[John Atkinson]

Jenn wrote:
In article hSUAg.4838$Gv.4219@fed1read09,
"ScottW" wrote:
We should test for AIDS

We do.

As an immigrant to the US, I can assure you that
being tested for AIDS (and TB) is a mandatory part
of the process of applying for a "Green Card."

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile

[Jenn]

In article .com,
"John Atkinson" wrote:

Jenn wrote:
In article hSUAg.4838$Gv.4219@fed1read09,
"ScottW" wrote:
We should test for AIDS

We do.

As an immigrant to the US, I can assure you that
being tested for AIDS (and TB) is a mandatory part
of the process of applying for a "Green Card."

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile

Indeed. Perhaps Scott means that EVERYONE should be tested.

--
REMOVE your capo to reply

[ScottW]

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article hSUAg.4838$Gv.4219@fed1read09,
"ScottW" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
...

Here's a question? How can the loony left
be so pro-castro when he imprisons homosexuals
and quarrantines aids victims?

http://www.cubasolidarity.net/cubahol2.html

This is what we should do.

What is what we should do?

We should test for AIDS

We do.

Mandatory.


and effectively
quarrantine victims (prevent further spread).

You want to quarantine over a million people?
BTW, I would have been in favor of that at the very beginning of the
epidemic.

We add 40,000 new cases a year and over 3,000 innocent
children..... the situation only gets worse.

Effective quarantine means prevent transmission.

ScottW

[ScottW]

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article .com,
"John Atkinson" wrote:

Jenn wrote:
In article hSUAg.4838$Gv.4219@fed1read09,
"ScottW" wrote:
We should test for AIDS

We do.

As an immigrant to the US, I can assure you that
being tested for AIDS (and TB) is a mandatory part
of the process of applying for a "Green Card."

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile

Indeed. Perhaps Scott means that EVERYONE should be tested.

Yes. This disease can be stopped.

ScottW

[Jenn]

In article h54Bg.4853$Gv.1422@fed1read09,
"ScottW" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article .com,
"John Atkinson" wrote:

Jenn wrote:
In article hSUAg.4838$Gv.4219@fed1read09,
"ScottW" wrote:
We should test for AIDS

We do.

As an immigrant to the US, I can assure you that
being tested for AIDS (and TB) is a mandatory part
of the process of applying for a "Green Card."

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile

Indeed. Perhaps Scott means that EVERYONE should be tested.

Yes. This disease can be stopped.

ScottW

I could go with that. Who pays for it?

--
REMOVE your capo to reply

[Jenn]

In article G34Bg.4852$Gv.1854@fed1read09,
"ScottW" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article hSUAg.4838$Gv.4219@fed1read09,
"ScottW" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
...

Here's a question? How can the loony left
be so pro-castro when he imprisons homosexuals
and quarrantines aids victims?

http://www.cubasolidarity.net/cubahol2.html

This is what we should do.

What is what we should do?

We should test for AIDS

We do.

Mandatory.


and effectively
quarrantine victims (prevent further spread).

You want to quarantine over a million people?
BTW, I would have been in favor of that at the very beginning of the
epidemic.

We add 40,000 new cases a year and over 3,000 innocent
children..... the situation only gets worse.

You mixing two stats here. In this country, there are about 40,000 new
cases a year among adults and adolescents, and about 50 new cases among
children. Total U.S. cases are about one million adults and adolescents
with HIV and about 9500 children. When speaking of either HIV or AIDS,
there are not 3000 new cases a year among children.

Effective quarantine means prevent transmission.

OK, so you going to quarantine a million people until they die (or until
there is a cure). Some questions:
1. Where?
2. Who pays?
3. And, there will continue to me new cases, of course, even if all
U.S. cases are quarantined. Does your mandatory testing plan include
periodic re-testing? For example, people travel to other countries, and
people from other countries visit here. Do you test Americans when they
return from other countries? Do you test foreign visitors? And because
there is an incubation period, if you do the above, there will still be
spread in the this country, so periodic re-testing of everyone in the
country will be needed.

--
REMOVE your capo to reply

[ScottW]

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article h54Bg.4853$Gv.1422@fed1read09,
"ScottW" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article .com,
"John Atkinson" wrote:

Jenn wrote:
In article hSUAg.4838$Gv.4219@fed1read09,
"ScottW" wrote:
We should test for AIDS

We do.

As an immigrant to the US, I can assure you that
being tested for AIDS (and TB) is a mandatory part
of the process of applying for a "Green Card."

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile

Indeed. Perhaps Scott means that EVERYONE should be tested.

Yes. This disease can be stopped.

ScottW

I could go with that. Who pays for it?

Taxpayers. This is exactly what H&HS if for.

ScottW

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

ScottW wrote:
"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article hSUAg.4838$Gv.4219@fed1read09,
"ScottW" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
...

Here's a question? How can the loony left
be so pro-castro when he imprisons homosexuals
and quarrantines aids victims?

Who in the 'loony left' is a Castro supporter?

I just think we should be able to get good cigars without having to
smuggle them in.

How many countries on Earth is it *illegal* for US citizens to travel
to?

http://www.cubasolidarity.net/cubahol2.html

This is what we should do.

What is what we should do?

We should test for AIDS

We do.

Mandatory.

You start.

While we're at it, let's test for stupidity and isolate really dumb
people so that they cannot procreate and pass their lack of intellect
on to the next generation. That's more dangerous than AIDS in the long
run.

and effectively
quarrantine victims (prevent further spread).

You want to quarantine over a million people?
BTW, I would have been in favor of that at the very beginning of the
epidemic.

We add 40,000 new cases a year and over 3,000 innocent
children..... the situation only gets worse.

Who pays for it? (Not only quarantining, but reimbursement for
property, lost wages [or are you envisioning something similar to a
leper colony where there is no need for money] medical care [although
if you don't give them any, the problem goes away much more quickly,
yes?] security and on and on.

Or maybe we should just tattoo a big scarlet "A" on their forehead.

Also, unless this is a word-wide effort with total commitment from all
nations it will be a futile one. The disease will inevitably get
reintroduced to the US.

And where do you say that you propose putting this quarantined area?

I'd vote for San Diego.

[ScottW]

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article G34Bg.4852$Gv.1854@fed1read09,
"ScottW" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article hSUAg.4838$Gv.4219@fed1read09,
"ScottW" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
...

Here's a question? How can the loony left
be so pro-castro when he imprisons homosexuals
and quarrantines aids victims?

http://www.cubasolidarity.net/cubahol2.html

This is what we should do.

What is what we should do?

We should test for AIDS

We do.

Mandatory.


and effectively
quarrantine victims (prevent further spread).

You want to quarantine over a million people?
BTW, I would have been in favor of that at the very beginning of the
epidemic.

We add 40,000 new cases a year and over 3,000 innocent
children..... the situation only gets worse.

You mixing two stats here. In this country, there are about 40,000 new
cases a year among adults and adolescents, and about 50 new cases among
children. Total U.S. cases are about one million adults and adolescents
with HIV and about 9500 children. When speaking of either HIV or AIDS,
there are not 3000 new cases a year among children.

Adolescents aren't children? But you're right...the mother
to child thing is dramatically reduced but not eliminated.

" The CDC reports that through 2004 there have been a cumulative 8,779 cases
of AIDS in children under 13 years that occurred because of HIV infection
during pregnancy, birth or breastfeeding. However, annual numbers have
fallen dramatically in recent years, and in 2004 only 47 cases of AIDS were
reported in children infected by their mothers. "


Only 47.....

They spend as more time in this report discussing AIDs discrimination
than almost 9,000 innocent children deprived of a normal life.



Effective quarantine means prevent transmission.

OK, so you going to quarantine a million people until they die (or until
there is a cure). Some questions:
1. Where?

A million people are restricted from sexual freedom...period.
If they have a partner or find a partner in the AIDS population
fine..otherwise they can have a normal life.
If they violate these terms then they loose their freedoms.
Incarceration is not required. Technology to track people
is available and is relatively low cost.



2. Who pays?

Taxpayers.

3. And, there will continue to me new cases, of course, even if all
U.S. cases are quarantined.

We already test all legal immigrants. If we get illegal immigration
under control we can get levels down to minimum.

Does your mandatory testing plan include
periodic re-testing?

Yes, as long as necessary.

For example, people travel to other countries, and
people from other countries visit here. Do you test Americans when they
return from other countries?

Yes....depending on where they visit.

Do you test foreign visitors?

Yes.

And because
there is an incubation period, if you do the above, there will still be
spread in the this country, so periodic re-testing of everyone in the
country will be needed.

Thats true... Cubans get tested almost every time they visit a doctor.
As you can see from the data...what we're doing today no longer
is reducing the number of new infections per year.
We are not on a path to eliminate this disease.

ScottW

[George M. Middius]

Jenn said:

Perhaps Scott means that EVERYONE should be tested.

Yes. This disease can be stopped.

I could go with that. Who pays for it?


/TERRIERDORK MODE ON/


The cost should be borne by the ones who are at risk. That way this vital
program will not impact the taxes of the middle class.


/TERRIERDORK MODE OFF/




--

"Christians have to ... work to make the world as loving, just, and supportive as is possible."
A. Krooger, Aug. 2006

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

ScottW wrote:

They spend as more time in this report discussing AIDs discrimination
than almost 9,000 innocent children deprived of a normal life.

That's very sad.

Do they discuss any of the thousands of Iraqi or Afghani children
deprived of a normal life by 500 lb bombs?

[ScottW]

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message
ups.com...

ScottW wrote:
"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article hSUAg.4838$Gv.4219@fed1read09,
"ScottW" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
...

Here's a question? How can the loony left
be so pro-castro when he imprisons homosexuals
and quarrantines aids victims?

Who in the 'loony left' is a Castro supporter?

Oliver Stone, Danny Glover, Harry Belafonte
among others.



I just think we should be able to get good cigars without having to
smuggle them in.

How many countries on Earth is it *illegal* for US citizens to travel
to?

http://www.cubasolidarity.net/cubahol2.html

This is what we should do.

What is what we should do?

We should test for AIDS

We do.

Mandatory.

You start.

Done..years ago and I'm willing anytime asked.


While we're at it, let's test for stupidity and isolate really dumb
people

You start.

ScottW

[Jenn]

In article R55Bg.4863$Gv.3132@fed1read09,
"ScottW" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article G34Bg.4852$Gv.1854@fed1read09,
"ScottW" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article hSUAg.4838$Gv.4219@fed1read09,
"ScottW" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
...

Here's a question? How can the loony left
be so pro-castro when he imprisons homosexuals
and quarrantines aids victims?

http://www.cubasolidarity.net/cubahol2.html

This is what we should do.

What is what we should do?

We should test for AIDS

We do.

Mandatory.


and effectively
quarrantine victims (prevent further spread).

You want to quarantine over a million people?
BTW, I would have been in favor of that at the very beginning of the
epidemic.

We add 40,000 new cases a year and over 3,000 innocent
children..... the situation only gets worse.

You mixing two stats here. In this country, there are about 40,000 new
cases a year among adults and adolescents, and about 50 new cases among
children. Total U.S. cases are about one million adults and adolescents
with HIV and about 9500 children. When speaking of either HIV or AIDS,
there are not 3000 new cases a year among children.

Adolescents aren't children?

Not for these stats.

But you're right...the mother
to child thing is dramatically reduced but not eliminated.

" The CDC reports that through 2004 there have been a cumulative 8,779 cases
of AIDS in children under 13 years that occurred because of HIV infection
during pregnancy, birth or breastfeeding. However, annual numbers have
fallen dramatically in recent years, and in 2004 only 47 cases of AIDS were
reported in children infected by their mothers. "


Only 47.....

Yes, that's tragic, but a big improvement.


They spend as more time in this report discussing AIDs discrimination
than almost 9,000 innocent children deprived of a normal life.

What report is it?




Effective quarantine means prevent transmission.

OK, so you going to quarantine a million people until they die (or until
there is a cure). Some questions:
1. Where?

A million people are restricted from sexual freedom...period.

I see. I thought that you meant physical quarantine as in isolation
from the rest of the population.

If they have a partner or find a partner in the AIDS population
fine..otherwise they can have a normal life.
If they violate these terms then they loose their freedoms.
Incarceration is not required. Technology to track people
is available and is relatively low cost.

You can track people in regards to who they have sex with on a daily
basis? How would the government accomplish that?




2. Who pays?

Taxpayers.

Let's see, at $20 a test (which is far less than you can presently get a
test done for) that would cost about $600 BILLION dollars. If it costs
what it actually presently costs, you can double or triple that. Are
you ready for that?


3. And, there will continue to be new cases, of course, even if all
U.S. cases are quarantined.

We already test all legal immigrants. If we get illegal immigration
under control we can get levels down to minimum.

Does your mandatory testing plan include
periodic re-testing?

Yes, as long as necessary.

At another $600 billion to over $1 TRILLION a pop. What do you think;
once a year? Twice a year?


For example, people travel to other countries, and
people from other countries visit here. Do you test Americans when they
return from other countries?

Yes....depending on where they visit.

Do you test foreign visitors?

Yes.

Goodbye to tourism.


And because
there is an incubation period, if you do the above there will still be
spread in the this country, so periodic re-testing of everyone in the
country will be needed.

Thats true... Cubans get tested almost every time they visit a doctor.
As you can see from the data...what we're doing today no longer
is reducing the number of new infections per year.
We are not on a path to eliminate this disease.

I agree. I'm just fleshing out your idea here.

ScottW

--
REMOVE your capo to reply

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

ScottW wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message
ups.com...

ScottW wrote:
"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article hSUAg.4838$Gv.4219@fed1read09,
"ScottW" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
...

Here's a question? How can the loony left
be so pro-castro when he imprisons homosexuals
and quarrantines aids victims?

Who in the 'loony left' is a Castro supporter?

Oliver Stone, Danny Glover, Harry Belafonte
among others.

So these three, plus a few more, represent all of the left. And, BTW,
can you cite their support?

After you do, let's look at Pat Robertson and the others who represent
*your* loony right views, shall we?

We should test for AIDS

We do.

Mandatory.

You start.

Done..years ago and I'm willing anytime asked.

What were you worried about?

While we're at it, let's test for stupidity and isolate really dumb
people

You start.

Done, years ago. Want to place bets on where we are relative to one
another?

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

Jenn wrote:
In article R55Bg.4863$Gv.3132@fed1read09,
"ScottW" wrote:

And because
there is an incubation period, if you do the above there will still be
spread in the this country, so periodic re-testing of everyone in the
country will be needed.

Thats true... Cubans get tested almost every time they visit a doctor.
As you can see from the data...what we're doing today no longer
is reducing the number of new infections per year.
We are not on a path to eliminate this disease.

I agree. I'm just fleshing out your idea here.

Of course sex education, the availability of prophylactics, how drug
addicts are treated (or not) and much else that this administration
(and the right in general) are against could have a pretty large
impact...

[Clyde Slick]

"ScottW" wrote in message
news:%aUAg.4832$Gv.2370@fed1read09...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
. ..

"ScottW" wrote in message
ups.com...

Clyde Slick wrote:
"ScottW" wrote in message

The Supreme Court protects the rights and freedoms of religion.
What it prevents, is the the government forcing of
religion down people's throats,

Didn't stop the public call to prayer in Dearborn.
Thats about as down your throat as I can imagine.



ARe you talking about a call to
prayer from a mosque?
That is not a governmental activity.

Neither is public school actually..or at least
it isn't supposed to be.


Damn right it is public!!!!!!!!!!!!
You are equating public schools with a religious place of worship??




Its akin to church bells ringing.

Have you heard the call? Them ain't bells.


Its the same principle, you just don't
like the music. Just imagiine
how the Gitmo prisoners feel about AC/DC.




--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDem

[Clyde Slick]

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message
ups.com...

ScottW wrote:
"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article hSUAg.4838$Gv.4219@fed1read09,
"ScottW" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
...

Here's a question? How can the loony left
be so pro-castro when he imprisons homosexuals
and quarrantines aids victims?

Who in the 'loony left' is a Castro supporter?

I just think we should be able to get good cigars without having to
smuggle them in.

How many countries on Earth is it *illegal* for US citizens to travel
to?

http://www.cubasolidarity.net/cubahol2.html

This is what we should do.

What is what we should do?

We should test for AIDS

We do.

Mandatory.

You start.

While we're at it, let's test for stupidity and isolate really dumb
people so that they cannot procreate and pass their lack of intellect
on to the next generation. That's more dangerous than AIDS in the long
run.

and effectively
quarrantine victims (prevent further spread).

You want to quarantine over a million people?
BTW, I would have been in favor of that at the very beginning of the
epidemic.

We add 40,000 new cases a year and over 3,000 innocent
children..... the situation only gets worse.

Who pays for it? (Not only quarantining, but reimbursement for
property, lost wages [or are you envisioning something similar to a
leper colony where there is no need for money] medical care [although
if you don't give them any, the problem goes away much more quickly,
yes?] security and on and on.

Or maybe we should just tattoo a big scarlet "A" on their forehead.

Also, unless this is a word-wide effort with total commitment from all
nations it will be a futile one. The disease will inevitably get
reintroduced to the US.

And where do you say that you propose putting this quarantined area?

I'd vote for San Diego.




--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDem

[Jenn]

ScottW wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message
ups.com...

ScottW wrote:
"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article hSUAg.4838$Gv.4219@fed1read09,
"ScottW" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
..
.

Here's a question? How can the loony left
be so pro-castro when he imprisons homosexuals
and quarrantines aids victims?

Are you implying that the Right is in favor of imprisoning homosexuals?

--
REMOVE your capo to reply

[Clyde Slick]

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message
ups.com...

Who in the 'loony left' is a Castro supporter?


Cindy Sheehan



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDem

[Clyde Slick]

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message
ps.com...

ScottW wrote:

They spend as more time in this report discussing AIDs discrimination
than almost 9,000 innocent children deprived of a normal life.

That's very sad.

Do they discuss any of the thousands of Iraqi or Afghani children
deprived of a normal life by 500 lb bombs?


I didn't know that IED's weighed that much.



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDem

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

Clyde Slick wrote:
"ScottW" wrote in message
news:%aUAg.4832$Gv.2370@fed1read09...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
. ..

"ScottW" wrote in message
ups.com...

Clyde Slick wrote:
"ScottW" wrote in message

The Supreme Court protects the rights and freedoms of religion.
What it prevents, is the the government forcing of
religion down people's throats,

Didn't stop the public call to prayer in Dearborn.
Thats about as down your throat as I can imagine.

ARe you talking about a call to
prayer from a mosque?
That is not a governmental activity.

Neither is public school actually..or at least
it isn't supposed to be.

Damn right it is public!!!!!!!!!!!!
You are equating public schools with a religious place of worship??

It would appear that way...

Its akin to church bells ringing.

Have you heard the call? Them ain't bells.

Duh. No anti-Muslim sentiments here.

Its the same principle, you just don't
like the music. Just imagiine
how the Gitmo prisoners feel about AC/DC.

Can it be that we actually agree on something?

You're a closet liberal...:-)

[Clyde Slick]

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message
oups.com...

Clyde Slick wrote:
"ScottW" wrote in message
news:%aUAg.4832$Gv.2370@fed1read09...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
. ..

"ScottW" wrote in message
ups.com...

Clyde Slick wrote:
"ScottW" wrote in message

The Supreme Court protects the rights and freedoms of religion.
What it prevents, is the the government forcing of
religion down people's throats,

Didn't stop the public call to prayer in Dearborn.
Thats about as down your throat as I can imagine.

ARe you talking about a call to
prayer from a mosque?
That is not a governmental activity.

Neither is public school actually..or at least
it isn't supposed to be.

Damn right it is public!!!!!!!!!!!!
You are equating public schools with a religious place of worship??

It would appear that way...

Its akin to church bells ringing.

Have you heard the call? Them ain't bells.

Duh. No anti-Muslim sentiments here.

Its the same principle, you just don't
like the music. Just imagiine
how the Gitmo prisoners feel about AC/DC.

Can it be that we actually agree on something?

You're a closet liberal...:-)


I used to be a liberal, "at least" the old style
liberal that is fast becoming no more, soon
to be extinct when Lieberman goes down.
I am still a registered Democrat.
I don't vote for many of them.
Bush was the first Rep I ever voted for, for President.
Carter was the last Dem I voter for, for President.
I tended to vote independent, John ANderson,'Ross Perot the first time.
'the second time Perot ran I voted for another candidate with big ears,
I wrote in Mickey Mouse.
Here is an enigma: I voted for the Rep governor, Erlich, and also for the
lib Dem senator Mikulski, I like her, but I always voted against the
lib Dem Senator Sabanes, who is a phoney.
In the Dem Pres primary, I voted for Rev. Al. IF he
won the nomination, I would actually consider him.
He showed up the rest of the Democratics as being quite ignorant.
I also think he is really not as much of a dove as he says, if **** happened
on his watch, he wouldn't take it, and he would retaliate.Its his nature.
It tend to like fighters.

So, I'm not so easy to peg.



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDem

[Joe]

On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 17:16:35 -0400, George M. Middius cmndr
[underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote:

:
:
:
:Gather thy albums, all ye faithful followers of old-time audio. A new
:sermon is ready to shatter your ice palace of dreams.
:
: the LP format. Why you want to deify it escapes me.
:
:And God looked down into the Hive, and lo, there was the Krooborg fishing
:in the toilet again. And God spake unto Mr. ****, and He bade him clean
:his mouth before posting. And the Krooborg cowered, and quaked, and...
:took another bite of ****. So much for religious faith. ;-)

Why am I not shocked to see George at the center of another
flame? How many years have you had this little fued going
there George? Even the Hatfields and McCoys took a break
after a decade or so. I guess you enjoy the safety of
taking pot shots over the net where no one can respond with
anything but electrons arranged in a certain way. That's
why I think the internet is home for the biggest whiners on
earth. People like you thrive in the seclusion of living
and posting from under a rock somewhere without any
consequence for their actions. It's CB radio all over
again. Rednecks bashing each other from the safety of their
hideout on every channel - ain't the internet great?

Yes I know I'm here doing the same thing but I don't do it
as a full time hobby. It isn't my life. I've actually been
doing other things for the past 10 years. George has been
right here all along haven't you George? What a joke. But
hey I'm not "out". That's a perfectly good reason to
discount what I have to say according to the half baked
weirdos that populate these groups.

Haven't you guys noticed that the audiophile fad has been
over for about a decade now? You're the only ones left that
think bashing someone else over their choice of overpriced
equipment is cool and enjoyable. Get a life guys. You
really need one. You know I'm right. When was the last
time you saw the sun George? Are their mushrooms growing on
your keyboard? Is there a Mrs. Middius? Do you have time
for any other hobbies besides boring flame wars?

[Joe]

On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 18:13:58 -0400, George M. Middius cmndr
[underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote:

:Yep, it's creepy.

Yeah everyone should be like you right George? Hide in your
basement and crank up the stereo until you can't hear
anything from the real world, post flames in this ng and put
down everyone who isn't just like you. Nothing creepy about
that is there George? Can you imagine a whole country
filled with people just like you? A whole world maybe? At
least communicable diseases would cease to exist unless they
adapted so they could spread over the internet.

I'll stop picking on you now George. I shouldn't have
singled you out. This whole ng is full of weirdos like you.
You're just one I remember from 10 years ago and you're
still here doing the same thing you were back then. Nothing
creepy about that. No sir.

[Joe]

On Tue, 1 Aug 2006 19:19:12 -0400, "Clyde Slick"
wrote:

:he says 'godly dominion', but what he really means is a human dominion by
:Christian zealots.

Do you people realize how hateful you sound? So much for
the liberal ideal of tolerance. You are just as intolerant
as anyone you might be attempting to put down. You are just
as much of a zealot to your point of view.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

Joe wrote:
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006 19:19:12 -0400, "Clyde Slick"
wrote:

:he says 'godly dominion', but what he really means is a human dominion by
:Christian zealots.

Do you people realize how hateful you sound? So much for
the liberal ideal of tolerance.

Is your argument that someone should tolerate falling under the
dominion of (a dictatorship, a group of religious zealots, communism,
whatever)?

If so, then you do not understand the word, 'liberal.'

If not, then what's your point?

[paul packer]

On 6 Aug 2006 23:24:36 -0700, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:


Joe wrote:
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006 19:19:12 -0400, "Clyde Slick"
wrote:

:he says 'godly dominion', but what he really means is a human dominion by
:Christian zealots.

Do you people realize how hateful you sound? So much for
the liberal ideal of tolerance.

Is your argument that someone should tolerate falling under the
dominion of (a dictatorship, a group of religious zealots, communism,
whatever)?

Are you falling under such a dictatorship? I see no evidence of it.
Indeed, I see only evidence of people, particularly young people,
becoming more 'liberal' every day.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

paul packer wrote:
On 6 Aug 2006 23:24:36 -0700, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:


Joe wrote:
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006 19:19:12 -0400, "Clyde Slick"
wrote:

:he says 'godly dominion', but what he really means is a human dominion by
:Christian zealots.

Do you people realize how hateful you sound? So much for
the liberal ideal of tolerance.

Is your argument that someone should tolerate falling under the
dominion of (a dictatorship, a group of religious zealots, communism,
whatever)?

Are you falling under such a dictatorship? I see no evidence of it.
Indeed, I see only evidence of people, particularly young people,
becoming more 'liberal' every day.

Begs the question. Clyde was called 'hateful.' That was in response to
his reaction to a statement, not an existing condition.

I repeat: should liberals 'tolerate' falling under the dominion of
something? Should liberals also 'tolerate' attacks on the separation of
Church and State, for example?

[Clyde Slick]

"Joe" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006 19:19:12 -0400, "Clyde Slick"
wrote:

:he says 'godly dominion', but what he really means is a human dominion by
:Christian zealots.

Do you people realize how hateful you sound? So much for
the liberal ideal of tolerance. You are just as intolerant
as anyone you might be attempting to put down. You are just
as much of a zealot to your point of view.

What, exactly, are you babbling about?
Tell me, in this godly dominion, who goes
to heaven, and who does not? Where do the Muslims,
Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, agnostics and atheists end up?
Now, start telling me more about tolerance.



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

[Clyde Slick]

"paul packer" wrote in message
...
On 6 Aug 2006 23:24:36 -0700, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:


Joe wrote:
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006 19:19:12 -0400, "Clyde Slick"
wrote:

:he says 'godly dominion', but what he really means is a human dominion
by
:Christian zealots.

Do you people realize how hateful you sound? So much for
the liberal ideal of tolerance.

Is your argument that someone should tolerate falling under the
dominion of (a dictatorship, a group of religious zealots, communism,
whatever)?

Are you falling under such a dictatorship? I see no evidence of it.
Indeed, I see only evidence of people, particularly young people,
becoming more 'liberal' every day.


Nah, they still don't have the 60's beat.



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

ScottW wrote:

Damn that freedom of speech can be a real bitch, can't it?

Not at all.

Someone declaring 'jihad' can say so or write so whenever they wish.

And we all get to comment on it too.

Now ain't *that* a bitch?

Moron.