Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#201
|
|||
|
|||
Clyde Slick wrote:
Debating trade trick no 28. Purposefully misinterpret and misrepresent waht I say, and then prove the misinterpreted misrepresentation is wrong. I thought that was his trick numero uno. He tries it all the time. |
#202
|
|||
|
|||
"EddieM" wrote in message
m **** You. Clearly posted in a moment of total clarity - Eddie style! ;-) |
#203
|
|||
|
|||
"Fella" wrote in message
Arny Krueger wrote: Pace, rhythm and timing is what musicans do, and what recording engineers sometimes modify. It's not a property of amplifiers or CD players. ..... Given that low cost players can provide facsimile reproduction of CDs, You don't even have a clue as to what you are missing out on You're just posturing. Wire is wire as Pinkerton would say it. So now you are putting words into pinkertons mouth? Where? If wire is wire and some el-cheapo radioshack wire would do the *same* thing then why in the hell did pinkerton go to all that trouble "home brew"ing all the exotic teflon silver bla bla? I think the story goes that he had a ton of the teflon silver stuff on hand, and wanted to use it up. What the f.ck is wrong with you people? Why does anything have to be wrong with us? Fact of the matter is that I do a fair amount of listening to a $80 Pioneer SX205 receiver. Yea, you listen to it? What does it say? Depends what I'm playing through it. |
#204
|
|||
|
|||
"Fella" wrote in message
Clyde Slick wrote: Debating trade trick no 28. Purposefully misinterpret and misrepresent waht I say, and then prove the misinterpreted misrepresentation is wrong. I thought that was his trick numero uno. He tries it all the time. After the butcher job you did on Pinkerton's post, Fella? How long ago did they remove your self-awareness? |
#205
|
|||
|
|||
"Fella" wrote in message .. . Arny Krueger wrote: Pace, rhythm and timing is what musicans do, and what recording engineers sometimes modify. It's not a property of amplifiers or CD players. ..... Given that low cost players can provide facsimile reproduction of CDs, You don't even have a clue as to what you are missing out on. Wire is wire as Pinkerton would say it. So now you are putting words into pinkertons mouth? If wire is wire and some el-cheapo radioshack wire would do the *same* thing then why in the hell did pinkerton go to all that trouble "home brew"ing all the exotic teflon silver bla bla? What the f.ck is wrong with you people? That "people" part is open to debate in his case... Fact of the matter is that I do a fair amount of listening to a $80 Pioneer SX205 receiver. Yea, you listen to it? What does it say? Based on his history, my money is on "**** you!" Cheers, Margaret |
#206
|
|||
|
|||
"Margaret von B." wrote
in message Yea, you listen to it? What does it say? Based on his history, my money is on "**** you!" Obviously, Maggie is feeling the pressure, too. |
#207
|
|||
|
|||
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message news "Margaret von B." wrote in message Yea, you listen to it? What does it say? Based on his history, my money is on "**** you!" Obviously, Maggie is feeling the pressure, too. Quit whining, Arny! Margaret |
#208
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 16:47:17 +0000 (UTC), Stewart Pinkerton
wrote: Nowadays, they mostly don't. Most modern R&D in amps and CD players is biased towards cost reduction. That's why my 'Chinky cheapy' Pioneer DV-575A will play any kind of silver disc while providing sound quality identical to that of a SOTA 'audiophile brand' CD player Care to provide the dbt details that supports your statement? |
#209
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 06:21:29 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote: "paul packer" wrote in message On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 05:03:47 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: Looks like Pinkerton tricked you into hanging yourself with your own tongue, Jeff. ;-) Is that anatomically possible, Arnie? Paul, since you brought up anatomically impossible acts, why don't you try performing that well-known one? Or have you already proved it? Do I have to draw you a picture, Paul? That's not nice, Arnie. And you were always such a kind and gentle soul. I hope years of debating George hasn't resulted in cross-pollination. :-) |
#210
|
|||
|
|||
paul packer said: Forgive me if I've misunderstood, but aren't the mass tests in mags like Hi-Fi Choice/What Hi-Fi all done blind--that is the participants don't see the components and aren't told anything about them. Nevertheless they detect differences and a few can even identify the same components over and over. Surely this proves that there's no expectation factor and that indeed components do sound significantly different. Or does it not? Exactly. Just as some of us have known all along that Dubya was lying about why he was invading Iraq, and some of you needed the "smoking gun" memo to figure it out. |
#211
|
|||
|
|||
paul packer said: I suggest switching from a carpenter's hammer to a ball peen A ball peen? Is that rude? That's a nonsequitur, Paulie -- an important "debating trade" tool. You may need another checkup. |
#212
|
|||
|
|||
Drunkie is snarling and loaded again. Actually, the reason that many of us unsubscribed from RAO is that it's 'regulars' are gullible idiots like Art Sackman, and pointless no-life cripples like Hiddius Gorge. So you admit I scared you off. I'm so proud. |
#213
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 06:22:09 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote: If you unsubscribed from RAO, Stewart, why are you cross-posting from there? Inability to notice the crosspost from rec.audio.tech noted. Well, here's a better question: if you unsubscribed from RAO why are you still taking part in the kind of futile and endlessly repeating debate that presumably caused you to unsubscribe from RAO in the first place? |
#214
|
|||
|
|||
paul packer said: If you unsubscribed from RAO, Stewart, why are you cross-posting from there? Inability to notice the crosspost from rec.audio.tech noted. Well, here's a better question: if you unsubscribed from RAO why are you still taking part in the kind of futile and endlessly repeating debate that presumably caused you to unsubscribe from RAO in the first place? Did you realize that Mr. **** stuck his ****ty nose into the exchange? BTW, Pukey is hoping to get knighted before the old Queen dies. That's the real reason he exed RAO -- we have no respect for royalty. |
#215
|
|||
|
|||
Arny Krueger wrote:
Why does anything have to be wrong with us? You confessed once over in rat that you actually also hear differences in real world listening environments, as opposed to in DBT's but that you disregard that. So how does that work? Is it because it is sighted? And then you have the audacity to claim that abx is about trusting your ears???!!! How much of an idiot can you get to be? Is there no limit to this? What the f.ck is rong with you?!?! You *HEAR* something but you don't *trust* what you hear, since you also *see* and know.. You say "I am seeing what is playing, what I am hearing can't be true. Here, let me put a bunch of cheap banana interconnects and level matching gear and cheap relay abx box in between this amp and the speakers. Let me level match this with some $80 pioneer receiver. Let me get all wound-up and stressed out about the whole issue.. Yeah OK, now I hear no difference, great." There *has* to be something wrong with you to do that. BTW: Did you google up that BAT (with the tube stage in) or have you ever heard one yourself? Did you hear what it does to voices, what it does to the midrange? Man, talk about bloated midrange. HUUGE motherf.cker. Or maybe it just reacted to my speakers and room in a peculiar way. Dunno. In any case, holger czukay, for instance, sounded like he was some king-kong, barely able to fit into the universe. Yeah, and some $80 pioneer sounds the same you say, sure. |
#216
|
|||
|
|||
Margaret von B. wrote:
"Fella" wrote in message .. . Arny Krueger wrote: Fact of the matter is that I do a fair amount of listening to a $80 Pioneer SX205 receiver. Yea, you listen to it? What does it say? Based on his history, my money is on "**** you!" That could very much be true in arny's case. In a way that, the pioneer might be ****ing him over pretty badly. It would explain all this bitter anger and hate. I remember when I just started working here I was in some kind of a cubicle space. Working very close to me was this guy who'd brought some old pioneer receiver (or was it yamaha?) and little mission monitor type of speakers. He'd (we'd) listen to radio all day. It was damn irritating, screechy disgusting sound. I'd go home all wound up and angry. |
#217
|
|||
|
|||
|
#218
|
|||
|
|||
Arny Krueger wrote:
"Fella" wrote in message Clyde Slick wrote: Debating trade trick no 28. Purposefully misinterpret and misrepresent waht I say, and then prove the misinterpreted misrepresentation is wrong. I thought that was his trick numero uno. He tries it all the time. After the butcher job you did on Pinkerton's post, Fella? Ok, so this must be trick no 2. You do this all the time arny. I accepted my mistake with not seeing the word "in" in pinkertons post. It was a mistake, this mr T pointed it out, and yes, I acknowledged it. The most important aspect here is that I did not do it *intentionally*. But you, arny, you have bad will, you are totaly bereft of any kind of a human dignity whatsoever. You intentionally twist and pervert, you are one of lowest, cheapest kind of a demagouge I've ever had the displeasure to meet. All that matters for you is to "win" (hahaaa) these "debates" in the eyes of the other dumskull borgs that follow you to your blind alley.. How long ago did they remove your self-awareness? If IRONY would... |
#219
|
|||
|
|||
"Fella" wrote in message
Arny Krueger wrote: Why does anything have to be wrong with us? You confessed once over in rat that you actually also hear differences in real world listening environments, as opposed to in DBT's but that you disregard that. I also hear differences in DBTs so what does that mean? So how does that work? Things sound different and I hear differences. Is it because it is sighted? It even happens sometimes when the listening test is blind. And then you have the audacity to claim that abx is about trusting your ears???!!! This comment does not follow from any logical progression of ideas. How much of an idiot can you get to be? I've had enough of your abuse, Fella. Try doing something anatomically impossible. |
#220
|
|||
|
|||
"paul packer" wrote in message
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 06:22:09 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: If you unsubscribed from RAO, Stewart, why are you cross-posting from there? Inability to notice the crosspost from rec.audio.tech noted. Well, here's a better question: if you unsubscribed from RAO why are you still taking part in the kind of futile and endlessly repeating debate that presumably caused you to unsubscribe from RAO in the first place? Where did I say that I unsubscribed from RAO? Packer, your hanging out with Middius seems to have caused you to read things that nobody wrote. He's got the same problem you know. |
#221
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 08:32:33 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote: "paul packer" wrote in message On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 06:22:09 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: If you unsubscribed from RAO, Stewart, why are you cross-posting from there? Inability to notice the crosspost from rec.audio.tech noted. Well, here's a better question: if you unsubscribed from RAO why are you still taking part in the kind of futile and endlessly repeating debate that presumably caused you to unsubscribe from RAO in the first place? Where did I say that I unsubscribed from RAO? Packer, your hanging out with Middius seems to have caused you to read things that nobody wrote. He's got the same problem you know. Inability to note that he Mr. Packer never claimed that *you* unsub'ed from RAO; that he was simply rephrasing the first question to Mr. Pinkerton. So, since you are reading things that nobody wrote, does this mean that YOU have been hanging out with Middius? |
#222
|
|||
|
|||
Arny Krueger wrote:
I also hear differences in DBTs so what does that mean? That one or the other is "malfunctioning" ? I've had enough of your abuse, Fella. I had asked pinkerton a question. It was you who dropped into the exchange butt-first. "heereee felllaaa, kick my butt fellaa" .. So I kekced yer buttt. Stop whining! BTW: Nice of you to avoid the BAT question. Typical. You google skccciieence-tist you. I only mentioned the BAT amp there because I had *just* been through a two week audition with it. It has a supersized midrange, it is incredibly fluent, lush. So much that one ends up listening to the amp, not the music. It is an amp to "die for" as my friend said once. I was *still* under the influence of that amp... Then you go and do a google on "bat integrated" I guess. And you throw about your google copy-paste knowledge against my first hand experience. You are a cheat arny, you are a liar. |
#223
|
|||
|
|||
dave weil said to Turdborg: So, since you are reading things that nobody wrote, does this mean that YOU have been hanging out with Middius? Hardly™. I always flush. |
#224
|
|||
|
|||
"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast
[dot] net wrote in message dave weil said to Turdborg: So, since you are reading things that nobody wrote, does this mean that YOU have been hanging out with Middius? HardlyT. I always flush. Nope, Sackman keeps floating up, again and again. |
#225
|
|||
|
|||
George M. Middius wrote: dave weil said to Turdborg: So, since you are reading things that nobody wrote, does this mean that YOU have been hanging out with Middius? Hardly=99. I always flush. Will you trolls from R.O.A please **** off back to the Land of The Brave and Zenophobic.Please. |
#226
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 07:37:46 -0500, dave weil
wrote: Inability to note that he Mr. Packer never claimed that *you* unsub'ed from RAO; that he was simply rephrasing the first question to Mr. Pinkerton. Thank you, Dave. It's nice to know that somebody at RAO is able to correctly interpret a simple post. |
#227
|
|||
|
|||
"paul packer" wrote in message
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 07:37:46 -0500, dave weil wrote: Inability to note that he Mr. Packer never claimed that *you* unsub'ed from RAO; that he was simply rephrasing the first question to Mr. Pinkerton. Thank you, Dave. It's nice to know that somebody at RAO is able to correctly interpret a simple post. One dirty hand washes another. Pinkerton's name appeared nowhere in Packer's reply to me. Check the following link to see the truth that Packer and Weil wish to obfuscate: http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...aed382fc511906 |
#228
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 07:09:51 -0500, dave weil
wrote: Do I have to draw you a picture, Paul? That's not nice, Arnie. And you were always such a kind and gentle soul. I hope years of debating George hasn't resulted in cross-pollination. :-) As I once noted to you a long time ago when you were defending Arnold, this day has come. Arnie has begun to swagger of late. His confidence has soared. The dark side of that is a certain arrogance which wasn't present at the time you're referring to. As for my defending him, I believe I merely gave him the benefit of the doubt, perhaps as a reaction against George's absurdly exaggerated hatred, which as you know I was never quite able to share. But then of course I was never really in on the in-fighting, so I may not be a good judge. I'm hoping that the kind and gentle comment was totally ironic, but I'm not sure. Ironic, but not totally. Compared to a certain poster we have here on aus.hi-fi, Arnie is a genuine angel. Perhaps you'd consider a swap? |
#229
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 07:33:47 -0400, George M. Middius cmndr
[underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote: paul packer said: Forgive me if I've misunderstood, but aren't the mass tests in mags like Hi-Fi Choice/What Hi-Fi all done blind--that is the participants don't see the components and aren't told anything about them. Nevertheless they detect differences and a few can even identify the same components over and over. Surely this proves that there's no expectation factor and that indeed components do sound significantly different. Or does it not? Exactly. Just as some of us have known all along that Dubya was lying about why he was invading Iraq, and some of you needed the "smoking gun" memo to figure it out. Only you could turn a blind listening test post into another diatribe against Bush, George. |
#230
|
|||
|
|||
"paul packer" wrote in message
Arnie has begun to swagger of late. Nahh Packer, you're just getting weaker. Look at this, you're remonstrating with one of the all-time whiner-losers of RAO, David "pity me" Weil. His confidence has soared. Realizing that the golden ear side of RAO has dumbed down to just Middius a few hangers-on and their sockpuppets can do that to a person. As for my defending him, I believe I merely gave him the benefit of the doubt, More like try to damn with faint praise. perhaps as a reaction against George's absurdly exaggerated hatred, which as you know I was never quite able to share. But, you're working on it, aren't you Packer? But then of course I was never really in on the in-fighting, so I may not be a good judge. Speaks to your lack of self-awareness, Packer. |
#231
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 06:20:58 -0500, dave weil
wrote: On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 16:47:17 +0000 (UTC), Stewart Pinkerton wrote: Nowadays, they mostly don't. Most modern R&D in amps and CD players is biased towards cost reduction. That's why my 'Chinky cheapy' Pioneer DV-575A will play any kind of silver disc while providing sound quality identical to that of a SOTA 'audiophile brand' CD player Care to provide the dbt details that supports your statement? Don't call him on it, Dave. As a 575 owner (called 676 here) I'm anxious to believe that he's right. |
#232
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 09:51:12 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote: "paul packer" wrote in message On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 07:37:46 -0500, dave weil wrote: Inability to note that he Mr. Packer never claimed that *you* unsub'ed from RAO; that he was simply rephrasing the first question to Mr. Pinkerton. Thank you, Dave. It's nice to know that somebody at RAO is able to correctly interpret a simple post. One dirty hand washes another. Pinkerton's name appeared nowhere in Packer's reply to me. His name isn't Stewart? That's news to me. Check the following link to see the truth that Packer and Weil wish to obfuscate: http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...aed382fc511906 First line in the post referenced by the above link: If you unsubscribed from RAO, Stewart, why are you cross-posting from there? Nope, no Pinkerton there. Apparently Arnold doesn't know Mr. Pinkerton's first name and is unable to follow a thread. Obfuscation from Mr. Krueger, anyone? |
#233
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 09:51:12 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote: Thank you, Dave. It's nice to know that somebody at RAO is able to correctly interpret a simple post. One dirty hand washes another. Pinkerton's name appeared nowhere in Packer's reply to me. Does it have to? I thought it was clear enough that I was simply using my reply to you to rephrase the question to Mr. Pinkerton. I'll remember to be more specific in future. |
#234
|
|||
|
|||
|
#235
|
|||
|
|||
Arnii, do you still deny having **** where your brains should be? Why does anything have to be wrong with us? It doesn't. As I've mentioned many times, it's entirely possible therapy would help you. And if not just therapy, then some medication. We just covered this yesterday, and you got all flustered and demanded guidance on using Thorazine. You seem to be at once embracing and rejecting the idea of getting professional help. If your wife's insurance doesn't cover it, you can get free treatment at a community clinic. |
#236
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 10:13:33 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote: "paul packer" wrote in message Arnie has begun to swagger of late. Nahh Packer, you're just getting weaker. Look at this, you're remonstrating with one of the all-time whiner-losers of RAO, David "pity me" Weil. His confidence has soared. Realizing that the golden ear side of RAO has dumbed down to just Middius a few hangers-on and their sockpuppets can do that to a person. As for my defending him, I believe I merely gave him the benefit of the doubt, More like try to damn with faint praise. perhaps as a reaction against George's absurdly exaggerated hatred, which as you know I was never quite able to share. But, you're working on it, aren't you Packer? But then of course I was never really in on the in-fighting, so I may not be a good judge. Speaks to your lack of self-awareness, Packer. This is the key indicator that you're on Mr. Krueger's **** list. You are reduced to a last name. It's a form of rudeness that Mr. Krueger is reduced to. |
#237
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 10:13:33 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote: "paul packer" wrote in message Arnie has begun to swagger of late. Nahh Packer, you're just getting weaker. Look at this, you're remonstrating with one of the all-time whiner-losers of RAO, David "pity me" Weil. I found Dave to be one of the few RAO regulars who could with any shred of evidence be described as a gentleman. That's no small achievement. His confidence has soared. Realizing that the golden ear side of RAO has dumbed down to just Middius a few hangers-on and their sockpuppets can do that to a person. I have to give you your due: you outstayed most of the opposition. As for my defending him, I believe I merely gave him the benefit of the doubt, More like try to damn with faint praise. Now who's whining? perhaps as a reaction against George's absurdly exaggerated hatred, which as you know I was never quite able to share. But, you're working on it, aren't you Packer? A touch of paranoia, Arnie? Please provide the evidence for that statement. But then of course I was never really in on the in-fighting, so I may not be a good judge. Speaks to your lack of self-awareness, Packer. Unnecessary nastiness again. Would you rather that I'd have been sufficiently in on the in-fighting to have hated you as much as George did (does). Think before you answer that. |
#238
|
|||
|
|||
|
#239
|
|||
|
|||
|
#240
|
|||
|
|||
|
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: from $0.99 SONY Theater RECEIVER ($600 less!) dOUBLEdECK AND headphones HiFi awesome | Marketplace | |||
Any Sony CD Guru out there? | Tech | |||
[?]Sourcing SONY DAT recorder 7-pin connector (and lead). | Pro Audio | |||
Sony Digital Amps (and SACD) vs. Sony Analog Amps | High End Audio |