Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Better bandwidth than USB-2?
I have a PreSonus Studio 1810. For $100 more, I
could have it's descendant, the 1810c, which, apart from a couple of tweaks to the software, seems only to sport the new USB type. In this case, I assume that the underlying communication with the computer is the same, only over a USB-C connection. In other words, would it be safe to say that latency would be the same on either unit, even though USB 3.0 or C is theoretically capable of greater throughput which should result in less usable latency? I mean, did they just put a different plug on the same unit? And why the apparent lack of USB3.0 devices? Wouldn't it be a dream to have the extra bandwidth? I look at the prices once in a while, and it seems as though anything beyond USB2.0, (Thunderbolt, PCI etc.) runs into the stratosphere pricewise. So for the hobby user, should I be content with USB2.0 for now or are there other budget avenues to choose regarding increased throughput? Thanks, Tobiah |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Limited Bandwidth | Vacuum Tubes | |||
Sound cards real bandwidth | Tech | |||
Bandwidth and Frequency response | High End Audio | |||
Constant bandwidth TRF circuit | Vacuum Tubes | |||
Who hogs bandwidth on RAT? | Vacuum Tubes |