Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#441
|
|||
|
|||
Bob Cain wrote in
: Gary Sokolich wrote: [a typically repugnant missive] "" is acutally Gary Sokolich. Gary obsessively stalks me in all the groups where I participate. Please ignore both him and this marker of his stalking. Sorry for the noise. Back to your regularly scheduled programming. Bob This and other recent so-called "markers" is just the latest tactic utilized by Bob Cain in his obsessive 5-year old crusade of posting lies and false assertions about me on the internet. In addition to being a habitual, chronic liar and hypocrite, Bob Cain is, in my opinion, a psycotic, paranoid sociopath, who is also afflicted by narsissistic personality disorder as well as grandiose delusional disorder, and is in serious need of psychiactric help. |
#442
|
|||
|
|||
SSJVCmag wrote:
On 9/22/05 11:49 AM, in article , "Ruud Broens" wrote: : On 9/21/05 10:45 PM, in article jVoYe.120966$Ep.54098@lakeread02, "ScottW" : wrote: (while adding crossposts to unassociated NG's) : Message to RAP... this idiot is going out of his way to **** off everyone on : RAO. Suggest you heel your dog before both groups go to hell. : : ScottW : : Scott, get this: : First, I'm not RAP's 'dog' (or any other functionary) any more than a cow's : tail is a 5th leg. You're barking up the wrong tree. My posts are on RAO. now, let's see: .... googling SSJVCmag + crosspost: cakewalk.audio rec.audio.tech rec.audio.pro alt.locksmithing alt.audio.pro.live-sound comp.os.linux.advocacy alt.os.linux microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6.browser alt.politics.usa.misc etc.etc.etc.boring.ssJvcflea seems more appropriateto launch the bulk of your 'work' in, eh ::::: Get over it and keep it in your own head. ::::: Please. : Thanks Wow, the trouble some folks go to. Posts are not really the same as CROSS posts, couple that with the interesting fact that SOMEBODY here has been reposting my single posts here in RAO all OVER the place under a different real address with my front end identifier on it... Talk to them. Been YEARS since I asked anything about cakewalk for a friend... Don;t remember ever having anything to ask in MPWIIB as I don;t use anything that has to do with it... I don;t do Linux either so except for a response to a thread where a bunch of linux folks were dumoping into a whole slew of other NG's for no reason and I responded to THAT... And there wouldn't be a whole lot of traffic compared to what goes down here. Politics is interesting, I keep politics lo on the radar and dtry top keep it in email or lists, m,ost folks just want to launch sacred cows at each other anyway, don;t have the time for that sort of silliness. Others are mostly Q&A on topic in the associated groups. Sheeshe... . |
#443
|
|||
|
|||
SSJVCmag wrote: On 9/22/05 11:59 AM, in article , "Ruud Broens" wrote: "SSJVCmag" wrote in message ... :..continued tossing of streams of trash into the neighbor's grass, .. he, you Arny's bro, bro ? :-) on the lawn, not just the dawn Never seen the man. |
#446
|
|||
|
|||
Scott Dorsey wrote: In article , pH wrote: On 21 Sep 2005 13:58:43 GMT, wrote: In rec.audio.pro pH wrote: On 20 Sep 2005 12:49:32 -0700, "ScottW" wrote: What is hight art? Something which takes skill / talent to accomplish; the rarer the skill / talent, the higher the art. What is low art? Something which takes no skill / talent to accomplish. So that guy in the Guinness Book of World records who ate an entire airplane (the only person to ever do so - very rare skill) A rare feat, perhaps, but... "skill"? If you say so... I remember being about nine years old and going through the Hirschorn museum in DC with my father. There was an exhibit from a fellow who took enemas of tempera paint and squirted them out on canvas. My father claimed that this was not art, that it was disgusting, and that anybody could do it. He was horrified that the artist was paid $250,000 for this work. I asked if he would be willing to do this for $250,000, and he said that not for a million dollars would he be willing to paint with an enema. "That," I replied, "is what makes it art." He glared pretty hard at me. --scott I guess this means it's not every asshole that can make art... |
#447
|
|||
|
|||
|
#448
|
|||
|
|||
SSJVCmag wrote: On 9/27/05 2:09 PM, in article , "Sander deWaal" wrote: SSJVCmag said: Dang... Y'know, I tried to find that out and instead of helping, everybody started making the problem worse, seemingly on purpose.... Problem? What problem? No likee, no clickee! Hey, that's a GREAT idea.. Could you show me how that works? |
#449
|
|||
|
|||
"Harry Lavo" wrote in message news "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Harry Lavo" wrote in message "Jenn" wrote in message ... In article , "Arny Krueger" wrote: "Jenn" wrote in message In article , "Arny Krueger" wrote: "Jenn" wrote in message In article , "Arny Krueger" wrote: IOW, I like classical and certain kinds of traditional music, but I realize that my grandchildren see the same music from 50+ years later. Is teaching about the Revolutionary War less important now than it was 50 years ago? I think so. Increasingly true the more recent the war. IOW The Korean war has lost tremendous importance, as has WW2. Gee, I think that it's just as important now to learn about those events as it ever was. Something about "those who fail to heed history, are bound to.........". There's a difference between heeding history and obsessing over it. Right after WW2 the US arguably had a national obsession with WW2. As a nation we mulled it over again and again. We had movies about it, TV shows about it, magazine articles about it, books about it, and even a president or two (Eisenhower and Kennedy) about it. Imagine that. Simply because it was the biggest threat to freedom in the world up until that time and a magnificent stand with an uncertain outcome by the free people of the world. Obsessed? Shame on us! Then why were so many people against joining in the war? Until Pearl Harbor, and after there was a very large anti-war contingent. |
#450
|
|||
|
|||
Just a note that whatever wunderkind is foisting these fairly uninteresting
single-group messages from RAO into this bunch of newsgroups just needs to be ignored. I can't apologise for them but I sympathise. NO RESPONSE NEEDED. Apology for the small intrusion. |
#451
|
|||
|
|||
SSJVCmag wrote: Just a note that whatever wunderkind is foisting these fairly uninteresting single-group messages from RAO into this bunch of newsgroups just needs to be ignored. I can't apologise for them but I sympathise. NO RESPONSE NEEDED. Apology for the small intrusion. Want peace? You know what to do. |
#452
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 22:58:31 GMT, "
wrote: Right after WW2 the US arguably had a national obsession with WW2. As a nation we mulled it over again and again. We had movies about it, TV shows about it, magazine articles about it, books about it, and even a president or two (Eisenhower and Kennedy) about it. Imagine that. Simply because it was the biggest threat to freedom in the world up until that time and a magnificent stand with an uncertain outcome by the free people of the world. Obsessed? Shame on us! Then why were so many people against joining in the war? Until Pearl Harbor, and after there was a very large anti-war contingent. It wasn't perceived as a threat to America until Pearl Harbour. Though happy to accept refugees from Hitler's oppression, even the Jewish lobby didn't seem to see any reason to go over there and stop it happening. Though, of course rescuing Europe in WW2 was used as leverage towards the creation of Israel, a promise made by the Balfour declaration of 1917, but conveniently forgotten. Compare the current "concern" for the well-being of the Iraqi population. International politics is not a clean game. |
#453
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 09 Oct 2005 17:14:38 +0200, Chel van Gennip
wrote: Just for the record, in 1917 Balfour promissed several things as a package deal, the declaration reads: "His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country." Indeed. And, as it was patently impossible to give land to Israel without taking it away from someone else, the third clause provides a get-out. Nice one, Arthur :-) |
#454
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.misc,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Julian Hirsch "I don't really have a replacement career,"Morein said. "It's a very gnawing thing."
In article , "Robert Morein"
wrote: He was not a charasmatic person, though I can provide one personal anecdote. It happens we took the same New Jersey Transit train. One morning, we got off together. I saw a man of such stunning radiance that I picked him out of a crowd of a hundred people This anecdote resulted in a visit from the police after Hirsch complained that my son was stalking him, it wasn't happenstance at all. Sadly, it wasn't the first time, and hasn't been the last, either. Unfortunately, Bob can NEVER admit he's been beaten, or he's wrong. He spent 12 years in college trying to write a thesis that was totally without any scientific merit. When Drexel got tired of his bleating about not giving him a degree, he sued them. And even after he was proven IN COURT to have been wrong, he insisted on appealing to the Supreme Court in Washington. And then he criticized THE SUPREME COURT and HIS OWN LAWYER for "erroneous legal reasoning"! He then wanted ME to fund a lawsuit against his LAWYER! So you're not going to change him, god knows his mother tried and it killed her. Dr. Sylvan Morein, DDS PROVEN PUBLISHED FACTS about my Son, Robert Morein -- Bob Morein History -- http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/mld/l...ws/4853918.htm Doctoral student takes intellectual property case to Supreme Court By L. STUART DITZEN Philadelphia Inquirer PHILADELPHIA -Even the professors who dismissed him from a doctoral program at Drexel University agreed that Robert Morein was uncommonly smart. They apparently didn't realize that he was uncommonly stubborn too - so much so that he would mount a court fight all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court to challenge his dismissal. The Supremes have already rejected this appeal, btw. "It's a personality trait I have - I'm a tenacious guy," said Morein, a pleasantly eccentric man regarded by friends as an inventive genius. "And we do come to a larger issue here." An "inventive genius" that has never invented anything. And hardly "pleasantly" eccentric. A five-year legal battle between this unusual ex-student and one of Philadelphia's premier educational institutions has gone largely unnoticed by the media and the public. Because no one gives a **** about a 50 year old loser. But it has been the subject of much attention in academia. Drexel says it dismissed Morein in 1995 because he failed, after eight years, to complete a thesis required for a doctorate in electrical and computer engineering. Not to mention the 12 years it took him to get thru high school! BWAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Morein, 50, of Dresher, Pa., contends that he was dismissed only after his thesis adviser "appropriated" an innovative idea Morein had developed in a rarefied area of thought called "estimation theory" and arranged to have it patented. A contention rejected by three courts. From a 50 YEAR OLD that has done NOTHING PRODUCTIVE with his life. In February 2000, Philadelphia Common Pleas Court Judge Esther R. Sylvester ruled that Morein's adviser indeed had taken his idea. An idea that was worth nothing, because it didn't work. Just like Robert Morein, who has never worked a day in his life. Sylvester held that Morein had been unjustly dismissed and she ordered Drexel to reinstate him or refund his tuition. Funnily enough, Drexel AGREED to reinstate Morein, who rejected the offer because he knew he was and IS a failed loser. Spending daddy's money to cover up his lack of productivity. That brought roars of protest from the lions of academia. There is a long tradition in America of noninterference by the courts in academic decisions. Backed by every major university in Pennsylvania and organizations representing thousands of others around the country, Drexel appealed to the state Superior Court. The appellate court, by a 2-1 vote, reversed Sylvester in June 2001 and restored the status quo. Morein was, once again, out at Drexel. And the time-honored axiom that courts ought to keep their noses out of academic affairs was reasserted. The state Supreme Court declined to review the case and, in an ordinary litigation, that would have been the end of it. But Morein, in a quixotic gesture that goes steeply against the odds, has asked the highest court in the land to give him a hearing. Daddy throws more money down the crapper. His attorney, Faye Riva Cohen, said the Supreme Court appeal is important even if it fails because it raises the issue of whether a university has a right to lay claim to a student's ideas - or intellectual property - without compensation. "Any time you are in a Ph.D. program, you are a serf, you are a slave," said Cohen. Morein "is concerned not only for himself. He feels that what happened to him is pretty common." It's called HIGHER EDUCATION, honey. The students aren't in charge, the UNIVERSITY and PROFESSORS are. Drexel's attorney, Neil J. Hamburg, called Morein's appeal - and his claim that his idea was stolen - "preposterous." "I will eat my shoe if the Supreme Court hears this case," declared Hamburg. "We're not even going to file a response. He is a brilliant guy, but his intelligence should be used for the advancement of society rather than pursuing self-destructive litigation." No **** sherlock. The litigation began in 1997, when Morein sued Drexel claiming that a committee of professors had dumped him after he accused his faculty adviser, Paul Kalata, of appropriating his idea. His concept was considered to have potential value for businesses in minutely measuring the internal functions of machines, industrial processes and electronic systems. The field of "estimation theory" is one in which scientists attempt to calculate what they cannot plainly observe, such as the inside workings of a nuclear plant or a computer. My estimation theory? There is NO brain at work inside the head of Robert Morein, only sawdust. Prior to Morein's dismissal, Drexel looked into his complaint against Kalata and concluded that the associate professor had done nothing wrong. Kalata, through a university lawyer, declined to comment. At a nonjury trial before Sylvester in 1999, Morein testified that Kalata in 1990 had posed a technical problem for him to study for his thesis. It related to estimation theory. Kalata, who did not appear at the trial, said in a 1998 deposition that a Cherry Hill company for which he was a paid consultant, K-Tron International, had asked him to develop an alternate estimation method for it. The company manufactures bulk material feeders and conveyors used in industrial processes. Morein testified that, after much study, he experienced "a flash of inspiration" and came up with a novel mathematical concept to address the problem Kalata had presented. Without his knowledge, Morein said, Kalata shared the idea with K-Tron. K-Tron then applied for a patent, listing Kalata and Morein as co-inventors. Morein said he agreed "under duress" to the arrangement, but felt "locked into a highly disadvantageous situation." As a result, he testified, he became alienated from Kalata. As events unfolded, Kalata signed over his interest in the patent to K-Tron. The company never capitalized on the technology and eventually allowed the patent to lapse. No one made any money from it. Because it was bogus. Even Kalata was mortified that he was a victim of this SCAMSTER, Robert Morein. In 1991, Morein went to the head of Drexel's electrical engineering department, accused Kalata of appropriating his intellectual property, and asked for a new faculty adviser. The staff at Drexel laughed wildly at the ignorance of Robert Morein. He didn't get one. Instead, a committee of four professors, including Kalata, was formed to oversee Morein's thesis work. Four years later, the committee dismissed him, saying he had failed to complete his thesis. So Morein ****s up his first couple years, gets new faculty advisers (a TEAM), and then ****s up again! Brilliant! Morein claimed that the committee intentionally had undermined him. Morein makes LOTS of claims that are nonsense. One look thru the usenet proves it. Judge Sylvester agreed. In her ruling, Sylvester wrote: "It is this court's opinion that the defendants were motivated by bad faith and ill will." So much for political machine judges. The U.S. Supreme Court receives 7,000 appeals a year and agrees to hear only about 100 of them. Hamburg, Drexel's attorney, is betting the high court will reject Morein's appeal out of hand because its focal point - concerning a student's right to intellectual property - was not central to the litigation in the Pennsylvania courts. Morein said he understands it's a long shot, but he feels he must pursue it. Failure. Look it up in Websters. You'll see a picture of Robert Morein. The poster boy for SCAMMING LOSERS. "I had to seek closure," he said. Without a doctorate, he said, he has been unable to pursue a career he had hoped would lead him into research on artificial intelligence. Who better to tell us about "artificial intelligence". BWAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! As it is, Morein lives at home with his father and makes a modest income from stock investments. He has written a film script that he is trying to make into a movie. And in the basement of his father's home he is working on an invention, an industrial pump so powerful it could cut steel with a bulletlike stream of water. FAILED STUDENT FAILED MOVIE MAKER FAILED SCREENWRITER FAILED INVESTOR FAILED DRIVER FAILED SON FAILED PARENTS FAILED INVENTOR FAILED PLAINTIFF FAILED HOMOSEXUAL FAILED HUMAN FAILED FAILED But none of it is what he had imagined for himself. "I don't really have a replacement career," Morein said. "It's a very gnawing thing." |
#455
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.misc,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Julian Hirsch "I don't really have a replacement career,"Morein said. "It's a very gnawing thing."
In article , "Robert Morein"
wrote: He was not a charasmatic person, though I can provide one personal anecdote. It happens we took the same New Jersey Transit train. One morning, we got off together. I saw a man of such stunning radiance that I picked him out of a crowd of a hundred people This anecdote resulted in a visit from the police after Hirsch complained that my son was stalking him, it wasn't happenstance at all. Sadly, it wasn't the first time, and hasn't been the last, either. Unfortunately, Bob can NEVER admit he's been beaten, or he's wrong. He spent 12 years in college trying to write a thesis that was totally without any scientific merit. When Drexel got tired of his bleating about not giving him a degree, he sued them. And even after he was proven IN COURT to have been wrong, he insisted on appealing to the Supreme Court in Washington. And then he criticized THE SUPREME COURT and HIS OWN LAWYER for "erroneous legal reasoning"! He then wanted ME to fund a lawsuit against his LAWYER! So you're not going to change him, god knows his mother tried and it killed her. Dr. Sylvan Morein, DDS PROVEN PUBLISHED FACTS about my Son, Robert Morein -- Bob Morein History -- http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/mld/l...ws/4853918.htm Doctoral student takes intellectual property case to Supreme Court By L. STUART DITZEN Philadelphia Inquirer PHILADELPHIA -Even the professors who dismissed him from a doctoral program at Drexel University agreed that Robert Morein was uncommonly smart. They apparently didn't realize that he was uncommonly stubborn too - so much so that he would mount a court fight all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court to challenge his dismissal. The Supremes have already rejected this appeal, btw. "It's a personality trait I have - I'm a tenacious guy," said Morein, a pleasantly eccentric man regarded by friends as an inventive genius. "And we do come to a larger issue here." An "inventive genius" that has never invented anything. And hardly "pleasantly" eccentric. A five-year legal battle between this unusual ex-student and one of Philadelphia's premier educational institutions has gone largely unnoticed by the media and the public. Because no one gives a **** about a 50 year old loser. But it has been the subject of much attention in academia. Drexel says it dismissed Morein in 1995 because he failed, after eight years, to complete a thesis required for a doctorate in electrical and computer engineering. Not to mention the 12 years it took him to get thru high school! BWAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Morein, 50, of Dresher, Pa., contends that he was dismissed only after his thesis adviser "appropriated" an innovative idea Morein had developed in a rarefied area of thought called "estimation theory" and arranged to have it patented. A contention rejected by three courts. From a 50 YEAR OLD that has done NOTHING PRODUCTIVE with his life. In February 2000, Philadelphia Common Pleas Court Judge Esther R. Sylvester ruled that Morein's adviser indeed had taken his idea. An idea that was worth nothing, because it didn't work. Just like Robert Morein, who has never worked a day in his life. Sylvester held that Morein had been unjustly dismissed and she ordered Drexel to reinstate him or refund his tuition. Funnily enough, Drexel AGREED to reinstate Morein, who rejected the offer because he knew he was and IS a failed loser. Spending daddy's money to cover up his lack of productivity. That brought roars of protest from the lions of academia. There is a long tradition in America of noninterference by the courts in academic decisions. Backed by every major university in Pennsylvania and organizations representing thousands of others around the country, Drexel appealed to the state Superior Court. The appellate court, by a 2-1 vote, reversed Sylvester in June 2001 and restored the status quo. Morein was, once again, out at Drexel. And the time-honored axiom that courts ought to keep their noses out of academic affairs was reasserted. The state Supreme Court declined to review the case and, in an ordinary litigation, that would have been the end of it. But Morein, in a quixotic gesture that goes steeply against the odds, has asked the highest court in the land to give him a hearing. Daddy throws more money down the crapper. His attorney, Faye Riva Cohen, said the Supreme Court appeal is important even if it fails because it raises the issue of whether a university has a right to lay claim to a student's ideas - or intellectual property - without compensation. "Any time you are in a Ph.D. program, you are a serf, you are a slave," said Cohen. Morein "is concerned not only for himself. He feels that what happened to him is pretty common." It's called HIGHER EDUCATION, honey. The students aren't in charge, the UNIVERSITY and PROFESSORS are. Drexel's attorney, Neil J. Hamburg, called Morein's appeal - and his claim that his idea was stolen - "preposterous." "I will eat my shoe if the Supreme Court hears this case," declared Hamburg. "We're not even going to file a response. He is a brilliant guy, but his intelligence should be used for the advancement of society rather than pursuing self-destructive litigation." No **** sherlock. The litigation began in 1997, when Morein sued Drexel claiming that a committee of professors had dumped him after he accused his faculty adviser, Paul Kalata, of appropriating his idea. His concept was considered to have potential value for businesses in minutely measuring the internal functions of machines, industrial processes and electronic systems. The field of "estimation theory" is one in which scientists attempt to calculate what they cannot plainly observe, such as the inside workings of a nuclear plant or a computer. My estimation theory? There is NO brain at work inside the head of Robert Morein, only sawdust. Prior to Morein's dismissal, Drexel looked into his complaint against Kalata and concluded that the associate professor had done nothing wrong. Kalata, through a university lawyer, declined to comment. At a nonjury trial before Sylvester in 1999, Morein testified that Kalata in 1990 had posed a technical problem for him to study for his thesis. It related to estimation theory. Kalata, who did not appear at the trial, said in a 1998 deposition that a Cherry Hill company for which he was a paid consultant, K-Tron International, had asked him to develop an alternate estimation method for it. The company manufactures bulk material feeders and conveyors used in industrial processes. Morein testified that, after much study, he experienced "a flash of inspiration" and came up with a novel mathematical concept to address the problem Kalata had presented. Without his knowledge, Morein said, Kalata shared the idea with K-Tron. K-Tron then applied for a patent, listing Kalata and Morein as co-inventors. Morein said he agreed "under duress" to the arrangement, but felt "locked into a highly disadvantageous situation." As a result, he testified, he became alienated from Kalata. As events unfolded, Kalata signed over his interest in the patent to K-Tron. The company never capitalized on the technology and eventually allowed the patent to lapse. No one made any money from it. Because it was bogus. Even Kalata was mortified that he was a victim of this SCAMSTER, Robert Morein. In 1991, Morein went to the head of Drexel's electrical engineering department, accused Kalata of appropriating his intellectual property, and asked for a new faculty adviser. The staff at Drexel laughed wildly at the ignorance of Robert Morein. He didn't get one. Instead, a committee of four professors, including Kalata, was formed to oversee Morein's thesis work. Four years later, the committee dismissed him, saying he had failed to complete his thesis. So Morein ****s up his first couple years, gets new faculty advisers (a TEAM), and then ****s up again! Brilliant! Morein claimed that the committee intentionally had undermined him. Morein makes LOTS of claims that are nonsense. One look thru the usenet proves it. Judge Sylvester agreed. In her ruling, Sylvester wrote: "It is this court's opinion that the defendants were motivated by bad faith and ill will." So much for political machine judges. The U.S. Supreme Court receives 7,000 appeals a year and agrees to hear only about 100 of them. Hamburg, Drexel's attorney, is betting the high court will reject Morein's appeal out of hand because its focal point - concerning a student's right to intellectual property - was not central to the litigation in the Pennsylvania courts. Morein said he understands it's a long shot, but he feels he must pursue it. Failure. Look it up in Websters. You'll see a picture of Robert Morein. The poster boy for SCAMMING LOSERS. "I had to seek closure," he said. Without a doctorate, he said, he has been unable to pursue a career he had hoped would lead him into research on artificial intelligence. Who better to tell us about "artificial intelligence". BWAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! As it is, Morein lives at home with his father and makes a modest income from stock investments. He has written a film script that he is trying to make into a movie. And in the basement of his father's home he is working on an invention, an industrial pump so powerful it could cut steel with a bulletlike stream of water. FAILED STUDENT FAILED MOVIE MAKER FAILED SCREENWRITER FAILED INVESTOR FAILED DRIVER FAILED SON FAILED PARENTS FAILED INVENTOR FAILED PLAINTIFF FAILED HOMOSEXUAL FAILED HUMAN FAILED FAILED But none of it is what he had imagined for himself. "I don't really have a replacement career," Morein said. "It's a very gnawing thing." |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
John Atkinson: audio ignoramus or sleazebag? | Audio Opinions | |||
question for anyone who bought an Aardvark product bundled with Cakewalk | Pro Audio | |||
question for anyone who bought an Aardvark product bundled with Cakewalk | Pro Audio | |||
question for anyone who bought an Aardvark product bundled with Cakewalk | Pro Audio | |||
RCA out and Speaker Question in 2004 Ranger Edge Question | Car Audio |