Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Any experiences with Earthworks SR20, Neumann KMS 104, or Sennheiser MD 431 II
Looking to add a pair of handheld microphones for EFP
and interview work. I'm most interested in increasing transient response and micro detail in the drama of the spoken word. Considering these three potentials so far. Sennheiser MD 431 II Neumann KMS 104 Earthworks SR20 Any hands-on experiences? |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Any experiences with Earthworks SR20, Neumann KMS 104, orSennheiser MD 431 II
On Dec 12, 3:37*pm, "Powell" wrote:
Looking to add a pair of handheld microphones for EFP and interview work. I'm most interested in increasing transient response and micro detail in the drama of the spoken word. * Considering these three potentials so far. Sennheiser MD 431 II Neumann KMS 104 Earthworks SR20 Any hands-on experiences? Most interview mics I see are omni-directional dynamics, like the Electro-Voice 635A or RE 50. I'm not familiar with the Earthworks model you mention, but the other two mics are uni-directional. -Neb |
#3
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Any experiences with Earthworks SR20, Neumann KMS 104, orSennheiser MD 431 II
On Dec 12, 3:37*pm, "Powell" wrote:
Looking to add a pair of handheld microphones for EFP and interview work. I'm most interested in increasing transient response and micro detail in the drama of the spoken word. What does transient response have to do with spoken word ? And what does "micro detail in the drama" mean ? Considering these three potentials so far. Sennheiser MD 431 II Neumann KMS 104 Earthworks SR20 Any hands-on experiences? I use the (original) 431 for singers on stage. What makes it a great vocal mic is a liability for interview. It's got quite a tight pattern. Of the 3 the SR20 has the widest pattern, but you really should be trying out omnis. What are you using now ? rd |
#4
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Any experiences with Earthworks SR20, Neumann KMS 104, or Sennheiser MD 431 II
"RD Jones" wrote Looking to add a pair of handheld microphones for EFP and interview work. I'm most interested in increasing transient response and micro detail in the drama of the spoken word. What does transient response have to do with spoken word ? And what does "micro detail in the drama" mean ? Want a more seamless integration between the audio quality (signature) from studio microphones and takes from handheld field recording. When doing video editing for DVD, TV, or even radio ads the audio splices are too discontinuous for my ear when alternating between a studio track and a field track. And this manifests itself mostly in the transient response and micro detail of the sound recording. Considering these three potentials so far. Sennheiser MD 431 II Neumann KMS 104 Earthworks SR20 Any hands-on experiences? I use the (original) 431 for singers on stage. What makes it a great vocal mic is a liability for interview. It's got quite a tight pattern. "tight pattern"... I don't see that as a limitation as long as the polar pattern isn't hypercardioid. These are largely staged recordings (as many takes as needed) not ENG. Of the 3 the SR20 has the widest pattern, but you really should be trying out omnis. Why? Even unprofessional talent can be tutored to use a handheld microphone in short order. Not that I've not been burned. What are you using now ? For handheld applications using EV 635A and Shure SM63. The 635, for example, does not match well with a Shure KSM 27/32. Many times I've used only 27's for studio and the field (XY) sections with good integrated results. Obviously it's not appropriate for many of the indoor field recordings. |
#5
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Any experiences with Earthworks SR20, Neumann KMS 104, orSennheiser MD 431 II
RD Jones wrote:
On Dec 12, 3:37=A0pm, "Powell" wrote: Looking to add a pair of handheld microphones for EFP and interview work. I'm most interested in increasing transient response and micro detail in the drama of the spoken word. What does transient response have to do with spoken word ? And what does "micro detail in the drama" mean ? I think he's looking for something with an exaggerated top end that will be super-bright. Considering these three potentials so far. Sennheiser MD 431 II Neumann KMS 104 Earthworks SR20 Any hands-on experiences? I use the (original) 431 for singers on stage. What makes it a great vocal mic is a liability for interview. It's got quite a tight pattern. Yes, and that goes double with the KMS104 which is very tight. However.... if you want it to sound peaky and bright like a U87, the KMS104 will do that, the MD 431 will not. Top end on the MD 431 is actually very mellow. The SR20 is extended but not super bright. Of the 3 the SR20 has the widest pattern, but you really should be trying out omnis. I would agree. If you want a bright interview mike, the Beyer MCE58 is designed for that. It's not as peaky as the KMS104, but it's got a lot of top end to it, it's omnidirectional and well-controlled in wind. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#6
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Any experiences with Earthworks SR20, Neumann KMS 104, orSennheiser MD 431 II
On Dec 13, 11:04*am, "Powell" wrote:
Want a more seamless integration between the audio quality (signature) from studio microphones and takes from handheld field recording. *When doing video editing for DVD, TV, or even radio ads the audio splices are too discontinuous for my ear when alternating between a studio track and a field track. And this manifests itself mostly in the transient response and micro detail of the sound recording. I'd still say EV RE50 omni - or the Beyer MCE58 - or maybe omni lavs like MKE102's with Micro Cat fuzzy's or under the talent's shirt wrapped in moleskin.... Because omnis are far less sensitive to wind and handling noise, and because you need to hear people being interviewed even when your talent fails to point the mic at the subject, and because for field work people are well conditioned to hearing that sound. Unless you live in Europe, where they use shotguns at a distance for field work a lot. And it isn't nearly as good sounding, really. Why? *Even unprofessional talent can be tutored to use a handheld microphone in short order. Not that I've not been burned. Even Professional talent will burn you enough that you really might not want to be responsible for trying to reinvent the wheel. It will fall on your head, not the talent's if the Director and Producers hate it, or worse if you end up with unusable tracks on a critical interview. When you try non-industry standard methods, you expose yourself to greater professional liability than if you follow established models. However if you have the budget and the go ahead to experiment, then good on you. But I would try to post the tracks if you want them to match better, and if that's not enough maybe track lavaliers on the studio side so you had omnis all around. Will Miho NY TV/Music/Audio Post/Live Sound Guy "The large print giveth and the small print taketh away..." Tom Waits |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|