Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
geoff geoff is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,481
Default AKG SE5E

Fixing one. Anybody have any service info for this ? I have most AKG
service stuff, but not this model ...

geoff
  #2   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Scott Dorsey Scott Dorsey is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,853
Default AKG SE5E

In article ,
Geoff wrote:
Fixing one. Anybody have any service info for this ? I have most AKG
service stuff, but not this model ...

geoff


I don't and AKG doesn't either. I believe it's a single follower with a
transformer to tap voltage off. What's it doing?
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
  #3   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
geoff geoff is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,812
Default AKG SE5E

On 29/09/2017 2:08 AM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
In article ,
Geoff wrote:
Fixing one. Anybody have any service info for this ? I have most AKG
service stuff, but not this model ...

geoff


I don't and AKG doesn't either. I believe it's a single follower with a
transformer to tap voltage off. What's it doing?
--scott



Was dull and muffled. Got grille off and touched foam filter disk which
instantly turned into powder !

But the problem seems equally in the preamp, but haven't figured out how
to remove past the battery-chamber section yet.

Getting ~12V bias voltage out to cap from from P48 in.

geoff
  #4   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Nil[_2_] Nil[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 251
Default AKG SE5E

On 29 Sep 2017, geoff wrote in
rec.audio.pro:

Was dull and muffled. Got grille off and touched foam filter disk
which instantly turned into powder !


Do you plan to replace the foam disk? I have a Shure SM58 that the same
thing happened to. The foam lining the grill ball had turned to a tarry
mess some years ago, but I recently found that the foam disk on top of
the capsule had also turned to dust. I carefully scraped it off but I'm
wondering if it's advisable to replace it.
  #5   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
geoff geoff is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,812
Default AKG SE5E

On 29/09/2017 7:54 PM, Nil wrote:
On 29 Sep 2017, geoff wrote in
rec.audio.pro:

Was dull and muffled. Got grille off and touched foam filter disk
which instantly turned into powder !


Do you plan to replace the foam disk? I have a Shure SM58 that the same
thing happened to. The foam lining the grill ball had turned to a tarry
mess some years ago, but I recently found that the foam disk on top of
the capsule had also turned to dust. I carefully scraped it off but I'm
wondering if it's advisable to replace it.


Not replacing. Has a fine metal grille and substantial slip-on foam
pop-filter if required, but probably not to be used for vox anyway.

BTW foam didn't go the sticky way, but a dry fragile web that turned
straight into dry powdery dust.

geoff


  #6   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Scott Dorsey Scott Dorsey is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,853
Default AKG SE5E

Nil wrote:
On 29 Sep 2017, geoff wrote in
rec.audio.pro:

Was dull and muffled. Got grille off and touched foam filter disk
which instantly turned into powder !


Do you plan to replace the foam disk? I have a Shure SM58 that the same
thing happened to. The foam lining the grill ball had turned to a tarry
mess some years ago, but I recently found that the foam disk on top of
the capsule had also turned to dust. I carefully scraped it off but I'm
wondering if it's advisable to replace it.


If you remove the foam from the inside of an SM58, you get a lot more top
end. In fact, if you remove the whole ball completely, it sounds like an
SM-57.

On the other hand, if you remove the foam, you get a lot more wind noise
and the mike is a lot more prone to popping.

So, if you want an SM-58, replace the foam. If you really wanted an SM-57
but all you could get was an SM-58, take the foam out.
--scott

--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
  #8   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Nil[_2_] Nil[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 251
Default AKG SE5E

On 29 Sep 2017, geoff wrote in
rec.audio.pro:

Not replacing. Has a fine metal grille and substantial slip-on
foam pop-filter if required, but probably not to be used for vox
anyway.

BTW foam didn't go the sticky way, but a dry fragile web that
turned straight into dry powdery dust.


The foam inside the grill turned to a gummy mess a long time ago. The
foam disk over the diaphragm did kind of what yours did, got dry and
crumbly. Maybe two different types of foam?
  #9   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Scott Dorsey Scott Dorsey is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,853
Default AKG SE5E

Nil wrote:
The foam from the inside of the ball turned to gum many years ago. I
scraped it out and have been using an external foam pop filter over the
outside. I recently discovered new replacement balls on Amazon for
cheap, so I did that. I just recently noticed that the foam disc on top
of the capsule had deteriorated, so I removed it. I probably won't
operate this mic without the ball filter, so I guess the diaphragm is
protected enough and I might as well leave it as is.


All of that stuff is available pretty cheaply from Shure, although their
shipping makes it expensive if you only buy one thing at a time. But as
I pointed out, if you replace all the foam completely on an SM-58, you
get a mike that sounds like a new SM-58. And that's not always what you
want.
--scott


--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
  #10   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Trevor Trevor is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,820
Default AKG SE5E

On 30/09/2017 7:16 AM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
Nil wrote:
The foam from the inside of the ball turned to gum many years ago. I
scraped it out and have been using an external foam pop filter over the
outside. I recently discovered new replacement balls on Amazon for
cheap, so I did that. I just recently noticed that the foam disc on top
of the capsule had deteriorated, so I removed it. I probably won't
operate this mic without the ball filter, so I guess the diaphragm is
protected enough and I might as well leave it as is.


All of that stuff is available pretty cheaply from Shure, although their
shipping makes it expensive if you only buy one thing at a time. But as
I pointed out, if you replace all the foam completely on an SM-58, you
get a mike that sounds like a new SM-58. And that's not always what you
want.


Of course it is, when you want to use it as a 57 you simply unscrew the
ball. Then you put it back on again for next time you want it for
vocals. Alternatively if you have 57's, slip on a foam sleeve when you
want them for vocals. You never have to worry about having the wrong one
anyway IMO. What I don't need is a 58 with a metal screen and no foam
though. Looks silly on instruments, and no good for vocals.

Trevor.

Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:15 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"