Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#81
|
|||
|
|||
Mickey's big admission
Arny Krueger wrote: "paul packer" wrote in message Bravo, Ludovic. A spot-on posting. Only if your IQ is low enough to not spot the logical flaws, and you have no practical background in the topic so you can't spot the factual errors. Of course no-one in the ABX camp will applaud it, or likely even read it through, but that's their loss. It takes a lot of cups of coffee to retain consciousness while reading Ludovic's highly repetitive and bogus posts. Keep repeating common sense and who knows, maybe one day it will be common. Paul, you just flunked another IQ test. Maybe there is some chemical that will energize your synapses to the point where bilge like Ludovic's will start wrinkling your nose. Ask Paul Domer, in the past he's bragged about his self-experimentation along these lines. Of course, we're talking Paul Dormer, so many of us know that none of his experiments ever bore what most would call fruit. __________________________________________________ ______ Paul Packer said: Bravo, Ludovic. A spot-on posting. Arny answered: Only if your IQ is low enough to not spot the logical flaws, and you have no practical background in the topic so you can't spot the factual errors. Arny, how about a short list of these "logical flaws" and "factual errors". Don't you at all care to educate your readers by lucid examples rather than bare assertions? . And while you're at it: when will you come up with that one reference to an ABX "test" published in any journal or mag. with a positive outcome: "Yes , we heard the difference". You had 4 decades so far to do it, Still counting. Ludovic Mirabel How did someone called Paul Dormer sin against you? Just curious. |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
Mickey's big admission
wrote in message
oups.com Arny, how about a short list of these "logical flaws" and "factual errors". Listing them for the zillionth time would be a cosmic waste of my time, just like they were the last zillion times I did it, and the last zillion times that people like Pinkerton and Sullivan did it. |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
Mickey's big admission
wrote in message
nk.net Why would anyone applaud Ludo lies? Good question for people like Morein and Packer who do things like this all the time. |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
Mickey's big admission
On 4 Nov 2005 16:15:14 -0800, wrote:
How did someone called Paul Dormer sin against you? Just curious. He didn't. Arnie just doesn't like Pauls. :-) |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
The case for ABX
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005 08:54:32 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote: You've got your nose how far up Morien's and Middius' schtick and you don't say *what* about all of their name-calling? Arnie, remember when you were at school, and someone played a trick on you, and you didn't think it was funny, ot just didn't get it, and therefore didn't laugh but rather shouted and grizzled and stamped your feet, and in the end went off to report everyone to the vice principal? Remember that? And remember how the next day it was worse, that the kids teased you twice as much, and there were twice as many kids? Remember that? And you still didn't get why everyone was picking on you and laughing, so you went off to tell the vice principal again? Does that all ring a bell? Well, it's still happening, and for the same reason. |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
The case for ABX
"paul packer" wrote in message
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005 08:54:32 -0500, "Arny Krueger" wrote: You've got your nose how far up Morien's and Middius' schtick and you don't say *what* about all of their name-calling? Arnie, remember when you were at school, and someone played a trick on you, and you didn't think it was funny, ot just didn't get it, and therefore didn't laugh but rather shouted and grizzled and stamped your feet, and in the end went off to report everyone to the vice principal? Remember that? Never happened. And remember how the next day it was worse, that the kids teased you twice as much, and there were twice as many kids? Remember that? And you still didn't get why everyone was picking on you and laughing, so you went off to tell the vice principal again? Does that all ring a bell? Well, it's still happening, and for the same reason. Not even a good fantasy, let alone the truth. You're just a delusional, posturing, dissembling hypocrite, Paul. |
#87
|
|||
|
|||
Mickey's big admission
Arny Krueger wrote: wrote in message oups.com Arny, how about a short list of these "logical flaws" and "factual errors". Listing them for the zillionth time would be a cosmic waste of my time, just like they were the last zillion times I did it, and the last zillion times that people like Pinkerton and Sullivan did it. __________________________________________________ __ I asked: Arny, how about a short list of these "logical flaws" and "factual errors". Arny answered: Listing them for the zillionth time would be a cosmic waste of my time, just like they were the last zillion times I did it, and the last zillion times that people like Pinkerton and Sullivan did it. Arny, Arny, do you really think that this kind of silliness works? Or that it makes you look anything but what you are in this instance (and not a few others)- a cheap card sharper? Do you think that shouting "zillions" will befuddle everyone and let you go scot free? Never mind "zillions". Just quote one or two . No time Arny? Too busy to write message after message to several forums till suddenly the clock rings and Arny has to run in case he gets late for dinner. As for your pals: Last contribution from Pinkerton was to cut my posting into paragraphs and add "You're a lying ****bag" as his only comment at the end of each one. By your friends you'll know them! Remember:I did not hang Pinkerton around your neck. You're calling on him to help. Sullivan's final contribution to "zillions" was to say that he killfiles me.. A great help to you in listing my "logical and factual errors". By the way: you omitted the final paragraph of my short message: "And while you're at it: when will you come up with that one reference to an ABX "test" published in any journal or mag. with a positive outcome: "Yes , we heard the difference". You had 4 decades so far to do it, Still counting" By a strange coincidence it is exactly the same point that sent Pinkerton into one of his British soccer hooligan fits and started Sullivan' kilfiling me. Regards. Better luck next time.. Ludovic Mirabel |
#88
|
|||
|
|||
The case for ABX
On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 06:38:59 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote: You're just a delusional, posturing, dissembling hypocrite, Paul. So I'm not on your Christmas list again this year? |
#89
|
|||
|
|||
The case for ABX
paul packer said to The Big ****: So I'm not on your Christmas list again this year? You do not want to know what Arnii gives his "friends" for Xmas. Trust me. |
#90
|
|||
|
|||
Mickey's big admission
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005 22:23:38 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote: wrote in message ink.net Why would anyone applaud Ludo lies? Good question for people like Morein and Packer who do things like this all the time. Does my ability to recognise a simple axiom bother you? |
#91
|
|||
|
|||
The case for ABX
"paul packer" wrote in message ... On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 06:38:59 -0500, "Arny Krueger" wrote: You're just a delusional, posturing, dissembling hypocrite, Paul. So I'm not on your Christmas list again this year? No XMas turds for you, lucky guy, you will have to do with a lump of coal. |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
The case for ABX
On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 19:16:25 -0500, George M. Middius cmndr
[underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote: paul packer said to The Big ****: So I'm not on your Christmas list again this year? You do not want to know what Arnii gives his "friends" for Xmas. Trust me. Apparently it's not something I have to worry about. |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
Mickey's big admission
Arny Krueger wrote: wrote in message nk.net Why would anyone applaud Ludo lies? Good question for people like Morein and Packer who do things like this all the time. I know you're desperate for an answer. But must you follow the lead of the stupidest in your camp slandering and insulting when at a loss? What a shameful way to run away from an argument. Have you really no shame? Ludovic Mirabel |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
Mickey's big admission
wrote in message oups.com... : : Arny Krueger wrote: : wrote in message : nk.net : : : Why would anyone applaud Ludo lies? : : Good question for people like Morein and Packer who do : things like this all the time. : : I know you're desperate for an answer. But must you : follow the lead of the stupidest in your camp slandering and insulting : when at a loss? What a shameful way to run away from an argument. : Have you really no shame? : Ludovic Mirabel : heh, exchange of arguments quickly eroding to s & i can be seen on a day to day basis here on RAO ;-) here's three things you should all have found out, observing women, stricktly scientificcally speaking humour saves the day (what it does for nights - sorry, sss) adapt don't worry about winning or projected ego, just enjoy the game ... this works in a surprising lot of scenarios, guys. as i mentioned before, life's circumstances set you up with several shaped perceptive paths, cognitive stances, modes of thought. these can be likened to resonant circuits. that is, when confronted with some situation, it 'rings a bell', sets a 'response mode' or scenario into action. "..must you follow the lead..?" unless you place your actions and thoughts in the focus of consciousness, yes ! sorta like Pavlov old habits die hard, new habits soon became second nature. 'ask dr.' Rudy :-) |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
Mickey's big admission
wrote in message oups.com... Arny Krueger wrote: wrote in message nk.net Why would anyone applaud Ludo lies? Good question for people like Morein and Packer who do things like this all the time. I know you're desperate for an answer. But must you follow the lead of the stupidest in your camp slandering and insulting when at a loss? What a shameful way to run away from an argument. Have you really no shame? Ludovic Mirabel It's clear you don't have ny shame, or any long term memory. |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
Mickey's big admission
On Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:59:07 +0100, "Ruud Broens"
wrote: heh, exchange of arguments quickly eroding to s & i can be seen on a day to day basis here on RAO ;-) here's three things you should all have found out, observing women, stricktly scientificcally speaking humour saves the day (what it does for nights - sorry, sss) adapt don't worry about winning or projected ego, just enjoy the game .. this works in a surprising lot of scenarios, guys. as i mentioned before, life's circumstances set you up with several shaped perceptive paths, cognitive stances, modes of thought. these can be likened to resonant circuits. that is, when confronted with some situation, it 'rings a bell', sets a 'response mode' or scenario into action. "..must you follow the lead..?" unless you place your actions and thoughts in the focus of consciousness, yes ! sorta like Pavlov old habits die hard, new habits soon became second nature. 'ask dr.' Rudy :-) This seems like a potentially interesting post which however means nothing to me. Why don't you try rephrasing, Ruud? |
#97
|
|||
|
|||
Mickey's big admission
In , paul packer wrote :
On Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:59:07 +0100, "Ruud Broens" wrote: heh, exchange of arguments quickly eroding to s & i can be seen on a day to day basis here on RAO ;-) here's three things you should all have found out, observing women, stricktly scientificcally speaking humour saves the day (what it does for nights - sorry, sss) adapt don't worry about winning or projected ego, just enjoy the game .. this works in a surprising lot of scenarios, guys. as i mentioned before, life's circumstances set you up with several shaped perceptive paths, cognitive stances, modes of thought. these can be likened to resonant circuits. that is, when confronted with some situation, it 'rings a bell', sets a 'response mode' or scenario into action. "..must you follow the lead..?" unless you place your actions and thoughts in the focus of consciousness, yes ! sorta like Pavlov old habits die hard, new habits soon became second nature. 'ask dr.' Rudy :-) This seems like a potentially interesting post which however means nothing to me. Why don't you try rephrasing, Ruud? :-( |
#98
|
|||
|
|||
Mickey's big admission
"Lionel" wrote in message ... : In , paul packer wrote : : : On Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:59:07 +0100, "Ruud Broens" : wrote: : : : heh, exchange of arguments quickly eroding to s & i : can be seen on a day to day basis here on RAO ;-) : : here's three things you should all have found out, : observing women, : stricktly scientificcally speaking : : humour saves the day (what it does for nights - sorry, sss) : : adapt : : don't worry about winning or projected ego, : just enjoy the game : : .. this works in a surprising lot of scenarios, guys. : : as i mentioned before, life's circumstances set you up : with several shaped perceptive paths, cognitive stances, : modes of thought. these can be likened to resonant circuits. : that is, when confronted with some situation, it 'rings a bell', : sets a 'response mode' or scenario into action. : : "..must you follow the lead..?" : : unless you place your actions and thoughts in the focus of : consciousness, yes ! sorta like Pavlov : old habits die hard, new habits soon became second nature. : : 'ask dr.' Rudy : :-) : : This seems like a potentially interesting post which however means : nothing to me. Why don't you try rephrasing, Ruud? : : :-( : uh, Paul, have to agree with Lionel there :-) we delegate plenty to routine, even in cases it's not necessary or the best way to go .. all wrapped up in one sentence now. Rudy |
#99
|
|||
|
|||
Mickey's big admission
: we delegate plenty to routine, even in cases it's not necessary or : the best way to go .. all wrapped up in one sentence now. : Rudy : -----------------the insult routine in action---- example (this week on abse): Diesel Boat Engine Sound "NunYa Bidness" wrote in message ... On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 11:11:44 +1100, "Phil Allison" Gave us: "Rich, Under the Affluence" Phil Allison wrote: ** Given that you are a tedious ****** ...... And since all you do is bitch, gripe, complain, grouse, pule, whine, snivel, and cast aspersions, I'm going to go out of character he *PLONK* ** Next time, dont be so long winded about it. A simple "bye" will do. You could be a bit more retarded, but not today. "Phil Allison" wrote in message ... "mungo" Thank you all for your helpful tips and advice, I was directed to this news group and told the people would be helpful and friendly???. ** Your ****wit query was very misguided. Try " alt.scale-model-boat.reptiles.******s " My 20 years plus personal experience with RC boats and RC boat clubs / associations has given me great insight into the prevailing mindset. ....... Phil In what way was my query misguided you ****ing anal retarded cum gargling cock jockey?????? Thanks again ............................. Out of control Mungo had nothing wrong to say until you insulted hiim first. It was a rapid downhill spiral after that. To that end, welcome to the plonk file. Rant as much as you wish. I won't be listening to your foul tirades anymore. Nothing against your countrymen, but *you* are an Aushole. "Phil Allison" wrote in message ... "Oppie" Phil - and I will continue to top post (just as a matter of preference) to annyoy you G --------:-) --------:-) |
#101
|
|||
|
|||
Mickey's big admission
|
#102
|
|||
|
|||
Mickey's big admission
"Signal" wrote in message ... " emitted : Arny Krueger wrote: "paul packer" wrote in message Bravo, Ludovic. A spot-on posting. Only if your IQ is low enough to not spot the logical flaws, and you have no practical background in the topic so you can't spot the factual errors. Of course no-one in the ABX camp will applaud it, or likely even read it through, but that's their loss. It takes a lot of cups of coffee to retain consciousness while reading Ludovic's highly repetitive and bogus posts. Keep repeating common sense and who knows, maybe one day it will be common. Paul, you just flunked another IQ test. Maybe there is some chemical that will energize your synapses to the point where bilge like Ludovic's will start wrinkling your nose. Ask Paul Domer, in the past he's bragged about his self-experimentation along these lines. Of course, we're talking Paul Dormer, so many of us know that none of his experiments ever bore what most would call fruit. ________________________________________________ ________ Paul Packer said: Bravo, Ludovic. A spot-on posting. Arny answered: Only if your IQ is low enough to not spot the logical flaws, and you have no practical background in the topic so you can't spot the factual errors. Arny, how about a short list of these "logical flaws" and "factual errors". Don't you at all care to educate your readers by lucid examples rather than bare assertions? . And while you're at it: when will you come up with that one reference to an ABX "test" published in any journal or mag. with a positive outcome: "Yes , we heard the difference". You had 4 decades so far to do it, Still counting. Ludovic Mirabel How did someone called Paul Dormer sin against you? Just curious. You should know by now - it takes just one disagreement with Krueger for him to harbour a lifelong grudge you. If you disagree twice, that's grounds for a ceaseless vendetta... fa****a... whetever people of his religious order call it. Too bad Arny isn't Amish. Then we would have the benefit of his shunning us. |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
Mickey's big admission
"Signal" wrote in message ... "Clyde Slick" emitted : You should know by now - it takes just one disagreement with Krueger for him to harbour a lifelong grudge you. If you disagree twice, that's grounds for a ceaseless vendetta... fa****a... whetever people of his religious order call it. Too bad Arny isn't Amish. Then we would have the benefit of his shunning us. I don't know hardly nothin' about the Amish. Can you explain this to me please? :-) Similar to Mennonites, but stricter. Ethnic German offshoot of Christians. Fundamentalist, sort of, but not like Baptist type Fudamnetalists Old fashioned They reject using electricity and automobiles, Simple and unadorned clothing. The antithesis of a 'blig bling' society. They practice shunning those of their own order who are considered heretics. http://www.religioustolerance.org/amish1.htm http://mb-soft.com/believe/txn/amish.htm http://www.amish.net/default.asp http://ohioline.osu.edu/hyg-fact/5000/5251.html |
#104
|
|||
|
|||
Mickey's big admission
"Signal" wrote in message ... "George M. Middius" : Clyde Slick said to duh-Mikey: you still haven't figure out that it's NOT about science. Nothing about duh-Mikey is remotely related to real science. He and Arnii traffic in some kind of traveling-medicine-show version of sicciccneneece. That's right. They've been peddling snake oil for years. yeah, but is their snake oil better or worse or no different forom anyone else's? Have you blind tested it? Prove it! |
#105
|
|||
|
|||
Mickey's big admission
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:40:47 +0100, "Ruud Broens"
wrote: : we delegate plenty to routine, even in cases it's not necessary or : the best way to go .. all wrapped up in one sentence now. : Rudy : -----------------the insult routine in action---- example (this week on abse): Diesel Boat Engine Sound "NunYa Bidness" wrote in message .. . On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 11:11:44 +1100, "Phil Allison" Gave us: "Rich, Under the Affluence" Phil Allison wrote: ** Given that you are a tedious ****** ...... And since all you do is bitch, gripe, complain, grouse, pule, whine, snivel, and cast aspersions, I'm going to go out of character he *PLONK* ** Next time, dont be so long winded about it. A simple "bye" will do. You could be a bit more retarded, but not today. "Phil Allison" wrote in message ... "mungo" Thank you all for your helpful tips and advice, I was directed to this news group and told the people would be helpful and friendly???. ** Your ****wit query was very misguided. Try " alt.scale-model-boat.reptiles.******s " My 20 years plus personal experience with RC boats and RC boat clubs / associations has given me great insight into the prevailing mindset. ....... Phil In what way was my query misguided you ****ing anal retarded cum gargling cock jockey?????? Thanks again ............................ Out of control Mungo had nothing wrong to say until you insulted hiim first. It was a rapid downhill spiral after that. To that end, welcome to the plonk file. Rant as much as you wish. I won't be listening to your foul tirades anymore. Nothing against your countrymen, but *you* are an Aushole. "Phil Allison" wrote in message ... Check aus.hi-fi for info on Phil Allison. A few message headers from Phil should tell you all you need to know. But remember while reading to hold a cross in front of you. |
#106
|
|||
|
|||
Mickey's big admission
Clyde Slick wrote: "Signal" wrote in message ... " emitted : Arny Krueger wrote: "paul packer" wrote in message Bravo, Ludovic. A spot-on posting. Only if your IQ is low enough to not spot the logical flaws, and you have no practical background in the topic so you can't spot the factual errors. Of course no-one in the ABX camp will applaud it, or likely even read it through, but that's their loss. It takes a lot of cups of coffee to retain consciousness while reading Ludovic's highly repetitive and bogus posts. Keep repeating common sense and who knows, maybe one day it will be common. Paul, you just flunked another IQ test. Maybe there is some chemical that will energize your synapses to the point where bilge like Ludovic's will start wrinkling your nose. Ask Paul Domer, in the past he's bragged about his self-experimentation along these lines. Of course, we're talking Paul Dormer, so many of us know that none of his experiments ever bore what most would call fruit. ________________________________________________ ________ Paul Packer said: Bravo, Ludovic. A spot-on posting. Arny answered: Only if your IQ is low enough to not spot the logical flaws, and you have no practical background in the topic so you can't spot the factual errors. Arny, how about a short list of these "logical flaws" and "factual errors". Don't you at all care to educate your readers by lucid examples rather than bare assertions? . And while you're at it: when will you come up with that one reference to an ABX "test" published in any journal or mag. with a positive outcome: "Yes , we heard the difference". You had 4 decades so far to do it, Still counting. Ludovic Mirabel How did someone called Paul Dormer sin against you? Just curious. You should know by now - it takes just one disagreement with Krueger for him to harbour a lifelong grudge you. If you disagree twice, that's grounds for a ceaseless vendetta... fa****a... whetever people of his religious order call it. __________________________________________________ Clyde Slick wrote: Too bad Arny isn't Amish. Then we would have the benefit of his shunning us. But he is shunning... At least he is shunning any argument with me., He no longer makes an effort to discuss or argue. He just condemns my iniquity, the iniquity of the damned who dare to disagree with him.. He "needs coffee to stay awake reading my bilge". It seems the bilge got in his eye and blinded him because he does not see fit to flesh out his fatwa and pick a particularly bilgy sentence or two of mine. Just to show the world the justice of his cause. He knows of "zillions" of my logical and factual errors but he can not spare the time to list one or two examples..Instead he defers to Pinkerton and Sullivan who he says annihilated me (still no details) and finally appoints his clown-prince as his intellectual mouthpiece-oracle.. And still not one reference to validation of ABX as a method to distinguish between audio components playing music. Just to fall in with his goading I republished two days ago my left-right method of comparing components that he said made him "laugh himself sick" once in the past. I hoped to hear the brilliant expose and triumphant haha at the end - but no- Arny stays silent as a tomb . No laughs. Just bad temper. Ludovic Mirabel |
#107
|
|||
|
|||
Mickey's big admission
PD said: Ask Paul Domer, in the past he's bragged about his self-experimentation along these lines. Of course, we're talking Paul Dormer, so many of us know that none of his experiments ever bore what most would call fruit. Anybody got a clue what the nonce is going on about here? Arnii needs to be spanked again, and he's reaching out to you. .. .. .. |
#108
|
|||
|
|||
Mickey's big admission
Clyde Slick said: Nothing about duh-Mikey is remotely related to real science. He and Arnii traffic in some kind of traveling-medicine-show version of sicciccneneece. That's right. They've been peddling snake oil for years. yeah, but is their snake oil better or worse or no different forom anyone else's? Have you blind tested it? Prove it! Evidence suggests that Normals should avoid it at all costs. Look what it did to duh-Mikey and Arnii Krooborg. One is a blithering idiot and the other is a paranoid religious fanatic and pathological liar. .. .. .. |
#109
|
|||
|
|||
Mickey's big admission
|
#110
|
|||
|
|||
Mickey's big admission
Sander deWaal said: Ill Phalluson actually knows a thing or two about audio electronics, but he rarely shares his knowledge. Just an endless stream of non-original, repetitive insults. That's typical of what you pinheads say when faced with real genius, Slick. It amazes me that you tweakos are terrified of taking a blind test of your precious tweako-freako gear. You know you'll fail, and Arnii Krooger is very smart. Get a life. Ignored post, note. .. .. .. |
#111
|
|||
|
|||
Mickey's big admission
George "Micro" Middius a ecrit:
Sander deWaal said: Ill Phalluson actually knows a thing or two about audio electronics, but he rarely shares his knowledge. Just an endless stream of non-original, repetitive insults. That's typical of what you pinheads say when faced with real genius, Slick. It amazes me that you tweakos are terrified of taking a blind test of your precious tweako-freako gear. You know you'll fail, and Arnii Krooger is very smart. Get a life. Ah, "George", it is hurt my eyeballs to much from laugh :-) Does I reminded you off the "connoisseurs de vin" which you always writes about, eh? Ignored post, note. Love you two, sweetie :-) -- "Audio as a serious hobby is going down the tubes." - Howard Ferstler, 25/4/2005 |
#112
|
|||
|
|||
Mickey's big admission
wrote in message ups.com... wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Arny Krueger wrote: wrote in message nk.net Why would anyone applaud Ludo lies? Good question for people like Morein and Packer who do things like this all the time. I know you're desperate for an answer. But must you follow the lead of the stupidest in your camp slandering and insulting when at a loss? What a shameful way to run away from an argument. Have you really no shame? Ludovic Mirabel It's clear you don't have ny shame, or any long term memory. It seems Arny refuses to answer or to give a reference to a single published ABX audio component comparison which did not interfere with the panelists hearing differences. ( and if it does not allow recognition of difference what earthly use is it in judging audio components?) It still hasn't occured to you that maybe the components did sound the same, so that's the usefullness of it. Knowing that things tend to sound the smae irrespective of the claims, is worth knowing. It seems that he appointed you as his mouthpiece. We just happen to agree on this issue, we seldom comunicate on any issue. Poor Arny. He must be truly desperate to dig for this at the bottom of his barrel. Ludovic Mirabel That's the way we feel about you. You constantly post your screeds full of half truths and seem unable to get it, you've lost. There's nothing to your rants except that they are rants. There's nothing that's ever been demonstrated to be wrong with ABX as a protocol which is why it is used so often by so many doing real audio research. |
#113
|
|||
|
|||
Mickey's big admission
"Sander deWaal" wrote in message ... : George "Micro" Middius a ecrit: : : : Sander deWaal said: : : Ill Phalluson actually knows a thing or two about audio electronics, : but he rarely shares his knowledge. : : Just an endless stream of non-original, repetitive insults. : : That's typical of what you pinheads say when faced with real genius, Slick. It : amazes me that you tweakos are terrified of taking a blind test of your precious : tweako-freako gear. You know you'll fail, and Arnii Krooger is very smart. Get a : life. : : : Ah, "George", it is hurt my eyeballs to much from laugh :-) : Does I reminded you off the "connoisseurs de vin" which you always : writes about, eh? : : : Ignored post, note. : : : Love you two, sweetie :-) : : -- i found out hoe to Lionize a txt:-) Just take normal english TM, do a babelfish en-russian-en folloed by -korean-english. this is Middius' text after that proces: The pinhead which it spreads out typically after talking, you them see in real natural disaster, you are smooth. In order to guess a distant examination the eye of the system tweako-freako which you is valuable that you surprise tweakos them, it will carry and all of a sudden it does to surprise. It this you will fail, and the ArniiKrooger quite there is Iss who spreads out the frantovsk thing. Will get the life which spreads out. :-))) Rudy |
#114
|
|||
|
|||
Mickey's big admission
Signal said: If ABX hasn't been invalidated, let's just forget about the lack of published positive test results shall we? I mean.. you think it should work... so obviously it must. Your flippant mockery would not go over well in church, young man! aBxism does work, you know ... It's supposed to reinforce the blind faith of its mindless adherents, and it accomplishes that task with extraordinary efficacy. |
#115
|
|||
|
|||
Mickey's big admission
"Signal" wrote in message ... " emitted : Arny Krueger wrote: "paul packer" wrote in message Bravo, Ludovic. A spot-on posting. Only if your IQ is low enough to not spot the logical flaws, and you have no practical background in the topic so you can't spot the factual errors. Of course no-one in the ABX camp will applaud it, or likely even read it through, but that's their loss. It takes a lot of cups of coffee to retain consciousness while reading Ludovic's highly repetitive and bogus posts. Keep repeating common sense and who knows, maybe one day it will be common. Paul, you just flunked another IQ test. Maybe there is some chemical that will energize your synapses to the point where bilge like Ludovic's will start wrinkling your nose. Ask Paul Domer, in the past he's bragged about his self-experimentation along these lines. Of course, we're talking Paul Dormer, so many of us know that none of his experiments ever bore what most would call fruit. ________________________________________________ ________ Paul Packer said: Bravo, Ludovic. A spot-on posting. Arny answered: Only if your IQ is low enough to not spot the logical flaws, and you have no practical background in the topic so you can't spot the factual errors. Arny, how about a short list of these "logical flaws" and "factual errors". Don't you at all care to educate your readers by lucid examples rather than bare assertions? . And while you're at it: when will you come up with that one reference to an ABX "test" published in any journal or mag. with a positive outcome: "Yes , we heard the difference". You had 4 decades so far to do it, Still counting. Ludovic Mirabel How did someone called Paul Dormer sin against you? Just curious. You should know by now - it takes just one disagreement with Krueger for him to harbour a lifelong grudge you. If you disagree twice, that's grounds for a ceaseless vendetta... fa****a... whetever people of his religious order call it. Knowldege. |
#116
|
|||
|
|||
Mickey's big admission
"Signal" wrote in message ... " emitted : There's nothing that's ever been demonstrated to be wrong with ABX as a protocol which is why it is used so often by so many doing real audio research. If ABX hasn't been invalidated, let's just forget about the lack of published positive test results shall we? I mean.. you think it should work... so obviously it must. There are plenty of published works on ABX and there are plenty of people using it. If there aren't enough positive tests for you, then maybe you expected something that wasn't borne out by the evidence. |
#117
|
|||
|
|||
Mickey's big admission
"Sander deWaal" wrote in message ... : George "Micro" Middius a ecrit: : : : Sander deWaal said: : : Ill Phalluson actually knows a thing or two about audio electronics, : but he rarely shares his knowledge. : : Just an endless stream of non-original, repetitive insults. : : That's typical of what you pinheads say when faced with real genius, Slick. It : amazes me that you tweakos are terrified of taking a blind test of your precious : tweako-freako gear. You know you'll fail, and Arnii Krooger is very smart. Get a : life. : : : Ah, "George", it is hurt my eyeballs to much from laugh :-) : Does I reminded you off the "connoisseurs de vin" which you always : writes about, eh? : : : Ignored post, note. : : : Love you two, sweetie :-) : ?? hm, lost a post, you will note. how to Lionize a txt:-) Just take Normal english text, like George's text above, as mangled by en-russian-en-korean- en-french-english ~by babelfish~ out comes Lionised version with a distinctive religious 'tone' : " The pinhead which it typically extends after having spoken, you that they see in the true normal disaster, you are smooth. In order to guess an examination distant the eye of the tweako-freako from system which is to you value that you astonish by the tweakos they, it will carry and all it suddenly it makes to astonish. It this that you will fail, and ArniiKrooger completely there is the iss which extends the thing of frantovsk. The life will obtain which extends. " :-)) R. |
#118
|
|||
|
|||
Mickey's big admission
wrote in message nk.net... There's nothing that's ever been demonstrated to be wrong with ABX as a protocol which is why it is used so often by so many doing real audio research. But NOT used by people buying audio equipment. |
#119
|
|||
|
|||
Mickey's big admission
"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote in message ... Signal said: If ABX hasn't been invalidated, let's just forget about the lack of published positive test results shall we? I mean.. you think it should work... so obviously it must. Your flippant mockery would not go over well in church, young man! aBxism does work, you know ... It's supposed to reinforce the blind faith of its mindless adherents, and it accomplishes that task with extraordinary efficacy. EXACTLY! It's part of its design. |
#120
|
|||
|
|||
Mickey's big admission
"Clyde Slick" wrote in message ... wrote in message nk.net... There's nothing that's ever been demonstrated to be wrong with ABX as a protocol which is why it is used so often by so many doing real audio research. But NOT used by people buying audio equipment. Where's the need? Most everything is of sufficently high enough quality that there would be no difference most of the time. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
f.S. Tons of cheapgear | Pro Audio | |||
shipping Rode NT2000 in carrying case | Pro Audio | |||
WANTED: 6 Space Effects Rack Case | Pro Audio | |||
FS: 400 Closeouts!! Video Game, Computer, Mobile A/V, Personal A/V | Car Audio | |||
Sherwood S-8000 Schematic and Case needed | Vacuum Tubes |