Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
6SH7 vs. 6SJ7 for an audio high gain stage
6SH7 vs. 6SJ7 for an audio high gain stage (mic/phono)
I was messing about changing 6SJ7's for 6SH7's just for fun... and because I had just got some nice looking NOS mil. spec. glass ones. Then I found this... One of my tube data books says that the 6SH7 is not good for high gain audio use as it may induce 60 Hz hum. I decide to check this with a Heathkit A-8A amplifier to hand. It has a 6SJ7 mic/phono preamp stage in which I tried various 6SJ7 and 6SH7 substitutes while measuring the hum on the speaker output. Of course, it's not a rigorous test as other noise is in the output, too, and I did not optimize the preamp circuit for the two dissimilar tubes. The preamp circuit was as follows: Rk = 1K, Rp = 100K, Rg2 = 470K, B+ 185VDC. g1 shorted to ground (for test.) Heater winding CT to ground. 2nd AF tube after the volume control and inside the NFB loop was a metal 6SJ7 for all tests. Hum was measured with a Heathkit VTVM but you could use any multimeter on the AC range. Output voltage was measure across a speaker load (not at AF tube plate) with Bass control at maximum boost and Volume at maximum (but NOT while changing tubes!) In all, just a Q&D relative test. Results (I hope the table holds up! If not, I'll re-post more clearly somehow...) The 6SH7's Envelope Manufacturer Hum voltage (mV rms), approx National Union Glass NOS, mil.spec. 300 " " 600 " " 230 " " 300 " " 450 " " 300 " " 380 " " 330 " " 400 Glass 6SH7 average 365 mV Metal Not noted 70 " Not noted 70 " RCA 200 " GE 100 Metal 6SH7 average 110 mV The 6SJ7's Glass Sylvania 150 " Sylvania 100 Glass 6SJ7 average 125 mV Metal RCA 190 " GE 30 " GE 100 " GE 30 " Marconi 30 " Marconi 40 Metal 6SJ7 average 70 mV Both types metal average: 86 mV Both types glass average: 321 mV Tube tests All the glass 6SH7 NOS mil.spec tubes tested at 80% (+/- 1%) on my TC-2 emission (only) tester. The four metal 6SH7 tubes all tested in the 71% to 74% range. The two glass 6SJ7 tubes tested 88% and 91 %. The four metal 6SJ7 tubes all tested in the 88% to 94% range My conclusions Results only hold for this circuit and amplifier which, anyway, could use some further "humbugging". Results only hold for my random inventory of these types Metal tubes introduce a bit less hum than glass tubes in the same circuit. My mil.spec. NOS glass 6SH7's are decidedly NOT low hum but the glass (civilian?) 6SJ7's are a somewhat better. 6SH7's do have a bit more hum than 6SJ7's in the same circuit but we would need to test in circuits optimized to the same gain to be sure Could calculate the theoretical gain for each tube type in this circuit, then calculate the "hum per unit gain" for the two types (that's the homework assignment!) Select lowest hum, metal tubes for mic/phono preamps and use a 6SJ7 over a 6SH7 (as the book says!) BTW, I've left a low hum metal 6SJ7 in the mic/phono stage but used a glass 6SJ7 in the AF high level, not pre-amp, position of my A-8A... just because it looks nice! The 6SH7's will be left for RF use... Anyone want to add anything? Cheers, Roger |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Live Microphones High Gain Before Feedback | Pro Audio | |||
FA Millennia Media HV-3 Stereo Mic preamp, Excellent Condition! w/ high gain. | Pro Audio | |||
Linear gain stage | Vacuum Tubes | |||
6SH7 Phillips Kog | Vacuum Tubes | |||
mixer gain stage/structure question | Pro Audio |