Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#81
Posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone have a schematic for a Behringer CX3400
"Mr.T" wrote: "Eeyore" wrote in message Simply 'looking' at it won't be any help. I know very well how Behringer assemble their 1u rack kit though (I've seen a number of other bits of their gear) and I know it's going to be far from straightforward to work on without a schematic. You *know* no such thing. Yes I do. Faulty switches, loose wires etc. are usually easy to fix without a schematic, as are many other obvious things. The problem is not a loose wire or a faulty switch. Graham |
#82
Posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone have a schematic for a Behringer CX3400
"Mr.T" wrote: *You're* the one making stupid comments about the cost of repairs WITHOUT including labour charges! I have not made any such comment. Stop misrepresenting what I said. Graham |
#83
Posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone have a schematic for a Behringer CX3400
"Romeo Rondeau" wrote in
message t Mr.T wrote: wrote in message ... no graham just want to bitch because behringer doesn't trust hacks like him in thier gear they perfer to have control over the customer service end of thioer business and insure all repairs are quality as well as incorporating any repair into a upgrade of the unit face it graham your simply not qualified to repair gear if you want to get qualified apply to behringer to become a authorized service center or shut the **** up Whilst being a big supporter of Behringers value for money, I simply can't agree with you on this. There are only two reasons for with holding service information. 1. To force you to pay more for repairs from a small number of "authorised agents". 2. To "encourage" you to throw it away and buy a new one. It simply doesn't wash to say that the cheapest gear on the market needs the highest standards of service support! If someone attempts a repair, and cocks it up, option 2 is still available :-) MrT. I'm not sure that Behringer is the cheapest anymore, Alto is giving them a run for their money :-) I'm not sure that Behringer has ever been the cheapest. For example, compare an ADA 8000 to a SM Pro audio PR8MKII w/ PR8MIIA. They are both basically 8-channel mic preamps with ADAT interfaces, but the construction and reliability of the ADA8000 is IME worlds ahead. |
#84
Posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone have a schematic for a Behringer CX3400
"Eeyore" wrote in message ... *You're* the one making stupid comments about the cost of repairs WITHOUT including labour charges! I have not made any such comment. Stop misrepresenting what I said. Sorry, where exactly was the labor cost in what you wrote again? "Eeyore" wrote Sounds cheap if it's a replacement SMT op-amp. You think so ? Here's a typical Audio op-amp. Even at Farnell's usurous prices and one-off it's only £0.52 ! http://uk.farnell.com/jsp/Semiconduc...RUMENTS/TL072A CD/displayProduct.jsp?sku=9593322 SMT pacakaging has nothing to do with increasing the price. The DIL version was 4p more in fact. I can't seem to spot it no matter how hard I look! MrT. |
#85
Posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone have a schematic for a Behringer CX3400
"Mr.T" MrT@home wrote in message
u "Arny Krueger" wrote in message . .. BTW, the EP 2500 is one of the few Behringer products for which a schematic has made its way to the public. Do you have a link? I'd be interested in taking a look myself. Unfortunately, My recollection is that I never had a link. I seem to recall that I obtained it as a download from one of the audio-related newsgroups that specializes in schematics and pictures. The interchanges that pointed to it are in the AAPLS archives. Your earlier comment that the readily available schematics for the QSC RMX series being sufficient for use in the repair of an EP 2500 is actually *that* applicable! |
#86
Posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone have a schematic for a Behringer CX3400
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message . .. I'm not sure that Behringer has ever been the cheapest. For example, compare an ADA 8000 to a SM Pro audio PR8MKII w/ PR8MIIA. They are both basically 8-channel mic preamps with ADAT interfaces, but the construction and reliability of the ADA8000 is IME worlds ahead. But is the price? IME your hard pressed to find anything cheaper in Australia, no matter how much worse. (given similar features at least) Note I do not automatically assume a correlation between price and quality, as many people mistakenly do. That's why I buy Behringer gear myself for some applications. MrT. |
#87
Posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone have a schematic for a Behringer CX3400
"Eeyore" wrote in message ... Simply 'looking' at it won't be any help. I know very well how Behringer assemble their 1u rack kit though (I've seen a number of other bits of their gear) and I know it's going to be far from straightforward to work on without a schematic. You *know* no such thing. Yes I do. Now you claim to be a Psychic as well, since you admitted you have yet to look at it. And those more intelligent people know psychics are charlatans! The problem is not a loose wire or a faulty switch. You may be right. You may even find out when you've had a look! MrT. |
#88
Posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone have a schematic for a Behringer CX3400
"Mr.T" MrT@home wrote in message u... wrote in message ... no graham just want to bitch because behringer doesn't trust hacks like him in thier gear they perfer to have control over the customer service end of thioer business and insure all repairs are quality as well as incorporating any repair into a upgrade of the unit face it graham your simply not qualified to repair gear if you want to get qualified apply to behringer to become a authorized service center or shut the **** up Whilst being a big supporter of Behringers value for money, I simply can't agree with you on this. There are only two reasons for with holding service information. 1. To force you to pay more for repairs from a small number of "authorised agents". 2. To "encourage" you to throw it away and buy a new one. It simply doesn't wash to say that the cheapest gear on the market needs the highest standards of service support! If someone attempts a repair, and cocks it up, option 2 is still available :-) MrT. that is not in line with the conversations I have had with behringer your assuming thngs that simply arnt supported by the facts the main reason they want to have equipment serviced by authorized agentsis to insure the quality of the work. the secoond reason is if a fail is found repeatedly that the fix will become a design change again its about the quality control anything else is speculation, I have had lots of conversations and experiance with behringers customer service its really world class. george |
#89
Posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone have a schematic for a Behringer CX3400
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... BTW, the EP 2500 is one of the few Behringer products for which a schematic has made its way to the public. Do you have a link? I'd be interested in taking a look myself. Unfortunately, My recollection is that I never had a link. I seem to recall that I obtained it as a download from one of the audio-related newsgroups that specializes in schematics and pictures. The interchanges that pointed to it are in the AAPLS archives. Your earlier comment that the readily available schematics for the QSC RMX series being sufficient for use in the repair of an EP 2500 is actually *that* applicable! Fair enough, I was just interested in checking the differences myself, but I'm sure you are probably quite correct. MrT. |
#90
Posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone have a schematic for a Behringer CX3400
"Mr.T" wrote: "Eeyore" wrote *You're* the one making stupid comments about the cost of repairs WITHOUT including labour charges! I have not made any such comment. Stop misrepresenting what I said. Sorry, where exactly was the labor cost in what you wrote again? When you're the client, I'll tell you my rate. Graham |
#91
Posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone have a schematic for a Behringer CX3400
"Mr.T" wrote: "Eeyore" wrote Here's a typical Audio op-amp. Even at Farnell's usurous prices and one-off it's only £0.52 ! http://uk.farnell.com/jsp/Semiconduc...RUMENTS/TL072A CD/displayProduct.jsp?sku=9593322 SMT pacakaging has nothing to do with increasing the price. The DIL version was 4p more in fact. I can't seem to spot it no matter how hard I look! Don't you believe me ? http://uk.farnell.com/jsp/Semiconduc...sp?sku=1106015 Graham |
#92
Posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone have a schematic for a Behringer CX3400
wrote in message
"Mr.T" MrT@home wrote in message ... "Mr.T" MrT@home wrote in message u... "Arny Krueger" wrote in message . .. BTW, the EP 2500 is one of the few Behringer products for which a schematic has made its way to the public. Do you have a link? I'd be interested in taking a look myself. BTW, I should have made clear I know the QSC schematics are at : http://www.qscaudio.com/support/tech...rt/schems1.htm IMO, they are close enough to use to repair an EP 2500! There are some trivial differences in parts layout, but that's about it. and those should point out the differences in the power suppy, protection,output circut designs and layouts. Well George it is quite clear that you don't read schematics any better than you compose simple English sentences. Those of us who are technically literate enough to compare the schematics of the RMX EP2500 that were made available to AAPLS some weeks ago to those of the corresponding QSC RMX already know the answer, which you seem to continue to deny. Here's the simple facts, which you were told about a few weeks back by Graham, myself, and maybe one or two others: (1) There are no appreciable differences in the schematics of the power supplies. The power transformers appear to be signficantly different, with the one in the RMX being physically larger. I think its a tad heavier. (2) There are no differences at all in the protection circuits because the schematics of the two amplifier circuit cards are practically identical, right down to the numbering of the off-board connections. (3) There are no differences at all in the circuit cards because the schematics of the two amplifier circuit cards are as I just said practically identical, again right down to the numbering of the off-board connections. (4) The physical layout of the cards and the chassis include trivial differences. Important parts of the chassis, such as the DIP switch that programs the amplifier's operation, are identical. unfortunately some people feel that haveing a different power section, layout, protection,and output section not to mention diffrent physical chasssis is not enough to qualify as a diffrent amp Wrong George. To review, the power sections are well-described by the same schematics, the protection circuits well-described by the same schematics, and the output sections are well-described by the same schematics. Any technician worth the title technican could easily use a RMX schematic to repair an EP 2500. I'm sitting here wondering if a Behringer tech has ever advised a customer to actually just do that! George, this illustates one of your most severe mental problems - you can't accept that people you are acquainted with actually know some aspects of audio techology far better than you, and due to your bull-headed obstinacy and going online intoxicated, you can't learn from them. George, I'm sure that when you sober up in a day or two, you'll have forgotten this whole interchange, just like you seem to have forgotten it when it last happened a few weeks back on AAPLS. Remember, the weekend is coming up and you have to be sober for the weekends when you actually have work to do! |
#94
Posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone have a schematic for a Behringer CX3400
"Mr.T" wrote: "Eeyore" wrote Simply 'looking' at it won't be any help. I know very well how Behringer assemble their 1u rack kit though (I've seen a number of other bits of their gear) and I know it's going to be far from straightforward to work on without a schematic. You *know* no such thing. Yes I do. Now you claim to be a Psychic as well, since you admitted you have yet to look at it. No, I claim to have experience. Something you're clearly lacking. Have you never for example asked a motor mechanic for help over the phone or do you expect him to have to dismantle your car before he can venture a diagnosis ? Now stop talking out of your ass. Graham |
#95
Posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone have a schematic for a Behringer CX3400
"Mr.T" MrT@home wrote in message
wrote in message ... and those shpould point out the diffrences in the powersuppy, protection,output circut designs and layouts unfortunatly some people feel that haveing a diffrent power section, layout,protection,and output section not to mention diffrent physical chasssis is not enough to qualify as a diffrent amp Well probably not enough to stop you using most of the QSC schematic anyway. Agreed. The parts placements differ, so that means that some of the pictorial diagrams in the QSC service manual don't apply to the EP 2500. And QSC does far more for their customers than Behringer in that regard. Agreed. If QSC turned the tables and cloned the Behringer A500, then we'd have good service documentation for it! ;-) |
#96
Posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone have a schematic for a Behringer CX3400
|
#97
Posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone have a schematic for a Behringer CX3400
"Phildo" wrote in message
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message . .. BTW, the EP 2500 is one of the few Behringer products for which a schematic has made its way to the public. Yeah, because Eyesore illegally posted it online as part of his anti-Behringer vendetta. BTW Phildo, aren't you about ready to fall off your meds, and write another poison pen letter about me to the pastor of the church where I serve? |
#98
Posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone have a schematic for a Behringer CX3400
Phildo wrote: Eeyore wrote: Phildo wrote: Eeyore wrote Thread title is self-explanatory. This is rich considering you were the one who illegally posted copyrighted Behringer schematics online. THEY ARE NOT COPYRIGHT you illiterate MORON ! Actually they are. You posted them illegally. Utter drivel. Graham |
#99
Posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone have a schematic for a Behringer CX3400
"Phildo" wrote in message
"Mr.T" MrT@home wrote in message u... "Eeyore" wrote in message ... So YOU work for nothing then? He has to. He lost his job because of Behringer hence his constant bitching about them. Phildo, just like you lost your job due to Mackie, hence your constant complaining about them? I don't think so! |
#100
Posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone have a schematic for a Behringer CX3400
Phildo wrote: Eeyore wrote: Phildo wrote: Eeyore wrote Thread title is self-explanatory. This is rich considering you were the one who illegally posted copyrighted Behringer schematics online. THEY ARE NOT COPYRIGHT you illiterate MORON ! Actually they are. You posted them illegally. To quote your favourite phrase on this matter "they are in the public domain". Make you stupid ignorant mind up which it is. Either they ARE in the public domain (which you use to excuse Behringer's copying) or theyre not. Which is it ? Graham |
#101
Posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone have a schematic for a Behringer CX3400
Phildo wrote: "Arny Krueger" wrote in message BTW, the EP 2500 is one of the few Behringer products for which a schematic has made its way to the public. Yeah, because Eyesore illegally posted it online It's not illegal. It's normal 'fair use'. as part of his anti-Behringer vendetta. I'm not anti-Behringer. I merely object to some of their dodgy practices. Graham |
#102
Posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone have a schematic for a Behringer CX3400
Phildo wrote: "Mr.T" MrT@home wrote Depends on the actual fault. Have you even looked yet? He claims to be a god in audio design yet cannot even fix something as simple as that. Of course I can fix it you ignorant ****. The amount of time it'll take will be much longer with a schematic. This is 'electronics repair 101' stuff you ****ing moron. Graham |
#103
Posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone have a schematic for a Behringer CX3400
wrote in message ... Whilst being a big supporter of Behringers value for money, I simply can't agree with you on this. There are only two reasons for with holding service information. 1. To force you to pay more for repairs from a small number of "authorised agents". 2. To "encourage" you to throw it away and buy a new one. It simply doesn't wash to say that the cheapest gear on the market needs the highest standards of service support! If someone attempts a repair, and cocks it up, option 2 is still available :-) that is not in line with the conversations I have had with behringer your assuming thngs that simply arnt supported by the facts the main reason they want to have equipment serviced by authorized agentsis to insure the quality of the work. Which they are entitled/required to do whilst it is under warranty. However when it is not, the responsibility and choice of repairer passes to the owner. It smells suspiciously like you are simply swallowing the company line of excuse. the secoond reason is if a fail is found repeatedly that the fix will become a design change again its about the quality control Once again that info is gained from warranty repair work, and people who CHOOSE to use an authorised agent for non warranty work. Unless they are prepared to modify any design faults free of charge after the warranty has expired, it is no longer their concern. Lets face it, more Behringer equipment is probably junked after the warranty expires, than is repaired by Behringer agents. *IF* they also offered to buy back the junked items for inspection, I may believe their interest was real rather than just a poor excuse. And it costs nothing for some companies to provide an exchange service to the customer at cost price. The customer saves the comission usually paid to the shop/retail outlet. Behringer do not provide such a service. anything else is speculation, I have had lots of conversations and experiance with behringers customer service its really world class. It possibly is, the point is whether you should be FORCED to use it when the equipment is no longer under warranty. Fortunately not ALL companies are as bad when it comes to customer service choice. Shame too, as I am a big Behringer supporter otherwise, however there is NO WAY I would condone such *pathetic* excuses for with-holding service information. MrT. |
#104
Posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone have a schematic for a Behringer CX3400
Phildo wrote: "Mr.T" MrT@home wrote "Eeyore" wrote So YOU work for nothing then? He has to. He lost his job because of Behringer Untrue. hence his constant bitching about them. You'll be losing YOUR job if you maintain your crackhead libellous posts. I've been tempted before to complain to your employer and maybe now it's the time. Graham |
#105
Posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone have a schematic for a Behringer CX3400
"Mr.T" MrT@home wrote in message
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message . .. I'm not sure that Behringer has ever been the cheapest. For example, compare an ADA 8000 to a SM Pro audio PR8MKII w/ PR8MIIA. They are both basically 8-channel mic preamps with ADAT interfaces, but the construction and reliability of the ADA8000 is IME worlds ahead. But is the price? I believe so. I think the street price of the ADA8000 was about $50 more at the ca. $200 level. IME your hard pressed to find anything cheaper in Australia, no matter how much worse. (given similar features at least) Trust me, the SM Pro audio gear I've seen makes Berhinger gear look absolutely brilliant. I mean that all I ever bought from them was a PR-8, but it took a soldering iron to make it work right when I first took it out of the box. One end of a cap was dangling in the air! It's sitting right under a couple of ADA 8000s which were put into similar service on the same day. It looks like one channel of the PR-8 is already non-op, while the ADA 8000s soldier on bravely. Note I do not automatically assume a correlation between price and quality, as many people mistakenly do. Agreed. That's why I buy Behringer gear myself for some applications. So far my old Behringer digital eq died after about 8 years, and my newer Berhinger mixer needed a new power supply because Guitar Center sold me a bad one, but I never got around to using the new mixer until it was out of warranty. Oh, and I had a couple of ECM 8000s loose so much sensitivity that I scrapped them after about 2 years. |
#106
Posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone have a schematic for a Behringer CX3400
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Phildo" wrote in message "Arny Krueger" wrote in message . .. BTW, the EP 2500 is one of the few Behringer products for which a schematic has made its way to the public. Yeah, because Eyesore illegally posted it online as part of his anti-Behringer vendetta. BTW Phildo, aren't you about ready to fall off your meds, and write another poison pen letter about me to the pastor of the church where I serve? No need Arny. There are people in your church who are watching you very closely and taking careful notes. Let's just say moves are afoot to show you up for what you really are. Phildo |
#107
Posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone have a schematic for a Behringer CX3400
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message . .. "Phildo" wrote in message "Mr.T" MrT@home wrote in message u... "Eeyore" wrote in message ... So YOU work for nothing then? He has to. He lost his job because of Behringer hence his constant bitching about them. Phildo, just like you lost your job due to Mackie, hence your constant complaining about them? I don't think so! I didn't lose any job to Mackie. I don't like their gear. Eyesore DID lose his job because of Behringer though. Get real Arny. That was pathetic, even for you. Phildo |
#108
Posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone have a schematic for a Behringer CX3400
Arny Krueger wrote: "Mr.T" MrT@home wrote wrote and those shpould point out the diffrences in the powersuppy, protection,output circut designs and layouts unfortunatly some people feel that haveing a diffrent power section, layout,protection,and output section not to mention diffrent physical chasssis is not enough to qualify as a diffrent amp Well probably not enough to stop you using most of the QSC schematic anyway. Agreed. The parts placements differ, so that means that some of the pictorial diagrams in the QSC service manual don't apply to the EP 2500. And QSC does far more for their customers than Behringer in that regard. Agreed. If QSC turned the tables and cloned the Behringer A500, then we'd have good service documentation for it! ;-) That would be classic. I'd love to see Behringer's kit copied. It would be divine justice. Graham |
#109
Posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone have a schematic for a Behringer CX3400
Arny Krueger wrote: "Phildo" wrote "Arny Krueger" wrote BTW, the EP 2500 is one of the few Behringer products for which a schematic has made its way to the public. Yeah, because Eyesore illegally posted it online as part of his anti-Behringer vendetta. BTW Phildo, aren't you about ready to fall off your meds, and write another poison pen letter about me to the pastor of the church where I serve? Did you know Phildo once emailed me (before he fell out with me) encouraging me to do the same ? Graham |
#110
Posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone have a schematic for a Behringer CX3400
"Eeyore" wrote in message ... Depends on the actual fault. Have you even looked yet? He claims to be a god in audio design yet cannot even fix something as simple as that. Of course I can fix it. The amount of time it'll take will be much longer with a schematic. You should be pleased you don't have one then, will save you "much" time :-) MrT. |
#111
Posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone have a schematic for a Behringer CX3400
"Eeyore" wrote in message ... *You're* the one making stupid comments about the cost of repairs WITHOUT including labour charges! I have not made any such comment. Stop misrepresenting what I said. Sorry, where exactly was the labor cost in what you wrote again? When you're the client, I'll tell you my rate. So no mis-representation on my part at all, just more bull-****ting on your part! MrT. |
#112
Posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone have a schematic for a Behringer CX3400
"Phildo" wrote in message
"Mr.T" MrT@home wrote in message u... Depends on the actual fault. Have you even looked yet? He claims to be a god in audio design yet cannot even fix something as simple as that. (1) Design work and repair work are distinct skills. They often come together, but there's no rule saying they have to. (2) Graham hasn't tried and failed - he's just griping about the absence of reasonable service tools. Do you honestly think the legendary studiomater designer would lower himself to look at Behringer gear? Seems to me that he already has. He's only making a fuss because he hates Behringer after they put him out of a job. Narhh, its not that simple. Graham has a well-known gripe that many people share. I don't know anybody that is being helped by Behringer's secrecy about their schematics, not even them! It's quite clear that few can compete with Behringer when it comes to turning schematics into products, so they could put them on every bathroom wall in China, and all that would happen is that a few smart Chinese would get a little smarter. ;-) If you want a real trip, check out the guts of a DCX 2496. The contents of the box are almost entirely trivial and obvious. Almost whole story is in the programming of the SHARC chip. |
#113
Posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone have a schematic for a Behringer CX3400
"Eeyore" wrote in message ... Here's a typical Audio op-amp. Even at Farnell's usurous prices and one-off it's only £0.52 ! http://uk.farnell.com/jsp/Semiconduc...RUMENTS/TL072A CD/displayProduct.jsp?sku=9593322 SMT pacakaging has nothing to do with increasing the price. The DIL version was 4p more in fact. I can't seem to spot it no matter how hard I look! Don't you believe me ? NO!!!!!!!!! http://uk.farnell.com/jsp/Semiconduc...RUMENTS/TL072C P/displayProduct.jsp?sku=1106015 Where does it list the labor cost to replace SMT components? MrT. |
#114
Posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone have a schematic for a Behringer CX3400
"Phildo" wrote in message
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message . .. "Phildo" wrote in message "Mr.T" MrT@home wrote in message u... "Eeyore" wrote in message ... So YOU work for nothing then? He has to. He lost his job because of Behringer hence his constant bitching about them. Phildo, just like you lost your job due to Mackie, hence your constant complaining about them? I don't think so! I didn't lose any job to Mackie. Can't read, eh Phildo? That's what I said! I don't like their gear. So what? How many years did you badmouth it on AAPLS and viciouisly attack just about every poor stiff who made the mistake of admitting Eyesore DID lose his job because of Behringer though. Prove it. Get real Arny. That was pathetic, even for you. Phildo, I knew I could count on your illiteracy and arrogance to cause you to misread my post and again humliate yourself in public. |
#115
Posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone have a schematic for a Behringer CX3400
"Mr.T" wrote: "Eeyore" wrote *You're* the one making stupid comments about the cost of repairs WITHOUT including labour charges! I have not made any such comment. Stop misrepresenting what I said. Sorry, where exactly was the labor cost in what you wrote again? When you're the client, I'll tell you my rate. So no mis-representation on my part at all, just more bull-****ting on your part! What's YOUR salary / income then ? You tell me yours, I'll tell you my hourly rate. Graham |
#116
Posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone have a schematic for a Behringer CX3400
"Eeyore" wrote in
message Phildo wrote: "Mr.T" MrT@home wrote "Eeyore" wrote So YOU work for nothing then? He has to. He lost his job because of Behringer Untrue. hence his constant bitching about them. You'll be losing YOUR job if you maintain your crackhead libellous posts. I've been tempted before to complain to your employer and maybe now it's the time. Naahh, its not worth it to drop to Phildo's level. Phildo tried to force me out of my volunteer's job at church by sending a poison pen email to the pastor of my church. Trouble is, Phildo's over-the-top writing style made it completely obvious that the guy who wrote it is completely unhinged. We've had a few prayer meetings for Phildo, but it is unlikely that we're going to help him much. |
#117
Posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone have a schematic for a Behringer CX3400
"Eeyore" wrote in message ... Simply 'looking' at it won't be any help. I know very well how Behringer assemble their 1u rack kit though (I've seen a number of other bits of their gear) and I know it's going to be far from straightforward to work on without a schematic. You *know* no such thing. Yes I do. Now you claim to be a Psychic as well, since you admitted you have yet to look at it. No, I claim to have experience. Something you're clearly lacking. Have you never for example asked a motor mechanic for help over the phone or do you expect him to have to dismantle your car before he can venture a diagnosis ? And NO mechanic or technician worth the title would think an unsighted "diagnosis" was something he KNEW for certain. Obviously you are neither. Now stop talking out of your ass. How true, now stop looking in the mirror! :-) MrT. |
#118
Posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone have a schematic for a Behringer CX3400
"Phildo" wrote in message
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Phildo" wrote in message "Arny Krueger" wrote in message . .. BTW, the EP 2500 is one of the few Behringer products for which a schematic has made its way to the public. Yeah, because Eyesore illegally posted it online as part of his anti-Behringer vendetta. BTW Phildo, aren't you about ready to fall off your meds, and write another poison pen letter about me to the pastor of the church where I serve? No need Arny. There are people in your church who are watching you very closely and taking careful notes. Oh yes Phildo, and they are flying around in black helicopters! ;-) Let's just say moves are afoot to show you up for what you really are. Maybe the'll string me up this Saturday when I video the youth pastor's ordination ceremony? LOL! |
#119
Posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone have a schematic for a Behringer CX3400
"Eeyore" wrote in
message Arny Krueger wrote: "Phildo" wrote "Arny Krueger" wrote BTW, the EP 2500 is one of the few Behringer products for which a schematic has made its way to the public. Yeah, because Eyesore illegally posted it online as part of his anti-Behringer vendetta. BTW Phildo, aren't you about ready to fall off your meds, and write another poison pen letter about me to the pastor of the church where I serve? Did you know Phildo once emailed me (before he fell out with me) encouraging me to do the same ? Oh, I believe that. It's Phildo at his finest. Very sad - it's troubling to see someone that unhappy. |
#120
Posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone have a schematic for a Behringer CX3400
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message . .. Agreed. If QSC turned the tables and cloned the Behringer A500, then we'd have good service documentation for it! ;-) It's already a clone of .... whoops I've forgotten. (I even had the sales brochure at one time.) Maybe they have a schematic, if someone else can remember who it was? I can't see QSC wanting to copy it though, it's not really all that good. MrT. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
About Behringer | Pro Audio | |||
Behringer or ? | Tech | |||
Behringer B1 or C1??? | General | |||
Behringer UB2442FX Mixer Schematic/voltages Needed | Pro Audio | |||
BEHRINGER SHIPS THE Behringer V-AMPIRE LX1-112 | Pro Audio |