Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Cleaning condenser mic capsule
What liquid best to use on a (true) condenser mic capsule to clean -
grime and dust, all well-stuck on ? Iso, distilled water, borax !? And for that matter, same question for electret ? Is the gold evaporation on the outside or inside, so what level of delicacy - extreme, or extremely extreme ? Capsule is CK12 - no, not a brass-ring one, sadly. Also some CK1 etc. geoff |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Cleaning condenser mic capsule
On 9/11/2020 7:28 AM, geoff wrote: What liquid best to use on a (true) condenser mic capsule to clean - grime and dust, all well-stuck on ? Iso, distilled water, borax !? Distilled water or alcohol, on a soft brush. It's been suggested that steam be used to deposit a proper amount of water on the brush. DO NOT USE STEAM TO CLEAN THE DIAPHRAGM! And for that matter, same question for electret ? Same answer. Is the gold evaporation on the outside or inside, so what level of delicacy - extreme, or extremely extreme ? It's on the outer surface of the diaphragm, so be extremely cautious with it. Capsule is CK12Â* - no, not a brass-ring one, sadly. Also some CK1 etc. Best advice is not to try it on a high quality microphone. Better practice on something cheap first. Best is to send the mic back to the manufacturer or a trusted repair person who has enough experience to not screw it up. David Josephson (Josephson Microphones) used to have an article on his web site about cleaning a mic diaphragm that he distilled from an on-line discussion in rec.audio.pro. Maybe some of that is still in an archive if you want to try to find it. David decided that too many people were ruining too-good microphones by attempting to clean the diaphragm and ultimately removed the article from his web page, replacing it with this: More than twenty years ago, we posted some comments to rec.audio.pro about cleaning condenser microphone diaphragms. I have decided to retire the local copy of that article, because it seems to inspire too many to attempt things that are unwise. One thing left out of the original article is this: cleaning should only be done if the microphone fails to work otherwise. The difference caused by a little extra weight may be audible, but not huge. Got that? No cleaning unless it *doesn't work.* And in no case should you use any source of heat near the microphone. Someone thought that what we wrote suggested putting steam on the microphone diaphragm. !!?! ... the steam is to put a slight amount of pure water on your cleaning brush, not the diaphragm! No heat anywhere near diaphragm, OK? With all due respect to others in the field, if the conductive layer on the diaphragm is so fragile that gentle cleaning with distilled water, alcohol and cotton or a slightly damp fine brush damages it, you have no business cleaning it. That said, losing a small amount of metallization has little or no effect -- the diaphragm will still behave as it did before, the active area is just reduced a little. A real hazard, however, is that the capsule will become contaminated internally with whatever the cleaning medium carries with it, and will forever be noisy. This is particularly a problem with older PVC diaphragms that have cracks. Unless you have a way to test for ionic contamination of the surface and resulting leakage resistance of the capsule, don't try it. If any Josephson microphone appears to need cleaning, please send it back to the factory in California. The cost is minimal and you can be sure of original performance when it's done. -- For a good time, call http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Help With Condenser Mic Capsule ID | Pro Audio | |||
??? Electret Condenser Capsule??? | Pro Audio | |||
Large capsule condenser | Pro Audio | |||
(MIC) --AKG c460 b with ck5 condenser capsule--whats a fair price?? | Pro Audio | |||
condenser mic capsule impedance and tube circuitry | Pro Audio |