Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#281
|
|||
|
|||
Hafler (the first MOSFET? I don't think so)
Arny said
My hearing is deficient because I can hear the noise and distortion that apparently escapes yours, sockpuppet? I said I don't know why your hearing is deficient Arny. Maybe it is years of banging your head against hard objects. Your inability to appreciate the virtues of vinyl and tubes is the proof. Your inability to understand that fact speaks to your stupidity. Arny said But just a second, my problems with vinylism and tubism are due to the excess noise and distortion that I hear, and you don't hear. We are obviously listening to different amps and turntables. I don't doubt that your equipment gives you a problem with noise and distortion. I'm sure I would have no trouble hearing it with your equipment. I am quite sure that you would not be able to identify such artifacts from my system by ear in a blind test with a clean record. Arny said Since when is the ability to hear something that is (a) known to be present and even present by design Prove you can hear it in every design. Arny said (b) not heard by others proof of a hearing disorder? Prove you can hear anything I cannot.Put up or shut up. Lets take hearing tests and compare the results. Of course this is a straw man argument on your part. The virtues of tubes and vinyl when it is done well more than compensate for their small shortcomings. No one is claiming that the noise from tubes and vinyl are always inadible. The claim is that on a true highend system they are barely noticable and a very wirhtwhile trade off for the denefits they offer. I said I guess you are under the delusional impression that I am the first person to suggest you are suffering from substantial hearing loss. Arny said Not at all. Thanks for admitting your rant about me using the word "we" was also bull****. If you knew I wasn't the first to suggest you have hearing problems then it should have been obvious who was meant by "we." I said Your reluctance to take a hearing test only supports the assertion. Arny said Tell us about all the hearing tests you've taken, sockpuppet. Post their results for all to see! I will happily do so if you agree to do so as well. Chicken? Arny said Of course, then sockpuppet your have to show that hearing tests are the most important measure of how well a person hears differences between different kinds of audio gear. No I don't. Hearing loss is hearing loss. Arny said Hint: they aren't. Hint. You are an idiot if you believe hearing acuity doesn't affect how well a person hears differnces between audio equipment. It looks like you are already trying to rationalize results that you expect to be pretty bad. You always show your hand. No wonder you have no intention of ever showing the results of a hearing test. Arny said The true measure of how well a person hears differences between different kinds of audio gear is how well a person actually and reliably hears differences between different kinds of audio gear that are known to sound different, or how well people hear differences between sonic differences that are similar to those that are known to exist between different kinds of audio gear. This coming from one the preachers of everything sounds the same or it's broken. LOL Thanks for proving you are suffering from severs hearing problems by your own standards of proof. Arny said Fact is sockpuppet, you flunked the biggest hearing test of all - the one where you failed to hear the spurious noises and distortions inherent in your worship of vinylism and tubism. See above. Arny said I suspect this disability is magnified by the fact that you live next to a busy highway in a cheaply-built lightweight California mass-produced cookie-cutter house. I suppose this current plate of sour grapes over a well built house with custom additions in a nice quiet neighborhood is the result of class envy. You cannot afford my house so you have to make up lies about it. What is your house worth Arny? Oh yeah, you are too ashamed to say what it is worth. |
#282
|
|||
|
|||
Hafler (the first MOSFET? I don't think so)
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:18:18 -0500, "Sockpuppet Yustabe"
wrote: "Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message ... On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:16:00 -0500, "Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote: "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message This argument is about the ridiculous concept btought forth, that tube guitar amps and tube audio amps are, and sound, the same. That would be a straw man that you created, Yustabe. no, way back when, it was offered that they were the same. Nope, it was offered that the distortion *mechanisms* are the same. They are. Just like various cars have the same propulsion 'mechanisms', yet they are different from each other, have different performances, and have different 'feels'. As ever, you lose the argument and start to duck and dive............. -- Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering |
#283
|
|||
|
|||
Hafler (the first MOSFET? I don't think so)
"S888Wheel" wrote in message
Arny said My hearing is deficient because I can hear the noise and distortion that apparently escapes yours, sockpuppet? I said I don't know why your hearing is deficient Arny. Maybe it is years of banging your head against hard objects. Your inability to appreciate the virtues of vinyl and tubes is the proof. Your inability to understand that fact speaks to your stupidity. Arny said But just a second, my problems with vinylism and tubism are due to the excess noise and distortion that I hear, and you don't hear. We are obviously listening to different amps and turntables. Obviouisly they are different - yours are in California and mine are in Michigan. I don't doubt that your equipment gives you a problem with noise and distortion. I've run into a number of people in Michigan that share your hearing disability, sockpuppet. They have vinyl playback systems and profess that they have some desirable quality that outweighs the racket of pops, tics, rumble, and possibly even acoustic feedback. They can't hear it but many of the rest of us can. I'm sure I would have no trouble hearing it with your equipment. Most of the noise in vinyl comes from the recordings. I guess you're claiming that *all* of the LPs in Michigan are afflicted with audible noise, while *all* of the LPs in California aren't. Tough sell, that one. I am quite sure that you would not be able to identify such artifacts from my system by ear in a blind test with a clean record. I'm sure you're as deaf as a door nail, sockpuppet. Why don't you tell us how you do with the listening tests that you can freely download from http://www.pcabx.com/training/index.htm . Of course I don't expect that you could master the complexities of the ABX system despite the fact that thousands of others have done so quite easily. Arny said Since when is the ability to hear something that is (a) known to be present and even present by design Prove you can hear it in every design. Never said such a thing. Why do I bother with illiterates like you, sockpuppet? Arny said (b) not heard by others proof of a hearing disorder? Prove you can hear anything I cannot.Put up or shut up. Lets take hearing tests and compare the results. Asked and answered. Tell us about your DBT results with the hearing tests at http://www.pcabx.com/training/index.htm . Of course this is a straw man argument on your part. The virtues of tubes and vinyl when it is done well more than compensate for their small shortcomings. That's like saying that blackouts cirrhosis of the liver and DTs are detriments that are far less than the good warm buzz that moderate consumption of alcohol gives non-addicts. No one is claiming that the noise from tubes and vinyl are always inadible. The noise inherent in good digital and good solid state equipment IS inaudible. Why go backwards when you can go forewards so easily? The claim is that on a true highend system they are barely noticable and a very wirhtwhile trade off for the denefits they offer. That's like saying that blackouts cirrhosis of the liver and DTs are detriments that are far less than the good warm buzz that moderate consumption of alcohol gives non-addicts. I said I guess you are under the delusional impression that I am the first person to suggest you are suffering from substantial hearing loss. Arny said Not at all. Thanks for admitting your rant about me using the word "we" was also bull****. Never said such a thing. Why do I bother with functional illiterates like you, sockpuppet? I said Your reluctance to take a hearing test only supports the assertion. Arny said Tell us about all the hearing tests you've taken, sockpuppet. Post their results for all to see! I will happily do so if you agree to do so as well. Chicken? Asked and answered. Arny said Of course, then sockpuppet you have to show that hearing tests are the most important measure of how well a person hears differences between different kinds of audio gear. No I don't. You're not the God of Science, sockpuppet. Hearing loss is hearing loss. It's well known among people who study such things that certain kinds of hearing loss even improve the listener's ability to hear certain kinds of differences due to technical deficiencies. Arny said Hint: they aren't. Hint. You are an idiot if you believe hearing acuity doesn't affect how well a person hears differnces between audio equipment. Sometimes it does, sometimes it doesn't. Since you are so young and immature sockpuppet you are obviously unaware about the benefits of age and experience over youth and physical strength. It looks like you are already trying to rationalize results that you expect to be pretty bad. Never said such a thing. Why do I bother with illiterates like you, sockpuppet? You always show your hand. Never said such a thing. Why do I bother with illiterates like you, sockpuppet? No wonder you have no intention of ever showing the results of a hearing test. Never said such a thing. Why do I bother with illiterates like you, sockpuppet? Arny said The true measure of how well a person hears differences between different kinds of audio gear is how well a person actually and reliably hears differences between different kinds of audio gear that are known to sound different, or how well people hear differences between sonic differences that are similar to those that are known to exist between different kinds of audio gear. This coming from one the preachers of everything sounds the same or it's broken. Never said such a thing. Why do I bother with illiterates like you, sockpuppet? Thanks for proving you are suffering from severs hearing problems by your own standards of proof. Never said such a thing. Why do I bother with delusionals like you, sockpuppet? Arny said Fact is sockpuppet, you flunked the biggest hearing test of all - the one where you failed to hear the spurious noises and distortions inherent in your worship of vinylism and tubism. See above. You were talking trash, sockpuppet. Arny said I suspect this disability is magnified by the fact that you live next to a busy highway in a cheaply-built lightweight California mass-produced cookie-cutter house. I suppose this current plate of sour grapes over a well built house with custom additions in a nice quiet neighborhood is the result of class envy. A lightweight house backed up on Victory Avenue in the valley is a "nice quiet neighborhood". LOL! I think I've even zoomed down that road a few times in my life. What's this class envy thing? Why would a member of a higher educational, social and economic class such as I, envy a member of a lower class such as you? Frankly, my attitudes are pretty class-struggle free. I judge people by what they are as individuals, how they think and act. Their possessions are their posessions and not vice-versa. You have to be really shallow to judge people by their material goods, and that's exactly what you are up to here, sockpuppet. You cannot afford my house so you have to make up lies about it. Since I live in a house that with its failings is still stucturally superior, and that is not immediately adjacent to a major thoroughfare, I have to presume that you're mumbling delusionally again, sockpuppet. I think that Vicotry Blvd versus Mack avenue typifies the differences. Victory Blvd by where you live has a narrow paved median and lots of traffic, while Mack Avenue where I live has only local traffic, and a broad, park-like median with grass, trees, bushes and old-style lighting and road signs. What is your house worth Arny? Sockpuppet, why don't you check the listing services like Weil did to see what houses in my immediate neighborhood sell for. Ooops I forgot, you don't know how to do research on the web. Oh yeah, you are too ashamed to say what it is worth. I really don't know. I have no intent of selling it in the near future. Why don't you tell us what your house is worth sockpuppet. You probably are dying to sell the noisy POS. |
#284
|
|||
|
|||
Hafler (the first MOSFET? I don't think so)
Arny said
My hearing is deficient because I can hear the noise and distortion that apparently escapes yours, sockpuppet? I said I don't know why your hearing is deficient Arny. Maybe it is years of banging your head against hard objects. Your inability to appreciate the virtues of vinyl and tubes is the proof. Your inability to understand that fact speaks to your stupidity. Arny said But just a second, my problems with vinylism and tubism are due to the excess noise and distortion that I hear, and you don't hear. I said We are obviously listening to different amps and turntables. Arny said Obviouisly they are different - yours are in California and mine are in Michigan. And mine are vastly superior to yours regardless of what location they are in. You didn't get the point. As usual. I said I don't doubt that your equipment gives you a problem with noise and distortion. Arny said I've run into a number of people in Michigan that share your hearing disability, sockpuppet. Prove I have a hearing disability Arny. Lets both get our hearing checked and compare results. Oh yeah, you have already tried to rationalize your measurable hearing deficiencies. Arny said They have vinyl playback systems and profess that they have some desirable quality that outweighs the racket of pops, tics, rumble, and possibly even acoustic feedback. They can't hear it but many of the rest of us can. Prove you can hear acoustic feedback on my table as it is set up Arny. I said I'm sure I would have no trouble hearing it with your equipment. Arny said Most of the noise in vinyl comes from the recordings. If the noise is on the recordings and vinyl reveals it but CDs do not then vinyl is simply more revealing of the source. That would make it higher in fidelity by your standards of fidelity. Look before you leap dip****. If you claim this is not the case then saying most of the noise is on the recordings is a straw man since it is irrelevant to the merits of the two media. Duh! Arny said I guess you're claiming that *all* of the LPs in Michigan are afflicted with audible noise, while *all* of the LPs in California aren't. Of course someone with such pour powers of deduction would draw such an irrational conclusion. I was claiming that "your equipment" is the major problem and not all equipment is so severely afflicted with such problems as yours clearly is. What part of "your equipment" did you not understand? Are you so stupid you thought I meant all the LPs in Michigan when I said "your equipment?" Arny said I am quite sure that you would not be able to identify such artifacts from my system by ear in a blind test with a clean record. Arny said I'm sure you're as deaf as a door nail, sockpuppet. So says the guy affraid to take a hearing test and compare the results to mine. Arny said Arny said Since when is the ability to hear something that is (a) known to be present and even present by design I said Prove you can hear it in every design. Arny said (b) not heard by others proof of a hearing disorder? I said Prove you can hear anything I cannot.Put up or shut up. Lets take hearing tests and compare the results. Arny said Asked and answered Yeah your answer was no. You are afraid of the truth being public about your hearing. Thanks for the admission. Arny said That's like saying that blackouts cirrhosis of the liver and DTs are detriments that are far less than the good warm buzz that moderate consumption of alcohol gives non-addicts. Talk about illiteracy. LOL I said No one is claiming that the noise from tubes and vinyl are always inadible. Arny said The noise inherent in good digital and good solid state equipment IS inaudible. Why go backwards when you can go forewards so easily? I guess the only element of the sound of playback is noise. That's a true sign of a music lover. Not. I said The claim is that on a true highend system they are barely noticable and a very wirhtwhile trade off for the benefits they offer. Arny said That's like saying that blackouts cirrhosis of the liver and DTs are detriments that are far less than the good warm buzz that moderate consumption of alcohol gives non-addicts. That is fairly ridiculous. You need to work on your powers of analogy. I said I guess you are under the delusional impression that I am the first person to suggest you are suffering from substantial hearing loss. Arny said Not at all. I said Thanks for admitting your rant about me using the word "we" was also bull****. Arny said Never said such a thing. The admission was clearly implied. Arny said Why do I bother with functional illiterates like you, sockpuppet? Don't blame me if you can't figurew out what your own words imply. Literacy has nothing to do with it dip****. |
#285
|
|||
|
|||
Hafler (the first MOSFET? I don't think so)
I said Your reluctance to take a hearing test only supports the assertion. Arny said Tell us about all the hearing tests you've taken, sockpuppet. Post their results for all to see! I said I will happily do so if you agree to do so as well. Chicken? Arny said Asked and answered. Yeah your answer was no. The reasons are obvious. You don't want objective proof of your hearing deficiencies published on RAO. Arny said Of course, then sockpuppet you have to show that hearing tests are the most important measure of how well a person hears differences between different kinds of audio gear. I said No I don't. Arny said You're not the God of Science, sockpuppet. Arny can't help himself here. He likes to try to disguise his own religion in a cloak of science. Just as any creationist would do. Hearing loss is hearing loss. Arny said It's well known among people who study such things that certain kinds of hearing loss even improve the listener's ability to hear certain kinds of differences due to technical deficiencies. Take a hearing test so we can see if this is the case with you. We all know you won't take such a test for obvious reasons. Arny said Hint: they aren't. I said Hint. You are an idiot if you believe hearing acuity doesn't affect how well a person hears differnces between audio equipment. Arny said Sometimes it does, sometimes it doesn't. Since you are so young and immature sockpuppet you are obviously unaware about the benefits of age and experience over youth and physical strength. LOL you show your hand again. You are making more excuses for your poor hearing. A fact you don't want to be proven objectively and published on RAO. I said It looks like you are already trying to rationalize results that you expect to be pretty bad. Arny said Never said such a thing. Why do I bother with illiterates like you, sockpuppet? Talk about illiteracy. Where did I say you "said" anything? I said you were trying to "rationalize" results that you "expect" to be pretty bad. You apparently don't know what these simple words mean if you interpret them as a claim that you "said" anything. I said You always show your hand. Arny said Never said such a thing. Why do I bother with illiterates like you, sockpuppet? Look in the mirror dip****. How illiterate does one have to be to think my claim implies you "said any such thing?" I said No wonder you have no intention of ever showing the results of a hearing test. Arny said Never said such a thing. Why do I bother with illiterates like you, sockpuppet? It is amazing how one can make such an issue of literacy while obviously misinterpreting simple sentences. Again no claim that you said anything in particular was made. Learn to read with some basic comprehension. Arny said The true measure of how well a person hears differences between different kinds of audio gear is how well a person actually and reliably hears differences between different kinds of audio gear that are known to sound different, or how well people hear differences between sonic differences that are similar to those that are known to exist between different kinds of audio gear. I said This coming from one the preachers of everything sounds the same or it's broken. Arny said Never said such a thing. Why do I bother with illiterates like you, sockpuppet? Straight from the department of redundancy department. I said Thanks for proving you are suffering from severs hearing problems by your own standards of proof. Arny said Never said such a thing. Why do I bother with delusionals like you, sockpuppet? Code for "I have lost and have no answer to your arguments." Lets review the bulk of Arny's comments on this post. Never said such a thing. Why do I bother with delusionals like you, sockpuppet? Never said such a thing. Why do I bother with delusionals like you, sockpuppet? Never said such a thing. Why do I bother with delusionals like you, sockpuppet? Never said such a thing. Why do I bother with delusionals like you, sockpuppet? Never said such a thing. Why do I bother with delusionals like you, sockpuppet? Is this what is commonly known as an RAO meltdown? Arny said I suspect this disability is magnified by the fact that you live next to a busy highway in a cheaply-built lightweight California mass-produced cookie-cutter house. I said I suppose this current plate of sour grapes over a well built house with custom additions in a nice quiet neighborhood is the result of class envy. Arny said A lightweight house backed up on Victory Avenue in the valley is a "nice quiet neighborhood" Lightwieght? Thanks for showing your ignorance on thenature of houses in Southern California. I don't live on Victory Ave. The noise from Victory is barely audible from the rest of my house. In my custom built listening room it is virtually inaudible unless there is a car accident or a siren. There is no way it can be heard when music is playing. I see you don't want to talk about house values though. Figures. Sour Grapes as usual. Arny said LOL! I think I've even zoomed down that road a few times in my life. But you have obviously never driven down the street I live on. Please don't. It is creepy enough that you are researching my place of residence. I guess you have done enough research to realize you don't want to talk about house values. LOL. Arny said What's this class envy thing? It's been explained to you Arny numerous times. Playing dumb won't make it go away. Of course you are so stupid that you may nor be playing at all. Arny said Why would a member of a higher educational, social and economic class such as I, LOL. Tell us the value of your home. Tell us your anual income. Tell us about your social status? Arny said You have to be really shallow to judge people by their material goods, Then stop serving up sour grapes and live with the fact that you simply cannot afford my equipment. Jeez! I said You cannot afford my house so you have to make up lies about it. Arny said Since I live in a house that with its failings is still stucturally superior, Guess you don't understand the point of construction suited for the region. Your house would hardly be structurally superior if it were in my neighborhood. It would be unsellable and would have to be leveled and rebuilt to code. Arny said and that is not immediately adjacent to a major thoroughfare, Actually yours is. Mine is quite unaffected by traffic noise. More sour grapes. Figures. What is your house worth? You won't say will you? I think that Vicotry Blvd versus Mack avenue typifies the differences. Victory Blvd by where you live has a narrow paved median and lots of traffic, You are obviously delusional if you think this makes the ambient sound from traffic any less in your house than in mine. I said What is your house worth Arny? Arny said Sockpuppet, why don't you check the listing services like Weil did to see what houses in my immediate neighborhood sell for. Ooops I forgot, you don't know how to do research on the web. LOL you don't want to answer the question. Figures. Sour Grapes all over again. I said Oh yeah, you are too ashamed to say what it is worth. Arny said I really don't know Yeah right. Arny said I have no intent of selling it in the near future. I don't blame you. Not much chance of moving up with your income, or lack of it. Arny said Why don't you tell us what your house is worth sockpuppet. You probably are dying to sell the noisy POS. $480,000.00 and rising. I do expect to move up to an even better house some time in the next few years. I can afford to. It isn't easy to find a house that has a better listening room than the one I have in this school district though. I had to custom build this one. Now tell us what your house is worth Arny. LOL. |
#286
|
|||
|
|||
Hafler (the first MOSFET? I don't think so)
"S888Wheel" wrote in message
Sockpuppet, why don't you check the listing services like Weil did to see what houses in my immediate neighborhood sell for. Ooops I forgot, you don't know how to do research on the web. LOL you don't want to answer the question. Figures. Sour Grapes all over again. Here's the MLS number of the house across the street which is for sale: 30175404 Type it in he http://www.realestateone.com/indexII.cfm Then consider that my house is just plain larger - significantly more square feet, bigger lot, 2 full baths, 5 bedrooms, etc. Then consider the fact that the price multiplier for the prices of houses in the LA area versus houses in suburban Detroit is about 3. Enjoy! |
#287
|
|||
|
|||
Hafler (the first MOSFET? I don't think so)
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message "Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message ... On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:16:00 -0500, "Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote: "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message This argument is about the ridiculous concept btought forth, that tube guitar amps and tube audio amps are, and sound, the same. That would be a straw man that you created, Yustabe. no, way back when, it was offered that they were the same. Nope, it was offered that the distortion *mechanisms* are the same. They are. Just like various cars have the same propulsion 'mechanisms', yet they are different from each other, have different performances, and have different 'feels'. Yes, but I'm sure we could all characterize the general differences between cars with conventional steam engines (metaphor for vinylism and tubism) and high performance modern engines (metaphor for good solid state and digital). That is consisitent with your known and proven minimal abilities of discernment. ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#288
|
|||
|
|||
Hafler (the first MOSFET? I don't think so)
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "S888Wheel" wrote in message My hearing is deficient because I can hear the noise and distortion that apparently escapes yours, sockpuppet? I don't know why your hearing is deficient Arny. Maybe it is years of banging your head against hard objects. Your inability to appreciate the virtues of vinyl and tubes is the proof. Your inability to understand that fact speaks to your stupidity. But just a second, my problems with vinylism and tubism are due to the excess noise and distortion that I hear, and you don't hear. Since when is the ability to hear something that is (a) known to be present and even present by design (b) not heard by others proof of a hearing disorder? I said I guess you are under the delusional impression that I am the first person to suggest you are suffering from substantial hearing loss. Not at all. Your reluctance to take a hearing test only supports the assertion. Tell us about all the hearing tests you've taken, sockpuppet. Post their results for all to see! Of course, then sockpuppet your have to show that hearing tests are the most important measure of how well a person hears differences between different kinds of audio gear. Hint: they aren't. The true measure of how well a person hears differences between different kinds of audio gear is how well a person actually and reliably hears differences between different kinds of audio gear that are known to sound different, or how well people hear differences between sonic differences that are similar to those that are known to exist between different kinds of audio gear. Ironically, my www.pcabx.com web site is a good example of such a testing facility. Fact is sockpuppet, you flunked the biggest hearing test of all - the one where you failed to hear the spurious noises and distortions inherent in your worship of vinylism and tubism. I suspect this disability is magnified by the fact that you live next to a busy highway in a cheaply-built lightweight California mass-produced cookie-cutter house. So does Phillips. Both of you worship tubism and vinylism. Is there a connection? High ambient noise is a well-known detriment to hearing differences between audio gear. That is where you (purposefully) misunderstand us Arny. Not at all. Yes, we do hear the noises and sometimes, the distortions, but these detriments are far less than the attributes of superior musical qualities that we enjoy from listening to vinyl. That's like saying that blackouts cirrhosis of the liver and DTs are detriments that are far less than the good warm buzz that moderate consumption of alcohol gives non-addicts. Another self admitted indication that you are more attuned to noise than to good music. ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#289
|
|||
|
|||
Hafler (the first MOSFET? I don't think so)
"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message ... On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:18:18 -0500, "Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote: "Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message ... On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:16:00 -0500, "Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote: "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message This argument is about the ridiculous concept btought forth, that tube guitar amps and tube audio amps are, and sound, the same. That would be a straw man that you created, Yustabe. no, way back when, it was offered that they were the same. Nope, it was offered that the distortion *mechanisms* are the same. They are. Just like various cars have the same propulsion 'mechanisms', yet they are different from each other, have different performances, and have different 'feels'. As ever, you lose the argument and start to duck and dive............. -- Whilst you croon "If the River was whiskey and I was a divin' duck, I'd dive to the bottom and never get up." (Sleepy John Estes) ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#290
|
|||
|
|||
Hafler (the first MOSFET? I don't think so)
"S888Wheel" wrote in message ... $480,000.00 and rising. I do expect to move up to an even better house some time in the next few years. I can afford to. It isn't easy to find a house that has a better listening room than the one I have in this school district though. I had to custom build this one. Now tell us what your house is worth Arny. LOL. It is assessed at $130,650.00!!!!!!! 1600 Prestwick Road Grosse Pointe Woods, Michigan Parcel 015 01 0175 000 $130,650 is the full assessed value. The taxable value is $81,690 2,498 square feet Built in 1932 ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#291
|
|||
|
|||
Hafler (the first MOSFET? I don't think so)
Here's the MLS number of the house across the street which is for sale: 30175404 Type it in he http://www.realestateone.com/indexII.cfm Listed at 289,000.00 It looks as if it is in excellent repair. Then consider that my house is just plain larger - significantly more square feet, bigger lot, 2 full baths, 5 bedrooms, etc. And what else? Older? In disrepair? There is no real reason to assume your house would sell for more if the house you cited can actually fetch the asking price. It is not uncommon for sellers to come down in their asking price. So far i see no reason to believe your house is worth more than 300,000.00 which puts it at a significantly lower value than mine. Arny said Then consider the fact that the price multiplier for the prices of houses in the LA area versus houses in suburban Detroit is about 3. Maybe yo should simply consider the reality that prices are higher here because more people want to live here. It is simple economics of supply and demand. It is easy to buy large homes with lots of land for less money in places where few people want to live. Arny said Enjoy! LOL. I did. |
#292
|
|||
|
|||
Hafler (the first MOSFET? I don't think so)
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "S888Wheel" wrote in message Sockpuppet, why don't you check the listing services like Weil did to see what houses in my immediate neighborhood sell for. Ooops I forgot, you don't know how to do research on the web. LOL you don't want to answer the question. Figures. Sour Grapes all over again. Here's the MLS number of the house across the street which is for sale: 30175404 Type it in he http://www.realestateone.com/indexII.cfm Then consider that my house is just plain larger - significantly more square feet, bigger lot, 2 full baths, 5 bedrooms, etc. Then consider the fact that the price multiplier for the prices of houses in the LA area versus houses in suburban Detroit is about 3. Enjoy! Although assessed at $130,650, I would say the it would sell for about $260000 I checked recent sales on his street, vs, assessments, and found that assessments are about 50% of the recent sales prices. 1589 Prestwick sold for $250,000 in 2000. The 2002 assessment on that one was $124,700 But I would not agree that the multiplier for LA is 3. ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#293
|
|||
|
|||
Hafler (the first MOSFET? I don't think so)
"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "S888Wheel" wrote in message Sockpuppet, why don't you check the listing services like Weil did to see what houses in my immediate neighborhood sell for. Ooops I forgot, you don't know how to do research on the web. LOL you don't want to answer the question. Figures. Sour Grapes all over again. Here's the MLS number of the house across the street which is for sale: 30175404 Type it in he http://www.realestateone.com/indexII.cfm Then consider that my house is just plain larger - significantly more square feet, bigger lot, 2 full baths, 5 bedrooms, etc. Then consider the fact that the price multiplier for the prices of houses in the LA area versus houses in suburban Detroit is about 3. Enjoy! Although assessed at $130,650, I would say the it would sell for about $260,000. Ignorance is bliss and Yustabe is more ignorant than most... More details about Yustabe's ignorance below. I checked recent sales on his street, vs, assessments, and found that assessments are about 50% of the recent sales prices. There's a hidden agenda item about property assessments in Michigan that you're not taking into consideration, Yustabe. Note, it makes a big difference in this specific comparison. Hint: I probably owned this house when sockpuppet wheel graduated from college. 1589 Prestwick sold for $250,000 in 2000. The 2002 assessment on that one was $124,700 Now that's interesting, because there was not a change of occupant, but there was a death in the family. I mentioned the offering price of that house to my daughter, and she agreed that it is ahem, priced to sell. Another house across the street sold for about 10% more about a year ago, and the two houses are very comparable. The rule of thumb in Michigan is that assessed valuations are exactly 1/2 of estimated sales price, except for that hidden agenda item I alluded to that significantly depresses the assessed value of my house. But I would not agree that the multiplier for LA is 3. As usual, it depends on exactly what you're comparing, but in the specific context... Not a bad job of data stalking, Yustabe! too bad you're so ignorant of all the relevant facts. |
#294
|
|||
|
|||
Hafler (the first MOSFET? I don't think so)
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "S888Wheel" wrote in message Sockpuppet, why don't you check the listing services like Weil did to see what houses in my immediate neighborhood sell for. Ooops I forgot, you don't know how to do research on the web. LOL you don't want to answer the question. Figures. Sour Grapes all over again. Here's the MLS number of the house across the street which is for sale: 30175404 Type it in he http://www.realestateone.com/indexII.cfm Then consider that my house is just plain larger - significantly more square feet, bigger lot, 2 full baths, 5 bedrooms, etc. Then consider the fact that the price multiplier for the prices of houses in the LA area versus houses in suburban Detroit is about 3. Enjoy! Although assessed at $130,650, I would say the it would sell for about $260,000. Ignorance is bliss and Yustabe is more ignorant than most... More details about Yustabe's ignorance below. I checked recent sales on his street, vs, assessments, and found that assessments are about 50% of the recent sales prices. There's a hidden agenda item about property assessments in Michigan that you're not taking into consideration, Yustabe. Note, it makes a big difference in this specific comparison. Hint: I probably owned this house when sockpuppet wheel graduated from college. 1589 Prestwick sold for $250,000 in 2000. The 2002 assessment on that one was $124,700 Now that's interesting, because there was not a change of occupant, but there was a death in the family. I mentioned the offering price of that house to my daughter, and she agreed that it is ahem, priced to sell. Another house across the street sold for about 10% more about a year ago, and the two houses are very comparable. The rule of thumb in Michigan is that assessed valuations are exactly 1/2 of estimated sales price, except for that hidden agenda item I alluded to that significantly depresses the assessed value of my house. But I would not agree that the multiplier for LA is 3. As usual, it depends on exactly what you're comparing, but in the specific context... Not a bad job of data stalking, Yustabe! too bad you're so ignorant of all the relevant facts. Of course, not being based in Michigan, I don't have all the facts. But I did report those that I had found. I did notice that there are two assesment amounts for each property, one that is based upon valuation, and one that is used for applying the tax rate. In some cases they are identical, in other cases thay are close to each other, and some cases there is a great variation. That might be what Arny is referring to, that there might be a break for long time homeowners. At any rate, I used the 'valuaton' assessment in my comparisons, rather than the variable assessment. So (still not knowing the absolute facts) I suspect the agenda ARny talks about is nt applicable to to the facts I had reported. Of course, what I said was not an appraisal, just a pretty rough guestimate. A larger number of sales, an inspection of Arny's house, and more detailed information regarding the neighborhood would be required for an actual appraisal. I felt that I was being fair to Arny, and just reporting facts as I saw them. I did point out that the assessment itself is not at all an indication of value, as assessments in his community are much lower than actual market values. ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#295
|
|||
|
|||
Hafler (the first MOSFET? I don't think so)
"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "S888Wheel" wrote in message Sockpuppet, why don't you check the listing services like Weil did to see what houses in my immediate neighborhood sell for. Ooops I forgot, you don't know how to do research on the web. LOL you don't want to answer the question. Figures. Sour Grapes all over again. Here's the MLS number of the house across the street which is for sale: 30175404 Type it in he http://www.realestateone.com/indexII.cfm Then consider that my house is just plain larger - significantly more square feet, bigger lot, 2 full baths, 5 bedrooms, etc. Then consider the fact that the price multiplier for the prices of houses in the LA area versus houses in suburban Detroit is about 3. Enjoy! Although assessed at $130,650, I would say the it would sell for about $260,000. Ignorance is bliss and Yustabe is more ignorant than most... More details about Yustabe's ignorance below. I checked recent sales on his street, vs., assessments, and found that assessments are about 50% of the recent sales prices. There's a hidden agenda item about property assessments in Michigan that you're not taking into consideration, Yustabe. Note, it makes a big difference in this specific comparison. Hint: I probably owned this house when sockpuppet wheel graduated from college. 1589 Prestwick sold for $250,000 in 2000. The 2002 assessment on that one was $124,700 Now that's interesting, because there was not a change of occupant, but there was a death in the family. I mentioned the offering price of that house to my daughter, and she agreed that it is ahem, priced to sell. Another house across the street sold for about 10% more about a year ago, and the two houses are very comparable. The rule of thumb in Michigan is that assessed valuations are exactly 1/2 of estimated sales price, except for that hidden agenda item I alluded to that significantly depresses the assessed value of my house. But I would not agree that the multiplier for LA is 3. As usual, it depends on exactly what you're comparing, but in the specific context... Not a bad job of data stalking, Yustabe! too bad you're so ignorant of all the relevant facts. Of course, not being based in Michigan, I don't have all the facts. Being ignorant never seems to stop you from shooting off your mouth about me, Yustabe. But I did report those that I had found. I did notice that there are two assessment amounts for each property, one that is based upon valuation, and one that is used for applying the tax rate. In some cases they are identical, in other cases they are close to each other, and some cases there is a great variation. That might be what Arny is referring to, that there might be a break for long time homeowners. You ought to talk to a long-term homeowner from California about that - it's a better-known case. Sockpuppet wheel probably doesn't qualify. He probably paid sucker's prices and quotes sucker's prices. I suspect the both of you buy audio components with no more wisdom than you buy houses. At any rate, I used the 'valuaton' assessment in my comparisons, rather than the variable assessment. So (still not knowing the absolute facts) I suspect the agenda ARny talks about is not applicable to the facts I had reported. Being ignorant never seems to stop you from shooting off your mouth about me, Yustabe. Of course, what I said was not an appraisal, just a pretty rough guestimate. A larger number of sales, an inspection of Arny's house, and more detailed information regarding the neighborhood would be required for an actual appraisal. Being ignorant never seems to stop you from shooting off your mouth about me, Yustabe. I felt that I was being fair to Arny, and just reporting facts as I saw them. Being ignorant never seems to stop you from shooting off your mouth about me, Yustabe. Let's talk about your recent lies about the foundation of my house, as an even more clear-cut example Yustabe. You're both swinging from your own yardarms on the class envy issue. I did point out that the assessment itself is not at all an indication of value, as assessments in his community are much lower than actual market values. By almost exactly half. What you also can't consider is the degree to which personally negotiating with the local assessor can mitigate relatively high local taxes. Bottom line Yustabe, even your highly-flawed brush with the true facts shows you and the other sockpuppet twin to be monumental liars. Again. |
#296
|
|||
|
|||
Hafler (the first MOSFET? I don't think so)
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... Let's talk about your recent lies about the foundation of my house, as an even more clear-cut example Yustabe. You're both swinging from your own yardarms on the class envy issue. I reported what you had said. Then I discovered that you expunged your post from the archives, to try and cover your tracks. I found my post, prior to yours, and my next post in the thread, subesequent to yours. Now, in that subsequent thread, I found some of your verbage form the missing post, I retained it in my reply. In that verbage you deprecate the problems in the condition of your home Those are your words, and they are saved. ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#297
|
|||
|
|||
Hafler (the first MOSFET? I don't think so)
"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... Let's talk about your recent lies about the foundation of my house, as an even more clear-cut example Yustabe. You're both swinging from your own yardarms on the class envy issue. I reported what you had said. That's another lie. Then I discovered that you expunged your post from the archives, to try and cover your tracks. That's yet another lie. I found my post, prior to yours, and my next post in the thread, subsequent to yours. Now, in that subsequent thread, I found some of your verbiage form the missing post, I retained it in my reply. In that verbiage you deprecate the problems in the condition of your home Those are your words, and they are saved. If they are saved, then you can reproduce them, Yustabe. You're doing good Yustabe. I caught you in one lie, and you told two more as part of your cover-up. |
#298
|
|||
|
|||
Hafler (the first MOSFET? I don't think so)
"The Radioactive Ninja Titboxer" wrote in message
news:ikqa00djre09ru6bvkjbc57t9e4vn27ccl@rdmzrnewst xt.nz On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:43:06 -0500, "Arny Krueger" wrote: Why are you so insecure you have to keep whining about how inferior vinyl and valves are? What insecurity? I'm just having fun with local members of two noisy, mislead and misleading religious sects - vinylism and tubism. Surely you must realise that you're ill? I mean, come on now. Someone who eats **** of their own volition must know they have bigger problems than halitosis and a scarcity of party invitations. Do you really want to tell us about your problems with coprophilia, ninja? Vinyl and tubes in their place are fine - I own both kinds of equipment and use it appropriately and in moderation. So why keep on whining about it? It is you that was whining, ninja. Why don't you admit that you hate music, hate your stereos (such as they are), and hate other people enjoying themselves in a hobby that utterly confounds you? That would be a lie. Based on your posting history, those comments would appear to be autobiographical, ninja. And now for your *next* IKYABWAI . . . So ninja you're trying to convince us that you don't have a problem with taking responsibility for your own actions? |
#299
|
|||
|
|||
Arny proven to be a cheat, liar and coward
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... Let's talk about your recent lies about the foundation of my house, as an even more clear-cut example Yustabe. You're both swinging from your own yardarms on the class envy issue. I reported what you had said. That's another lie. Then I discovered that you expunged your post from the archives, to try and cover your tracks. That's yet another lie. I found my post, prior to yours, and my next post in the thread, subsequent to yours. Now, in that subsequent thread, I found some of your verbiage form the missing post, I retained it in my reply. In that verbiage you deprecate the problems in the condition of your home Those are your words, and they are saved. If they are saved, then you can reproduce them, Yustabe. I did it once, I will do it again: I posted a message, this is the header: From: "Sockpuppet Yustabe" Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion References: Subject: Note to Arny Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 08:06:33 -0500 Lines: 32 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Message-ID: X-Authenticated-User: $$ecperu X-Comments: This message was posted through A href X-Comments2: IMPORTANT: Newsfeed.com does not condone, X-Report: Please report illegal or inappropriate use to Organization: Newsfeeds.com http://www.newsfeeds.com 100,000+ UNCENSORED Newsgroups. Path: text-west!not-for-mail Xref: 127.0.0.1 rec.audio.opinion:547639 saying: "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message Maybe Dr. Richman can straighten us out. Even though he's badly bent, he might be able to help the members of your clique. One bad batch of sick puppies! Is your ass sucking a sexually driven behavior, or are there entirely different motives? We have a far longer track record of that kind of behavior among the members of your clique, sockupppet. Let him analyze that! BTW sockpuppet, why aren't all the "seekers of truth" in your clique excoriating you for your big lie about my house? I didn't say anything at all about your house. I talked about what you liked in a house. Yes, I knew it would draw out an admission form you that you enjoyed the amenities of a boutique built house, to demonstrate your hypocricy in criticizing boutique audio componenets. I suckered you inot that one real good! You are so incredibly STUPID! ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- Then, in response, you posted THE MESSAGE IN QUESTION which you later removed from records, to cover your tracks from your emabarrasing statement. And to your MESSAGE IN QUESTION, I replied thus: header being: rom: "Sockpuppet Yustabe" Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion References: Subject: Watch Yustabe wriggle, he's caught in a big lie. Middiius was right about how stupid he is. Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 18:55:24 -0500 Lines: 61 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Message-ID: X-Authenticated-User: $$ecperu X-Comments: This message was posted through A href X-Comments2: IMPORTANT: Newsfeed.com does not condone, X-Report: Please report illegal or inappropriate use to Organization: Newsfeeds.com http://www.newsfeeds.com 100,000+ UNCENSORED Newsgroups. Path: text-west!not-for-mail Xref: 127.0.0.1 rec.audio.opinion:547738 and message being: "Arny Krueger" wrote in message news "Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message Maybe Dr. Richman can straighten us out. Even though he's badly bent, he might be able to help the members of your clique. One bad batch of sick puppies! Is your ass sucking a sexually driven behavior, or are there entirely different motives? We have a far longer track record of that kind of behavior among the members of your clique, sockpuppet. Let him analyze that! BTW sockpuppet, why aren't all the "seekers of truth" in your clique excoriating you for your big lie about my house? I didn't say anything at all about your house. From: "Sockpuppet Yustabe" Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 17:51:05 -0500 Message-ID: "Arny prefers to live in a cookie cutter high volume production home, rather than in a custom home produced by a 'boutique' builder." I talked about what you liked in a house. Nope. Learn to read what you wrote, sockpuppet. You called it a "...cookie cutter high volume production home...". Yes, I knew it would draw out an admission form you that you enjoyed the amenities of a boutique built house, to demonstrate your hypocricy in criticizing boutique audio componenets (sic). I bought the house primarily because it was cheap, had lots of room for kids, and was in the right school district. The "amenities" included lots of structural problems and impractical *features*. You're such a stupid liar, sockpuppet. Just like the rest of your clique. "Arny prefers to live in a cookie cutter high volume production home, rather than in a custom home produced by a 'boutique' builder." prefer: like better; value more highly (from Merriam Webster Dictionary) ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- Note that in my response, I quoted 'part' of your expunged post, in which you admitted that your house has, and I quote you, "lots of strutural problems". Earlier in the expunged message, you delineated one of them as being a crumbling foundation. Again, you are proven to be a cheat, liar and coward. ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#301
|
|||
|
|||
Arny proven to be a cheat, liar and coward
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... Let's talk about your recent lies about the foundation of my house, as an even more clear-cut example Yustabe. You're both swinging from your own yardarms on the class envy issue. I reported what you had said. That's another lie. Then I discovered that you expunged your post from the archives, to try and cover your tracks. That's yet another lie. I found my post, prior to yours, and my next post in the thread, subsequent to yours. Now, in that subsequent thread, I found some of your verbiage form the missing post, I retained it in my reply. In that verbiage you deprecate the problems in the condition of your home Those are your words, and they are saved. If they are saved, then you can reproduce them, Yustabe. I did it once, I will do it again: I posted a message, this is the header: From: "Sockpuppet Yustabe" Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion References: Subject: Note to Arny Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 08:06:33 -0500 Lines: 32 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Message-ID: X-Authenticated-User: $$ecperu X-Comments: This message was posted through A href X-Comments2: IMPORTANT: Newsfeed.com does not condone, X-Report: Please report illegal or inappropriate use to Organization: Newsfeeds.com http://www.newsfeeds.com 100,000+ UNCENSORED Newsgroups. Path: text-west!not-for-mail Xref: 127.0.0.1 rec.audio.opinion:547639 saying: "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message Maybe Dr. Richman can straighten us out. Even though he's badly bent, he might be able to help the members of your clique. One bad batch of sick puppies! Is your ass sucking a sexually driven behavior, or are there entirely different motives? We have a far longer track record of that kind of behavior among the members of your clique, sockupppet. Let him analyze that! BTW sockpuppet, why aren't all the "seekers of truth" in your clique excoriating you for your big lie about my house? I didn't say anything at all about your house. Never ever? LOL! Yustabe, you've been talking about my house for at least 11 months. I talked about what you liked in a house. Which involved talking about my house. How stupid do you think people on RAO are, eh Yustabe? Yes, I knew it would draw out an admission form you that you enjoyed the amenities of a boutique built house, to demonstrate your hypocricy in criticizing boutique audio componenets. And you were wrong, Yustabe. In the process you made specific false claims about my house, which you have just admitted were bald-faced, premeditated lies. I suckered you inot that one real good! Yustabe you lied and lied and lied, real good! BTW, thanks about bragging about your lying. You are so incredibly STUPID! Yes, Yustabe, I'm so stupid that I suckered you into bragging about the lies you told in a vain effort to make a debating point that nobody really cares about. Then, in response, you posted THE MESSAGE IN QUESTION which you later removed from records, to cover your tracks from your emabarrasing statement. That's another lie from a proven liar. And to your MESSAGE IN QUESTION, I replied thus: header being: rom: "Sockpuppet Yustabe" Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion References: This message is retrievable: http://www.google.com/groups?safe=im...umsgid=vvk6mjs This message is retrievable: http://www.google.com/groups?safe=im...umsgid=aaydnX0 This message is retrievable: http://www.google.com/groups?safe=im...umsgid=y6udnXw &lr=&hl=en This message is retrievable: http://www.google.com/groups?safe=im...umsgid=oYidnTN Subject: Watch Yustabe wriggle, he's caught in a big lie. Middiius was right about how stupid he is. Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 18:55:24 -0500 Lines: 61 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Message-ID: X-Authenticated-User: $$ecperu X-Comments: This message was posted through A href X-Comments2: IMPORTANT: Newsfeed.com does not condone, X-Report: Please report illegal or inappropriate use to Organization: Newsfeeds.com http://www.newsfeeds.com 100,000+ UNCENSORED Newsgroups. Path: text-west!not-for-mail Xref: 127.0.0.1 rec.audio.opinion:547738 and message being: "Arny Krueger" wrote in message news "Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message Maybe Dr. Richman can straighten us out. Even though he's badly bent, he might be able to help the members of your clique. One bad batch of sick puppies! Is your ass sucking a sexually driven behavior, or are there entirely different motives? We have a far longer track record of that kind of behavior among the members of your clique, sockpuppet. Let him analyze that! BTW sockpuppet, why aren't all the "seekers of truth" in your clique excoriating you for your big lie about my house? I didn't say anything at all about your house. From: "Sockpuppet Yustabe" Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 17:51:05 -0500 Message-ID: "Arny prefers to live in a cookie cutter high volume production home, rather than in a custom home produced by a 'boutique' builder." I talked about what you liked in a house. Nope. Learn to read what you wrote, sockpuppet. You called it a "...cookie cutter high volume production home...". Yes, I knew it would draw out an admission form you that you enjoyed the amenities of a boutique built house, to demonstrate your hypocricy in criticizing boutique audio componenets (sic). I bought the house primarily because it was cheap, had lots of room for kids, and was in the right school district. The "amenities" included lots of structural problems and impractical *features*. You're such a stupid liar, sockpuppet. Just like the rest of your clique. "Arny prefers to live in a cookie cutter high volume production home, rather than in a custom home produced by a 'boutique' builder." prefer: like better; value more highly (from Merriam Webster Dictionary) ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- Note that in my response, I quoted 'part' of your expunged post, in which you admitted that your house has, and I quote you, "lots of strutural problems". Earlier in the expunged message, you delineated one of them as being a crumbling foundation. There is no crumbling foundation on my house. Therefore, I would never mention it. It's a figment of your over-active imagination, Yustabe. Yustabe, I hvae not expunged a message from google for years and years, not this decade, not this century, not even this millenium, so this is just another one of your lies Again, you are proven to be a cheat, liar and coward. While you can fantasize that I expunged a message, no way can I expunge all references to it if anybody replied to it. As I showed, in your prime piece of evidence claiming that there was an expunged message, there is no evidence of an expunged message. So Yuastabe where is this message that you are claiming I expunged, where is there a reference to it, except among your vacuous lies? Tell us about the "lots of structural problems". ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#302
|
|||
|
|||
Arny proven to be a cheat, liar and coward
"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message
Tell us about the "lots of structural problems". Admit that you lied about the alleged foundation problems, first. |
#303
|
|||
|
|||
Arny proven to be a cheat, liar and coward
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message Tell us about the "lots of structural problems". Admit that you lied about the alleged foundation problems, first. $78,000 per year. ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#304
|
|||
|
|||
Arny proven to be a cheat, liar and coward
Sockpuppet Yustabe said to Toilet Breath: So Yuastabe where is this message that you are claiming I expunged Tell us about the "lots of structural problems". That probably means his toilet is once again flushing, depriving him of his regular "fishing" expeditions. |
#305
|
|||
|
|||
Arny proven to be a cheat, liar and coward
"George M. Middius" wrote in message
Sockpuppet Yustabe said to Toilet Breath: So Yuastabe where is this message that you are claiming I expunged Tell us about the "lots of structural problems". That probably means his toilet is once again flushing, depriving him of his regular "fishing" expeditions. The old one never ceased doing its job, but it is true we recently upgraded it to one of Toto's finer modern pieces in the interest of water conservation. |
#306
|
|||
|
|||
Arny proven to be a cheat, liar and coward
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message news "George M. Middius" wrote in message Sockpuppet Yustabe said to Toilet Breath: So Yuastabe where is this message that you are claiming I expunged Tell us about the "lots of structural problems". That probably means his toilet is once again flushing, depriving him of his regular "fishing" expeditions. The old one never ceased doing its job, but it is true we recently upgraded it to one of Toto's finer modern pieces in the interest of water conservation. Arny hates to dilute his turds. ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#307
|
|||
|
|||
Arny proven to be a cheat, liar and coward
"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message news "George M. Middius" wrote in message Sockpuppet Yustabe said to Toilet Breath: So Yuastabe where is this message that you are claiming I expunged Tell us about the "lots of structural problems". That probably means his toilet is once again flushing, depriving him of his regular "fishing" expeditions. The old one never ceased doing its job, but it is true we recently upgraded it to one of Toto's finer modern pieces in the interest of water conservation. Arny hates to dilute his turds. I don't want to disappoint you, Yustabe. |
#308
|
|||
|
|||
Hafler (the first MOSFET? I don't think so)
"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message ... "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message ... "Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message ... "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message ... "Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message ... "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message ... "Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message ... "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message ... "=(8888)=" wrote in message ... "Sander deWaal" emitted : I still have a Sony amp from 1975, but they used VFETS, not MOSFET's. If you overlook the device construction difference, then I think Sony were the first to use high power FET's in a power amp. Sony invented the VFET, the Hitachi power MosFET's came later. IIRC, Yamaha had an amp around that time (B1 or B2?) with 2SK77 MOSFETS. A giant beast, and those transistors looked like 2N3055s on steroids (twice the size of a TO-3) . Cool! What is the general consensus for the sound of MOSFET amps? I had a Session guitar amp that employed MOSFETs, was very clean but clinical sounding vs tube amps. Like home hi fi amps guitar amps made with tubes generate Euphonic distortion, that is distortion that pleases the ear, or at least the person playing a guitar through one. Tube amps are preferred by many if not most guitar players because they distort in a way that allows them another way to create. MOSFET's don't distort audibly unless over driven (or badly designed or broken). For other instruments MOSFET would be the more likely choice. Generally, tube guitar amp distortion is different from that of an audio tube amp. It is purposefully accentuated. Which is the point I was making. They do things with distortion that SS amps don't and therefore are useful in helping the guitarist express himself. Most guitar palyers would find an audio tube amp, outfitted with appropriate inputs, useless. So do most audiophiles, but that's not the point I was making. Tubes distort. The distortion of tube amp that a guitar player might use is useful for creating music. The distortion an tube used in a home hi-fi creates, is just distortion. That some persons like that distortion is their choice. It is not the same distortion, so please don't compare them. Of course it is. Tubes are tubes and they have specific characteristics, one of them is how they clip. first of all, that is not linear, and second of all, there is more to the amp and its circuitry than just the tubes. After all, the tubes don't exist in a vacuum!!! It just shows how naive and simplistic you are. If one were to play a cd throught an audio tube amp and a guitar tube amp, iven the same speakers, it would sound quite different. I never said they wouldn't. I said they create the same kind of distortion. Why is that hard to grasp? ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#309
|
|||
|
|||
Hafler (the first MOSFET? I don't think so)
"dave weil" wrote in message ... On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:00:53 +0000 (UTC), (Stewart Pinkerton) wrote: On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:55:21 -0600, dave weil wrote: On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:59:58 -0500, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message After all, the tubes don't exist in a vacuum!!! We've got to memorialize this post somewhere. It's an all-time classic. Yes, there's probably a tube or two still in outer space. Still as dumb as a rock, huh Vile? Actually, there *are* lots of thermionic valves (tubes to you) which live in vacuum chambers, and don't have envelopes of their own. I don't believe that I said "the *only* tubes in a vacuum are in outer space". Leave it to you to take a humorous comment as some sort of "factual comment". Did you not have your daily litre of scotch yet? I love talking to a person whose name equates the size of his member with the last finger on his hand. I thought you and Trotsky broke up. :-) |
#310
|
|||
|
|||
Hafler (the first MOSFET? I don't think so)
On Sat, 17 Jan 2004 14:06:39 -0800, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote: "dave weil" wrote in message .. . On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:00:53 +0000 (UTC), (Stewart Pinkerton) wrote: On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:55:21 -0600, dave weil wrote: On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:59:58 -0500, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message After all, the tubes don't exist in a vacuum!!! We've got to memorialize this post somewhere. It's an all-time classic. Yes, there's probably a tube or two still in outer space. Still as dumb as a rock, huh Vile? Actually, there *are* lots of thermionic valves (tubes to you) which live in vacuum chambers, and don't have envelopes of their own. I don't believe that I said "the *only* tubes in a vacuum are in outer space". Leave it to you to take a humorous comment as some sort of "factual comment". Did you not have your daily litre of scotch yet? I love talking to a person whose name equates the size of his member with the last finger on his hand. I thought you and Trotsky broke up. :-) Only took you 5 days to think that one up. Maybe the smart pills are working... |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Book Review: Home Theater For Everyone: A Practical Guide ; Harley, Holman | General | |||
When did home theater take over? | Audio Opinions | |||
Home Theater "Junkyard Wars" | Audio Opinions | |||
Home theater recommandation please | General | |||
Home Theater Recommendation | Audio Opinions |