A few months ago - in July - I purchased Cool Edit 2000 from Syntrillium
Software.
BIG MISTAKE!

I used it one time, along with Feurio CD Manager, to do post-production work
on a studio recorded master. It took a bit of time but I was successful. Now
I am attempting to use it again, but it appears defective, unable to import
files from Feurio.

Seeking support on the linked website, I'm told that Adobe Systems purchased
the "technology assets" of Syntrillium last May (before I bought the
software), has discontinued Cool Edit 2000, and does not support it. They do
however sell an upgrade for $99, or their new Adobe Audition for $299!

This is a ripoff. I paid for this software just a few months ago. I should
be entitled to either tech support or at least a partial refund for its
becoming defective so soon.

Any suggestions?

"Howard Davis" wrote in message

A few months ago - in July - I purchased Cool Edit 2000 from
Syntrillium Software.
BIG MISTAKE!

I used it one time, along with Feurio CD Manager, to do
post-production work on a studio recorded master. It took a bit of
time but I was successful. Now I am attempting to use it again, but
it appears defective, unable to import files from Feurio.

Seeking support on the linked website, I'm told that Adobe Systems
purchased the "technology assets" of Syntrillium last May (before I
bought the software), has discontinued Cool Edit 2000, and does not
support it. They do however sell an upgrade for $99, or their new
Adobe Audition for $299!

This is a ripoff. I paid for this software just a few months ago. I
should be entitled to either tech support or at least a partial
refund for its becoming defective so soon.

Any suggestions?

Pay the $99 for the upgrade. That gives you full-tilt Adobe Audition for
less than $200 out-of-pocket, a deal and a half.

"Howard Davis" wrote in message

A few months ago - in July - I purchased Cool Edit 2000 from
Syntrillium Software.
BIG MISTAKE!

I used it one time, along with Feurio CD Manager, to do
post-production work on a studio recorded master. It took a bit of
time but I was successful. Now I am attempting to use it again, but
it appears defective, unable to import files from Feurio.

Seeking support on the linked website, I'm told that Adobe Systems
purchased the "technology assets" of Syntrillium last May (before I
bought the software), has discontinued Cool Edit 2000, and does not
support it. They do however sell an upgrade for $99, or their new
Adobe Audition for $299!

This is a ripoff. I paid for this software just a few months ago. I
should be entitled to either tech support or at least a partial
refund for its becoming defective so soon.

Any suggestions?

Pay the $99 for the upgrade. That gives you full-tilt Adobe Audition for
less than $200 out-of-pocket, a deal and a half.

Howard Davis wrote:

A few months ago - in July - I purchased Cool Edit 2000 from Syntrillium
Software.
BIG MISTAKE!

I used it one time, along with Feurio CD Manager, to do post-production work
on a studio recorded master. It took a bit of time but I was successful. Now
I am attempting to use it again, but it appears defective, unable to import
files from Feurio.

Seeking support on the linked website, I'm told that Adobe Systems purchased
the "technology assets" of Syntrillium last May (before I bought the
software), has discontinued Cool Edit 2000, and does not support it. They do
however sell an upgrade for $99, or their new Adobe Audition for $299!

This is a ripoff. I paid for this software just a few months ago. I should
be entitled to either tech support or at least a partial refund for its
becoming defective so soon.

Any suggestions?

Have you tried getting your money back from the place you bought it?

I agree - this is crap. Adobe should support the existing Syntrillium
customers. I will remember this.
--
% Randy Yates % "...the answer lies within your soul
%% Fuquay-Varina, NC % 'cause no one knows which side
%%% 919-577-9882 % the coin will fall."
%%%% % 'Big Wheels', *Out of the Blue*, ELO
http://home.earthlink.net/~yatescr

Howard Davis wrote:

A few months ago - in July - I purchased Cool Edit 2000 from Syntrillium
Software.
BIG MISTAKE!

I used it one time, along with Feurio CD Manager, to do post-production work
on a studio recorded master. It took a bit of time but I was successful. Now
I am attempting to use it again, but it appears defective, unable to import
files from Feurio.

Seeking support on the linked website, I'm told that Adobe Systems purchased
the "technology assets" of Syntrillium last May (before I bought the
software), has discontinued Cool Edit 2000, and does not support it. They do
however sell an upgrade for $99, or their new Adobe Audition for $299!

This is a ripoff. I paid for this software just a few months ago. I should
be entitled to either tech support or at least a partial refund for its
becoming defective so soon.

Any suggestions?

Have you tried getting your money back from the place you bought it?

I agree - this is crap. Adobe should support the existing Syntrillium
customers. I will remember this.
--
% Randy Yates % "...the answer lies within your soul
%% Fuquay-Varina, NC % 'cause no one knows which side
%%% 919-577-9882 % the coin will fall."
%%%% % 'Big Wheels', *Out of the Blue*, ELO
http://home.earthlink.net/~yatescr

"Randy Yates" wrote in message
link.net...
Howard Davis wrote:

A few months ago - in July - I purchased Cool Edit 2000 from
Syntrillium
Software.
BIG MISTAKE!

I used it one time, along with Feurio CD Manager, to do post-production
work
on a studio recorded master. It took a bit of time but I was successful.
Now
I am attempting to use it again, but it appears defective, unable to
import
files from Feurio.

Seeking support on the linked website, I'm told that Adobe Systems
purchased
the "technology assets" of Syntrillium last May (before I bought the
software), has discontinued Cool Edit 2000, and does not support it.
They do
however sell an upgrade for $99, or their new Adobe Audition for $299!

This is a ripoff. I paid for this software just a few months ago. I
should
be entitled to either tech support or at least a partial refund for its
becoming defective so soon.

Any suggestions?

Have you tried getting your money back from the place you bought it?

I agree - this is crap. Adobe should support the existing Syntrillium
customers. I will remember this.

**Yeah, like that'll bother them. I dropped 600 Bucks on a (reasonably) high
end video card, a few years ago. The company never released decent drivers
for the damned card. I swore that I would never buy a Diamond product ever
again. Like that worried them. I gave up and bought an 80 Dollar card which
performed better, around 18 months later.


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

"Randy Yates" wrote in message
link.net...
Howard Davis wrote:

A few months ago - in July - I purchased Cool Edit 2000 from
Syntrillium
Software.
BIG MISTAKE!

I used it one time, along with Feurio CD Manager, to do post-production
work
on a studio recorded master. It took a bit of time but I was successful.
Now
I am attempting to use it again, but it appears defective, unable to
import
files from Feurio.

Seeking support on the linked website, I'm told that Adobe Systems
purchased
the "technology assets" of Syntrillium last May (before I bought the
software), has discontinued Cool Edit 2000, and does not support it.
They do
however sell an upgrade for $99, or their new Adobe Audition for $299!

This is a ripoff. I paid for this software just a few months ago. I
should
be entitled to either tech support or at least a partial refund for its
becoming defective so soon.

Any suggestions?

Have you tried getting your money back from the place you bought it?

I agree - this is crap. Adobe should support the existing Syntrillium
customers. I will remember this.

**Yeah, like that'll bother them. I dropped 600 Bucks on a (reasonably) high
end video card, a few years ago. The company never released decent drivers
for the damned card. I swore that I would never buy a Diamond product ever
again. Like that worried them. I gave up and bought an 80 Dollar card which
performed better, around 18 months later.


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

Trevor Wilson wrote:
[...]
**Yeah, like that'll bother them.

I really don't care if it bothers them or not. That is not my concern. My
concern is that I buy products, and influence my company to buy products,
from sources that honor their agreements. Otherwise you may very well
be throwing money away, as Howard did.
--
% Randy Yates % "...the answer lies within your soul
%% Fuquay-Varina, NC % 'cause no one knows which side
%%% 919-577-9882 % the coin will fall."
%%%% % 'Big Wheels', *Out of the Blue*, ELO
http://home.earthlink.net/~yatescr

Trevor Wilson wrote:
[...]
**Yeah, like that'll bother them.

I really don't care if it bothers them or not. That is not my concern. My
concern is that I buy products, and influence my company to buy products,
from sources that honor their agreements. Otherwise you may very well
be throwing money away, as Howard did.
--
% Randy Yates % "...the answer lies within your soul
%% Fuquay-Varina, NC % 'cause no one knows which side
%%% 919-577-9882 % the coin will fall."
%%%% % 'Big Wheels', *Out of the Blue*, ELO
http://home.earthlink.net/~yatescr

"Howard Davis" cross-posted to several groups:

A few months ago - in July - I purchased Cool Edit 2000 from Syntrillium
Software.
BIG MISTAKE!

I used it one time, along with Feurio CD Manager, to do post-production work
on a studio recorded master. It took a bit of time but I was successful. Now
I am attempting to use it again, but it appears defective, unable to import
files from Feurio.

Seeking support on the linked website, I'm told that Adobe Systems purchased
the "technology assets" of Syntrillium last May (before I bought the
software), has discontinued Cool Edit 2000, and does not support it. They do
however sell an upgrade for $99, or their new Adobe Audition for $299!

This is a ripoff. I paid for this software just a few months ago. I should
be entitled to either tech support or at least a partial refund for its
becoming defective so soon.

Any suggestions?

I have no suggestions for getting a better response from Adobe and can't
help you with your problem of "importing Feurio files" because I don't know
what a "Feurio file" is. Furthermore, since it worked for you before, you
can't blame the software without first reviewing what has changed in your
environment.

I do know that Adobe doesn't offer a Cool2000 upgrade at all, so I don't
know what you're talking about there either.

The $99 upgrade to Audition is a bargain. Although it's billed as a new
name for CE pro, it actually has many improvements over the final version
of CE pro and, in my environment, I find these improvements very valuable
and welcome. As the word spreads, I expect it will leave the competition in
the dust.

"Howard Davis" cross-posted to several groups:

A few months ago - in July - I purchased Cool Edit 2000 from Syntrillium
Software.
BIG MISTAKE!

I used it one time, along with Feurio CD Manager, to do post-production work
on a studio recorded master. It took a bit of time but I was successful. Now
I am attempting to use it again, but it appears defective, unable to import
files from Feurio.

Seeking support on the linked website, I'm told that Adobe Systems purchased
the "technology assets" of Syntrillium last May (before I bought the
software), has discontinued Cool Edit 2000, and does not support it. They do
however sell an upgrade for $99, or their new Adobe Audition for $299!

This is a ripoff. I paid for this software just a few months ago. I should
be entitled to either tech support or at least a partial refund for its
becoming defective so soon.

Any suggestions?

I have no suggestions for getting a better response from Adobe and can't
help you with your problem of "importing Feurio files" because I don't know
what a "Feurio file" is. Furthermore, since it worked for you before, you
can't blame the software without first reviewing what has changed in your
environment.

I do know that Adobe doesn't offer a Cool2000 upgrade at all, so I don't
know what you're talking about there either.

The $99 upgrade to Audition is a bargain. Although it's billed as a new
name for CE pro, it actually has many improvements over the final version
of CE pro and, in my environment, I find these improvements very valuable
and welcome. As the word spreads, I expect it will leave the competition in
the dust.

On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 23:48:24 GMT, "Howard Davis"
wrote:

A few months ago - in July - I purchased Cool Edit 2000 from Syntrillium
Software.
BIG MISTAKE!

I used it one time, along with Feurio CD Manager, to do post-production work
on a studio recorded master. It took a bit of time but I was successful. Now
I am attempting to use it again, but it appears defective, unable to import
files from Feurio.

Seeking support on the linked website, I'm told that Adobe Systems purchased
the "technology assets" of Syntrillium last May (before I bought the
software), has discontinued Cool Edit 2000, and does not support it. They do
however sell an upgrade for $99, or their new Adobe Audition for $299!

This is a ripoff. I paid for this software just a few months ago. I should
be entitled to either tech support or at least a partial refund for its
becoming defective so soon.

OK, there are many issues raised here, and my opinions won't seem to
be congruent with others who have posted here, but bear with me....

1. CE2000 is probably the finest 2-channel audio editor that was ever
available at a reasonable price. The fact that you managed to acquire
a copy briefly before Adobe snatched it away from us is, in my view, a
positive result. Far from a big mistake. If you genuinely feel you
don't want it any more, I'm sure that if you offered it for sale you
would have hundreds of people lining up to take it off your hands for
the full price you paid. (You will, of course, have to sell it to only
one person, and remove it from your own PC).

2. The fact that CE2000 refuses to import a file created by Feurio is
surprising. What format do you expect that file to be in? In my
experience, CE2000 successfully reads a wide variety of file formats,
and even if it can't recognise the header, it will allow you to import
it "raw" by explicitly saying what the word depth, sample rate, etc
are.

3. Unless you need multi-track capability, I don't really see what the
point would be of upgrading to Adobe Audition.

4. Your point about support is a good one. Adobe have not done the
decent thing, here.

On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 23:48:24 GMT, "Howard Davis"
wrote:

A few months ago - in July - I purchased Cool Edit 2000 from Syntrillium
Software.
BIG MISTAKE!

I used it one time, along with Feurio CD Manager, to do post-production work
on a studio recorded master. It took a bit of time but I was successful. Now
I am attempting to use it again, but it appears defective, unable to import
files from Feurio.

Seeking support on the linked website, I'm told that Adobe Systems purchased
the "technology assets" of Syntrillium last May (before I bought the
software), has discontinued Cool Edit 2000, and does not support it. They do
however sell an upgrade for $99, or their new Adobe Audition for $299!

This is a ripoff. I paid for this software just a few months ago. I should
be entitled to either tech support or at least a partial refund for its
becoming defective so soon.

OK, there are many issues raised here, and my opinions won't seem to
be congruent with others who have posted here, but bear with me....

1. CE2000 is probably the finest 2-channel audio editor that was ever
available at a reasonable price. The fact that you managed to acquire
a copy briefly before Adobe snatched it away from us is, in my view, a
positive result. Far from a big mistake. If you genuinely feel you
don't want it any more, I'm sure that if you offered it for sale you
would have hundreds of people lining up to take it off your hands for
the full price you paid. (You will, of course, have to sell it to only
one person, and remove it from your own PC).

2. The fact that CE2000 refuses to import a file created by Feurio is
surprising. What format do you expect that file to be in? In my
experience, CE2000 successfully reads a wide variety of file formats,
and even if it can't recognise the header, it will allow you to import
it "raw" by explicitly saying what the word depth, sample rate, etc
are.

3. Unless you need multi-track capability, I don't really see what the
point would be of upgrading to Adobe Audition.

4. Your point about support is a good one. Adobe have not done the
decent thing, here.

"Howard Davis" wrote in message

A few months ago - in July - I purchased Cool Edit 2000 from
Syntrillium Software.
BIG MISTAKE!

I used it one time, along with Feurio CD Manager, to do
post-production work on a studio recorded master. It took a bit of
time but I was successful. Now I am attempting to use it again, but
it appears defective, unable to import files from Feurio.

How do you know that the problem isn't Feurio's fault or a fault of your
procedures?

What sort of support are you getting from the people who support Feurio?

"Howard Davis" wrote in message

A few months ago - in July - I purchased Cool Edit 2000 from
Syntrillium Software.
BIG MISTAKE!

I used it one time, along with Feurio CD Manager, to do
post-production work on a studio recorded master. It took a bit of
time but I was successful. Now I am attempting to use it again, but
it appears defective, unable to import files from Feurio.

How do you know that the problem isn't Feurio's fault or a fault of your
procedures?

What sort of support are you getting from the people who support Feurio?

Recently, posted:

The $99 upgrade to Audition is a bargain. Although it's billed as a
new name for CE pro, it actually has many improvements over the final
version of CE pro and, in my environment, I find these improvements
very valuable and welcome.

Could you elaborate on this a bit? As a CEP 2.1 user, I've downloaded
Audition, but haven't installed it because I understand that Adobe
extracted the CD burning tool, for one. That seems like a "downgrade" to
me. However, if there are really improvements over CEP 2.1, I may be
tempted to go ahead and try it out.

Regards,

Neil

Recently, posted:

The $99 upgrade to Audition is a bargain. Although it's billed as a
new name for CE pro, it actually has many improvements over the final
version of CE pro and, in my environment, I find these improvements
very valuable and welcome.

Could you elaborate on this a bit? As a CEP 2.1 user, I've downloaded
Audition, but haven't installed it because I understand that Adobe
extracted the CD burning tool, for one. That seems like a "downgrade" to
me. However, if there are really improvements over CEP 2.1, I may be
tempted to go ahead and try it out.

Regards,

Neil

Recently, Clive Backham posted:

I agree with your points with the exception of these:

3. Unless you need multi-track capability, I don't really see what the
point would be of upgrading to Adobe Audition.

Since you don't *lose* capability by going with Audition, what you *gain*
is continued support for an application that is still alive. It's
completely possible to use Audition without ever seeing the multi-track
view. Sure, CE2000 is a great app. CEP / Audition is better, and the
upgrade price from Adobe is quite generous. In short, you'll get an app
that you won't be able to beat for $1,000 for under $200 total.

4. Your point about support is a good one. Adobe have not done the
decent thing, here.

I disagree completely with this. It more than likely was the deal that was
struck between Syntrillium and Adobe that short-changed the CE2000
community. As Adobe wasn't interested in CE2000, Syntrillium may have been
able to retain that app along with the utilities that also got dumped.
However, continued support and/or development may not have been possible
without the technology that went into CEP. So, they were between a rock
and a hard place. It's not about being "decent".

So, those insisting that CE2000 is/was all they ever needed have but to
retain their copies of that app. It will do everythinig it ever did into
the foreseable future.

Neil

Recently, Clive Backham posted:

I agree with your points with the exception of these:

3. Unless you need multi-track capability, I don't really see what the
point would be of upgrading to Adobe Audition.

Since you don't *lose* capability by going with Audition, what you *gain*
is continued support for an application that is still alive. It's
completely possible to use Audition without ever seeing the multi-track
view. Sure, CE2000 is a great app. CEP / Audition is better, and the
upgrade price from Adobe is quite generous. In short, you'll get an app
that you won't be able to beat for $1,000 for under $200 total.

4. Your point about support is a good one. Adobe have not done the
decent thing, here.

I disagree completely with this. It more than likely was the deal that was
struck between Syntrillium and Adobe that short-changed the CE2000
community. As Adobe wasn't interested in CE2000, Syntrillium may have been
able to retain that app along with the utilities that also got dumped.
However, continued support and/or development may not have been possible
without the technology that went into CEP. So, they were between a rock
and a hard place. It's not about being "decent".

So, those insisting that CE2000 is/was all they ever needed have but to
retain their copies of that app. It will do everythinig it ever did into
the foreseable future.

Neil

"Neil Gould" wrote in message
link.net

Recently, posted:

The $99 upgrade to Audition is a bargain. Although it's billed as a
new name for CE pro, it actually has many improvements over the final
version of CE pro and, in my environment, I find these improvements
very valuable and welcome.

There may be *improvements*, but the one that is most visible to me is the
Adobe name, which I value at about $0.00.

Could you elaborate on this a bit? As a CEP 2.1 user, I've downloaded
Audition, but haven't installed it because I understand that Adobe
extracted the CD burning tool, for one.

Well, the CD burning tool was beta-test, and it is a little rough around the
edges. That all said I've swum past the rough edges and use it routinely for
mastering new work.

That seems like a "downgrade" to me.

I was hoping that Adobe with all their great programming and system analysis
resources would take the beta test burner "all the way" to production, but
that didn't happen. Yet. It may never happen, or it may. Who knows?

However, if there are really improvements over CEP 2.1, I may
be tempted to go ahead and try it out.

I've got both and use both interchangeably, except of course I have to
account for the deletion of the beta CD burning tool from Audition.

"Neil Gould" wrote in message
link.net

Recently, posted:

The $99 upgrade to Audition is a bargain. Although it's billed as a
new name for CE pro, it actually has many improvements over the final
version of CE pro and, in my environment, I find these improvements
very valuable and welcome.

There may be *improvements*, but the one that is most visible to me is the
Adobe name, which I value at about $0.00.

Could you elaborate on this a bit? As a CEP 2.1 user, I've downloaded
Audition, but haven't installed it because I understand that Adobe
extracted the CD burning tool, for one.

Well, the CD burning tool was beta-test, and it is a little rough around the
edges. That all said I've swum past the rough edges and use it routinely for
mastering new work.

That seems like a "downgrade" to me.

I was hoping that Adobe with all their great programming and system analysis
resources would take the beta test burner "all the way" to production, but
that didn't happen. Yet. It may never happen, or it may. Who knows?

However, if there are really improvements over CEP 2.1, I may
be tempted to go ahead and try it out.

I've got both and use both interchangeably, except of course I have to
account for the deletion of the beta CD burning tool from Audition.

"Neil Gould" wrote in message
hlink.net


It more than likely was the deal
that was struck between Syntrillium and Adobe that short-changed the
CE2000 community.

At least in the short term. Adobe could turn around and re-release CE2000 as
"Audition Lite" or some such. They've got a track record for doing such a
thing.

As Adobe wasn't interested in CE2000, Syntrillium
may have been able to retain that app along with the utilities that
also got dumped.

The early news releases sounded to me like that might be in the offing. I
seem to recall reading words like: Buy the technology. But in the end, it
seems to me like Adobe bought Syntrillium lock, stock and barrel. The
earlier statements might have had the purpose of *helping* the negotiations.
They were no doubt true, but there are shadings of meanings...

However, continued support and/or development may
not have been possible without the technology that went into CEP. So,
they were between a rock and a hard place. It's not about being
"decent".

This sort of thing is known as "A Business Decision". Sometimes an oxymoron,
nevertheless, stuff happens.

So, those insisting that CE2000 is/was all they ever needed have but
to retain their copies of that app. It will do everything it ever
did into the foreseeable future.

Yup, although the upgrade paths that used to cost like $30 and up got
coalesced into one big bite at $99.

"Neil Gould" wrote in message
hlink.net


It more than likely was the deal
that was struck between Syntrillium and Adobe that short-changed the
CE2000 community.

At least in the short term. Adobe could turn around and re-release CE2000 as
"Audition Lite" or some such. They've got a track record for doing such a
thing.

As Adobe wasn't interested in CE2000, Syntrillium
may have been able to retain that app along with the utilities that
also got dumped.

The early news releases sounded to me like that might be in the offing. I
seem to recall reading words like: Buy the technology. But in the end, it
seems to me like Adobe bought Syntrillium lock, stock and barrel. The
earlier statements might have had the purpose of *helping* the negotiations.
They were no doubt true, but there are shadings of meanings...

However, continued support and/or development may
not have been possible without the technology that went into CEP. So,
they were between a rock and a hard place. It's not about being
"decent".

This sort of thing is known as "A Business Decision". Sometimes an oxymoron,
nevertheless, stuff happens.

So, those insisting that CE2000 is/was all they ever needed have but
to retain their copies of that app. It will do everything it ever
did into the foreseeable future.

Yup, although the upgrade paths that used to cost like $30 and up got
coalesced into one big bite at $99.

Recently, Arny Krueger posted:

"Neil Gould" wrote in message
Could you elaborate on this a bit? As a CEP 2.1 user, I've downloaded
Audition, but haven't installed it because I understand that Adobe
extracted the CD burning tool, for one.

Well, the CD burning tool was beta-test, and it is a little rough
around the edges. That all said I've swum past the rough edges and
use it routinely for mastering new work.

Same here, except that I haven't found rough edges so much as a paradigm
shift in the way that it works compared to other products. That said, its
integration into CEP is marvelous, as I can go straight from full 32-bit
mixes to CD in one step, with all my preferences for SRC applied on the
fly. I don't to want lose that capability unless compensated by some other
"must haves" that make it worth the extra effort. So far, I haven't
discovered those "improvements", hence my question.

I've got both and use both interchangeably, except of course I have to
account for the deletion of the beta CD burning tool from Audition.

So, there is no problem with having both installed simultaneously? If
that's true, I may go ahead and do so just to get familiar with it.

Regards,

Neil

Recently, Arny Krueger posted:

"Neil Gould" wrote in message
Could you elaborate on this a bit? As a CEP 2.1 user, I've downloaded
Audition, but haven't installed it because I understand that Adobe
extracted the CD burning tool, for one.

Well, the CD burning tool was beta-test, and it is a little rough
around the edges. That all said I've swum past the rough edges and
use it routinely for mastering new work.

Same here, except that I haven't found rough edges so much as a paradigm
shift in the way that it works compared to other products. That said, its
integration into CEP is marvelous, as I can go straight from full 32-bit
mixes to CD in one step, with all my preferences for SRC applied on the
fly. I don't to want lose that capability unless compensated by some other
"must haves" that make it worth the extra effort. So far, I haven't
discovered those "improvements", hence my question.

I've got both and use both interchangeably, except of course I have to
account for the deletion of the beta CD burning tool from Audition.

So, there is no problem with having both installed simultaneously? If
that's true, I may go ahead and do so just to get familiar with it.

Regards,

Neil

"Neil Gould" wrote in message
hlink.net
Recently, Arny Krueger posted:

I've got both and use both interchangeably, except of course I have
to account for the deletion of the beta CD burning tool from
Audition.

So, there is no problem with having both installed simultaneously? If
that's true, I may go ahead and do so just to get familiar with it.

The only place they interfere that I know of is that setting changes in
Audition seem to show up in CEP 2.1 and vice-versa. That's either a bug or a
feature depending on your preferences.

"Neil Gould" wrote in message
hlink.net
Recently, Arny Krueger posted:

I've got both and use both interchangeably, except of course I have
to account for the deletion of the beta CD burning tool from
Audition.

So, there is no problem with having both installed simultaneously? If
that's true, I may go ahead and do so just to get familiar with it.

The only place they interfere that I know of is that setting changes in
Audition seem to show up in CEP 2.1 and vice-versa. That's either a bug or a
feature depending on your preferences.

"Trevor Wilson" wrote in message


**Yeah, like that'll bother them. I dropped 600 Bucks on a
(reasonably) high end video card, a few years ago.

Video cards are a very volatile market. Also people should note that this is
$Au, not $US. Exchange is something around 2:1.

The company never
released decent drivers for the damned card. I swore that I would
never buy a Diamond product ever again. Like that worried them. I
gave up and bought an 80 Dollar card which performed better, around
18 months later.

There is some justice.

Try finding a new model Diamond video card for sale. AFAIK, mission
impossible.

If I've got this right, Diamond changed their name to Sonic Blue and now
mostly pump MP3 players.

"Trevor Wilson" wrote in message


**Yeah, like that'll bother them. I dropped 600 Bucks on a
(reasonably) high end video card, a few years ago.

Video cards are a very volatile market. Also people should note that this is
$Au, not $US. Exchange is something around 2:1.

The company never
released decent drivers for the damned card. I swore that I would
never buy a Diamond product ever again. Like that worried them. I
gave up and bought an 80 Dollar card which performed better, around
18 months later.

There is some justice.

Try finding a new model Diamond video card for sale. AFAIK, mission
impossible.

If I've got this right, Diamond changed their name to Sonic Blue and now
mostly pump MP3 players.

On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 08:27:10 GMT, (Clive
Backham) wrote:

2. The fact that CE2000 refuses to import a file created by Feurio is
surprising. What format do you expect that file to be in?

Feurio is a CD writing program specialized on audio CDs and operates
on two different files, the music, which is contained in wav files and
the other file type is the project file, which is called cue sheet in
some other programs.

If we get some more information about the files that CE2000 refuses
to read, we can provide more help.

Norbert

On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 08:27:10 GMT, (Clive
Backham) wrote:

2. The fact that CE2000 refuses to import a file created by Feurio is
surprising. What format do you expect that file to be in?

Feurio is a CD writing program specialized on audio CDs and operates
on two different files, the music, which is contained in wav files and
the other file type is the project file, which is called cue sheet in
some other programs.

If we get some more information about the files that CE2000 refuses
to read, we can provide more help.

Norbert

On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 08:41:43 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

The only place they interfere that I know of is that setting changes in
Audition seem to show up in CEP 2.1 and vice-versa. That's either a bug or a
feature depending on your preferences.

That's somehow strange as CEP 2.1 stores the settings in the environ-
ment of the user (at least in Windows XP) in the folder

Application Data - Syntrillium - Cooledit Pro - 2.1 - cool.ini,
coolcust.ini etc. while Audion settings are stored in

Application Data - Adobe - Audition - 1.0 - Audcust.ini etc.

Other data is stored in the Registry, but different keywords are used
there as well. The only major difference I found between the programs
is the different naming of the native board - I have to use the system
clipboard to copy data between the two.

I use both programs quite often, usually one active instance of each.
As both programms look somewhat different, it's easier for me the see
which program is active when I switch programs.

I've never missed the CD burning capabilites of CEP as I use Feurio
for that. It has lots of features to assist in layouting the CD. Otoh
I seldom use the track editor of Feurio which is rather simple.

Norbert

On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 08:41:43 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

The only place they interfere that I know of is that setting changes in
Audition seem to show up in CEP 2.1 and vice-versa. That's either a bug or a
feature depending on your preferences.

That's somehow strange as CEP 2.1 stores the settings in the environ-
ment of the user (at least in Windows XP) in the folder

Application Data - Syntrillium - Cooledit Pro - 2.1 - cool.ini,
coolcust.ini etc. while Audion settings are stored in

Application Data - Adobe - Audition - 1.0 - Audcust.ini etc.

Other data is stored in the Registry, but different keywords are used
there as well. The only major difference I found between the programs
is the different naming of the native board - I have to use the system
clipboard to copy data between the two.

I use both programs quite often, usually one active instance of each.
As both programms look somewhat different, it's easier for me the see
which program is active when I switch programs.

I've never missed the CD burning capabilites of CEP as I use Feurio
for that. It has lots of features to assist in layouting the CD. Otoh
I seldom use the track editor of Feurio which is rather simple.

Norbert

"Norbert Hahn" wrote in message

On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 08:41:43 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

The only place they interfere that I know of is that setting changes
in Audition seem to show up in CEP 2.1 and vice-versa. That's either
a bug or a feature depending on your preferences.

That's somehow strange as CEP 2.1 stores the settings in the environ-
ment of the user (at least in Windows XP) in the folder

Application Data - Syntrillium - Cooledit Pro - 2.1 - cool.ini,
coolcust.ini etc. while Audion settings are stored in

Application Data - Adobe - Audition - 1.0 - Audcust.ini etc.


Yeah, I'm aware of that, so that's why I've been scratching my head. Thanks
for confirming my analysis.

Other data is stored in the Registry, but different keywords are used
there as well. The only major difference I found between the programs
is the different naming of the native board - I have to use the system
clipboard to copy data between the two.

Agreed.

I use both programs quite often, usually one active instance of each.
As both programms look somewhat different, it's easier for me the see
which program is active when I switch programs.

I generally use one at a time, but yes they do run side-by-side for me, too.

I've never missed the CD burning capabilities of CEP as I use Feurio
for that. It has lots of features to assist in layouting the CD. Otoh
I seldom use the track editor of Feurio which is rather simple.

It's been a while since I last used Feurio. It's nice when CD interfaces are
built into the tool (e.g., Apple iTunes) - and CEP 2.1 + the beta burner did
that. I hope it's coming back.

"Norbert Hahn" wrote in message

On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 08:41:43 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

The only place they interfere that I know of is that setting changes
in Audition seem to show up in CEP 2.1 and vice-versa. That's either
a bug or a feature depending on your preferences.

That's somehow strange as CEP 2.1 stores the settings in the environ-
ment of the user (at least in Windows XP) in the folder

Application Data - Syntrillium - Cooledit Pro - 2.1 - cool.ini,
coolcust.ini etc. while Audion settings are stored in

Application Data - Adobe - Audition - 1.0 - Audcust.ini etc.


Yeah, I'm aware of that, so that's why I've been scratching my head. Thanks
for confirming my analysis.

Other data is stored in the Registry, but different keywords are used
there as well. The only major difference I found between the programs
is the different naming of the native board - I have to use the system
clipboard to copy data between the two.

Agreed.

I use both programs quite often, usually one active instance of each.
As both programms look somewhat different, it's easier for me the see
which program is active when I switch programs.

I generally use one at a time, but yes they do run side-by-side for me, too.

I've never missed the CD burning capabilities of CEP as I use Feurio
for that. It has lots of features to assist in layouting the CD. Otoh
I seldom use the track editor of Feurio which is rather simple.

It's been a while since I last used Feurio. It's nice when CD interfaces are
built into the tool (e.g., Apple iTunes) - and CEP 2.1 + the beta burner did
that. I hope it's coming back.

"Trevor Wilson" wrote in message ...
I swore that I would never buy a Diamond product ever
again. Like that worried them.

Well... where is Diamond today? I think the answer is "nowhere".

"Trevor Wilson" wrote in message ...
I swore that I would never buy a Diamond product ever
again. Like that worried them.

Well... where is Diamond today? I think the answer is "nowhere".

Arny Krueger ) in article 0aidnXvERZJGTQqiRVn-
wrote:

There is some justice.

Try finding a new model Diamond video card for sale. AFAIK, mission
impossible.

If I've got this right, Diamond changed their name to Sonic Blue and now
mostly pump MP3 players.


I believe Diamond has been around since the early 80's, and well
regarded by many in its day. They're perhaps best known by many these
days for defending themselves against the RIAA, who sued them
[unsuccessfully] a few years ago to try and prevent the release of the
Diamond Rio mp3 player.

I don't know all the details, but they've had problems and AFAIK, got
bought out by S3 maybe 5 years ago, and S3's name was subsequently
changed to Sonic Blue, who filed for bankruptcy this year. I see here
that what remains has apparently being scooped up by Best Data Products,
Digital Networks, and maybe some others: http://www.diamondmm.com

At least they seem to be providing a driver archive for the time being,
which IIRC is an improvement over a few months ago when I was looking
for drivers for a flakey Diamond Supramax modem (with strong resistance
to buying a replacement since its basically just used for faxing once in
a blue moon).

- Brian

Arny Krueger ) in article 0aidnXvERZJGTQqiRVn-
wrote:

There is some justice.

Try finding a new model Diamond video card for sale. AFAIK, mission
impossible.

If I've got this right, Diamond changed their name to Sonic Blue and now
mostly pump MP3 players.


I believe Diamond has been around since the early 80's, and well
regarded by many in its day. They're perhaps best known by many these
days for defending themselves against the RIAA, who sued them
[unsuccessfully] a few years ago to try and prevent the release of the
Diamond Rio mp3 player.

I don't know all the details, but they've had problems and AFAIK, got
bought out by S3 maybe 5 years ago, and S3's name was subsequently
changed to Sonic Blue, who filed for bankruptcy this year. I see here
that what remains has apparently being scooped up by Best Data Products,
Digital Networks, and maybe some others: http://www.diamondmm.com

At least they seem to be providing a driver archive for the time being,
which IIRC is an improvement over a few months ago when I was looking
for drivers for a flakey Diamond Supramax modem (with strong resistance
to buying a replacement since its basically just used for faxing once in
a blue moon).

- Brian

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
news
"Howard Davis" wrote in message

A few months ago - in July - I purchased Cool Edit 2000 from
Syntrillium Software.
BIG MISTAKE!

I used it one time, along with Feurio CD Manager, to do
post-production work on a studio recorded master. It took a bit of
time but I was successful. Now I am attempting to use it again, but
it appears defective, unable to import files from Feurio.

How do you know that the problem isn't Feurio's fault or a fault of your
procedures?

Because I do the same things I did in the past but get no results. I cannot
prove it, but the problem appears to be with Cool Edit 2000.

What sort of support are you getting from the people who support Feurio?

Feurio is FREEware/shareware. I don't expect support for it, but unlike
CoolEdit 2000, which I paid to download (I do not have it on CD), it STILL
WORKS.