[Bret L]

Armies Of The Night


There are people today who would have never believed in the idea that
Mexican immigration is being power-driven on multiple levels by the
idea of reconquista and the formation of a Mexican homeland called
Aztlan. But that is changing.

by Frank Roman


"Often times, in expressing our concern about the problems that we European-Americans are facing in an increasingly multi-cultural America, we hear the room temperature litanies about our oppression of the Native Americans, black slavery, and World War II. So I guess the simple-minded logic goes something like this: because a few of our ancestors had oppressed people of other races, and now that the tables are turned, we are morally obligated to submit to our government funded, corporate sponsored, media backed oppressors. We are compelled through institutional self hate to hand over our nation and our blood to any member of a protected class who demands it because it’s the “fair” thing to do. That’s what the universities tell us. That’s what the churches tell us, too. And you know the same guilt laced judgment is used by the “race does not exist” crowd. Yes I see now: since race does not exist it’s not possible for us to be guilty of the sins of our ancestors since the distinction between races is supposedly non-existent, right? When was the last time you heard anyone point out such an obvious contradiction?

So alright then, if all European derived persons are inherently racist
and innately evil; inclined to oppress and exploit other races, why
does the Third World insist on being here whether they are invited or
not? Why do mestizos (and other approved groups) continue to enjoy the
fruits of a European America by demanding ever more subservience and
financial charity from the host population? At the risk of sounding
facetious-- why is the desire for racial separation as expressed by
Caucasian activists equated by some groups with gas chambers lynching
and genocide? Well, you’ll have to go to the source to find the
answer (here).

There are people today who would have never believed in the idea that
Mexican immigration is being power-driven on multiple levels by the
idea of reconquista and the formation of a Mexican homeland called
Aztlan. But that is changing, people do understand now that dominating
the southwestern US by way of immigration, rooted in leftist dogmatic
revulsion against the United States and her founding race of people,
for the sake of a Mexican empire called Aztlan is indeed a reality.
Whether or not the intruders from the southern hemisphere come
individually, in family units or, more often than not, as a convoy of
idealized young males it is an invasion no matter how you look at it.
People are beginning to see it for what it is as the armies of the
night come by the thousands, and those enlightened numbers absolutely
must increase if not convert into tough action.

We can call them whatever we want: illegal aliens, undocumented
persons, displaced nationals, Mexicans, mestizos, whatever. The
marchers tell themselves in one way or another and for various reasons
they do not need permission to enter the United States. (Try pulling
that same stunt in Mexico and see what happens) Unfortunately, our
nation is lousy with ‘human rights’ enablers in the federal government
and the media who agree with such foolishness. Clearly the Treaty of
Guadalupe Hidalgo and the Gadsden Purchase which followed the Mexican
American War (1) which settled once and for all the location of the US
Mexican border is not good enough for our people’s domestic and
foreign enemies. Cloaked in the deceiving language of “bettering
themselves,” which is just another way of saying they deserve to
recover the “lost lands” of their ancestors the mestizos and their
mouth organs here in the US are making major progress in recovering
the land in question.

This then begs a question: what are you going to do about it?

Of course, the loudmouths and the pundits, the equality whores and the
human rights hypocrites wouldn’t dream of living on or near the US
Mexican border, now would they? They prefer their suburban hinterlands
and air conditioned offices (with unlimited media access and self
important titles) from which to dictate how the rest of us should feel
and act as the founding stock of our nation is dispossessed (2).
Thankfully however, there has been a fair amount of progress to curb
this insanity and we should thank all of those who are involved with
this work and pitch in to help them--now. But the big shots’ half
hearted stupid attempts to enforce the border are ongoing, in spite of
the fact that community supports once meant for the most vulnerable of
our people are collapsing every day; in spite of the fact the Aztlan
desert crossers (and their insolent enablers) prefer not to “become
Americans” as the pretzel spine republicrats say they should.

And speaking of pretzel spine Republicrats, I just saw some footage of
Sen. Lindsey Graham(R) sitting and chatting with controversial Judge
Sonia Sotomayor. In case you don’t know her Supreme Court selection
hearings are under way this coming week. In recent weeks, however,
Lindsey Graham has been especially hard on Ms. Sotomayor, promising
that she will have a tough time getting a seat on the highest court in
the land if he has anything to say about it. Unfortunately, many dupes
out there in TV land don’t know that this weasel Graham has spoken at
LaRaza’s annual conference. That's right La Raza, condemning unto
death before a non-white audience the efforts of a handful of white
Americans trying to stem the flow of Third World peasants into our
nation (3). Such is the power of the media.

Increasingly ghettoized as a rump backwater minority by the Aztlan
enablers, it was European Americans who founded the United States as a
country living under English Common Law, the Magna Carta, the Articles
of Confederation, Declaration of Independence, the US Constitution and
the concept of individual sovereignty (framed in a monoracial nation)
working for the sake of its people’s posterity. These concepts and
instruments will simply die as Mexicans (and other non-whites)
continue to gain demographic and political dominance. Except for mealy-
mouthed platitudes, Mexicans have already demonstrated they are not
interested in preserving these things. Aztlan will certainly codify
their rejection, and woe unto anyone other than a mestizo still
residing in their territory because the perks they all now currently
enjoy will cease to exist. No Mexican, no Haitian, no Muslim, no Asian
will ever be able to fully duplicate our people’s way of life, as
imperfect as it may be, or replace it under a different name. The only
thing they will replicate is the corruption, poverty, backwardness,
and the violence of their hereditary homelands. Los Angeles offers the
perfect model.

We should all clearly understand why continental separation from the
Third World should have been kept in place; like it was before the
insanity set in following World War Two. So it’s critical to recognize
in the simplest of terms: 1] were it not for the greedy corporations
seeking cheap labor petitioning the federal government, 2] were it not
for the unions requiring dues paying members, 3] were it not for the
churches who need tithe paying constituents; and 4] were it not for
the social engineers --who hate the West and by extension hate YOU--
needing victims to beat us over the head with, we could fix this race
problem, we could fix this nationhood problem in a relatively short
period of time. But we won’t have that luxury unless you join us now
for a permanent long term solution."



1] Mariano Paredes, who was the mestizo dictator prior to the Mexican
American War very much wanted to fight the United States because he
thought he was going to get Texas back; and not just Texas. He was
going to occupy Louisiana, Mississippi. Mexico was impatient to fight
that war.

2] "acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a
national, ethnical, racial or religious group, … deliberately
inflicting on the group conditions of life, calculated to bring about
its physical destruction in whole or in part.”(UN definition of
Genocide)

3]We have to consult Black’s Law Dictionary (Sixth Edition, 1990) for
the traditional and accurate definition: “Nation - A people, or
aggregation of men, existing in the form of an organized … society,
usually inhabiting a (distinct) portion of the earth, speaking the
same language, using the same customs, possessing historic continuity,
and distinguished from other like groups by their racial origin and
characteristics, and generally, but not necessarily, living under the
same government and sovereignty.” That is the definition of a nation.


http://www.wvwnews.net/story.php?id=7486