Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#161
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Audiophiles' Delight: Vinyl LPs Still Sell
"Jenn" wrote in message ... In article , "Arny Krueger" wrote: "Jenn" wrote in message I'm admittedly uneducated about the scientific aspects of audio. I've admitted that all along. But by definition, I'm highly educated about what sounds like music to my ears. Obviously, that is far more important. I believe the word for the day is solipsism. Solipsism (Latin: solus, alone + ipse, self) is the philosophical idea that "My mind is the only thing that I know exists." Solipsism is an epistemological or metaphysical position that knowledge of anything outside the mind is unjustified. The external world and other minds cannot be known and might not exist. IOW Jenn lives in a little universe that is known only to her. In her little universe, she is always right. In order to persist in this mental state, she has to admit that she can know nothing that exists outside her mind. IOW, she is incapable of speaking sensibly to anybody but herself. Many of us have known this all along. Thanks for finally admitting this critical fact to us, Jenn. Lordy, Arny. What did they do to you yesterday? My paragraph at the top of this page is clear and reasonable to the normal reader. Two questions: 1. Does anyone else know more about how music sounds to you than you? 2. When you listen to music, which is more important, A. how it sounds to you, or, B. how it sounds to someone else? ********************************************** This seems to add substance to the observation that Arny is on his worst behavior right after church. |
#162
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Audiophiles' Delight: Vinyl LPs Still Sell
"John Atkinson" wrote in
message On Sep 8, 4:45 pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "John Atkinson" wrote in message You said that I have "long held" that you are "insane," Mr. Krueger...This is not correct. Are you saying that ****R doesn't believe that I'm insane? He has stated many times that he does. But that has nothing to do with me. Maybe yes, maybe no. Certainly, your many suggests that I may be insane were part of his mindset before he started his current campaign of libel and character assassination. As I said, he is not me, neither does he speak for me. No John, but when it comes to repeated libels and character assignation, he speaks like you. I have made no statement about your purported insanity since 2002, Mr. Krueger. Well, other than on July 23 of this year, and an indirect reference on July 4, and... The reference I made on July 23 was to the same 2002 posting to which I have already referred in this thread. Doesn't matter, John. Whether you repeat yourself or not, every time you make a posting like that, you are libeling me. The July 4 reference to your supposed insanity was actually by "Sssh," not me. You both posted in that thread, and your posts were related. As I said, we are two different people with different opinions on this matter. I actually defended you in that July 4 posting, Mr. Krueger, by conjecturing that a possible reason for your inability to find a Web page for which you had been given the URL was not insanity. Instead, it could just have been your lack of familiarity with browser programs. Obviously the true explanation was beyond your ability to correctly surmise, John. You could have put an end to the whole affair by posting a URL, but you were stubbornly and childishly refusing to do so. You fell into my trap and discredited yourself over and over again. Nice Job! However, that person is not me and his behavior says nothing about my own feelings. As I have now repeatedly stated, I [certainly] don't think you are insane. I'm sure you [certainly] don't. In which case, why are you continuing to argue the opposite, Mr. Krueger? John every time I troll you, you jump out of the water and bite at my hook. |
#163
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Audiophiles' Delight: Vinyl LPs Still Sell
"Jenn" wrote in message
In article , "Arny Krueger" wrote: "Jenn" wrote in message In article , "Arny Krueger" wrote: "Jenn" wrote in message I'm admittedly uneducated about the scientific aspects of audio. I've admitted that all along. But by definition, I'm highly educated about what sounds like music to my ears. Obviously, that is far more important. I believe the word for the day is solipsism. Solipsism (Latin: solus, alone + ipse, self) is the philosophical idea that "My mind is the only thing that I know exists." Solipsism is an epistemological or metaphysical position that knowledge of anything outside the mind is unjustified. The external world and other minds cannot be known and might not exist. IOW Jenn lives in a little universe that is known only to her. In her little universe, she is always right. In order to persist in this mental state, she has to admit that she can know nothing that exists outside her mind. IOW, she is incapable of speaking sensibly to anybody but herself. Many of us have known this all along. Thanks for finally admitting this critical fact to us, Jenn. Lordy, Arny. What did they do to you yesterday? ???????????????/ My paragraph at the top of this page is clear and reasonable to the normal reader. Two questions: 1. Does anyone else know more about how music sounds to you than you? Possibly. Please describe how that is possible. Take a person who is overwhelmed with hysteria, and mouths pre-programmed sayings from various high end ragazines and authors. Obviously, this person is out of touch with their real perceptions. A person with insight to the situation may better understand that person's unhinged perceptions better than that person themselves. 2. When you listen to music, which is more important, A. how it sounds to you, or, B. how it sounds to someone else? Given that I do so much live sound and recording work, how things sound to other people is very important to me. Obviously we're not speaking of the alleged work that you. Not obvious and not alleged. But thanks for responding that way Jenn, it makes your hysterical state of mind even clearer to any neutral observers. We're speaking of home audio. So Jenn you are saying that your comments in this thread are totally irrelevant to your work as a music teacher? Wow, you really are hysterical! :-( |
#164
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Audiophiles' Delight: Vinyl LPs Still Sell
"Harry Lavo" wrote in message
This seems to add substance to the observation that Arny is on his worst behavior right after church. Cite an independent source for that observation. Besides Harry, you don't seem to know when I actually worship, so you can't know when "right after church" is. IOW Harry, you're talking out of the back of your neck, again. |
#165
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Audiophiles' Delight: Vinyl LPs Still Sell
On Sep 9, 6:35*am, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"John Atkinson" wrote in On Sep 8, 4:45 pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "John Atkinson" wrote in message You said that I have "long held" that you are "insane," Mr. Krueger...This is not correct. Are you saying that my intellectual superior doesn't believe that I'm insane? He has stated many times that he does. But that has nothing *to do with me. Maybe yes, *maybe no. Or how about a certain "no". My conclusions about your mental health are my own. I note that many, many others have come to the same conclusion. Certainly, your many suggests that I may be insane were part of his mindset before he started his current campaign of libel and character assassination. *As I said, he is not me, neither does he speak for me. No John, but when it comes to repeated libels and character assignation, he speaks like you. "In independent tests, GOIA's insanity was proven to a 99.9% confidence level. This was repeated in dozens of other peer-reviewed clinical trials." Character assignation: the act of apportioning GOIA's 'character'. Currently GOIA's 'character' is apportioned 65% ****ty, 15% hypocrite, 10% paranoid and 10% deluded. |
#166
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Audiophiles' Delight: Vinyl LPs Still Sell
On 9 Sep, 07:35, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
The July 4 reference to your supposed insanity was actually *by "Sssh," not me. You both posted in that thread, and your posts were related. Arnie, you are an asshole and a mother ****er. Now, we both posted in the same thread, and our posts are related. You now bear responsibility for what I said; in essence, you callled yourself an asshole and a mother ****er. the miracles of Kroologic!!!! |
#167
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Audiophiles' Delight: Vinyl LPs Still Sell
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote: "Jenn" wrote in message In article , "Arny Krueger" wrote: "Jenn" wrote in message In article , "Arny Krueger" wrote: "Jenn" wrote in message I'm admittedly uneducated about the scientific aspects of audio. I've admitted that all along. But by definition, I'm highly educated about what sounds like music to my ears. Obviously, that is far more important. I believe the word for the day is solipsism. Solipsism (Latin: solus, alone + ipse, self) is the philosophical idea that "My mind is the only thing that I know exists." Solipsism is an epistemological or metaphysical position that knowledge of anything outside the mind is unjustified. The external world and other minds cannot be known and might not exist. IOW Jenn lives in a little universe that is known only to her. In her little universe, she is always right. In order to persist in this mental state, she has to admit that she can know nothing that exists outside her mind. IOW, she is incapable of speaking sensibly to anybody but herself. Many of us have known this all along. Thanks for finally admitting this critical fact to us, Jenn. Lordy, Arny. What did they do to you yesterday? ???????????????/ My paragraph at the top of this page is clear and reasonable to the normal reader. Two questions: 1. Does anyone else know more about how music sounds to you than you? Possibly. Please describe how that is possible. Take a person who is overwhelmed with hysteria, and mouths pre-programmed sayings from various high end ragazines and authors. Obviously, this person is out of touch with their real perceptions. A person with insight to the situation may better understand that person's unhinged perceptions better than that person themselves. Here you show a lack of even basic understanding of perception. A person can't be "out of touch with their real perceptions". Their perception is their perception. Their perception may be misguided, against the norm, influenced by confounding factors, etc. but it is STILL their perception. In the case of listening to music, they still hear it as they hear it, as in your example above concerning CD bigots. I suggest some basic study in psychology, and specifically some reading of the very excellent "Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal". 2. When you listen to music, which is more important, A. how it sounds to you, or, B. how it sounds to someone else? Given that I do so much live sound and recording work, how things sound to other people is very important to me. Obviously we're not speaking of the alleged work that you (do). Not obvious and not alleged. But thanks for responding that way Jenn, it makes your hysterical state of mind even clearer to any neutral observers. Of course it's alleged. You've claimed that you do it, but no one here knows for sure. We're speaking of home audio. So Jenn you are saying that your comments in this thread are totally irrelevant to your work as a music teacher? In this thread, yes. |
#168
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Audiophiles' Delight: Vinyl LPs Still Sell
On Sep 9, 4:56�am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote: On Sep 9, 6:35�am, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "John Atkinson" wrote in On Sep 8, 4:45 pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "John Atkinson" wrote in message You said that I have "long held" that you are "insane," Mr. Krueger...This is not correct. Are you saying that my intellectual superior doesn't believe that I'm insane? He has stated many times that he does. But that has nothing �to do with me. Maybe yes, �maybe no. Or how about a certain "no". My conclusions about your mental health are my own. I note that many, many others have come to the same conclusion. Certainly, your many suggests that I may be insane were part of his mindset before he started his current campaign of libel and character assassination. �As I said, he is not me, neither does he speak for me. No John, but when it comes to repeated libels and character assignation, he speaks like you. "In independent tests, GOIA's insanity was proven to a 99.9% confidence level. This was repeated in dozens of other peer-reviewed clinical trials." Character assignation: the act of apportioning GOIA's 'character'. Currently GOIA's 'character' is apportioned 65% ****ty, 15% hypocrite, 10% paranoid and 10% deluded.- For the record, I think he's a 'tard. Boon |
#169
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Audiophiles' Delight: Vinyl LPs Still Sell
On Sep 9, 4:35�am, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"John Atkinson" wrote in On Sep 8, 4:45 pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "John Atkinson" wrote in message You said that I have "long held" that you are "insane," Mr. Krueger...This is not correct. Are you saying that ****R doesn't believe that I'm insane? He has stated many times that he does. But that has nothing �to do with me. Maybe yes, �maybe no. Certainly, your many suggests that I may be insane were part of his mindset before he started his current campaign of libel and character assassination. �As I said, he is not me, neither does he speak for me. No John, but when it comes to repeated libels and character assignation, he speaks like you. I have made no statement about your purported insanity since 2002, Mr. Krueger. Well, other than on July 23 of this year, and an indirect reference on July 4, and... The reference I made on July 23 was to the same 2002 posting to which I have already referred in this thread. Doesn't matter, John. Whether you repeat yourself or not, every time you make a posting like that, you are libeling me. The July 4 reference to your supposed insanity was actually �by "Sssh," not me. You both posted in that thread, and your posts were related. As I said, we are two different people with different opinions on this matter. I actually defended you in that July 4 posting, Mr. Krueger, by conjecturing that a possible reason for your inability to find a Web page for which you had been given the URL was not insanity. Instead, it could just have been your lack of familiarity with browser programs. Obviously the true explanation was beyond your ability to correctly surmise, John. You could have put an end to the whole affair by posting a URL, but you were stubbornly and childishly refusing to do so. You fell into my trap and discredited yourself over and over again. Nice Job! However, that person is not me and his behavior says nothing about my own feelings. As I have now repeatedly stated, I [certainly] don't think you are insane. I'm sure you [certainly] don't. In which case, why are you continuing to argue the opposite, Mr. Krueger? John every time I troll you, you jump out of the water and bite at my hook. Then he thrashes around the deck and tears your boat to shreds. When it sinks, you swim to shore, buy an even ****tier boat, and try your luck again. That's a more realistic analogy. Boon |
#170
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Audiophiles' Delight: Vinyl LPs Still Sell
"Jenn" wrote in message
In article , "Arny Krueger" wrote: Take a person who is overwhelmed with hysteria, and mouths pre-programmed sayings from various high end ragazines and authors. Obviously, this person is out of touch with their real perceptions. A person with insight to the situation may better understand that person's unhinged perceptions better than that person themselves. Here you show a lack of even basic understanding of perception. A person can't be "out of touch with their real perceptions". Here Jenn denies the existence of illusions. Their perception is their perception. Here Jenn asserts that a given set of stimuli can cause only one response. Then, it seems that a light dawns, and she admits that other, better founded perceptions might be possible. Their perception may be misguided, against the norm, influenced by confounding factors, etc. but it is STILL their perception. I never said it wasn't. What I was trying to communicate is that were the poor guidance and confounding factors removed, that different perceptions would result. I called those unconfounded, properly guided perceptions "true perceptions". But Jenn, in her typical hysterical rush to judgment, starts mouthing off with cheap accusations like: "Here you show a lack of even basic understanding of perception." Kind of you Jenn to so quickly contradict yourself. Your post nets out to a logical zero, so there's no need to address its content, other than to observe that it cancelled itself out. |
#171
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Audiophiles' Delight: Vinyl LPs Still Sell
On Sep 9, 3:11*pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"Jenn" wrote in message In article , "Arny Krueger" wrote: Take a person who is overwhelmed with hysteria, and mouths pre-programmed sayings from various high end ragazines and authors. *Obviously, this person is out of touch with their real perceptions. A person with insight to the situation may better understand that person's unhinged perceptions better than that person themselves. Here you show a lack of even basic understanding of perception. *A person can't be "out of touch with their real perceptions". Here Jenn denies the existence of illusions. No, GOIA, here Jenn states that a person who sees an oasis in the desert sees an oasis in the desert. Are you really this dense, or is your insanity at work again? Their perception is their perception. Here Jenn asserts that a given set of stimuli can cause only one response.. The Debating Trade. Don't try this at home, kids! GOIA is a trained perfeshunnel! Then, it seems that a light dawns, and she admits that other, better founded perceptions might be possible. GOIA is getting a woody. Their perception may be misguided, against the norm, influenced by confounding factors, etc. but it is STILL their perception. I never said it wasn't. What I was trying to communicate is that were the poor guidance and confounding factors removed, that different perceptions would result. I called those unconfounded, properly guided perceptions "true perceptions". They are no more true than any other perception, GOIA. Jenn's point that a perception is a perception is valid. It's axiomatic, in fact. But Jenn, in her typical hysterical rush to judgment, *starts mouthing off with cheap accusations like: "Here you show a lack of even basic understanding of perception." Kind of you Jenn to so quickly contradict yourself. Your post nets out to a logical zero, so there's no need to address its content, other than to observe that it cancelled itself out. Your wiring requires rerouting, GOIA. |
#172
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Audiophiles' Delight: Vinyl LPs Still Sell
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote: "Jenn" wrote in message In article , "Arny Krueger" wrote: Take a person who is overwhelmed with hysteria, and mouths pre-programmed sayings from various high end ragazines and authors. Obviously, this person is out of touch with their real perceptions. A person with insight to the situation may better understand that person's unhinged perceptions better than that person themselves. Here you show a lack of even basic understanding of perception. A person can't be "out of touch with their real perceptions". Here Jenn denies the existence of illusions. Incorrect, Arny. Whether or not one's perception is an illusion, it is still their perception. Their perception is their perception. Here Jenn asserts that a given set of stimuli can cause only one response. Incorrect, Arny. A person's response to a given stimulus at any given moment IS that person's perception. Then, it seems that a light dawns, and she admits that other, better founded perceptions might be possible. Incorrect, Arny. Their perception may be misguided, against the norm, influenced by confounding factors, etc. but it is STILL their perception. I never said it wasn't. What I was trying to communicate is that were the poor guidance and confounding factors removed, that different perceptions would result. I called those unconfounded, properly guided perceptions "true perceptions". Incorrect, Arny. It has NOTHING to do with correct or incorrect. If you look across your living room and see a pink elephant, that IS your perception, whether the elephant is there or not. But Jenn, in her typical hysterical rush to judgment, starts mouthing off with cheap accusations like: "Here you show a lack of even basic understanding of perception." That's because you do, clearly. Kind of you Jenn to so quickly contradict yourself. Your post nets out to a logical zero, so there's no need to address its content, other than to observe that it cancelled itself out. Finally, you are correct: there is no need for you to address the content because you are incorrect on each count. One can't be "out of touch with their real perceptions". |
#173
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Audiophiles' Delight: Vinyl LPs Still Sell
In article
, ScottW wrote: On Sep 9, 3:01*pm, Jenn wrote: Finally, you are correct: there is no need for you to address the content because you are incorrect on each count. *One can't be "out of touch with their real perceptions". Most people can't, at least not without drinking a lot. Sssshhhh and George may be exceptions. But a person's perception can be out of touch with reality. It's called delusional. ScottW Of course. |
#174
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Audiophiles' Delight: Vinyl LPs Still Sell
In article
, ScottW wrote: On Sep 9, 3:13*pm, Jenn wrote: In article , *ScottW wrote: On Sep 9, 3:01*pm, Jenn wrote: Finally, you are correct: there is no need for you to address the content because you are incorrect on each count. *One can't be "out of touch with their real perceptions". Most people can't, at least not without drinking a lot. Sssshhhh and George may be exceptions. But a person's perception can be out of touch with reality. It's called delusional. ScottW Of course. So would you rather be drunk or delusional? ScottW C. |
#175
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Audiophiles' Delight: Vinyl LPs Still Sell
In article
, ScottW wrote: On Sep 9, 3:16*pm, Jenn wrote: In article , *ScottW wrote: On Sep 9, 3:13*pm, Jenn wrote: In article , *ScottW wrote: On Sep 9, 3:01*pm, Jenn wrote: Finally, you are correct: there is no need for you to address the content because you are incorrect on each count. *One can't be "out of touch with their real perceptions". Most people can't, at least not without drinking a lot. Sssshhhh and George may be exceptions. But a person's perception can be out of touch with reality. It's called delusional. ScottW Of course. So would you rather be drunk or delusional? ScottW C. Try sleeping that one off. ScottW There's no "none of the above"? |
#176
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Audiophiles' Delight: Vinyl LPs Still Sell
In article
, ScottW wrote: On Sep 9, 3:27*pm, Jenn wrote: In article , *ScottW wrote: On Sep 9, 3:16*pm, Jenn wrote: In article , *ScottW wrote: On Sep 9, 3:13*pm, Jenn wrote: In article , *ScottW wrote: On Sep 9, 3:01*pm, Jenn wrote: Finally, you are correct: there is no need for you to address the content because you are incorrect on each count. *One can't be "out of touch with their real perceptions". Most people can't, at least not without drinking a lot. Sssshhhh and George may be exceptions. But a person's perception can be out of touch with reality. It's called delusional. ScottW Of course. So would you rather be drunk or delusional? ScottW C. * Try sleeping that one off. ScottW There's no "none of the above"? Sure, if you're a corpse, otherwise you must have a preference. ScottW Lack of experience is the problem. As far as I know, I'm not delusional, and I haven't been drunk since 1990. |
#177
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Audiophiles' Delight: Vinyl LPs Still Sell
Jenn said: Lack of experience is the problem. As far as I know, I'm not delusional, and I haven't been drunk since 1990. Not even a little? That must have been a hell of a bender. |
#178
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Audiophiles' Delight: Vinyl LPs Still Sell
On Sep 9, 5:11*pm, ScottW wrote:
On Sep 9, 3:01*pm, Jenn wrote: Finally, you are correct: there is no need for you to address the content because you are incorrect on each count. *One can't be "out of touch with their real perceptions". Most people can't, at least not without drinking a lot. Sssshhhh and George may be exceptions. Nice one, 2pid! Who says you don't have a sense of humor? LoL. But a person's perception can be out of touch with reality. It's called delusional. Even if deluded, their perception is still their perception. For example, you claim to "not be a christian" yet you defend that religion frequently. Maybe that's because of all the "love" you get at christmas. You also appear to think that you're smart. Both are delusions. LoL. |
#179
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Audiophiles' Delight: Vinyl LPs Still Sell
In article
, ScottW wrote: On Sep 9, 3:57*pm, Jenn wrote: In article , *ScottW wrote: On Sep 9, 3:27*pm, Jenn wrote: In article , *ScottW wrote: On Sep 9, 3:16*pm, Jenn wrote: In article , *ScottW wrote: On Sep 9, 3:13*pm, Jenn wrote: In article om, *ScottW wrote: On Sep 9, 3:01*pm, Jenn wrote: Finally, you are correct: there is no need for you to address the content because you are incorrect on each count. *One can't be "out of touch with their real perceptions". Most people can't, at least not without drinking a lot. Sssshhhh and George may be exceptions. But a person's perception can be out of touch with reality. It's called delusional. ScottW Of course. So would you rather be drunk or delusional? ScottW C. * Try sleeping that one off. ScottW There's no "none of the above"? *Sure, if you're a corpse, otherwise you must have a preference. ScottW Lack of experience is the problem. *As far as I know, I'm not delusional, Delusional people are always the last to know. Of course. and I haven't been drunk since 1990. What was the occasion? Lost track of how much wine I was drinking at a fund raiser for the Oregon Symphony. |
#180
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Audiophiles' Delight: Vinyl LPs Still Sell
On Sep 9, 7:35 am, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"John Atkinson" wrote in message On Sep 8, 4:45 pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "John Atkinson" wrote in message You said that I have "long held" that you are "insane," Mr. Krueger...This is not correct. Are you saying that ****R doesn't believe that I'm insane? He has stated many times that he does. But that has nothing to do with me. Maybe yes, maybe no. Definitely no. You do yourself no favors when you start hinting at conspiracies, Mr. Krueger. Certainly, your many suggests that I may be insane... There were not "many." As you are well aware, Mr. Krueger, having apparently stored it on your hard drive,there was a post back in July 2002 in which I conjectured that you were insane. This post didn't come out of a vacuum; the disconnect between what you were saying and reaiity was so large that your being insane was a possible explanation. ... were part of his mindset before he started his current campaign of libel and character assassination. Except that "Sssh" wasn't posting to r.a.o. back in 2002. As I said, he is not me, neither does he speak for me. No John... At least you now admit the obvious, Mr. Krueger, whereas yesterday you seemed to be implying the opposite. :-) but when it comes to repeated libels and character assignation, he speaks like you. Perhaps to a non-native English speaker like yourself, Mr. Krueger. I have made no statement about your purported insanity since 2002, Mr. Krueger. Well, other than on July 23 of this year, and an indirect reference on July 4, and... The reference I made on July 23 was to the same 2002 posting to which I have already referred in this thread. Doesn't matter, John. Whether you repeat yourself or not, every time you make a posting like that, you are libeling me. I was asked a direct question about the subject, Mr. Krueger. And in the context of your misleading statement, that I have "long held" that you are "insane," my referring to that July 2002 post in response to a question does not support your case, Mr. Krueger. And nor have I "libeled" you, please note. The July 4 reference to your supposed insanity was actually by "Sssh," not me. You both posted in that thread, and your posts were related. Right, He said you were insane; in response I offered an alternative explanation for your behavior. By doing so, it should be clear that I therefore disagreed with him regarding your purported insanity. As I said, we are two different people with different opinions on this matter. I actually defended you in that July 4 posting, Mr. Krueger, by conjecturing that a possible reason for your inability to find a Web page for which you had been given the URL was not insanity. Instead, it could just have been your lack of familiarity with browser programs. Obviously the true explanation was beyond your ability to correctly surmise, John. Huh? Are you now saying that I was wrong, that you _are_ insane, Mr. Krueger? You could have put an end to the whole affair by posting a URL... I did. I also gave clear instructions on how to find the webpage in question. Everyone else on this newsgroup had no problem visiting the page yet you _still_ couldn't find it, even with the URL. Hence my conjecture that you were not familiar with how to use a Web browser. After all, you had already admitted having problems using search engines. John every time I troll you, you jump out of the water and bite at my hook. Just put it down to my being an editor, wanting to correct gross misstatements of the sort you post, Mr. Krueger. But if you wish to be a self-admitted troll, I am certainly not going to stop you. John Atkinson Editor, Stereophile |
#181
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Audiophiles' Delight: Vinyl LPs Still Sell
On Sep 9, 10:03*am, Vinylanach wrote:
On Sep 9, 4:56 am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" Character assignation: the act of apportioning GOIA's 'character'. Currently GOIA's 'character' is apportioned 65% ****ty, 15% hypocrite, 10% paranoid and 10% deluded.- For the record, I think he's a 'tard. I accept and embrace your differing POV and I promise not to oppress it. |
#182
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Audiophiles' Delight: Vinyl LPs Still Sell
On Sep 9, 5:54*pm, ScottW wrote:
On Sep 9, 3:27*pm, Jenn wrote: There's no "none of the above"? *Sure, if you're a corpse, otherwise you must have a preference. There's that binary 'thinking' again. Watch out, Clyde. It appears to be contagious. |
#183
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Audiophiles' Delight: Vinyl LPs Still Sell
On Sep 9, 7:04*pm, John Atkinson wrote:
On Sep 9, 7:35 am, "Arny Krueger" wrote: ... were part of his mindset before he started his current campaign of libel and character assassination. Except that "Sssh" wasn't posting to r.a.o. back in 2002. When did you invent me again? I forget. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Audiophiles' Delight: Vinyl LPs Still Sell | General | |||
Audiophiles' Delight: Vinyl LPs Still Sell | Audio Opinions | |||
FS: Pack Rat's Delight Patchbay, wiring, XLR and TRS | Pro Audio | |||
bass tone on rapper's delight | Pro Audio | |||
To Sell or Not to Sell: Nakamichi 1000 Tri-Tracer cassette deck | Marketplace |