Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Chinese? ribbon mics?
Anybody try these? http://www.shinybox.com/index.php (click on condenser
mikes.) Whether you have or not, I have afew questions that may relate to ribbons in general. 1. A load of 1000 ohms is recommended. Can I obtain this simply by paralleling the pre's input with a 1000 ohm resistor? 2. No load capacitance is specified. ??? Wouldn't it be critical to this dynamical system? 3. Shiny Box offers installation of a transformer in the mic body, as a rather expensive mod, which allegedly smooths the frequency response. Is there a generic rationale for this, or just something funny he's pulling with these mics? I don't see how it would be productive to change the output impedance. 4. The "46" has a smaller body than a "23", and allegedly extended frequency response, with less proximity effect. a. Is there a generic fact about the size of ribbon mic bodies that applies here? b. I assume that with a transducer as delicate as a ribbon, this type of mic is best used for distance miking. Wouldn't it be crazy to risk use of one at a distance where the proximity effect is active? 5. As passive devices with large surface transducers, the self noise is probably not significant. However, the low output does emphasize pre noise. In use, how do ribbons compare to condensers as far as noise measured at the pre out:? 6. Is there a criticality to construction of ribbons, exceeding that of German condenser knockoffs, that limits how good they can be for $150 ? TIA, Bob Morein |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Chinese? ribbon mics?
"soundhaspriority" wrote in message ... [snip] I've answered this one: 5. As passive devices with large surface transducers, the self noise is probably not significant. However, the low output does emphasize pre noise. In use, how do ribbons compare to condensers as far as noise measured at the pre out:? I have done a little Googling, and learned that self noise is a problem. |
#3
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Chinese? ribbon mics?
|
#4
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Chinese? ribbon mics?
On Thu, 11 May 2006 04:22:44 -0400, "soundhaspriority"
wrote: "soundhaspriority" wrote in message m... [snip] I've answered this one: 5. As passive devices with large surface transducers, the self noise is probably not significant. However, the low output does emphasize pre noise. In use, how do ribbons compare to condensers as far as noise measured at the pre out:? I have done a little Googling, and learned that self noise is a problem. Any info on the mechanism that generates it? It is hard to see how it could be that far above thermal noise given what is in it. d -- Pearce Consulting http://www.pearce.uk.com |
#5
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Chinese? ribbon mics?
"soundhaspriority" 1. A load of 1000 ohms is recommended. ** Same as for any 200 ohm mic. 2. No load capacitance is specified. ??? ** No need to. Same as for any 200 ohm mic. 3. Shiny Box offers installation of a transformer in the mic body, as a rather expensive mod, which allegedly smooths the frequency response. ** There is a no-name tranny in their already. They offer two up grades, the C and L models. 4. The "46" has a smaller body than a "23", and allegedly extended frequency response, with less proximity effect. a. Is there a generic fact about the size of ribbon mic bodies that applies here? b. I assume that with a transducer as delicate as a ribbon, this type of mic is best used for distance miking. Wouldn't it be crazy to risk use of one at a distance where the proximity effect is active? ** Hand held vocal mics have been made by Beyer using ribbons. The spec on that site for 165 dB SPL is absurd. 5. As passive devices with large surface transducers, the self noise is probably not significant. ** Can be - ribbons are typically low output mics. 6. Is there a criticality to construction of ribbons, Of course. ......... Phil |
#6
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Chinese? ribbon mics?
"Don Pearce" wrote in message ... On Thu, 11 May 2006 04:22:44 -0400, "soundhaspriority" wrote: "soundhaspriority" wrote in message om... [snip] I've answered this one: 5. As passive devices with large surface transducers, the self noise is probably not significant. However, the low output does emphasize pre noise. In use, how do ribbons compare to condensers as far as noise measured at the pre out:? I have done a little Googling, and learned that self noise is a problem. Any info on the mechanism that generates it? It is hard to see how it could be that far above thermal noise given what is in it. I believe the given mechanism is thermal, elevated by the extremely high gain to line level. |
#7
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Chinese? ribbon mics?
All I can say is I heard a 23 up against a AT3035 and AT4033
for female vox and I thought the singer sounded more "on mic" from about 2' off the 23 than she did singing a lot closer to the AT mikes. On the 23 she sounded more natural and intimate, too. The ATs gave a more processed sound. After hearing the comparison, I want to get a chinese ribbon. Yeah, the chinese ones I'm sure aren't as good as the more expensive ribbons, but I guess they still have the ribbon character. The way I'd compare what I heard is the ATs sounded like for use with pop music and the ribbon sounded like something for blues or jazz. |
#8
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Chinese? ribbon mics?
"soundhaspriority" wrote in message
Anybody try these? http://www.shinybox.com/index.php (click on condenser mikes.) Whether you have or not, I have afew questions that may relate to ribbons in general. 1. A load of 1000 ohms is recommended. Can I obtain this simply by paralleling the pre's input with a 1000 ohm resistor? Yes. The easiest way to do this involves a soldering iron and a few mods to a Hosa polarity inverter adaptor. Basically, you rewire the jumpers between pins 2 & 3 so that the inversion is gone, and then solder the 1K resistor between pins 2 and 3. I mention the Hosa polarity inverter because its far easier to find than the Switchcraft M/F empty shell adaptor. 2. No load capacitance is specified. ??? Wouldn't it be critical to this dynamical system? Capacitance is only significant when its impedance within the audible range is less than 10 times any parallel resistance. Three relevant resistances are 13K (the approximate maximum input impedance of a mic pre with phantom power), 2 K (the approximate input impedance of many mic preamps, and 600 ohms. I did a little spread sheet and came up with the following capacitances for 20 KHz and the three resistances: 600 ohms 0.066314561 uF 2,000 ohms 0.019894368 uF 13,000 ohms 0.003060672 uF The capacitance for the highest resistance is equivalent to a mic cable about 100 foot long. 3. Shiny Box offers installation of a transformer in the mic body, as a rather expensive mod, which allegedly smooths the frequency response. Is there a generic rationale for this, or just something funny he's pulling with these mics? I don't see how it would be productive to change the output impedance. Most ribbon mics have built-in step-up transformers because a ribbon mic is usually a very low-Z, low output device. I'm going to take a wild guess and speculate that the three options net out to be: Standard model mic - Chinese generic matching transformer "C" model mic - Cinemag matching transformer "L" model mic - Lundahl matching transformer conspiciously missing is the "J" model. 4. The "46" has a smaller body than a "23", and allegedly extended frequency response, with less proximity effect. a. Is there a generic fact about the size of ribbon mic bodies that applies here? I suspect the body was lengthened to house a longer ribbon. b. I assume that with a transducer as delicate as a ribbon, this type of mic is best used for distance miking. Wouldn't it be crazy to risk use of one at a distance where the proximity effect is active? Ever hear of external pop filters? ;-) 5. As passive devices with large surface transducers, the self noise is probably not significant. However, the low output does emphasize pre noise. In use, how do ribbons compare to condensers as far as noise measured at the pre out:? Depends on the matching transformer. Generally, ribbon mics have at least as low output as regular dynamic, which in turn generally have low output compared to condensor mics. 6. Is there a criticality to construction of ribbons, exceeding that of German condenser knockoffs, that limits how good they can be for $150 ? Yup. |
#9
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Chinese? ribbon mics?
Arny Krueger wrote: "soundhaspriority" wrote in message Anybody try these? http://www.shinybox.com/index.php (click on condenser mikes.) Whether you have or not, I have afew questions that may relate to ribbons in general. 1. A load of 1000 ohms is recommended. Can I obtain this simply by paralleling the pre's input with a 1000 ohm resistor? Yes. The easiest way to do this involves a soldering iron and a few mods to a Hosa polarity inverter adaptor. Basically, you rewire the jumpers between pins 2 & 3 so that the inversion is gone, and then solder the 1K resistor between pins 2 and 3. I mention the Hosa polarity inverter because its far easier to find than the Switchcraft M/F empty shell adaptor. Most of the mic inputs I'm familiar with already have an input Z of about 2k ohms. Probably close enough for this mic in practice but if you want to do something like that, then make the resistor also equal to 2k to make it 1k overall. Graham |
#10
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Chinese? ribbon mics?
"Arny Krueger" Capacitance is only significant when its impedance within the audible range is less than 10 times any parallel resistance. Three relevant resistances are 13K (the approximate maximum input impedance of a mic pre with phantom power), 2 K (the approximate input impedance of many mic preamps, and 600 ohms. I did a little spread sheet and came up with the following capacitances for 20 KHz and the three resistances: 600 ohms 0.066314561 uF 2,000 ohms 0.019894368 uF 13,000 ohms 0.003060672 uF ** All WILDLY wrong numbers !! The "correct" values a 1320 pF, 390 pF and 60 pF. C = 1 / ( 2. pi. F. R ) The capacitance for the highest resistance is equivalent to a mic cable about 100 foot long. ** Nope - about 1 foot long. A totally silly and pointless calc. Arny's premise is false - again. Yawnnnn ...... ......... Phil |
#11
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Chinese? ribbon mics?
I did a little spread sheet and came up with the following
capacitances for 20 KHz and the three resistances: 600 ohms 0.066314561 uF 2,000 ohms 0.019894368 uF 13,000 ohms 0.003060672 uF Arny, why didn't you round off these values? |
#12
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Chinese? ribbon mics?
"William Sommer******" I did a little spread sheet and came up with the following capacitances for 20 KHz and the three resistances: 600 ohms 0.066314561 uF 2,000 ohms 0.019894368 uF 13,000 ohms 0.003060672 uF Arny, why didn't you round off these values? ** Maybe Arny was having an attack of digititis .... ........ Phil |
#13
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Chinese? ribbon mics?
"Phil Allison" wrote in message
"Arny Krueger" Capacitance is only significant when its impedance within the audible range is less than 10 times any parallel resistance. Three relevant resistances are 13K (the approximate maximum input impedance of a mic pre with phantom power), 2 K (the approximate input impedance of many mic preamps, and 600 ohms. I did a little spread sheet and came up with the following capacitances for 20 KHz and the three resistances: 600 ohms 0.066314561 uF 2,000 ohms 0.019894368 uF 13,000 ohms 0.003060672 uF ** All WILDLY wrong numbers !! That is true. Thanks for the general correction. The "correct" values a 1320 pF, 390 pF and 60 pF. almost, see below. C = 1 / ( 2. pi. F. R ) You forgot the factor of 10 in your equation, Phil. The true equation is: C = 1 / ( 20 * pi * F * R ) Your math may be off a tad as well, as I get: 1326 pF, 398 pF and 61 pF. I'll put my money on the error being in your estimation of Pi. But thanks for the check-out. ;-) |
#14
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Chinese? ribbon mics?
"Phil Allison" wrote in message
... I did a little spread sheet and came up with the following capacitances for 20 KHz and the three resistances: 600 ohms 0.066314561 uF 2,000 ohms 0.019894368 uF 13,000 ohms 0.003060672 uF ** All WILDLY wrong numbers !! The "correct" values a 1320 pF, 390 pF and 60 pF. C = 1 / ( 2. pi. F. R ) Also wrong. The correct values are 13.2nF, 3.98nF and 612pF Meindert |
#15
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Chinese? ribbon mics?
"William Sommerwerck" wrote in
message I did a little spread sheet and came up with the following capacitances for 20 KHz and the three resistances: 600 ohms 0.066314561 uF 2,000 ohms 0.019894368 uF 13,000 ohms 0.003060672 uF Arny, why didn't you round off these values? Quick cut-and-paste from Excel. Also very wrong as Phil correctly pointed out Reworked answers: 600 ohms 1326 pF 1,000 ohms 398 pF 13,000 ohms 61 pF |
#16
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Chinese? ribbon mics?
"Meindert Sprang" 600 ohms 0.066314561 uF 2,000 ohms 0.019894368 uF 13,000 ohms 0.003060672 uF ** All WILDLY wrong numbers !! The "correct" values a 1320 pF, 390 pF and 60 pF. C = 1 / ( 2. pi. F. R ) Also wrong. The correct values are 13.2nF, 3.98nF and 612pF Meindert ** I was expecting some ****WIT to say tat. Go read Arny's post again. His dodgy premise was Xc = 10 x R at 20kHz ........ Phil |
#17
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Chinese? ribbon mics?
"Arny Krueger" ** All WILDLY wrong numbers !! That is true. Thanks for the general correction. The "correct" values a 1320 pF, 390 pF and 60 pF. almost, see below. C = 1 / ( 2. pi. F. R ) You forgot the factor of 10 in your equation, Phil. ** Not at all. I supplied the general equation for Xc. One inputs R as required. The true equation is: C = 1 / ( 20 * pi * F * R ) Your math may be off a tad as well, as I get: 1326 pF, 398 pF and 61 pF. I'll put my money on the error being in your estimation of Pi. But thanks for the check-out. ;-) ** Love to see Arny's collection of mic leads. Specially the 1 foot ones. LOL ........ Phil |
#18
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Chinese? ribbon mics?
"Phil Allison" wrote in message
"Arny Krueger" ** All WILDLY wrong numbers !! That is true. Thanks for the general correction. The "correct" values a 1320 pF, 390 pF and 60 pF. almost, see below. C = 1 / ( 2. pi. F. R ) You forgot the factor of 10 in your equation, Phil. ** Not at all. I supplied the general equation for Xc. One inputs R as required. The true equation is: C = 1 / ( 20 * pi * F * R ) Your math may be off a tad as well, as I get: 1326 pF, 398 pF and 61 pF. I'll put my money on the error being in your estimation of Pi. But thanks for the check-out. ;-) ** Love to see Arny's collection of mic leads. Specially the 1 foot ones. LOL I actually do have a 1 foot mic lead, Phil. It's a polarity inverter implemented as a cable for mechanical & durability reasons. It's on the mic under the piano at church, so that it has the same polarity as the PZM on top. |
#19
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Chinese? ribbon mics?
"Pooh Bear" wrote
in message Arny Krueger wrote: "soundhaspriority" wrote in message Anybody try these? http://www.shinybox.com/index.php (click on condenser mikes.) Whether you have or not, I have afew questions that may relate to ribbons in general. 1. A load of 1000 ohms is recommended. Can I obtain this simply by paralleling the pre's input with a 1000 ohm resistor? Yes. The easiest way to do this involves a soldering iron and a few mods to a Hosa polarity inverter adaptor. Basically, you rewire the jumpers between pins 2 & 3 so that the inversion is gone, and then solder the 1K resistor between pins 2 and 3. I mention the Hosa polarity inverter because its far easier to find than the Switchcraft M/F empty shell adaptor. Most of the mic inputs I'm familiar with already have an input Z of about 2k ohms. Probably close enough for this mic in practice but if you want to do something like that, then make the resistor also equal to 2k to make it 1k overall. Point well taken. Definately one of those "what was I thinking" moments, since I used 2K ohms as a typical mic pre Zin in another post later on this morning. |
#20
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Chinese? ribbon mics?
"Arny Krueger" ** Love to see Arny's collection of mic leads. Specially the 1 foot ones. LOL I actually do have a 1 foot mic lead, Phil. ** An adaptor lead does not qualify as a mic lead. ........ Phil |
#21
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Chinese? ribbon mics?
On Thu, 11 May 2006 08:27:05 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote: I actually do have a 1 foot mic lead, Phil. It's a polarity inverter implemented as a cable for mechanical & durability reasons. It's on the mic under the piano at church, so that it has the same polarity as the PZM on top. And it's been blessed! |
#22
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Chinese? ribbon mics?
Don Pearce wrote:
I have done a little Googling, and learned that self noise is a problem. Any info on the mechanism that generates it? It is hard to see how it could be that far above thermal noise given what is in it. Thermal noise is a big deal when you have a transformer with a sub-ohm primary. It's a lot better now than it was in the RCA days. Also we can build stronger magnets than we could back then too. (Even so, evenness of the magnetic field seems more critical than strength... I am very big on linearity). --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#23
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Chinese? ribbon mics?
"paul packer" wrote in message
On Thu, 11 May 2006 08:27:05 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: I actually do have a 1 foot mic lead, Phil. It's a polarity inverter implemented as a cable for mechanical & durability reasons. It's on the mic under the piano at church, so that it has the same polarity as the PZM on top. And it's been blessed! Hmm. It's almost like we're watching Paul Packer morph into Art Sackman. ;-) |
#24
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Chinese? ribbon mics?
Arny Krueger wrote: "William Sommerwerck" wrote in message I did a little spread sheet and came up with the following capacitances for 20 KHz and the three resistances: 600 ohms 0.066314561 uF 2,000 ohms 0.019894368 uF 13,000 ohms 0.003060672 uF Arny, why didn't you round off these values? Quick cut-and-paste from Excel. Also very wrong as Phil correctly pointed out Reworked answers: 600 ohms 1326 pF 1,000 ohms 398 pF 13,000 ohms 61 pF and the correct resistance number to use is the output Z of the mic which is typically less than 600 Ohms which is why cable C is typically not an issue.. Mark |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Proper care & feeding of ribbon mics | Pro Audio | |||
The drum-mic question, yet again | Pro Audio | |||
Condenser mics | Pro Audio | |||
Condenser mics | Pro Audio | |||
Weather-proofing outdoor condenser mics | Pro Audio |