(Edward Green) wrote in
om:

Bob Cain wrote in message
...
Bob Cain wrote:



snip......snip


The answer turns out to be simple. If the velocity and
position of the particles moving about their rest position
at the origin are

Vp(t) = Sp'(t)

then the flow velocity of the particles in the plane of the
origin is

Vf(t) = Vp(t + Sp(t)/c)

and the pressure there is

P(t) = Ra*Vf(t)


snip.......snip

I've been glancing at the this thread for a while, and annoyance
overcomes trepedation: would you mind defining a few of your terms
for the benefit of those who might not know all the standard
abbreviations of acoustics? This is a general forum, after all, and
it's not a sign of weakness on your part to eschew only talking to
insiders, rather a sign of strength.

You might also confirm whether by "particle velocity" you really mean
local continuum velocity.


snip....snip


Bob Cain can't define or explain what he means because he doesn't know what
he means. All he is doing at this point is fabricating totally meaningless
terminology and pulling equations out of thin air. What he is saying
doesn't make sense because it is literally nonsense. I too was fooled
into thinking that Bob Cain was attempting to present the beginning of a
meaningful analysis. I then realized that the real analysis was done for
Bob by zigoteau in a previous thread. If you are inerested in the real
analysis, I suggest that you read zigoteau's posts. They are, however,
lengthy, and you will have to edit out all of Bob Cains naive and mostly
senseless and irrelevant questions and comments. I found the best way to
do this was to copy/past all of zigoteau's posts into msword and edit out
everything but the mathematical analysis and then print it out.

The Ghost wrote:


Bob Cain can't define or explain what he means because he doesn't know what
he means.

You have obviously not grasped the simplicty of what I wrote
and the clarification of it that you asked for. I doubt
you've even read it. It merely answers the question "what
is the pressure at a point in a plane wave as a function of
the motion of the particles about that point" in a simple
and direct way. One that even you could understand if you
wished to.

It's not at all complicated, Gary, and is the answer that
should have been given long ago when I first began asking
about it. I challenged you any number of times to produce
it if you knew it.

Enough of this. I've got what I came for.


Bob
--

"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no
simpler."

A. Einstein

The Ghost wrote:


Bob Cain can't define or explain what he means because he doesn't know what
he means.

You have obviously not grasped the simplicty of what I wrote
and the clarification of it that you asked for. I doubt
you've even read it. It merely answers the question "what
is the pressure at a point in a plane wave as a function of
the motion of the particles about that point" in a simple
and direct way. One that even you could understand if you
wished to.

It's not at all complicated, Gary, and is the answer that
should have been given long ago when I first began asking
about it. I challenged you any number of times to produce
it if you knew it.

Enough of this. I've got what I came for.


Bob
--

"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no
simpler."

A. Einstein

Bob Cain wrote in
:



The Ghost wrote:


Bob Cain can't define or explain what he means because he doesn't
know what he means.

You have obviously not grasped the simplicty of what I wrote
and the clarification of it that you asked for. I doubt
you've even read it. It merely answers the question "what
is the pressure at a point in a plane wave as a function of
the motion of the particles about that point" in a simple
and direct way. One that even you could understand if you
wished to.

You are correct, I have not grasped the simplicity of what you wrote, and
the reason is because what you wrote is little more than nonsensical
gibberish. The fact of the matter is that the problem is not with my
inability to grasp what you have done, the problem is with your inability
to present what you have done in a coherent and sensible manner.


It's not at all complicated, Gary, and is the answer that
should have been given long ago when I first began asking
about it. I challenged you any number of times to produce
it if you knew it.


You have been insulting me in alt.sci.physics.acoustics for over four
years, and you find it odd that I would not give you the time of day if
your life depended on it? Get a reality check and stop confusing
capability with motivation. Art Ludwig gave you the analysis that you
requested and you spit in his face, walked away and came here begging for
someone else to provide you with an analysis that you might be able to
understand. If I were you, I wouldn't expect any help on other problems
from Art anytime soon.

Enough of this. I've got what I came for.
Bob


That you have, and apparently to hell with anyone else reading this thread
who might want to benefit from the help that you have received and from
what you have done (whatever that might be).

Bob Cain wrote in
:



The Ghost wrote:


Bob Cain can't define or explain what he means because he doesn't
know what he means.

You have obviously not grasped the simplicty of what I wrote
and the clarification of it that you asked for. I doubt
you've even read it. It merely answers the question "what
is the pressure at a point in a plane wave as a function of
the motion of the particles about that point" in a simple
and direct way. One that even you could understand if you
wished to.

You are correct, I have not grasped the simplicity of what you wrote, and
the reason is because what you wrote is little more than nonsensical
gibberish. The fact of the matter is that the problem is not with my
inability to grasp what you have done, the problem is with your inability
to present what you have done in a coherent and sensible manner.


It's not at all complicated, Gary, and is the answer that
should have been given long ago when I first began asking
about it. I challenged you any number of times to produce
it if you knew it.


You have been insulting me in alt.sci.physics.acoustics for over four
years, and you find it odd that I would not give you the time of day if
your life depended on it? Get a reality check and stop confusing
capability with motivation. Art Ludwig gave you the analysis that you
requested and you spit in his face, walked away and came here begging for
someone else to provide you with an analysis that you might be able to
understand. If I were you, I wouldn't expect any help on other problems
from Art anytime soon.

Enough of this. I've got what I came for.
Bob


That you have, and apparently to hell with anyone else reading this thread
who might want to benefit from the help that you have received and from
what you have done (whatever that might be).

The Ghost wrote:

If I were you, I wouldn't expect any help on other problems
from Art anytime soon.

Do you speak for Art Ludwig now? Have you, at any point,
spoken _as_ Art Ludwig?


Bob
--

"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no
simpler."

A. Einstein

The Ghost wrote:

If I were you, I wouldn't expect any help on other problems
from Art anytime soon.

Do you speak for Art Ludwig now? Have you, at any point,
spoken _as_ Art Ludwig?


Bob
--

"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no
simpler."

A. Einstein

Bob Cain wrote in message ...
The Ghost wrote:

If I were you, I wouldn't expect any help on other problems
from Art anytime soon.

Do you speak for Art Ludwig now? Have you, at any point,
spoken _as_ Art Ludwig?

What do you think, or do you just enjoy asking stupid questions?

The Ghost wrote:

Do you speak for Art Ludwig now? Have you, at any point,
spoken _as_ Art Ludwig?

What do you think, or do you just enjoy asking stupid questions?

That wasn't an answer, it was a question to avoid one. But
we know how adept you are at avoiding giving answers. I
don't suppose, however, that you need to be particularly
adept if you have none to offer.


Bob
--

"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no
simpler."

A. Einstein

Bob Cain wrote in
:



The Ghost wrote:

Do you speak for Art Ludwig now? Have you, at any point,
spoken _as_ Art Ludwig?

What do you think, or do you just enjoy asking stupid questions?

That wasn't an answer, it was a question to avoid one. But
we know how adept you are at avoiding giving answers. I
don't suppose, however, that you need to be particularly
adept if you have none to offer.


In the distant past, you asked questions and I answered them. That was
before you started ****ing in my face. Right now, I wouldn't give you the
time of day if your pathetic existence depended on it. Call me whatever
you wish, but know that in my opinion you are demonstrably one of the
stupidest ****s I have encountered in any of the newsgroups, and that your
opinion of me, whatever it may be, is irrelevant and of no practical
consequence.

The Ghost wrote:

In the distant past, you asked questions and I answered them.
that was before you started ****ing in my face.

From the gitgo with me you were Gary Sokolich as we have all
come to know and love him. You tried to suck up at one point
to get my assistance in doing something relative to Kliff
Kaminsky who you had ****ed off enough that you were afraid.
Something to do with you calling the management of the
company he worked for to complain about how he treated you on
the internet. I wanted nothing to do with it (d'oh) and you
returned to your prior behavior with a vengence. That is how
our fascinating relationship began and I can prove it, not
that anybody else could give a rusty ****.

I saw very quickly how crazy you were and thought it best
to document it.

Did you succeed, BTW, in screwing him over? Where is he now?

Yes, I frequently warned others who you unexpectedly savaged
in response to an honest question that the problem was you
and not them. That was about ****ing on your sick parade.
Your face hadn't occured to me.

Right now, I wouldn't give you the
time of day if your pathetic existence depended on it. Call me whatever
you wish, but know that in my opinion you are demonstrably one of the
stupidest ****s I have encountered in any of the newsgroups, and that your
opinion of me, whatever it may be, is irrelevant and of no practical
consequence.

You really are crazy. Creepy, scary crazy.


Bob
--

"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler."

A. Einstein

Bob Cain wrote in message ...


snip....snip

You tried to suck up at one point
to get my assistance in doing something relative to Kliff
Kaminsky....

snip....snip


I saw very quickly how crazy you were and thought it best
to document it.

Did you succeed, BTW, in screwing him over?

You bet. I persuaded the Almighty to deal with him appropriately.

http://www.geocitiehttp://www.lcanim...aro040606.html
http://www.lcanimal.org/event/event_034.htm

Keep that in mind, because now you are the one who is at the top of my
**** list.


Where is he now?

Exactly where he belongs and exactly where you are headed.

snip....snip

You really are crazy. Creepy, scary crazy.
Bob

You label, discredit and condemn yourself by your own words, which I
quote verbatim as follows:

"Something I've found to be universal and almost always true
is that one must look at what an individual consistently
accuses others of to discover the true nature of that
individual. It is there that he paints his self portrait
and it is that part of himself that he most hates which he
projects onto others in the most hateful, repellent and
offensive ways.
Bob"

http://www.google.com/groups?hl=en&l...om%26rnum%3D14

The Ghost wrote:

Did you succeed, BTW, in screwing him over?

You bet. I persuaded the Almighty to deal with him appropriately.

http://www.geocitiehttp://www.lcanim...aro040606.html
http://www.lcanimal.org/event/event_034.htm

Keep that in mind, because now you are the one who is at the top of my
**** list.

Where is he now?

Exactly where he belongs and exactly where you are headed.

Hmmm, this is a demonstration of sanity? It's probably
prosecutable.

You had better get to some meetings, Gary, before the
wreckage gets completely out of hand. It's time to put the
plug in the jug again. A few weeks in a detox might also be
of some help. That is probably much better than waking up
in four point restraints wondering where you are and how you
got there.

Hey, if, after you get your feet back on the ground, you
need a sponser...


You label, discredit and condemn yourself by your own words, which I
quote verbatim as follows:

"Something I've found to be universal and almost always true
is that one must look at what an individual consistently
accuses others of to discover the true nature of that
individual. It is there that he paints his self portrait
and it is that part of himself that he most hates which he
projects onto others in the most hateful, repellent and
offensive ways.
Bob"

That really struck home, didn't it? Try this on, I've not
seen a better description of a primary component of your
pathology:

http://www.apa.org/journals/psp/psp7761121.html

It may come from spending too much time alone in the dark:

http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/sunshine.jpg

Or perhaps it is an incurable part of your makeup:

http://www.naturalchild.com/elliott_barker/prisons.html

But most likely it's a simple matter of:

http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/youare.swf


Peace,

Bob
--

"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no
simpler."

A. Einstein

Bob Cain wrote in message ...


Hmmm, this is a demonstration of sanity?

Since you seem to be an expert on the subject, you tell me.

It's probably prosecutable.

Probably not, but if you think so, please be my guest.


A few weeks in a detox might also be of some help.

Sorry to burst your bubble, but I'm not substance addicted. My sole
addiction is contempt for you, and for that there is no detox.


That is probably much better than waking up
in four point restraints wondering where you are and how you
got there.

I am sure that you speak from experience. Nonetheless, perhaps you
should be concerned with simply waking up.


Hey, if, after you get your feet back on the ground, you
need a sponser...



You label, discredit and condemn yourself by your own words, which I
quote verbatim as follows:

"Something I've found to be universal and almost always true
is that one must look at what an individual consistently
accuses others of to discover the true nature of that
individual. It is there that he paints his self portrait
and it is that part of himself that he most hates which he
projects onto others in the most hateful, repellent and
offensive ways.
Bob"

That really struck home, didn't it? Try this on, I've not
seen a better description of a primary component of your
pathology:

http://www.apa.org/journals/psp/psp7761121.html
It may come from spending too much time alone in the dark:
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/sunshine.jpg
Or perhaps it is an incurable part of your makeup:
http://www.naturalchild.com/elliott_barker/prisons.html
But most likely it's a simple matter of:
http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/youare.swf

Impressive! And, you qustion my sanity!


Peace,

Only in your dreams.

"The Ghost" wrote in message
. 29...

snip

In the distant past, you asked questions and I answered them. That was
before you started ****ing in my face.

Did it ever occur to you that he wouldn't be figuratively ****ing in
your face if you weren't figuratively on your knees right in front of him
begging for it?

Right now, I wouldn't give you the time of day if your pathetic existence
depended on it.

Considering what you've contributed in the recording groups so far, if
you did give him the time of day it would be the wrong time, and probably
the wrong day as well.

Call me whatever you wish, but know that in my opinion you are
demonstrably one of the
stupidest ****s I have encountered in any of the newsgroups, and that your
opinion of me, whatever it may be, is irrelevant and of no practical
consequence.

Then why are you wasting all this time posting your ridiculous insults
and pontifications?

"Bob Cain" wrote in message
...


The Ghost wrote:

Did you succeed, BTW, in screwing him over?

You bet. I persuaded the Almighty to deal with him appropriately.


http://www.geocitiehttp://www.lcanim...aro040606.html
http://www.lcanimal.org/event/event_034.htm

Keep that in mind, because now you are the one who is at the top of my
**** list.

Where is he now?

Exactly where he belongs and exactly where you are headed.

Hmmm, this is a demonstration of sanity? It's probably
prosecutable.

You had better get to some meetings, Gary, before the
wreckage gets completely out of hand. It's time to put the
plug in the jug again. A few weeks in a detox might also be
of some help. That is probably much better than waking up
in four point restraints wondering where you are and how you
got there.

Hey, if, after you get your feet back on the ground, you
need a sponser...


You label, discredit and condemn yourself by your own words, which I
quote verbatim as follows:

"Something I've found to be universal and almost always true
is that one must look at what an individual consistently
accuses others of to discover the true nature of that
individual. It is there that he paints his self portrait
and it is that part of himself that he most hates which he
projects onto others in the most hateful, repellent and
offensive ways.
Bob"

That really struck home, didn't it? Try this on, I've not
seen a better description of a primary component of your
pathology:

http://www.apa.org/journals/psp/psp7761121.html

It may come from spending too much time alone in the dark:

http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/sunshine.jpg

Or perhaps it is an incurable part of your makeup:

http://www.naturalchild.com/elliott_barker/prisons.html

But most likely it's a simple matter of:

http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/youare.swf


Peace,


Might as well put him on your "ignore" list Bob, he's so far gone that now
he's claiming a direct line to The Almighty. Next thing you know, he'll be
claiming to BE The Almighty! He threatened my life previously, and now he
taking responsibility for the death of another human being. Not only is he
insane, he might even be homocidal as well. I think it's time for formal
complaints to his ISP, I'm pretty sure death threats in public forums
qualify as ISP abuse. :-)

"Porky" wrote in message ...

Might as well put him on your "ignore" list Bob, he's so far gone that now
he's claiming a direct line to The Almighty. Next thing you know, he'll be
claiming to BE The Almighty! He threatened my life previously, and now he
taking responsibility for the death of another human being. Not only is he
insane, he might even be homocidal as well. I think it's time for formal
complaints to his ISP, I'm pretty sure death threats in public forums
qualify as ISP abuse. :-)

Be advised, dip****, that the isp complaint door swings both ways. So
before you dig yourself in over your head, and wind up with **** on
your face, I suggest that you get your facts straight, because it is
you, Bob Cain and Jim Carr who have been making the threats, not I.

"Porky" wrote in message ...
"The Ghost" wrote in message
. 29...

snip

In the distant past, you asked questions and I answered them. That was
before you started ****ing in my face.

Did it ever occur to you that he wouldn't be figuratively ****ing in
your face if you weren't figuratively on your knees right in front of him
begging for it?

Right now, I wouldn't give you the time of day if your pathetic existence
depended on it.

Considering what you've contributed in the recording groups so far, if
you did give him the time of day it would be the wrong time, and probably
the wrong day as well.

Call me whatever you wish, but know that in my opinion you are
demonstrably one of the
stupidest ****s I have encountered in any of the newsgroups, and that your
opinion of me, whatever it may be, is irrelevant and of no practical
consequence.

Then why are you wasting all this time posting your ridiculous insults
and pontifications?

For exactly the same reason that you are wasting your time posting
your ridiculous insults and pontifications.

"The Ghost" wrote in message
om...

Be advised, dip****, that the isp complaint door swings both ways. So
before you dig yourself in over your head, and wind up with **** on
your face, I suggest that you get your facts straight, because it is
you, Bob Cain and Jim Carr who have been making the threats, not I.

I haven't threatened you, but I certainly understand how you feel threatened
by me. It all falls back on your insecurity. You should explore it. You
should be asking yourself why you're obsessed with defecation (**** leaking
out ears, full of ****, **** on head) and penises (****ing on people, the
length of erect penises, pedophilia with boys). Freud would have a field day
with you. It's really a symptom of your obsession with order.

"The Ghost" wrote in message
om...
"Porky" wrote in message
...

Might as well put him on your "ignore" list Bob, he's so far gone that
now
he's claiming a direct line to The Almighty. Next thing you know, he'll
be
claiming to BE The Almighty! He threatened my life previously, and now
he
taking responsibility for the death of another human being. Not only is
he
insane, he might even be homocidal as well. I think it's time for
formal
complaints to his ISP, I'm pretty sure death threats in public forums
qualify as ISP abuse. :-)

Be advised, dip****, that the isp complaint door swings both ways. So
before you dig yourself in over your head, and wind up with **** on
your face, I suggest that you get your facts straight, because it is
you, Bob Cain and Jim Carr who have been making the threats, not I.

Be aware that you need valid evidence for your complaints, not something
taken out of context. We have it, you don't, end of discussion. Have a nice
day!

"The Ghost" wrote in message
om...
"Porky" wrote in message
...
"The Ghost" wrote in message
. 29...

snip

In the distant past, you asked questions and I answered them. That
was
before you started ****ing in my face.

Did it ever occur to you that he wouldn't be figuratively ****ing in
your face if you weren't figuratively on your knees right in front of
him
begging for it?

Right now, I wouldn't give you the time of day if your pathetic
existence
depended on it.

Considering what you've contributed in the recording groups so far,
if
you did give him the time of day it would be the wrong time, and
probably
the wrong day as well.

Call me whatever you wish, but know that in my opinion you are
demonstrably one of the
stupidest ****s I have encountered in any of the newsgroups, and that
your
opinion of me, whatever it may be, is irrelevant and of no practical
consequence.

Then why are you wasting all this time posting your ridiculous
insults
and pontifications?

For exactly the same reason that you are wasting your time posting
your ridiculous insults and pontifications.
Hey, I'm having fun with it. BTW, I didn't come over and **** in your
backyard, you came to ours (the recording groups). Go back to sci.physics
and you won't hear from me again. I cut sci.physics out ot the list whenever
I think about it.

"Porky" wrote in message ...
"The Ghost" wrote in message
om...
"Porky" wrote in message
...

Might as well put him on your "ignore" list Bob, he's so far gone that
now
he's claiming a direct line to The Almighty. Next thing you know, he'll
be
claiming to BE The Almighty! He threatened my life previously, and now
he
taking responsibility for the death of another human being. Not only is
he
insane, he might even be homocidal as well. I think it's time for
formal
complaints to his ISP, I'm pretty sure death threats in public forums
qualify as ISP abuse. :-)

Be advised, dip****, that the isp complaint door swings both ways. So
before you dig yourself in over your head, and wind up with **** on
your face, I suggest that you get your facts straight, because it is
you, Bob Cain and Jim Carr who have been making the threats, not I.

Be aware that you need valid evidence for your complaints, not something
taken out of context. We have it, you don't, end of discussion. Have a nice
day!

Your so-called "valid evidence" isn't worth squat, and you are no more
qualified to make assertions about what does/not constitute valid
evidence than you were to make assertions about the Doppler issue.
And, don't come back with your attorney friend says this/that bull
crap, because we both know that your attorney friend is a whore and
will tell you whatever you want to hear.

"Jim Carr" wrote in message news:yFmdd.32688$bk1.29452@fed1read05...
"The Ghost" wrote in message
om...

Be advised, dip****, that the isp complaint door swings both ways. So
before you dig yourself in over your head, and wind up with **** on
your face, I suggest that you get your facts straight, because it is
you, Bob Cain and Jim Carr who have been making the threats, not I.

I haven't threatened you, but I certainly understand how you feel threatened
by me. It all falls back on your insecurity. You should explore it. You
should be asking yourself why you're obsessed with defecation (**** leaking
out ears, full of ****, **** on head) and penises (****ing on people, the
length of erect penises, pedophilia with boys). Freud would have a field day
with you. It's really a symptom of your obsession with order.

Thank you, Dr. Lamebrain, for that cogent psychoanalysis. It is worth
just about what I paid for it. No doubt both you, porky the swine and
bob cain received your degrees in psychoanalysis from the same
mail-order university. Obsession is defined as a preoccupation with
an "unreasonable" idea or feeling. Since all of my assertions have
been reasonable, they fail the obsession test. The truth of the
matter is that you, porky the swine and bob cain are the ones who are
obsessed, and that your shared obsession is that the three of you
believe that you can discredit me with your false accusations and
personal insults. What you fail to realize is that the people I work
for and associate with share the same level of contempt that I do for
asswipes like
the three of you. Bottom line......your opinions of me are irrelevant
and what
the three of you scumbags say about me is of no practical consequence
whatsoever.

"The Ghost" wrote in message
om...

Thank you, Dr. Lamebrain, for that cogent psychoanalysis. It is worth
just about what I paid for it. No doubt both you, porky the swine and
bob cain received your degrees in psychoanalysis from the same
mail-order university.

It's same university that gave you a degree in English. If you're gonna
refer to "both" somethings you need two somethings, not three. Reread the
last sentence above. You *really* need to work on your insults. If they are
confusing to read, they aren't so funny.

Obsession is defined as a preoccupation with
an "unreasonable" idea or feeling.

Not quite. You're misquoting the second defintion. Obviously, the first
definition describes your behavior he "Compulsive preoccupation with a
fixed idea or an unwanted feeling or emotion, often accompanied by symptoms
of anxiety."

Since all of my assertions have
been reasonable, they fail the obsession test.

Reasonable? **** leaking out of my head is impossible. I've never threatened
you. You know nothing about my penis size. You know nothing about my
relationship with my ex-wife. Those certainly sound like unreasonable
assertations to me.

The truth of the
matter is that you, porky the swine and bob cain are the ones who are
obsessed, and that your shared obsession is that the three of you
believe that you can discredit me with your false accusations and
personal insults.

Quite the contrary, I'm trying to HELP you. How many times have I corrected
your spelling so you don't look foolish in front of others? How many times
have I suggested new insults when the old ones were worn out? How often did
I praise you for a good insult? How many times have I tried to assist you
with your obvious symptoms of mental illness?

I'm trying to be your *friend* not your enemy.

What you fail to realize is that the people I work
for and associate with share the same level of contempt that I do for
asswipes like
the three of you.

You mean those folks over at Anger Management, International?

Bottom line......your opinions of me are irrelevant
and what
the three of you scumbags say about me is of no practical consequence
whatsoever.

You seem to spend an awful lot of time on people who don't matter.

"The Ghost" wrote in message
om...
"Porky" wrote in message
...
"The Ghost" wrote in message
om...
"Porky" wrote in message
...

Might as well put him on your "ignore" list Bob, he's so far gone
that
now
he's claiming a direct line to The Almighty. Next thing you know,
he'll
be
claiming to BE The Almighty! He threatened my life previously, and
now
he
taking responsibility for the death of another human being. Not only
is
he
insane, he might even be homocidal as well. I think it's time for
formal
complaints to his ISP, I'm pretty sure death threats in public
forums
qualify as ISP abuse. :-)

Be advised, dip****, that the isp complaint door swings both ways. So
before you dig yourself in over your head, and wind up with **** on
your face, I suggest that you get your facts straight, because it is
you, Bob Cain and Jim Carr who have been making the threats, not I.

Be aware that you need valid evidence for your complaints, not
something
taken out of context. We have it, you don't, end of discussion. Have a
nice
day!

Your so-called "valid evidence" isn't worth squat, and you are no more
qualified to make assertions about what does/not constitute valid
evidence than you were to make assertions about the Doppler issue.
And, don't come back with your attorney friend says this/that bull
crap, because we both know that your attorney friend is a whore and
will tell you whatever you want to hear.

Since you don't know my attorney friend, you have no idea as to what he is
or isn't, other than that he is an attorney. After reading some of your
posts, my attorney friend pointed them out to a psychiatrist friend of his,
who is of the opinion that you may have issues stemming from a major
insecurity problem or perhaps from an inferiority complex. He says that if
these issues extend into your everyday life, you should seek professional
help.
While your name might be Gary Sokolich, I rather doubt that you are the
Dr. Gary Sokolich who co-wrote the AES paper "Spectral Contamination
Measurement" with Deane Jensen. If you are that Gary Sokolich, it would
appear that the intervening years between the time that paper was written
and the present have not been kind to you. Alzheimer's is an insidious
condition, and perhaps we should take that into consideration before
replying to your pitiful attempts at proving yourself still competent.

"Jim Carr" wrote in message news:Chked.37619$bk1.12110@fed1read05...


It's same university that gave you a degree in English.

When did I ever claim to have a degree in English.

Reasonable? **** leaking out of my head is impossible. I've never threatened
you. You know nothing about my penis size. You know nothing about my
relationship with my ex-wife. Those certainly sound like unreasonable
assertations to me.

How they sound to you is irrelevant, and whether or not they are
unreasonable is a matter that is yet to be resolved. The fact of the
matter is that it is you, not I who has an admitted failed marriage.
There is a reason for that and I doubt that you could convince anyone
that you had no responsibility for the outcome. I have little doubt
that you treated your ex-wife with the same level of arrogance an
disrespect that you have manifested here.


The truth of the
matter is that you, porky the swine and bob cain are the ones who are
obsessed, and that your shared obsession is that the three of you
believe that you can discredit me with your false accusations and
personal insults.

Quite the contrary, I'm trying to HELP you. How many times have I corrected
your spelling so you don't look foolish in front of others?

No one of substance is concerned in the least with my trivial spelling
errors.

How many times
have I suggested new insults when the old ones were worn out? How often did
I praise you for a good insult? How many times have I tried to assist you
with your obvious symptoms of mental illness? I'm trying to be your
friend* not your enemy.

Anyone having friends like you doesn't need enemies. You are clearly
one sick and pathetic ****.


You seem to spend an awful lot of time on people who don't matter.

After the horses have gone by, someone has to clean up their ****.

"Porky" wrote in message t...

Since you don't know my attorney friend, you have no idea as to what he is
or isn't, other than that he is an attorney. After reading some of your
posts, my attorney friend pointed them out to a psychiatrist friend of his,
who is of the opinion that you may have issues stemming from a major
insecurity problem or perhaps from an inferiority complex. He says that if
these issues extend into your everyday life, you should seek professional
help.

And I say that he is, like you, full of ****.

While your name might be Gary Sokolich, I rather doubt that you are the
Dr. Gary Sokolich who co-wrote the AES paper "Spectral Contamination
Measurement" with Deane Jensen. If you are that Gary Sokolich, it would
appear that the intervening years between the time that paper was written
and the present have not been kind to you. Alzheimer's is an insidious
condition, and perhaps we should take that into consideration before
replying to your pitiful attempts at proving yourself still competent.

Presumably you have medical proof of your slanderous accusation. If
not, I suggest that you consult with your whore attorney for some
serious legal advice.

"Porky" wrote in message ...

I've been out of the "equipment repair" business for years except for
the occasional favor for a friend and for some specialty equipment whose
owners pay dearly for the service. I've been in business for myself for
quite a while, and I do mostly design, not repair.

More power to you. Presumably your customers are unaware of the
mindlessness and gross technical incompetence that is reflected in
your posts to the audio newsgroups.


What's your excuse for living on the reputation of having one AES paper
published in 1988? That's the only credential I can find on the web for you,
other than numerous instances of insult trading and a couple of quotes about
not knowing what to do with a third octave analyzer and something about why
we hear "the sea" in a seashell.

I am paid for and judged by what I do, not by what I have published or
what some mindless jackass like yourself is able to find on the
internet. I'm not out to impress anyone, especially
tehniclaly-challenged scumbags like you. But, if it really matters to
you, do a patent search on me, and then provide a list of your
patents.

"The Ghost" wrote in message
m...
"Porky" wrote in message
t...

Since you don't know my attorney friend, you have no idea as to what
he is
or isn't, other than that he is an attorney. After reading some of your
posts, my attorney friend pointed them out to a psychiatrist friend of
his,
who is of the opinion that you may have issues stemming from a major
insecurity problem or perhaps from an inferiority complex. He says that
if
these issues extend into your everyday life, you should seek
professional
help.

And I say that he is, like you, full of ****.

While your name might be Gary Sokolich, I rather doubt that you are
the
Dr. Gary Sokolich who co-wrote the AES paper "Spectral Contamination
Measurement" with Deane Jensen. If you are that Gary Sokolich, it would
appear that the intervening years between the time that paper was
written
and the present have not been kind to you. Alzheimer's is an insidious
condition, and perhaps we should take that into consideration before
replying to your pitiful attempts at proving yourself still competent.

Presumably you have medical proof of your slanderous accusation. If
not, I suggest that you consult with your whore attorney for some
serious legal advice.

You certainly know little about the law, especially those governing libel
and slander. By prefacing my comments with "it would appear...", I made it
clear that I was expressing a view or opinion, something perfectly legal and
protected by my first amendment rights. I have no need of legal advice
concerning the likes of you.
BTW, I still don't know if your real name is Gary Sokolich, or if so, if
you are the co-author of the AES paper I mentioned in my previous post to
you. So, not knowing your identity, how can I slander you?

"The Ghost" wrote in message
om...
You seem to spend an awful lot of time on people who don't matter.

After the horses have gone by, someone has to clean up their ****.

There you go again with the obsession with feces.

"The Ghost" wrote in message
om...
"Porky" wrote in message
...

I've been out of the "equipment repair" business for years except for
the occasional favor for a friend and for some specialty equipment whose
owners pay dearly for the service. I've been in business for myself for
quite a while, and I do mostly design, not repair.

More power to you. Presumably your customers are unaware of the
mindlessness and gross technical incompetence that is reflected in
your posts to the audio newsgroups.

I get no complaints on my work, and at least I do know how to use a third
octave band audio analyzer, which puts me a step above you.

What's your excuse for living on the reputation of having one AES
paper
published in 1988? That's the only credential I can find on the web for
you,
other than numerous instances of insult trading and a couple of quotes
about
not knowing what to do with a third octave analyzer and something about
why
we hear "the sea" in a seashell.

I am paid for and judged by what I do, not by what I have published or
what some mindless jackass like yourself is able to find on the
internet. I'm not out to impress anyone, especially
tehniclaly-challenged scumbags like you. But, if it really matters to
you, do a patent search on me, and then provide a list of your
patents.

Why should you expect me to have to do a patent search on you, and expect
me to list my patents for you? If you want to know about my patents, do your
own search.
I found three patents for a Gary Sokolich from Newport Beach, Ca, one for
an implantable mic assembly (#6,736,771), one for a behind the ear mic sub
assembly (#6,505,076) and one for "omnidirectional audio in a
communications device" (#5,909,490). Of course Gary Sokolich was only a
co-inventor on all three, and we still don't know if you're that Gary
Sokolich, or even if that is your name. Most folks who are entitled to put
"Dr." in front of their names have a much better command of the English
language than you seem to have.
If you want to know about my patents, do a search like I did, just be sure
you spell my name correctly.

Porky wrote:


I get no complaints on my work, and at least I do know how to use a third
octave band audio analyzer, which puts me a step above you.

Now, now, Mike. After all, Gary did give us _Spectral
Contamination_...hahahahahaha...HAHAHAHAHA....whew ! But
then, that was written for people of consequence so it's
little wonder it remains obscure (make that trivial).


Bob
--

"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no
simpler."

A. Einstein

"Bob Cain" wrote in message
...


Porky wrote:


I get no complaints on my work, and at least I do know how to use a
third
octave band audio analyzer, which puts me a step above you.

Now, now, Mike. After all, Gary did give us _Spectral
Contamination_...hahahahahaha...HAHAHAHAHA....whew ! But
then, that was written for people of consequence so it's
little wonder it remains obscure (make that trivial).


Wouldn't spectral contamination also be crap coming from a spectre, and
isn't a ghost a spectre? It then logically follows that everything Gary has
posted here would be in the nature of spectral contamination, wouldn't it.
*ROFLMAO*

Bob Cain wrote in message ...
Porky wrote:


I get no complaints on my work, and at least I do know how to use a third
octave band audio analyzer, which puts me a step above you.

Now, now, Mike. After all, Gary did give us _Spectral
Contamination_...hahahahahaha...HAHAHAHAHA....whew ! But
then, that was written for people of consequence so it's
little wonder it remains obscure (make that trivial).
Bob

Pray tell, scumbag, what exactly are you known for other than gross
technical incompetence and your recently-disclosed inability to solve
a simple partial differential equation that is discussed in virtually
every introductory textbook on acoustics?

"Jim Carr" wrote in message news:fX%ed.43690$bk1.26179@fed1read05...
"The Ghost" wrote in message
om...
You seem to spend an awful lot of time on people who don't matter.

After the horses have gone by, someone has to clean up their ****.

There you go again with the obsession with feces.

A statement of reality hardly qualifies as an obsession.

Assuming that your wife left you because you treated her like a piece
of **** and beccause you couldn't satisfy her sexually, please tell me
that you didn't breed.

The Ghost wrote:


Pray tell, scumbag, what exactly are you known for other than gross
technical incompetence and your recently-disclosed inability to solve
a simple partial differential equation that is discussed in virtually
every introductory textbook on acoustics?

http://www.apa.org/journals/psp/psp7761121.html


--

"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no
simpler."

A. Einstein

Bob Cain wrote in message ...

http://www.apa.org/journals/psp/psp7761121.html

From article linked above:

"As Miller (1993) perceptively observed in the quote that opens this
article, and as Charles Darwin (1871) sagely noted over a century ago,
"ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge" (p.
3)".

George W. Bush anyone?

Bob Cain wrote in message ...
The Ghost wrote:


Pray tell, scumbag, what exactly are you known for other than gross
technical incompetence and your recently-disclosed inability to solve
a simple partial differential equation that is discussed in virtually
every introductory textbook on acoustics?

http://www.apa.org/journals/psp/psp7761121.html

Great find. It describes you perfectly. Unfortunately, should you ever come
to recognize and accept your technical incompetence, you will still be
technically incompetent.

"Porky" wrote in message ...


Actually I don't use my real name on usenet because of nuts like you.

The reason you don't use your real name on usenet is because you want
to be in a position to be able make slanderous accusations against
others without incurring the legal consequences. In other words, you
don't use your real name because you are a cowardly piece of toilet
scum.


Since you've already threatened my life,

That's an outright slanderous lie. I have made no such threats.

and taken credit for the death of another person,

Another outright slanderous lie, and an absurd one at that.

I think I'll refrain, thanks anyway. BTW, why do you use a
pseudonym?

To keep asswipes like you guessing.

This never was about my credentials,
since I never claimed expertise in any of this.
You were the one who claimed to be an expert,

That I did. And since you repeatedly claimed that I didn't know what
I was talking about, you implicitly assumed a superior level of
expertise, and in doing so made it entirely about your credentials or
lack thereof.


and you still
haven't posted any credentials, you haven't even stated that your name is
Gary Sokolich and if so, whether you are the Gary Sokolich who holds the
patents I mentioned. How about it Mr Ghost?

Hey, you're the wise-ass "know it all." Figure it out for yourself.

"The Ghost" wrote in message
m...

To keep asswipes like you guessing.

Again, the obsession with feces and defecation. What's up with you?