Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#281
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
How safe operating an amp with no fuse?
Arny Krueger made us all laugh and laugh with this: I came to New York, I saw Atkinson and his disciples, and I conquered. Uh-huh. Sure you did. SURE you did, little Kruger.... And the only one telling you that, besides your fat failed self, is your wife. And that's only to quell your ****ing whimpering sobs at night, so she can get some damn sleep. |
#283
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
How safe operating an amp with no fuse?
|
#284
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
How safe operating an amp with no fuse?
wrote: For the 3,789,231,002 time, put his foot in his mouth and uttered: Not since I has elected President of my H.S. AV Club have I felt so honored What a shocker. And all the while, I fell under the assumption that you were elected President of the Grammar Club. Would someone else please state the minimum requirements for intellectual content in statements intended to be humourous. Hmmm... I'll take a shot: how about NOT sounding like a rebroadcast of an Amos N' Andy episode, for starters? Thank you for associating me with one of the hottest comedy duos of their media period. I'm also enjoying your imaginary quotes that your attributing to me. |
#285
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
How safe operating an amp with no fuse?
a écrit : wrote: For the 3,789,231,002 time, put his foot in his mouth and uttered: Not since I has elected President of my H.S. AV Club have I felt so honored What a shocker. And all the while, I fell under the assumption that you were elected President of the Grammar Club. Would someone else please state the minimum requirements for intellectual content in statements intended to be humourous. Hmmm... I'll take a shot: how about NOT sounding like a rebroadcast of an Amos N' Andy episode, for starters? Thank you for associating me with one of the hottest comedy duos of their media period. I guess you have no problem with the fact that they're one of the dumbest, and the most racially insulting comedy duo of their time, if not all time. But then, you've proven that you're about as evolved as the "whities" who got a kick out of listening to them. And I'm sorry if I just insulted your "pa", Cletus. By the way, I just hit the refresh button on my browser by accident, and that's when your latest waste of bandwidth appeared. I wasn't surprised to find that once again, only MINUTES after I posted something, you were there like some crazy self-humiliating clown, ready to receive another pie in the face. I don't know if I should be flattered that I now offically have a lowlife newsgroup stalker on my ass, or if you should be worried about the fact that you have absolutely nothing to do in life but troll me, in between getting up off your ass on occasion to check the mailbox to see if your welfare cheque arrived. |
#286
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
How safe operating an amp with no fuse?
wrote: a écrit : wrote: For the 3,789,231,002 time, put his foot in his mouth and uttered: Not since I has elected President of my H.S. AV Club have I felt sohonored What a shocker. And all the while, I fell under the assumption that you were elected President of the Grammar Club. Would someone else please state the minimum requirements for intellectual content in statements intended to be humourous. Hmmm... I'll take a shot: how about NOT sounding like a rebroadcast of an Amos N' Andy episode, for starters? Thank you for associating me with one of the hottest comedy duos of their media period. I guess you have no problem with the fact that they're one of the dumbest, and the most racially insulting comedy duo of their time, if not all time. But then, you've proven that you're about as evolved as the "whities" who got a kick out of listening to them. And I'm sorry if I just insulted your "pa", Cletus. By the way, I just hit the refresh button on my browser by accident, and that's when your latest waste of bandwidth appeared. I wasn't surprised to find that once again, only MINUTES after I posted something, you were there like some crazy self-humiliating clown, ready to receive another pie in the face. I don't know if I should be flattered that I now offically have a lowlife newsgroup stalker on my ass, or if you should be worried about the fact that you have absolutely nothing to do in life but troll me, in between getting up off your ass on occasion to check the mailbox to see if your welfare cheque arrived. Are you familiar with the scene from "Lethal Weapon" where the fella in the South African Embassy pointed out that Murdock was blek? I'll tell my wife that you noticed I was blek, she is too. Did you think I was a white trash honky? Counting my personal wealth by the number of pickup trucks on blocks in front of my trailer. ROTFLMAO I've put myself through college and had a real job for 20 years, so you can put that welfare stereotype to rest too. Since we are on the topic of being racially insulting, it was YOU that brought in the Nazi's twice and Amos N Andy. You give yourself way too much credit, if you consider this dialog stalking/trolling. Perhaps you should get a netcionary and get the sockpuppet, trolling,netstalking definitions clarified. My apologies to the others in this newsgroup for allowing this to be far less entertaining than just technically off topic. |
#287
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
How safe operating an amp with no fuse?
wrote in message
oups.com Arny Krueger farted out : wrote in message oups.com Snip childish rants, name-calling and back-biting When John Atkinson, a highly respected editor of a high end magazine that you attack relentlessly, originally challenged you to a debate, you almost died of a heart attack, in your mad, frantic efforts to come up with excuses to avoid showing up. Prove it. Ah yes. The two-word "prove it" response. Which you've used about 16,000 times in the last year alone, I believe, whenever you are losing a debate. That's of course, after you snip out the parts in the other guy's post where he's asked YOU to prove your claims. Is this your favorite debating tactic/trick, KKKrueger? A google group search will verify those facts for you. I'll even post the messages in question for the eternally lazy, once you prove the claims I asked you to prove in my last response to you. By ignoring my request that you prove your false claims, you're once again showing what a fat ****ing coward you are. How ironic, don't you think? Since you can't prove anything you said Mr. Ladbury, there's no need for me to do the same. |
#288
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
How safe operating an amp with no fuse?
wrote in message
ups.com The audio transcript is much better. You get to hear the audience laughing at KKKrueger's inane responses: http://www.stereophile.com/news/050905debate/ What the recording doesn't really highlight is the fact that I was promised the facilities to project a Powerpoint presentation that I brought along but such *high technology* exceeded my host's abilities. |
#289
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
How safe operating an amp with no fuse?
Arny Krueger wrote: wrote in message ups.com The audio transcript is much better. You get to hear the audience laughing at KKKrueger's inane responses: http://www.stereophile.com/news/050905debate/ What the recording doesn't really highlight is the fact that I was promised the facilities to project a Powerpoint presentation that I brought along but such *high technology* exceeded my host's abilities. The recording mentions your stupid powerpoint presentation, gaychub. What definition of the word "highlight" are you using today? Does "highlight" mean it has to be mentioned every 5 minutes? Who do you think besides you gives a flying **** about your "powerpoint presentation" anyway? Trust me, it would have just made the audience laugh harder at you, you fat ****ing loser. |
#290
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
How safe operating an amp with no fuse?
Arny Krueger wrote: wrote in message oups.com Arny Krueger farted out : wrote in message oups.com Snip childish rants, name-calling and back-biting When John Atkinson, a highly respected editor of a high end magazine that you attack relentlessly, originally challenged you to a debate, you almost died of a heart attack, in your mad, frantic efforts to come up with excuses to avoid showing up. Prove it. Ah yes. The two-word "prove it" response. Which you've used about 16,000 times in the last year alone, I believe, whenever you are losing a debate. That's of course, after you snip out the parts in the other guy's post where he's asked YOU to prove your claims. Is this your favorite debating tactic/trick, KKKrueger? A google group search will verify those facts for you. I'll even post the messages in question for the eternally lazy, once you prove the claims I asked you to prove in my last response to you. By ignoring my request that you prove your false claims, you're once again showing what a fat ****ing coward you are. How ironic, don't you think? Since you can't prove anything you said Mr. Ladbury, there's no need for me to do the same. Still up to your usual tired debating games, I see. Why would anyone expect you to take anything but the COWARD's way out, Kruger? This is the same **** you pull EVERY time you lose a debate. Given that you have the reputation of not only being the slimiest, most hated troll on the audio newsgroups, but the fattest and most cowardly. Sad pathetic creature that you are, all you can do is make the same predictable moves, over and over again. Fine: I asked you to prove your bull**** claims before you asked me to prove my claims. You still haven't done so, because you and everyone else who read it knows that you were lying. I told you I will prove whatever you wish, after you prove your false claims, as requested. Your move. (And if you're going to bother to keep playing the game with me, you fat nazi ****, give us a God-damned halfway intelligent ORIGINAL move, next turn). |
#291
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
How safe operating an amp with no fuse?
wrote:
wrote: a écrit : wrote: For the 3,789,231,002 time, put his footin his mouth and uttered: Not since I has elected President of my H.S. AV Club have I felt so honored What a shocker. And all the while, I fell under the assumption thatyou were elected President of the Grammar Club. Would someone else please state the minimum requirements for intellectual content in statements intended to be humourous. Hmmm... I'll take a shot: how about NOT sounding like a rebroadcastof an Amos N' Andy episode, for starters? Thank you for associating me with one of the hottest comedy duos of their media period. I guess you have no problem with the fact that they're one of the dumbest, and the most racially insulting comedy duo of their time, if not all time. But then, you've proven that you're about as evolved as the "whities" who got a kick out of listening to them. And I'm sorry if I just insulted your "pa", Cletus. By the way, I just hit the refresh button on my browser by accident, and that's when your latest waste of bandwidth appeared. I wasn't surprised to find that once again, only MINUTES after I posted something, you were there like some crazy self-humiliating clown, ready to receive another pie in the face. I don't know if I should be flattered that I now offically have a lowlife newsgroup stalker on my ass, or if you should be worried about the fact that you have absolutely nothing to do in life but troll me, in between getting up off your ass on occasion to check the mailbox to see if your welfare cheque arrived. Are you familiar with the scene from "Lethal Weapon" where the fella in the South African Embassy pointed out that Murdock was blek? I'll tell my wife that you noticed I was blek, she is too. Did you think I was a white trash honky? Counting my personal wealth by the number of pickup trucks on blocks in front of my trailer. ROTFLMAO I've put myself through college and had a real job for 20 years, so you can put that welfare stereotype to rest too. Since we are on the topic of being racially insulting, it was YOU that brought in the Nazi's twice and Amos N Andy. You give yourself way too much credit, if you consider this dialog stalking/trolling. Perhaps you should get a netcionary and get the sockpuppet, trolling,netstalking definitions clarified. My apologies to the others in this newsgroup for allowing this to be far less entertaining than just technically off topic. Yawn... As the Australians say, "**** off, netstalker". |
#293
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
What does it take to stop the big troll around here?
"Richard Crowley" wrote in message ... "dizzy" wrote ... wrote: usual drivel Plonk! You have a great deal more patience with the fools than I did. Many of us plonked him several days/weeks ago. He's clearly trolling, and got good milage before sussed., But it's run it's course, and "Plonks" only drag it out. Best ignore. geoff |
#294
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
What does it take to stop the big troll around here?
Geoff@home wrote:
"Richard Crowley" wrote in message He's clearly trolling, and got good milage before sussed. Um, it only took about an hour or so. Probably by the time he'd made ten posts. Read the thread from the beginning. Or not, you probably have something useful to do. (c: //Walt |
#295
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
What does it take to stop the big troll around here?
It's obvious that you don't have anything more useful to do, given the amount of times you added your garbage to my thread. And since you were the first ignorant twit to disparage me, just as soon as I posted my query no less, we can say that you're responsible for this thing going on over 300 posts. Don't forget to congratulate me on popping my 3rd century. I know how much you want to since you felt it necessary after the first 100 posts, but let's all see if you have the mental strength to avoid further contributing your mindless drivel to my thread, or if you're just too weak to avoid stalking me. Face facts Walt, you're the ignorant slut I say you are; mentally weak and puny.... |
#296
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
What does it take to stop the big troll around here?
Geoff@home wrote: "Richard Crowley" wrote in message ... "dizzy" wrote ... wrote: usual drivel Plonk! What happened, did you just take a dump in your pants, you ****ing retard? Christ, I knew you technophiles were all fat lazy ****s who spend more of their lives on newsgroups than learning about audio, but do you think you could maybe tear yourself away from my fascinating thread to go to the ****ing bathroom on occasion??! You have a great deal more patience with the fools than I did. Many of us plonked him several days/weeks ago. He's clearly trolling, and got good milage before sussed., But it's run it's course, and "Plonks" only drag it out. Best ignore. geoff It ran its course over 300 posts ago, you ****ing imbecile. I was the one "clearly being trolled" by the ignorant ****s on this group from the get-go. But no matter, I had a lot of fun laughing at the screamingly blind ignorance that spewed forth from you and your technophile buds over the course of these 300 posts, day after day. Whether comments about audio or about me, I"ve never seen so many falsehoods, ignorance and sheer stupidity gathered in such high concentrations since the last Republican convention. Whether it was about my fuse tweaks, my reason for originally posting, or anything else said in this thread, not one of you ignorant ****wits ever managed to prove a SINGLE thing said about me, using ANY standard of proof valid in the world today. However, I received well over 55 demands for proof on my end, from the various little RATs here, and although I ignored many since no proof of ANY claim was ever given to me, I offered far more proof of my claims than what I received. So if you think you have enough mental strength to finally avoid tossing in your worthless **** to my thread, which so few of you pathetic newsgroup junkies on this group seem to have, then you can **** off, and let the record show that I WON, for lack of any challengers! Okay, **** off now. |
#297
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
What does it take to stop the big troll around here?
wrote in message
oups.com Whether it was about my fuse tweaks, my reason for originally posting, or anything else said in this thread, not one of you ignorant ****wits ever managed to prove a SINGLE thing said about me, using ANY standard of proof valid in the world today. Thanks for confirming that this thread is really about you Ladbury. Thanks for dropping the pretext that this was about fuses or any aspect of serious audio. However, I received well over 55 demands for proof on my end, Of which you sloughed what, all 55? Ladbury, please come back when you have any proof for your claims that doesn't net out to be: "It's true because I say its true". |
#298
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
What does it take to stop the big troll around here?
Walt wrote:
Geoff@home wrote: "Richard Crowley" wrote in message He's clearly trolling, and got good milage before sussed. Um, it only took about an hour or so. Probably by the time he'd made ten posts. Read the thread from the beginning. Or not, you probably have something useful to do. (c: I spotted it on the OP. I figured it was just a joke, an audiophool send-up. I had no idea he'd get that rabid, but I didn't care anyway... ....'cause that's what trolls do. jak //Walt |
#299
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
What does it take to stop the big troll around here?
Arny Krueger's latest example of playing time-wasting head games with people: wrote in message oups.com Whether it was about my fuse tweaks, my reason for originally posting, or anything else said in this thread, not one of you ignorant ****wits ever managed to prove a SINGLE thing said about me, using ANY standard of proof valid in the world today. Thanks for confirming that this thread is really about you Ladbury. Thanks for dropping the pretext that this was about fuses or any aspect of serious audio. Equally, thanks for NOT proving a single claim you made to me. Thanks for IGNORING every incident where I asked you to supply proof for your claims, and responding with demands of proof from me, AFTER ignoring my demands for proof of your false claims. In doing so, you PROVE that your claims are all false, and you support my contention that you are full of pure, simple, ****. In fact, it appears you eat it for breakfast every day, and then regurgitate upon the newsgroups you troll during the entire day and evening. Only to be found at the breakfast table the next morning, eating a fresh new bowl of ****. How DO you do it, Krueger? The last time I checked Google, you had about a MILLION posts to your name, and about 3 MILLION all cursing your name. Thanks for purposefully getting it wrong once again and trying to put words in my mouth, btw. I've seen you do this with countless of people, and you're utterly hilarious. The last time I saw you do this was with the editor of Stereophile. Acting like a total stupid bitch again, you told him something to the effect that because he had not mentioned in his thread that he never used a funnel (yes, a FUNNEL, to can goods), that meant to you that he knew nothing about funnels. It's basically just THIS kind of backwoods, dumbass, twisted logic that you and your technofool supporters on this newsgroup are known for, and the reason that you in particular are a laughingstock on the audio boards. Unlike you, pathological liar that you have been proven to be, I have no problem being honest with the rest of the world about my motives for posting. So you didn't just "gotcha!" me as you were hoping. Even if I said I only came here to troll yo fools, I'd get away with it. That's because you and your techno-zealots really ARE the ignorant fools I say you are. Witness the fact that you still having nothing better going on in your life but padding my thread. After one of your fool buddies tried to create a sub-thread in my thread, called "What does it take to stop the big troll?". Apparently, fat-ass nazi KKKRueger wouldn't know, because he's busy feeding the troll! Your hilarious delusions aside, this thread was never about me. It changed, but it was only about a question I had. A question I could have answered 65 different other ways, so don't think this group of dumbass audiofools is the only resource on the net for technical information. But a question that yes, was answered privately about 305 posts ago. Problem is, because the very first response I got from you RATs was a personal attack on me, and nearly every one after that which followed, well you and your asshole friends attacked the wrong guy. A guy who has no reservations about mentioning the fact that while they were burying your ****ing DEAD SON you piece of ****, you and your fat ****ing nazi ass were right here on usenet, busy attacking people on the audio newsgroups. (Search "Dead Nate" via www.Google.com for more info) Now I know you and your friends are some of the most stupidest human beings to be found on Usenet, but I mean really... what kind of an idiot do you have to be to believe I stuck around for 3 weeks and 310 posts, attacking you lot of ignorant cretins, because I was merely awaiting an answer on whether or not I should employ a fuse in my amplifier? However, I received well over 55 demands for proof on my end, Of which you sloughed what, all 55? No, I've proven many of my claims. You "sloughed" EVERY SINGLE ONE that I asked you to prove. On top of which, you simply play these endlessly stupid head games with people, where you ignore their demands of proof, but ask them to prove things to you. Now if you were 14, that would make sense, I guess. But you're something like 66 years old, and you basically have nothing better to do in life than to play head games with people on usenet all day long, you sad ****. How pathetic IS that? Ladbury, please come back when you have any proof for your claims that doesn't net out to be: "It's true because I say its true". As you well know, my little mind-game playing nazi twit, I said I would prove whatever you wish, once you provide the proof to support your claims, that I asked of you. |
#300
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
What does it take to stop the big troll around here?
jakdedert: Walt wrote: Geoff@home wrote: "Richard Crowley" wrote in message He's clearly trolling, and got good milage before sussed. Um, it only took about an hour or so. Probably by the time he'd made ten posts. Read the thread from the beginning. Or not, you probably have something useful to do. (c: I spotted it on the OP. I figured it was just a joke, an audiophool send-up. ...'cause that's what trolls do. Not that I really give a **** about your stupid infantile name-calling, but if I'm a troll, why the **** am I telling people to stay the hell out of my thread, and not respond to me? Why did I purposefully ignore some respondents, and killfile others? The fact is, EVERYONE HERE WHO ATTACKED ME IN THIS THREAD IS A TROLL. Including you, jakoff. And if I'm a troll, which I'm not, then what kind of an idiot does that make you, for continuing to contribute to my thread? Getting your daily fix of trolls, you ****ing pathetic newsgroup junkie? Do you realize that its like calling someone a theif after they broke a shop window and looted the place, while you are busy looting the store yourself, or are you just too stupid to realize it? Here, this should prove once and for good whether I'm the troll, or whether your RAT fools are the trolls: ALL YOU OF ****ING IGNORANT REC.AUDIO.TECH TECHNOFOOLS, LISTEN UP!!!!!!! STOP CONTRIBUTING TO THIS THREAD!!!!!!! I'M OFFICIALLY CLOSING IT DOWN NOW!!!!! I'VE ALREADY MADE MY POINT A HUNDRED THOUSAND TIMES OVER, WHICH IS THAT 99.9% OF THE PEOPLE HERE, ARE SCREAMINGLY IGNORANT ****WITS. ****WITS WHO ARE NOT AUDIOPHILES AND KNOW NOTHING RELEVANT ABOUT AUDIO, AND EVEN LESS ABOUT LIFE IN GENERAL. ME AND ALL MY FRIENDS WHO READ YOUR RESPONSES ALL LAUGHED OURSELVES SILLY FOR WEEKS ON END, AND I'M SORRY, WE'RE ALL LAUGHED OUT!!! SO STOP RESPONDING TO ME, GET THE **** OUT OF MY THREAD NOW!!!!!!! If anyone dares to continue this thread, you'll be proving two things: A: I was right about you people being pathetic newsgroup junkies, and everything else I said about you ignorant ****tards not knowing **** all about what you were talking about. B: That YOU are the ones who are the trolls (and the ball-lickers). jak //Walt |
#301
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
What does it take to stop the big troll around here?
|
#302
Posted to rec.audio.tech,alt.usenet.kooks
|
|||
|
|||
What does it take to stop the big troll around here?
|
#303
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
What does it take to stop the big troll around here?
wrote in message
oups.com EVERYONE HERE WHO ATTACKED ME IN THIS THREAD IS A TROLL. Including you, jakoff. And if I'm a troll, which I'm not, then what kind of an idiot does that make you, for continuing to contribute to my thread? Getting your daily fix of trolls, you ****ing pathetic newsgroup junkie? Do you realize that its like calling someone a theif after they broke a shop window and looted the place, while you are busy looting the store yourself, or are you just too stupid to realize it? Here, this should prove once and for good whether I'm the troll, or whether your RAT fools are the trolls: ALL YOU OF ****ING IGNORANT REC.AUDIO.TECH TECHNOFOOLS, LISTEN UP!!!!!!! STOP CONTRIBUTING TO THIS THREAD!!!!!!! I'M OFFICIALLY CLOSING IT DOWN NOW!!!!! I'VE ALREADY MADE MY POINT A HUNDRED THOUSAND TIMES OVER, WHICH IS THAT 99.9% OF THE PEOPLE HERE, ARE SCREAMINGLY IGNORANT ****WITS. ****WITS WHO ARE NOT AUDIOPHILES AND KNOW NOTHING RELEVANT ABOUT AUDIO, AND EVEN LESS ABOUT LIFE IN GENERAL. ME AND ALL MY FRIENDS WHO READ YOUR RESPONSES ALL LAUGHED OURSELVES SILLY FOR WEEKS ON END, AND I'M SORRY, WE'RE ALL LAUGHED OUT!!! SO STOP RESPONDING TO ME, GET THE **** OUT OF MY THREAD NOW!!!!!!! If anyone dares to continue this thread, you'll be proving two things: A: I was right about you people being pathetic newsgroup junkies, and everything else I said about you ignorant ****tards not knowing **** all about what you were talking about. B: That YOU are the ones who are the trolls (and the ball-lickers). IOW, Ladbury lost and knows it. Take all this back-biting as his admission of defeat. |
#304
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
What does it take to stop the big troll around here?
Fat Ass Nazi Krueger wrote these lies: IOW, Ladbury lost and knows it. Take all this back-biting as his admission of defeat. Here you are, trying to bait me, you with 5 million posts to your name, who is THE most hated person on the audio newsgroups, and they call ME the "troll"! And you wonder why I call you and your RAT buddies the most idiotic bunch of ****ing do-nothing goofs that I've ever witnessed in my life. You in particular have made a "career" out of sitting on your fat ****ing lazy nazi ass, pumping out dozens of belligerent lying posts per day on the audio newsgroups for the last 10 years, promoting your insane anti-audio agenda. While actual engineers (as opposed to you, a "wanna-be engineer"), have had successful careers desgining audio equipment. As opposed to just arguing about audio equipment. Now THAT's what I call a "loser". Get it, loser? Might as well add that you never proved a single thing that you ever claimed in this or any other thread, and that I'm the only one that offered factual evidence of my claims, which means that if we go by accepted "norms and standards", and not your ridiculous infantile lies, I won every single argument in this thread, including the fuse "debate". End of story, you can shut your fat arse now and go home. And while you're there, don't forget to jack off to all that child pornography you have on your computer, that you also "claimed" without proof, that your "enemies sent you"...... |
#306
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
What does it take to stop the big troll around here?
Walt's latest waste of bandwidth : I thought this thread was closed and that you weren't going to post any more. When did I say I wasn't going to post any more, troll? I merely said that anyone who responds after I close the thread, is a: TROLL. No news there, since you were the first troll to attack me in this thread. I also said that you can immediately stop bitching about me posting, since you clearly have no life, that you have to keep stalking my ass everywhere I go, you ****ing net kook. Please *do* try to exercise some self control. It would help if you weren't jacking off to girlie magazines while you said that.... We really must set a good example for the children. Newsflash: You and your ignorant technofool buds ARE "the children". |
#307
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
What does it take to stop the big troll around here?
|
#308
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
What does it take to stop the big troll around here?
Walt wrote: wrote: When did I say I wasn't going to post any more, troll? I merely said that anyone who responds after I close the thread, is a: TROLL. C'mon. If I were trolling you I'd be posting brief two- or three- sentence replies to which you'd take umbrage and respond with a barely coherent obscenity laden emotionally volitile kook rant. That's not what's going on, is it? //Walt But you said we were going to go fishin' later, there's a big one out there :-) |
#309
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
What does it take to stop the big troll around here?
|
#310
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
What does it take to stop the big troll around here?
I. Care wrote: In article , says... wrote: When did I say I wasn't going to post any more, troll? I merely said that anyone who responds after I close the thread, is a: TROLL. LOL! What a hoot! The only control you have over this (or any) thread is to keep it going, which is exactly what you are doing! Hmmmmm...What is the definition of "after I close the thread"? -- I. Care Address fake until the SPAM goes away ;-} I'm sure that he'll be telling us, since he knows so much more than any of the other participants in the discussion. He is the sharpest tack in the box, because he tells us, and he's always right. Isn't that obvious? |
#311
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
What does it take to stop the big troll around here?
"Richard Crowley" wrote in message ... wrote: When did I say I wasn't going to post any more, troll? I merely said that anyone who responds after I close the thread, is a: TROLL. LOL! What a hoot! The only control you have over this (or any) thread is to keep it going, which is exactly what you are doing! And if everyone else stopped replying, would he then reply to his own posts, to "keep it going"? MrT. |
#312
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
How safe operating an amp with no fuse?
My very favorite part of this thread comes right at the beginning, when Bob "sparkplug" Ladbury writes: "Do you always talk like this to people in real life, or only when safely ensconced behind a computer? Because if you do, I imagine you have no teeth by now, and its probably hard for you to type anything. " He may not be rich in knowledge about audio, but he sure is a font of *irony*. -- -S "If men were angels, no government would be necessary." - James Madison (1788) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New Orleans Musicians' 'Safe List" | Pro Audio | |||
KISS 112 by Andre Jute | Vacuum Tubes | |||
KISS 113 by Andre Jute | Vacuum Tubes | |||
15 amp fuse with 20 w fuse for wire? | Car Audio | |||
Need Help with Behringer T-1953 | Pro Audio |