"Alex Rodriguez" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

On 6/6/04 1:18 PM, in article ,
"Sounds Good To Me!" wrote:
Mostly "common-man" brands (Pioneer, Sony, Kenwood, Technics, etc) ...
but
some mid-fi and hi-end, too.
Compare the prices at this REAL AUDIO STORE with the ripoff prices posted
by
Ken Drescher (aka drescherdumpster.com).

The few stereo stores that I have seen selling used stuff sell at truly
ridiculous prices. I've seen prices for used stuff that was higher than
new retail price at a discount store. These are the same stores that
usally
want to buy your equipment at the prices BM quotes.
-----------------
Alex

An astute observation.
Brian L. McCarty doesn't "get it" because he is mentally ill.
Brian's object is to harass, not to inform.
I keep wondering about the internals of his mind: Brian, a LIAR, CHEATER,
and FRAUDSTER, niggles honest people about what he himself does.

Brian has certain physical characteristics frequently found among
individuals with Kleinfelter's syndrome
(http://www.geocities.com/WestHollywo.../klinefel.html)
1. High pitched voice.
2. Morbid obesity.
3. Large size.
4. Shyness.
5. Infertility.
6. IQ of 120 or less.

Klinefelter's individuals have an XXY genetic makeup. It is the most common
genetic defect, occuring in 1 in 500 individuals.
Many individuals have a great sense of personal shame, which would explain
Brian's reclusive nature.

Too bad, Brian. Glad it's your body, not mine. I am a long distance runner
and I hike the Grand Canyon.

On Sun, 6 Jun 2004 14:13:40 -0400, "Robert Morein"
wrote:

I am a long distance runner
and I hike the Grand Canyon.


That may be so. But you are no more intelligent than him and maybe
less so. Or maybe it is for problems of emotional origin that causes
you to endlessly answer this troll. You feed his supposed mental
illness with yours. Get smart, ignore him. Unless you can't. You
portray yourself as intelligent but you exhibit none of that here. You
more than anyone else has ruined this newsgroup.

If McCarty and Morein would dissapear this group would be MUCH better
off.

Jeffrey "Abbedd" Powell Dsn/Mfg Eng

ansermetniac a écrit :

You more than anyone else has ruined this newsgroup.

Is this NG ruined ?

"Lionel" wrote in message
...
ansermetniac a écrit :

You more than anyone else has ruined this newsgroup.

Is this NG ruined ?

I believe it's in fine working order.

On Sun, 6 Jun 2004 15:11:57 -0400, "Robert Morein"
wrote:


"Lionel" wrote in message
...
ansermetniac a écrit :

You more than anyone else has ruined this newsgroup.

Is this NG ruined ?

I believe it's in fine working order.


Half the psots are by MCcarty and the other half a response by Morein.
And where is Orion to stop the moron. No wonder they are considered a
joke

Abbedd

"ansermetniac" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 6 Jun 2004 14:13:40 -0400, "Robert Morein"
wrote:

I am a long distance runner
and I hike the Grand Canyon.


That may be so. But you are no more intelligent than him and maybe
less so.

Jeffrey, you're not a good judge.
Brian is not a troll. See
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&l...q=define:troll
A troll intends to stir up argument.
Brian's goal is to destroy or damage legitimate resellers on
rec.audio.marketplace.
A Google Groups search for your posts, Jeff, can be viewed he
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe...niac&lr=&hl=en

It shows that you have offered exactly one item for sale on
rec.audio.marketplace, a Marantz CD63SE
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=gr....co m&rnum=10

in which you neatly sidestepped McCarty's harassment by saying "email with
offers."

Or maybe it is for problems of emotional origin that causes
you to endlessly answer this troll.

It is you who are blind, Jeff, because you show absolutely no empathy with
the plight of sellers who are unfairly victimized by McCarty.
Perhaps you hate sellers too, and are a secret McCarty sympathizer.

On Sun, 6 Jun 2004 16:35:42 -0400, "Robert Morein"
wrote:


"ansermetniac" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 6 Jun 2004 14:13:40 -0400, "Robert Morein"
wrote:

I am a long distance runner
and I hike the Grand Canyon.


That may be so. But you are no more intelligent than him and maybe
less so.

Jeffrey, you're not a good judge.
Brian is not a troll. See
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&l...q=define:troll
A troll intends to stir up argument.
Brian's goal is to destroy or damage legitimate resellers on
rec.audio.marketplace.
A Google Groups search for your posts, Jeff, can be viewed he
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe...niac&lr=&hl=en

It shows that you have offered exactly one item for sale on
rec.audio.marketplace, a Marantz CD63SE
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=gr....co m&rnum=10

in which you neatly sidestepped McCarty's harassment by saying "email with
offers."

Or maybe it is for problems of emotional origin that causes
you to endlessly answer this troll.

It is you who are blind, Jeff, because you show absolutely no empathy with
the plight of sellers who are unfairly victimized by McCarty.
Perhaps you hate sellers too, and are a secret McCarty sympathizer.



Ignore the asshole instead of fueling him. Be smart. Don't be like
him.

Abbedd

"ansermetniac" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 6 Jun 2004 16:35:42 -0400, "Robert Morein"
wrote:


"ansermetniac" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 6 Jun 2004 14:13:40 -0400, "Robert Morein"
wrote:

I am a long distance runner
and I hike the Grand Canyon.


That may be so. But you are no more intelligent than him and maybe
less so.

Jeffrey, you're not a good judge.
Brian is not a troll. See
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&l...q=define:troll
A troll intends to stir up argument.
Brian's goal is to destroy or damage legitimate resellers on
rec.audio.marketplace.
A Google Groups search for your posts, Jeff, can be viewed he

http://groups.google.com/groups?safe...p=rec.audio.ma
rketplace&as_uauthors=ansermetniac&lr=&hl=en

It shows that you have offered exactly one item for sale on
rec.audio.marketplace, a Marantz CD63SE

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=gr...+author:anserm
etniac&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=4bsf309ls9emkmn898fmojdmgq44f22u3j%404ax.co m&
rnum=10

in which you neatly sidestepped McCarty's harassment by saying "email
with
offers."

Or maybe it is for problems of emotional origin that causes
you to endlessly answer this troll.

It is you who are blind, Jeff, because you show absolutely no empathy
with
the plight of sellers who are unfairly victimized by McCarty.
Perhaps you hate sellers too, and are a secret McCarty sympathizer.



Ignore the asshole instead of fueling him. Be smart. Don't be like
him.

Abbedd

Why don't you use a killfile so you don't see either of us?

Robert Morein wrote:


IMHO McCarty is far more damaging.

That's a lie, Morein. You don't have any humble opinions - arrogance has
been the rule with you, and its even been your well-documented professional
downfall.

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
Robert Morein wrote:


IMHO McCarty is far more damaging.

That's a lie, Morein. You don't have any humble opinions - arrogance has
been the rule with you, and its even been your well-documented
professional
downfall.

Are you saying that Krueger is more damaging than McCarty?

It's a binary choice, Arny.

Robert Morein wrote:
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
Robert Morein wrote:


IMHO McCarty is far more damaging.

That's a lie, Morein. You don't have any humble opinions - arrogance
has been the rule with you, and its even been your well-documented
professional downfall.

Are you saying that Krueger is more damaging than McCarty?

Not at all, but it seems that without help a blinkered mind yours won't be
able to figure it out.

It's a binary choice, Arny.

No it isn't. Part of your lie is the two choices that you presented.

Arny said:

Robert Morein wrote:


IMHO McCarty is far more damaging.

That's a lie, Morein. You don't have any humble opinions - arrogance has
been the rule with you, and its even been your well-documented professional
downfall.

The H usually stands for honest. That's probably why you missed it, ****head.

Boon

On 7/6/04 8:22, in article , "Arny
Krueger" wrote:


That's a lie, Morein. You don't have any humble opinions - arrogance has
been the rule with you, and its even been your well-documented professional
downfall.

Not meaning to split hairs, but wouldn't a "professional downfall" actual
imply that a person HAD a profession? My son Bob has never worked a day in
his life, so I am utterly confused by your ascribing a "professional" status
to him.

Dr. Sylvan Morein, DDS




PROVEN PUBLISHED FACTS about my Son, Robert Morein
--

Bob Morein History
--
http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/mld/l...ws/4853918.htm

Doctoral student takes intellectual property case to Supreme Court
By L. STUART DITZEN
Philadelphia Inquirer

PHILADELPHIA -Even the professors who dismissed him from a doctoral program
at Drexel University agreed that Robert Morein was uncommonly smart.

They apparently didn't realize that he was uncommonly stubborn too - so much
so that he would mount a court fight all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court
to challenge his dismissal.

The Supremes have already rejected this appeal, btw.

"It's a personality trait I have - I'm a tenacious guy," said Morein, a
pleasantly eccentric man regarded by friends as an inventive genius. "And we
do come to a larger issue here."

An "inventive genius" that has never invented anything. And hardly
"pleasantly" eccentric.

A five-year legal battle between this unusual ex-student and one of
Philadelphia's premier educational institutions has gone largely unnoticed
by the media and the public.

Because no one gives a **** about a 50 year old loser.

But it has been the subject of much attention in academia.

Drexel says it dismissed Morein in 1995 because he failed, after eight
years, to complete a thesis required for a doctorate in electrical and
computer engineering.

Not to mention the 12 years it took him to get thru high school!
BWAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!


Morein, 50, of Dresher, Pa., contends that he was dismissed only after his
thesis adviser "appropriated" an innovative idea Morein had developed in a
rarefied area of thought called "estimation theory" and arranged to have it
patented.

A contention rejected by three courts. From a 50 YEAR OLD that has
done NOTHING PRODUCTIVE with his life.


In February 2000, Philadelphia Common Pleas Court Judge Esther R. Sylvester
ruled that Morein's adviser indeed had taken his idea.

An idea that was worth nothing, because it didn't work. Just like
Robert Morein, who has never worked a day in his life.


Sylvester held that Morein had been unjustly dismissed and she ordered
Drexel to reinstate him or refund his tuition.

Funnily enough, Drexel AGREED to reinstate Morein, who rejected the
offer because he knew he was and IS a failed loser. Spending daddy's
money to cover up his lack of productivity.

That brought roars of protest from the lions of academia. There is a long
tradition in America of noninterference by the courts in academic decisions.

Backed by every major university in Pennsylvania and organizations
representing thousands of others around the country, Drexel appealed to the
state Superior Court.

The appellate court, by a 2-1 vote, reversed Sylvester in June 2001 and
restored the status quo. Morein was, once again, out at Drexel. And the
time-honored axiom that courts ought to keep their noses out of academic
affairs was reasserted.

The state Supreme Court declined to review the case and, in an ordinary
litigation, that would have been the end of it.

But Morein, in a quixotic gesture that goes steeply against the odds, has
asked the highest court in the land to give him a hearing.

Daddy throws more money down the crapper.

His attorney, Faye Riva Cohen, said the Supreme Court appeal is important
even if it fails because it raises the issue of whether a university has a
right to lay claim to a student's ideas - or intellectual property - without
compensation.

"Any time you are in a Ph.D. program, you are a serf, you are a slave," said
Cohen. Morein "is concerned not only for himself. He feels that what
happened to him is pretty common."

It's called HIGHER EDUCATION, honey. The students aren't in charge,
the UNIVERSITY and PROFESSORS are.


Drexel's attorney, Neil J. Hamburg, called Morein's appeal - and his claim
that his idea was stolen - "preposterous."

"I will eat my shoe if the Supreme Court hears this case," declared Hamburg.
"We're not even going to file a response. He is a brilliant guy, but his
intelligence should be used for the advancement of society rather than
pursuing self-destructive litigation."

No **** sherlock.

The litigation began in 1997, when Morein sued Drexel claiming that a
committee of professors had dumped him after he accused his faculty adviser,
Paul Kalata, of appropriating his idea.

His concept was considered to have potential value for businesses in
minutely measuring the internal functions of machines, industrial processes
and electronic systems.

The field of "estimation theory" is one in which scientists attempt to
calculate what they cannot plainly observe, such as the inside workings of a
nuclear plant or a computer.

My estimation theory? There is NO brain at work inside the head of
Robert Morein, only sawdust.


Prior to Morein's dismissal, Drexel looked into his complaint against Kalata
and concluded that the associate professor had done nothing wrong. Kalata,
through a university lawyer, declined to comment.

At a nonjury trial before Sylvester in 1999, Morein testified that Kalata in
1990 had posed a technical problem for him to study for his thesis. It
related to estimation theory.

Kalata, who did not appear at the trial, said in a 1998 deposition that a
Cherry Hill company for which he was a paid consultant, K-Tron
International, had asked him to develop an alternate estimation method for
it. The company manufactures bulk material feeders and conveyors used in
industrial processes.

Morein testified that, after much study, he experienced "a flash of
inspiration" and came up with a novel mathematical concept to address the
problem Kalata had presented.

Without his knowledge, Morein said, Kalata shared the idea with K-Tron.

K-Tron then applied for a patent, listing Kalata and Morein as co-inventors.

Morein said he agreed "under duress" to the arrangement, but felt "locked
into a highly disadvantageous situation." As a result, he testified, he
became alienated from Kalata.

As events unfolded, Kalata signed over his interest in the patent to K-Tron.
The company never capitalized on the technology and eventually allowed the
patent to lapse. No one made any money from it.

Because it was bogus. Even Kalata was mortified that he was a victim
of this SCAMSTER, Robert Morein.

In 1991, Morein went to the head of Drexel's electrical engineering
department, accused Kalata of appropriating his intellectual property, and
asked for a new faculty adviser.

The staff at Drexel laughed wildly at the ignorance of Robert Morein.

He didn't get one. Instead, a committee of four professors, including
Kalata, was formed to oversee Morein's thesis work.

Four years later, the committee dismissed him, saying he had failed to
complete his thesis.

So Morein ****s up his first couple years, gets new faculty advisers
(a TEAM), and then ****s up again! Brilliant!


Morein claimed that the committee intentionally had undermined him.

Morein makes LOTS of claims that are nonsense. One look thru the
usenet proves it.


Judge Sylvester agreed. In her ruling, Sylvester wrote: "It is this court's
opinion that the defendants were motivated by bad faith and ill will."

So much for political machine judges.

The U.S. Supreme Court receives 7,000 appeals a year and agrees to hear only
about 100 of them.

Hamburg, Drexel's attorney, is betting the high court will reject Morein's
appeal out of hand because its focal point - concerning a student's right to
intellectual property - was not central to the litigation in the
Pennsylvania courts.

Morein said he understands it's a long shot, but he feels he must pursue it.

Just like all the failed "causes" Morein pursues. Heck, he's been
chasing another "Brian McCarty" for years and yet has ZERO impact on
anything.

Failure. Look it up in Websters. You'll see a picture of Robert
Morein. The poster boy for SCAMMING LOSERS.


"I had to seek closure," he said.

Without a doctorate, he said, he has been unable to pursue a career he had
hoped would lead him into research on artificial intelligence.

Who better to tell us about "artificial intelligence".
BWAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!


As it is, Morein lives at home with his father and makes a modest income
from stock investments. He has written a film script that he is trying to
make into a movie. And in the basement of his father's home he is working on
an invention, an industrial pump so powerful it could cut steel with a
bulletlike stream of water.


FAILED STUDENT
FAILED MOVIE MAKER
FAILED SCREENWRITER
FAILED INVESTOR
FAILED DRIVER
FAILED SON
FAILED PARENTS
FAILED INVENTOR
FAILED PLAINTIFF
FAILED HOMOSEXUAL
FAILED HUMAN
FAILED
FAILED

But none of it is what he had imagined for himself.

"I don't really have a replacement career," Morein said. "It's a very
gnawing thing."

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
news
Robert Morein wrote:
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
Robert Morein wrote:


IMHO McCarty is far more damaging.

That's a lie, Morein. You don't have any humble opinions - arrogance
has been the rule with you, and its even been your well-documented
professional downfall.

Are you saying that Krueger is more damaging than McCarty?

Not at all, but it seems that without help a blinkered mind yours won't be
able to figure it out.

It's a binary choice, Arny.

No it isn't. Part of your lie is the two choices that you presented.

Arny, you said, "That's a lie."
One have thought you would be an expert on the subject of lying, with all
your experience, but perhaps not.
I assumed that you were referring to the major premise, which is that
McCarty is more damaging than you.
However, you are welcome to clarify your comment.

As for your own humility, you should be aware that while you may believe
that it's possible to be infallible and humble at the same time, other
people don't share your belief.

Paul Dormer wrote:
"Arny Krueger" emitted :

IMHO McCarty is far more damaging.

That's a lie, Morein. You don't have any humble opinions -
arrogance has been the rule with you, and its even been your
well-documented professional downfall.

Are you saying that Krueger is more damaging than McCarty?

Not at all, but it seems that without help a blinkered mind yours
won't be able to figure it out.

It's a binary choice, Arny.

No it isn't. Part of your lie is the two choices that you presented.

You've already admitted to being a damaging influence on RAO, putz.
It's even documented on The Tape.

Prove it, Dormer. I think the tape is just another figment of your
imagination.

Robert Morein wrote:
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
news
Robert Morein wrote:
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
Robert Morein wrote:


IMHO McCarty is far more damaging.

That's a lie, Morein. You don't have any humble opinions -
arrogance has been the rule with you, and its even been your
well-documented professional downfall.

Are you saying that Krueger is more damaging than McCarty?

Not at all, but it seems that without help a blinkered mind yours
won't be able to figure it out.

It's a binary choice, Arny.

No it isn't. Part of your lie is the two choices that you presented.

Arny, you said, "That's a lie."
One have thought you would be an expert on the subject of lying, with
all your experience, but perhaps not.
I assumed that you were referring to the major premise, which is that
McCarty is more damaging than you.
However, you are welcome to clarify your comment.

As for your own humility, you should be aware that while you may
believe that it's possible to be infallible and humble at the same
time, other people don't share your belief.

I've already explained to you once, Morien. It's obviously way over your
head. You education isn't my job. If Drexel University and the United States
Supreme Court can't fix you, far be it from me to even try.

Arny said:

Prove it, Dormer. I think the tape is just another figment of your
imagination.

Yeah, it's a figment of everyone's imagination. All the people here who've
heard it...they were imagining it the whole time. Some sort of Internet mind
control, I'll bet.

****head.

Boon

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
news
Robert Morein wrote:
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
news
Robert Morein wrote:
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
Robert Morein wrote:


IMHO McCarty is far more damaging.

That's a lie, Morein. You don't have any humble opinions -
arrogance has been the rule with you, and its even been your
well-documented professional downfall.

Are you saying that Krueger is more damaging than McCarty?

Not at all, but it seems that without help a blinkered mind yours
won't be able to figure it out.

It's a binary choice, Arny.

No it isn't. Part of your lie is the two choices that you presented.

Arny, you said, "That's a lie."
One have thought you would be an expert on the subject of lying, with
all your experience, but perhaps not.
I assumed that you were referring to the major premise, which is that
McCarty is more damaging than you.
However, you are welcome to clarify your comment.

As for your own humility, you should be aware that while you may
believe that it's possible to be infallible and humble at the same
time, other people don't share your belief.

I've already explained to you once, Morien.

You've explained how one can be infallible and humble at the same time?
Pray tell, I'm all ears.

It's obviously way over your
head. You education isn't my job. If Drexel University and the United
States
Supreme Court can't fix you, far be it from me to even try.

"Morien" responds to "Kreuger" [sic]
I'm sorry, Arny, but you never did explain the issue.
BTW, I have an MS in Physics. That makes me educationally superior to you.

"ansermetniac" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 6 Jun 2004 15:11:57 -0400, "Robert Morein"
wrote:


"Lionel" wrote in message
...
ansermetniac a écrit :

You more than anyone else has ruined this newsgroup.

Is this NG ruined ?

I believe it's in fine working order.


Half the psots are by MCcarty and the other half a response by Morein.
And where is Orion to stop the moron. No wonder they are considered a
joke

Abbedd

Abbedd, if McCarty is considered a joke, I'm happy to hear it.
As for whether my posts are considered a joke, it doesn't concern me to hear
it.

"Paul Dormer" wrote in message
...
"Robert Morein" emitted :

BTW, I have an MS in Physics. That makes me educationally superior to
you.

You are superior to Krueger? Therefore you are a sockpuppet.


--
S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t

I'm just pulling his chain.
I don't believe that education makes anybody superior to anybody else.

On Sun, 6 Jun 2004 19:42:27 -0400, "Robert Morein"
wrote:

BTW, I have an MS in Physics. That makes me educationally superior to you.

What have you done in the real world?

abbedd

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
Arny said:

Prove it, Dormer. I think the tape is just another figment of your
imagination.

Yeah, it's a figment of everyone's imagination. All the people here
who've
heard it...they were imagining it the whole time. Some sort of Internet
mind
control, I'll bet.

****head.

Boon

It's not in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth
Edition (DSM-IV) http://allpsych.com/disorders/dsm.html ,

but it is descriptive.
However, that, and Narcissistic Personality Disorder
http://allpsych.com/disorders/person...arcissism.html , appear to play
a role.

Hence, we have the syndrome, "****head with Borderline Personality
Disorder."

In the case of McCarty, Schizoaffective Disorder,
http://allpsych.com/disorders/psycho...affective.html, and Antisocial
Personality Disorder,
http://allpsych.com/disorders/person...ntisocial.html , play a major
role.

You people are missing the point of my posting for quality stereo gear at a
reasonable price .. LOL ... how does this get so OFF TOPIC?!?! But it's fun
reading!!!

Gary
http://home.houston.rr.com/soundsgoodtome


"Robert Morein" wrote in message
...

"ansermetniac" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 6 Jun 2004 16:35:42 -0400, "Robert Morein"
wrote:


"ansermetniac" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 6 Jun 2004 14:13:40 -0400, "Robert Morein"
wrote:

I am a long distance runner
and I hike the Grand Canyon.


That may be so. But you are no more intelligent than him and maybe
less so.

Jeffrey, you're not a good judge.
Brian is not a troll. See

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&l...q=define:troll
A troll intends to stir up argument.
Brian's goal is to destroy or damage legitimate resellers on
rec.audio.marketplace.
A Google Groups search for your posts, Jeff, can be viewed he


http://groups.google.com/groups?safe...p=rec.audio.ma
rketplace&as_uauthors=ansermetniac&lr=&hl=en

It shows that you have offered exactly one item for sale on
rec.audio.marketplace, a Marantz CD63SE


http://groups.google.com/groups?q=gr...+author:anserm

etniac&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=4bsf309ls9emkmn898fmojdmgq44f22u3j%404ax.co m&
rnum=10

in which you neatly sidestepped McCarty's harassment by saying "email
with
offers."

Or maybe it is for problems of emotional origin that causes
you to endlessly answer this troll.

It is you who are blind, Jeff, because you show absolutely no empathy
with
the plight of sellers who are unfairly victimized by McCarty.
Perhaps you hate sellers too, and are a secret McCarty sympathizer.



Ignore the asshole instead of fueling him. Be smart. Don't be like
him.

Abbedd

Why don't you use a killfile so you don't see either of us?

Robert Morein wrote:
"Lionel" wrote in message
...
ansermetniac a écrit :

You more than anyone else has ruined this newsgroup.

Is this NG ruined ?

I believe it's in fine working order.

If we were looking for signs of some kind of mental problem, claiming this
NG is "in fine working order" would have to be one of them.

Marc Phillips wrote:
Arny said:

Prove it, Dormer. I think the tape is just another figment of your
imagination.

Yeah, it's a figment of everyone's imagination. All the people here
who've heard it...they were imagining it the whole time. Some sort
of Internet mind control, I'll bet.

If its so real why haven't I heard it?

****head.

Phillips, Exactly how big of an ejaculation do you have every time you post
this word or the word "pedophile"?

Arny said:

Marc Phillips wrote:
Arny said:

Prove it, Dormer. I think the tape is just another figment of your
imagination.

Yeah, it's a figment of everyone's imagination. All the people here
who've heard it...they were imagining it the whole time. Some sort
of Internet mind control, I'll bet.

If its so real why haven't I heard it?

****head.

Phillips, Exactly how big of an ejaculation do you have every time you post
this word or the word "pedophile"?









Marc Phillips wrote:
Arny said:

Prove it, Dormer. I think the tape is just another figment of your
imagination.

Yeah, it's a figment of everyone's imagination. All the people here
who've heard it...they were imagining it the whole time. Some sort
of Internet mind control, I'll bet.

If its so real why haven't I heard it?

Because the joke is on you.

****head.

Phillips, Exactly how big of an ejaculation do you have every time you post
this word or the word "pedophile"?

Is this another one of your sick fantasies? Keep it to yourself.

Boon