Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Listed Specifications for Guitar Speaker Frequency Range
When viewing general specifications for guitar speakers, the frequency response curve often displays a larger frequency range than what's listed under the "Frequency Range". If the listed frequency range is 70-5000Hz, yet the frequency response curve shows activity below 70 Hz, is the speaker audibly reproducing the extended lower range in the plot? If so, what is the listed "Frequency Range" actually denoting?
|
#2
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Listed Specifications for Guitar Speaker Frequency Range
On 4/19/2019 3:41 PM, James Price wrote:
When viewing general specifications for guitar speakers, the frequency response curve often displays a larger frequency range than what's listed under the "Frequency Range". If the listed frequency range is 70-5000Hz, yet the frequency response curve shows activity below 70 Hz, is the speaker audibly reproducing the extended lower range in the plot? If so, what is the listed "Frequency Range" actually denoting? The frequency response plots, as well as the operating characteristics, come from the marketing department, not the engineering department. Sure, the speaker will reproduce something below 70 Hz, but as a guitar player, you probably don't need it. What they want you to believe is that it will do a good job as a guitar amplifier speaker, which, hopefully, is why you're buying it. The raw stated or plotted frequency response of a loudspeaker is more theoretical than practical, since in the real world, it's a function of the amplifier, the enclosure, and even the wiring between the amplifier and speaker voice coil. -- For a good time, call http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com |
#3
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Listed Specifications for Guitar Speaker Frequency Range
James Price wrote:
When viewing general specifications for guitar speakers, the frequency resp= onse curve often displays a larger frequency range than what's listed under= the "Frequency Range". If the listed frequency range is 70-5000Hz, yet the= frequency response curve shows activity below 70 Hz, is the speaker audibl= y reproducing the extended lower range in the plot? If so, what is the list= ed "Frequency Range" actually denoting? The listed "frequency range" is most often denoting that the marketing department pulled a number out of their butt and that the manufacturer does not take you seriously. If you see a "frequency response" with tolerances, such as 70-5000Hz +/-3dB, you know the frequency will stay within those tolerances over that range at full rated power. Outside of that range you probably get output but you don't know what it will be. If a frequency range is given without tolerances it is meaningless except in that it tells you to avoid a vendor who gives fake numbers. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#4
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Listed Specifications for Guitar Speaker Frequency Range
On Friday, April 19, 2019 at 5:07:35 PM UTC-5, Scott Dorsey wrote:
The listed "frequency range" is most often denoting that the marketing department pulled a number out of their butt and that the manufacturer does not take you seriously. If you see a "frequency response" with tolerances, such as 70-5000Hz +/-3dB, you know the frequency will stay within those tolerances over that range at full rated power. Outside of that range you probably get output but you don't know what it will be. If a frequency range is given without tolerances it is meaningless except in that it tells you to avoid a vendor who gives fake numbers. In your experience, would a guitar speaker (not bass guitar speaker) be capable of producing low frequencies around 40 Hz at any output? I ask because I was privy to a discussion where it was claimed that 1) they don't have the excursion needed to produce frequencies that low and 2) the wavelength comes into play; speaker excursion can't deal with waveforms that long. There was also mention of guitar speaker cabinets being designed for mid-bass on up to around 5 kHz, the implication being that they likewise aren't designed or capable of reproducing frequencies that low. comes into play; |
#5
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Listed Specifications for Guitar Speaker Frequency Range
On Friday, April 19, 2019 at 5:07:35 PM UTC-5, Scott Dorsey wrote:
The listed "frequency range" is most often denoting that the marketing department pulled a number out of their butt and that the manufacturer does not take you seriously. If you see a "frequency response" with tolerances, such as 70-5000Hz +/-3dB, you know the frequency will stay within those tolerances over that range at full rated power. Outside of that range you probably get output but you don't know what it will be. If a frequency range is given without tolerances it is meaningless except in that it tells you to avoid a vendor who gives fake numbers. In your experience, would a guitar speaker (not bass guitar speaker) be capable of producing low frequencies around 40 Hz at any output? I ask because I was privy to a discussion where it was claimed that 1) they don't have the excursion needed to produce frequencies that low and 2) the wavelength comes into play; speaker excursion can't deal with waveforms that long. There was also mention of guitar speaker cabinets being designed for mid-bass on up to around 5 kHz, the implication being that they likewise aren't designed or capable of reproducing frequencies that low. |
#6
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Listed Specifications for Guitar Speaker Frequency Range
James Price wrote:
When viewing general specifications for guitar speakers, the frequency response curve often displays a larger frequency range than what's listed under the "Frequency Range". If the listed frequency range is 70-5000Hz, yet the frequency response curve shows activity below 70 Hz, is the speaker audibly reproducing the extended lower range in the plot? If so, what is the listed "Frequency Range" actually denoting? ** The term "frequency range" refers to the USEABLE range of frequencies the speaker will produce when used as a guitar speaker. The response curve will normally show a wider range than this as it includes frequencies outside the usable range. Although there is no hard and fast rule, a level 10dB below the mid frequency output is no longer considered "useable". ..... Phil |
#7
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Listed Specifications for Guitar Speaker Frequency Range
James Price wrote:
In your experience, would a guitar speaker (not bass guitar speaker) be capable of producing low frequencies around 40 Hz at any output? ** Of course, but not at the high sound pressures available at higher frequencies. I often test combo amplifiers by applying a 40Hz sine wave to the input to reveal the existence or otherwise of buzzing and rattling noises from the speakers and cabinetry. Some clean sound at 40 Hz is audible at close range but not very loud. I ask because I was privy to a discussion where it was claimed that 1) they don't have the excursion needed to produce frequencies that low and 2) the wavelength comes into play; speaker excursion can't deal with waveforms that long. ** Both claims are false. There was also mention of guitar speaker cabinets being designed for mid-bass on up to around 5 kHz, the implication being that they likewise aren't designed or capable of reproducing frequencies that low. ** Guitar speaker cabinets are mostly open backed, imposing a strict low frequency limit depending on the dimensions. The larger examples reproduce well down to about 60Hz. Closed backed cabinets may do better or worse, depending on the actual drivers in use and the existence or not of porting. It is true that guitar speakers have limited cone excursions ( compared to hi-fi woofers), but this is made upfor by having large cones areas and the use of multiple drivers in cabinets. ..... Phil |
#8
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Listed Specifications for Guitar Speaker Frequency Range
On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 12:41:40 -0700 (PDT), James Price
wrote: When viewing general specifications for guitar speakers, the frequency response curve often displays a larger frequency range than what's listed under the "Frequency Range". If the listed frequency range is 70-5000Hz, yet the frequency response curve shows activity below 70 Hz, is the speaker audibly reproducing the extended lower range in the plot? If so, what is the listed "Frequency Range" actually denoting? Guitar speakers don't reproduce guitar sounds, they produce them. So don't even think about curves, you need to listen to the speaker as an integral part of the guitar - which comprises the guitar itself, plus cables, pedals, amp and speakers. That is the only meaningful information you can get about a guitar speaker. d |
#9
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Listed Specifications for Guitar Speaker Frequency Range
On 20/04/2019 7:41 am, Mike Rivers wrote:
On 4/19/2019 3:41 PM, James Price wrote: When viewing general specifications for guitar speakers, the frequency response curve often displays a larger frequency range than what's listed under the "Frequency Range". If the listed frequency range is 70-5000Hz, yet the frequency response curve shows activity below 70 Hz, is the speaker audibly reproducing the extended lower range in the plot? If so, what is the listed "Frequency Range" actually denoting? The frequency response plots, as well as the operating characteristics, come from the marketing department, not the engineering department. Sure, the speaker will reproduce something below 70 Hz, but as a guitar player, you probably don't need it. What they want you to believe is that it will do a good job as a guitar amplifier speaker, which, hopefully, is why you're buying it. The raw stated or plotted frequency response of a loudspeaker is more theoretical than practical, since in the real world, it's a function of the amplifier, the enclosure, and even the wiring between the amplifier and speaker voice coil. You forgot the main thing. The response figure quoted is a function of what you specify as the limits for acoustic output. Most speakers will reproduce down to 20 Hz in no enclosure at all. Of course the output will be so low that you cant hear it or feel it! You may be able to measure it though. Now that marketing dept can select any dB limit they like for the frequency range, so when they do actually show a plot (not very often unfortunately) you have far more information to work with. You still don't know how accurate the plot is of course! :-( And it will certainly be different in your enclosure and room in any case. |
#10
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Listed Specifications for Guitar Speaker Frequency Range
On 20/04/2019 8:07 am, Scott Dorsey wrote:
James Price wrote: When viewing general specifications for guitar speakers, the frequency resp= onse curve often displays a larger frequency range than what's listed under= the "Frequency Range". If the listed frequency range is 70-5000Hz, yet the= frequency response curve shows activity below 70 Hz, is the speaker audibl= y reproducing the extended lower range in the plot? If so, what is the list= ed "Frequency Range" actually denoting? The listed "frequency range" is most often denoting that the marketing department pulled a number out of their butt and that the manufacturer does not take you seriously. If you see a "frequency response" with tolerances, such as 70-5000Hz +/-3dB, you know the frequency will stay within those tolerances over that range at full rated power. No you don't. You know that is what the manufacturer suggests might be the case in some circumstances. Or not. But a frequency response is NOT the same as a full power output response in any case. A really reputable manufacturer might provide both, but that's pretty rare IME. Outside of that range you probably get output but you don't know what it will be. Yep, you have even less idea what it will be! |
#11
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Listed Specifications for Guitar Speaker Frequency Range
On 20/04/2019 8:31 am, James Price wrote:
On Friday, April 19, 2019 at 5:07:35 PM UTC-5, Scott Dorsey wrote: The listed "frequency range" is most often denoting that the marketing department pulled a number out of their butt and that the manufacturer does not take you seriously. If you see a "frequency response" with tolerances, such as 70-5000Hz +/-3dB, you know the frequency will stay within those tolerances over that range at full rated power. Outside of that range you probably get output but you don't know what it will be. If a frequency range is given without tolerances it is meaningless except in that it tells you to avoid a vendor who gives fake numbers. In your experience, would a guitar speaker (not bass guitar speaker) be capable of producing low frequencies around 40 Hz at any output? I ask because I was privy to a discussion where it was claimed that 1) they don't have the excursion needed to produce frequencies that low and 2) the wavelength comes into play; speaker excursion can't deal with waveforms that long. There was also mention of guitar speaker cabinets being designed for mid-bass on up to around 5 kHz, the implication being that they likewise aren't designed or capable of reproducing frequencies that low. Almost ANY speaker can reproduce 20Hz. Almost none can do it at a level you can hear or feel. The excursion is NOT simply a matter of frequency, but frequency AND input power. At *very low* power levels there is no problem with almost any LF speaker following a 20 Hz waveform, but the SPL output may be low to unmeasureable! Your discussion friends simply didn't understand all the variables. |
#12
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Listed Specifications for Guitar Speaker Frequency Range
On 20/04/2019 4:42 pm, Don Pearce wrote:
On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 12:41:40 -0700 (PDT), James Price wrote: When viewing general specifications for guitar speakers, the frequency response curve often displays a larger frequency range than what's listed under the "Frequency Range". If the listed frequency range is 70-5000Hz, yet the frequency response curve shows activity below 70 Hz, is the speaker audibly reproducing the extended lower range in the plot? If so, what is the listed "Frequency Range" actually denoting? Guitar speakers don't reproduce guitar sounds, they produce them. So don't even think about curves, you need to listen to the speaker as an integral part of the guitar - which comprises the guitar itself, plus cables, pedals, amp and speakers. That is the only meaningful information you can get about a guitar speaker. HaHa, you're suggesting that every time a guitarist changes his guitar or pedals he should change his speaker! :-) A good music instrument speaker is still one which has a good response over the range you require, and *most* importantly has the acoustic output you require! The sound type you require can be better achieved through the guitar, amplifier and signal modifiers IMO. (Not a believer in using crappy leads to change the sound either for that matter) |
#13
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Listed Specifications for Guitar Speaker Frequency Range
Trevor wrote:
The frequency response plots, as well as the operating characteristics, come from the marketing department, not the engineering department. Sure, the speaker will reproduce something below 70 Hz, but as a guitar player, you probably don't need it. What they want you to believe is that it will do a good job as a guitar amplifier speaker, which, hopefully, is why you're buying it. The raw stated or plotted frequency response of a loudspeaker is more theoretical than practical, since in the real world, it's a function of the amplifier, the enclosure, and even the wiring between the amplifier and speaker voice coil. You forgot the main thing. The response figure quoted is a function of what you specify as the limits for acoustic output. ** The OP is talking about *guitar* speakers, not speaker systems, specified as drivers. They are a special case, separate from hi-fi speakers. See typical example, with plot as well as numbers. https://celestion.com/product/22/seventy_80/ Note how the " -10dB rule " applies when deriving numbers from the response plot. The plot is obtained with the driver mounted on a large baffle or large volume cabinet and driven with constant voltage input. In typical use, the speaker or multiple speakers are mounted in an open backed cabinet of modest dimensions and driven with a amplifier that has a high output impedance - anywhere between 8 and 100 ohms. This can dramatically change the response from the published curve. Still, it is useful for making comparisons between various models. ...... Phil |
#14
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Listed Specifications for Guitar Speaker Frequency Range
On Sun, 21 Apr 2019 13:22:29 +1000, Trevor wrote:
On 20/04/2019 4:42 pm, Don Pearce wrote: On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 12:41:40 -0700 (PDT), James Price wrote: When viewing general specifications for guitar speakers, the frequency response curve often displays a larger frequency range than what's listed under the "Frequency Range". If the listed frequency range is 70-5000Hz, yet the frequency response curve shows activity below 70 Hz, is the speaker audibly reproducing the extended lower range in the plot? If so, what is the listed "Frequency Range" actually denoting? Guitar speakers don't reproduce guitar sounds, they produce them. So don't even think about curves, you need to listen to the speaker as an integral part of the guitar - which comprises the guitar itself, plus cables, pedals, amp and speakers. That is the only meaningful information you can get about a guitar speaker. HaHa, you're suggesting that every time a guitarist changes his guitar or pedals he should change his speaker! :-) A good music instrument speaker is still one which has a good response over the range you require, and *most* importantly has the acoustic output you require! The sound type you require can be better achieved through the guitar, amplifier and signal modifiers IMO. (Not a believer in using crappy leads to change the sound either for that matter) How on earth did you derive that from what I said? I said that a guitar speaker is an integral part of the electric guitar system and can't be considered in isolation. d |
#15
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Listed Specifications for Guitar Speaker Frequency Range
James Price wrote:
In your experience, would a guitar speaker (not bass guitar speaker) be capable of producing low frequencies around 40 Hz at any output? I ask because I was privy to a discussion where it was claimed that 1) they don't have the excursion needed to produce frequencies that low and 2) the wavelength comes into play; speaker excursion can't deal with waveforms that long. There was also mention of guitar speaker cabinets being designed for mid-bass on up to around 5 kHz, the implication being that they likewise aren't designed or capable of reproducing frequencies that low. If you put a 40 Hz sine into a typical guitar speaker with an open-backed guitar cabinet, you will get a lot of sound out. A very tiny bit of that will be at 40 Hz and most of it will be at higher frequencies resulting from the cone breakup. The high cabinet tuning and speaker breakup are where a lot of the sound of the amp come from. Open E string on a guitar is only 83Hz anyway... why design a cabinet for use below the lowest frequency you can play? --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#16
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Listed Specifications for Guitar Speaker Frequency Range
On 4/20/2019 11:00 PM, Trevor wrote:
You forgot the main thing. The response figure quoted is a function of what you specify as the limits for acoustic output. Most speakers will reproduce down to 20 Hz in no enclosure at all. Of course the output will be so low that you cant hear it or feel it! I thought everybody knew that "unspecified" frequency response of anything was nothing but marketing fluff. E-V made a 30" woofer at one time, and I knew of a bass player who had one built into a cabinet for his bass. He said that, as far as sounding like a musical instrument goes, his Ampeg cabinet with six or eight speakers sounded better overall, but he just _wanted_ to have a bigger speaker than anyone else. And this was even before Spinal Tap. -- For a good time, call http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com |
#17
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Listed Specifications for Guitar Speaker Frequency Range
In article , Mike Rivers wrote:
I thought everybody knew that "unspecified" frequency response of anything was nothing but marketing fluff. E-V made a 30" woofer at one time, and I knew of a bass player who had one built into a cabinet for his bass. He said that, as far as sounding like a musical instrument goes, his Ampeg cabinet with six or eight speakers sounded better overall, but he just _wanted_ to have a bigger speaker than anyone else. And this was even before Spinal Tap. The 30W was an interesting beast. Back then, voice coils and suspensions did not allow a very wide xmax, so if you wanted to move a lot of air you needed a lot of area. The T-S math hadn't been worked out back then, either, so cabinet tuning was more or less trial and error and nobody really had a grip on driver Q. So, by the standards of modern bass drivers it was pretty crappy. But, if you wanted a box that could move air at 20 Hz, you could do it with a 30W in a huge sealed cabinet, like they did for the Sensurround system. Want to put it in a small cabinet to carry around with your bass guitar, you are going to find the Vas is not appropriate for the application. And anyway, the lowest string on the bass guitar is what... 65 Hz or so? No need for extension much below that.... but a serious need for flat response in the octave above it. But it -was- really big, and popular with people who were compensating for insufficient genital size. It's a wonder that something like that is not being made today for the car audio industry. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#18
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Listed Specifications for Guitar Speaker Frequency Range
Scott Dorsey wrote:
In article , Mike Rivers wrote: I thought everybody knew that "unspecified" frequency response of anything was nothing but marketing fluff. E-V made a 30" woofer at one time, and I knew of a bass player who had one built into a cabinet for his bass. He said that, as far as sounding like a musical instrument goes, his Ampeg cabinet with six or eight speakers sounded better overall, but he just _wanted_ to have a bigger speaker than anyone else. And this was even before Spinal Tap. The 30W was an interesting beast. Back then, voice coils and suspensions did not allow a very wide xmax, so if you wanted to move a lot of air you needed a lot of area. The T-S math hadn't been worked out back then, either, so cabinet tuning was more or less trial and error and nobody really had a grip on driver Q. So, by the standards of modern bass drivers it was pretty crappy. But, if you wanted a box that could move air at 20 Hz, you could do it with a 30W in a huge sealed cabinet, like they did for the Sensurround system. Want to put it in a small cabinet to carry around with your bass guitar, you are going to find the Vas is not appropriate for the application. And anyway, the lowest string on the bass guitar is what... 65 Hz or so? You're thinking cello. Bass goes down to 41.something. But yeah, it's far from 20. -- Matt |
#19
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Listed Specifications for Guitar Speaker Frequency Range
On Sun, 21 Apr 2019 17:04:36 -0000 (UTC), Matt Faunce wrote:
Scott Dorsey wrote: In article , Mike Rivers wrote: I thought everybody knew that "unspecified" frequency response of anything was nothing but marketing fluff. E-V made a 30" woofer at one time, and I knew of a bass player who had one built into a cabinet for his bass. He said that, as far as sounding like a musical instrument goes, his Ampeg cabinet with six or eight speakers sounded better overall, but he just _wanted_ to have a bigger speaker than anyone else. And this was even before Spinal Tap. The 30W was an interesting beast. Back then, voice coils and suspensions did not allow a very wide xmax, so if you wanted to move a lot of air you needed a lot of area. The T-S math hadn't been worked out back then, either, so cabinet tuning was more or less trial and error and nobody really had a grip on driver Q. So, by the standards of modern bass drivers it was pretty crappy. But, if you wanted a box that could move air at 20 Hz, you could do it with a 30W in a huge sealed cabinet, like they did for the Sensurround system. Want to put it in a small cabinet to carry around with your bass guitar, you are going to find the Vas is not appropriate for the application. And anyway, the lowest string on the bass guitar is what... 65 Hz or so? You're thinking cello. Bass goes down to 41.something. But yeah, it's far from 20. A 5-string bass' B string is almost 31 Hz, so much closer to 20 Hz. 31 Hz is even for real HiFi a challenge. The Celestion data from another response shows the high sensitivity (98 dB or so), but they don't specify how it is measured. If the SPL is measured at 2.84 Volts, then the sensitivity will be less for the 16 Ohm version. And they don't show the waterfall spectrum which shows resonances. But that might be only important for HiFi. Mat Nieuwenhoven |
#20
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Listed Specifications for Guitar Speaker Frequency Range
Mat Nieuwenhoven wrote:
The Celestion data from another response shows the high sensitivity (98 dB or so), but they don't specify how it is measured. ** Usually with pink noise limited to a particular bandwidth - generally the mid band - but others include the high frequency peak in the measurement to get an extra couple dB. If the SPL is measured at 2.84 Volts, then the sensitivity will be less for the 16 Ohm version. ** The spec is for so many dBs *per applied watt* at 1 metre. For an 8ohm speaker this equates to 2.83V rms and for a 16 ohm model 4.0V rms. Sometimes the makers will use 100mW for their tests as SPLs of 98dB and over are *very* loud. And they don't show the waterfall spectrum which shows resonances. ** Be a beautiful sight, full of glorious resonances. But that might be only important for HiFi. ** Eee yup. ...... Phil |
#21
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Listed Specifications for Guitar Speaker Frequency Range
On 4/21/2019 3:15 PM, Mat Nieuwenhoven wrote:
The Celestion data from another response shows the high sensitivity (98 dB or so), but they don't specify how it is measured. If the SPL is measured at 2.84 Volts, then the sensitivity will be less for the 16 Ohm version. And they don't show the waterfall spectrum which shows resonances. But that might be only important for HiFi. As I said, published specifications for loudspeakers, and in fact, for most audio products, aren't worth the paper they're printed on (or the cost of sending data to your computer). They're for people who don't understand them, to make useless comparisons between similar products. -- For a good time, call http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com |
#22
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Listed Specifications for Guitar Speaker Frequency Range
Mike Rivers wrote:
Mat Nieuwenhoven wrote: The Celestion data from another response shows the high sensitivity (98 dB or so), but they don't specify how it is measured. If the SPL is measured at 2.84 Volts, then the sensitivity will be less for the 16 Ohm version. And they don't show the waterfall spectrum which shows resonances. But that might be only important for HiFi. As I said, published specifications for loudspeakers, and in fact, for most audio products, aren't worth the paper they're printed on ** That is complete bull****. I have spent a great deal of time in my so far 46 year career testing and verifying makers specs for audio equipment ( including speakers ) and find very little to complain about. Mike has never done any such thing and is merely blowing one of his wacky prejudices out his arse. ..... Phil |
#23
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Listed Specifications for Guitar Speaker Frequency Range
On 22/04/2019 12:33 AM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
And anyway, the lowest string on the bass guitar is what... 65 Hz or so? No need for extension much below that.... but a serious need for flat response in the octave above it. The (reasonably common) 5-string basses have a low-B fundamental of approx 31Hz. I have a 4x10" Acme Low-B4 cabinet that has useful output at that frequency. (And the stressed-ply cabinet gives and amazingly quiet 'donk' when you rap it with knuckles, unlike many other similarly purposed cabinets that sound more like a cornflake box. But that's all bye-the-bye ....) Lower frequencies are also beneficial for some styles of bass playing that include percussive slapping effects. Not to mention bass synths ... But it -was- really big, and popular with people who were compensating for insufficient genital size. It's a wonder that something like that is not being made today for the car audio industry. Also larger cones more difficult to avoid cone breakup distortion when trying to push at higher levels and/or higher frequencies. geoff |
#24
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Listed Specifications for Guitar Speaker Frequency Range
On 22/04/2019 7:15 AM, Mat Nieuwenhoven wrote:
You're thinking cello. Bass goes down to 41.something. But yeah, it's far from 20. A 5-string bass' B string is almost 31 Hz, so much closer to 20 Hz. 31 Hz is even for real HiFi a challenge. My KEF Reference R107s (with necessary KUBE box in the chain) can go reasonably loud (and flat) down to 20Hz, and lower with level and linearity trade-offs. And does it make a difference on material that does include LF content ? Hell yes. Who needs a sub ;- ) geoff |
#25
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Listed Specifications for Guitar Speaker Frequency Range
On 21/04/2019 4:03 pm, Don Pearce wrote:
On Sun, 21 Apr 2019 13:22:29 +1000, Trevor wrote: On 20/04/2019 4:42 pm, Don Pearce wrote: On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 12:41:40 -0700 (PDT), James Price wrote: When viewing general specifications for guitar speakers, the frequency response curve often displays a larger frequency range than what's listed under the "Frequency Range". If the listed frequency range is 70-5000Hz, yet the frequency response curve shows activity below 70 Hz, is the speaker audibly reproducing the extended lower range in the plot? If so, what is the listed "Frequency Range" actually denoting? Guitar speakers don't reproduce guitar sounds, they produce them. So don't even think about curves, you need to listen to the speaker as an integral part of the guitar - which comprises the guitar itself, plus cables, pedals, amp and speakers. That is the only meaningful information you can get about a guitar speaker. HaHa, you're suggesting that every time a guitarist changes his guitar or pedals he should change his speaker! :-) A good music instrument speaker is still one which has a good response over the range you require, and *most* importantly has the acoustic output you require! The sound type you require can be better achieved through the guitar, amplifier and signal modifiers IMO. (Not a believer in using crappy leads to change the sound either for that matter) How on earth did you derive that from what I said? I said that a guitar speaker is an integral part of the electric guitar system and can't be considered in isolation. Yep, and I said *I* DON'T consider the speaker part of the "guitar itself" or cables and pedals, that's all. |
#26
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Listed Specifications for Guitar Speaker Frequency Range
On 21/04/2019 9:49 pm, Mike Rivers wrote:
On 4/20/2019 11:00 PM, Trevor wrote: You forgot the main thing. The response figure quoted is a function of what you specify as the limits for acoustic output. Most speakers will reproduce down to 20 Hz in no enclosure at all. Of course the output will be so low that you cant hear it or feel it! I thought everybody knew that "unspecified" frequency response of anything was nothing but marketing fluff. Yeah you'd think, but apparently not everybody. |
#27
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Listed Specifications for Guitar Speaker Frequency Range
On 21/04/2019 3:13 PM, Trevor wrote:
.. Almost ANY speaker can reproduce 20Hz. Almost none can do it at a level you can hear or feel. The excursion is NOT simply a matter of frequency, but frequency AND input power. At *very low* power levels there is no problem with almost any LF speaker following a 20 Hz waveform, but the SPL output may be low to unmeasureable! Your discussion friends simply didn't understand all the variables. I know we are getting pretty far away from 'guitar speakers' here, but it's fun. You want to feel (and hear) some great bass if that tickles your fancy, try Sting 'A Thousand Years', Supertramp "You Win, I Lose', Nora Jones "Turn Me On', or even Beatles 'Mother Nature's Son' (esp. 2009 remastered version). Sad that most people never even realise it is there. geoff |
#28
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Listed Specifications for Guitar Speaker Frequency Range
On 21/04/2019 11:04 PM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
Open E string on a guitar is only 83Hz anyway... why design a cabinet for use below the lowest frequency you can play? --scott Intermodulation products / beats (frequency version) perhaps ? geoff |
#29
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Listed Specifications for Guitar Speaker Frequency Range
|
#30
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Listed Specifications for Guitar Speaker Frequency Range
On 22/04/2019 08:03, Don Pearce wrote:
Particularly with pink noise, they have no choice but to apply a voltage - which is what amplifiers generate. The actual amount of power that results in is something the speaker has to negotiate with a deity, cos it certainly isn't negotiable with any human. When they talk about 1 watt, they are just assuming a nominal impedance, which for any particular driver over an extended bandwidth is a fiction. Electrically... True RMS current meters are cheaply available,as long as you stick to audio frequencies. RF ones cost a bit more.... One that I use doesn't even need to be electrically connected to the unit, as it uses a hall effect sensor to check the current in one of the speaker wires. It works over the whole audio range. That and a decent voltmeter along with a sweep tone generator can be used to draw a graph of impedance against frequency, though to be accurate, you need to use an oscilloscope t and a couple of low value resistors in the circuit to detect any frequency dependent phase shifts in the load, or use a hall effect sensor to generate a voltage to drive the X plates on the 'scope. If you have a DAW, then you have a way to generate a sine or pink tone good enough for the job, even using a free DAW program such as Audacity. The only reasons the makers don't do it, as far as I can tell, are that it is time consuming, there is a lot of variation between speakers as they come off the line, and then there is the problem of getting an accurate enough microphone to check the physical response. -- Tciao for Now! John. |
#31
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Listed Specifications for Guitar Speaker Frequency Range
On 22/04/2019 10:54, John Williamson wrote:
That and a decent voltmeter along with a sweep tone generator can be used to draw a graph of impedance against frequency, though to be accurate, you need to use an oscilloscope and a couple of low value resistors in the circuit to detect any frequency dependent phase shifts in the load, or use a hall effect sensor to generate a voltage to drive the X plates on the 'scope. If you have a DAW, then you have a way to generate a sine or pink tone good enough for the job, even using a free DAW program such as Audacity. Sorry, finger trouble, The X plates are drive by the voltage, and the Y plates by a voltage derived from the current, in the same way as the stereo imaging displays are by the left and right channels. -- Tciao for Now! John. |
#32
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Listed Specifications for Guitar Speaker Frequency Range
On Mon, 22 Apr 2019 10:54:35 +0100, John Williamson
wrote: On 22/04/2019 08:03, Don Pearce wrote: Particularly with pink noise, they have no choice but to apply a voltage - which is what amplifiers generate. The actual amount of power that results in is something the speaker has to negotiate with a deity, cos it certainly isn't negotiable with any human. When they talk about 1 watt, they are just assuming a nominal impedance, which for any particular driver over an extended bandwidth is a fiction. Electrically... True RMS current meters are cheaply available,as long as you stick to audio frequencies. RF ones cost a bit more.... One that I use doesn't even need to be electrically connected to the unit, as it uses a hall effect sensor to check the current in one of the speaker wires. It works over the whole audio range. That and a decent voltmeter along with a sweep tone generator can be used to draw a graph of impedance against frequency, though to be accurate, you need to use an oscilloscope t and a couple of low value resistors in the circuit to detect any frequency dependent phase shifts in the load, or use a hall effect sensor to generate a voltage to drive the X plates on the 'scope. If you have a DAW, then you have a way to generate a sine or pink tone good enough for the job, even using a free DAW program such as Audacity. The only reasons the makers don't do it, as far as I can tell, are that it is time consuming, there is a lot of variation between speakers as they come off the line, and then there is the problem of getting an accurate enough microphone to check the physical response. A true RMS current meter doesn't help, unfortunately. A speaker's impedance is very reactive so multiplying RMS current and voltage doesn't give you power. That would need some sort of measurement system that could provide vector products. As for doing that with a noise source, forget it. You need single frequency sine waves for that calculation. So no, you can't measure pink noise power into a speaker. Just supply it a known voltage is the best you can do. d |
#33
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Listed Specifications for Guitar Speaker Frequency Range
In article ,
wrote: Mat Nieuwenhoven wrote: And they don't show the waterfall spectrum which shows resonances. ** Be a beautiful sight, full of glorious resonances. But that might be only important for HiFi. ** Eee yup. Might be useful too if you want to know what it sounds like on guitar. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#34
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Listed Specifications for Guitar Speaker Frequency Range
In article ,
wrote: ** That is complete bull****. I have spent a great deal of time in my so far 46 year career testing and verifying makers specs for audio equipment ( including speakers ) and find very little to complain about. Then why do we keep seeing frequency ranges without tolerances? And why will you never see a distortion spec on a loudspeaker? --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#35
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Listed Specifications for Guitar Speaker Frequency Range
In article , Trevor wrote:
Yep, and I said *I* DON'T consider the speaker part of the "guitar itself" or cables and pedals, that's all. Why not? The amplifier is clipping, the speaker is breaking up, the cabinet is deliberately designed to limit bandwidth. Not only that, the output of the amp at high levels is looping back into the guitar pickups, causing the system to ring. The amplifier/speaker is half the system and is likely more a source of "tone" than the instrument itself. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#36
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Listed Specifications for Guitar Speaker Frequency Range
On Mon, 22 Apr 2019 10:54:35 +0100, John Williamson wrote:
On 22/04/2019 08:03, Don Pearce wrote: Particularly with pink noise, they have no choice but to apply a voltage - which is what amplifiers generate. The actual amount of power that results in is something the speaker has to negotiate with a deity, cos it certainly isn't negotiable with any human. When they talk about 1 watt, they are just assuming a nominal impedance, which for any particular driver over an extended bandwidth is a fiction. Electrically... True RMS current meters are cheaply available,as long as you stick to audio frequencies. RF ones cost a bit more.... One that I use doesn't even need to be electrically connected to the unit, as it uses a hall effect sensor to check the current in one of the speaker wires. It works over the whole audio range. That and a decent voltmeter along with a sweep tone generator can be used to draw a graph of impedance against frequency, though to be accurate, you need to use an oscilloscope t and a couple of low value resistors in the circuit to detect any frequency dependent phase shifts in the load, or use a hall effect sensor to generate a voltage to drive the X plates on the 'scope. If you have a DAW, then you have a way to generate a sine or pink tone good enough for the job, even using a free DAW program such as Audacity. The only reasons the makers don't do it, as far as I can tell, are that it is time consuming, there is a lot of variation between speakers as they come off the line, and then there is the problem of getting an accurate enough microphone to check the physical response. I don't think many people measure speakers like that. There is good software for it, like Arta from http://www.artalabs.hr/ . Takes a fraction of the time and gives much more info. You do need a more or less calibrated (known characteristic) microphone. It measure both loudspeaker impedance and phase, and als can do complete speakers, not single speaker units. I've no relation to that company or product, other than having used it myself. Mat Nieuwenhoven |
#37
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Listed Specifications for Guitar Speaker Frequency Range
On 22 Apr 2019 08:29:34 -0400, Scott Dorsey wrote:
In article , wrote: ** That is complete bull****. I have spent a great deal of time in my so far 46 year career testing and verifying makers specs for audio equipment ( including speakers ) and find very little to complain about. Then why do we keep seeing frequency ranges without tolerances? And why will you never see a distortion spec on a loudspeaker? I subscribe to a build-your-own-speaker-boxes magazine, and that does publish impedance curves, distortion, waterfall spectrum, and horizontal radiation pattern. It has its own measuring room. Most designs are for HiFi, some for PA. Distortion can indeed be a problem. At the lowest frequencies (200 hz) it goes up, at the higher ones it can be low if the the poles are copper-capped (which also shows in the impednce curves). The magazine measures it at 90 dB SPL at 1 meter, except for very small speaker units. Above 200 Hz, less than 0.3 % distortion is doable. Mat Nieuwenhoven |
#38
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Listed Specifications for Guitar Speaker Frequency Range
|
#39
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Listed Specifications for Guitar Speaker Frequency Range
On 4/22/2019 7:01 AM, Don Pearce wrote:
A true RMS current meter doesn't help, unfortunately. A speaker's impedance is very reactive so multiplying RMS current and voltage doesn't give you power. That would need some sort of measurement system that could provide vector products. As for doing that with a noise source, forget it. You need single frequency sine waves for that calculation. So no, you can't measure pink noise power into a speaker. Just supply it a known voltage is the best you can do. While this is way off the subject of a guitar amplifier speaker, Meyer Sound has created a new test signal that more accurately represents music, one with a crest factor that increases with frequency. While their goal using this test signal is ultimately to determine the maximum system SPL, and hence the system dynamic range and available headroom, it can be used for telling us what we can expect to hear from a given loudspeaker. https://m-noise.org/ -- For a good time, call http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com |
#40
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Listed Specifications for Guitar Speaker Frequency Range
On Mon, 22 Apr 2019 09:53:05 -0400, Mike Rivers
wrote: On 4/22/2019 7:01 AM, Don Pearce wrote: A true RMS current meter doesn't help, unfortunately. A speaker's impedance is very reactive so multiplying RMS current and voltage doesn't give you power. That would need some sort of measurement system that could provide vector products. As for doing that with a noise source, forget it. You need single frequency sine waves for that calculation. So no, you can't measure pink noise power into a speaker. Just supply it a known voltage is the best you can do. While this is way off the subject of a guitar amplifier speaker, Meyer Sound has created a new test signal that more accurately represents music, one with a crest factor that increases with frequency. While their goal using this test signal is ultimately to determine the maximum system SPL, and hence the system dynamic range and available headroom, it can be used for telling us what we can expect to hear from a given loudspeaker. https://m-noise.org/ OK, I see the crest factor - it makes it kind of crackly. But that pink noise covers 20Hz to 20k, which is not what you need for speaker sensitivity testing. d |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Frequency range of the voice | Pro Audio | |||
select frequency range | Pro Audio | |||
select frequency range | General | |||
Monitor Frequency Range | Pro Audio | |||
Monitor Frequency Range | Pro Audio |