Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Why are most subwoofers rectangular?
Most subwoofer manufacturers recommend corner placement. Seems to me that a 3
sided enclosure would be ideal, yet that's not the norm. Why is that? It's probably cheaper to make a regular box but with so many high priced subs available, I doubt that's the reason- |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Cheaper and EASIER!
Takes more cabinetry skill and expense to make triangular enclosures. The Marti-Logan subs are nice; though not triangular, the design is said (by them) to decrease distortion. "CCSman" wrote in message ... Most subwoofer manufacturers recommend corner placement. Seems to me that a 3 sided enclosure would be ideal, yet that's not the norm. Why is that? It's probably cheaper to make a regular box but with so many high priced subs available, I doubt that's the reason- |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
That's the reason. Why would you want to pay more for the same options
unless it is just to save space? Most makers like to keep a range of product looking similar as well. I never recommend corner placement as a rule, but it can work in some situations where space is limited or the xover frequency is very low. Tannoy actually makes a corner sub and it is triangular. It is also more expensive than their square options. In a rather neat placement option, it can be hung at any height on the walls corner, so ceiling placement is an option if you want the floor space badly. Companies that shape them in other styles do so to try to appeal to people who just want something different or feel that it may be superior for some reason. The best boom for your buck is square man, like L7. It also has space saving appeal as most rooms are square and so most furniture follows suit. -Bill www.uptownaudio.com Roanoke VA (540) 343-1250 "CCSman" wrote in message ... Most subwoofer manufacturers recommend corner placement. Seems to me that a 3 sided enclosure would be ideal, yet that's not the norm. Why is that? It's probably cheaper to make a regular box but with so many high priced subs available, I doubt that's the reason- |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Seems to me that a 3
sided enclosure would be ideal... I am so literal minded that it is a handicap. I can't imagine a three sided three-dimensional object. I need some help visualizing this, as everything I visualize has four sides, though I suppose a sphere could be said to have one side, half a sphere two sides, and so on. Wylie Williams |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Uptown Audio wrote:
That's the reason. Why would you want to pay more for the same options unless it is just to save space? Most makers like to keep a range of product looking similar as well. I never recommend corner placement as a rule, but it can work in some situations where space is limited or the xover frequency is very low. I've response mapped over a dozen rooms for single subwoofer placement and in every case with one exception corner placement provided the best response at the main and up to 2 other listening psoitions what weere actially used in those rooms. I was initially surprised but there's a good reason for this. The biggest in-room subwoofer problem is adequate SPL at low frequencies; but the 2nd biggest problem is the presence of nulls (or sometimes peaks) in reponse caused by modal interaction relative to the wavelength of the sound. (20 Hz has a wvavelength over 50 feet long.) In a typical room there will only be 5 modes active below 100 Hz and any location that fails to excite any one of them will leave a hole in response. The ONLY location that will excite all low frequency modes is a closed-corner (one with at least 5-6 feet of wall to both sides) meaning that the best listening position response will be most likely attained with a corner locus. Response won't be perfect but in most cases it will as smooth as you can get. Another option is to place the subwoofer close (in the direct field) to the listener. This is complicated because listening positions tend to be in nulls and things like suspension and port noises will draw attention of the subwoofer. Tannoy actually makes a corner sub and it is triangular. It is also more expensive than their square options. In a rather neat placement option, it can be hung at any height on the walls corner, so ceiling placement is an option if you want the floor space badly. I've tested the Tannoy tri-angle. It's a nice touch but the subwoofer itself lacks sufficient displacement to deliver adequate SPL at low frequencies. Companies that shape them in other styles do so to try to appeal to people who just want something different or feel that it may be superior for some reason. The best boom for your buck is square man, like L7. It also has space saving appeal as most rooms are square and so most furniture follows suit. -Bill www.uptownaudio.com Roanoke VA (540) 343-1250 IMO a tall rectangle is the best floor space saver and an optimal enclosure shape. I'm surprised that there aren't' more floor standing coat-closet-like or crystal closet shapes that are made to resemble furniture. Or more subwoofers made to look like structure such as a corner "column' painted or wallpapered to match the walls. "CCSman" wrote in message ... Most subwoofer manufacturers recommend corner placement. Seems to me that a 3 sided enclosure would be ideal, yet that's not the norm. Why is that? It's probably cheaper to make a regular box but with so many high priced subs available, I doubt that's the reason- |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
(Nousaine) wrote in message ...
Stewart Pinkerton wrote: On 30 Sep 2004 00:25:57 GMT, (CCSman) wrote: Most subwoofer manufacturers recommend corner placement. Seems to me that a 3 sided enclosure would be ideal, yet that's not the norm. Why is that? It's probably cheaper to make a regular box but with so many high priced subs available, I doubt that's the reason- I take it that you actually mean a tetrahedron. Bear in mind however that with an upperv limit of say 100Hz, one wavelength is about 11 feet, and you'll see that, so long as the driver is within a couple of feet of the room corner, it doesn't really matter. Hence, a Cube, which gives you the maximum volume of any recangular enclosure, is an ideal shape for getting a big driver tucked well into the room corner. A sphere would be stronger and more voluminous for the same maximum dimension, but significantly more expensive to build. Note that B&W have just released a very compact spherical subwoofer, with balanced drivers. -- Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering The "easiest" subwoofer I ever built was a cylinder made of Sonotube (the cardboard concrete former used on those bridges.) I went to a construction supply house and had then cut-off a 6.5-foot of 28-inch i.d. Sonotube and hauled it home strapped atop a '74 Volvo 164. The actual subwoofer was built in an afternoon and consisted of cutting a pair of circular end-pieces of which the top-piece had a cut-out for the 18-inch driver and a pair of 6-inch holes for the vents. The unit was 'finished' with birled walnut vinyl wrap. The subwoofer had an internal volume of 25-ft3 was tuned to 12.5 Hz and produced an honest sub-16 Hz in room and consumed a relatively . Facing up and shoved as far as possible into a corner the enclosure was within 1.5 feet of the ceiling and consumed less than 5 ft2 of floor space. While the unit resisted balloning very well there was quite a bit of bending force along the length of the tower which could be felt if you wrapped your arms around it while it was playing. Lengthwise or circumferential bracing is a fix but one could consider a 2-walled cylinder with a smaller Sonotube placed inside a larger one with bracing or damping material poured between the two. Anyway it was a great project; inexpensive, easy to build and better performing commerical subwoofer product available at that time (1979 I think.) Now that's what I call a cool project! I guess it would be also theoretically possible to mount a driver on each end in a similar project which would cancel some stray mechanical energy. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS/FT: Misc Car audio, mostly subwoofers | Car Audio | |||
Old Hollywood subwoofers and in house enclosure | Car Audio | |||
Subwoofers, the specs don't matter! | Audio Opinions | |||
One amp for two subwoofers? | Car Audio | |||
who makes good 8" subwoofers now a days | Car Audio |