Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1201   Report Post  
hank alrich
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hev wrote:

"hank alrich" wrote...
hev wrote:


Mature? It is a reality the industry has to face...


Let's look into this concept of yours: as long as I can get away with
stealing from you you have little problem with my thievery. If I can get
a huge number of folks to steal your goods from your store, you will
like it even better.


Makes perfect sense.


As much sense as comparing apples and oranges.


You cop out. You do not take resoonsibility for your actions. End of
story. Unless you're ready to love your own for-sale goods walking out
of your own store without you receiving any compensation at all you have
no valid logical basis from which to posit that your own favorite way of
stealing music is justifiable. This is apples to apples, so don't be
such a fruitcake about it.

--
ha
  #1202   Report Post  
Hev
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"hank alrich" wrote in message
.. .
Hev wrote:

"hank alrich" wrote...
hev wrote:


Mature? It is a reality the industry has to face...


Let's look into this concept of yours: as long as I can get away with
stealing from you you have little problem with my thievery. If I can
get
a huge number of folks to steal your goods from your store, you will
like it even better.


Makes perfect sense.


As much sense as comparing apples and oranges.


You cop out. You do not take resoonsibility for your actions. End of
story. Unless you're ready to love your own for-sale goods walking out
of your own store without you receiving any compensation at all you have
no valid logical basis from which to posit that your own favorite way of
stealing music is justifiable. This is apples to apples, so don't be
such a fruitcake about it.



People aren't making copies of my merchandise and sharing them. Apples and
oranges.

--

-Hev
remove your opinion to find me he
www.michaelYOURspringerOPINION.com


  #1203   Report Post  
David Morgan \(MAMS\)
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"hev" wrote in message news:YE0Yd.33232$uc.25665@trnddc09...
"David Morgan (MAMS)" wrote in message
news:zi0Yd.62811$EL5.37600@trnddc05...

"hev" wrote in message...

immature would be to just call them all thieves without adapting.



Immature would be saying that others must 'adapt' to breaking the law.



I guess you are still for prohibition then?



I'm not *that* old, hev....


  #1204   Report Post  
David Morgan \(MAMS\)
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Hev" wrote in message ...
"hank alrich" wrote in message
.. .
Hev wrote:

"hank alrich" wrote...
hev wrote:


Mature? It is a reality the industry has to face...


Let's look into this concept of yours: as long as I can get away with
stealing from you you have little problem with my thievery. If I can
get
a huge number of folks to steal your goods from your store, you will
like it even better.


Makes perfect sense.


As much sense as comparing apples and oranges.


You cop out. You do not take resoonsibility for your actions. End of
story. Unless you're ready to love your own for-sale goods walking out
of your own store without you receiving any compensation at all you have
no valid logical basis from which to posit that your own favorite way of
stealing music is justifiable. This is apples to apples, so don't be
such a fruitcake about it.



People aren't making copies of my merchandise and sharing them. Apples and
oranges.



VERY weak... I won't even buy it long enough to ask if you design and
manufacture all of your product line. There are probably plenty of copies
of all of your product out there in other retail stores... just as with CDs.

Now you're definitely trying to play apples against oranges. VERY weak
indeed....

We're talking about physically STEALING from you, in the same sense
that when you download from a P2P - someone first stole the product
to place it there, and if you take it you are complicit... and if you put it
there, you ARE the thief... the same kind of thief that has the keys to
your stores and opens them up for all of their friends to take what they
want without paying you or your distributors & vendors.




  #1206   Report Post  
reddred
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Hev" wrote in message
...

"hank alrich" wrote in message
.. .
hev wrote:

Mature? It is a reality the industry has to face...


Let's look into this concept of yours: as long as I can get away with
stealing from you you have little problem with my thievery. If I can get
a huge number of folks to steal your goods from your store, you will
like it even better.

Makes perfect sense.



As much sense as comparing apples and oranges.


How? IP isn't property? It says 'Property' right there in the name.

jb



  #1207   Report Post  
John
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 3/10/05 8:01 PM, in article 966Yd.87684$wc.52668@trnddc07, "David Morgan
(MAMS)" wrote:


"Hev" wrote in message
...
"hank alrich" wrote in message
.. .
Hev wrote:

"hank alrich" wrote...
hev wrote:

Mature? It is a reality the industry has to face...

Let's look into this concept of yours: as long as I can get away with
stealing from you you have little problem with my thievery. If I can
get
a huge number of folks to steal your goods from your store, you will
like it even better.

Makes perfect sense.

As much sense as comparing apples and oranges.

You cop out. You do not take resoonsibility for your actions. End of
story. Unless you're ready to love your own for-sale goods walking out
of your own store without you receiving any compensation at all you have
no valid logical basis from which to posit that your own favorite way of
stealing music is justifiable. This is apples to apples, so don't be
such a fruitcake about it.



People aren't making copies of my merchandise and sharing them. Apples and
oranges.



VERY weak... I won't even buy it long enough to ask if you design and
manufacture all of your product line. There are probably plenty of copies
of all of your product out there in other retail stores... just as with CDs.

Now you're definitely trying to play apples against oranges. VERY weak
indeed....

We're talking about physically STEALING from you, in the same sense
that when you download from a P2P - someone first stole the product
to place it there, and if you take it you are complicit... and if you put it
there, you ARE the thief... the same kind of thief that has the keys to
your stores and opens them up for all of their friends to take what they
want without paying you or your distributors & vendors.


More simpler:
The artist put copies of the work out there with the explicit contract of
"get a copy: pay for a copy". Thus every copy, not expressly given away, out
there NOT paid for is the real $$ amount of a copy out of the pocket of the
artist. And indeed remember that you don;t OWN the music, you merely have
bought the RIGHT to enjoy the use and convienience of the ONE copy you paid
for. If there's any way to use it in 2 places at once, you're cheating.

  #1208   Report Post  
Hev
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"David Morgan (MAMS)" wrote in message
news:Sr5Yd.87485$wc.10632@trnddc07...

"hev" wrote in message
news:YE0Yd.33232$uc.25665@trnddc09...
"David Morgan (MAMS)" wrote in message
news:zi0Yd.62811$EL5.37600@trnddc05...

"hev" wrote in message...

immature would be to just call them all thieves without adapting.


Immature would be saying that others must 'adapt' to breaking the law.



I guess you are still for prohibition then?



I'm not *that* old, hev....



;-)


Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:13 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"