Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Vinyl****ter: No Imagination
You ever notice they never, but never talk about what thay would like
to have, that doesn't exist, or how an existing product could be improved? And never, never will they say the old one was better than the new one. They have little imagination. |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Vinyl****ter: No Imagination
On May 23, 10:49*pm, Bret L wrote:
*You ever notice they never, but never talk about what thay would like to have, that doesn't exist, or how an existing product could be improved? I would like to have a sphere that you enter and that reproduces the sounds from every angle accurately. That way you can hear the guy who coughed in the right rear third tier spatially correct. Now why don't you just waddle over to your work trailer and rivet one together, my dull little Nazi. LoL. If, OTOH, you were referring to your burning desire to increase your collection of blow-up Marilyn Monroe love dolls you can count me out. LoL. And never, never will they say the old one was better than the new one. WTF are you prattling on about now? I love my Pilot 654 and my Scott 222C. They're far better than anything those companies are currently producing, as are my Dynaco A-25s. *They have little imagination. What a defective little thing you are. LoL. |
#3
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Vinyl****ter: No Imagination
WTF are you prattling on about now? I love my Pilot 654 and my Scott 222C. They're far better than anything those companies are currently producing, as are my Dynaco A-25s. *They have little imagination. What a defective little thing you are. LoL. You're profoundly stupid. The Scott 222 wasn't that great in its day, but it's probably better engineered than a lot of really expensive boutique **** that sells for many times its price (adjusted for inflation). You can not discuss any topic on its merits so you throw insults, thinking that it bothers me. Being called names by you doesn't bother me. You are proof to any reasonable third party that what i am saying has substantial merit since it can not be refuted on its merits. You and your boyfriend can just go play with each other for the rest of the night. You are intellectually tapped out. |
#4
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Vinyl****ter: No Imagination
On May 23, 11:55*pm, Bret L wrote:
WTF are you prattling on about now? I love my Pilot 654 and my Scott 222C. They're far better than anything those companies are currently producing, as are my Dynaco A-25s. *They have little imagination. What a defective little thing you are. LoL. *You're profoundly stupid. Really. What products that Scott, Pilot or Dynaco are currently producing do you feel are superior? And I'm "profoundly stupid". LMAO! *The Scott 222 wasn't that great in its day, but it's probably better engineered than a lot of really expensive boutique **** that sells for many times its price (adjusted for inflation). It makes for a very nice bedroom system and works quite well with the Dynaco A-25s. I just got the 654 so I haven't run it through its paces yet. It very well may replace the Scott. *You can not discuss any topic on its merits so you throw insults, thinking that it bothers me. Being called names by you doesn't bother me. You are proof to any reasonable third party that what i am saying has substantial merit since it can not be refuted on its merits. Um, no. What a reasonable third-party person would see is someone (hint: you) with ideas so stupid, backwards and illogical that they do not deserve serious consideration. Your 'science' is about as valid as reading bumps on skulls. The brainless blog you copy and paste and vomit here are written by psuedoscientists who are also the equivalent of bump-readers. They would also see some of your intellectual superiors (hint: just about everybody else) making fun of you and that someone (hint: you) is too stoopid to see it. They (hint: the reasonable third parties and everybody else) laugh at you both overtly (hint: me) or silently (hint: everybody else). What you're saying has no merit except to a lunatic and marginalized fringe (hint: you and Sailer, et al). *You and your boyfriend can just go play with each other for the rest of the night. You are intellectually tapped out. Indeed. LOL! |
#5
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Vinyl****ter: No Imagination
On May 24, 12:31*am, "Shhhh!!!! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote: WTF are you prattling on about now? I love my Pilot 654 and my Scott 222C. They're far better than anything those companies are currently producing, as are my Dynaco A-25s. I grew up listening through my father's 222C. Endless repititions of the Pet Sounds album, Four Tops "Reach Out" and the Byrds "Younger than Yesterday" Having such a sweet amp helped instill the joy of music. My current bedroom unit is a 299D |
#6
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Vinyl****ter: No Imagination
On May 24, 6:26*am, Clyde Slick wrote:
On May 24, 12:31*am, "Shhhh!!!! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: WTF are you prattling on about now? I love my Pilot 654 and my Scott 222C. They're far better than anything those companies are currently producing, as are my Dynaco A-25s. I grew up listening through my father's 222C. Endless repititions of the Pet Sounds album, Four Tops "Reach Out" and the Byrds "Younger than Yesterday" Having such a sweet amp helped instill the joy of music. My current bedroom unit is a 299D What are you running it through? And what are you running through it? I use an old Denon DCD-615 that I picked up for $20. The A-25s sound good too. I paid $10 for them. The 222c was $60. I also have an old Thorens TT that was $30. So for less than the cost of an "all-in-one" system I have a fun bedroom system. ((In lieu of US 7189s, which are going for $30-40 each on eBay, I run 6P14P-ER from old Soviet military stock in the 222c. I got them for $5/ each. They're rated for 10,000 hours just like the old Mullard 10M series. They have higher ratings than the 7189. And they sound great even though they were made by Slavs. Shhhh!)) |
#7
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Vinyl****ter: No Imagination
On May 24, 3:20*pm, "Shhhh!!!! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote: On May 24, 6:26*am, Clyde Slick wrote: On May 24, 12:31*am, "Shhhh!!!! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: WTF are you prattling on about now? I love my Pilot 654 and my Scott 222C. They're far better than anything those companies are currently producing, as are my Dynaco A-25s. I grew up listening through my father's 222C. Endless repititions of the Pet Sounds album, Four Tops "Reach Out" and the Byrds "Younger than Yesterday" Having such a sweet amp helped instill the joy of music. My current bedroom unit is a 299D What are you running it through? And what are you running through it? I use an old Denon DCD-615 that I picked up for $20. The A-25s sound good too. I paid $10 for them. The 222c was $60. I also have an old Thorens TT that was $30. So for less than the cost of an "all-in-one" system I have a fun bedroom system. ((In lieu of US 7189s, which are going for $30-40 each on eBay, I run 6P14P-ER from old Soviet military stock in the 222c. I got them for $5/ each. They're rated for 10,000 hours just like the old Mullard 10M player series. They have higher ratings than the 7189. And they sound great even though they were made by Slavs. Shhhh!)) Jolida tubed cd player and Boston Acoustics A-60's |
#8
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Vinyl****ter: No Imagination
On May 23, 10:49*pm, Bret L wrote:
*You ever notice they never, but never talk about what thay would like to have, that doesn't exist, or how an existing product could be improved? And never, never will they say the old one was better than the new one. That's absolutely not true in any way, shape or form. *They have little imagination. What have you accomplished that the rest of the world appreciates? Name one thing. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Vinylshitter, RAO's power couple | Audio Opinions | |||
Listening fatigue or my imagination? | High End Audio |