Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#81
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
The little chimp went berserk
On Apr 9, 12:30*am, "GeoSynch" wrote:
Marcy and Jilly eye one another: We were talking about Shhh! Shhh! is a solid writer. Aw, gwan. Like ... oh puke. Yes, as someone with ASD, you're uncomfortable and unfamiliar with the giving and receiving of compliments. Why don't you two go get a room or something? You're right, Boon. The Senator is losing it. |
#82
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
PLF loses his grip on reality.
On Apr 9, 11:00*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote: On Apr 9, 12:30*am, "GeoSynch" wrote: Marcy and Jilly eye one another: We were talking about Shhh! Shhh! is a solid writer. Aw, gwan. Like ... oh puke. Yes, as someone with ASD, you're uncomfortable and unfamiliar with the giving and receiving of compliments. Why don't you two go get a room or something? You're right, Boon. The Senator is losing it. This whole "responding to myself" jag is beyond dumb. There are many reasons to respond to the same post more than once. First, you need to make a correction. Second, you need to elaborate. Third, you see something the second time that you didn't see the first and you want to respond to that specific point (which was the case here). So how does one feel compelled to yell "CHA-CHING" and "SCORE" when this happens? It's not something a normal person would do or think. Never has PLF's autism been so obvious. It also shows how desperate he's become...he's clinging to his last feeble arguments, and they're slipping away. |
#83
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
PLF loses his grip on reality.
On Apr 9, 1:59*pm, Boon wrote:
On Apr 9, 11:00*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Apr 9, 12:30*am, "GeoSynch" wrote: Marcy and Jilly eye one another: We were talking about Shhh! Shhh! is a solid writer. Aw, gwan. Like ... oh puke. Yes, as someone with ASD, you're uncomfortable and unfamiliar with the giving and receiving of compliments. Why don't you two go get a room or something? You're right, Boon. The Senator is losing it. This whole "responding to myself" jag is beyond dumb. There are many reasons to respond to the same post more than once. First, you need to make a correction. Second, you need to elaborate. Third, you see something the second time that you didn't see the first and you want to respond to that specific point (which was the case here). So how does one feel compelled to yell "CHA-CHING" and "SCORE" when this happens? It's not something a normal person would do or think. Never has PLF's autism been so obvious. It also shows how desperate he's become...he's clinging to his last feeble arguments, and they're slipping away. I admit that it's my fault. We hit a nerve with him and now he's generalized the point to ANY instance of resonding to one's self: 12. Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! View profile More options Apr 7, 2:46 am Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion From: "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 00:46:48 -0700 (PDT) Local: Wed, Apr 7 2010 2:46 am Subject: The little chimp went berserk On Apr 7, 2:07 am, "GeoSynch" wrote: GeoSynch [The Greatest] observed: Marcie and Jilly trade beauty secrets: "I, on the other hand, have lovely skin." "People can't believe I'm the age I am." "I have almost no grey hair." "[M]y face is free from wrinkle or blemishes." (I frequently get complimented on the softness of my skin. It drives women into paroxysms of delight when they touch it. They always ask me what lotions and cleansers I use. "You must use the expensive stuff! Your skin is flawless!" they always say. They cannot believe it when I tell them I don't use any. None at all. That always drives them into paroxysms of jealousy.) Sounds like a couple of hussies about to get into a catfight real soon. ;-) And Boy George, incapacitated with another debilititating homo disease, isn't around to referee this impending melee. Yes, Boon, a nerve has been severely struck. A double response to this one shows how piercing this is to Senator Sugar's frail ego. He's probably whimpering and trying to wring his beard out right now. Why are some people born with clear, glowing skin, and others reduced to impatiently tapping their shoes on the floors of random men's rooms? It just doesn't seem fair. |
#84
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
PLF loses his grip on reality.
On Apr 9, 7:25*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote: On Apr 9, 1:59*pm, Boon wrote: On Apr 9, 11:00*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Apr 9, 12:30*am, "GeoSynch" wrote: Marcy and Jilly eye one another: We were talking about Shhh! Shhh! is a solid writer. Aw, gwan. Like ... oh puke. Yes, as someone with ASD, you're uncomfortable and unfamiliar with the giving and receiving of compliments. Why don't you two go get a room or something? You're right, Boon. The Senator is losing it. This whole "responding to myself" jag is beyond dumb. There are many reasons to respond to the same post more than once. First, you need to make a correction. Second, you need to elaborate. Third, you see something the second time that you didn't see the first and you want to respond to that specific point (which was the case here). So how does one feel compelled to yell "CHA-CHING" and "SCORE" when this happens? It's not something a normal person would do or think. Never has PLF's autism been so obvious. It also shows how desperate he's become...he's clinging to his last feeble arguments, and they're slipping away. I admit that it's my fault. We hit a nerve with him and now he's generalized the point to ANY instance of resonding to one's self: 12. *Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! * *View profile * More options Apr 7, 2:46 am Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion From: "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 00:46:48 -0700 (PDT) Local: Wed, Apr 7 2010 2:46 am Subject: The little chimp went berserk On Apr 7, 2:07 am, "GeoSynch" wrote: GeoSynch [The Greatest] observed: Marcie and Jilly trade beauty secrets: "I, on the other hand, have lovely skin." "People can't believe I'm the age I am." "I have almost no grey hair." "[M]y face is free from wrinkle or blemishes." (I frequently get complimented on the softness of my skin. It drives women into paroxysms of delight when they touch it. They always ask me what lotions and cleansers I use. "You must use the expensive stuff! Your skin is flawless!" they always say. They cannot believe it when I tell them I don't use any. None at all. That always drives them into paroxysms of jealousy.) Sounds like a couple of hussies about to get into a catfight real soon. ;-) And Boy George, incapacitated with another debilititating homo disease, isn't around to referee this impending melee. Wow...he responded to himself. CHA-CHING!!! SCORE!!! Yes, Boon, a nerve has been severely struck. I'm wondering if he has the intestinal fortitude to show up for another night of abuse. A double response to this one shows how piercing this is to Senator Sugar's frail ego. He's probably whimpering and trying to wring his beard out right now. I think he's crying like a little girl. But your description is more eloquent. And your skin, by the way, is lovely and glowing tonight. Why are some people born with clear, glowing skin, and others reduced to impatiently tapping their shoes on the floors of random *men's rooms? It just doesn't seem fair. Your average IT drone is pretty scary. I bet he hasn't seen a naked woman since his last sojourn to Tijuana. |
#85
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Senator Sugar tells all
Senator Sugar has "tapped" into a new romance:
Reaching ever deeper into that stale bag Nobody is interested in your sexual exploits, Senator Sugar. You apparently go for older men? |
#86
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
The little chimp went berserk
The vines grow ever more slippery for monkeyboy swinging through trees:
Sounds like a couple of hussies about to get into a catfight real soon. ;-) And Boy George, incapacitated with another debilititating homo disease, isn't around to referee this impending melee. Wow...he responded to himself. CHA-CHING!!! SCORE!!! But I didn't argue with myself like you did. So, sorry but no score, no cha-ching and no banana for you on this one. I'm wondering if he has the intestinal fortitude to show up for another night of abuse. And pass up the chance to make a monkey out of you all over again. I think he's crying like a little girl. More debating trade tricks on your part by trying to pre-empt something I've specifically said about you many times in the past (namely, sock a schoolyard bully like you in the nose and you go running crying like a little schoolgirl) while the only thing you can do is use the same old tired debating trade jargon you've used against Arny, Scott, Bobo, Bret and practically every other antagonist. But your description is more eloquent. And your skin, by the way, is lovely and glowing tonight. "I, on the other hand, have lovely skin," gushed Marcy Phillips. |
#87
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
The little chimp went berserk
Buffoon bumbled:
What, after snipping my point? What a cowardly move. Your deflective "point" ("Really? You don't exist here solely to attack others?") No, I don't. Do you see me attacking Shhh!? Jenn? Clyde? George? Anyone else here who actually discusses audio? That was you making that statement, bumbler, that I'm quoting. You're an idiot. You made the point that I was here to attack others. I replied with the above quote. Therefore it is an appropriate response. No, imbecile, you made the statement "Really? You don't exist here solely to attack others?" that I'm quoting you as having made. Go back and reread your own post (a few posts prior back) if you must to see that you in fact did make that statement. Your response of "No, I don't. Do you see me attacking Shhh!? Jenn? Clyde? George?" is in response to the question that you yourself posed of "Really? You don't exist here solely to attack others?" YOU ARE ARGUING WITH YOURSELF. And yet you're still seemingly to idiotic to realize it. Even now or so it would appear. Are you arguing with yourself again, lunatic? No. You do have an obsession with accusing others of arguing with themselves. I've just proven it that you are in fact arguing with yourself. Absolutely no doubt about it to anyone other than you, perhaps. This extremely weak argument always seems to appear whenever you have your back to the wall. We've been down this road before in the past, where I've nailed you arguing with yourself. And you denied it, obfuscated it, danced around it, but with the relentless pressure hammering away at you, you finally cracked and admitted that, yes, you were arguing with yourself, and then immediately tried to rationalize it away as something others have done, so no big deal, etc and then later on you're back denying all over again that you argued with yourself. Look at this entire thread objectively (a tall order, since your ASD prevents you from doing so), OSAF which a failed amateur like you is unqualified to make. and you'll see point after point where you've lost, deflected or merely given up without a response. Those bleatings of premature victory are your delusions getting the better of you. But here you are trying to claim victory because you think I'm responding to myself. You're arguing with yourself, not merely responding to yourself. Responding more than once to a post is fine if you're addressing another point that was missed the first time. No one in their right mind would think otherwise. I agree there, which is why I followed up on my post with Boy George refereeing the Marcy and Jilly catfight. But then one of you two bozos tried to give me grief for responding to one of my own posts, so I decided to return the favor when you responded to your own posts on multiple occasions. And then you started getting bent all out of shape over it, which is par for the course for a reeking hypocrite. Like ... SCORE! BIG-TIME SCORE!!! CHA-CHINGH-CHINGH-CHINGHH!!! BWAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAA!!! Talk about going berserk! LoL! That's precisely what you did. You've always had an easy time of it with Arny, Bobo, Scott and others, but not with me, for more often than not, I get the better of you and that just drives your solipsistic self ballistic. It was my "Here's the *real* checkmate move:" that sent you off into a red-misted frenzy resulting in the horrendous blunder of arguing with yourself wherein you didn't even recognize something you yourself had written shortly beforehand and your arrogant hubristic derangement erupted with you arguing with yourself. Sorry, pal...you lose. Again. No, chumley. You did. Again. |
#88
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
The little chimp went berserk
Buffoon blubbered:
First this: How would I know what behavior therapists think of anything? Immediately followed by this: So far the behavior therapists see no problem with my posting behaviors. And there you have it, Loony Tune Buffoon talking out of both sides of his personality disorder. Um, wrong again. Again your ASD has limited your ability to understand written communication. In the first statement, I say that I cannot tell what other human beings are thinking. That's a perfectly legitimate and correct statement. In the second statement, I say that the behavior therapists have no problem with my posting behaviors because they have told me so. Again, it's a perfectly legitimate statement that does not counter the first. Did you ask them what they *thought* of your *posting behavior*? The second statement invalidates the first. Logic isn't your strong suit, is it? Have they come up with a clinical definition for your dementia? I suggest Solipsistic Personality Disorder. Sorry, pal...you lose again. Logic would say otherwise, monkeyboy. Usually when you fall apart like this you wind up saying something like "Okay, everyone...I'm taking a break! Back in a few months." That's the sign of your utter defeat. I have to imagine you're very close to that now. I can sense the growing desperation (and sloppy thinking patterns) in your posts. You're making less and less sense, and becoming more and more agitated. Don't do this to yourself. Since you have nothing to contribute to the group, and since you're simply too dumb to participate, just leave. Now there's the real desperation creeping in. You are reaching ever deeper into that stale old bag of debating trade tricks in an attempt to save your monkey face. The same old recycled phrases and stock boilerplate you've used against every real and imagined antagonist. |
#89
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
An example of GeoSynch's autism in full swing.
On Apr 10, 2:46*am, "GeoSynch" wrote:
The vines grow ever more slippery for monkeyboy swinging through trees: Ah, how nice. The autistic boy is trying to write snappy, humorous sentences. Sounds like a couple of hussies about to get into a catfight real soon. ;-) And Boy George, incapacitated with another debilititating homo disease, isn't around to referee this impending melee. Wow...he responded to himself. CHA-CHING!!! *SCORE!!! But I didn't argue with myself like you did. Look at poor PLF, clinging to the last argument he has like a child with a lollipop. He's been revealed as having ASD, he's been outsmarted, and the only thing he has left is the accusation that everyone is arguing with themselves. Here's a test. Say the following out loud: "Yay! I got you to argue with yourself! I win! CHA-CHING! SCORE!" Say it to people in the real world. Note their expressions. Oh, wait. You have ASD. You can't understand things like body language, sarcasm and irony. That's okay. Just tell us when people say things like "You're right" or "You win!" Go ahead, do it. See what kind of responses you get to that feeble, worthless and desperate argument. It's the argument of an autistic person. It makes no sense to normal people. So, sorry but no score, no cha-ching and no banana for you on this one. I'm wondering if he has the intestinal fortitude to show up for another night of abuse. And pass up the chance to make a monkey out of you all over again. Oh really? Who else here thinks so? Who else here thinks that you outsmart us, or trick us or win arguments against us? Name one person. Better yet, show your posts to your friends (ha ha), co-workers or family. Be proud and show them what you do in your spare time. It's a simple test...if they clap you on the back and say what a good job you do, then you do make a monkey out of all of us. If they don't, and they won't, this is all an empty, worthless defense mechanism. You don't anger anyone here. You don't outsmart anyone here. You don't win any arguments here. You're autistic. Look at yourself (if you can). You're pitied, ignored and ridiculed on a constant basis. No one sticks up for you or aligns themselves on your side. No one even responds to you unless they are mocking you, challenging you or outsmarting you. And you seem to like it, since you can't seem to tear yourself away. That's pretty weird. Then again, people with ASD do very strange days in their daily lives. They get into routines and they can't break them. That's why even though you say things like "I'm taking a break...see you in a few months," it's very easy to troll you and get you to come right back. Like Scott, you're addicted to the abuse you receive here. Does that sound normal to you? Better yet, does that sound normal to your friends, family and co-workers? I think he's crying like a little girl. More debating trade tricks on your part by trying to pre-empt something I've specifically said about you many times in the past (namely, sock a schoolyard bully like you in the nose and you go running crying like a little schoolgirl) while the only thing you can do is use the same old tired debating trade jargon you've used against Arny, Scott, Bobo, Bret and practically every other antagonist. Translation: "WAAAAAAAAHHH!" LoL! But your description is more eloquent. And your skin, by the way, is lovely and glowing tonight. "I, on the other hand, have lovely skin," gushed Marcy Phillips. I don't know why you keep repeating your past mistakes like this. That's a HUGE sign of autism, that you simply can't process new information when you're still attached to the old, incorrect ideas. A behavioral therapist can help you with these problem behaviors. I can give you a referral if needed. |
#90
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
The little chimp went berserk
On Apr 10, 3:14*am, "GeoSynch" wrote:
Buffoon bumbled: What, after snipping my point? What a cowardly move. Your deflective "point" ("Really? You don't exist here solely to attack others?") No, I don't. Do you see me attacking Shhh!? Jenn? Clyde? George? Anyone else here who actually discusses audio? That was you making that statement, bumbler, that I'm quoting. You're an idiot. You made the point that I was here to attack others. I replied with the above quote. Therefore it is an appropriate response. No, imbecile, Imbecile? Really, more name calling? I guess that's all you have left...name calling and accusing me of arguing with myself. That's pretty sad. you made the statement "Really? You don't exist here solely to attack others?" that I'm quoting you as having made. Go back and reread your own post (a few posts prior back) if you must to see that you in fact did make that statement. Your response of "No, I don't. Do you see me attacking Shhh!? Jenn? Clyde? George?" is in response to the question that you yourself posed of "Really? You don't exist here solely to attack others?" Chalk it up to your poor writing skills then. I honestly could care less what you wrote. Your confused ideas are buried in this sea of mawkishness, so forgive me if I don't analyze every word. As someone with ASD, you must be used to people not understaqnding what you say or write. That's why you say things like "You're arguing with yourself." You think it's because you have tricked people, when really it's due to your somewhat convoluted sentence structure and strange thought processes. I bet you run into this in the real world as well. People are so stupid, aren't they! Everything you write goes over people's heads! LoL! YOU ARE ARGUING WITH YOURSELF. Yes, PLF, we're all arguing with ourselves. You're such a master of the written word that whenever we respond to you we're really responding to ourselves! No one can argue with you! You're just too brilliant! Oh, what am I doing? You are autistic. You can't understand things like sarcasm or irony. Sorry to confuse you. LoL! And yet you're still seemingly to [sic] idiotic to realize it. Even now or so it would appear. Do you know the difference between "too" and "to"? How many of your synapses misfired to create that thought process error? Are you arguing with yourself again, lunatic? No. You do have an obsession with accusing others of arguing with themselves. I've just proven it that you are in fact arguing with yourself. Absolutely no doubt about it to anyone other than you, perhaps. Actually, you're the only one who believes this. Just you, an autistic person. I can live with that. This extremely weak argument always seems to appear whenever you have your back to the wall. We've been down this road before in the past, where I've nailed you arguing with yourself. Nope, sorry. We've been down this road before because this is what magically pull out whenever your back is against the wall. It happens every time. No one falls for it. No one cares. It's a weak, feeble argument at best, and it reveals your weaknesses when it comes to the debating trade. Your autism will always betray you by making you commit the same mistakes over and over. And you denied it, obfuscated it, danced around it, but with the relentless pressure hammering away at you, you finally cracked and admitted that, yes, you were arguing with yourself, and then immediately tried to rationalize it away as something others have done, so no big deal, etc and then later on you're back denying all over again that you argued with yourself.. Wow, that's quite a fantasy you have there. Look at this entire thread objectively (a tall order, since your ASD prevents you from doing so), OSAF which a failed amateur like you is unqualified to make. Nope...the two behavioral therapists have identified you, Scott and Bratzi as providing classic symptoms of ASD. and you'll see point after point where you've lost, deflected or merely given up without a response. Those bleatings of premature victory are your delusions getting the better of you. Oh, I won this argument a long time ago. You're just being contrary now. But here you are trying to claim victory because you think I'm responding to myself. You're arguing with yourself, not merely responding to yourself. Sure, whatever you say, autistic boy. Responding more than once to a post is fine if you're addressing another point that was missed the first time. No one in their right mind would think otherwise. I agree there, which is why I followed up on my post with Boy George refereeing the Marcy and Jilly catfight. Look at that sentence! You have to create fantasy versions of everyone in order to talk about them. It's beyond your capabilities to refer to people by their names or handles because you can't empower them as real people. LoL! (That's another hint you're autistic, by the way.) But then one of you two bozos tried to give me grief for responding to one of my own posts, so I decided to return the favor when you responded to your own posts on multiple occasions. And then you started getting bent all out of shape over it, which is par for the course for a reeking hypocrite. Sure, we're all hypocrites. Yet Shhh! and I have shown several instances of you responding to yourself, making typos, all the things you rail against. Like I said, autism prevents you from having any self-awareness. Like ... SCORE! BIG-TIME SCORE!!! CHA-CHINGH-CHINGH-CHINGHH!!! BWAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAA!!! Talk about going berserk! LoL! That's precisely what you did. You've always had an easy time of it with Arny, Bobo, Scott and others, but not with me, for more often than not, I get the better of you and that just drives your solipsistic self ballistic. Yes, of course. You're much smarter than everyone else. People are so stupid. It was my "Here's the *real* checkmate move:" that sent you off into a red-misted frenzy Remember...you don't get anyone mad. You don't get anyone upset. You think they do, but they don't. You need to tell yourself that they do, because that's your motivation. But your autism prevents you from really telling you how people respond to you. This is a huge part of your autism, that you put people into "red- misted frenzies." If there's a single thing that proves you have ASD, it's this. resulting in the horrendous blunder of arguing with yourself Horrendous? Look around. Does anyone other than you think this? wherein you didn't even recognize something you yourself had written shortly beforehand and your arrogant hubristic derangement erupted with you arguing with yourself. Sorry, pal...you lose. Again. No, chumley. You did. Again. Look around. Does anyone else feel the same way you do? That should be an important clue to the depth of your autism. The more alone you are in your thoughts and beliefs, the more profound the ASD. |
#91
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
The little chimp went berserk
On Apr 10, 3:24*am, "GeoSynch" wrote:
Buffoon blubbered: First this: How would I know what behavior therapists think of anything? Immediately followed by this: So far the behavior therapists see no problem with my posting behaviors. And there you have it, Loony Tune Buffoon talking out of both sides of his personality disorder. Um, wrong again. Again your ASD has limited your ability to understand written communication. In the first statement, I say that I cannot tell what other human beings are thinking. That's a perfectly legitimate and correct statement. In the second statement, I say that the behavior therapists have no problem with my posting behaviors because they have told me so. Again, it's a perfectly legitimate statement that does not counter the first. Did you ask them what they *thought* of your *posting behavior*? No, they told me. The second statement invalidates the first. No, it doesn't. Logic isn't your strong suit, is it? Yes, it is. Have they come up with a clinical definition for your dementia? I suggest Solipsistic Personality Disorder. Sorry, pal...you lose again. Logic would say otherwise, monkeyboy. Logic says you're autistic. That's what logic says. ' Usually when you fall apart like this you wind up saying something like "Okay, everyone...I'm taking a break! Back in a few months." That's the sign of your utter defeat. I have to imagine you're very close to that now. I can sense the growing desperation (and sloppy thinking patterns) in your posts. You're making less and less sense, and becoming more and more agitated. Don't do this to yourself. Since you have nothing to contribute to the group, and since you're simply too dumb to participate, just leave. Now there's the real desperation creeping in. Desperation again? Yes, we're all so desperate. You simply destroy us. After you're done with us, we have nothing left to live for. My, what histrionics! ROTFLMAO! You are reaching ever deeper into that stale old bag of debating trade tricks in an attempt to save your monkey face. Monkey face is a term of endearment. Couple that to the fact yopu keep calling me Marcy, and I'd say that you are as gay as the day is long. Not that there's anything wrong with that. You shouldn't get upset over being gay, you should get upset over being autistic and not knowing it. Tell me this...are you surprised by the fact that you're autistic? Is this all new to you? Or do you know you're autistic and you're just trying to hide it from us? I can't tell, and neither can the behavior therapists. The same old recycled phrases and stock boilerplate you've used against every real and imagined antagonist. Imagined antagonist? Name one. |
#92
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
The little chimp went berserk
BaBoon howled:
First this: How would I know what behavior therapists think of anything? Immediately followed by this: So far the behavior therapists see no problem with my posting behaviors. And there you have it, Loony Tune Buffoon talking out of both sides of his personality disorder. Um, wrong again. Again your ASD has limited your ability to understand written communication. In the first statement, I say that I cannot tell what other human beings are thinking. That's a perfectly legitimate and correct statement. In the second statement, I say that the behavior therapists have no problem with my posting behaviors because they have told me so. Again, it's a perfectly legitimate statement that does not counter the first. Did you ask them what they *thought* of your *posting behavior*? No, they told me. Sorry, reeking hypocrite, but that's a brazen lie. "How would I know what behavior therapists think of anything?" you state. Having interacted with them, you had to have asked them what they thought of Arny's or Scott's or my "posting behavior" and if they responded to you, then you would *know* what they were thinking unless you're too dense to realize that their response was predicated on what they *thought* before formulating a response. Furthermore, they supposedly saw "no problem" with your posting behavior without you having asked them about that specifically beforehand? Yeah, right! So, your above statement "No, they told me," is a brazen lie as is the initial statement of "How would I know what behavior therapists think of anything?" The second statement invalidates the first. No, it doesn't. Yes, it does. Logic isn't your strong suit, is it? Yes, it is. Fraid not, old bean. |
#93
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
The little chimp went berserk
Buffoon bumbled:
You're an idiot. No, imbecile, Imbecile? Really, more name calling? Pot. Kettle. Etc. What a maroon ... not to mention a reeking hypocrite to boot! you made the statement "Really? You don't exist here solely to attack others?" that I'm quoting you as having made. Go back and reread your own post (a few posts prior back) if you must to see that you in fact did make that statement. Your response of "No, I don't. Do you see me attacking Shhh!? Jenn? Clyde? George?" is in response to the question that you yourself posed of "Really? You don't exist here solely to attack others?" Chalk it up to your poor writing skills then. I honestly could care less what you wrote. Your confused ideas are buried in this sea of mawkishness, so forgive me if I don't analyze every word. It's like deja vu all over again. The bumbler is starting to crack under pressure that he completely lost it and began arguing with himself after my triumphant declaration of "Here's the *real* checkmate move." But surely as night follows day, he immediately starts to try and rationalize away and laying the groundwork for excuses as to why he strenuously began arguing with himself. Are you arguing with yourself again, lunatic? No. You do have an obsession with accusing others of arguing with themselves. I've just proven it that you are in fact arguing with yourself. Absolutely no doubt about it to anyone other than you, perhaps. Actually, you're the only one who believes this. Fraid not, old bean, as it's glaringly obvious to everybody else you argued with yourself as I've demo[n]strably proven. |
#94
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
The little chimp went berserk
Buffoon bumbled:
You were caught out arguing with yourself again which is completely different than responding to your own post. No, I wasn't arguing with myself. This is a tired old debating trade trick of yours. You always pull this out when you have nothing left to say and your back is against the wall. That's a novelty: blaming me for your inability to recognize what you'd previously written and then proceeding to strenuously argue against that very statement you previously had made. It's not something a normal person would do or think. If you mean arguing with yourself, then yes, I agree, that's not something a normal person would do, but an unhinged lunatic on the other hand... Blah blah blah, debating trade trick, blah blah blah. Yep, the bumbler is definitely starting to crack under pressure. Never has PLF's autism been so obvious. It also shows how desperate he's become...he's clinging to his last feeble arguments, and they're slipping away. Reaching ever deeper into that stale bag of debating trade tricks is far more indicative of your increasing desperation. "Desperation"? Haven't you complained when I've used that word to describe you, reeking hypocrite? Desperation intensifies as that stale bag of debating trade tricks fails to deliver the goods. |
#95
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
The little chimp went berserk
On Apr 10, 11:05�pm, "GeoSynch" wrote:
BaBoon howled: First this: How would I know what behavior therapists think of anything? Immediately followed by this: So far the behavior therapists see no problem with my posting behaviors. And there you have it, Loony Tune Buffoon talking out of both sides of his personality disorder. Um, wrong again. Again your ASD has limited your ability to understand written communication. In the first statement, I say that I cannot tell what other human beings are thinking. That's a perfectly legitimate and correct statement. In the second statement, I say that the behavior therapists have no problem with my posting behaviors because they have told me so. Again, it's a perfectly legitimate statement that does not counter the first. Did you ask them what they *thought* of your *posting behavior*? No, they told me. Sorry, reeking hypocrite, but that's a brazen lie. Prove it. "How would I know what behavior therapists think of anything?" you state. Having interacted with them, you had to have asked them what they thought of Arny's or Scott's or my "posting behavior" and if they responded to you, then you would *know* what they were thinking unless you're too dense to realize that their response was predicated on what they *thought* before formulating a response. You're assuming that I asked a certain question. I didn't ask that particular question. Unless you were there (and you weren't), this is another fantasy construct of yours. Furthermore, they supposedly saw "no problem" with your posting behavior without you having asked them about that specifically beforehand? Yeah, right! �So, your above statement "No, they told me," is a brazen lie as is the initial statement of "How would I know what behavior therapists think of anything?" You make absolutely no sense here. Your entire argument is based upon what you think we said to one another. That's impossible, of course, so it becomes obvious that you lied. Again. The second statement invalidates the first. No, it doesn't. Yes, it does. Logic isn't your strong suit, is it? Yes, it is. Fraid not, old bean. Fraid so, autistic boy. Your intellectual inferiority is alwys proven by your inability to emply given facts to support your case. Instead, all of your arguments are based upon guesses. Since you suffer from ASD, all of those guesses are tainted by your skewed view of the world around you. You lose. Again. |
#96
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
The little chimp went berserk
On Apr 10, 11:05�pm, "GeoSynch" wrote:
Buffoon bumbled: You're an idiot. No, imbecile, Imbecile? Really, more name calling? Pot. Kettle. Etc. What a maroon ... not to mention a reeking hypocrite to boot! You answer the charge of name calling by calling me two more names? ROTFLMAO! God, you're dumb. you made the statement "Really? You don't exist here solely to attack others?" that I'm quoting you as having made. Go back and reread your own post (a few posts prior back) if you must to see that you in fact did make that statement. Your response of "No, I don't. Do you see me attacking Shhh!? Jenn? Clyde? George?" is in response to the question that you yourself posed of "Really? You don't exist here solely to attack others?" Chalk it up to your poor writing skills then. I honestly could care less what you wrote. Your confused ideas are buried in this sea of mawkishness, so forgive me if I don't analyze every word. It's like deja vu all over again. The bumbler is starting to crack under pressure that he completely lost it and began arguing with himself after my triumphant declaration of "Here's the *real* checkmate move." It's like deja vu all over again. Your back is against the wall, so you trot out that old chesnut about people arguing with themselves. You do it every time. That's when we all know you've run out of ideas and that you're grasping at straws. Normal people don't argue in this way. Autistic people, however, do. But surely as night follows day, he immediately starts to try and rationalize away and laying the groundwork for excuses as to why he strenuously began arguing with himself. There's no rationalizing. You're obsessed with "people arguing with themselves." It's never been a valid or effective argument, and it never will be. The only reason you're clinging to this strange idea is that you've run out of ammo. Are you arguing with yourself again, lunatic? No. You do have an obsession with accusing others of arguing with themselves. I've just proven it that you are in fact arguing with yourself. Absolutely no doubt about it to anyone other than you, perhaps. Actually, you're the only one who believes this. Fraid not, old bean, as it's glaringly obvious to everybody else you argued with yourself as I've demo[n]strably proven. It's only obvious to you, a person with autism. Why isn't anyone else backing you up on this? It's not a mystery to normal people. |
#97
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
The little chimp went berserk
On Apr 10, 11:19�pm, "GeoSynch" wrote:
Buffoon bumbled: You were caught out arguing with yourself again which is completely different than responding to your own post. No, I wasn't arguing with myself. This is a tired old debating trade trick of yours. You always pull this out when you have nothing left to say and your back is against the wall. That's a novelty: blaming me for your inability to recognize what you'd previously written and then proceeding to strenuously argue against that very statement you previously had made. Like I said, just ask someone you trust to examine the thread and support your points. Once you've done that, then you might have a point. It's not something a normal person would do or think. If you mean arguing with yourself, then yes, I agree, that's not something a normal person would do, but an unhinged lunatic on the other hand... Blah blah blah, debating trade trick, blah blah blah. Yep, the bumbler is definitely starting to crack under pressure. Why do you think I'm beginning to crack? Am I starting to accuse you of arguing with yourself? ROTFLMAO! Never has PLF's autism been so obvious. It also shows how desperate he's become...he's clinging to his last feeble arguments, and they're slipping away. Reaching ever deeper into that stale bag of debating trade tricks is far more indicative of your increasing desperation. "Desperation"? Haven't you complained when I've used that word to describe you, reeking hypocrite? Desperation intensifies as that stale bag of debating trade tricks fails to deliver the goods. Wow, an obfuscation. I guess you're about ready to take one of your "breaks," eh? That's always your final move. |
#98
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
The little chimp went berserk
Buffoon bumbled:
No, I wasn't arguing with myself. This is a tired old debating trade trick of yours. You always pull this out when you have nothing left to say and your back is against the wall. That's a novelty: blaming me for your inability to recognize what you'd previously written and then proceeding to strenuously argue against that very statement you previously had made. Like I said, just ask someone you trust to examine the thread and support your points. Once you've done that, then you might have a point. Non-responsiveness confirms it. You were arguing with yourself and you know it, but just can't bring yourself to admitting the obvious. It's not something a normal person would do or think. If you mean arguing with yourself, then yes, I agree, that's not something a normal person would do, but an unhinged lunatic on the other hand... Blah blah blah, debating trade trick, blah blah blah. Yep, the bumbler is definitely starting to crack under pressure. Why do you think I'm beginning to crack? Am I starting to accuse you of arguing with yourself? "Blah blah blah, debating trade trick, blah blah blah." ROTFLMAO! Indeed. Never has PLF's autism been so obvious. It also shows how desperate he's become...he's clinging to his last feeble arguments, and they're slipping away. Reaching ever deeper into that stale bag of debating trade tricks is far more indicative of your increasing desperation. "Desperation"? Haven't you complained when I've used that word to describe you, reeking hypocrite? Desperation intensifies as that stale bag of debating trade tricks fails to deliver the goods. Wow, an obfuscation. I guess you're about ready to take one of your "breaks," eh? That's always your final move. Is that what you're desperately hoping will happen? Don't bet your treehouse on it, monkeyboy. |
#99
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
The little chimp went berserk
Buffoon bumbled:
You're an idiot. No, imbecile, Imbecile? Really, more name calling? Pot. Kettle. Etc. What a maroon ... not to mention a reeking hypocrite to boot! You answer the charge of name calling by calling me two more names? ROTFLMAO! God, you're dumb. And you are a reeking hypocrite with your holier-than-thou "Really, more name calling?" antic, not even realizing you'd started it. Like ... SCORE! CHA-CHINGH! etc. you made the statement "Really? You don't exist here solely to attack others?" that I'm quoting you as having made. Go back and reread your own post (a few posts prior back) if you must to see that you in fact did make that statement. Your response of "No, I don't. Do you see me attacking Shhh!? Jenn? Clyde? George?" is in response to the question that you yourself posed of "Really? You don't exist here solely to attack others?" Chalk it up to your poor writing skills then. I honestly could care less what you wrote. Your confused ideas are buried in this sea of mawkishness, so forgive me if I don't analyze every word. It's like deja vu all over again. The bumbler is starting to crack under pressure that he completely lost it and began arguing with himself after my triumphant declaration of "Here's the *real* checkmate move." It's like deja vu all over again. Clever phrase, monkeyboy. Monkeyboy want banana? Your back is against the wall, so you trot out that old chesnut about people arguing with themselves.You do it every time. It's only happened once before that you were caught arguing with yourself and now here you are doing it again and getting nailed for it again. That's when we all know you've run out of ideas and that you're grasping at straws. I found a weakness and am exploiting it to the hilt and it is putting you under a great deal of distress. ;-) Normal people don't argue in this way. Autistic people, however, do. Grasping at straws like a flailing madman? But surely as night follows day, he immediately starts to try and rationalize away and laying the groundwork for excuses as to why he strenuously began arguing with himself. There's no rationalizing. You're obsessed with "people arguing with themselves." It's never been a valid or effective argument, and it never will be. The only reason you're clinging to this strange idea is that you've run out of ammo. Let me reiterate: It's only happened once before that you were caught arguing with yourself and now here you are doing it again and getting nailed for it again. I found a weakness and am exploiting it to the hilt and it is putting you under a great deal of distress. ;-) Are you arguing with yourself again, lunatic? No. You do have an obsession with accusing others of arguing with themselves. I've just proven it that you are in fact arguing with yourself. Absolutely no doubt about it to anyone other than you, perhaps. Actually, you're the only one who believes this. Fraid not, old bean, as it's glaringly obvious to everybody else you argued with yourself as I've demo[n]strably proven. It's only obvious to you, a person with autism. Why isn't anyone else backing you up on this? It's not a mystery to normal people. Do you continue to deny that you were once again caught arguing with yourself? |
#100
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
The little chimp went berserk
On Apr 11, 7:33�pm, "GeoSynch" wrote:
�Buffoon bumbled: No, I wasn't arguing with myself. This is a tired old debating trade trick of yours. You always pull this out when you have nothing left to say and your back is against the wall. That's a novelty: blaming me for your inability to recognize what you'd previously written and then proceeding to strenuously argue against that very statement you previously had made. Like I said, just ask someone you trust to examine the thread and support your points. Once you've done that, then you might have a point. Non-responsiveness confirms it. You were arguing with yourself and you know it, but just can't bring yourself to admitting the obvious. I could give a **** whether I was responding to myself or not. No one gives a ****. Only you, an autistic person on the Internet, a loser in real life, cares. It's not a valid argument. It's dumb. It's weird. It's not an argument a sane person would make. It's not something a normal person would do or think. If you mean arguing with yourself, then yes, I agree, that's not something a normal person would do, but an unhinged lunatic on the other hand... Blah blah blah, debating trade trick, blah blah blah. Yep, the bumbler is definitely starting to crack under pressure. Why do you think I'm beginning to crack? Am I starting to accuse you of arguing with yourself? "Blah blah blah, debating trade trick, blah blah blah." That's funny...I was thinking "Blah blah blah, you're responding to yourself, blah blah blah." ROTFLMAO! Indeed. Non-response noted. Never has PLF's autism been so obvious. It also shows how desperate he's become...he's clinging to his last feeble arguments, and they're slipping away. Reaching ever deeper into that stale bag of debating trade tricks is far more indicative of your increasing desperation. "Desperation"? Haven't you complained when I've used that word to describe you, reeking hypocrite? Desperation intensifies as that stale bag of debating trade tricks fails to deliver the goods. Wow, an obfuscation. I guess you're about ready to take one of your "breaks," eh? That's always your final move. Is that what you're desperately hoping will happen? Don't bet your treehouse on it, monkeyboy. I'm not "desperately" hoping anything will happen. You're here to amuse me. And you're doing a fine job, I might add. |
#101
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
The little chimp went berserk
BaBoon howled:
No, they told me. Sorry, reeking hypocrite, but that's a brazen lie. Prove it. I just did. "How would I know what behavior therapists think of anything?" you state. Having interacted with them, you had to have asked them what they thought of Arny's or Scott's or my "posting behavior" and if they responded to you, then you would *know* what they were thinking unless you're too dense to realize that their response was predicated on what they *thought* before formulating a response. You're assuming that I asked a certain question. I didn't ask that particular question. Unless you were there (and you weren't), this is another fantasy construct of yours. Sorry, monkeyboy, but you can't weasel your way out of this one. Furthermore, they supposedly saw "no problem" with your posting behavior without you having asked them about that specifically beforehand? Yeah, right! So, your above statement "No, they told me," is a brazen lie as is the initial statement of "How would I know what behavior therapists think of anything?" You make absolutely no sense here. Your entire argument is based upon what you think we said to one another. That's impossible, of course, so it becomes obvious that you lied. Again. Sorry, monkeyboy, but you can't weasel your way out of this one. Logic isn't your strong suit, is it? Yes, it is. Fraid not, old bean. Fraid so, autistic boy. Your intellectual inferiority is alwys proven by your inability to emply [sic] given facts to support your case. What a maroon. :-) |
#102
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
The little chimp went berserk
Buffoon bumbled:
Non-responsiveness confirms it. You were arguing with yourself and you know it, but just can't bring yourself to admitting the obvious. I could give a **** whether I was responding to myself or not. You weren't merely responding to yourself (as you've done in other posts), but rather you were arguing with yourself, something only mentally unhinged lunatics have a tendency to do. |
#103
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
The little chimp went berserk
On Apr 11, 8:17�pm, "GeoSynch" wrote:
Buffoon bumbled: Non-responsiveness confirms it. You were arguing with yourself and you know it, but just can't bring yourself to admitting the obvious. I could give a **** whether I was responding to myself or not. You weren't merely responding to yourself (as you've done in other posts), but rather you were arguing with yourself, something only mentally unhinged lunatics have a tendency to do. Nope. That didn't happen. Sorry. |
#104
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
The little chimp went berserk
On Apr 11, 8:06�pm, "GeoSynch" wrote:
BaBoon howled: No, they told me. Sorry, reeking hypocrite, but that's a brazen lie. Prove it. I just did. Nope. You didn't. "How would I know what behavior therapists think of anything?" you state. Having interacted with them, you had to have asked them what they thought of Arny's or Scott's or my "posting behavior" and if they responded to you, then you would *know* what they were thinking unless you're too dense to realize that their response was predicated on what they *thought* before formulating a response. You're assuming that I asked a certain question. I didn't ask that particular question. Unless you were there (and you weren't), this is another fantasy construct of yours. Sorry, monkeyboy, but you can't weasel your way out of this one. Sorry, but I proved my point clearly. Your point, however, is lost in a autistic haze. The therapists concur. You're nuts. Furthermore, they supposedly saw "no problem" with your posting behavior without you having asked them about that specifically beforehand? Yeah, right! So, your above statement "No, they told me," is a brazen lie as is the initial statement of "How would I know what behavior therapists think of anything?" You make absolutely no sense here. Your entire argument is based upon what you think we said to one another. That's impossible, of course, so it becomes obvious that you lied. Again. Sorry, monkeyboy, but you can't weasel your way out of this one. I'm not weaseling my way out of anything. Tell me...who else here agrees with you? Anyone, anyone? That should tell you something. You know, that you're nuts. Logic isn't your strong suit, is it? Yes, it is. Fraid not, old bean. Fraid so, autistic boy. Your intellectual inferiority is alwys proven by your inability to emply [sic] given facts to support your case. What a maroon. :-) I think you're demostrably worse when it comes to typos. Reeking hypocrite. ROTFLMAO! |
#105
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
The little chimp went berserk
Buffoon bumbled:
Non-responsiveness confirms it. You were arguing with yourself and you know it, but just can't bring yourself to admitting the obvious.I could give a **** whether I was responding to myself or not. You weren't merely responding to yourself (as you've done in other posts), but rather you were arguing with yourself, something only mentally unhinged lunatics have a tendency to do. Nope. That didn't happen. Sorry. Fraid it did, old bean. |
#106
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
The little chimp went berserk
BaBoon howled:
Sorry, reeking hypocrite, but that's a brazen lie. Prove it. I just did. Nope. You didn't. Fraid so, old bean. Sorry, monkeyboy, but you can't weasel your way out of this one. The therapists concur. You're nuts. You're bananas. Sorry, monkeyboy, but you can't weasel your way out of this one. I'm not weaseling my way out of anything. Tell me...who else here agrees with you? Anyone, anyone? Can you get anyone here to agree that you were not arguing with yourself after it was demonstrably proven that you were? |
#107
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
The little chimp went berserk
On Apr 11, 8:33�pm, "GeoSynch" wrote:
Buffoon bumbled: Non-responsiveness confirms it. You were arguing with yourself and you know it, but just can't bring yourself to admitting the obvious.I could give a **** whether I was responding to myself or not. You weren't merely responding to yourself (as you've done in other posts), but rather you were arguing with yourself, something only mentally unhinged lunatics have a tendency to do. Nope. That didn't happen. Sorry. Fraid it did, old bean. Fraid it didn't. |
#108
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
The little chimp went berserk
On Apr 11, 8:39�pm, "GeoSynch" wrote:
BaBoon howled: Sorry, reeking hypocrite, but that's a brazen lie. Prove it. I just did. Nope. You didn't. Fraid so, old bean. I just threw up a little in my mouth. God, you're a putrid writer. Sorry, monkeyboy, but you can't weasel your way out of this one. The therapists concur. You're nuts. You're bananas. Sorry, but I'm right and you're wrong. Sorry, monkeyboy, but you can't weasel your way out of this one. I'm not weaseling my way out of anything. Tell me...who else here agrees with you? Anyone, anyone? Can you get anyone here to agree that you were not arguing with yourself after it was demonstrably proven that you were? Let's wait for the others. We'll see. |
#109
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
The little chimp went berserk
Chim Chimpsky conceded:
You weren't merely responding to yourself (as you've done in other posts), but rather you were arguing with yourself, something only mentally unhinged lunatics have a tendency to do. Nope. That didn't happen. Sorry. Fraid it did, old bean. Fraid it didn't. Ha-ha-ha! Checkmate. |
#110
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
The little chimp went berserk
Chim Chimpsky conceded:
Can you get anyone here to agree that you were not arguing with yourself after it was demonstrably proven that you were? Let's wait for the others. We'll see. Ha-ha-ha! Checkmate. |
#111
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
The little chimp went berserk
On Apr 11, 8:58�pm, "GeoSynch" wrote:
Chim Chimpsky conceded: You weren't merely responding to yourself (as you've done in other posts), but rather you were arguing with yourself, something only mentally unhinged lunatics have a tendency to do. Nope. That didn't happen. Sorry. Fraid it did, old bean. Fraid it didn't. Ha-ha-ha! Checkmate. Jesus Christ. Shut the **** up. You're really boring the hell out of me. |
#112
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
The little chimp went berserk
Chim Chimpsky conceded:
Ha-ha-ha! Checkmate. Jesus Christ. Shut the **** up. You're really boring the hell out of me. Admit that you were caught (again) arguing with yourself and then we can move on. |
#113
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
The little chimp went berserk
On Apr 11, 8:45*pm, Boon wrote:
Let's wait for the others. We'll see. I'm afraid I've stopped reading Senator Sugar's posts. He bores me. Specifically which posts did the Senator claim showed you arguing with yourself? |
#114
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
GeoSynch still refuses help for his autism.
On Apr 11, 9:57�pm, "GeoSynch" wrote:
Chim Chimpsky conceded: Ha-ha-ha! Checkmate. Jesus Christ. Shut the **** up. You're really boring the hell out of me.. Admit that you were caught (again) arguing with yourself and then we can move on. Then we're not going to move on. We're going to discuss the various aspects of your autism until you accept help! |
#115
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
GeoSynch bores everyone with his autistic mannerisms.
On Apr 11, 10:13�pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote: On Apr 11, 8:45�pm, Boon wrote: Let's wait for the others. We'll see. I'm afraid I've stopped reading Senator Sugar's posts. He bores me. Specifically which posts did the Senator claim showed you arguing with yourself? Who knows. He repeated it at least a dozen times. Honestly, if I did, it's because I barely read his posts as it is. He just repeats the same nonsense over and over. You know, like a person with autism. |
#116
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Marc Phillips Deranged Lunatic Argues With Himself
Buffoon burbled:
Honestly, if I did, You did. |
#117
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Marc Phillips Deranged Lunatic Argues With Himself
Chim Chimpsky conceded:
Admit that you were caught (again) arguing with yourself and then we can move on. Then we're not going to move on. So why do you argue with yourself on Usenet newsgroups? |
#118
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Marc Phillips Deranged Lunatic Argues With Himself
On Apr 12, 2:22*pm, "GeoSynch" wrote:
Buffoon burbled: Honestly, if I did, You did. Where? |
#119
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Marc Phillips Deranged Lunatic Argues With Himself
On Apr 12, 2:22�pm, "GeoSynch" wrote:
Buffoon burbled: Honestly, if I did, You did. No, I didn't. |
#120
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Marc Phillips Deranged Lunatic Argues With Himself
On Apr 12, 2:24�pm, "GeoSynch" wrote:
Chim Chimpsky conceded: Admit that you were caught (again) arguing with yourself and then we can move on. Then we're not going to move on. So why do you argue with yourself on Usenet newsgroups? I don't. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Two More Takes | High End Audio | |||
Anyone Know what tubes a Cembalet takes? | Pro Audio | |||
Sony Takes DRM Too Far | Pro Audio | |||
Music takes vision | Pro Audio |