Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Amps, more argument!
I would have to say that is boost the high, just for the simple reason
that this amp is more high end'ish then anyof the 6 amps that I have sitting here. So the new amp isn't providing a flat response? I'd have it checked out. The amp works fine. If it's not providing a flat frequency response then it's not performing to spec. There are too many variables to be able to say for certain. That's why in order to answer this question it's important to isolate variables so you can come to a logically sound conclusion. You didn't isolate the important variables, such as power, linearity, and listener bias. Never the less, there is a difference. Dunno what but there is one. Apparently so. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Amps, more argument!
Where you have the gain set has nothing to do with whether or not you're A)
abusing it, or B) overdriving it. Half gain may be WELL into clipping depending on the output voltage of your HU, which can, over time, hurt your amp. Just because your Solo lasted (my last one didn't, but I still like them) doesn't mean squat about how you were treating your amp. You still seemed to miss the part about Sony and Kicker being different companies. If you can't get that straight it doesn't surprise me that you can't figure out how YOU destroyed your amp. Paul Vina "Chuck" wrote in message ... well i didn't kill them they committed suicide..the circuit protections didn't work...(ah..the little red light didn't come on.. lol) Abuse?..Oh you mean turning my amp up half way? I don't think so. You see I think the amps didn't have enuff power and that made them work too hard. 100x4 is what everyone argued me to get ..i said more watt per channel .and should have listened to myself i guess . You see i have a solo baric and i turned it up all the way for eight years ..eh guess what it still works fine. I bet i do find a amp thats worthy. Thanks anyway |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Amps, more argument!
Just bcuz you may be a caraudio bookworm doesn't mean that people just
starting are idiots. Idiot, in and of itself, is not a derogatory term. It simply means uneducated. BTW, you ned to start quoting. Paul Vina |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Amps, more argument!
Wow. Getting on someone for belittling someone by doing it yourself.
That's funny. Paul Vina "Captain Howdy" wrote in message ... Thats right, set the soundgeek str8. The little prick jerkskin of a bas-turd that he is. LOL In article , Will_Skillz wrote: Hold up Soundfreak, you need to calm down with all that belittling stuff. Just bcuz you may be a caraudio bookworm doesn't mean that people just starting are idiots. So I don't know alot about scientific stuff, big deal bit(h. Though I still don't agree with the others that are posting here, and they still don't agree with me, we all, well almost all, are still respecting each other. So keep that childish $hit to yourself. Better yet, don't respond to anything I post. There is no room for "I am greater than thou" attitudes. I don't mind debates, bcuz some are fruitful. But the deragatory BS your talking doesn't help a damn thing. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Amps, more argument!
Hold up Soundfreak,
you need to calm down with all that belittling stuff. It is not belittling, it is just posting the obvious. Just bcuz you may be a caraudio bookworm doesn't mean that people just starting are idiots. No, only the ones who refuse to realize that they do not know what is going on and keep arguing against the facts, like howdy and pugsly. And those who will not answer simple questions that would help them understand and keep the discussion moving foward. You fit both of those. So I don't know alot about scientific stuff, big deal bit(h. Well, when you are attempting to argue about the scientific and technical stuff it is a big deal. Though I still don't agree with the others that are posting here, and they still don't agree with me, we all, well almost all, are still respecting each other. So keep that childish $hit to yourself. So I provide reasoning and show you the way it really is repeatedly and that makes me childish? I attempted to explain to you that I do not doubt you heard a difference, but what you attributed it too was wrong. You still, without any proof or logic, continued to argue. Well, I do not have time for that so I classified you into the only 2 catergories I saw. You are the one who chose to see yourself as the idiot. I don't mind debates, bcuz some are fruitful. But the deragatory BS your talking doesn't help a damn thing. You never brought any information to debate with!!!! I even gave you questions for you to answer to continue the discussion, but you refused to even acknowledge them. I have no problem debating with people, but when they have little knowledge of the topic and no desire to learn about it, then the debate is impossible. If you want to actually discuss the matter then answer the questions I have already asked, but once you answer those you will probably see the flaws in your logic. Les |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Amps, more argument!
Thats right, set the soundgeek str8. The little prick jerkskin of a bas-turd
that he is. LOL Still desperate for anyone to agree with you? You, like Will, have never provided any sort of proof or logic to support your argument, yet you still rally around it. It is sad. Les |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Amps, more argument!
Captain Howdy wrote:
Never the less, there is a difference. Dunno what but there is one. you'd have a rough idea if you comprehended what you've been reading... assuming that you've been reading the posts you reply to... -- sancho |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Amps, more argument!
The gain level should be set relative to your HU's line output. By saying
that the amps didn't have enough power are you therefore saying you cranked it up beyond their ability? If so, I'm sure the amps were being pushed into clipping delivering distorted sound and thereby generating unneccessary heat. Heat destroys semiconductors, regardless of the circuit protection schemes used (they are usually last ditch efforts to try and save the system, some are better than others at stopping premature failures). Clipping causes the amp to draw more current then necessary causing the power supply to work beyond its means and all in all generating more heat. In any case the user should be operating the amp within its bounds and not overly rely on the circuit protections. It has nothing to do with the amps but more so in how you intended to use them. It is an inaccurate statement then to say that Kicker made crappy amps but a more accurate statement would be that your demands were not met by those Kicker amps. And how and where does Sony fit into this picture? "Chuck" wrote in message ... well i didn't kill them they committed suicide..the circuit protections didn't work...(ah..the little red light didn't come on.. lol) Abuse?..Oh you mean turning my amp up half way? I don't think so. You see I think the amps didn't have enuff power and that made them work too hard. 100x4 is what everyone argued me to get ..i said more watt per channel ..and should have listened to myself i guess . You see i have a solo baric and i turned it up all the way for eight years ..eh guess what it still works fine. I bet i do find a amp thats worthy. Thanks anyway --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.564 / Virus Database: 356 - Release Date: 1/19/2004 |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Amps, more argument!
No idea, it isn't due to power output. Is there something that i have missed? In article , sancho wrote: Captain Howdy wrote: Never the less, there is a difference. Dunno what but there is one. you'd have a rough idea if you comprehended what you've been reading... assuming that you've been reading the posts you reply to... |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Amps, more argument!
You like that huh?
In article x%gUb.176786$sv6.934638@attbi_s52, "Paul Vina" wrote: Wow. Getting on someone for belittling someone by doing it yourself. That's funny. Paul Vina "Captain Howdy" wrote in message ... Thats right, set the soundgeek str8. The little prick jerkskin of a bas-turd that he is. LOL In article , Will_Skillz wrote: Hold up Soundfreak, you need to calm down with all that belittling stuff. Just bcuz you may be a caraudio bookworm doesn't mean that people just starting are idiots. So I don't know alot about scientific stuff, big deal bit(h. Though I still don't agree with the others that are posting here, and they still don't agree with me, we all, well almost all, are still respecting each other. So keep that childish $hit to yourself. Better yet, don't respond to anything I post. There is no room for "I am greater than thou" attitudes. I don't mind debates, bcuz some are fruitful. But the deragatory BS your talking doesn't help a damn thing. |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Amps, more argument!
|
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Amps, more argument!
In article oXgUb.177179$5V2.879280@attbi_s53, "Paul Vina" wrote:
Where you have the gain set has nothing to do with whether or not you're A) abusing it, or B) overdriving it. Half gain may be WELL into clipping depending on the output voltage of your HU, which can, over time, hurt your amp. Just because your Care to explain how this can hurt your amp ? Paul Vina |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Amps, more argument!
No, only the ones who refuse to realize that they do not know what is going on and keep arguing against the facts, like howdy and pugsly. And those who will not answer simple questions that would help them understand and keep the discussion moving foward. You fit both of those. What facts are you taking about? You didn't produce any facts other then being on noob and that i agree with. So I provide reasoning and show you the way it really is repeatedly and that makes me childish? Only in your own twisted mind. I attempted to explain to you that I do not doubt you heard a difference, but what you attributed it too was wrong. You still, without any proof or logic, continued to argue. Well, I do not have time for that so I classified you into the only 2 catergories I saw. You are the one who chose to see yourself as the idiot. If you don't have the time to post, then why even bother? You never brought any information to debate with!!!! I even gave you questions for you to answer to continue the discussion, but you refused to even acknowledge them. I have no problem debating with people, but when they have little knowledge of the topic and no desire to learn about it, then the debate is impossible. If you want to actually discuss the matter then answer the questions I have already asked, but once you answer those you will probably see the flaws in your logic. Les |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Amps, more argument!
What facts are you taking about? You didn't produce any facts other then
being on noob and that i agree with. How about the fact that a properly working amplifier has insignifigant differences in it's measurements from another amplifier. How can you hear a difference that is not there? When all of the data shows that the differences are below the threshold of our hearing, especially in a car enviroment. Carsound.com can verify that, as well as measurements that I and others have taken. I have made that point repeatedly. Yet, you and others continue to avoid the simple question. If all of the parameters that factor into "SQ" remain largely the same then how can you hear a difference? Answer that Howdy and maybe you can have a discussion. Until then you are just a noob, you can call me one but my posts suggest otherwise, and well, your posts speak volumes about how confused you really are on virtually any topic. If you don't have the time to post, then why even bother? Ah yes, I forget that your reading comprehension skills are extremely poor. The implication is that I do not have the time to post the same thing over and over again to a noob who refuses to listen, but I will always have time to make your noobie ass look foolish. So, Howdy, until you can actually offer something besides "I heard it" then your point is moot. Bring something to the table and maybe, just maybe, you can get someone to consider your point. But as long as you have the obvious noobs on your side you seem to be happy, hey, whatever you need to get you through the day. Les |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Amps, more argument!
Were is the proof in regard to your argument or anyone else's for that matter
on this topic? In most of the posts that I make, where is yours? Les |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Amps, more argument!
I don't doubt you heard a difference, but what you attribute it to i wrong What did I attribute it to I couldn't care less who can verify what. They can't verify what' going on in my car. They're not there. So when I can hear AND feel the lows differently between 2 amps even a low volume, what in the hell could it be besides the amps just soun different?! What? Oh, yes I'll hold while you consult your littl website, lol The things you state as "facts" are hilarious. Especially whe everytime I listen to my stereo it contradicts your "facts". I thin the only fact here is that you haven't heard my stereo, and neithe have the people from the site you keep mentioning I don't care what gadgets anyone uses to adjust my 2 amps to mak everything "equal", their notes will still sound and feel different Feel free to keep calling me a "noob". Webster "verified" that there i no such word Moohahaha [sneeky - Will_Skill ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Posted via RealCarAudio.com - The checkmate of the caraudio community http://www.RealCarAudio.co Will_Skillz's Profile: http://www.realcaraudio.com/forums/m...nfo&userid=118 View this thread: http://www.realcaraudio.com/forums/s...?threadid=4551 |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Amps, more argument!
What did I attribute it to?
You attributed it to SQ, which unless one amp is faulty it is not. I couldn't care less who can verify what. They can't verify what's going on in my car. They're not there. Noone has to be there. The principles of physics do not change in your car. So when I can hear AND feel the lows differently between 2 amps even at low volume, what in the hell could it be besides the amps just sound different?! What? Oh, yes I'll hold while you consult your little website, lol. Sorry no website, just several years of research and listening to those who know more than me. What else could it be? Well, different gain structures, different crossover points, pyschoacoustics, more actual power, NOT SQ. You tell me Will, what factors DO contribute to the "SQ" change as you describe? Your little "I can hear it and feel it" crap is just that, crap. The things you state as "facts" are hilarious. Especially when everytime I listen to my stereo it contradicts your "facts". I think the only fact here is that you haven't heard my stereo, and neither have the people from the site you keep mentioning. You stuck on some site? Carsound.com does independent tests of amplifiers, and they publish the results. If you would have visited the site you not only would know what it was but why I referenced it. ANd the fact still remains that you do not know what in the blue hell you are talking about. I have given you several other factors that could be contributing to the "difference" you describe, yet you ignore all of those as it has to be some phantom SQ difference. I don't care what gadgets anyone uses to adjust my 2 amps to make everything "equal", their notes will still sound and feel different. You really are an idiot, at first I though maybe just a noob who doesn't know. But now you are just an idiot. Your little statement makes you less credible. You are unwilling to listen to FACTS because your noobie ass "knows". Whatever will, I have seen many noobs come and go and you will just be another one of those. Maybe one day you will use your brain, go ahead and keep it up and maybe one day you can look like a dumbass like your hero Howdy. Les |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Amps, more argument!
Where you have the gain set has nothing to do with whether or not you're
A) abusing it, or B) overdriving it. Half gain may be WELL into clipping depending on the output voltage of your HU, which can, over time, hurt your amp. Just because your Care to explain how this can hurt your amp ? Overdriving an amp can be harmful due to excess heat. Most amps hold up reasonably well though. |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Amps, more argument!
No idea, it isn't due to power output.
How do you know? Did you measure it? Is there something that i have missed? I already listed them, so yeah. |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Amps, more argument!
A couple of questions as I am curious:
When you did your comparison were you running just the subs or were you playing the system with everything (i.e. components and/or coaxials)? Are the crossovers on the amps in question defeatable, I don't think they are? I noticed that each amp in question uses a different crossover slope (18db for the PG and 24db for the Ultimate). This in of itself (if they're being used, which I'm making the assumption they are) will lead to different perceived results. Overlap or the lack of overlap may be occuring between the components and the subs. This may be 'causing a 'blurring' of the basslines/drums. Plopping in one amp with the different slope may have 'cleaned up' the overlap so that your components and subs were better matched. I would be inclined to think that some tweaking/adjusting between your component amp crossover and the Ultimate crossover would help 'clean' that blurring up. "Will_Skillz" wrote in message ... I know from personal experience that amps sound different than the next without clipping. I went from an Ultimate Digitalis 1300S to a Phoenix Gold Tantrum 1200.1. The difference was night and day. Same sub, same box, same car, same features, same impedance load (4ohms). I popped my trunk and listened to the sound of my sub when powered by the Digitalis, and drums sounded like anything BUT drums. Recordings with drum hits close together, or with basslines that fluctuated sounded like TRASH. Everything ran together. While playing a test tone to adjust my gain properly I could barely tell when it started distorting, it was that horrible. On the other hand, when I got my Tantrum amp drums sounded perfect, even when played close together. And fluctuating basslines were played perfectly. It just sounded like the Tantrum had better control over my sub than my Digitalis. There was a H U G E difference in SQ between the two, even at low volume. -- Will_Skillz ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Posted via RealCarAudio.com - The checkmate of the caraudio community. http://www.RealCarAudio.com Will_Skillz's Profile: http://www.realcaraudio.com/forums/m...fo&userid=1186 View this thread: http://www.realcaraudio.com/forums/s...threadid=45516 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.564 / Virus Database: 356 - Release Date: 1/19/2004 |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
Amps, more argument!
You would have to be over-driving the amp for one hell of a longtime before if
would go into melt down even if there was no thermo protection which most amps have anyways. If anything would hurt the amp would be the speaker that would get damaged in the process, but that's not the question at hand. Care to explain how this can hurt your amp ? Overdriving an amp can be harmful due to excess heat. Most amps hold up reasonably well though. |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Amps, more argument!
|
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Amps, more argument!
Your first link doesn't appear to say anything soundfreak hasn't said
already. The second link is stereophile. Enough said. I didn't even click on that. "Captain Howdy" wrote in message ... In article , othanks (Soundfreak03) wrote: What facts are you taking about? You didn't produce any facts other then being on noob and that i agree with. How about the fact that a properly working amplifier has insignifigant differences in it's measurements from another amplifier. How can you hear a difference that is not there? When all of the data shows that the differences are below the threshold of our hearing, especially in a car enviroment. Carsound.com can verify that, as well as measurements that I and others have taken. I have made that point repeatedly. Yet, you and others continue to avoid the simple question. If all of the parameters that factor into "SQ" remain largely the same then how can you hear a difference? Answer that Howdy and maybe you can have a discussion. Until then you are just a noob, you can call me one but my posts suggest otherwise, and well, your posts speak volumes about how confused you really are on virtually any topic. Try this link and tell me what you think http://sound.westhost.com/amp-sound.htm http://www.stereophile.com/features/113/ If you don't have the time to post, then why even bother? Ah yes, I forget that your reading comprehension skills are extremely poor. The implication is that I do not have the time to post the same thing over and over again to a noob who refuses to listen, but I will always have time to make your noobie ass look foolish. You can sure try.You haven't done it yet. So, Howdy, until you can actually offer something besides "I heard it" then your point is moot. Bring something to the table and maybe, just maybe, you can get someone to consider your point. But as long as you have the obvious noobs on your side you seem to be happy, hey, whatever you need to get you through the day. Les |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
Amps, more argument!
I guess pushing the outputs past their design limit won't hurt anything,
huh? I'm sure the power supply would be happy with being overdriven as well. Paul Vina "Captain Howdy" wrote in message ... In article oXgUb.177179$5V2.879280@attbi_s53, "Paul Vina" wrote: Where you have the gain set has nothing to do with whether or not you're A) abusing it, or B) overdriving it. Half gain may be WELL into clipping depending on the output voltage of your HU, which can, over time, hurt your amp. Just because your Care to explain how this can hurt your amp ? Paul Vina |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
Amps, more argument!
I hate to break it to you soundfreak, but I don't think will is going to
change his mind about it, he knows, or in your opinion "precieves" a difference, and that's really all that matters. To him there is a difference. Don't turn this into a Runner vs. Nousaine post. "Soundfreak03" wrote in message ... What did I attribute it to? You attributed it to SQ, which unless one amp is faulty it is not. I couldn't care less who can verify what. They can't verify what's going on in my car. They're not there. Noone has to be there. The principles of physics do not change in your car. So when I can hear AND feel the lows differently between 2 amps even at low volume, what in the hell could it be besides the amps just sound different?! What? Oh, yes I'll hold while you consult your little website, lol. Sorry no website, just several years of research and listening to those who know more than me. What else could it be? Well, different gain structures, different crossover points, pyschoacoustics, more actual power, NOT SQ. You tell me Will, what factors DO contribute to the "SQ" change as you describe? Your little "I can hear it and feel it" crap is just that, crap. The things you state as "facts" are hilarious. Especially when everytime I listen to my stereo it contradicts your "facts". I think the only fact here is that you haven't heard my stereo, and neither have the people from the site you keep mentioning. You stuck on some site? Carsound.com does independent tests of amplifiers, and they publish the results. If you would have visited the site you not only would know what it was but why I referenced it. ANd the fact still remains that you do not know what in the blue hell you are talking about. I have given you several other factors that could be contributing to the "difference" you describe, yet you ignore all of those as it has to be some phantom SQ difference. I don't care what gadgets anyone uses to adjust my 2 amps to make everything "equal", their notes will still sound and feel different. You really are an idiot, at first I though maybe just a noob who doesn't know. But now you are just an idiot. Your little statement makes you less credible. You are unwilling to listen to FACTS because your noobie ass "knows". Whatever will, I have seen many noobs come and go and you will just be another one of those. Maybe one day you will use your brain, go ahead and keep it up and maybe one day you can look like a dumbass like your hero Howdy. Les |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
Amps, more argument!
SQ is the accurate reproduction of sound. Period. How we percieve it may
be different, but that's not what's in question. Paul Vina "Captain Howdy" wrote in message ... Who are you to say what true SQ really is? SQ is nothing but a preference that changes from one person to the next? In article , othanks (Soundfreak03) wrote: What did I attribute it to? You attributed it to SQ, which unless one amp is faulty it is not. I couldn't care less who can verify what. They can't verify what's going on in my car. They're not there. Noone has to be there. The principles of physics do not change in your car. So when I can hear AND feel the lows differently between 2 amps even at low volume, what in the hell could it be besides the amps just sound different?! What? Oh, yes I'll hold while you consult your little website, lol. Sorry no website, just several years of research and listening to those who know more than me. What else could it be? Well, different gain structures, different crossover points, pyschoacoustics, more actual power, NOT SQ. You tell me Will, what factors DO contribute to the "SQ" change as you describe? Your little "I can hear it and feel it" crap is just that, crap. The things you state as "facts" are hilarious. Especially when everytime I listen to my stereo it contradicts your "facts". I think the only fact here is that you haven't heard my stereo, and neither have the people from the site you keep mentioning. You stuck on some site? Carsound.com does independent tests of amplifiers, and they publish the results. If you would have visited the site you not only would know what it was but why I referenced it. ANd the fact still remains that you do not know what in the blue hell you are talking about. I have given you several other factors that could be contributing to the "difference" you describe, yet you ignore all of those as it has to be some phantom SQ difference. I don't care what gadgets anyone uses to adjust my 2 amps to make everything "equal", their notes will still sound and feel different. Since you like me so much that you include me in almost all of your posts, how about giving up a little head? You really are an idiot, at first I though maybe just a noob who doesn't know. But now you are just an idiot. Your little statement makes you less credible. You are unwilling to listen to FACTS because your noobie ass "knows". Whatever will, I have seen many noobs come and go and you will just be another one of those. Maybe one day you will use your brain, go ahead and keep it up and maybe one day you can look like a dumbass like your hero Howdy. Les |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
Amps, more argument!
Who are you to say what true SQ really is? SQ is nothing but a preference
that changes from one person to the next? I am not. But what he is attributed to "SQ" is very likely something else. I would not tell someone that something sounds good to them, but I will point out when someone attributes something to SQ of an amp when it is not. Les |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
Amps, more argument!
Try this link and tell me what you think
http://sound.westhost.com/amp-sound.htm Well the only time he can attribute to one amp sounding different than the other is when it is clipped. I have said all along that they sound the same when they are not clipped and agreed that do sound different when they are. And since his article focuses mostly on different types of distortion it is fairly useless to the argument. But I think this guy knows some stuff, but in the end he is stretching to find something, much like you. By the end of the article he completey ignores the facts of pychoacoustics and preconceived notions. He always suggests that amps do sound different, though he admits that in proper test conditions where it is controlled they do not. In the end he "hopes" for something that will "prove" that amps sound different. Alas, he shall be waiting for a long time. I hope you were not actually using that as reasons for your "amps sound different" argument, it just makes your case look worse. http://www.stereophile.com/features/113/ You have got to be kidding me right? You are not actually going to try and use this for a reference. But I read it anyway. Again, he has a theory that they sound different yet cannot refute the physics staring him in the face. But one day physics may change and you can be happy, until then... Les |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
Amps, more argument!
again to a noob who refuses to listen, but I will always have time to make
your noobie ass look foolish. You can sure try.You haven't done it yet. Howdy, Yes, he's made you look foolish each and every time. Why are you arguing with him??? He knows 10 times more about car audio than you!!! WTF?? Trust me, as an outside observer who's just been reading along...you're never going to win. And I get the feeling that if you did, he would admit it. But you clearly know just enough about what you're talking about to get yourself in trouble. Kind of like a brown belt that thinks he knows karate until he goes out and gets in a fight and gets his ass kicked. HOWDY, YOU'RE GETTING YOUR ASS KICKED! You need to recognize this and step down. Tony Tony -- What's more likely? That an all-powerful mysterious god created the universe and then decided not to give any proof of his existence? Or, that he simply doesn't exist at all? And that we created him so that we wouldn't have to feel so small and alone. -Eleanor Arroway, Contact "Captain Howdy" wrote in message ... In article , othanks (Soundfreak03) wrote: What facts are you taking about? You didn't produce any facts other then being on noob and that i agree with. How about the fact that a properly working amplifier has insignifigant differences in it's measurements from another amplifier. How can you hear a difference that is not there? When all of the data shows that the differences are below the threshold of our hearing, especially in a car enviroment. Carsound.com can verify that, as well as measurements that I and others have taken. I have made that point repeatedly. Yet, you and others continue to avoid the simple question. If all of the parameters that factor into "SQ" remain largely the same then how can you hear a difference? Answer that Howdy and maybe you can have a discussion. Until then you are just a noob, you can call me one but my posts suggest otherwise, and well, your posts speak volumes about how confused you really are on virtually any topic. Try this link and tell me what you think http://sound.westhost.com/amp-sound.htm http://www.stereophile.com/features/113/ If you don't have the time to post, then why even bother? Ah yes, I forget that your reading comprehension skills are extremely poor. The implication is that I do not have the time to post the same thing over and over again to a noob who refuses to listen, but I will always have time to make your noobie ass look foolish. You can sure try.You haven't done it yet. So, Howdy, until you can actually offer something besides "I heard it" then your point is moot. Bring something to the table and maybe, just maybe, you can get someone to consider your point. But as long as you have the obvious noobs on your side you seem to be happy, hey, whatever you need to get you through the day. Les |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
Amps, more argument!
change his mind about it, he knows, or in your opinion "precieves" a
difference, and that's really all that matters. I have to agree that Will's mind will never be changed. Moreover, there's really almost no point to Les's side of the argument (no matter how true it may be or that I agree with him!). In order to prove that Les and Mark and the others are right (which they are!) you'd need to conduct testing under conditions that simply do not occur in the real world of car audio. Levels do not get matched, things do not remain constant. Clean power is clean power and that'll always be true, but the nature of car audio creates an environment where sound, or at least -perceived- sound often does change from amp to amp. This isn't an argument about right or wrong anymore, it's an argument over pointless bull**** between two sides who both refuse to relinquish. I'm sorry I started the thread, please forgive me. |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
Amps, more argument!
I hate to break it to you soundfreak, but I don't think will is going to
change his mind about it, he knows, or in your opinion "precieves" a difference, and that's really all that matters. To him there is a difference. Don't turn this into a Runner vs. Nousaine post. I hate to break it to you Luke, but physics doesn't change in Will's car and Will will likely never actually know anything about car audio. There are 2 points that I have constantly made. Point one: Drive an amp within its limits and they sound the same, assuming you have a properly functioning amp. Point two: There are far more important things to consider when purchasing an amp. He percieves a difference and I, and others, pointed out to him that the difference was not what he attributed it too. But him being a noob he decided to challenge it without logic or evidence and well, this is what you get. I gave up on Will as ever being knowledgeable around the 3rd post he made, but others are still reading this thread and they will see the evidence for themselves. Did you even have a point to your post? Les |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
Amps, more argument!
I have to agree that Will's mind will never be changed. Moreover, there's
really almost no point to Les's side of the argument (no matter how true it may be or that I agree with him!). Steve, there is a point to what I have been saying all along. I listed it in a previous post but will relist it. 1) When operating an amp within it's designed limits, they will sound the same. 2) There are far more important things to consider than an amps "SQ", which have been listed several times. Number 2 is the most important one imo, But you cannot understand or get that without first understanding number 1. That is why I gave the advice at the start that I did. In order to prove that Les and Mark and the others are right (which they are!) you'd need to conduct testing under conditions that simply do not occur in the real world of car audio. No need. The testing has already been done. And you are right those conditions do not readily occur in a daily driver. But it is still important to understand the results of those contolled tests and what they mean for you! It is not an argument over right or wrong, it is can you look at the data that is there and use it to your advantage. Then actually make intelligent desicions based on facts and logic rather than audio myths. Your system, and likely bank account, will be most happy. But, obviously howdy and will cannot, they will continue to be suckered by marketing gimmicks and overlook the important things. Oh well, thier loss. Les |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
Amps, more argument!
The purpose of the discussion is to dispell the common myth that you need to
buy a "high end" amplifier for good sound. The fact remains that a "high end" (read: expensive) amp gives you NOTHING that a lower priced amp gives you. In fact, there are several cases where people decline the mid-priced amp, which has better features for that particular user, in favor of a high-priced "high end" amp. Therefore, they're making the wrong decision. If you don't think this is common, then you haven't hung around in here long enough. "Steve Grauman" wrote in message ... change his mind about it, he knows, or in your opinion "precieves" a difference, and that's really all that matters. I have to agree that Will's mind will never be changed. Moreover, there's really almost no point to Les's side of the argument (no matter how true it may be or that I agree with him!). In order to prove that Les and Mark and the others are right (which they are!) you'd need to conduct testing under conditions that simply do not occur in the real world of car audio. Levels do not get matched, things do not remain constant. Clean power is clean power and that'll always be true, but the nature of car audio creates an environment where sound, or at least -perceived- sound often does change from amp to amp. This isn't an argument about right or wrong anymore, it's an argument over pointless bull**** between two sides who both refuse to relinquish. I'm sorry I started the thread, please forgive me. |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
Amps, more argument!
Steve, there is a point to what I have been saying all along.
I know, that's not really what I meant. I agree with you, and I know you're correct. I'm simply saying that there's no convinving the daft, and having a battle of the wits with an unarmed opponent is no fun. |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
Amps, more argument!
The purpose of the discussion is to dispell the common myth that you need to
buy a "high end" amplifier for good sound. I understand all that, and I'm not saying you're wrong (in fact, I've agreed with you). I'm simply saying that there's no convincing some people, even when you have truth on your side. Will is obviously unwilling to make the leap from perception to reality, and realizing that would end the debate and the waste of bandwidth. |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
Amps, more argument!
It seems that people do hear differences between amplifiers, why don't you and
soundgeek? In article , "Mark Zarella" wrote: Your first link doesn't appear to say anything soundfreak hasn't said already. The second link is stereophile. Enough said. I didn't even click on that. "Captain Howdy" wrote in message ... In article , (Soundfreak03) wrote: What facts are you taking about? You didn't produce any facts other then being on noob and that i agree with. How about the fact that a properly working amplifier has insignifigant differences in it's measurements from another amplifier. How can you hear a difference that is not there? When all of the data shows that the differences are below the threshold of our hearing, especially in a car enviroment. Carsound.com can verify that, as well as measurements that I and others have taken. I have made that point repeatedly. Yet, you and others continue to avoid the simple question. If all of the parameters that factor into "SQ" remain largely the same then how can you hear a difference? Answer that Howdy and maybe you can have a discussion. Until then you are just a noob, you can call me one but my posts suggest otherwise, and well, your posts speak volumes about how confused you really are on virtually any topic. Try this link and tell me what you think http://sound.westhost.com/amp-sound.htm http://www.stereophile.com/features/113/ If you don't have the time to post, then why even bother? Ah yes, I forget that your reading comprehension skills are extremely poor. The implication is that I do not have the time to post the same thing over and over again to a noob who refuses to listen, but I will always have time to make your noobie ass look foolish. You can sure try.You haven't done it yet. So, Howdy, until you can actually offer something besides "I heard it" then your point is moot. Bring something to the table and maybe, just maybe, you can get someone to consider your point. But as long as you have the obvious noobs on your side you seem to be happy, hey, whatever you need to get you through the day. Les |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
Amps, more argument!
In article , othanks (Soundfreak03) wrote:
Try this link and tell me what you think http://sound.westhost.com/amp-sound.htm Well the only time he can attribute to one amp sounding different than the other is when it is clipped. I have said all along that they sound the same when they are not clipped and agreed that do sound different when they are. And since his article focuses mostly on different types of distortion it is fairly useless to the argument. If all amps shared the same levels of distortion and x-over distortion, and other factors, you'de be right about the above, but that is not the case. But I think this guy knows some stuff, but in the end he is stretching to find something, much like you. By the end of the article he completey ignores the facts of pychoacoustics and preconceived notions. He always suggests that amps do sound different, though he admits that in proper test conditions where it is controlled they do not. In the end he "hopes" for something that will "prove" that amps sound different. Alas, he shall be waiting for a long time. I hope you were not actually using that as reasons for your "amps sound different" argument, it just makes your case look worse. It shows that people do hear a difference in amps even under normal use. That's my point. http://www.stereophile.com/features/113/ You have got to be kidding me right? You are not actually going to try and use this for a reference. But I read it anyway. Again, he has a theory that they sound different yet cannot refute the physics staring him in the face. But one day physics may change and you can be happy, until then... Les |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
Amps, more argument!
My question is, what would it hurt ? In article eeBUb.184584$sv6.952735@attbi_s52, "Paul Vina" wrote: I guess pushing the outputs past their design limit won't hurt anything, huh? I'm sure the power supply would be happy with being overdriven as well. Paul Vina "Captain Howdy" wrote in message ... In article oXgUb.177179$5V2.879280@attbi_s53, "Paul Vina" wrote: Where you have the gain set has nothing to do with whether or not you're A) abusing it, or B) overdriving it. Half gain may be WELL into clipping depending on the output voltage of your HU, which can, over time, hurt your amp. Just because your Care to explain how this can hurt your amp ? Paul Vina |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
Amps, more argument!
It seems that people do hear differences between amplifiers, why don't you
and soundgeek? The question isn't really wether people hear a difference, it's about if there's actually a difference or if you're simply hearing the things you want to. I've always thought that I could detect a difference in sound between home A/V recievers, but I always attributed the differences to the unit's DACs and power output more than the amp itself. Even if there really is a sonic difference between those A/V recievers (and I'm not entirely positive it wasn't just my mind playing tricks on me), car audio amps don't have DACs that can color the sound, and if the THD is below .10%, than it's inaudible and won't have an effect. You can swap between an Audiobahn amp and a Zapco competition series- if everything else remains consistant (like crossover points, the speakers used, amp-power output, etc...) there should be no detecable sonic differences between the amps. Obviously, going from a 75x2 amp to a 125x2 will yield some difference, especially if you drove the less powerful unit into clipping, but we're talking about equally matched units here. Would Richard Clark really be gambling $10,000 on this if he thought there was a significant chance of his "theory" being wrong? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
amps, amps, amps | Car Audio | |||
Tons of stuff to sell - amps, head unit, processors, etc. | Car Audio | |||
Garage sale still going - added new stuff. | Car Audio | |||
Geo's garage sale - Good stuff for cheap! | Car Audio | |||
Physically small amps? | Car Audio |