Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Bridging an amp... Circuit theory question???
Hi Gurus... idiot here trying to make sense of things.
I always thought that a stereo amplifier running in bridged mono mode inverts the mosfet output wave from one channel and couples that to the other channel. This is how the circuit creates more power into one channel. How far off base am I?? :~) Another thing. When a stereo amp is bridged mono pushing a 4 ohm load, Is it true or false that the amps circuit sees this a a 2 ohm load? If this is true, why? Confused... Garrett |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Bridging an amp... Circuit theory question???
Sanitarium wrote in
: Hi Gurus... idiot here trying to make sense of things. join the club! I always thought that a stereo amplifier running in bridged mono mode inverts the mosfet output wave from one channel and couples that to the other channel. This is how the circuit creates more power into one channel. Yup How far off base am I?? :~) Another thing. When a stereo amp is bridged mono pushing a 4 ohm load, Is it true or false that the amps circuit sees this a a 2 ohm load? If this is true, why? Confused... Garrett each channell sees 1/2 of the load. as in (2) 2ohm loads why? i don't know |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Bridging an amp... Circuit theory question???
Sanitarium wrote:
idiot here trying to make sense of things. I always thought that a stereo amplifier running in bridged mono mode inverts the mosfet output wave from one channel and couples that to the other channel. This is how the circuit creates more power into one channel. thats pretty much how it works, one channel pills while the other channel pushes actually takes the + voltage from one channel and the - voltage from the other channel and uses them together to have ahigher voltage. Another thing. When a stereo amp is bridged mono pushing a 4 ohm load, Is it true or false that the amps circuit sees this a a 2 ohm load? If this is true, why? a 4 ohm load is still a 4 ohm load. alot of folks say its 1/2 of the load but it IS NOT! alot of folks say each channel sees half the load IT DOES NOT! but alot of folks think so. Eddie Runner http://www.installer.com/tech/ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Bridging an amp... Circuit theory question???
In article ,
Sanitarium wrote: Hi Gurus... idiot here trying to make sense of things. I always thought that a stereo amplifier running in bridged mono mode inverts the mosfet output wave from one channel and couples that to the other channel. This is how the circuit creates more power into one channel. How far off base am I?? :~) Another thing. When a stereo amp is bridged mono pushing a 4 ohm load, Is it true or false that the amps circuit sees this a a 2 ohm load? If this is true, why? Confused... Garrett Some amps always run with two channels inverted. That way a big bass kick draws power from the positive power supply in one speaker and the negative power supply in the other. It reduces the number of capacitors that have to be packed into the amp. In such a case, the bridged mode simply makes it mono. Left + in --+---- non-inverting amp ---- Left + / Bridge + | | +--- Left - Bridge switch (mono) | | Ground --+--- Right + | Right + in --+---- inverting amp ---- Right - / Bridge - Yes, bridging cuts the perceived output impedance in half. Think of it this way. The two outputs are exactly opposite. Halfway inside the coil they cancel to zero volts. It's like each amp is seeing a coil half as long. Cancels to zero volts here in center v 2 Ohms v 2 Ohms ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | | | -- 4 Ohms -- | | | + phase - phase |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Bridging an amp... Circuit theory question???
No it doesnt Kevin.
If the voltage was ZERO half way in the speaker coil then there would be no current, and kurcheff tells us this is not possible! In a circuit the current is the same everywhere! Eddie Runner Kevin McMurtrie wrote: Yes, bridging cuts the perceived output impedance in half. Think of it this way. The two outputs are exactly opposite. Halfway inside the coil they cancel to zero volts. It's like each amp is seeing a coil half as long. Cancels to zero volts here in center v 2 Ohms v 2 Ohms ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | | | -- 4 Ohms -- | | | + phase - phase |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Bridging an amp... Circuit theory question???
ok eddie, then explain why bridged output @ 4 ohms is equalivlent to stereo
output @ 2 ohms. because each channel only sees half of the load from the speakers "Eddie Runner" wrote in message ... Sanitarium wrote: idiot here trying to make sense of things. I always thought that a stereo amplifier running in bridged mono mode inverts the mosfet output wave from one channel and couples that to the other channel. This is how the circuit creates more power into one channel. thats pretty much how it works, one channel pills while the other channel pushes actually takes the + voltage from one channel and the - voltage from the other channel and uses them together to have ahigher voltage. Another thing. When a stereo amp is bridged mono pushing a 4 ohm load, Is it true or false that the amps circuit sees this a a 2 ohm load? If this is true, why? a 4 ohm load is still a 4 ohm load. alot of folks say its 1/2 of the load but it IS NOT! alot of folks say each channel sees half the load IT DOES NOT! but alot of folks think so. Eddie Runner http://www.installer.com/tech/ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Bridging an amp... Circuit theory question???
Don't confuse current and voltage. If one end is -10V and the other is
+10V, then a conductive path between them will have 0V at one point. Voltage is relative, of course. In article , Eddie Runner wrote: No it doesnt Kevin. If the voltage was ZERO half way in the speaker coil then there would be no current, and kurcheff tells us this is not possible! In a circuit the current is the same everywhere! Eddie Runner Kevin McMurtrie wrote: Yes, bridging cuts the perceived output impedance in half. Think of it this way. The two outputs are exactly opposite. Halfway inside the coil they cancel to zero volts. It's like each amp is seeing a coil half as long. Cancels to zero volts here in center v 2 Ohms v 2 Ohms ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | | | -- 4 Ohms -- | | | + phase - phase |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Bridging an amp... Circuit theory question???
"Sanitarium" wrote in message
... | Hi Gurus... idiot here trying to make sense of things. | | I always thought that a stereo amplifier running in bridged mono mode | inverts the mosfet output wave from one channel and couples that to the | other channel. This is how the circuit creates more power into one | channel. Exactly. | | How far off base am I?? :~) | | Another thing. When a stereo amp is bridged mono pushing a 4 ohm load, | Is it true or false that the amps circuit sees this a a 2 ohm load? If | this is true, why? Each half of the bridged amp will see a 2-ohm load, but the load itself doesn't change. 4-ohms is 4-ohms, etc. The "bridged" amp sees the load as it is. 4 ohms. | | Confused... | Garrett Don't be confused - just check my previous response for a detailed link - scroll down the right hand side and select section 51 "Amplifier Bridging" for all the information (and more than you'd EVER want) you'd ever need. Gary |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Bridging an amp... Circuit theory question???
Kevin McMurtrie wrote:
Don't confuse current and voltage. If one end is -10V and the other is +10V, then a conductive path between them will have 0V at one point. Voltage is relative, of course. A voltage is a difference of potential between 2 points. If one point is +10v and the other is -10v, the difference is obviously 20 volts. 10 - (-10) = 20 And since you have doubled the voltage, you will double the current in the load as well, giving us (theorically) 4 time as much power than a single channel. The impedance of the load have not changed. -- Eric (Dero) Desrochers Hiroshima 45, Tchernobyl 86, Windows 95 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Bridging an amp... Circuit theory question???
ok eddie, then explain why bridged output @ 4 ohms is equalivlent to
stereo output @ 2 ohms. He already did. It's because the voltage is doubled. By the way, the scenario you described above is often equivalent (or close), but sometimes not. because each channel only sees half of the load from the speakers Half of the load? What happens to the other half? The speaker doesn't say to itself "gee, the amp must be bridged, so I better modify my impedance". (hey, if amps can "see", then speakers can talk!) |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Bridging an amp... Circuit theory question???
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Bridging an amp... Circuit theory question???
Kevin McMurtrie wrote:
The virtual impedance that each channel of the amps sees does change. No, it does not change! Half of the impedance is cancelled by the other out-of-phase amp. No it isnt! How can that happen?? When you bridge an amp you run the old 2 channels in SERIES! On a series circuit every thing passes through everything in the series! on the + side, the current rushed to the - side, on its journey it passes through the ENTIRE speaker voice coil! Then on the return trip from - to + the current again travels though the ENTIRE speaker voice coil.... nothing is cancelled.... That's why a 2 Ohm stable amp can only drive 4 Ohms bridged. No, its because there is more current caused by the increased voltage! Eddie Runner http://www.installer.com/tech/ |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Bridging an amp... Circuit theory question???
Gary Rodgers wrote:
Each half of the bridged amp will see a 2-ohm load, but the load itself doesn't change. 4-ohms is 4-ohms, etc. The "bridged" amp sees the load as it is. 4 ohms. Gary, you recomend a decent web site to answer all the questions here. but then you state exactly the opposite.... ha ha ha the web site says this: NOTE: Some people say that when an amplifier is bridged onto a 4 ohm load, it 'sees' a 2 ohm load. While it is true that the same current flows whether the amp is bridged on a 4 ohm load or a 2 ohm stereo load, the amplifier is driving a 4 ohm load across its outputs. A single 4 ohm speaker can never be a 2 ohm load. and you say, Each half of the bridged amp will see a 2-ohm load get with the program kiddo! Eddie Runner http://www.installer.com/tech/ Each channel does NOT see half!!! |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Bridging an amp... Circuit theory question???
"Eddie Runner" wrote in message ... | Gary Rodgers wrote: | | Each half of the bridged amp will see a 2-ohm load, but the load itself | doesn't change. 4-ohms is 4-ohms, etc. The "bridged" amp sees the load as | it is. 4 ohms. | | Gary, | you recomend a decent web site to answer all the questions here. | but then you state exactly the opposite.... ha ha ha Where? It says the bridged amp (complete circuit) sees the load just as it is - 4 ohms? A load is a load...now, when you look at the circuit and the way it is derived (bridged), each side of the bridge is acting as it would with a 2 ohm load... Gary |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Bridging an amp... Circuit theory question???
Gary Rodgers wrote: | Gary, | you recomend a decent web site to answer all the questions here. | but then you state exactly the opposite.... ha ha ha Where? Where? In your last messages! Thats where... you said each channel sees half the impedance, and it does not! And the website you recomended says if does not! It says the bridged amp (complete circuit) sees the load just as it is - 4 ohms? Sure, how can it see anything else?? A load is a load... thats right! So why make a reference to 1/2 of that load at all???? now, when you look at the circuit and the way it is derived (bridged), each side of the bridge is acting as it would with a 2 ohm load... No it isnt!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! read it again, thats NOT what that web page says! it says there is more current (like 1/2ing the load) why even mention halfing the load at all though is still a moronic thing to do cause it makes folks that dont read very well think its the same as 1/2ing the load and it is NOT in anyway like halfing the load.... I am 6ft tall and out in the wood room I have a 2x4 (piece of wood) thats 6 ft tall... telling folks that the 2x4 is just like ME is kind of missleading .... ;-) Yes, 1/2ing the impedance COULD make the current the same as when you bridge and amp... The current could also be the same if my pet dog ****es on the amp circuitry! Or if we dump semi wet concrete on the amp circuitry, or any number of reasons it could be the same.... BUT WHY MENTION THEM IF ITS NOT THE REAL REASON we get more current??? WHY MENTION 1/2 impedance it ITS NOT REALLY 1/2 IMPEDANCE???? DUMBDUMBDUMB!!! Eddie Runner http://www.installer.com/tech/ |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Bridging an amp... Circuit theory question???
"Eddie Runner" wrote in message
... | | | Gary Rodgers wrote: | | | Gary, | | you recomend a decent web site to answer all the questions here. | | but then you state exactly the opposite.... ha ha ha | | Where? | | Where? In your last messages! Thats where... you said each channel sees half | the impedance, and it does not! And the website you recomended says if does not! | | It says the bridged amp (complete circuit) sees the load just as it | is - 4 ohms? | | Sure, how can it see anything else?? | | A load is a load... | | thats right! | So why make a reference to 1/2 of that load at all???? | | now, when you look at the circuit and the | way it is derived (bridged), each side of the bridge is acting as it would | with a 2 ohm load... | | No it isnt!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | read it again, thats NOT what that web page says! | | it says there is more current (like 1/2ing the load) | why even mention halfing the load at all though is still a moronic thing to do | cause | it makes folks that dont read very well think its the same as 1/2ing the load | and | it is NOT in anyway like halfing the load.... | | I am 6ft tall and out in the wood room I have a 2x4 (piece of wood) thats 6 ft | tall... | telling folks that the 2x4 is just like ME is kind of missleading .... ;-) | | Yes, 1/2ing the impedance COULD make the current the same as when you | bridge and amp... | The current could also be the same if my pet dog ****es on the | amp circuitry! | Or if we dump semi wet concrete on the amp circuitry, or any | number of reasons it could be the same.... | | BUT WHY MENTION THEM IF ITS NOT THE REAL REASON we get more current??? | WHY MENTION 1/2 impedance it ITS NOT REALLY 1/2 IMPEDANCE???? | | DUMBDUMBDUMB!!! I stand corrected and I'm dumb dumb dumb. But at least I'm not caught up in semantics. Guess I better take that BSEE back to the place I got it. I'll go back to my car and listen to music. Gary |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Bridging an amp... Circuit theory question???
half of 4 is 2, half of 100 is 50....!
what does that have to do with bridging an amp? NOTHING!!!! Each channel (of the two before bridging) since they are in series sees THE WHOLE LOAD! NOT HALF OF IT! So Tony, what are you rambling about??? Eddie Runner Tony Hwang wrote: Hi, Rephrase it, bridged two amp circuits sharing the 4 Ohm load. Half of 4 is 2, right? Tony Gary Rodgers wrote: "Eddie Runner" wrote in message ... | Gary Rodgers wrote: | | Each half of the bridged amp will see a 2-ohm load, but the load itself | doesn't change. 4-ohms is 4-ohms, etc. The "bridged" amp sees the load as | it is. 4 ohms. | | Gary, | you recomend a decent web site to answer all the questions here. | but then you state exactly the opposite.... ha ha ha Where? It says the bridged amp (complete circuit) sees the load just as it is - 4 ohms? A load is a load...now, when you look at the circuit and the way it is derived (bridged), each side of the bridge is acting as it would with a 2 ohm load... Gary |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Bridging an amp... Circuit theory question???
Gary Rodgers wrote:
I stand corrected and I'm dumb dumb dumb. But at least I'm not caught up in semantics. Semantics are IMPORTANT! Guess I better take that BSEE back to the place I got it. another college boy bites the dust! WTF do the colleges teach the kiddos of today anyway??? Eddie |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Bridging an amp... Circuit theory question???
Guess I better take that BSEE back to the place I got it.
another college boy bites the dust! WTF do the colleges teach the kiddos of today anyway??? If they're teaching him that a 4 ohm load becomes 2 ohms, then I think the college professor should give his degrees back too... |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Bridging an amp... Circuit theory question???
good one Markie! ha ha
Mark Zarella wrote: I am 6ft tall and out in the wood room I have a 2x4 (piece of wood) thats 6 ft tall... telling folks that the 2x4 is just like ME is kind of missleading .... ;-) Yeah, because a 2x4 is not also 6 feet wide... |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Bridging an amp... Circuit theory question???
alright, after rereading a few things I realized my memory of the situation
was a little skewed.. too much reading not enough soak in time lately and I seem to be forgetting a few things. next question is, because I cannot find this anywhere... are speakers voltage driven devices or current driven devices ? I want to say current, because if I remember my definitions right, current is what does the work, not voltage, voltage was more of a potential to be able to do work.. am I remembering this correctly? "Eddie Runner" wrote in message ... I cant explain it because it IS NOT TRUE! What is true is that your normal (unbridged) 2 channels each see any speaker as the impedance that it is .. IE: a 4 ohm speaker is 4 ohms a 2 ohms speaker is 2 ohms.... And if you bridge the amp to one channel, then that channel sees any load you put on it just the same.. IE: a 4 ohm speaker is 4 ohms a 2 ohms speaker is 2 ohms.... But, because when you bridge an amp there is more voltage to the speaker, the current will rise! so the amp may run harder... There are two ways to increase current. 1) lower impedance 2) raise voltage In the case of bridging an amp we raise the voltage NOT lower the impedance... But so many folks are confused by it and I dont know why... Eddie Runner http://www.installer.com/tech/ Lex wrote: ok eddie, then explain why bridged output @ 4 ohms is equalivlent to stereo output @ 2 ohms. because each channel only sees half of the load from the speakers |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Bridging an amp... Circuit theory question???
alright, after rereading a few things I realized my memory of the
situation was a little skewed.. too much reading not enough soak in time lately and I seem to be forgetting a few things. next question is, because I cannot find this anywhere... are speakers voltage driven devices or current driven devices ? Not this again... Question for you...why does it matter? How is it relevant? I'd like to know, because this is the second time the question has been asked in the past few weeks. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Bridging an amp... Circuit theory question???
While what you say below is true, it does not directly address how the
speakers function. It is not voltage that sets up the force, but current. Therefore, they're current driven and the magnitude of the current can predict the electrical contribution to the cone motion. The same cannot be said of voltage. -- Mark Zarella zarellam at upstate dot edu "Kevin McMurtrie" wrote in message ... In article hyD%a.136534$Oz4.26769@rwcrnsc54, "Lex" wrote: alright, after rereading a few things I realized my memory of the situation was a little skewed.. too much reading not enough soak in time lately and I seem to be forgetting a few things. next question is, because I cannot find this anywhere... are speakers voltage driven devices or current driven devices ? I want to say current, because if I remember my definitions right, current is what does the work, not voltage, voltage was more of a potential to be able to do work.. am I remembering this correctly? They're voltage driven. The speaker's motion generates a back voltage so driving them by voltage provides some controlling negative feedback. Tuned enclosures depend on driving the cone by voltage too. Enclosures increase the sound levels by increasing the acoustic load on the speaker. That doesn't work the same way if the speaker is driven by a constant current (force). It might even work in the opposite way. Constant voltage: Watts= Volts^2 / Ohms Constant current: Watts= Amps^2 * Ohms With a constant voltage, an increased load (reduced Ohms) produces more power. With a constant current, it's the opposite. Of course both voltage and current are there. It's just that the amplifier regulates the signal voltage and lets the speaker draw any amount of current. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Bridging an amp... Circuit theory question???
In article ,
"Mark Zarella" seesigfile wrote: While what you say below is true, it does not directly address how the speakers function. It is not voltage that sets up the force, but current. Therefore, they're current driven and the magnitude of the current can predict the electrical contribution to the cone motion. The same cannot be said of voltage. -- Mark Zarella zarellam at upstate dot edu Of course it's the voltage that creates the current, and the current that creates the force. The current doesn't determine the cone motion, though; it determines the cone force. The voltage is a bit better at determining the motion because back EMF from motion causes some negative feedback. The force/current of the cone when driven by voltage is (Vin - Vback) / Ohms. There aren't any audio amps that regulate by current output. The audio quality would be extremely unpredictable. "Kevin McMurtrie" wrote in message ... In article hyD%a.136534$Oz4.26769@rwcrnsc54, "Lex" wrote: alright, after rereading a few things I realized my memory of the situation was a little skewed.. too much reading not enough soak in time lately and I seem to be forgetting a few things. next question is, because I cannot find this anywhere... are speakers voltage driven devices or current driven devices ? I want to say current, because if I remember my definitions right, current is what does the work, not voltage, voltage was more of a potential to be able to do work.. am I remembering this correctly? They're voltage driven. The speaker's motion generates a back voltage so driving them by voltage provides some controlling negative feedback. Tuned enclosures depend on driving the cone by voltage too. Enclosures increase the sound levels by increasing the acoustic load on the speaker. That doesn't work the same way if the speaker is driven by a constant current (force). It might even work in the opposite way. Constant voltage: Watts= Volts^2 / Ohms Constant current: Watts= Amps^2 * Ohms With a constant voltage, an increased load (reduced Ohms) produces more power. With a constant current, it's the opposite. Of course both voltage and current are there. It's just that the amplifier regulates the signal voltage and lets the speaker draw any amount of current. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Bridging an amp... Circuit theory question???
While what you say below is true, it does not directly address how the
speakers function. It is not voltage that sets up the force, but current. Therefore, they're current driven and the magnitude of the current can predict the electrical contribution to the cone motion. The same cannot be said of voltage. -- Mark Zarella zarellam at upstate dot edu Of course it's the voltage that creates the current, and the current that creates the force. Yes, but the voltage is not directly tied to the production of the force. The current is. The current doesn't determine the cone motion, though; it determines the cone force. I never said otherwise... The voltage is a bit better at determining the motion because back EMF from motion causes some negative feedback. The force/current of the cone when driven by voltage is (Vin - Vback) / Ohms. That's correct, but regardless, the device is driven by current. Ampere's law says so. If you want to ultimately predict cone motion as you suggest above, it's no easier to use the voltage-source method than it is to use the current-source method. In either case, you still need to know all the nuances of the impedance characteristics of the system. If given the voltage, you need impedance to determine force and DCR (as a function of temperature). If given the current, you need impedance to determine back emf. So in order to accurately make a prediction, the electrical and mechanical properties of the driver need to be known, as well as the "acoustical" properties of the system. Doesn't matter whether you identify the waveform as i(t) or v(t). |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Bridging an amp... Circuit theory question???
If
given the current, you need impedance to determine back emf. I realize this line is unclear. You don't need the impedance to determine back emf. You need the impedance to determine what the contribution to the current is because of the back emf. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Bridging an amp... Circuit theory question???
Eddie Runner wrote: half of 4 is 2, half of 100 is 50....! what does that have to do with bridging an amp? NOTHING!!!! Each channel (of the two before bridging) since they are in series sees THE WHOLE LOAD! NOT HALF OF IT! So Tony, what are you rambling about??? Hi, Both amps are looking into the load together, not individually. Well? Tony Eddie Runner Tony Hwang wrote: Hi, Rephrase it, bridged two amp circuits sharing the 4 Ohm load. Half of 4 is 2, right? Tony Gary Rodgers wrote: "Eddie Runner" wrote in message ... | Gary Rodgers wrote: | | Each half of the bridged amp will see a 2-ohm load, but the load itself | doesn't change. 4-ohms is 4-ohms, etc. The "bridged" amp sees the load as | it is. 4 ohms. | | Gary, | you recomend a decent web site to answer all the questions here. | but then you state exactly the opposite.... ha ha ha Where? It says the bridged amp (complete circuit) sees the load just as it is - 4 ohms? A load is a load...now, when you look at the circuit and the way it is derived (bridged), each side of the bridge is acting as it would with a 2 ohm load... Gary |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Bridging an amp... Circuit theory question???
BOTH!!
VOLTAGE AND CURRENT = WATTAGE wattage is power! one watt is the work done by one volt and one amp! Speakers MUST have BOTH voltage AND current to produce the WATTAGE it takes to do the work.... Eddie Runner Lex wrote: alright, after rereading a few things I realized my memory of the situation was a little skewed.. too much reading not enough soak in time lately and I seem to be forgetting a few things. next question is, because I cannot find this anywhere... are speakers voltage driven devices or current driven devices ? I want to say current, because if I remember my definitions right, current is what does the work, not voltage, voltage was more of a potential to be able to do work.. am I remembering this correctly? "Eddie Runner" wrote in message ... I cant explain it because it IS NOT TRUE! What is true is that your normal (unbridged) 2 channels each see any speaker as the impedance that it is .. IE: a 4 ohm speaker is 4 ohms a 2 ohms speaker is 2 ohms.... And if you bridge the amp to one channel, then that channel sees any load you put on it just the same.. IE: a 4 ohm speaker is 4 ohms a 2 ohms speaker is 2 ohms.... But, because when you bridge an amp there is more voltage to the speaker, the current will rise! so the amp may run harder... There are two ways to increase current. 1) lower impedance 2) raise voltage In the case of bridging an amp we raise the voltage NOT lower the impedance... But so many folks are confused by it and I dont know why... Eddie Runner http://www.installer.com/tech/ Lex wrote: ok eddie, then explain why bridged output @ 4 ohms is equalivlent to stereo output @ 2 ohms. because each channel only sees half of the load from the speakers |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Bridging an amp... Circuit theory question???
its so funny to read all these posts argueing about VOLTAGE OR CURRENT!
And whats funny is there are a few smart guys in this thread and none of them have said BOTH current and voltage or WATTAGE yet... Its like the chicken and the egg almost to argue that because current cant exist without voltage, so how can something even be current driven and not voltage driven??? This useless arguement makes me laugh. Eddie |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Bridging an amp... Circuit theory question???
In article ,
Eddie Runner wrote: its so funny to read all these posts argueing about VOLTAGE OR CURRENT! And whats funny is there are a few smart guys in this thread and none of them have said BOTH current and voltage or WATTAGE yet... Its like the chicken and the egg almost to argue that because current cant exist without voltage, so how can something even be current driven and not voltage driven??? This useless arguement makes me laugh. Eddie Don't worry, we're not attempting to redifine the universe. I did mention several times that the voltage and current are directly related. That's where the wattage, and the ability to do work, lies. If you had a perfect, zero ohm, superconducting speaker, the current would be the force, the voltage would be the speed, and the electrical wattage would exactly match power formulas for mechanical motion. Unfortunately most of the voltage, and therefore wattage, in a real speaker goes into heating the thin wire that makes the voice coil. |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Bridging an amp... Circuit theory question???
yes, I did see where you said it was useless... I didnt respond to
one of your messages, I just responded in general not quoting anyone. How can this CURRENT or VOLTAGE even be argued about?? (I guess Im asking the same questions as you Mark) May I suggest to anyone who cares my world famous ohms law chart. This copy of the chart is on installation bay walls all over the world. http://www.installer.com/tech/ohmslaw.html its fun to build these simple formulas into an EXCELL SPREADSHEET so you can see what happens when you change any of the variables... Eddie Mark Zarella wrote: Eddie, If you notice earlier in the thread I already said it was useless. I said: "why does it matter? How is it relevant? I'd like to know, because this is the second time the question has been asked in the past few weeks." -- Mark Zarella zarellam at upstate dot edu "Eddie Runner" wrote in message ... its so funny to read all these posts argueing about VOLTAGE OR CURRENT! And whats funny is there are a few smart guys in this thread and none of them have said BOTH current and voltage or WATTAGE yet... Its like the chicken and the egg almost to argue that because current cant exist without voltage, so how can something even be current driven and not voltage driven??? This useless arguement makes me laugh. Eddie |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Bridging an amp... Circuit theory question???
Kevin McMurtrie wrote:
Don't worry, we're not attempting to redifine the universe. ha ha I did mention several times that the voltage and current are directly related. That's where the wattage, and the ability to do work, lies. sure, its all related! Thats the secret of OHMS LAW that so many folks seem to miss! And even those that do finally get it that they are all related, they seem to still missunderstand exactly what the relationships are... If you had a perfect, zero ohm, superconducting speaker, the current would be the force, you mean a DIRECT SHORT! ha ha Alot of current for a short time till the amp or wires fry themselves... the voltage would be the speed, Nope, Kevin!! Slow down a little! VOLTAGE IS NOT SPEED! Electrons flow the same speed no matter if its 9 volts or 12 volts. Eddie |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Bridging an amp... Circuit theory question???
In article ,
Eddie Runner wrote: Kevin McMurtrie wrote: Don't worry, we're not attempting to redifine the universe. ha ha I did mention several times that the voltage and current are directly related. That's where the wattage, and the ability to do work, lies. sure, its all related! Thats the secret of OHMS LAW that so many folks seem to miss! And even those that do finally get it that they are all related, they seem to still missunderstand exactly what the relationships are... If you had a perfect, zero ohm, superconducting speaker, the current would be the force, you mean a DIRECT SHORT! ha ha Alot of current for a short time till the amp or wires fry themselves... the voltage would be the speed, Nope, Kevin!! Slow down a little! VOLTAGE IS NOT SPEED! Electrons flow the same speed no matter if its 9 volts or 12 volts. Eddie A superconducting speaker would be a dead short only if you stopped the cone. Voltage does determine the speed, just as it does for a DC motor. The current is (Vin - Vback)/Ohms. The higher the input voltage, the faster the cone must move to create back EMF to balance the equation. The amount of back EMF created by motion depends on the winding size. Of course we're getting theoretical here. 4 or 8 ohms is a lot of resistance so speakers are far from perfect. Don't bring electrons into this. They move only a little faster than grass grows. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Bridging an amp... Circuit theory question???
Kevin McMurtrie wrote:
If you had a perfect, zero ohm, superconducting speaker, the current would be the force, A superconducting speaker would be a dead short only if you stopped the cone. YOU SAID zero ohms! THATS A DEAD SHORT! Voltage does determine the speed, just as it does for a DC motor. Voltage deteminines the speed for an electric motor because there is MORE force to or from the permanent magnets... NOT because higher voltage travels through a circuit faster! High voltage or low voltage both have the current still have the same speed through a circuit... For instance, a far away radio signal thats STRONG doesnt arrive ant faster than a far away rado signal thats WEAK....If that was the case you would have something like the doppler effect when a radio station fades.. And you dont... There can be doppler effects in radio but not because a signal is weaker or stronger... The current is (Vin - Vback)/Ohms. The higher the input voltage, the faster the cone must move to create back EMF to balance the equation. The amount of back EMF created by motion depends on the winding size. But were not talking about back EMF.... And back EMF doesnt affect the SPEED of voltage anyway, only the amount of the voltage. If you apply voltagoe to a circuit (like a speaker) and the motion of the voice coil through the magnet created ITS OWN VOLTAGE, then thats called back EMF... The added voltage adds to the original voltage and changes the potential. To see the back EMF with out the original voltage simply hook your volt meter to your woofer speaker trminals (with the woof disconnected) and then push doen the woofer cone, your meter will tell you that voltage is being produced by the voice coil moving.. But of course, nothing to do with speed... NOW, you may be confused, thinking about your electric motor, because when a back emf is dcreated by the motors movement, that could change and even reduce the original voltage, so that reduced voltage might make your electric motor run slower, but it still has nothing to do with the speed of the juice through the wire... Of course we're getting theoretical here. 4 or 8 ohms is a lot of resistance so speakers are far from perfect. Alot?? I guess that depends on how you look at it... Don't bring electrons into this. They move only a little faster than grass grows. nearly the speed of light! IMO, thats quite a bit faster than grass grows... Eddie Runner |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Bridging an amp... Circuit theory question???
"Eddie Runner" wrote in message ... | BOTH!! | VOLTAGE AND CURRENT = WATTAGE | wattage is power! | one watt is the work done by one volt and one amp! | | Speakers MUST have BOTH voltage AND current to produce | the WATTAGE it takes to do the work.... | | Eddie Runner | DUMB DUMB DUMB Speakers don't produce any wattage. Ever. Better get a refund on your education as well. BTW - Power (wattage) is defined in many ways - and it isn't just "Current & Voltage" - ya got 3 variables... Amongst MANY variations of Ohm's law a P=VI P=I^2 * R P=V^2 / R = (Vmax - Vmin)/R==== BTW - this is the form of ohm's law that applies to the bridging of amps, and the resultant non-linear function for the performance of such - the confusion comes because the current needed to drive the same stereo load increases non-linearly. While you are correct that the circuit does not "see" a 2-ohm load with a 4-ohm stereo load (since, as I have also stated, a 4 ohm load is a 4 ohm load), the net result in the current required is such that the circuit ACTS as if you had a single amp of twice the power with a 2-ohm load. Also, btw, try looking at a little op-amp theory and you'll find out there *are* uses for current sources, I'll leave the refresher up to you....and try looking up Thevenin and Norton equivalents as well... snort Gary |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Bridging an amp... Circuit theory question???
Gary Rodgers wrote:
DUMB DUMB DUMB Speakers don't produce any wattage.Ever. Ever?? have you ever heard of an ACCOUSTIC WATT??? I believe that can be produced by a speaker! ;-) Better get a refund on your education as well. My Education??? Who said I had one I had to pay for?? Wasnt it YOU that said you should rip on a person you dont even know... ha ha ha Im not one of the college boyees! Hell I forgot which year of high school it was I dropped out of..! ha ha All the STUPID college fellows just made me want to take a short cut to the real world and miss what I thought at the time was a waste... BTW - Power (wattage) is defined in many ways - and it isn't just "Current & Voltage" - I never said it was DID I?? ya got 3 variables... Amongst MANY variations of Ohm's law a P=VI P=I^2 * R P=V^2 / R = (Vmax - Vmin)/R==== BTW - this is the form of ohm's law that applies to the bridging of amps, and the resultant non-linear function for the performance of such - the confusion comes because the current needed to drive the same stereo load increases non-linearly. No the confusion comes because so many IDIOTS say that bridging 1/2s the impedance AND IT DOESNT! You can call around to stereo shops and MOST of the PROS will tell you IT DOES 1/2 the impedance! BUT IT DOESNT! Its just an out of control piece of missinformation! While you are correct that the circuit does not "see" a 2-ohm load with a 4-ohm stereo load (since, as I have also stated, a 4 ohm load is a 4 ohm load), the net result in the current required is such that the circuit ACTS as if you had a single amp of twice the power with a 2-ohm load. No, it ACTS like you increased the voltage! IF IT WERE to act like 1/2 the impedance, WHY EVEN SAY SO?? If it was the same impedance as if I let my dog **** on the load, thats no reason to run around telling folks ITS EXACTLY THE SAME AS IF MY DOG ****ED ON IT.... See?? Why mention something that you dont need to...SPECIALLY when so many folks are walking around saying it wrong because folks like you are saying it is just like 1/2 ... Also, btw, try looking at a little op-amp theory and you'll find out there *are* uses for current sources, Op amp current sources are NOT REALLY CURRENT SOURCES! I have played a bit with op amps and well... I'll leave the refresher up to you....and try looking up Thevenin and Norton equivalents as well... Why? I dont think they relate to anything we ar etalking about here ... Eddie |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Bridging an amp... Circuit theory question???
In article ,
Eddie Runner wrote: Kevin McMurtrie wrote: If you had a perfect, zero ohm, superconducting speaker, the current would be the force, A superconducting speaker would be a dead short only if you stopped the cone. YOU SAID zero ohms! THATS A DEAD SHORT! Voltage does determine the speed, just as it does for a DC motor. Voltage deteminines the speed for an electric motor because there is MORE force to or from the permanent magnets... NOT because higher voltage travels through a circuit faster! High voltage or low voltage both have the current still have the same speed through a circuit... For instance, a far away radio signal thats STRONG doesnt arrive ant faster than a far away rado signal thats WEAK....If that was the case you would have something like the doppler effect when a radio station fades.. And you dont... There can be doppler effects in radio but not because a signal is weaker or stronger... The current is (Vin - Vback)/Ohms. The higher the input voltage, the faster the cone must move to create back EMF to balance the equation. The amount of back EMF created by motion depends on the winding size. But were not talking about back EMF.... And back EMF doesnt affect the SPEED of voltage anyway, only the amount of the voltage. If you apply voltagoe to a circuit (like a speaker) and the motion of the voice coil through the magnet created ITS OWN VOLTAGE, then thats called back EMF... The added voltage adds to the original voltage and changes the potential. To see the back EMF with out the original voltage simply hook your volt meter to your woofer speaker trminals (with the woof disconnected) and then push doen the woofer cone, your meter will tell you that voltage is being produced by the voice coil moving.. But of course, nothing to do with speed... NOW, you may be confused, thinking about your electric motor, because when a back emf is dcreated by the motors movement, that could change and even reduce the original voltage, so that reduced voltage might make your electric motor run slower, but it still has nothing to do with the speed of the juice through the wire... Of course we're getting theoretical here. 4 or 8 ohms is a lot of resistance so speakers are far from perfect. Alot?? I guess that depends on how you look at it... Don't bring electrons into this. They move only a little faster than grass grows. nearly the speed of light! IMO, thats quite a bit faster than grass grows... Eddie Runner This thread is dead. Buy yourself an electronics book. My personal favorite, and a favorite of many, is "The Art of Electronics" by Horowitz and Hill. Winfield Hill even hangs out in sci.electronics.design. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Bridging an amp... Circuit theory question???
If you had a perfect, zero ohm, superconducting speaker, the current
would be the force, A superconducting speaker would be a dead short only if you stopped the cone. YOU SAID zero ohms! THATS A DEAD SHORT! By "zero ohms" he was implying that the DCR is zero ohms (impossible, superconducting or not). He said nothing of the reactive components. In fact, even "theoretically" you can't reduce the reactive component to nothing. You wouldn't be able to make the cone move! His initial point still stands. The current is (Vin - Vback)/Ohms. The higher the input voltage, the faster the cone must move to create back EMF to balance the equation. The amount of back EMF created by motion depends on the winding size. But were not talking about back EMF.... And back EMF doesnt affect the SPEED of voltage anyway, only the amount of the voltage. No, it doesn't affect the amount of voltage coming from the amplifier. It affects the current flow from the amplifier. Back EMF is an essential part of the equation, like it or not. So it's perfectly valid to bring up in this instance. If you apply voltagoe to a circuit (like a speaker) and the motion of the voice coil through the magnet created ITS OWN VOLTAGE, then thats called back EMF... Well, actually it's not. Back EMF is something completely different. What we've all been referring to as "back emf" is generally called "motional EMF" (eg. J. King, J.AES, 1969?). Back emf involves the storage and release of energy by an inductor. The added voltage adds to the original voltage and changes the potential. To see the back EMF with out the original voltage simply hook your volt meter to your woofer speaker trminals (with the woof disconnected) and then push doen the woofer cone, your meter will tell you that voltage is being produced by the voice coil moving.. But of course, nothing to do with speed... The speed of coil motion through the field is one of the parameters that determines the voltage amplitude. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Bridging an amp... Circuit theory question???
DUMB DUMB DUMB
Speakers don't produce any wattage. Ever. Better get a refund on your education as well. BTW - Power (wattage) is defined in many ways - and it isn't just "Current & Voltage" - ya got 3 variables... Amongst MANY variations of Ohm's law a P=VI P=I^2 * R Dumb dumb dumb. That's actually not ohm's law, but joule's law of heating. P=V^2 / R = (Vmax - Vmin)/R Forgot a squared. ==== BTW - this is the form of ohm's law that applies to the bridging of amps, and the resultant non-linear function for the performance of such How is it nonlinear? - the confusion comes because the current needed to drive the same stereo load increases non-linearly. Um...huh? While you are correct that the circuit does not "see" a 2-ohm load with a 4-ohm stereo load (since, as I have also stated, a 4 ohm load is a 4 ohm load), the net result in the current required is such that the circuit ACTS as if you had a single amp of twice the power with a 2-ohm load. Depends what you mean. The "current required" for what? |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Bridging an amp... Circuit theory question???
Mark Zarella wrote:
YOU SAID zero ohms! THATS A DEAD SHORT! By "zero ohms" he was implying that the DCR is zero ohms (impossible, superconducting or not). He said nothing of the reactive components. In fact, even "theoretically" you can't reduce the reactive component to nothing. You wouldn't be able to make the cone move! His initial point still stands. Oh, I see what he was getting at... But still ZERO OHMS is a short. What he is saying still doesnt prove the impedance 1/2s when bridging though... ;-) But were not talking about back EMF.... And back EMF doesnt affect the SPEED of voltage anyway, only the amount of the voltage. No, it doesn't affect the amount of voltage coming from the amplifier. It affects the current flow from the amplifier. The inducted voltage (EMF) does affect the total potential of the circuit. Back EMF is an essential part of the equation, like it or not. So it's perfectly valid to bring up in this instance. But it is still not proof that the impedance 1/2s And this guy was trying to say that higher voltage travels faster than lower voltage.... If you apply voltagoe to a circuit (like a speaker) and the motion of the voice coil through the magnet created ITS OWN VOLTAGE, then thats called back EMF... Well, actually it's not. Back EMF is something completely different. What we've all been referring to as "back emf" is generally called "motional EMF" (eg. J. King, J.AES, 1969?). Back emf involves the storage and release of energy by an inductor. Thats exactly what I was saying Mark, I was refering to a Speaker motor. But of course, nothing to do with speed... The speed of coil motion through the field is one of the parameters that determines the voltage amplitude. He said SPEED is related to voltage. your talking about something cvompletely different Mark now your talking about frequency Eddie |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
bridging and output question | Car Audio | |||
Repost: Reason 2.0 on a Celeron 2GHz laptop. | General |