Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
recording drums on two tracks
Just for the record I'd like to say that recording drums on two tracks
is madness. Eight tracks are pretty limiting. Especially on the machines that let you just record on two tracks. Maybe if I was good at recording, good at listening to drums, I'd suffer less grief. But for me, the drums mix is always a bit sour in mixdown -- too much ride, too little snare, too little toms, etc. And I can't adjust anything, so the only choice is bringing my drummer back in, begging my roommate out of the house for a weekend, setting everything up again, and then spending another weekend recording only to find that the kick drum has disappeared. I'm going crazy. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Nat wrote:
Just for the record I'd like to say that recording drums on two tracks is madness. Eight tracks are pretty limiting. Especially on the machines that let you just record on two tracks. Hell, I use two tracks for the whole orchestra half the time. I don't get the need for ukubillion drum submixes. Either the drums sound good and are appropriate for the mix or they aren't. Maybe if I was good at recording, good at listening to drums, I'd suffer less grief. But for me, the drums mix is always a bit sour in mixdown -- too much ride, too little snare, too little toms, etc. And I can't adjust anything, so the only choice is bringing my drummer back in, begging my roommate out of the house for a weekend, setting everything up again, and then spending another weekend recording only to find that the kick drum has disappeared. I'm going crazy. To some extent you can deal with that sort of thing with EQ, but my suggestion is to keep trying, and also to try and listen to some commercial recording and JUST listen to the drums and how the drums fall into the mix. Get practice at isolating the different tracks in your head. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Nat" wrote in message
m... Just for the record I'd like to say that recording drums on two tracks is madness. Madness that was a luxury 35 years ago! The cleverest method I ever ran into for an 8 track recording of a rock band was overhead, rack toms and kick on one track and snare and floor tom mikes on another. This lets you use a combination of eq. and balance between the two tracks to achieve a great mono drum sound. -- Bob Olhsson Audio Mastery, Nashville TN Mastering, Audio for Picture, Mix Evaluation and Quality Control Over 40 years making people sound better than they ever imagined! 615.385.8051 http://www.hyperback.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Madness that was a luxury 35 years ago!
I'll tell you what, google groups is a luxury. Wow. I really appreciate all the advice -- thanks so much for the replies. My drummer and I are going into a marathon session this weekend and I hope to incorporate a lot of your suggestions. This album is only my second, and it's my first time tackling drums, but then even imperfectly recorded acoustic drums knock the socks of that drum machine I used last time. Lucky for me, I have a technically excellent drummer playing with me, and he's nice enough not to have killed me yet for all my retries. So I have some faith... Thanks again. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Madness that was a luxury 35 years ago!
I'll tell you what, google groups is a luxury. Wow. I really appreciate all the advice -- thanks so much for the replies. My drummer and I are going into a marathon session this weekend and I hope to incorporate a lot of your suggestions. This album is only my second, and it's my first time tackling drums, but then even imperfectly recorded acoustic drums knock the socks of that drum machine I used last time. Lucky for me, I have a technically excellent drummer playing with me, and he's nice enough not to have killed me yet for all my retries. So I have some faith... Thanks again. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I would try to record with 2 o/h mics and the kick
just for some space then hard pan those 2 mics and leave the kick down the center. and mix down to 2 tracks almost no thinking to how to get it to come out right. "playonATcomcast.net" wrote in message ... With a decent drummer and a reasonable room, you can get a great drum sound with one overhead and a kick. I was messing around with this just the other day... I had four mics set up, but when I played it back with just the OH and the kick alone, it sounded great. The thing is that the drummer has to be able to balance the kit with how he plays it. Al On 15 Aug 2004 21:35:10 -0700, (Nat) wrote: Just for the record I'd like to say that recording drums on two tracks is madness. Eight tracks are pretty limiting. Especially on the machines that let you just record on two tracks. Maybe if I was good at recording, good at listening to drums, I'd suffer less grief. But for me, the drums mix is always a bit sour in mixdown -- too much ride, too little snare, too little toms, etc. And I can't adjust anything, so the only choice is bringing my drummer back in, begging my roommate out of the house for a weekend, setting everything up again, and then spending another weekend recording only to find that the kick drum has disappeared. I'm going crazy. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
In article %LvUc.133114$J06.132726@pd7tw2no, Doug Schultz
wrote: I would try to record with 2 o/h mics and the kick just for some space then hard pan those 2 mics and leave the kick down the center. and mix down to 2 tracks almost no thinking to how to get it to come out right. Depending on how it sounds and what kinda mic technique you use, you may want to pan the 2 overheads in slightly if the stereo image is making things sound a little wishy washy. Can tighten things up in your mix, depending obviously on what you get. David Correia Celebration Sound Warren, Rhode Island www.CelebrationSound.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Nat wrote:
Just for the record I'd like to say that recording drums on two tracks is madness. Eight tracks are pretty limiting. Especially on the machines that let you just record on two tracks. Maybe if I was good at recording, good at listening to drums, I'd suffer less grief. But for me, the drums mix is always a bit sour in mixdown -- too much ride, too little snare, too little toms, etc. And I can't adjust anything, so the only choice is bringing my drummer back in, begging my roommate out of the house for a weekend, setting everything up again, and then spending another weekend recording only to find that the kick drum has disappeared. I'm going crazy. I've had success with an A-B pair of omni's in front of the drum kit, placed at the height of the top of kick drum. It needs a good, large room though. Stig Erik Tangen |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"david" wrote in message ... In article %LvUc.133114$J06.132726@pd7tw2no, Doug Schultz wrote: I would try to record with 2 o/h mics and the kick just for some space then hard pan those 2 mics and leave the kick down the center. and mix down to 2 tracks almost no thinking to how to get it to come out right. Depending on how it sounds and what kinda mic technique you use, you may want to pan the 2 overheads in slightly if the stereo image is making things sound a little wishy washy. Can tighten things up in your mix, depending obviously on what you get. You are right of course. I very rarely pan all the way and I was just typing in a hurry should have been more precise. with drum mixes I start at the 3 and 9 o'clock positions and then see how bad the phasing is and move them in from there. Doug |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
I never tried that. I like that idea and I'm looking forward to testing it out.
"Doug Schultz" wrote in message news:SdKUc.141902$gE.9298@pd7tw3no... "david" wrote in message ... In article %LvUc.133114$J06.132726@pd7tw2no, Doug Schultz wrote: I would try to record with 2 o/h mics and the kick just for some space then hard pan those 2 mics and leave the kick down the center. and mix down to 2 tracks almost no thinking to how to get it to come out right. Depending on how it sounds and what kinda mic technique you use, you may want to pan the 2 overheads in slightly if the stereo image is making things sound a little wishy washy. Can tighten things up in your mix, depending obviously on what you get. You are right of course. I very rarely pan all the way and I was just typing in a hurry should have been more precise. with drum mixes I start at the 3 and 9 o'clock positions and then see how bad the phasing is and move them in from there. Doug |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
I never tried that. I like that idea and I'm looking forward to testing it out.
"Doug Schultz" wrote in message news:SdKUc.141902$gE.9298@pd7tw3no... "david" wrote in message ... In article %LvUc.133114$J06.132726@pd7tw2no, Doug Schultz wrote: I would try to record with 2 o/h mics and the kick just for some space then hard pan those 2 mics and leave the kick down the center. and mix down to 2 tracks almost no thinking to how to get it to come out right. Depending on how it sounds and what kinda mic technique you use, you may want to pan the 2 overheads in slightly if the stereo image is making things sound a little wishy washy. Can tighten things up in your mix, depending obviously on what you get. You are right of course. I very rarely pan all the way and I was just typing in a hurry should have been more precise. with drum mixes I start at the 3 and 9 o'clock positions and then see how bad the phasing is and move them in from there. Doug |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Nat, are you looking for ways to record the entire kit with 2 mics,
or, are you trying to improve the stereo submix of drums that you're forced to do because you only have 8 tracks? I'm guessing it's the latter of the 2. One thing someone else touched on is getting a sense of how the drums sit with other instrumentation, even if just scratch tracks, in the mix. I mic drums with 3 mics and submix to a mono track, and I have found out the hard way that setting levels to what sounds like a 'real" kit when bouncing will leave your track kick shy and snare shy at mixdown. So I usually make the kick and snare a *little* louder in the bounce, to where it almost seems too loud, so that they don't disappear after I add 6 guitars, tambourine, handclaps and vocals! Yeah, it's the latter. I understand that a lot of songs are recorded starting with the drums, but I -- for better and worse -- have been recording drums lately after I have other tracks down... I think my drummer prefers it, and it has worked out so far. He's got good, strict, click-track timing, so there's not too many timing problems for me doing it that way. So, as of late, I actually have mixed most of my drums in the context of the song itself. In the past, I've had problems with the snare being too quiet in the mix, and I wonder now if I was just working for a perfect set sound at the time without hearing it as part of the mix as a whole. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
it depends on the style of music. many symphonic recordings are made
with just two mics covering 85 people. old-school big band probably had one mic hung over the drummer and the rest was caught incidentally in the other mics. ringo star, early days, a single coles mic as an overhead, and a kick drum mic (i think a fet). if you're doing modern heavy metal, you need lots of mics, because the music likes that crisp separation. but you could do a decent job with two mics. just make sure they are two good mics! set the first mic about 6 feet over the drummers head and about 8 feet in front of him. have him play loud. put the second mic on the kick drum. then during mixdown, put a lot of compression on the overhead mic. that will suck up all the low sounds so your tom fills will be heard. also, when you mic futher back like this, the kit will even out volume wise. you need a room with at least a 12 foot ceiling do do this justice, or your ceiling will be giving you lame sonic bounce in a bad way into the distant mic. Using 3 mics gives you John Bonham from Led Zepplin (a pair of spaced u87s up and in front, and a kick drum mic). nobody can say he had bad drum sounds. lots of 60's drums used 2 or three mics. just make sure the overhead(s) is at least a number of feet away and then compress the hell out of it. you'll get that "giant sucking sound" that Ross Perot referred to in the 1992 campaigns. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
"xy" wrote in message
om... ... just make sure the overhead(s) is at least a number of feet away and then compress the hell out of it. you'll get that "giant sucking sound" that Ross Perot referred to in the 1992 campaigns. I never saw anybody compress an overhead during the '60s. Sometimes the whole drum track might get compressed in the mix because of a balance problem but it is totally mythology that we used to compress drums as SOP. -- Bob Olhsson Audio Mastery, Nashville TN Mastering, Audio for Picture, Mix Evaluation and Quality Control Over 40 years making people sound better than they ever imagined! 615.385.8051 http://www.hyperback.com |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
but you could do a decent job with two mics. just make sure they are
two good mics! set the first mic about 6 feet over the drummers head and about 8 feet in front of him. have him play loud. put the second mic on the kick drum. Sadly, I'm always forced to tune out when people say "good mics." I gotta do everything with my 57s and 58s. It's kinda fun, pretty impossible. On many instruments and vocs I mic model, which is cheating and probably pretty transparent, but it makes me feel like a regular princess, changing from fancy mic to fancy mic at will. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
I've been recording my band with just an AKG stereo microphone lately.
I think it has a pair of CK-1 cardioid capsules, in an XY configuration. I'm reallu liking it. I'm actually recording the whole band with it. The thing I love about this approach is that it completely removes the recording equipment from the recording process. You just set up the mike, hit record, and start playing. If it doesn't sound right, you don't mess with the microphone or the preamp or the recorder, you mess with your instruments and your bandmates and perhaps the room. Instead of pushing faders up and down, you push musicians around to get the balance you need. Instead of using EQ on a drum track, you tune the drum. ulysses In article , Nat wrote: Just for the record I'd like to say that recording drums on two tracks is madness. Eight tracks are pretty limiting. Especially on the machines that let you just record on two tracks. Maybe if I was good at recording, good at listening to drums, I'd suffer less grief. But for me, the drums mix is always a bit sour in mixdown -- too much ride, too little snare, too little toms, etc. And I can't adjust anything, so the only choice is bringing my drummer back in, begging my roommate out of the house for a weekend, setting everything up again, and then spending another weekend recording only to find that the kick drum has disappeared. I'm going crazy. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Nat wrote:
Just for the record I'd like to say that recording drums on two tracks is madness. Eight tracks are pretty limiting. Use fewer mics. Kind regards Peter Larsen -- ******************************************* * My site is at: http://www.muyiovatki.dk * ******************************************* |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Nat
wrote: Just for the record I'd like to say that recording drums on two tracks is madness. Eight tracks are pretty limiting. Especially on the machines that let you just record on two tracks. Maybe if I was good at recording, good at listening to drums, I'd suffer less grief. But for me, the drums mix is always a bit sour in mixdown -- too much ride, too little snare, too little toms, etc. And I can't adjust anything, so the only choice is bringing my drummer back in, begging my roommate out of the house for a weekend, setting everything up again, and then spending another weekend recording only to find that the kick drum has disappeared. I'm going crazy. Back in the 80s and 90s there were a lot of us tracking drums with ever more mics. My record was 22 on a metal record; top and bottom mics on the toms (polarity flipped) with shell triggers keying gates etc. Looking back it all seems absurd. My favorite drum recordings continue to be a 2-3 mics in a nice room with high ceilings and of course a great player. I get the impression you are recording in a small room. Here is where close and multiple micing gets really ugly on anything heavier than some light brush work. My personal feeling about this kind of enviornment is to embrace it for what it is. A single radioshack PZM on the wall (any wall for that matter) will give you a fat and honest sound. It will sound distinct, organic and no one will confuse it with a machine. Try it and let your drummer hear it. He may want to adjust his dynamics but you may both be surprised. Then again it all depends on the song along with countless other variables. Just keep trying and dont rule anything out! There are no rules. Some of those mega-mic setups in the 90s actually worked on occasion;-) |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Sonicanuck wrote:
Back in the 80s and 90s there were a lot of us tracking drums with ever more mics. My record was 22 on a metal record; top and bottom mics on the toms (polarity flipped) with shell triggers keying gates etc. Looking back it all seems absurd. My favorite drum recordings continue to be a 2-3 mics in a nice room with high ceilings and of course a great player. I get the impression you are recording in a small room. Here is where close and multiple micing gets really ugly on anything heavier than some light brush work. My personal feeling about this kind of enviornment is to embrace it for what it is. A single radioshack PZM on the wall (any wall for that matter) will give you a fat and honest sound. It will sound distinct, organic and no one will confuse it with a machine. Try it and let your drummer hear it. He may want to adjust his dynamics but you may both be surprised. Then again it all depends on the song along with countless other variables. Just keep trying and dont rule anything out! There are no rules. Some of those mega-mic setups in the 90s actually worked on occasion;-) I'm with you there. One of the cleanest drum recordings I've ever worked with was done in an 8x12 room with a 10' ceiling, assorted cheap sound deadening (read: cardboard egg cartons on parts of the walls), with a D112 on the kick, SM-58 on the snare, and a pair of RS PZMs, each attached to a 2x2' piece of plywood and those arranged in a V shape, hung about 4' above the drums, and panned hard left and right. The balance of the toms and overheads was near-perfect and the stereo image on cymbal washes and tom rolls was amazing. The 58 was blended in just enough to add some 'snap' and body to the snare. I've recently done an album with the same drummer (much newer and better-maintained kit, fortunately) in which we used 11 mics on the kit - double kicks, snare, one each for three rack toms and a floor tom, one each for hat and ride, and an overhead pair. I can't say that the drums turned out significantly better... sure there's more control, but sometimes the overabundance of sources just leads to cancellation and other problems too. --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0514-0, 04/05/2005 Tested on: 4/7/2005 3:28:00 AM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2005 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
High quality audio cassette to cd recording | Pro Audio | |||
Recording Drums | Pro Audio | |||
Why all the bad recordings | High End Audio | |||
recording drums with aardvark direct pro 2496 | Pro Audio | |||
problem recording on SMP system with Win2K | Pro Audio |