Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
test to make a link, ignore.
abra cadabra.
|
#2
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
test to make a link, ignore.
On Apr 30, 5:58 am, Patrick Turner wrote:
abra cadabra. Patrick, I'll take this opportunity to ask you a question... if I may. I find myself with a couple of Hammond 1650F OPT's to hand. My plan was to build a couple of p-p EL34 amplifiers (monoblocs or same chassis), likely next year when I retire. The OPT's are 7.6K p-p. Do you have a preferred operating point for the o/p tubes so that this impedance is roughly right for around 20 watts per channel? My reference design will be the Mullard 5-20 for old times sake (I built two 5-10's in the 1960's.) I do not have a B+ p/s designed yet (It depends a lot on what I have in the way of power transformers lying around), so I'm not sure how much headroom there is for cathode bias, per the original 5-20. Thanks, very best, and cheers, Roger |
#3
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
test to make a point about ancient old Mullard 520 amp designs, nota link, so don't ignore.
Engineer wrote: On Apr 30, 5:58 am, Patrick Turner wrote: abra cadabra. Patrick, I'll take this opportunity to ask you a question... if I may. Just imagine the silent boredom of a world without questions..... I find myself with a couple of Hammond 1650F OPT's to hand. My plan was to build a couple of p-p EL34 amplifiers (monoblocs or same chassis), likely next year when I retire. The OPT's are 7.6K p-p. Do you have a preferred operating point for the o/p tubes so that this impedance is roughly right for around 20 watts per channel? If you only want 20 watts, then they should nearly be all class A and cathode bias with Ea = 375V, Ia = 60mA. My reference design will be the Mullard 5-20 for old times sake (I built two 5-10's in the 1960's.) I do not have a B+ p/s designed yet (It depends a lot on what I have in the way of power transformers lying around), so I'm not sure how much headroom there is for cathode bias, per the original 5-20. For class A UL, and Ea at 375V, you'l need about 30V for cathode bias, so you need about 410V at the CT of the OPT. The minimum unloaded ac voltage needed for this is about 320Vrms, and silicon diodes will give a working 432V at the output of a cap input filter. If a tube rectifier is used the acV needs to be much higher, probably about 360Vac, but anything up to 400V is easily used and a series resistor can limit the B+ which won't need regulation because class A circuits have little B+ current input variation with music signals. The Mullard 520 was a poor man's hi-fi solution. EF86 and 12AX7 belong in preamps. The Mullard suited low source input signals of the 1960s, but now we have cd signals far higher so "reference" what you build to ancient history of 1960? I would never just do what i did back then, or wanted to do, but couldn't. I'd aim a bit higher. With very little extra effort, you could build the power amp section of the integrated amp shown at http://www.turneraudio.com.au/5050Integrated.html Scroll down 25% to the schematic. And all of what i said above about biasing can be addopted with KT88 if you wish; these tubes will do slightly better than EL34, and if switched to triode will perform to give more triode power than EL34. I recommend the paralleled twin triodes for each half of the LTP it makes the amp more dynamic and "alive" sounding. If you have not got enough HT voltage on a PAIR of trannies lying around for monoblocs, maybe you have to buy trannies, or if you have one big one then consider the stereo two channel chassis, or one PS chassis feeding the two audio channels in a second chassis. I have a couple of ancient trannies with quite high HT meant probably for some amateur radio transmitter; I bought them from a ham who retired to a coastal town. Maybe I wind a choke and make a choke input filter one day. But one day will never come, there are too many customers hammering at my door. Patrick Turner. Thanks, very best, and cheers, Roger |
#4
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
test to make a point about ancient old Mullard 520 amp designs, not a link, so don't ignore.
On Apr 30, 11:06 pm, Patrick Turner wrote:
Engineer wrote: On Apr 30, 5:58 am, Patrick Turner wrote: abra cadabra. Patrick, I'll take this opportunity to ask you a question... if I may. Just imagine the silent boredom of a world without questions..... (snip) But one day will never come, there are too many customers hammering at my door. Patrick Turner. Thanks, very best, and cheers, Roger- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Patrick, many thanks. I've saved all this to ripen for a while... Will likely build in 2008. Cheers, Roger |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Just a test. Either ignore or make jokes! ;-) | Pro Audio | |||
test: ignore | Car Audio | |||
test - ignore | Pro Audio | |||
Test - Sorry - please ignore | Pro Audio | |||
test please ignore | Audio Opinions |