Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Question for the Ferstlerian
Harold, this question should be right up your alley, even though it's in the nature of what you quaintly call "shopping advice". I will note, note, that advice about my question is welcome from anybody, including Ferstler, but I will also utter the caveat that any response from Krooger will be dismissed summarily. I want to upgrade my surround preamp. My Lexicon is getting long in the tooth, and I might want to try out 7.1 or 7.2 surround. (Don't have the speakers yet, but I'll have to match my existing speakers, so that's not really an issue.) My other priorities are minimal -- I don't need a phono stage, I don't need Zone 2 distribution, and I don't need dual subs. A tuner would be a plus, a learning remote is unnecessary, but OSD is valuable to me. Another plus would be component video switching. The main concern is price. I'm open to buying used; in fact, that's my preference, since it's favorable in terms of bang for the buck. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"George M. Middius" wrote:
Harold, this question should be right up your alley, even though it's in the nature of what you quaintly call "shopping advice". I will note, note, that advice about my question is welcome from anybody, including Ferstler, but I will also utter the caveat that any response from Krooger will be dismissed summarily. I want to upgrade my surround preamp. My Lexicon is getting long in the tooth, and I might want to try out 7.1 or 7.2 surround. (Don't have the speakers yet, but I'll have to match my existing speakers, so that's not really an issue.) My other priorities are minimal -- I don't need a phono stage, I don't need Zone 2 distribution, and I don't need dual subs. A tuner would be a plus, a learning remote is unnecessary, but OSD is valuable to me. Another plus would be component video switching. The main concern is price. I'm open to buying used; in fact, that's my preference, since it's favorable in terms of bang for the buck. Shop around for a more recent Lexicon unit (possibly used), although I will admit that the models that followed the DC-1 got more and more out of reach for guys like you and me. Actually, that DC-1 ought to still be pretty competitive when it comes to musical work. But, yes, if you want component switching you need an upgrade. A big Yamaha receiver (a used RX-Z1, for example) would work just fine. It would also include DPL II, although not the latest IIx version. The very latest RX-Z9 receiver is a bit rich for my blood, but maybe you can afford it. Unlike all previous Yamaha units, it is THX Ultra certified. Yeah, I like Yamaha, mainly because it seems to have the best balance for working with two-channel music sources and simulating surround sound. However, the Lexicon Music Logic function is still a fabulous feature, and the DC-1 does have that, as do the later versions. Howard Ferstler |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Poor Howard Ferstler said: Harold, this question should be right up your alley, even though it's in the nature of what you quaintly call "shopping advice". I will note, note, that advice about my question is welcome from anybody, including Ferstler, but I will also utter the caveat that any response from Krooger will be dismissed summarily. I want to upgrade my surround preamp. My Lexicon is getting long in the tooth, and I might want to try out 7.1 or 7.2 surround. (Don't have the speakers yet, but I'll have to match my existing speakers, so that's not really an issue.) My other priorities are minimal -- I don't need a phono stage, I don't need Zone 2 distribution, and I don't need dual subs. A tuner would be a plus, a learning remote is unnecessary, but OSD is valuable to me. Another plus would be component video switching. The main concern is price. I'm open to buying used; in fact, that's my preference, since it's favorable in terms of bang for the buck. Shop around for a more recent Lexicon unit (possibly used), although I will admit that the models that followed the DC-1 got more and more out of reach for guys like you and me. Actually, that DC-1 ought to still be pretty competitive when it comes to musical work. But, yes, if you want component switching you need an upgrade. Harold, you nitwit, I don't have a DC-1. A big Yamaha receiver (a used RX-Z1, for example) would work just fine. It would also include DPL II, although not the latest IIx version. The very latest RX-Z9 receiver is a bit rich for my blood, but maybe you can afford it. Unlike all previous Yamaha units, it is THX Ultra certified. Yuck. Yeah, I like Yamaha, mainly because it seems to have the best balance for working with two-channel music sources and simulating surround sound. However, the Lexicon Music Logic function is still a fabulous feature, and the DC-1 does have that, as do the later versions. God, you are out of touch. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"George M. Middius" wrote:
Poor Howard Ferstler said: Harold, this question should be right up your alley, even though it's in the nature of what you quaintly call "shopping advice". I will note, note, that advice about my question is welcome from anybody, including Ferstler, but I will also utter the caveat that any response from Krooger will be dismissed summarily. I want to upgrade my surround preamp. My Lexicon is getting long in the tooth, and I might want to try out 7.1 or 7.2 surround. (Don't have the speakers yet, but I'll have to match my existing speakers, so that's not really an issue.) My other priorities are minimal -- I don't need a phono stage, I don't need Zone 2 distribution, and I don't need dual subs. A tuner would be a plus, a learning remote is unnecessary, but OSD is valuable to me. Another plus would be component video switching. The main concern is price. I'm open to buying used; in fact, that's my preference, since it's favorable in terms of bang for the buck. Shop around for a more recent Lexicon unit (possibly used), although I will admit that the models that followed the DC-1 got more and more out of reach for guys like you and me. Actually, that DC-1 ought to still be pretty competitive when it comes to musical work. But, yes, if you want component switching you need an upgrade. Harold, you nitwit, I don't have a DC-1. Hmmmm. I could swear that somewhere in the past I read where you had a DC-1. If you do not, too bad. You do not know what you are missing. A big Yamaha receiver (a used RX-Z1, for example) would work just fine. It would also include DPL II, although not the latest IIx version. The very latest RX-Z9 receiver is a bit rich for my blood, but maybe you can afford it. Unlike all previous Yamaha units, it is THX Ultra certified. Yuck. No doubt you are very familiar with the unit and have listened to it extensively and compared it closely with other models. I did this, by the way, and even compared the older DSP-A1 version (an integrated amp, actually, and not a receiver) against the DC-1. Did a regular series of A/B comparisons between the front-channel steering abilities of each unit. Too bad you missed those. Yeah, I like Yamaha, mainly because it seems to have the best balance for working with two-channel music sources and simulating surround sound. However, the Lexicon Music Logic function is still a fabulous feature, and the DC-1 does have that, as do the later versions. God, you are out of touch. I am pretty sure that all you wanted to initially do with your post was set me up for some of your typically mean, petty, and proto-witty comments. I should have known. Howard Ferstler |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Robert Morein wrote:
In article , "George M. Middius" wrote: The main concern is price. I'm open to buying used; in fact, that's my preference, since it's favorable in terms of bang for the buck. Doesn't make quite such a big dent in your welfare check, you mean. Maybe you can find a hifi dealer that takes food stamps! Bob An appropriate response to questions from a guy like Middius, and much more in line with what I should have said to him, instead of taking him seriously. Howard Ferstler |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Brother Horace the Clueless whined: Harold, you nitwit, I don't have a DC-1. Hmmmm. I could swear that somewhere in the past I read where you had a DC-1. If you do not, too bad. You do not know what you are missing. That's like saying if you don't have a Chevy Monte Carlo, you don't know what you're missing. Even if you drive a 911. You are *so* clueless. If the Clue Store called to say they were having a 2-for-1 special, you'd probably say you can only afford one clue. A big Yamaha receiver Yuck. No doubt you are very familiar with the unit Dork. It's too expensive even on top of being not what I want. against the DC-1. Idiot. the DC-1 God, you are out of touch. I am pretty sure that all you wanted to initially do with your post was set me up for some of your typically mean, petty, and proto-witty comments. Not true, moron. I was hoping you'd have some advice on obtaining comparable performance to my Lexicon but with some of the newer surround features. I should have known. No, I should have known. I've already done some of my own research. The best choices I've found under $1500 are Adcom, Rotel, and Marantz. Of course you don't know anything about any of their models, being both clueless and useless. Do you know where the Outlaw 950 falls short? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Brother Horace "Bwian is my hero" the Overly Dim said: An appropriate response to questions from a guy like You are officially pals with RAO's resident psychopath. And Krooger the pedophile, of course. Does that give you a warm fuzzy, Clerkie? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"George M. Middius" wrote in message ... You are officially pals with RAO's resident psychopath. And Krooger the pedophile, of course. Does that give you a warm fuzzy, Clerkie? I don't think so, being that Howie is a bit past 14. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"George M. Middius" wrote:
Brother Horace the Clueless whined: A big Yamaha receiver Yuck. No doubt you are very familiar with the unit Dork. It's too expensive even on top of being not what I want. So, your "Yuck" is conjecture. against the DC-1. Idiot. OK, so I do not closely follow your purchasing decisions. So, just what Lexicon unit do you own? I am pretty certain that someone here, quite some time ago, said that you owned a DC-1. If you have one of the earlier units it is time to upgrade. If you have one of the later processors, you will be a fool to upgrade at this time. I am pretty sure that all you wanted to initially do with your post was set me up for some of your typically mean, petty, and proto-witty comments. Not true, moron. Mean, petty, and proto-witty. I rest my case. I've already done some of my own research. The best choices I've found under $1500 are Adcom, Rotel, and Marantz. Of course you don't know anything about any of their models, being both clueless and useless. I have not reviewed any of them. However, assuming that they have the usual required features (especially DPL II, if you are truly interested in music reproduction), any of them should work just fine. Do you know where the Outlaw 950 falls short? I reviewed the 1050 receiver in issue 86 of The Sensible Sound. I did find some problems (some of them rather odd), but you will have to read the review to see what they were. As for the 950, I have no idea of its capabilities. Howard Ferstler |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Brother Horace the Clueless (Redux) puled: Dork. It's too expensive even on top of being not what I want. So, your "Yuck" is conjecture. Doesn't it ring a bell though? It's the same reaction you get when you nag people to read your "published stuff". We all know that as far as Ferstler's prose, if it drones like Ferstler and bores like Ferstler and prattles like Ferstler, it's the same old Ferstler. against the DC-1. Idiot. OK, so I do not closely follow your purchasing decisions. So, just what Lexicon unit do you own? I am pretty certain that someone here, quite some time ago, said that you owned a DC-1. If you have one of the earlier units it is time to upgrade. If you have one of the later processors, you will be a fool to upgrade at this time. Do tell. Really. If you have anything useful to contribute, let it out. Bear in mind that the unit I have, which is an MC-1 as you should well know because I've talked about it several times, does not have component video switching or 7-channel surround. Or a tuner. Not true, moron. Mean, petty, and proto-witty. I rest my case. But Harold, you ineffable jackass, you puff yourself up constantly by calling people "moron" as well as other puerile names. Can't I be just as mean and petty as you are, and still keep my stellar wit? I've already done some of my own research. The best choices I've found under $1500 are Adcom, Rotel, and Marantz. Of course you don't know anything about any of their models, being both clueless and useless. I have not reviewed any of them. However, assuming that they have the usual required features (especially DPL II, if you are truly interested in music reproduction), any of them should work just fine. Do they have component video switching, sufficient digital coaxial audio inputs, OSD, 7-channel surround, and a tuner? Huh? Do they? Do you know which models are out, and which of them have which features? Do you have even a hint of a shadow of a ghost of a clue? Do you know where the Outlaw 950 falls short? As for the 950, I have no idea of its capabilities. Then you should hang your head in shame, and also shut your yapping gob. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 20:39:56 -0500, Howard Ferstler
wrote: Yuck. No doubt you are very familiar with the unit and have listened to it extensively and compared it closely with other models. You mean like you are with Quad speakers, right? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
dave weil said: Yuck. No doubt you are very familiar with the unit and have listened to it extensively and compared it closely with other models. You mean like you are with Quad speakers, right? Ferstler's Law of Pompous Pronunciamentos states that unless you've read every single article he's ever written for any magazine anywhere, you can't know for sure what his opinions are. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"George M. Middius" wrote:
Brother Horace the Clueless (Redux) puled: OK, so I do not closely follow your purchasing decisions. So, just what Lexicon unit do you own? I am pretty certain that someone here, quite some time ago, said that you owned a DC-1. If you have one of the earlier units it is time to upgrade. If you have one of the later processors, you will be a fool to upgrade at this time. Do tell. Really. If you have anything useful to contribute, let it out. Bear in mind that the unit I have, which is an MC-1 as you should well know because I've talked about it several times, does not have component video switching or 7-channel surround. Or a tuner. You can add a tuner. The MC-1 should already have seven channels: L,C, and R up front, plus the two side surrounds and the two back surrounds. It has the Logic-7 circuit, and that requires those seven outputs. As for component switching, well, yes, if you have a super-duper TV it would pay to add that option. I will say that any of the other units you mentioned will probably not be able to match the Logic-7 or Music Logic circuits when it comes to dealing with the generation of surround sound from two-channel sources. On the other hand, the Yamaha units I have reviewed can give those Lexicon functions genuine competition, at least with some room/speaker configurations. Not true, moron. Mean, petty, and proto-witty. I rest my case. But Harold, you ineffable jackass, you puff yourself up constantly by calling people "moron" as well as other puerile names. In my usage, this is not name calling. This is accurately describing audio nitwits. Can't I be just as mean and petty as you are, and still keep my stellar wit? You ain't all that witty, Middius. I've already done some of my own research. The best choices I've found under $1500 are Adcom, Rotel, and Marantz. Of course you don't know anything about any of their models, being both clueless and useless. I have not reviewed any of them. However, assuming that they have the usual required features (especially DPL II, if you are truly interested in music reproduction), any of them should work just fine. Do they have component video switching, sufficient digital coaxial audio inputs, OSD, 7-channel surround, and a tuner? Huh? Do they? Do you know which models are out, and which of them have which features? Do you have even a hint of a shadow of a ghost of a clue? Well, they probably have component switching, and the required number of inputs. Their OSD features are probably OK, but I rather prefer a decent front-panel readout for music listening. As I noted elsewhere, you can purchase a separate tuner. Regarding their 7-channel abilities, all probably fall short of what the MC-1 can do with two-channel surround synthesizing. Most AV receivers cannot do all that well, although if they have DPL II they probably are good enough for you. Do you know where the Outlaw 950 falls short? As for the 950, I have no idea of its capabilities. Then you should hang your head in shame, and also shut your yapping gob. I get the impression that your alternative sockpuppet handle was once Roy Briggs. Howard Ferstler |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
dave weil wrote:
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 20:39:56 -0500, Howard Ferstler wrote: Yuck. No doubt you are very familiar with the unit and have listened to it extensively and compared it closely with other models. You mean like you are with Quad speakers, right? We do need to remember that I never bad mouthed those speakers and never said that they would not stand up against competing models. I left the topic open. What I did say is that on a tape I have of a Floyd Toole lecture he did not have much good to say about Quad speakers. Given his feelings about imaging, soundstaging, flat response, and controlled dispersion, one would have to wonder about what the Quads could do that would matter to objective listeners. But, who knows, perhaps they are sensational. Howard Ferstler |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"George M. Middius" wrote:
dave weil said: Yuck. No doubt you are very familiar with the unit and have listened to it extensively and compared it closely with other models. You mean like you are with Quad speakers, right? Ferstler's Law of Pompous Pronunciamentos states that unless you've read every single article he's ever written for any magazine anywhere, you can't know for sure what his opinions are. Get busy. Howard Ferstler |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Howard Ferstler wrote "George M. Middius" wrote: dave weil said: Yuck. No doubt you are very familiar with the unit and have listened to it extensively and compared it closely with other models. You mean like you are with Quad speakers, right? Ferstler's Law of Pompous Pronunciamentos states that unless you've read every single article he's ever written for any magazine anywhere, you can't know for sure what his opinions are. Get busy. Howard Ferstler Do you feel ashamed of yourself sometimes? |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
EddieM wrote:
Do you feel ashamed of yourself sometimes? I am beginning to feel ashamed of wasting my time discussing audio with you, pinhead. Howard Ferstler |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Brother Horace the Infinitely Self-Aware cranked: But Harold, you ineffable jackass, you puff yourself up constantly by calling people "moron" as well as other puerile names. In my usage, this is not name calling. This is accurately describing audio nitwits. Unless your values are wrong, and in reality it's you who's the nitwit. Unfortunately, you have proven yourself obdurately resistant to any kind of assault by reality, so you will no doubt continue to wallow in your blissless pit of infamy and ignorance. Can't I be just as mean and petty as you are, and still keep my stellar wit? You ain't all that witty, Middius. But you are fitfully religious, which is ten times worse. Do they have component video switching, sufficient digital coaxial audio inputs, OSD, 7-channel surround, and a tuner? Huh? Do they? Do you know which models are out, and which of them have which features? Do you have even a hint of a shadow of a ghost of a clue? Well, they probably Idiot. If you don't believe you're being idiotic, ask dave to explain it to you. Moron. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Brother Horace the Ever-Hornier begged: Ferstler's Law of Pompous Pronunciamentos states that unless you've read every single article he's ever written for any magazine anywhere, you can't know for sure what his opinions are. Get busy. Get in line behind Lionella. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Brother Horace the Despicable said: Do you feel ashamed of yourself sometimes? I am beginning to feel ashamed of wasting my time discussing audio with you, pinhead. I think he was referring to your documented history of plagiarism, false attributions, obnoxious behavior, and theft of intellectual property. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
"George M. Middius" wrote:
Brother Horace the Infinitely Self-Aware cranked: But Harold, you ineffable jackass, you puff yourself up constantly by calling people "moron" as well as other puerile names. In my usage, this is not name calling. This is accurately describing audio nitwits. Unless your values are wrong, and in reality it's you who's the nitwit. Unfortunately, you have proven yourself obdurately resistant to any kind of assault by reality, And yet I still get articles published, have had four books published, and have helped to edit (with my name on the title page, yet) a rather large audio-related encyclopedia. Will wonders ever cease? Just for curiosity's sake, how many books and magazine articles have you had published, tweako? so you will no doubt continue to wallow in your blissless pit of infamy and ignorance. And be proud of all of the above-noted publications, and be happy that my having done all of that must drive you nuts. Can't I be just as mean and petty as you are, and still keep my stellar wit? You ain't all that witty, Middius. But you are fitfully religious, which is ten times worse. At least I do not believe in the audio equivalent of the tooth fairy, like you and your crazy, fellow lunkheads do, tweako. Actually, if you knew anything about me you would realize that I am the antithesis of religious. And you are a pest. Howard Ferstler |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
"George M. Middius" wrote:
Brother Horace the Despicable said: I am beginning to feel ashamed of wasting my time discussing audio with you, pinhead. I think he was referring to your documented history of plagiarism, false attributions, obnoxious behavior, and theft of intellectual property. And yet still published and publishing. Go cry in your beer, pinhead. Howard Ferstler |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Brother Horace the Aphasic said: Unless your values are wrong, and in reality it's you who's the nitwit. Unfortunately, you have proven yourself obdurately resistant to any kind of assault by reality, And yet I still get articles published And you're consistently unable to address your many shortcomings. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Brother Horace the Infantile said: I am beginning to feel ashamed of wasting my time discussing audio with you, pinhead. I think he was referring to your documented history of plagiarism, false attributions, obnoxious behavior, and theft of intellectual property. And yet still published More to the point, absymally lacking in any trace of self-awareness. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
The petty, spiteful nutball posting as "George M. Middius" goes for the
Big Enchilada of baseless allegations: snipped history of plagiarism, false attributions, theft of intellectual property. So many accusations, so little proof. :-0 |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
"George M. Middius" wrote:
Brother Horace the Aphasic said: Unless your values are wrong, and in reality it's you who's the nitwit. Unfortunately, you have proven yourself obdurately resistant to any kind of assault by reality, And yet I still get articles published And you're consistently unable to address your many shortcomings. Look who's talking! Howard Ferstler |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
"George M. Middius" wrote:
Brother Horace the Infantile said: I am beginning to feel ashamed of wasting my time discussing audio with you, pinhead. I think he was referring to your documented history of plagiarism, false attributions, obnoxious behavior, and theft of intellectual property. And yet still published More to the point, absymally lacking in any trace of self-awareness. But still published, tweako. Howard Ferstler |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Brother Horace the Lowdown wallows in the mud. When all else fails, grasp for straws. Or facts. Not surprising you can't tell the difference. So let's count up your admirers, Clerkie: You've got a pedophile and compulsive liar, a pseudonymous ****-eater who lives in his daddy's basement at the age of 48, an envy-choked sewer cleaner who is a paragon of pathos, and a grown man who's borderline illiterate and who gobbles six dozen pills per day while drooling on his bib. Wow, that's impressive. Too bad none of them can afford to buy your books. ;-) |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Brother Horace the IKYAWBWAIer said: Unless your values are wrong, and in reality it's you who's the nitwit. Unfortunately, you have proven yourself obdurately resistant to any kind of assault by reality, And yet I still get articles published And you're consistently unable to address your many shortcomings. Look who's talking! I will if you will. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
wrote
:-0 Look, Arny!!! I told you!!!! He popped in for a slurpy!!! |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 17:43:01 -0500, Howard Ferstler
wrote: dave weil wrote: On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 20:39:56 -0500, Howard Ferstler wrote: Yuck. No doubt you are very familiar with the unit and have listened to it extensively and compared it closely with other models. You mean like you are with Quad speakers, right? We do need to remember that I never bad mouthed those speakers and never said that they would not stand up against competing models. I left the topic open. Read your next sentence. What I did say is that on a tape I have of a Floyd Toole lecture he did not have much good to say about Quad speakers. Given his feelings about imaging, soundstaging, flat response, and controlled dispersion, one would have to wonder about what the Quads could do that would matter to objective listeners. But, who knows, perhaps they are sensational. They are. But it's likely that you'll never know, since you seem afraid of them. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
"George M. Middius" wrote in message
Brother Horace the Aphasic said: Unless your values are wrong, and in reality it's you who's the nitwit. Unfortunately, you have proven yourself obdurately resistant to any kind of assault by reality, And yet I still get articles published That's because you have something of merit to say. Let's contrast that with what the Middius crowd have to say. Letsee, what we've got from them is lies, profanity, hatred, and childish name-calling. And you're consistently unable to address your many shortcomings. And you Middius, you're consistently unable to address your many shortcomings. Got a *real* name? Got an address? Got a degree? Got a profession? Got a job? Got a stereo system for which you're willing to name the actual components, by brand and model? Got anything to say about audio? And yet I still get articles published, have had four books published, and have helped to edit (with my name on the title page, yet) a rather large audio-related encyclopedia. Will wonders ever cease? Just for curiosity's sake, how many books and magazine articles have you had published, tweako? Kryptonite! |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
"George M. Middius" wrote in message
Brother Horace the Lowdown wallows in the mud. When all else fails, grasp for straws. Or facts. Not surprising you can't tell the difference. So let's count up your admirers, Clerkie: You've got a pedophile and compulsive liar, a pseudonymous ****-eater who lives in his daddy's basement at the age of 48, an envy-choked sewer cleaner who is a paragon of pathos, and a grown man who's borderline illiterate and who gobbles six dozen pills per day while drooling on his bib. Wow, that's impressive. Too bad none of them can afford to buy your books. ;-) Let's talk about your admirer's, Middius. How many of them are your sockpuppets? How many are guys you had a little private meeting with down at the bath house? |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
"Tom" wrote in message
wrote :-0 Look, Arny!!! I told you!!!! He popped in for a slurpy!!! You seriously need to get a life, Tom. Ever think about audio? |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Arny Krueger wrote:
You seriously need to get a life, Tom. Ever think about audio? That's funny. Is there good money in audio? Richie hasn't done so well. At least he's in the Ozarks where there's plenty o' good ol' boys to service his needs. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
"Tom" wrote in message
ups.com Arny Krueger wrote: You seriously need to get a life, Tom. Ever think about audio? That's funny. Is there good money in audio? Richie hasn't done so well. At least he's in the Ozarks where there's plenty o' good ol' boys to service his needs. Tom, you seem to be obsessed with this person you call Ruichie. Time to get a life! |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Turd-on-a-Rope said: Brother Horace the Lowdown wallows in the mud. When all else fails, grasp for straws. Or facts. Not surprising you can't tell the difference. So let's count up your admirers, Clerkie: You've got a pedophile and compulsive liar, a pseudonymous ****-eater who lives in his daddy's basement at the age of 48, an envy-choked sewer cleaner who is a paragon of pathos, and a grown man who's borderline illiterate and who gobbles six dozen pills per day while drooling on his bib. Wow, that's impressive. Too bad none of them can afford to buy your books. ;-) Let's talk about your admirer's, Middius. My admirer's what, Turdy? You dangled your possessive again. How many are guys you had a little private meeting with down at the bath house? I forgot to mention that most of Ferstler's apologists fantasize about getting ****ed by me. Thanks for the reminder, ClosetCaseBorg. This post reformatted by the Resistance, laboring tirelessly to de-Kroogerize Usenet. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
"Arny Krueger" wrote Exactly. Middius is such a frightened little man that he won't even properly name the make and model of the components in his stereo system. You tried to impress this n.g. by saying that you had recently purchased $15K in equipment and then refused to disclose what the purchase was. Did it make you feel important at the time you said it, Arny ("frightened little man") ? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Question regarding Phantom Power | Pro Audio | |||
Question regarding Phantom Power | Pro Audio | |||
Question regarding Phantom Power | Pro Audio | |||
newbie question - aardvark q10 + external mixer? | Pro Audio | |||
RCA out and Speaker Question in 2004 Ranger Edge Question | Car Audio |