Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Note to Clyde
Don't bother. |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Note to Clyde
On 26 Noi, 11:02, George M. Middius wrote:
Don't bother. I will bother. You are in need of some help. You only posted your message three times, in three different threads. That's not enough to get the word out. to help you along, I'll post it here, just in case anybody missed your three earlier identical posts. I'll do this for a while, but in the long rune, you might want to rent a borg. George says: "To His Magnificent Dumbness, duh-Scottie of San Diego: Arnii Krooborg has proven himself the worst excuse for a self- described "christian" in the history of Usenet. Of course, we all know the filthy Beast is off his rails, as in not all there, looney-tunes, bazonkers, etc. By contrast, you appear to be sane, albeit a bit slow. I would like to ask you, as a lifelong and devout Lutheran, why you condone Bratzi's racist rants. By way of explaining your responsibility to deliver a rationalization for your approval of RAO's little Nazi bedbug, I point out that you have adopted the Krooborg's "debating trade" religion. Therefore we Smart Guys demand that you conform to the least possible level of integrity in the performance of the "debating trade". That means that you, like your hideous, misbegotten idol Arnii Kroofeces, are required to utter frequent denunciations of every opinion and every post of which you disapprove. Lacking such overt denunciations, your allegiance to the "debating trade" indicates your acceptance of such posts. You've never been shy about tattling on me or Shhhh to Mistress Jenn. Nor have you been reticent about launching volley after volley of impotent puff-ball insults at John Atkinson, whose only crime, by the 'evidence' you've cited, is drawing breath. Since you are not obviously insane, you bear the obligation to denounce racism and other bigotry, else otherwise your fealty to those antihuman values be presumed as dominant. Get on the stick, you filthy mutt! " glad to be of assistance, George. |
#3
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Note to Clyde
On Nov 26, 5:37*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On 26 Noi, 11:02, George M. Middius wrote: Don't bother. I will bother. You are in need of some help. You only posted your message three times, in three different threads. That's not enough to get the word out. to help you along, I'll post it here, just in case anybody missed your three earlier identical posts. I'll do this for a while, but in the long rune, you might want to rent a borg. George says: "To His Magnificent Dumbness, duh-Scottie of San Diego: Arnii Krooborg has proven himself the worst excuse for a self- described "christian" in the history of Usenet. Of course, we all know the filthy Beast is off his rails, as in not all there, looney-tunes, bazonkers, etc. By contrast, you appear to be sane, albeit a bit slow. I would like to ask you, as a lifelong and devout Lutheran, why you condone Bratzi's racist rants. By way of explaining your responsibility to deliver a rationalization for your approval of RAO's little Nazi bedbug, I point out that you have adopted the Krooborg's "debating trade" religion. Therefore we Smart Guys demand that you conform to the least possible level of integrity in the performance of the "debating trade". That means that you, like your hideous, misbegotten idol Arnii Kroofeces, are required to utter frequent denunciations of every opinion and every post of which you disapprove. Lacking such overt denunciations, your allegiance to the "debating trade" indicates your acceptance of such posts. You've never been shy about tattling on me or Shhhh to Mistress Jenn. Nor have you been reticent about launching volley after volley of impotent puff-ball insults at John Atkinson, whose only crime, by the 'evidence' you've cited, is drawing breath. Since you are not obviously insane, you bear the obligation to denounce racism and other bigotry, else otherwise your fealty to those antihuman values be presumed as dominant. Get on the stick, you filthy mutt! " glad to be of assistance, George. Learn how to format then. LOL! |
#4
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Note to Clyde
Wacky Sacky said: Don't bother. I will bother. You're self-bothering. You are in need of some help. How considerate of you. When it comes to your help, I'd prefer you focus on a couple of outstanding questions that you've been weaseling away from for months. First, when you were squealing in terror about SSM during your colloquy with Jenn, you pretended not to understand anything she said. I'm sure you can do better once you're out of Scottie's orbit. Second, you once claimed, in apparent seriousness, that Witless is "quite intelligent". I asked you then, and I'm asking you now, if you truly believe that, how do you explain his simpleton act on Usenet? It would be much more fruitful for you to clean up your own messes than to run interference for poor, dumb Scottie Witlessmongrel. |
#5
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Note to Clyde
On 26 Noi, 19:38, George M. Middius wrote:
Wacky Sacky said: Don't bother. I will bother. You're self-bothering. You are in need of some help. How considerate of you. When it comes to your help, I'd prefer you focus on a couple of outstanding questions that you've been weaseling away from for months. First, when you were squealing in terror about SSM during your colloquy with Jenn, you pretended not to understand anything she said. I'm sure you can do better once you're out of Scottie's orbit. That is not a question Second, you once claimed, in apparent seriousness, that Witless is "quite intelligent". I asked you then, and I'm asking you now, if you truly believe that, how do you explain his simpleton act on Usenet? that is your characterization, so you can try to explain it. It would be much more fruitful for you to clean up your own messes than to run interference for poor, dumb Scottie Witlessmongrel. My postings about your so-called question are about you and your question, not about Scott. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Note for Clyde | Audio Opinions | |||
Um, Clyde, how do you explain this? | Audio Opinions | |||
Clyde, put a muzzle on your pooch | Audio Opinions | |||
So Clyde, | Audio Opinions | |||
4 Clyde | Audio Opinions |