just a reminder to those prone to 'forget' -- or who
are just plain ignorant of them in the first place --


http://skepdic.com/hiddenpersuaders.html




--
-S
"The most appealing intuitive argument for atheism is the mindblowing stupidity of religious
fundamentalists." -- Ginger Yellow

"Steven Sullivan" wrote in message
...

just a reminder to those prone to 'forget' -- or who
are just plain ignorant of them in the first place --

It is true that sighted comparisons can induce biases, although those of us
who try to be ruthlessly unbiased can minimize them. Unfortunately, while
ABX might appear to be an acceptable replacement for sighted testing, it has
been conclusively shown that it tends to reduce perceptual acuity.

Perhaps, in the future, double blind testing for audio equipment will be
refined to produce the same acuity as sighted testing. The problems appear
to be with fatal flaws in the specific procedures used, not the general
concept of blind testing.

Until that day, sighted testing will continue to rule in the audiophile
community, regardless of what the clueless, brain and ear damaged contingent
of borgs want to say.

Sighted testing Rules!

"Steven Sullivan" wrote in message
...

just a reminder to those prone to 'forget' -- or who
are just plain ignorant of them in the first place --


http://skepdic.com/hiddenpersuaders.html


They are NOT used for consumer purchasing choices
Not in audio, nor for purchasing any other consumer item.

Clyde Slick said:

They are NOT used for consumer purchasing choices
Not in audio, nor for purchasing any other consumer item.

I think Silly just wants us to toss a dollar into the collection plate.

Clyde Slick schrieb:

"Steven Sullivan" wrote in message
...

just a reminder to those prone to 'forget' -- or who
are just plain ignorant of them in the first place --


http://skepdic.com/hiddenpersuaders.html


They are NOT used for consumer purchasing choices
Not in audio, nor for purchasing any other consumer item.

You never were a fussy fresser when schmosing for a free meal. How was
the free toikey dinner this year, schnorrer?

"Louis Tsechmeister" wrote in message
oups.com...

Clyde Slick schrieb:

"Steven Sullivan" wrote in message
...

just a reminder to those prone to 'forget' -- or who
are just plain ignorant of them in the first place --


http://skepdic.com/hiddenpersuaders.html


They are NOT used for consumer purchasing choices
Not in audio, nor for purchasing any other consumer item.

You never were a fussy fresser when schmosing for a free meal. How was
the free toikey dinner this year, schnorrer?

*** AMTLICHES WARNING ***, das dieses ist, unlicensed Yiddish, in gewissem
Sinne genehmigt nicht vom Rat der pensionierten jüdischen Taxi-Treiber.
Offenbar ist dieses die Arbeit des Teufels!

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Steven Sullivan" wrote in message
...

just a reminder to those prone to 'forget' -- or who
are just plain ignorant of them in the first place --


http://skepdic.com/hiddenpersuaders.html


They are NOT used for consumer purchasing choices
Not in audio, nor for purchasing any other consumer item.

So what? How does that make them invalid for doing so?
Just because something isn't done, doesn't mean it shouldn't be done, or
can't be done.

wrote in message
ink.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Steven Sullivan" wrote in message
...

just a reminder to those prone to 'forget' -- or who
are just plain ignorant of them in the first place --


http://skepdic.com/hiddenpersuaders.html


They are NOT used for consumer purchasing choices
Not in audio, nor for purchasing any other consumer item.

So what? How does that make them invalid for doing so?
Just because something isn't done, doesn't mean it shouldn't be done, or
can't be done.
They are not used because they do not work. DBT=NFG.

wrote in message
ink.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Steven Sullivan" wrote in message
...

just a reminder to those prone to 'forget' -- or who
are just plain ignorant of them in the first place --


http://skepdic.com/hiddenpersuaders.html


They are NOT used for consumer purchasing choices
Not in audio, nor for purchasing any other consumer item.

So what? How does that make them invalid for doing so?
Just because something isn't done, doesn't mean it shouldn't be done, or
can't be done.

Have you tried ladybugs dipped in white chocolate?

"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote
in message ...


Clyde Slick said:

They are NOT used for consumer purchasing choices
Not in audio, nor for purchasing any other consumer item.

I think Silly just wants us to toss a dollar into the collection plate.


For more bird feed?

Steven Sullivan wrote:
just a reminder to those prone to 'forget' -- or who
are just plain ignorant of them in the first place --


http://skepdic.com/hiddenpersuaders.html
---------------------------------------
The latest version of the ABX chapel's incantation. " Our beloved Abx
has come on hard times. It is getting to be common knowledge that it
has not been validated by basic research and that it appears to
obliterate rather than uncover the differences between audio components
performing music. What do we do now? Let's smuggle it back in in
camouflage- let's pretend it is just DBT- what could be more
respectable?."
Or are they really giving up the indefensible? Reality knocking at the
door at last?
Ludovic Mirabel .

wrote in message
oups.com...

Steven Sullivan wrote:
just a reminder to those prone to 'forget' -- or who
are just plain ignorant of them in the first place --


http://skepdic.com/hiddenpersuaders.html
---------------------------------------
The latest version of the ABX chapel's incantation. " Our beloved Abx
has come on hard times. It is getting to be common knowledge that it
has not been validated by basic research and that it appears to
obliterate rather than uncover the differences between audio components
performing music.

No matter how may times you say it, it will never be true. ABX is one of
the most revealing ways of finding subtle differences.

What do we do now? Let's smuggle it back in in
camouflage- let's pretend it is just DBT- what could be more
respectable?."

It is a DBT protocol, one that is widely used and is never going away.

Or are they really giving up the indefensible? Reality knocking at the
door at last?
Ludovic Mirabel .

That knocking is just the sound of your hollow head.

wrote in message
ink.net...

wrote in message
oups.com...

Steven Sullivan wrote:
just a reminder to those prone to 'forget' -- or who
are just plain ignorant of them in the first place --


http://skepdic.com/hiddenpersuaders.html
---------------------------------------
The latest version of the ABX chapel's incantation. " Our beloved Abx
has come on hard times. It is getting to be common knowledge that it
has not been validated by basic research and that it appears to
obliterate rather than uncover the differences between audio components
performing music.

No matter how may times you say it, it will never be true. ABX is one of
the most revealing ways of finding subtle differences.
Lie.
A tale told by an idiot, all sound and fury, signifying nothing.
It certainly reveals that you are the Village Idiot, Mikey McKelviphibian.
Audiophiles do not use it, have no interest in it, and it is doubtful that
we ever will.




What do we do now? Let's smuggle it back in in
camouflage- let's pretend it is just DBT- what could be more
respectable?."

It is a DBT protocol, one that is widely used and is never going away.

Or are they really giving up the indefensible? Reality knocking at the
door at last?
Ludovic Mirabel .

That knocking is just the sound of your hollow head.
Mikey, you ARE rao's dope. There is no one on this group less intelligent
than you.