Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to alt.guitar.amps,rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
AGW Scammer gets $541K in O'Bunny Stimulus Funds...
Gee, Michael Mann's hockey stick knocked $541K into his
own net....while he's under investigation at Penn State. The bigger you lie, the more O'Bunny pays you, it seems. http://planetgore.nationalreview.com...ExMWUyMDMwYTM= A whole pile of Congresspukes flew to Copenhagen (on the public nickel, of course) and partied hearty in 5-star hotels; flew in on military jets (at $10,000 per hour operational cost - EACH, and there were three or four of 'em...they won't say yet...) - there was so much action, they had to ship in extra limos from Germany to meet the demand. Naturally, a blizzard blew in during the Global Warming shindig...****in' LOSERS, bunch of outright crooks, and they're gonna make you contribute to their goddamn RELIGION whether you want to or not. And now that England and much of Asia are shivering through the coldest winter in thirty years, you can't find Algore with a whole ****in' pack of bloodhounds... probably hiding out in Patagonia counting his carbon credit rakeoffs. http://images.cafepress.com/image/18128827_125x125.jpg Lord Valve Cheerfully posted from the People's Republic of Obamastan (Occupied United States of God Damn America) BaaaaaarrrrrRRRRAAAACCCCCCKKK!! Safety!! O ne B ig A ss M istake, A merica! http://tinyurl.com/cv4mbm (ignorant) Don't forget to nark this fishy post to ! http://www.bikepainter.com/oneanddone.jpg |
#2
Posted to alt.guitar.amps,rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
AGW Scammer gets $541K in O'Bunny Stimulus Funds...
Lord Valve wrote:
Gee, Michael Mann's hockey stick knocked $541K into his own net....while he's under investigation at Penn State. The bigger you lie, the more O'Bunny pays you, it seems. http://planetgore.nationalreview.com...ExMWUyMDMwYTM= A whole pile of Congresspukes flew to Copenhagen (on the public nickel, of course) and partied hearty in 5-star hotels; flew in on military jets (at $10,000 per hour operational cost - EACH, and there were three or four of 'em...they won't say yet...) - there was so much action, they had to ship in extra limos from Germany to meet the demand. Naturally, a blizzard blew in during the Global Warming shindig...****in' LOSERS, bunch of outright crooks, and they're gonna make you contribute to their goddamn RELIGION whether you want to or not. And now that England and much of Asia are shivering through the coldest winter in thirty years, you can't find Algore with a whole ****in' pack of bloodhounds... probably hiding out in Patagonia counting his carbon credit rakeoffs. ^ | | | THIS is your brain on drugs. |
#3
Posted to alt.guitar.amps,rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
AGW Scammer gets $541K in O'Bunny Stimulus Funds...
On Jan 14, 3:24*pm, Lord Valve wrote:
Gee, Michael Mann's hockey stick knocked $541K into his own net....while he's under investigation at Penn State. The bigger you lie, the more O'Bunny pays you, it seems. http://planetgore.nationalreview.com...AxNTNlNDljNTM2.... A whole pile of Congresspukes flew to Copenhagen (on the public nickel, of course) and partied hearty in 5-star hotels; flew in on military jets (at $10,000 per hour operational cost - EACH, and there were three or four of 'em...they won't say yet...) *- there was so much action, they had to ship in extra limos from Germany to meet the demand. *Naturally, a blizzard blew in during the Global Warming shindig...****in' LOSERS, bunch of outright crooks, and they're gonna make you contribute to their goddamn RELIGION whether you want to or not. *And now that England and much of Asia are shivering through the coldest winter in thirty years, you can't find Algore with a whole ****in' pack of bloodhounds... probably hiding out in Patagonia counting his carbon credit rakeoffs. http://images.cafepress.com/image/18128827_125x125.jpg Lord Valve Cheerfully posted from the People's Republic of Obamastan (Occupied United States of God Damn America) BaaaaaarrrrrRRRRAAAACCCCCCKKK!! *Safety!! O ne B ig A ss M istake, A merica! http://tinyurl.com/cv4mbm*(ignorant) Don't forget to nark this fishy post to ! http://www.bikepainter.com/oneanddone.jpg Al Gore is in storage until the many frozen landscapes around the world thaw. If the groundhog doesn't see his shadow this year, I think it's safe to say Al will develop cabin fever. :-) He is, however, actively emailing his followers and encouraging them to support EPA action on carbon dioxide emissions. He doesn't want his frost-bitten lips to detract from the debate. Oh, I forgot...there is no debate. Science has been settled. |
#4
Posted to alt.guitar.amps,rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
AGW Scammer gets $541K in O'Bunny Stimulus Funds...
RichL submitted this idea :
Lord Valve wrote: Gee, Michael Mann's hockey stick knocked $541K into his own net....while he's under investigation at Penn State. The bigger you lie, the more O'Bunny pays you, it seems. http://planetgore.nationalreview.com...ExMWUyMDMwYTM= A whole pile of Congresspukes flew to Copenhagen (on the public nickel, of course) and partied hearty in 5-star hotels; flew in on military jets (at $10,000 per hour operational cost - EACH, and there were three or four of 'em...they won't say yet...) - there was so much action, they had to ship in extra limos from Germany to meet the demand. Naturally, a blizzard blew in during the Global Warming shindig...****in' LOSERS, bunch of outright crooks, and they're gonna make you contribute to their goddamn RELIGION whether you want to or not. And now that England and much of Asia are shivering through the coldest winter in thirty years, you can't find Algore with a whole ****in' pack of bloodhounds... probably hiding out in Patagonia counting his carbon credit rakeoffs. ^ | | | THIS is your brain on drugs. ^ | | | This is your sense of humor Whinging. |
#5
Posted to alt.guitar.amps,rec.audio.tubes,rec.bicycles.tech
|
|||
|
|||
AGW Scammer gets $541K in O'Bunny Stimulus Funds...
ing being kept firmly in place.
Furthermore, politics is a log-rolling exercise. A politician who wants to be elected doesn't actually stand for anything; instead he stands for whatever little groups of 5 per cent of the population believes in. If he rolls up enough of those five per cent logs, he is elected. The global warmie faithful, who don't care that global warming is a hoax and a fraud, surely amount to at least 5 per cent of the voters. That's not all. Nothing unifies people so much as a common enemy. That's why shaky South American dictators invent wars to stay in power a few years longer, why Western pols so enthusiastically embraced the "War on Terror" which in reality is war against a few old ideologues who need help wiping their own arses. (The Twin Towers was a pinprick; more women than the complete 9/11 death toll are raped and killed every day in Somalia. In the larger terrorism perspective, the only significance of 9/11 is that it happened on American soil and frightened a hitherto arrogantly uncaring nation ****less by the realization that distance would no longer protect them from the stupidities of their leaders.) Now they have the War on Global Warming, which everyone is supposed to think is a Good Thing, and Scientific besides. (And the arguments against it on either scientific or moral grounds take some brains to follow, so global warming is an easy tool for racking up mass hysteria.) Anyone who thinks the pols will give up such a superb handle on their populace is a wishful thinker. QED. Andre Jute Visit Jute on Amps at http://www.audio-talk.co.uk/fiultra/ "wonderfully well written and reasoned information for the tube audio constructor" John Broskie TubeCAD & GlassWare "an unbelievably comprehensive web site containing vital gems of wisdom" Stuart Perry Hi-Fi News & Record Review |
#6
Posted to alt.guitar.amps,rec.audio.tubes,rec.bicycles.tech
|
|||
|
|||
AGW Scammer gets $541K in O'Bunny Stimulus Funds...
Half of your rant is missing - re-post? LV Andre Jute wrote: ing being kept firmly in place. Furthermore, politics is a log-rolling exercise. A politician who wants to be elected doesn't actually stand for anything; instead he stands for whatever little groups of 5 per cent of the population believes in. If he rolls up enough of those five per cent logs, he is elected. The global warmie faithful, who don't care that global warming is a hoax and a fraud, surely amount to at least 5 per cent of the voters. That's not all. Nothing unifies people so much as a common enemy. That's why shaky South American dictators invent wars to stay in power a few years longer, why Western pols so enthusiastically embraced the "War on Terror" which in reality is war against a few old ideologues who need help wiping their own arses. (The Twin Towers was a pinprick; more women than the complete 9/11 death toll are raped and killed every day in Somalia. In the larger terrorism perspective, the only significance of 9/11 is that it happened on American soil and frightened a hitherto arrogantly uncaring nation ****less by the realization that distance would no longer protect them from the stupidities of their leaders.) Now they have the War on Global Warming, which everyone is supposed to think is a Good Thing, and Scientific besides. (And the arguments against it on either scientific or moral grounds take some brains to follow, so global warming is an easy tool for racking up mass hysteria.) Anyone who thinks the pols will give up such a superb handle on their populace is a wishful thinker. QED. Andre Jute Visit Jute on Amps at http://www.audio-talk.co.uk/fiultra/ "wonderfully well written and reasoned information for the tube audio constructor" John Broskie TubeCAD & GlassWare "an unbelievably comprehensive web site containing vital gems of wisdom" Stuart Perry Hi-Fi News & Record Review |
#7
Posted to alt.guitar.amps,rec.audio.tubes,rec.bicycles.tech
|
|||
|
|||
AGW Scammer gets $541K in O'Bunny Stimulus Funds...
On Jan 15, 6:55*pm, Lord Valve wrote:
Half of your rant is missing - re-post? LV Ah, looks like my wisdom was lost in translation. Again. I pointed out that giving more tax payers' money to the exposed cheat Michael Mann is probably the White House sending a message to prosecutors that if the President's favourite global warming bumbuddy is convicted, he will be pardoned. The lost part of my missive further concerned the obvious fact that the current crop of western pols in office cannot admit that manmade global warming, indeed global warming of any kind, is a political hoax and scientific fraud. For one thing, when was the last time you ever heard them admit to having made a mistake. For another, the taxes raised on CO2 has already been factored in, and it would administratively and politically impossible to disentangle now. If you want reversals of these deeply damaging, pointless policies, I suggest you stand a better chance working on those pols now in opposition who are most likely to topple the clowns who have bought into, or claimed to have bought into, global warming. Then I continued: Furthermore, politics is a log-rolling exercise. A politician who wants to be elected doesn't actually stand for anything; instead he stands for whatever little groups of 5 per cent of the population believes in. If he rolls up enough of those five per cent logs, he is elected. The global warmie faithful, who don't care that global warming is a hoax and a fraud, surely amount to at least 5 per cent of the voters. That's not all. Nothing unifies people so much as a common enemy. That's why shaky South American dictators invent wars to stay in power a few years longer, why Western pols so enthusiastically embraced the "War on Terror" which in reality is war against a few old ideologues who need help wiping their own arses. (The Twin Towers was a pinprick; more women than the complete 9/11 death toll are raped and killed every day in Somalia. In the larger terrorism perspective, the only significance of 9/11 is that it happened on American soil and frightened a hitherto arrogantly uncaring nation ****less by the realization that distance would no longer protect them from the stupidities of their leaders.) Now they have the War on Global Warming, which everyone is supposed to think is a Good Thing, and Scientific besides. (And the arguments against it on either scientific or moral grounds take some brains to follow, so global warming is an easy tool for racking up mass hysteria.) Anyone who thinks the pols will give up such a superb handle on their populace is a wishful thinker. QED. Andre Jute Visit Jute on Amps at *http://www.audio-talk.co.uk/fiultra/ "wonderfully well written and reasoned information for the tube audio constructor" John Broskie TubeCAD & GlassWare "an unbelievably comprehensive web site containing vital gems of wisdom" Stuart Perry Hi-Fi News & Record Review |
#8
Posted to alt.guitar.amps,rec.audio.tubes,rec.bicycles.tech
|
|||
|
|||
AGW Scammer gets $541K in O'Bunny Stimulus Funds...
In article ,
Lord Valve wrote: Half of your rant is missing - re-post? Why? Twice as much **** is still ****. -- "I wear the cheese, it does not wear me." |
#9
Posted to alt.guitar.amps,rec.audio.tubes,rec.bicycles.tech
|
|||
|
|||
AGW Scammer gets $541K in O'Bunny Stimulus Funds...
Andre Jute wrote:
On Jan 15, 6:55 pm, Lord Valve wrote: Half of your rant is missing - re-post? LV Ah, looks like my wisdom was lost in translation. Again.[...] TLDR. -- Tom Sherman - 42.435731,-83.985007 |
#10
Posted to alt.guitar.amps,rec.audio.tubes,rec.bicycles.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Global Warming Researcher gets $541K in Obama Stimulus Funds...
* Still Just Me * wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:13:09 -0800 (PST), Andre Jute wrote: I pointed out that giving more tax payers' money to the exposed cheat Michael Mann WTF business is it of yours what US taxpayers do with their money? Has Mr. Jute ever had an opinion he did not want to share? -- Tom Sherman - 42.435731,-83.985007 |
#11
Posted to alt.guitar.amps,rec.audio.tubes,rec.bicycles.tech
|
|||
|
|||
AGW Scammer Michael Mann gets $541K in O'Bunny Stimulus Funds...
On Jan 19, 7:00*pm, * Still Just Me *
wrote: On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:13:09 -0800 (PST), Andre Jute wrote: I pointed out that giving more tax payers' money to the exposed cheat Michael Mann WTF business is it of yours what US taxpayers do with their money? Everyone who owns shares in a US corporation is a US taxpayer, you ignoramus. Everyone who licenses intellectual rights sooner or later is a US taxpayer, you ignoramus. Furthermore, the lies the scammer Michael Mann told were told on behalf of the world body, the UN, and those lies caused policies which cost taxpayers elsewhere, so the overturn of the liar Michael Mann's hockey stick, and the exposure and punishment of the fraudster Michael Mann is a matter for everyone on earth. Let's see Still Just Me, gross ignorance again: WTF business is it of yours what US taxpayers do with their money? Those other two clowns, Liddell Tommi Sherman and Jobst "I'm never wrong" Brandt agreed wholeheartedly with Still Just Stupid's gross ignorance. I'll deal with them separately. Unsigned out of contempt for a blustering moron. |
#12
Posted to alt.guitar.amps,rec.audio.tubes,rec.bicycles.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Global Warming Researcher gets $541K in Obama Stimulus Funds...
On Jan 20, 2:16*am, Tom Sherman °_°
wrote: * Still Just Me * wrote: On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:13:09 -0800 (PST), Andre Jute wrote: I pointed out that giving more tax payers' money to the exposed cheat Michael Mann WTF business is it of yours what US taxpayers do with their money? Has Mr. Jute ever had an opinion he did not want to share? Tell us, Liddell Tommi, where's the opinion I'm supposed to be sharing in this: I pointed out that giving more tax payers' money to the exposed cheat Michael Mann. Those are just the agreed facts, that Michael Mann is an exposed cheat and fraud who should be jailed for theft and drummed out of the once honorable profession of science. Until you get some grasp of the English language, dear Tommi, you should stick to writing instruction sheets for bricklayers and not expose your ignorance and your soundbite mind by sniping at your betters on subjects you clearly do not grasp too well. Andre Jute Global Warming is like Scientology, only with less science -- and I said it long before the Climategate exposed those clowns as crooks |
#13
Posted to alt.guitar.amps,rec.audio.tubes,rec.bicycles.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Another Childish Tantrum from Jobst "I'm Never Wrong" Brandt
On Jan 20, 3:16*am, Jobst Brandt wrote:
Tom Sherman wrote: I pointed out that giving more tax payers' money to the exposed cheat Michael Mann. WTF business is it of yours what US taxpayers do with their money? Has Mr. Jute ever had an opinion he did not want to share? That's not so bad, Poor Jobst "I'm never Wrong" Brandt is here agreeing with the dire ignorance of economics of the moron Still Just Stupid, as I explained elsewhere in this thread. Poor Jobst "I'm never Wrong" Brandt is further agreeing with the silly miscomprehension by the quarterwit soundbiter Tommi Sherman that I expressed an opinion in the text quoted, I pointed out that giving more tax payers' money to the exposed cheat Michael Mann. Nope, I was merely enumerating the oft-proven and now axiomatic fact that Mann is a cheat and a fraud and has been repeatedly exposed. Not that the facts ever bother Jobst "I'm never Wrong" Brandt much. but most of them have no technical basis. I've been on RBT two years and in that time Jobst "I'm Never Wrong" Brandt has deigned to engage me in technical discussion exactly once. On every other occasion he issued sneering obiter dicta from his ivory tower, then ran away like a whole Ministry of Shambling Pensioners. Bicycling is full of unbiased lore and demands critique, but just blurting it out without some reasonable proof is not worth the effort other than to belittle others. Jobst Brandt On the single occasion that he did deign to discuss technicalities with me, I demonstrated conclusively that Jobst Brandt's book The Bicycle Wheel is so badly executed that in the key passage on which all the rest depends, Brandt contradicts the key drawing on which all the rest depends. Either the text or the drawing must be wrong. I demonstrated furthermore that Brandt knew this through three editions and several reprints and dishonestly did not correct the error despite repeatedly being told of it by baffled readers. Instead he abused them personally for daring to question his greatness. Throwing childish tantrums, running around with little gangbangers like Still Just Stupid and Liddell Tommi Sherman, kicking intellectuals merely because they wear spectacles, should be beneath your dignity, Jobst. Why isn't it? Andre Jute I know what I'm doing. Do you? |
#14
Posted to alt.guitar.amps,rec.audio.tubes,rec.bicycles.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Another Childish Tantrum from Jobst "I'm Never Wrong" Brandt
On 20 Jan, 12:57, Andre Jute wrote:
On the single occasion that he did deign to discuss technicalities with me, I demonstrated conclusively that Jobst Brandt's book The Bicycle Wheel is so badly executed that in the key passage on which all the rest depends, Brandt contradicts the key drawing on which all the rest depends. Either the text or the drawing must be wrong. I demonstrated furthermore that Brandt knew this through three editions and several reprints and dishonestly did not correct the error despite repeatedly being told of it by baffled readers. Instead he abused them personally for daring to question his greatness. Would that be the ommision of the datum line on the spoke tension plot which shows an increase in spoke tension through most of a wheel's cycle? |
#15
Posted to alt.guitar.amps,rec.audio.tubes,rec.bicycles.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Another Childish Tantrum from Jobst "I'm Never Wrong" Brandt
On 20 Jan, 13:06, thirty-six wrote:
On 20 Jan, 12:57, Andre Jute wrote: On the single occasion that he did deign to discuss technicalities with me, I demonstrated conclusively that Jobst Brandt's book The Bicycle Wheel is so badly executed that in the key passage on which all the rest depends, Brandt contradicts the key drawing on which all the rest depends. Either the text or the drawing must be wrong. I demonstrated furthermore that Brandt knew this through three editions and several reprints and dishonestly did not correct the error despite repeatedly being told of it by baffled readers. Instead he abused them personally for daring to question his greatness. Would that be the ommision of the datum line on the spoke tension plot which shows an increase in spoke tension through most of a wheel's cycle? I think I might check out the city library and correct the error on the plot, if they have managed to find it. |
#16
Posted to alt.guitar.amps,rec.audio.tubes,rec.bicycles.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Another Childish Tantrum from Jobst "I'm Never Wrong" Brandt
Jute accused someone of:
Throwing childish tantrums. If we took a vote about the person who does this the most, who do you guess will win by a landslide? Who do you think will likely win the Childish Tantrum Throwing Olimpic Gold medal, the pro tour and the world championships? Who is going to get the Honoris Causa Doctorate in Throwing Childish Tantrums? |
#17
Posted to alt.guitar.amps,rec.audio.tubes,rec.bicycles.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Another Childish Tantrum from Jobst "I'm Never Wrong" Brandt
On Jan 20, 8:02 am, " wrote:
Jute accused someone of: Throwing childish tantrums. ??? "Accused _someone_ of throwing childish tantrums??? No - Jute accused Jobst Brant of "throwing childish tantrums", which is exactly what Brandt does all too often. If we took a vote about the person who does this the most, who do you guess will win by a landslide? Jute might might "win", but not "by a landslide"; Brandt would be a close second (having been unseated in the past two years by Jute, prior to that, he was at the top of the "childish tantrum" list). [...] |
#18
Posted to alt.guitar.amps,rec.audio.tubes,rec.bicycles.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Another Childish Tantrum from Jobst "I'm Never Wrong" Brandt
On Jan 20, 6:02*am, " wrote:
Jute accused someone of: Throwing childish tantrums. If we took a vote about the person who does this the most, who do you guess will win by a landslide? Who do you think will likely win the Childish Tantrum Throwing Olimpic Gold medal, the pro tour and the world championships? Who is going to get the Honoris Causa Doctorate in Throwing Childish Tantrums? Tibeten Monkey.. |
#19
Posted to alt.guitar.amps,rec.audio.tubes,rec.bicycles.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Another Childish Tantrum from Jobst "I'm Never Wrong" Brandt
On Jan 20, 1:06*pm, thirty-six wrote:
On 20 Jan, 12:57, Andre Jute wrote: On the single occasion that he did deign to discuss technicalities with me, I demonstrated conclusively that Jobst Brandt's book The Bicycle Wheel is so badly executed that in the key passage on which all the rest depends, Brandt contradicts the key drawing on which all the rest depends. Either the text or the drawing must be wrong. I demonstrated furthermore that Brandt knew this through three editions and several reprints and dishonestly did not correct the error despite repeatedly being told of it by baffled readers. Instead he abused them personally for daring to question his greatness. Would that be the ommision of the datum line on the spoke tension plot which shows an increase in spoke tension through most of a wheel's cycle? The discussion starts he Hey, Jobst, on p39 of The Bicycle Wheel the graph appears to show the impossibility of... http://groups.google.ie/group/rec.bi...tech &lnk=ol& and continues he Hey Jobst Brandt, Part Deux, about the crook graph on p39 of The Bicycle Wheel http://groups.google.ie/group/rec.bi....bicycles.tech with Jobst Brandt's admission of guilt he The Paradigm of the Ugly Engineer http://groups.google.ie/group/rec.bi...dbeeb56?hl=en& Good luck in picking your way through Brandt's nastiness, and the nastiness of the Brand Bumbuddies. Andre Jute Visit Jute on Bicycles at http://www.audio-talk.co.uk/fiultra/...20CYCLING.html |
#20
Posted to alt.guitar.amps,rec.audio.tubes,rec.bicycles.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Another Childish Tantrum from Jobst "I'm Never Wrong" Brandt
thirty-six wrote:
Andre Jute wrote: On the single occasion that he did deign to discuss technicalities with me, I demonstrated conclusively that Jobst Brandt's book The Bicycle Wheel is so badly executed that in the key passage on which all the rest depends, Brandt contradicts the key drawing on which all the rest depends. [snip] Would that be the ommision of the datum line on the spoke tension plot which shows an increase in spoke tension through most of a wheel's cycle? I think you left out a word: Would that be the ommision [sic] of the datum line on the spoke tension plot which shows an [INSIGNIFICANT] increase in spoke tension through most of a wheel's cycle? have a look at the diagram with delta tension values, and accompanying table, about halfway down the page. http://www.astounding.org.uk/ian/wheel/ Take note that the maximum drop in tension under load is about nine times the maximum rise in tension, and about twenty times the median rise in tension. Which force do you believe to be the more significant in terms of what must be accommodated by the wheel's structure? Please assume Earth units and ambient conditions in making your case. Chalo |
#21
Posted to alt.guitar.amps,rec.audio.tubes,rec.bicycles.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Another Childish Tantrum from Jobst "I'm Never Wrong" Brandt
On 20 Jan, 20:08, Chalo wrote:
thirty-six wrote: Andre Jute wrote: On the single occasion that he did deign to discuss technicalities with me, I demonstrated conclusively that Jobst Brandt's book The Bicycle Wheel is so badly executed that in the key passage on which all the rest depends, Brandt contradicts the key drawing on which all the rest depends. [snip] Would that be the ommision of the datum line on the spoke tension plot which shows an increase in spoke tension through most of a wheel's cycle? I think you left out a word: Would that be the ommision [sic] of the datum line on the spoke tension plot which shows an [INSIGNIFICANT] increase in spoke tension through most of a wheel's cycle? have a look at the diagram with delta tension values, and accompanying table, about halfway down the page. http://www.astounding.org.uk/ian/wheel/ Take note that the maximum drop in tension under load is about nine times the maximum rise in tension, and about twenty times the median rise in tension. *Which force do you believe to be the more significant in terms of what must be accommodated by the wheel's structure? Please assume Earth units and ambient conditions in making your case. Both hypothesis are eroneous. Both ignore crossing of the spokes and dismiss the tying of the spokes as having any effect. It is precisely the extra support given by the additional bracing which permits the lowest spokes to lose all tension without any negative affect to the wheel. The wheel runs well without any tension in the lowest spokes, an infinite factor of magnitude. |
#23
Posted to alt.guitar.amps,rec.audio.tubes,rec.bicycles.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Another Childish Tantrum from André "I'm Never Wrong" Jute
The André Jute wrote:
[...] TLDR -- Tom Sherman - 42.435731,-83.985007 |
#24
Posted to alt.guitar.amps,rec.audio.tubes,rec.bicycles.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Another Childish Tantrum from André "I'm Never Wrong" Jute
Chalo Colina wrote:
[...] Please assume Earth units and ambient conditions in making your case. Trevor appears to be unfamiliar with those conditions. -- Tom Sherman - 42.435731,-83.985007 |
#25
Posted to alt.guitar.amps,rec.audio.tubes,rec.bicycles.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Global Warming Researcher gets $541K in Obama Stimulus Funds...
flipper wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 21:19:40 -0500, * Still Just Me * wrote: On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 04:55:57 -0800 (PST), Andre Jute wrote: Andre Jute Global Warming is like Scientology, only with less science -- and I said it long before the Climategate exposed those clowns as crooks So a couple guys were zealots. It isn't "a couple of guys." It's the head supposed 'gurus' running the premier research, and 'teaching' (read propaganda) facilities, and the IPCC, that produce the data all other researchers use. That still doesn't disprove It's AGW that needs 'proof'. the other 89.99% Fabricated number. Not to mention science is not a popularity poll. of the world's scientists Translation: In AGW speak "scientist" is defined as those who bow to the faith. It's circular. who agree that the planet is warming at an unprecedented rate, Anyone who looks at the historical record knows that isn't true. and the 79.99% Another fabricated number. that agree it's due to man's activities. In science you need a hypothesis, falsified predictions, and experimental validation, none of which AGW has provided. And if you think otherwise then provide them. But go on, get us another TV weatherman who will stand up and tell us differently. We enjoy the humor. The typical AGW argument: No science, just ad hominem. You're insulting Clueless's religious beliefs. Well done! LOL |
#26
Posted to alt.guitar.amps,rec.audio.tubes,rec.bicycles.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Another Childish Tantrum from Tom "I Have No Answers" Sherman
On Jan 20, 11:50*pm, Tom Sherman °_°
wrote: The Andr Jute wrote: [...] TLDR That's all right, Liddell Tommi. By definition no one expects illiterate little gangbangers to be able to read. -- AJ |
#27
Posted to alt.guitar.amps,rec.audio.tubes,rec.bicycles.tech
|
|||
|
|||
AGW Scammer Michael Mann gets $541K in O'Bunny Bribes
On Jan 21, 2:15*am, * Still Just Me *
wrote: On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 04:54:24 -0800 (PST), Andre Jute wrote: On Jan 19, 7:00*pm, * Still Just Me * wrote: On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:13:09 -0800 (PST), Andre Jute wrote: I pointed out that giving more tax payers' money to the exposed cheat Michael Mann WTF business is it of yours what US taxpayers do with their money? Everyone who owns shares in a US corporation is a US taxpayer, you ignoramus. Everyone who licenses intellectual rights sooner or later is a US taxpayer, you ignoramus. * It's still none of your damn business. You deal with foreign investments then you accept the fact that the foreign government will make decisions that impact your investment. You don't like it? Oh dear. What's not to like? US government policy is determined at one or two removes by Arab and Japanese corporations. Giving some money to global warming bumbuddies like Michael Mann is a minor defiance, a pinprick, an occasion for jokes, not important enough to qualify as policy. US fiscal policy has been at the mercy of foreigners since General de Gaulle fixed the value of the dollar by withdrawing France's gold from Fort Knox. (Actually, the key to the decline of the dollar was the French diplomatic coup of selling the nasty little crossbred pup of Indochina to the Americans after it bit the French sorely at Dien Bien Phu; the tall guy in the kepi merely pushed over an empty husk with one finger.) Then stay the hell out. No one invited you and quite frankly, you're not welcome. I've always found the better class of American most welcoming. Whatever makes you think that the opinion of poor white isolationist trash like you should matter to anyone? Furthermore, the lies the scammer Michael Mann told were told on behalf of the world body, the UN, and those lies caused policies which cost taxpayers elsewhere, so the overturn of the liar Michael Mann's hockey stick, and the exposure and punishment of the fraudster Michael Mann is a matter for everyone on earth. Tough ****. You don't like what he says, you send someone else to the UN from your side of the Atlantic to contradict him. Not much point in going there when we can, and have, fixed the liar Michael Mann's wagon from comfortable chairs in Canada and Ireland and India and China and England. The only remaining question is how many of the global warmie fraudsters have to do jail time. You have no right whatsoever to determine what the US spends its money on. What money? The US is owned by the Arabs and the Japanese. Who do you think owns Chrysler? Daimler-Benz AG. And who do you think owns DB? The Saudi Royal Family. Next the Chinese will invest their surplus profits in the States and in a generation will own most of it. You should come to terms with it, sonny. If you're not as thick as you seem, you should learn Mandarin; it will soon be spoken on street corners you once thought of as yours. As usual, you're so offbeam, Still Just Stupid, you're a joke. Unsigned out of contempt |
#28
Posted to alt.guitar.amps,rec.audio.tubes,rec.bicycles.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Global Warming Researcher gets $541K in Obama Stimulus Funds...
On Jan 21, 4:34*am, flipper wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 21:19:40 -0500, * Still Just Me * wrote: On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 04:55:57 -0800 (PST), Andre Jute wrote: Andre Jute Global Warming is like Scientology, only with less science -- and I said it long before the Climategate exposed those clowns as crooks So a couple guys were zealots. It isn't "a couple of guys." It's the head supposed 'gurus' running the premier research, and 'teaching' (read propaganda) facilities, and the IPCC, that produce the data all other researchers use. That still doesn't disprove It's AGW that needs 'proof'. the other 89.99% Fabricated number. Not to mention science is not a popularity poll. of the world's scientists Translation: In AGW speak "scientist" is defined as those who bow to the faith. It's circular. who agree that the planet is warming at an unprecedented rate, Anyone who looks at the historical record knows that isn't true. and the 79.99% Another fabricated number. that agree it's due to man's activities. In science you need a hypothesis, falsified predictions, No question about it, that those manmade global warming fraudsters have falsified many predictions, but what science needs is *falsifiable* predictions. and experimental validation, none of which AGW has provided. And if you think otherwise then provide them. But go on, get us another TV weatherman who will stand up and tell us differently. We enjoy the humor. The typical AGW argument: No science, just ad hominem. Still Just Stupid isn't the sharpest knife in the drawer. He believes in Manmade Global warming as an Immaculate Revelation, yet brags that he drives a large, wasteful truck that makes CO2 like it's going out of fashion. Andre Jute The IPCC -- longest hand job in the history of mass hysteria -- has now lasted almost twice as long as the Third Reich |
#29
Posted to alt.guitar.amps,rec.audio.tubes,rec.bicycles.tech
|
|||
|
|||
AGW Scammer gets $541K in O'Bunny Stimulus Funds...
Chump change.
Looks like at least two (2) Nobel Peace Prizes given out for blatantly fraudulent works (of fiction): http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle6994774.ece Bill "other one also won an Oscar, of course" S. |
#30
Posted to alt.guitar.amps,rec.audio.tubes,rec.bicycles.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Global Warming Researcher gets $541K in Obama Stimulus Funds...
In article ,
* Still Just Me * wrote: You can stop with the "science isn't a popularity contest" nonsense. When 90% of the world's scientists agree that something is true based on the evidence, you'd have to be a real buffoon to go with the 10% who disagree based on their narrow political views. That 10% is sometimes referred to as biostitutes. It's an apt title, especially for the ones that get their funding and support from corporations like Chevron, British Petroleum and Shell Oil or think tanks such as Heritage, the direct descendent of the John Birch Society. They play hard, those assholes. Tony |
#31
Posted to alt.guitar.amps,rec.audio.tubes,rec.bicycles.tech
|
|||
|
|||
AGW Scammer Michael Mann gets $541K in O'Bunny Stimulus Funds...
In article ,
* Still Just Me * wrote: On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 04:54:24 -0800 (PST), Andre Jute wrote: snip Andre's usual drivel It's still none of your damn business. THEN STOP TALKING TO HIM. You are contributing to the problem by responding to Andre. -- "I wear the cheese, it does not wear me." |
#32
Posted to alt.guitar.amps,rec.audio.tubes,rec.bicycles.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Global Warming Researcher gets $541K in Obama Stimulus Funds...
flipper wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:30:32 -0800, Tony Elka wrote: In article , * Still Just Me * wrote: You can stop with the "science isn't a popularity contest" nonsense. When 90% of the world's scientists agree that something is true based on the evidence, you'd have to be a real buffoon to go with the 10% who disagree based on their narrow political views. That 10% is sometimes referred to as biostitutes. It's an apt title, especially for the ones that get their funding and support from corporations like Chevron, British Petroleum and Shell Oil or think tanks such as Heritage, the direct descendent of the John Birch Society. They play hard, those assholes. Tony Ah, the ever popular poison well fallacy from another AGW, what's science got to do, got to do, with it?, religious zealot. As I already said, it's real damn simple: provide the conjecture, the falsifiable predictions made and the results of the validation experiments because the only valid argument in science *is* 'the science' and not 'how many', regardless of their 'credentials', 'believe' this or that. And what constitutes "science" will continue to be defined by actual scientists, not cork-sniffing audiophools or tube salesmen. |
#33
Posted to alt.guitar.amps,rec.audio.tubes,rec.bicycles.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Global Warming Researcher gets $541K in Obama Stimulus Funds...
flipper wrote:
They told Einstein the same thing: dumb ass patent clerk 'disagreeing' with all those 'scientists'. And the ratio was better than a paltry, not to mention fabricated, '90%' You got a citation for that statement? Talk about fabrication... I 'fit myself in' with scientists who expect 'science' to actually be science. Then you won't mind posting your scientific credentials, right? |
#34
Posted to alt.guitar.amps,rec.audio.tubes,rec.bicycles.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Global Warming Researcher gets $541K in Obama Stimulus Funds...
flipper tapped the mic and amongst other things,
said, "Is this on?" : On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 23:09:35 -0500, "RichL" wrote: flipper wrote: They told Einstein the same thing: dumb ass patent clerk 'disagreeing' with all those 'scientists'. And the ratio was better than a paltry, not to mention fabricated, '90%' You got a citation for that statement? http://home.pacbell.net/kidwell5/aebio.html " At the time of the publication on the theory of relativity, the people that read the papers met them with skepticism and ridicule. As the other papers were published, they were viewed the same way. Since these papers were so advanced, only a few physicists even understood them, and they slowly started to realize what a true genius Einstein actually was. " Talk about fabrication... I 'fit myself in' with scientists who expect 'science' to actually be science. Then you won't mind posting your scientific credentials, right? I neither make nor respond to appeal to authority fallacies. Meanwhile, we already know Rich L, alleged Ph.D. is a re+4rd when it comes to both history and climate science. -- All the perplexities, confusion, and distress in America arise, not from defects in their Constitution or confederation, not from want of honor or virtue, so much as from downright ignorance of the nature of coin, credit, and circulation, John Adams |
#35
Posted to alt.guitar.amps,rec.audio.tubes,rec.bicycles.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Global Warming Researcher gets $541K in Obama Stimulus Funds...
In article ,
flipper wrote: On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 23:09:35 -0500, "RichL" wrote: flipper wrote: They told Einstein the same thing: dumb ass patent clerk 'disagreeing' with all those 'scientists'. And the ratio was better than a paltry, not to mention fabricated, '90%' You got a citation for that statement? http://home.pacbell.net/kidwell5/aebio.html " At the time of the publication on the theory of relativity, the people that read the papers met them with skepticism and ridicule. As the other papers were published, they were viewed the same way. Since these papers were so advanced, only a few physicists even understood them, and they slowly started to realize what a true genius Einstein actually was. " Any contemporary quotations? Annalen der Physik published five papers by Einstein in 1905, and that supports the view that his work was taken seriously. I could not find contemporary reactions to it. -- Michael Press |
#36
Posted to alt.guitar.amps,rec.audio.tubes,rec.bicycles.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Global Warming Researcher gets $541K in Obama Stimulus Funds...
flipper wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 23:06:57 -0500, "RichL" wrote: flipper wrote: On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:30:32 -0800, Tony Elka wrote: In article , * Still Just Me * wrote: You can stop with the "science isn't a popularity contest" nonsense. When 90% of the world's scientists agree that something is true based on the evidence, you'd have to be a real buffoon to go with the 10% who disagree based on their narrow political views. That 10% is sometimes referred to as biostitutes. It's an apt title, especially for the ones that get their funding and support from corporations like Chevron, British Petroleum and Shell Oil or think tanks such as Heritage, the direct descendent of the John Birch Society. They play hard, those assholes. Tony Ah, the ever popular poison well fallacy from another AGW, what's science got to do, got to do, with it?, religious zealot. As I already said, it's real damn simple: provide the conjecture, the falsifiable predictions made and the results of the validation experiments because the only valid argument in science *is* 'the science' and not 'how many', regardless of their 'credentials', 'believe' this or that. And what constitutes "science" will continue to be defined by actual scientists, not cork-sniffing audiophools or tube salesmen. Sorry, but there's already a definition of science and the scientific method. Sorry, from what I've read here over the past few years, you believe in the dumbed-down version that's taught in third grade. |
#37
Posted to alt.guitar.amps,rec.audio.tubes,rec.bicycles.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Global Warming Researcher gets $541K in Obama Stimulus Funds...
flipper wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 23:09:35 -0500, "RichL" wrote: flipper wrote: They told Einstein the same thing: dumb ass patent clerk 'disagreeing' with all those 'scientists'. And the ratio was better than a paltry, not to mention fabricated, '90%' You got a citation for that statement? http://home.pacbell.net/kidwell5/aebio.html " At the time of the publication on the theory of relativity, the people that read the papers met them with skepticism and ridicule. As the other papers were published, they were viewed the same way. Since these papers were so advanced, only a few physicists even understood them, and they slowly started to realize what a true genius Einstein actually was. " A common misconception, and one that's propagated by overly popularized renditions like the link you posted to. Third grade, like I said in a different post. Read this one: http://www.amazon.com/Einstein-Times.../dp/038001159X Also read the extensive material available from the American Physical Society's Division of History of Physics. The idea of Einstein as an iconoclast who worked in isolation and was doubted by the majority of leading physicists of the day is simply bunk. The overwhelming evidence indicates that he was well aware of relevant contemporary theoretical and experimental work of the day, and his seminal 1905 papers were published in Annalen der Physik, one of the most prestigious (and well-refereed) journals of the day and which simply didn't publish papers that were likely to be the subject of "ridicule" from respectable, first-rate physicists. Einstein did not develop relativity in isolation; rather, he built it on pioneering work of others, particularly Poincare and Lorentz theory-wise and the seminal experiments of Michelson and Morley and of Fizeau. The vast majority of the leading physicists of the day did not "ridicule" that 1905 "Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies" paper. It was not immediately *universally* accepted, which is essentially why Einstein won the Nobel prize for the photoelectric effect rather than relativity. Nevertheless, the Nobel committee is not in the business of handing out prizes in physics to people who are considered worthy of "skepticism and ridicule". Read the Clark bio. Read some reviews of it first so you'll know that I'm not simply pushing my views here. Talk about fabrication... I 'fit myself in' with scientists who expect 'science' to actually be science. Then you won't mind posting your scientific credentials, right? I neither make nor respond to appeal to authority fallacies. Translation: "I have little or no scientific training". Sorry, but physics isn't something you simply pick up overnight. You study it formally (in the vast majority of cases), or you work in a job for decades that requires you to gradually accumulate enough knowledge and experience to be proficient at it (I've seen people do that in a few cases). And once you do, you realize that the "scientific method" that we're all taught in grade school is a vast oversimplification of the reality of doing science. |
#38
Posted to alt.guitar.amps,rec.audio.tubes,rec.bicycles.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Global Warming Researcher gets $541K in Obama Stimulus Funds...
flipper wrote:
I didn't say there was a 'no publish' conspiracy against him You did imply that over 90% of scientists disagreed with him and "ridiculed" him, which is patently false. Contrary to the popular belief, Einstein's theory of relativity wasn't unanimously accepted just because of one eclipse. Here's a 1932 German article highlighting an ether drift experiment. http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/...n-ether-drift/ Hey flipper, brush up on Einstein a bit. The eclipse measurements pertained to Einstein's *general* relativity (not part of the 1905 paper), rather than *special* relativity, which the ether drift experiment pertains to. No one said it was "universally" accepted either, you said there was over 90% "disagreement", which is bunk, and posting one paper (written at a time of increasing anti-Semitism in Germany just before Hitler was named chancellor) doesn't prove a damned thing. |
#39
Posted to alt.guitar.amps,rec.audio.tubes,rec.bicycles.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Global Warming Researcher gets $541K in Obama Stimulus Funds...
RichL wrote:
flipper wrote: On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 23:09:35 -0500, "RichL" wrote: flipper wrote: They told Einstein the same thing: dumb ass patent clerk 'disagreeing' with all those 'scientists'. And the ratio was better than a paltry, not to mention fabricated, '90%' You got a citation for that statement? http://home.pacbell.net/kidwell5/aebio.html " At the time of the publication on the theory of relativity, the people that read the papers met them with skepticism and ridicule. As the other papers were published, they were viewed the same way. Since these papers were so advanced, only a few physicists even understood them, and they slowly started to realize what a true genius Einstein actually was. " A common misconception, and one that's propagated by overly popularized renditions like the link you posted to. Third grade, like I said in a different post. Read this one: http://www.amazon.com/Einstein-Times.../dp/038001159X Also read the extensive material available from the American Physical Society's Division of History of Physics. The idea of Einstein as an iconoclast who worked in isolation and was doubted by the majority of leading physicists of the day is simply bunk. It is beyond bunk. Einstein had lots of help, especially with knotty mathematical problems. The overwhelming evidence indicates that he was well aware of relevant contemporary theoretical and experimental work of the day, and his seminal 1905 papers were published in Annalen der Physik, one of the most prestigious (and well-refereed) journals of the day and which simply didn't publish papers that were likely to be the subject of "ridicule" from respectable, first-rate physicists. Einstein did not develop relativity in isolation; rather, he built it on pioneering work of others, particularly Poincare and Lorentz theory-wise and the seminal experiments of Michelson and Morley and of Fizeau. No kidding? Michelson-Morley came first? I missed that. Gads, 1887! Wow. So that hung around, and nobody really said anything on it that even began to explain it until 1905? The vast majority of the leading physicists of the day did not "ridicule" that 1905 "Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies" paper. It was not immediately *universally* accepted, which is essentially why Einstein won the Nobel prize for the photoelectric effect rather than relativity. Nevertheless, the Nobel committee is not in the business of handing out prizes in physics to people who are considered worthy of "skepticism and ridicule". Heh. Yeah. But only for physics. Read the Clark bio. Read some reviews of it first so you'll know that I'm not simply pushing my views here. +1 for the Clark bio. Talk about fabrication... I 'fit myself in' with scientists who expect 'science' to actually be science. Then you won't mind posting your scientific credentials, right? I neither make nor respond to appeal to authority fallacies. Translation: "I have little or no scientific training". Sorry, but physics isn't something you simply pick up overnight. You study it formally (in the vast majority of cases), or you work in a job for decades that requires you to gradually accumulate enough knowledge and experience to be proficient at it (I've seen people do that in a few cases). And once you do, you realize that the "scientific method" that we're all taught in grade school is a vast oversimplification of the reality of doing science. you should also explain to this guy that at the land grant sort of college I went to, you knew you were in the upper level classes when a 34 on a test was a B. The test was four pages, front and back, handwritten answers. In 50 minutes. That's when I knew I wasn't a physicist. And it wasn't a *severe* sort of physics program. I have a minor, which should be interpreted as "holy cow, don't ask this guy anything about physics!" -- Les Cargill |
#40
Posted to alt.guitar.amps,rec.audio.tubes,rec.bicycles.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Global Warming Researcher gets $541K in Obama Stimulus Funds...
Les Cargill wrote:
you should also explain to this guy that at the land grant sort of college I went to, you knew you were in the upper level classes when a 34 on a test was a B. The test was four pages, front and back, handwritten answers. In 50 minutes. I'll have nightmares tonight at the memory. But actually I did well, I sort of lived and breathed physics, the same way I lived and breathed playing music as a teenager. It became an obsession. It seems only the obsessed survive it and flourish in it. That's when I knew I wasn't a physicist. And it wasn't a *severe* sort of physics program. I have a minor, which should be interpreted as "holy cow, don't ask this guy anything about physics!" Well, you probably know more than most folks do about it, and you probably adopted a way of thinking that most folks don't experience, either. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hedge Funds support Obama: Why? | Audio Opinions | |||
SPACE MUSIC CD FUNDS TIME TRAVEL RESEARCH | Marketplace | |||
jvia it takes a scammer to defend a scammer | Marketplace |