[[email protected]]

On Saturday, April 5, 1997 at 1:00:00 AM UTC-7, Bill Jones wrote:
Hello All,

Does anyone know how they got that incredible flange on "Listen to the
Music"?

Also, who recorded it and where?

Thanks in advance...

Bill Jones

[John Williamson]

On 12/10/2016 01:21, wrote:
On Saturday, April 5, 1997 at 1:00:00 AM UTC-7, Bill Jones wrote:
Hello All,

Does anyone know how they got that incredible flange on "Listen to the
Music"?

Almost certainly by using a couple of tape recorders. Start 2 copies
running in sync and gently slow one down by touching the feed reel
flange lightly.

The first commercially available bucket brigade phaser wasn't available
at the time of the recording, though a prototype had been built in the
late 1960s.

Also, who recorded it and where?

Wikilies says recorded in 1972 at Warner Brothers Studios, North
Hollywood as one of the tracks for the Toulouse Street album. I can find
no reference to the engineering staff names.

--
Tciao for Now!

John.

[david gourley[_2_]]

John Williamson said...news:e66f91Fjc4fU1
@mid.individual.net:

On 12/10/2016 01:21, wrote:
On Saturday, April 5, 1997 at 1:00:00 AM UTC-7, Bill Jones wrote:
Hello All,

Does anyone know how they got that incredible flange on "Listen to the
Music"?

Almost certainly by using a couple of tape recorders. Start 2 copies
running in sync and gently slow one down by touching the feed reel
flange lightly.

The first commercially available bucket brigade phaser wasn't available
at the time of the recording, though a prototype had been built in the
late 1960s.

Also, who recorded it and where?

Wikilies says recorded in 1972 at Warner Brothers Studios, North
Hollywood as one of the tracks for the Toulouse Street album. I can find
no reference to the engineering staff names.


Ted Templeman produced, Steve Barncard, Don Landee, and Marty Cohn are
credited with engineering. Barncard & Cohn are also listed as co-
producers.

david

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[JackA]

Neat stuff! Doobies had to be remixed for CD too rich in higher frequencies. Neat topic from 1997!
Jack

[Scott Dorsey]

In article ,
John Williamson wrote:
On 12/10/2016 01:21, wrote:
On Saturday, April 5, 1997 at 1:00:00 AM UTC-7, Bill Jones wrote:
Hello All,

Does anyone know how they got that incredible flange on "Listen to the
Music"?

Almost certainly by using a couple of tape recorders. Start 2 copies
running in sync and gently slow one down by touching the feed reel
flange lightly.

You guys are replying to a post that is 19 years old.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

[Mike Rivers[_2_]]

On 10/12/2016 10:57 AM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
You guys are replying to a post that is 19 years old.

Well, the record in question must be 30 years old.

--

For a good time, call http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com

[JackA]

On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 at 11:36:43 AM UTC-4, Mike Rivers wrote:
On 10/12/2016 10:57 AM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
You guys are replying to a post that is 19 years old.

Well, the record in question must be 30 years old.

Neat Topics they had back then!! What happened!?

About the time of The Doobies...

Did I tell you, right here in usenet a "Roadie" told me Columbia used/hired him for doing audio. That must of been when Columbia Records began to fail, they'd use anyone who was interested. No "engineer" qualities necessary!! The one song in question was Chase's - Get It On!!

Jack


--

For a good time, call http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com

[[email protected]]

Scott Dorsey wrote: "You guys are replying to a post that is 19 years old"

So.


Freakin...


WHAT?!?!

[JackA]

On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 at 6:04:28 PM UTC-4, wrote:
Scott Dorsey wrote: "You guys are replying to a post that is 19 years old"

So.


Freakin...


WHAT?!?!

:-)

Jack

[None]

thekkhhmaah @ tardsRus . com wrote in message
...
Scott Dorsey wrote: "You guys are replying to a post that is 19
years old"
So.
Freakin...
WHAT?!?!

Uh oh. I think the retard had a bad day today. Maybe he needs a fresh
diaper and a nap.

[[email protected]]

Butt.


Out.


You wouldn't know a good thread if it ran
through a SEWING MACHINE.

[None]

thick-mama @ TheRetardStore . com wrote in message
...
Butt.
Out.

If your butt is out, maybe you should pull your li'l shorts back up.
You should be embarrassed. Look at his li'l shorts; you can see al the
way to Argentina!

In case you forgot, you don't get to tell anyone what to post here.

You wouldn't know a good thread if it ran
through a SEWING MACHINE.

On the short bus, that might pass for humor. But they wouldn't be
laughing with you; they'd be laughing at you. Now put your hockey
helmet back up and pull up your shorts. Bad retard! Bad!

[John Williamson]

On 12/10/2016 15:57, Scott Dorsey wrote:
In article ,
John Williamson wrote:
On 12/10/2016 01:21, wrote:
On Saturday, April 5, 1997 at 1:00:00 AM UTC-7, Bill Jones wrote:
Hello All,

Does anyone know how they got that incredible flange on "Listen to the
Music"?

Almost certainly by using a couple of tape recorders. Start 2 copies
running in sync and gently slow one down by touching the feed reel
flange lightly.

You guys are replying to a post that is 19 years old.
--scott

The timestamp in the header here is for 01:21 on the day I saw it. The
1997 reference is in the post. It seems that Google has barfed yet again.

--
Tciao for Now!

John.

[JackA]

On Thursday, October 13, 2016 at 1:21:53 AM UTC-4, John Williamson wrote:
On 12/10/2016 15:57, Scott Dorsey wrote:
In article ,
John Williamson wrote:
On 12/10/2016 01:21, wrote:
On Saturday, April 5, 1997 at 1:00:00 AM UTC-7, Bill Jones wrote:
Hello All,

Does anyone know how they got that incredible flange on "Listen to the
Music"?

Almost certainly by using a couple of tape recorders. Start 2 copies
running in sync and gently slow one down by touching the feed reel
flange lightly.

You guys are replying to a post that is 19 years old.
--scott

The timestamp in the header here is for 01:21 on the day I saw it. The
1997 reference is in the post. It seems that Google has barfed yet again.

I initially replied from a cell phone, but I saw 1997 outside the body of the post. Either way, interesting subject!!

Jack


--
Tciao for Now!

John.

[Scott Dorsey]

John Williamson wrote:
On 12/10/2016 15:57, Scott Dorsey wrote:
In article ,
John Williamson wrote:
On 12/10/2016 01:21, wrote:
On Saturday, April 5, 1997 at 1:00:00 AM UTC-7, Bill Jones wrote:
Hello All,

Does anyone know how they got that incredible flange on "Listen to the
Music"?

Almost certainly by using a couple of tape recorders. Start 2 copies
running in sync and gently slow one down by touching the feed reel
flange lightly.

You guys are replying to a post that is 19 years old.

The timestamp in the header here is for 01:21 on the day I saw it. The
1997 reference is in the post. It seems that Google has barfed yet again.

Right. What happened is that someone replied to a 1997 post without adding
any additional text. Then you replied to that.
--scott


--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

[John Williamson]

On 13/10/2016 14:26, Scott Dorsey wrote:
John Williamson wrote:
On 12/10/2016 15:57, Scott Dorsey wrote:

You guys are replying to a post that is 19 years old.

The timestamp in the header here is for 01:21 on the day I saw it. The
1997 reference is in the post. It seems that Google has barfed yet again.

Right. What happened is that someone replied to a 1997 post without adding
any additional text. Then you replied to that.
--scott


Yup. I have a bad habit of just reading the post time to judge whether
to respond or not.

--
Tciao for Now!

John.

[JackA]

On Thursday, October 13, 2016 at 10:30:49 AM UTC-4, John Williamson wrote:
On 13/10/2016 14:26, Scott Dorsey wrote:
John Williamson wrote:
On 12/10/2016 15:57, Scott Dorsey wrote:

You guys are replying to a post that is 19 years old.

The timestamp in the header here is for 01:21 on the day I saw it. The
1997 reference is in the post. It seems that Google has barfed yet again.

Right. What happened is that someone replied to a 1997 post without adding
any additional text. Then you replied to that.
--scott


Yup. I have a bad habit of just reading the post time to judge whether
to respond or not.

We forgive usenet newbies! :-)

Jack


--
Tciao for Now!

John.