Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Audio Critic
Did the Audio Critic go belly up? Been a while since I've received an issue.
- GRL |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
GRL wrote:
Did the Audio Critic go belly up? Been a while since I've received an issue. - GRL That's the way it is supposed to be. They are just sticking to their usual publishing schedule. It's the Paul Masson-Citizen Kane school of reviewing--they release nothing "before its time". Of course, unlike that drink of fat, overweight directors living on laurels, TAC is, IMO, worth the wait. But it's kinda like beer. Some folks are happy drinking a case of Miller Lite every weekend. Some folks, on the other hand, would rather sip a pint of Sam Adams Chocolate Christmas Bock once a year. I guess it all depends on one's priorities. michael try: http://theaudiocritic.com/ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
michael wrote:
try: http://theaudiocritic.com/ Well, will ya look at that! At least it's a sign of life. The latest issue I have on my shelf is #29, dated Summer/Fall 2003, which means they are now well behind even their usual one-a-year schedule. Anyone who's not familiar with TAC should consider the back-issue offer. (Don't subscribe till you hear there's a new issue out, tho.) The equipment reviews will be of mostly historical interest, but there's plenty of meat, some good interviews with respectable people in the biz, and a fair bit of flame-throwing. Even if you're a hard-core subjectivist, you should check it out (for the same reason that liberals ought to listen to Rush every once in a while). bob |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On 1/1/05 12:19 PM, in article ,
" wrote: michael wrote: try: http://theaudiocritic.com/ Well, will ya look at that! At least it's a sign of life. The latest issue I have on my shelf is #29, dated Summer/Fall 2003, which means they are now well behind even their usual one-a-year schedule. I have that issue - it is a pretty good issue, too Anyone who's not familiar with TAC should consider the back-issue offer. (Don't subscribe till you hear there's a new issue out, tho.) The equipment reviews will be of mostly historical interest, but there's plenty of meat, some good interviews with respectable people in the biz, and a fair bit of flame-throwing. Even if you're a hard-core subjectivist, you should check it out (for the same reason that liberals ought to listen to Rush every once in a while). Did not strike me as being super hard core objectivist, though, I am a subjectivist when it comes to this hobby, and I found nothing objectionable in the magazine - even the editorial flames weren't terribly bad. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
B&D wrote:
On 1/1/05 12:19 PM, in article , " wrote: michael wrote: try: http://theaudiocritic.com/ Well, will ya look at that! At least it's a sign of life. The latest issue I have on my shelf is #29, dated Summer/Fall 2003, which means they are now well behind even their usual one-a-year schedule. I have that issue - it is a pretty good issue, too Anyone who's not familiar with TAC should consider the back-issue offer. (Don't subscribe till you hear there's a new issue out, tho.) The equipment reviews will be of mostly historical interest, but there's plenty of meat, some good interviews with respectable people in the biz, and a fair bit of flame-throwing. Even if you're a hard-core subjectivist, you should check it out (for the same reason that liberals ought to listen to Rush every once in a while). Did not strike me as being super hard core objectivist, though, I am a subjectivist when it comes to this hobby, and I found nothing objectionable in the magazine - even the editorial flames weren't terribly bad. Senor Aczel has been getting soft in his old age--or maybe that was Ivan Berger's price for participation. For an example of the classic TAC tack, download "10 Biggest Lies" he http://www.theaudiocritic.com/cwo/Sample_Articles/ bob |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
wrote: Senor Aczel has been getting soft in his old age--or maybe that was Ivan Berger's price for participation. For an example of the classic TAC tack, download "10 Biggest Lies" he http://www.theaudiocritic.com/cwo/Sample_Articles/ That was refreshing, even if you don't like the content. Aczel can write. Compare the above to some of Randi's drivel for example. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
common mode rejection vs. crosstalk | Pro Audio | |||
Topic Police | Pro Audio |