Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#81
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
New Telefunken mics
"Soundhaspriority" wrote in message ... "Harry Lavo" wrote in message . .. "Arny Krueger" wrote in message . .. "Jenn" wrote in message Our recording program at the college just received two new mics and everyone is very excited. The new mics are great Telefunkens: http://www.telefunkenusa.com/product...tem=3&cat=mics http://www.telefunkenusa.com/product...tem=7&cat=mics Boutique items, for sure. Equipment like this does little commensurate with the expense to teach students about performing, recording and producing music in the real world. But hey, the new mics have tubes, a high price and a fancy name, and that must ring some deep-pocketed dilettante's bell! Ah, envy raises it's head in Arny's life once again. We will now be subjected to a month of off- and on- again posts about Behringer and Studio Project mics being are just as good, and why all mics above $400 are evil wastes of money.....especially those using....*gasp*.....tubes. I have several times considered buying a tube mike. I looked for web experiences of all the candidates under $1K, and was chastened by the highly mixed opinions. The Rode NT2000, which I'm very happy with, and which received excellent reviews, is also available in a tube version, and is notably one of the quietest tube mikes in existence. But sadly, the opinions seem split between praise and damnation. Ditto for the rest of the offerings, except that they are typically distinguished by excessive noise. So the tube does something much more than subtle to the sound, as does the transformer, if one is used (some tube mikes use bipolar direct coupled outputs.) I suspect that the Telefunkens work for some very specific voices, and perhaps, some instruments. High coloration is a way of life for pop music recordists, and knowing when to use these tools could be a great advantage. But I would expect that a cheap Behringer mike is more neutral. Bob Morein (310) 237-6511 More neutral in terms of frequency balance, perhaps, (if you are talking their instrumentation mic) but also noisier and with lower output. Almost all mics are designed for a purpose, Bob, as you well know. Presumably the telefunkens were purchased with an eye towards their appropriateness for a given use. But just as with amplifiers, tube mics tend to provide a three-dimensionality or "roundness" to the sound (higher second harmonic, perhaps) that transistor mics often do not....and their separate power supplies and preamps usually allow them to handle very loud sounds and to transmit signal back to the counsole/control room/DAW (whatever) with no hum or other extraneous noise. It is obviously an individual choice, as it is with almost any mic selection....there are pros and cons, but no rights or wrongs....except for a specific application. |
#82
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
New Telefunken mics
On 19 Apr, 15:25, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
I find it to be a lot of fun. Unfortunately, I'm going to miss out on one festival the week my daughter is getting married, for pretty obvious reasons. We'll know what week it is. You'll be in an especially snotty mood, having to pay for the whole affair |
#83
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
New Telefunken mics
On Apr 19, 7:36*pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" On Apr 19, 2:22 pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote: Who is Krooborg, George? What is his legal name? Do you even know it? The sane here know who it is. That leaves you out, ****R. Congratulations! You've now hit your 1,000,000th IKYABWAI regardless of the accounting system! Your prize awaits you! Just respond to this email with your bank account information and passwords and it will be remitted out of our accounts receivable budget immediately! Once again, congratulations! |
#84
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
New Telefunken mics
On Apr 19, 7:42*pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in On Apr 19, 12:37 pm, Jenn wrote: To be fair (I always get in trouble with Arny when I try to defend him, but fair is fair), his work with recording school ensembles would qualify as professional work, in my experience. At festivals, one of three situations is likely, in my experience (I judge a lot of these things): 1. The schools' pay a fee to enter the festival, and they receive a recording of their performance, paid for by that fee. 2. The festival picks up the cost of the recording. 3. The school can opt to get recorded or not, paying a separate fee to the recording people. In any event, the recording concern gets paid. Semi-professional might be a better description. Thta means something else. A "professional" makes their living doing something. There's not steady enough work doing festivals for anybody to make a living doing festivals. It is a seasonal business. Then it is not a "profession" and you are not therefore a "professional". But thanks ****R for sharing your ignorance of that fact, like all the other ignorant statements that you share. No? Oh. Another ignorant statement. I must have confused "part-time amateur" with "professional". I have an idea: let's ask JA if he's a professional editor who also does some recording, or if he's a professional recording engineer who sometimes does some writing, or what. That might indicate if you're a professional PC repairman who does some recording, or if you're a professional recording engineer who dabbles in PC repair. Here's a hint, GOIA: I've played hundreds of gigs in front of thousands of people in part-time bands. I do not call myself a "professional" musician. I would say that I'm a semi-professional at best, or more likely, an amateur musician who plays out. LOL! |
#85
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
New Telefunken mics
On Apr 19, 7:48*pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in On Apr 19, 2:26 pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote: It would be an interesting experiment to see how long it would take for RAO to turn into a decent place, were the Middiot's posse to just disappear, or perhaps tranform themselves in decent human beings. Since nobody seems to want audio any more and it is a dying industry, who would come? Typical of a numb-brain like yours ****R to think that just because audio is changing, it is dying. We can discuss MP3 playes all day long, GOIA. Which one sounds best to you? I think if you changed the group to rec.audio.opinion.MP3 it might work. Typical of a numb-brain like yours ****R to think that slight changes such as the use of MP3s is a sign that audio is dying. Echolalia is resurfacing, GOIA. You should look into that. You posted yourself that MP3 docking stations outsell all standard stereo gear. Clearly portability wins over sound. Why discuss standard audio gear? What docking stations do you prefer? What factory MP3 interfaces in automobiles do the best job IYO? Have you noticed something, GOIA? There are no newbies, no questions. Period. That is because you scared all the newbies away, ****R. I see. I don't recall ever replying to one with hostility. Could you bring that post (or posts) into the light, from the darkness of your insanity please? There. I asked nicely and everything. (BTW, Google won't lie to you. They do not exist. With one single exception I even left 2pid's audio- related posts alone.) So you lie. Yet again. What's new? These newbies have never heard of *the "posse". The childish antics of the Middiot's posse smacks newbies in the eye before they make their first post. So your contention is that if George's Posse (caps for the title of a group, GOIA) stopped posting, which of course assumes that such a group exists, newbies woiuld suddenly appear and ask all sorts of interesting questions. They would not do so on RAH-E, which has no such "posse". Another insane claim. |
#86
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
New Telefunken mics
Shhhh! said: So your contention is that if George's Posse (caps for the title of a group, GOIA) stopped posting, which of course assumes that such a group exists, newbies woiuld suddenly appear and ask all sorts of interesting questions. They would not do so on RAH-E, which has no such "posse". Interestingly, Krazy Krooger imagines various Normals are leading the charge to have him committed. First it was the illustrious Derrida. His reign over Turdborg lasted about three years, or approximately six times the length of his tenure on RAO. Next came Zippy, who played here for at least two years. Krooger didn't dwell on Zippy's posse-ing presumably because of the reason he left RAO. At various times, Krooger has accused Marc, John, Jennifer (not Martin, the other one), Leslie, Brian, and probably others of commanding the plots against him. Mr. **** only elevated me to the captaincy of the multitude of anti-Kroo konspiracies after everybody else left RAO alone. You, Mr. Shhhh, have been in Turdy's sights for quite a while, so don't be surprised if you become the alleged ringleader at some point. |
#87
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
New Telefunken mics
In article
, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: I would say that I'm a semi-professional at best, or more likely, an amateur musician who plays out. A fine thing to be. |
#88
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
New Telefunken mics
Jenn said: A fine thing to be. Jennn I'm starting, to beleeive Jen that, you don't want to earn your fare shair of debating trade, points Jnnen. |
#89
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
New Telefunken mics
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote in message So your contention is that if George's Posse stopped posting, newbies woiuld suddenly appear and ask all sorts of interesting questions. No, newbies and a few returning regulars would slowly appear and discuss audio. As you state it ****R, there is an excluded-middle. Far be it from you to make an fair statement. They would not do so on RAH-E, which has no such "posse". There's far more audio going on at RAHE than there is on RAO, by far. This is true, despite the inconvenience of being moderated. |
#90
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
The Krooborg shows how to wear a coat of **** in style
Arnii "Utmost in Fecality" Krooborg spasms erratically. There's far more audio going on at RAHE than there is on RAO, by far. Another major achievement in unintended irony for the Krooborg. Bravo, Turdy! BTW, I'm curious why you crawled back into RAH-E after they shunned you. A sane human being would laugh and turn his back. But not you. You couldn't wait to pound on the door, weeping and wailing pitifully, until the big bad moderators relented and took pity on your pathetic self. Please explain your behavior, Arnii. |
#91
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
The Krooborg shows how to wear a coat of **** in style
On Apr 20, 4:31*pm, George M. Middius
wrote: Arnii "Utmost in Fecality" Krooborg spasms erratically. There's far more audio going on at RAHE than there is on RAO, by far. * Another major achievement in unintended irony for the Krooborg. Bravo, Turdy! BTW, I'm curious why you crawled back into RAH-E after they shunned you. A sane human being would laugh and turn his back. But not you. You couldn't wait to pound on the door, weeping and wailing pitifully, until the big bad moderators relented and took pity on your pathetic self. Please explain your behavior, Arnii. It's not his coat of **** that's funny. It's the platform shoes. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: Telefunken preamp + pair of mics for DIY | Pro Audio | |||
telefunken tc600 mics | Pro Audio | |||
FA: Mint Telefunken U373a compressor, wired to XLR - also V672`s & mics... | Pro Audio | |||
FS AKG C12 and a pair of Telefunken/Schoeps 221b vintage tube mics | Pro Audio | |||
FA: nice pair of classic Telefunken/Schoeps M221b tube mics | Pro Audio |