Radiation Belt a second time unscathed? 3. *The Van Allen Radiation Belt around earth contains deadly radiation that would kill any astronauts in a vessel attempting to go through it on the way to the moon. *We didn't have the technology nor do we have it now to safely pass through it with a manned vessel. "It is the belief of John Mauldin, a physicist who works for NASA, that in order to be protected from the radiation, shielding at least 2 metres thick would be required. *Yet the walls of the Lunar Landers which took astronauts from the spaceship to the moon surfaces were according to NASA "about the thickness of heavy duty aluminium foil."" http://durham21.co.uk/archive.asp?ID=102 This is a NASA physicist telling you this. *Do you see the irony in that? Besides, if they did make it past the belts, there is even more deadly radiation caused by the sun's flares on their way to the moon. *Yet the astronauts suffered no ill effects from all this radiation in a vessel that had shielding compared to heavy duty tin foil, and space suits that provided little to no protection. Not to mention that in the sunny areas where the astronauts are show to be frolicking about happily the temperature would have been 250 F above 0. *How many of you would last more than a minute in such extremes and at the same time run around without a care. *During the night, the temperature would fall 250 F below 0. *That space suit is supposed to protect you from all these hazards? *Right... http://video.google.com/videosearch?...0steps%20on%20... 4. *Camera trickery prior to alleged moon landing. * Why fake halfway to the moon when they can go all the way to the moon? http://video.google.com/videosearch?...ings%20faked&u... 5. *No stars in the photos. *Yeah I know about the camera exposure explanation; this is one of the only explanations debunkers give that has any substance. *Even letting that slip, you're telling me you go all the way to the moon and take thousands of photos but not one of them has stars in them, not even partial exposure, not even a trace? Keep in mind there is no atmosphere to obscure the stars and the stars would be much more visible and brighter; like the view from a desert but even more intense and pure, not dim and easy to obscure as debunkers would have you believe. *The view of the stars from the moon without an atmosphere to obscure the light would be incredible. *Yet, these guys don't even take one photo of the stars? *They don't even mention the stars. *Are you kidding me? *That would be one of the first things you would notice. *They don't mention them so that they don't bring them to your attention. 6. Dark Side of the Moon *Stanley Kubrick directed the holly wood moon landing hoax.http://video.google.com/videosearch?...%20of%20the%20... 7. Moon rocks. *You can find such rocks on Earth in places like Antarctica. *They are just asteroids or lunites that have dropped to Earth and have stayed in good condition because of the ideal stasis conditions that exist in the Antarctic. 8. *The Russians who were ahead of the USA in space exploration and technology could bring back about 10 ounces of moon rock at most with unmanned vessels, yet the USA managed to bring back hundreds of pounds of moon rocks in manned vessels. *How did this giant leap in technology happen over night? 9. *Director of NASA takes a trip to Antarctica prior to alleged Moon landings; most likely to collect so called "moon rocks". *These are just asteroids; Antarctica because of the ideal conditions to find untainted rocks that easier to spot against the white background. 10. *Photos showing shadows cast in more than one direction, consistent with multiple spotlights rather than one sun.http://video.google.com/videosearch?...0steps%20on%20... 11. *Rocks with markings like on a movie set. 12. *Flag waving. *The way the flag waves in particular should be noted. *A flag doesn't wave in this way when manhandled. *Only wind moves a flag in such a way. http://video.google.com/videosearch?...0steps%20on%20... 13. *If you look at the moon rovers and the dirt they fling into the air, they are consistent with Earth gravity and not Moon gravity. *The dirt flies up and falls down in an arc consistent with earth gravity.http://video.google.com/videosearch?...0steps%20on%20... 14. *When you double the speed of the footage, the astronauts appear to be running and skipping in earth gravity.http://video.google.com/videosearch?...0steps%20on%20... 15. *Astronaut descending into the shadow of the space vessel yet his body is lit up.http://video.google.com/videosearch?...0steps%20on%20... 16. *If it was real, there would be no errors or anything dubious to point out in the first place. *You can't argue with Truth. 17. Backlit objects being clearly visible from the front. *This indicates spotlights as used on movie sets. 18. *Area 51, where the moon movie was made has an area covered with craters ideal for a fake moon landing.http://video.google.com/videosearch?...0steps%20on%20... 19. No blast crater where the module landed. *The module is perfectly clean as well where there should have been dust settling on the craft from landing. 20. *The module crashed in tests on Earth and was very unstable and hard to control. *Armstrong had to eject to save his life. *Yet, it landed flawlessly on the Moon six times, leaving no blast crater each time.http://video.google.com/videosearch?...0steps%20on%20... 21. *The Russians were sent grain as payment to keep them from exposing the hoax. 22. Ooops! lol http://video.google.com/videosearch?...0steps%20on%20... This should be the correct video for 0 and 22: http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...5442&ei=3ajeSO.... Aaron Russo before he died revealed what Rockefeller divulged to him: http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...07&vt=lf&hl=en |
|
#4
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
9/11 and Moon Landing Hoax explained
On Sep 27, 11:24*pm, wrote:
On Sep 27, 5:45*pm, wrote: On Sep 27, 5:38*pm, wrote: Moon landing hoax and 9/11 explanation 9-11 1. *WTC building 7: After Popular Mechanics says that somehow air jet fuel, which can't reach the melting point of steel, was responsible for the pools of molten steel found... how do they explain the molten steel found in the third building WTC 7? This building was never hit by an aircraft and suffered a small hit from debris. How do they explain the molten steel in this building? *Molten steel can't be created by the temperatures of air craft fuel. 2. *Designers of the WTC said the buildings could withstand multiple hits from aircraft. 3. *Why the cover up of any sort of scientific investigation? *If there is nothing to hide why cover up the evidence? 4. *Explosions reported by eye witnesses are consistent with controlled demolitions. 5. *Why did the buildings fall in free fall rather than topple over? In order to do so, you have to get under the building and cut its supports from underneath. *The planes hit the tops of the buildings.. 6. *These are the first three steel frame buildings to ever collapse from fire, all on the same day, in symmetrical "freefall" fashion (as in professional demolitions).http://www.serendipity.li/wot/other_...ther_fires.htm 7. *The owner of the buildings getting them insured and getting more than he insured them for. *This after the buildings had been condemned. *It seems like Silverstein wanted them destroyed so he wouldn’t have to spend the money renovating them and the government was all too happy to assist him and cover up the actual cause of the collapse as an excuse to claim a war on terrorism, erode our rights, and a pretext to control huge resources of oil in Iraq. *Our government is nothing more than a mafia, with the Godfather(s) being the elite. *These elite are the international banking cartels. 8. *Try Zeitgeist for starters and much more info. http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/ ----------------------- Moon Landing 0. *Ooops. http://video.google.com/videosearch?...0steps%20on%20... 1. *Astronauts didn't seem proud on return. *If they had actually gone you would think they would be enthusiastic upon returning but it was the opposite, they seemed ashamed of what they'd done. 2. Technology was at the point where we could just go into orbit around the Earth with a manned vessel. *Yet somehow, we took a giant leap and landed a manned vessel on the moon. *Then we also took off from the moon with ease and returned safely, passing through the Van Allen Radiation Belt a second time unscathed? 3. *The Van Allen Radiation Belt around earth contains deadly radiation that would kill any astronauts in a vessel attempting to go through it on the way to the moon. *We didn't have the technology nor do we have it now to safely pass through it with a manned vessel. "It is the belief of John Mauldin, a physicist who works for NASA, that in order to be protected from the radiation, shielding at least 2 metres thick would be required. *Yet the walls of the Lunar Landers which took astronauts from the spaceship to the moon surfaces were according to NASA "about the thickness of heavy duty aluminium foil."" http://durham21.co.uk/archive.asp?ID=102 This is a NASA physicist telling you this. *Do you see the irony in that? Besides, if they did make it past the belts, there is even more deadly radiation caused by the sun's flares on their way to the moon. *Yet the astronauts suffered no ill effects from all this radiation in a vessel that had shielding compared to heavy duty tin foil, and space suits that provided little to no protection. Not to mention that in the sunny areas where the astronauts are show to be frolicking about happily the temperature would have been 250 F above 0. *How many of you would last more than a minute in such extremes and at the same time run around without a care. *During the night, the temperature would fall 250 F below 0. *That space suit is supposed to protect you from all these hazards? *Right... http://video.google.com/videosearch?...0steps%20on%20... 4. *Camera trickery prior to alleged moon landing. * Why fake halfway to the moon when they can go all the way to the moon? http://video.google.com/videosearch?...ings%20faked&u... 5. *No stars in the photos. *Yeah I know about the camera exposure explanation; this is one of the only explanations debunkers give that has any substance. *Even letting that slip, you're telling me you go all the way to the moon and take thousands of photos but not one of them has stars in them, not even partial exposure, not even a trace? Keep in mind there is no atmosphere to obscure the stars and the stars would be much more visible and brighter; like the view from a desert but even more intense and pure, not dim and easy to obscure as debunkers would have you believe. *The view of the stars from the moon without an atmosphere to obscure the light would be incredible. *Yet, these guys don't even take one photo of the stars? *They don't even mention the stars. *Are you kidding me? *That would be one of the first things you would notice. *They don't mention them so that they don't bring them to your attention. 6. Dark Side of the Moon *Stanley Kubrick directed the holly wood moon landing hoax.http://video.google.com/videosearch?...%20of%20the%20... 7. Moon rocks. *You can find such rocks on Earth in places like Antarctica. *They are just asteroids or lunites that have dropped to Earth and have stayed in good condition because of the ideal stasis conditions that exist in the Antarctic. 8. *The Russians who were ahead of the USA in space exploration and technology could bring back about 10 ounces of moon rock at most with unmanned vessels, yet the USA managed to bring back hundreds of pounds of moon rocks in manned vessels. *How did this giant leap in technology happen over night? 9. *Director of NASA takes a trip to Antarctica prior to alleged Moon landings; most likely to collect so called "moon rocks". *These are just asteroids; Antarctica because of the ideal conditions to find untainted rocks that easier to spot against the white background. 10. *Photos showing shadows cast in more than one direction, consistent with multiple spotlights rather than one sun.http://video.google.com/videosearch?...0steps%20on%20... 11. *Rocks with markings like on a movie set. 12. *Flag waving. *The way the flag waves in particular should be noted. *A flag doesn't wave in this way when manhandled. *Only wind moves a flag in such a way. http://video.google.com/videosearch?...0steps%20on%20... 13. *If you look at the moon rovers and the dirt they fling into the air, they are consistent with Earth gravity and not Moon gravity. *The dirt flies up and falls down in an arc consistent with earth gravity.http://video.google.com/videosearch?...0steps%20on%20.... 14. *When you double the speed of the footage, the astronauts appear to be running and skipping in earth gravity.http://video.google.com/videosearch?...0steps%20on%20... 15. *Astronaut descending into the shadow of the space vessel yet his body is lit up.http://video.google.com/videosearch?...0steps%20on%20... 16. *If it was real, there would be no errors or anything dubious to point out in the first place. *You can't argue with Truth. 17. Backlit objects being clearly visible from the front. *This indicates spotlights as used on movie sets. 18. *Area 51, where the moon movie was made has an area covered with craters ideal for a fake moon landing.http://video.google.com/videosearch?...0steps%20on%20... 19. No blast crater where the module landed. *The module is perfectly clean as well where there should have been dust settling on the craft from landing. 20. *The module crashed in tests on Earth and was very unstable and hard to control. *Armstrong had to eject to save his life. *Yet, it landed flawlessly on the Moon six times, leaving no blast crater each time.http://video.google.com/videosearch?...0steps%20on%20... 21. *The Russians were sent grain as payment to keep them from exposing the hoax. 22. Ooops! lol http://video.google.com/videosearch?...0steps%20on%20... This should be the correct video for 0 and 22: http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...5442&ei=3ajeSO... Aaron Russo before he died revealed what Rockefeller divulged to him:http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...07&vt=lf&hl=en Full interview with Aaron Russo: http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...26590918&hl=en |
|
#5
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
9/11 and Moon Landing Hoax explained
On Sep 27, 11:35*pm, wrote:
On Sep 27, 11:24*pm, wrote: On Sep 27, 5:45*pm, wrote: On Sep 27, 5:38*pm, wrote: Moon landing hoax and 9/11 explanation 9-11 1. *WTC building 7: After Popular Mechanics says that somehow air jet fuel, which can't reach the melting point of steel, was responsible for the pools of molten steel found... how do they explain the molten steel found in the third building WTC 7? This building was never hit by an aircraft and suffered a small hit from debris. How do they explain the molten steel in this building? *Molten steel can't be created by the temperatures of air craft fuel. 2. *Designers of the WTC said the buildings could withstand multiple hits from aircraft. 3. *Why the cover up of any sort of scientific investigation? *If there is nothing to hide why cover up the evidence? 4. *Explosions reported by eye witnesses are consistent with controlled demolitions. 5. *Why did the buildings fall in free fall rather than topple over? In order to do so, you have to get under the building and cut its supports from underneath. *The planes hit the tops of the buildings. 6. *These are the first three steel frame buildings to ever collapse from fire, all on the same day, in symmetrical "freefall" fashion (as in professional demolitions).http://www.serendipity.li/wot/other_...ther_fires.htm 7. *The owner of the buildings getting them insured and getting more than he insured them for. *This after the buildings had been condemned. *It seems like Silverstein wanted them destroyed so he wouldn’t have to spend the money renovating them and the government was all too happy to assist him and cover up the actual cause of the collapse as an excuse to claim a war on terrorism, erode our rights, and a pretext to control huge resources of oil in Iraq. *Our government is nothing more than a mafia, with the Godfather(s) being the elite. *These elite are the international banking cartels. 8. *Try Zeitgeist for starters and much more info. http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/ ----------------------- Moon Landing 0. *Ooops. http://video.google.com/videosearch?...0steps%20on%20... 1. *Astronauts didn't seem proud on return. *If they had actually gone you would think they would be enthusiastic upon returning but it was the opposite, they seemed ashamed of what they'd done. 2. Technology was at the point where we could just go into orbit around the Earth with a manned vessel. *Yet somehow, we took a giant leap and landed a manned vessel on the moon. *Then we also took off from the moon with ease and returned safely, passing through the Van Allen Radiation Belt a second time unscathed? 3. *The Van Allen Radiation Belt around earth contains deadly radiation that would kill any astronauts in a vessel attempting to go through it on the way to the moon. *We didn't have the technology nor do we have it now to safely pass through it with a manned vessel. "It is the belief of John Mauldin, a physicist who works for NASA, that in order to be protected from the radiation, shielding at least 2 metres thick would be required. *Yet the walls of the Lunar Landers which took astronauts from the spaceship to the moon surfaces were according to NASA "about the thickness of heavy duty aluminium foil.."" http://durham21.co.uk/archive.asp?ID=102 This is a NASA physicist telling you this. *Do you see the irony in that? Besides, if they did make it past the belts, there is even more deadly radiation caused by the sun's flares on their way to the moon. *Yet the astronauts suffered no ill effects from all this radiation in a vessel that had shielding compared to heavy duty tin foil, and space suits that provided little to no protection. Not to mention that in the sunny areas where the astronauts are show to be frolicking about happily the temperature would have been 250 F above 0. *How many of you would last more than a minute in such extremes and at the same time run around without a care. *During the night, the temperature would fall 250 F below 0. *That space suit is supposed to protect you from all these hazards? *Right... http://video.google.com/videosearch?...0steps%20on%20... 4. *Camera trickery prior to alleged moon landing. * Why fake halfway to the moon when they can go all the way to the moon? http://video.google.com/videosearch?...ings%20faked&u... 5. *No stars in the photos. *Yeah I know about the camera exposure explanation; this is one of the only explanations debunkers give that has any substance. *Even letting that slip, you're telling me you go all the way to the moon and take thousands of photos but not one of them has stars in them, not even partial exposure, not even a trace? Keep in mind there is no atmosphere to obscure the stars and the stars would be much more visible and brighter; like the view from a desert but even more intense and pure, not dim and easy to obscure as debunkers would have you believe. *The view of the stars from the moon without an atmosphere to obscure the light would be incredible. *Yet, these guys don't even take one photo of the stars? *They don't even mention the stars. *Are you kidding me? *That would be one of the first things you would notice. *They don't mention them so that they don't bring them to your attention. 6. Dark Side of the Moon *Stanley Kubrick directed the holly wood moon landing hoax.http://video.google.com/videosearch?...%20of%20the%20... 7. Moon rocks. *You can find such rocks on Earth in places like Antarctica. *They are just asteroids or lunites that have dropped to Earth and have stayed in good condition because of the ideal stasis conditions that exist in the Antarctic. 8. *The Russians who were ahead of the USA in space exploration and technology could bring back about 10 ounces of moon rock at most with unmanned vessels, yet the USA managed to bring back hundreds of pounds of moon rocks in manned vessels. *How did this giant leap in technology happen over night? 9. *Director of NASA takes a trip to Antarctica prior to alleged Moon landings; most likely to collect so called "moon rocks". *These are just asteroids; Antarctica because of the ideal conditions to find untainted rocks that easier to spot against the white background. 10. *Photos showing shadows cast in more than one direction, consistent with multiple spotlights rather than one sun.http://video.google.com/videosearch?...0steps%20on%20... 11. *Rocks with markings like on a movie set. 12. *Flag waving. *The way the flag waves in particular should be noted. *A flag doesn't wave in this way when manhandled. *Only wind moves a flag in such a way. http://video.google.com/videosearch?...0steps%20on%20... 13. *If you look at the moon rovers and the dirt they fling into the air, they are consistent with Earth gravity and not Moon gravity. *The dirt flies up and falls down in an arc consistent with earth gravity.http://video.google.com/videosearch?...0steps%20on%20.... 14. *When you double the speed of the footage, the astronauts appear to be running and skipping in earth gravity.http://video.google.com/videosearch?...0steps%20on%20... 15. *Astronaut descending into the shadow of the space vessel yet his body is lit up.http://video.google.com/videosearch?...0steps%20on%20... 16. *If it was real, there would be no errors or anything dubious to point out in the first place. *You can't argue with Truth. 17. Backlit objects being clearly visible from the front. *This indicates spotlights as used on movie sets. 18. *Area 51, where the moon movie was made has an area covered with craters ideal for a fake moon landing.http://video.google.com/videosearch?...0steps%20on%20... 19. No blast crater where the module landed. *The module is perfectly clean as well where there should have been dust settling on the craft from landing. 20. *The module crashed in tests on Earth and was very unstable and hard to control. *Armstrong had to eject to save his life. *Yet, it landed flawlessly on the Moon six times, leaving no blast crater each time.http://video.google.com/videosearch?...0steps%20on%20... 21. *The Russians were sent grain as payment to keep them from exposing the hoax. 22. Ooops! lol http://video.google.com/videosearch?...0steps%20on%20... This should be the correct video for 0 and 22: http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...5442&ei=3ajeSO... Aaron Russo before he died revealed what Rockefeller divulged to him:http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...07&vt=lf&hl=en Full interview with Aaron Russo:http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...26590918&hl=en Why JFK was killed: Executive Order 11110 to ban the federal reserve: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_11110 JFK Speech on Secret Societies and Freedom of the Press: http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...38481080&hl=en |
|
#6
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
9/11 and Moon Landing Hoax explained
On Sep 27, 11:35*pm, wrote:
On Sep 27, 11:24*pm, wrote: On Sep 27, 5:45*pm, wrote: On Sep 27, 5:38*pm, wrote: Why was JFK killed? Executive Order 11110 to re-institute a silver and gold standard that would diminish the power of the federal reserve: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_11110 JFK Speech on Secret Societies and Freedom of the Press: http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...38481080&hl=en |
|
#7
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
9/11 and Moon Landing Hoax explained
|
|
#8
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
9/11 and Moon Landing Hoax explained
On Sep 28, 10:35*am, wrote:
On 2008-09-27 said: Irrelevant bull**** deleted. At least this time it wasn't cross posted to all sorts of unrelated groups. Below is the only response which is warranted. STANDARD USENET BONEHEAD REPLY FORM (version 9.5) *---- Written by: John Henry (check all boxes that apply) *Dear: * *[] Clueless Newbie * *[x *] Troller * *[ *] "Me too"-er * *[x] Inconsiderate poster * *[ *] Spammer * *[x] Dumbass * *[ *] Racist * *[ *] Expert on everything (EOE) * *[ *] Flamethrower * *[ *] News Groupie You Are Being Flamed Because: * *[ *] You obviously don't know anything about the topic at hand * *[ *] You are trying to make money on a non-commercial newsgroup * *[ *] You posted a picture (binary) in an unmoderated TEXT ONLY * * * * *news group * *[ *] You started a long, stupid thread * *[ x ] You continued spreading a long stupid thread * *[ *] You started a thread that has been discussed here continuously * * * * * *for the last year and a half * *[x] Your post is absurdly off topic for where you posted it * *[] You didn't pay attention to the originating post header and * * * * * posted a follow-up to crossposted robot-generated spam * *[ *] You posted a "test" in a discussion group rather than * * * * * in alt.test * *[ *] You posted a "YOU ALL SUCK" message * *[ *] You posted low-IQ flamebait * *[ *] You posted a blatantly obvious troll * *[] You followed up to a blatantly obvious troll * *[ *] You said "X rules, Y sucks" and gave no support for your lame * * * * * *statement * *[ *] You said "me too" to something and added NOTHING to the * * * * * discussion * *[] You make no sense * *[ *] You posted the same text multiple times * *[] You made a post yet failed to say anything * *[ *] You posted a phone-sex ad * *[ *] You posted "upside down" by just adding your comments to the * * * * *top of the previous post * *[] You seem to dumb to learn to trim your posts * *[ *] You posted a stupid pyramid money making scheme * *[ *] You claimed a pyramid-scheme/chain letter for money was legal * *[ *] Your margin settings (or lack of) make your post unreadable * *[ *] You posted SCREAMING in RANDOM CAPS (OR IN ALL * * * * * CAPS) for NO APPARENT REASON * *[] You posted a 1 line reply with PAGES of unnecessary quoted text * *[ *] You didn't do anything specific, but appear to be so generally * * * * * worthless that you are being flamed anyway * *[ *] You gave bad or dangerous advice * To Repent, You Must: * *[] Refrain from posting until you have a vague idea what you're * * * * doing * *[ *] READ every post in this group for two weeks so you can get an * * * * * *idea about what is discussed here * *[] Read every newsgroup you posted to for a week * *[ *] Give up your AOL account * *[ *] Give up your WebTV account * *[] Bust up your modem with a hammer and eat it * *[x] Jump into a bathtub while holding your monitor (monitor must be * * * * * plugged in) * *[ *] Actually post something relevant * *[ *] Post to alt.test * *[] Print your home phone number and address in your ads * *[] Be the guest of honor in alt.flame for a month * *[ *] Learn to format your posts properly so we can read them * *[ *] Nothing, we'll let you go this time * In Closing, I'd Like to Say: * *[] Get a clue * *[] Get a life * *[] Go away * *[ *] Grow up * *[] Never post again * *[ *] You need to seek psychiatric help * *[ *] Like a neutered dog, you just don't get it * *[] Take your gibberish somewhere else * *[] Go back to school and actually learn something * *[] Learn how to post or get off the Usenet * *[] Don't take offense at this, I just like to use this form * *[x *] All of the above Try to argue the points without resorting to name calling, Freedom to Fascism http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...80303867390173 |
|
#9
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
9/11 and Moon Landing Hoax explained
|
|
#10
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
9/11 and Moon Landing Hoax explained
|
|
#11
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
9/11 and Moon Landing Hoax explained
On Sep 28, 8:41*pm, wrote:
On 2008-09-28 said: NOthing relevant. I'm not arguing the points you stupid piece of ****!!! THis is an audio production newsgroup. We don't care about your conspiracy theory bull**** here. WE discuss audio production. THis isn't the art ****ing bell show. IF you want to discuss your black helicopter pipedream take it somewhere else. YOu quote two screens of text for two lines. YOu moan and cry because I hurt your little feelings. *I'm sorry but I'm tired of your horse**** in an audio group. THere are plenty of places to discuss your bull**** conspiracy theory. *Take it there. Just by posting in rec.audio.pro you prove yourself to have no consideration for anybody else. YOu are obviously too stupid to deserve to live. *DId I hurt your feelings? *TOo ****ing bad!!! To Geoff and all the regulars who feel that they want to engage this asshole: Engage it somewhere else if you have any respect for this newsgroup. Maybe lead him to rec.audio.opinion, where this piece of dog**** is just their style. Every truth passes through three stages before it is recognized. In the first, it is ridiculed, in the second it is opposed, in the third it is regarded as self-evident. ~Arthur Schopenhauer |
|
#13
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
9/11 and Moon Landing Hoax explained
On Sep 28, 9:32*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article , wrote: On 2008-09-28 said: NOthing relevant. I'm not arguing the points you stupid piece of ****!!! THis is an audio production newsgroup. We don't care about your conspiracy theory bull**** here. WE discuss audio production. THis isn't the art ****ing bell show. IF you want to discuss your black helicopter pipedream take it somewhere else. YOu quote two screens of text for two lines. YOu moan and cry because I hurt your little feelings. *I'm sorry but I'm tired of your horse**** in an audio group. THere are plenty of places to discuss your bull**** conspiracy theory. *Take it there. Just by posting in rec.audio.pro you prove yourself to have no consideration for anybody else. YOu are obviously too stupid to deserve to live. *DId I hurt your feelings? *TOo ****ing bad!!! To Geoff and all the regulars who feel that they want to engage this asshole: Engage it somewhere else if you have any respect for this newsgroup. Maybe lead him to rec.audio.opinion, where this piece of dog**** is just their style. Not really. *More like sci.electronics.design. Nova's pancake theory doesn't hold up, since the cores would be left standing and the pancake collapse would take about 90 seconds or longer due to the resistance each floor would encounter from the next. To fall in free-fall fashion in 9 seconds no resistance can be encountered as they fall. Also, steel beams were found lodged in buildings far away. If the building were simply falling where do these beams find the energy to explode outward at such a force to embed themselves in buildings far away? Also, there has been no explanation of the explosions in the lower floors. Not simply one explosion but many even before the planes hit. The NIST theory also doesn't hold up since the bottom floors were undamaged and would resist the fall of the upper floors in their scenario as well. They also didn't mention the explosions at all. As for building 7 they say they haven't finished researching it yet. They also don't account for the unusual way in which some of the beams were seen to have been cut. They were cut in the exact same fashion as you'd cut a beam with thermite. The substance you use in professional demolitions to make diagonal clean cuts as were found. The amount of molten metal found is inconsistent with the jet fuel fire theory. They said the beams were 'weakened' not 'melted'. So then why so much molten steel found? The temperature was not even near hot enough to melt the steel whatsoever, not even a little. So how did it get there? Also, if most of the fuel burned upon impact and lasted about 10 minutes at most, that means the fires were burning long after on much cooler burning materials such as office material. And if most of the building is steel and fire resistant materials how much fuel is left to burn? Where did the fire get fuel that would burn hot enough to weaken and melt the beams? If jet fuel can't burn hot enough to melt the steel all that's left is office materials such as paper, furniture, carpet, drywall, and such materials that burn at lower temperatures than jet fuel. Keep in mind the beams are also coated with fire resistant materials. The whole building is designed to withstand much more severe fires and multiple plane impacts as described by the designers. It could even stay standing during a hurricane. The intense smoke is evidence of an oxygen poor fire, meaning low temperatures and poor fuel. Why was the evidence shipped out of the USA so quickly? Why wasn't it allowed to be studied by experts? You'd think they'd want to keep the evidence for studying to have better research and conclusions to debunk conspiracy theories. Why the secrecy if there is nothing to hide? I don't think the debunkers of the conspiracy theories actually watch or read the opposing evidence to the official story. Why are they so eager to believe the official story that is perpetuated by the very people who funded and planned the destruction of the towers. The people who actually funded this and planned it are not your friends they just set the rules. They see you as serfs. On the other hand I'm trying to help you, to inform you, and you violently attack me. I've heard both sides of the story, have you? Have you watched the conspiracy theory videos? They are actually very good and have logical points made by people who actually built the buildings, structural engineers, physicists, and other experts in the field which this pertains. Also, you have no right to post my private IP information. That is a more serious offense than discussing my opinions in a civil manner. I'm free to exercise my right to free speech where I wish. Or are you in such a rush to reach a fascist society? This topic should be of interest to all people who would live in a free society. This isn't a joking matter, many people died, and are still dying because of the consequences. Don't you want to be sure of what happened so that your decisions based upon this incident are taken in the right direction? I have an interest in audio, but I have other interests as well. Why can't I discuss these issues in a civil manner with other people that are interested in audio? Why such violent animosity over rational debate? If you don't like the discussion don't take part in it, simple as that. |
|
#14
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
9/11 and Moon Landing Hoax explained
"Jenn" wrote ...
wrote: Engage it somewhere else if you have any respect for this newsgroup. Maybe lead him to rec.audio.opinion, where this piece of dog**** is just their style. Not really. More like sci.electronics.design. That statement doesn't reflect very well on YOUR judgment. |
|
#15
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
9/11 and Moon Landing Hoax explained
In article ,
"Richard Crowley" wrote: "Jenn" wrote ... wrote: Engage it somewhere else if you have any respect for this newsgroup. Maybe lead him to rec.audio.opinion, where this piece of dog**** is just their style. Not really. More like sci.electronics.design. That statement doesn't reflect very well on YOUR judgment. RAO has many loons to be sure. But based on a recent encounter with that other group... MAN! |
|
#16
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
9/11 and Moon Landing Hoax explained
On Sep 28, 11:09*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article , *"Richard Crowley" wrote: "Jenn" wrote ... wrote: Engage it somewhere else if you have any respect for this newsgroup. Maybe lead him to rec.audio.opinion, where this piece of dog**** is just their style. Not really. *More like sci.electronics.design. That statement doesn't reflect very well on YOUR judgment. RAO has many loons to be sure. *But based on a recent encounter with that other group... MAN! NIST was asked by opposing experts to discuss and debate the matter but they refused. If NIST is telling the truth why hide? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-IACd...eature=related |
|
#17
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
9/11 and Moon Landing Hoax explained
On Sep 28, 11:18*pm, wrote:
On Sep 28, 11:09*pm, Jenn wrote: In article , *"Richard Crowley" wrote: "Jenn" wrote ... wrote: Engage it somewhere else if you have any respect for this newsgroup. Maybe lead him to rec.audio.opinion, where this piece of dog**** is just their style. Not really. *More like sci.electronics.design. That statement doesn't reflect very well on YOUR judgment. RAO has many loons to be sure. *But based on a recent encounter with that other group... MAN! NIST was asked by opposing experts to discuss and debate the matter but they refused. *If NIST is telling the truth why hide? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-IACd...eature=related Proof that thermite was used to severe the steel beams! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FCqs...eature=related |
|
#18
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
9/11 and Moon Landing Hoax explained
On 29/09/08 8:12, in article
, " wrote: On Sep 28, 11:18*pm, wrote: On Sep 28, 11:09*pm, Jenn wrote: In article , *"Richard Crowley" wrote: "Jenn" wrote ... wrote: Engage it somewhere else if you have any respect for this newsgroup. Maybe lead him to rec.audio.opinion, where this piece of dog**** is just their style. Not really. *More like sci.electronics.design. That statement doesn't reflect very well on YOUR judgment. RAO has many loons to be sure. *But based on a recent encounter with that other group... MAN! NIST was asked by opposing experts to discuss and debate the matter but they refused. *If NIST is telling the truth why hide? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-IACd...eature=related Proof that thermite was used to severe the steel beams! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FCqs...eature=related What has this got to do with audio? -- Joe Kotroczo |
|
#19
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
9/11 and Moon Landing Hoax explained
"Joe Kotroczo" wrote ...
What has this got to do with audio? Clearly nothing. Plonk the nutbag(s) and get on with your life. They don't deserve our attention. |
|
#20
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
9/11 and Moon Landing Hoax explained
On Sep 29, 2:36*am, "Richard Crowley" wrote:
"Joe Kotroczo" *wrote ... What has this got to do with audio? Clearly nothing. Plonk the nutbag(s) and get on with your life. They don't deserve our attention. I've done enough spoon feeding here. Try to feed you purity and you spit it out. Feed you bull**** and you gulp it down quick. Some of you are too conditioned to understand the implications or importance of what has been said here. I'll leave you with the words of these famous conspiracy theorist and nut jobs: "The real rulers in Washington are invisible, and exercise power from behind the scenes." -Felix Frankfurter, justice of the U.S. Supreme Court 1939-1962 "The world is governed by personalities very different to what people that cannot see further than their eyes, believe." - Benjamin Disraeli (British Prime Minister) "... in politics nothing is accidental. If something happens, be assured it was planned this way." - Franklin D. Roosevelt "From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, etc.,… this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstruction of society on the basis of arrested development, of the envious malevolence and impossible equality, has been steadily growing." - Winston Churchill, 1920 "Behind the October Revolution there are more influential personalities than the thinkers and executors of Marxism." - Lenin "Secret societies have existed among all peoples, savage and civilized, since the beginning of recorded history...It is beyond question that the secret societies of all ages have exercised a considerable degree of political influence." - Manley P. Hall "... the powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences." - Clinton mentor, Prof. Carroll Quigley, author of Tragedy and Hope (1966) "I do not fear the Illuminati taking over this United States and doing away the Constitution, because they took over this country long ago, and the Constitution has not technically been in effect due to Presidential emergency decrees since WWII (and before that, too). Don't think for a moment you are going to vote the Illuminati out of office. They control the major and minor political parties. They control the process of government, they control the process of information flow, they control the process of creating money, and finally they control Christendom." - Fritz Springmeier "Give me the power of the money and it will not matter any more who is commanding." - Mayer Amschel Rothschild "The government should create, issue and circulate all the currency and credit needed to satisfy the spending power of the government and the buying power of consumers..... The privilege of creating and issuing money is not only the supreme prerogative of Government, but it is the Government's greatest creative opportunity. By the adoption of these principles, the long-felt want for a uniform medium will be satisfied. The taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest, discounts and exchanges. The financing of all public enterprises, the maintenance of stable government and ordered progress, and the conduct of the Treasury will become matters of practical administration. The people can and will be furnished with a currency as safe as their own government. Money will cease to be the master and become the servant of humanity. Democracy will rise superior to the money power." - Abraham Lincoln "The money powers prey upon the nation in times of peace and conspire against it in times of adversity. The banking powers are more despotic than a monarchy, more insolent than autocracy, more selfish than bureaucracy. They denounce as public enemies all who question their methods or throw light upon their crimes. I have two great enemies, the Southern Army in front of me and the bankers in the rear. Of the two, the one at my rear is my greatest foe. [As a most undesirable consequence of the war...] Corporations have been enthroned, and an era of corruption in high places will follow. The money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until the wealth is aggregated in the hands of a few, and the Republic is destroyed." - Abraham Lincoln "I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies . . . If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] . . . will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered . . . The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs." —Thomas Jefferson, The debate over the recharter of The Bank Bill, (1809) "Paper is poverty...it is only the ghost of money, and not money itself." -Thomas Jefferson "I sincerely believe the banking institutions having the issuing power of money, are more dangerous to liberty than standing armies." -Thomas Jefferson "Who controls money controls the world." -Henry Kissinger (Council on Foreign Relations) "Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything." -Josef Stalin (Russian Dictator) "The new world order will be built... an end run on national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will accomplish much more than the old fashioned frontal assault." -Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Journal 1974, p. 558 "We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent." -Paul Warburg, Council on Foreign Relations and architect of the Federal Reserve System In an address to the U.S. Senate. 2/17/1950 "To defend the New World Order, US soldiers will have to kill and die." -Arthur Schlesinger, Council on Foreign Relations -"Military men are just dumb stupid animals to be used as pawns in Foreign Policy." Henry Kissinger, Council on Foreign Relations -"The dirty little secret is that both houses of congress are irrelevant. America's domestic policy is now being run by Alan Greenspan and the Federal Reserve. America's foreign policy is now being run by the International Monetary Fund. When the President decides to go to war, he no longer needs a declaration of war from congress." -Robert Reich (Clinton advisor) Jan 7, 1999 USA Today “Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create money, and with the flick of the pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take it away from them, and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear and they ought to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But, if you wish to remain the slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create money." Sir Josiah Stamp - Director of the Bank of England (appointed 1928) "It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning." - Henry Ford "Every effort has been made by the Federal Reserve Board to conceal its power. But the truth is, the Federal Reserve Board has usurped the government of the United States. It controls everything here; and it controls our foreign relations. It makes or breaks governments at will. No man, and no body of men, is more entrenched in power than the arrogant credit monopoly which operates the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks. These evil-doers have robbed this country of more than enough money to pay the national debt. What the National Government has permitted the Federal Reserve Board to steal from the people should now be restored to the people. The people have a valid claim against the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks. If that claim is enforced, Americans will not need to stand in bread lines. Homes will be saved. Families will be kept. What is needed here is a return to the Constitution of the United States. The old struggle that was fought out here in Jackson's day must be fought over again. The Federal Reserve Act should be repealed; and the Federal Reserve Banks - having violated their charters - should be liquidated immediately. Faithless government officers who have violated their oaths of office should be impeached and brought to trial. Unless this is done by us, I predict the American people - outraged, robbed, pillaged, insulted, and betrayed as they are in their own land - will rise in their wrath and send a President here who WILL sweep the money changers from the temple." - Congressman Louis T. McFadden before the House of Representatives, in the midst of the Great Depression, 1932. |
|
#21
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
9/11 and Moon Landing Hoax explained
wrote in message ... On Sep 29, 2:36 am, "Richard Crowley" wrote: "Joe Kotroczo" wrote ... What has this got to do with audio? Clearly nothing. Plonk the nutbag(s) and get on with your life. They don't deserve our attention. I've done enough spoon feeding here. Try to feed you purity and you spit it out. Feed you bull**** and you gulp it down quick. Some of you are too conditioned to understand the implications or importance of what has been said here. I'll leave you with the words of these famous conspiracy theorist and nut jobs: "The real rulers in Washington are invisible, and exercise power from behind the scenes." -Felix Frankfurter, justice of the U.S. Supreme Court 1939-1962 "The world is governed by personalities very different to what people that cannot see further than their eyes, believe." - Benjamin Disraeli (British Prime Minister) "... in politics nothing is accidental. If something happens, be assured it was planned this way." - Franklin D. Roosevelt "From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, etc.,… this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstruction of society on the basis of arrested development, of the envious malevolence and impossible equality, has been steadily growing." - Winston Churchill, 1920 "Behind the October Revolution there are more influential personalities than the thinkers and executors of Marxism." - Lenin "Secret societies have existed among all peoples, savage and civilized, since the beginning of recorded history...It is beyond question that the secret societies of all ages have exercised a considerable degree of political influence." - Manley P. Hall "... the powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences." - Clinton mentor, Prof. Carroll Quigley, author of Tragedy and Hope (1966) "I do not fear the Illuminati taking over this United States and doing away the Constitution, because they took over this country long ago, and the Constitution has not technically been in effect due to Presidential emergency decrees since WWII (and before that, too). Don't think for a moment you are going to vote the Illuminati out of office. They control the major and minor political parties. They control the process of government, they control the process of information flow, they control the process of creating money, and finally they control Christendom." - Fritz Springmeier "Give me the power of the money and it will not matter any more who is commanding." - Mayer Amschel Rothschild "The government should create, issue and circulate all the currency and credit needed to satisfy the spending power of the government and the buying power of consumers..... The privilege of creating and issuing money is not only the supreme prerogative of Government, but it is the Government's greatest creative opportunity. By the adoption of these principles, the long-felt want for a uniform medium will be satisfied. The taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest, discounts and exchanges. The financing of all public enterprises, the maintenance of stable government and ordered progress, and the conduct of the Treasury will become matters of practical administration. The people can and will be furnished with a currency as safe as their own government. Money will cease to be the master and become the servant of humanity. Democracy will rise superior to the money power." - Abraham Lincoln "The money powers prey upon the nation in times of peace and conspire against it in times of adversity. The banking powers are more despotic than a monarchy, more insolent than autocracy, more selfish than bureaucracy. They denounce as public enemies all who question their methods or throw light upon their crimes. I have two great enemies, the Southern Army in front of me and the bankers in the rear. Of the two, the one at my rear is my greatest foe. [As a most undesirable consequence of the war...] Corporations have been enthroned, and an era of corruption in high places will follow. The money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until the wealth is aggregated in the hands of a few, and the Republic is destroyed." - Abraham Lincoln "I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies . . . If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] . . . will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered . . . The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs." —Thomas Jefferson, The debate over the recharter of The Bank Bill, (1809) "Paper is poverty...it is only the ghost of money, and not money itself." -Thomas Jefferson "I sincerely believe the banking institutions having the issuing power of money, are more dangerous to liberty than standing armies." -Thomas Jefferson "Who controls money controls the world." -Henry Kissinger (Council on Foreign Relations) "Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything." -Josef Stalin (Russian Dictator) "The new world order will be built... an end run on national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will accomplish much more than the old fashioned frontal assault." -Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Journal 1974, p. 558 "We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent." -Paul Warburg, Council on Foreign Relations and architect of the Federal Reserve System In an address to the U.S. Senate. 2/17/1950 "To defend the New World Order, US soldiers will have to kill and die." -Arthur Schlesinger, Council on Foreign Relations -"Military men are just dumb stupid animals to be used as pawns in Foreign Policy." Henry Kissinger, Council on Foreign Relations -"The dirty little secret is that both houses of congress are irrelevant. America's domestic policy is now being run by Alan Greenspan and the Federal Reserve. America's foreign policy is now being run by the International Monetary Fund. When the President decides to go to war, he no longer needs a declaration of war from congress." -Robert Reich (Clinton advisor) Jan 7, 1999 USA Today “Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create money, and with the flick of the pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take it away from them, and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear and they ought to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But, if you wish to remain the slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create money." Sir Josiah Stamp - Director of the Bank of England (appointed 1928) "It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning." - Henry Ford "Every effort has been made by the Federal Reserve Board to conceal its power. But the truth is, the Federal Reserve Board has usurped the government of the United States. It controls everything here; and it controls our foreign relations. It makes or breaks governments at will. No man, and no body of men, is more entrenched in power than the arrogant credit monopoly which operates the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks. These evil-doers have robbed this country of more than enough money to pay the national debt. What the National Government has permitted the Federal Reserve Board to steal from the people should now be restored to the people. The people have a valid claim against the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks. If that claim is enforced, Americans will not need to stand in bread lines. Homes will be saved. Families will be kept. What is needed here is a return to the Constitution of the United States. The old struggle that was fought out here in Jackson's day must be fought over again. The Federal Reserve Act should be repealed; and the Federal Reserve Banks - having violated their charters - should be liquidated immediately. Faithless government officers who have violated their oaths of office should be impeached and brought to trial. Unless this is done by us, I predict the American people - outraged, robbed, pillaged, insulted, and betrayed as they are in their own land - will rise in their wrath and send a President here who WILL sweep the money changers from the temple." - Congressman Louis T. McFadden before the House of Representatives, in the midst of the Great Depression, 1932. "Drugs will get you through times of no money better than money will get you through times of no drugs"-Fat Freddy's cat sometime around 1968 |
|
#22
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
9/11 and Moon Landing Hoax explained
wrote ...
I'll leave you... Promise? |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Moon Landing Hoax and 9/11 explaination | Pro Audio | |||
| hoax or coax? | Audio Opinions | |||
| Is the high end a hoax? | High End Audio | |||
Linear Mode
